The QuantLib reference manual contains a list of allegedly known bugs (see .) We're looking to volunteers to help us verify them. Your mission, should you accept it, is to check the bugs (details later) and add the legitimate ones to the Sourceforge bug tracker at so that they can be fixed. Offering to provide a patch is welcome, but not necessary---the aim at this time is just to have them filed in the tracker. Karma points will go to those that file the bugs using their Sourceforge username instead of doing it anonymously. As for the bugs: - some of them were reproduced; for instance, the AssetSwap test cases would fail if run with QL_USE_INDEXED_COUPON defined. In this case, the only step needed is to file the bug with a reference to the test cases. - some of them generically state that "the results are not reliable". Each such class should be stress-tested with different input values and the results should be checked (Greeks can be tested numerically; values can be tested against known good values.) For each class, a bug should be filed in the tracker including the input values that yield bad results (or better yet, the code triggering them.) - some of them generically state that "the class was not tested enough" or some such wording. For each such class, please reply to the list if you used it and found that it gives decent results. - the remaining bugs pinpoint a particular failure. Each should be reproduced (if still present) and filed in the bug tracker together with the code triggering the error. If the bug cannot be reproduced, post a message to the list.