1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123
|
Description: Fix manpage typos.
Fix various typos in the manual pages.
Author: A Costa <agcosta@gis.net>
Reviewed-By: Chris Lawrence <lawrencc@debian.org>
Bug-Debian: http://bugs.debian.org/184711
Bug-Debian: http://bugs.debian.org/310350
Last-Update: 2014-04-14
--- diction-1.11.orig/diction.1.in
+++ diction-1.11/diction.1.in
@@ -94,7 +94,7 @@ phrase language. The default language i
.SH AUTHOR \"{{{
This program is GNU software, copyright 1997\(en2007 Michael Haardt <michael@moria.de>.
.PP
-The english phrase file contains contributions by Greg Lindahl
+The English phrase file contains contributions by Greg Lindahl
<lindahl@pbm.com>, Wil Baden, Gary D. Kline, Kimberly Hanks and
Beth Morris. The dutch phrase file was contributed by Hans Lodder.
.PP
--- diction-1.11.orig/style.1.in
+++ diction-1.11/style.1.in
@@ -60,14 +60,14 @@ consists of two or more new line charact
\fBStyle\fP understands \fIcpp\fP(1) \fB#line\fP lines for being able to
give precise locations when printing sentences.
.IP "Kincaid formula" \"{{{
-The Kincaid Formula has been developed for Navy training manuals, that
-ranged in difficulty from 5.5 to 16.3. It is probably best applied
-to technical documents, because it is based on adult training manuals
-rather than school book text. Dialogs (often found in fictional texts)
-are usually a series of short sentences, which lowers the score. On the
-other hand, scientific texts with many long scientific terms are rated
-higher, although they are not necessarily harder to read for people
-who are familiar with those terms.
+The Kincaid Formula was developed for U.S. Navy training manuals; it
+ranges in difficulty from 5.5 to 16.3. It is probably best applied to
+technical documents, because it is based on adult training manuals
+rather than school book text. Dialogs (often found in fictional
+texts) are usually a series of short sentences, which lowers the
+score. On the other hand, scientific texts with many long scientific
+terms are rated higher, although they are not necessarily harder to
+read for people who are familiar with those terms.
.sp
.\"{{{ Kincaid Index
.if t \{\
@@ -122,13 +122,13 @@ Coleman-Liau = 5.88*chars/wds-29.5*sent/
.\}
.\"}}}
.\"}}}
-.IP "Flesh reading easy formula" \"{{{
-The Flesh reading easy formula has been developed by Flesh in 1948 and
-it is based on school text covering grade 3 to 12. It is wide spread,
-especially in the USA, because of good results and simple computation.
-The index is usually between 0 (hard) and 100 (easy), standard English
-documents averages approximately 60 to 70. Applying it to German
-documents does not deliver good results because of the different language
+.IP "Flesch Reading Ease formula" \"{{{
+Developed by Rudolph Flesch in 1948, the Flesch Reading Ease formula
+is based on school texts covering grades 3 to 12. It is widespread,
+especially in the USA, because it is computed easily and produces good
+results. The index ranges from 0 (hard) to 100 (easy). Standard
+English documents average around 60 to 70. Applying it to German
+documents gives bad results because of the different language
structure.
.sp
.\"{{{ Flesh reading easy formula
@@ -147,13 +147,13 @@ Flesch Index = 206.835-84.6*syll/wds-1.0
.\"}}}
.\"}}}
.IP "Fog Index" \"{{{
-The Fog index has been developed by Robert Gunning. Its value is a
-school grade. The ``ideal'' Fog Index level is 7 or 8. A level above
-12 indicates the writing sample is too hard for most people to read.
-Only use it on texts of at least hundred words to get meaningful results.
-Note that a correct implementation would not count words of three or
-more syllables that are proper names, combinations of easy words, or
-made three syllables by suffixes such as \(ened, \(enes, or \(ening.
+The Fog index was developed by Robert Gunning. Its value is a school
+grade. The \(lqideal\(rq Fog Index level is 7 or 8. A level above 12
+indicates the writing sample is too hard for most people to read.
+Texts less than 100 words will not produce meaningful results. Note
+that a correct implementation would not count words of three or more
+syllables that are proper names, combinations of easy words, or made
+three syllables by suffixes such as \(ened, \(enes, or \(ening.
.sp
.\"{{{ Fog Index formula
.if t \{\
@@ -232,7 +232,7 @@ Fog Index = 0.4*(wds/sent+100*((wds >= 3
.\".RE
.\"}}}
.IP "Lix formula" \"{{{
-The Lix formula developed by Bj�rnsson from Sweden is very simple and
+The Lix formula developed by Bj\(:ornsson from Sweden is very simple and
employs a mapping table as well:
.sp
.\"{{{ Lix
@@ -261,9 +261,9 @@ School year##5##6##7##8##9##10##11
.TE
.RE
.\"}}}
-.IP "SMOG-Grading" \"{{{
-The SMOG-Grading for English texts has been developed by McLaughlin
-in 1969. Its result is a school grade.
+.IP "SMOG Grading" \"{{{
+The SMOG Grading for English texts was developed by McLaughlin in
+1969. Its result is a school grade.
.sp
.\"{{{ SMOG
.if t \{\
@@ -275,12 +275,12 @@ italic "SMOG-Grading" = sqrt { { (words
.\}
.if n \{\
.ad l
-SMOG-Grading = square root of (((wds >= 3 syll)/sent)*30) + 3
+SMOG Grading = square root of (((wds >= 3 syll)/sent)*30) + 3
.ad b
.\}
.\"}}}
.sp
-It has been adapted to German by Bamberger & Vanecek in 1984, who changed
+It was adapted to German by Bamberger and Vanecek in 1984, who changed
the constant +3 to \-2.
.\"}}}
.SS "Word usage"
|