Package: iptables / 1.6.0+snapshot20161117-6

0001-extensions-libxt_hashlimit-fix-64-bit-printf-formats.patch Patch series | download
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
From 99bdf88352fd8cad3d907a203d3720151d129c18 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: James Cowgill <James.Cowgill@imgtec.com>
Date: Fri, 7 Apr 2017 12:10:26 +0100
Subject: [PATCH iptables] extensions: libxt_hashlimit: fix 64-bit printf formats

hashlimit was using "%lu" in a lot of printf format specifiers to print
64-bit integers. This is incorrect on 32-bit architectures because
"long int" is 32-bits there. On MIPS, it was causing iptables to
segfault when printing these integers.

Fix by using the correct format specifier.

Signed-off-by: James Cowgill <James.Cowgill@imgtec.com>
---
 extensions/libxt_hashlimit.c | 14 +++++++-------
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/extensions/libxt_hashlimit.c b/extensions/libxt_hashlimit.c
index 52fc4fa..63cf903 100644
--- a/extensions/libxt_hashlimit.c
+++ b/extensions/libxt_hashlimit.c
@@ -12,9 +12,9 @@
  */
 #define _BSD_SOURCE 1
 #define _ISOC99_SOURCE 1
+#include <inttypes.h>
 #include <math.h>
 #include <stdbool.h>
-#include <stdint.h>
 #include <stdio.h>
 #include <string.h>
 #include <stdlib.h>
@@ -262,7 +262,7 @@ static uint64_t parse_burst(const char *burst, int revision)
 	if (v > max)
 		xtables_error(PARAMETER_PROBLEM, "bad value for option "
 			"\"--hashlimit-burst\", value \"%s\" too large "
-				"(max %lumb).", burst, max/1024/1024);
+				"(max %" PRIu64 "mb).", burst, max/1024/1024);
 	return v;
 }
 
@@ -285,8 +285,8 @@ static bool parse_bytes(const char *rate, void *val, struct hashlimit_mt_udata *
 	tmp = (uint64_t) r * factor;
 	if (tmp > max)
 		xtables_error(PARAMETER_PROBLEM,
-			"Rate value too large \"%llu\" (max %lu)\n",
-					(unsigned long long)tmp, max);
+			"Rate value too large \"%" PRIu64 "\" (max %" PRIu64 ")\n",
+					tmp, max);
 
 	tmp = bytes_to_cost(tmp);
 	if (tmp == 0)
@@ -557,7 +557,7 @@ static void hashlimit_mt_check_v1(struct xt_fcheck_call *cb)
 		if (cb->xflags & F_BURST) {
 			if (info->cfg.burst < cost_to_bytes(info->cfg.avg))
 				xtables_error(PARAMETER_PROBLEM,
-					"burst cannot be smaller than %lub", cost_to_bytes(info->cfg.avg));
+					"burst cannot be smaller than %" PRIu64 "b", cost_to_bytes(info->cfg.avg));
 
 			burst = info->cfg.burst;
 			burst /= cost_to_bytes(info->cfg.avg);
@@ -587,7 +587,7 @@ static void hashlimit_mt_check(struct xt_fcheck_call *cb)
 		if (cb->xflags & F_BURST) {
 			if (info->cfg.burst < cost_to_bytes(info->cfg.avg))
 				xtables_error(PARAMETER_PROBLEM,
-					"burst cannot be smaller than %lub", cost_to_bytes(info->cfg.avg));
+					"burst cannot be smaller than %" PRIu64 "b", cost_to_bytes(info->cfg.avg));
 
 			burst = info->cfg.burst;
 			burst /= cost_to_bytes(info->cfg.avg);
@@ -631,7 +631,7 @@ static uint32_t print_rate(uint32_t period, int revision)
             || _rates[i].mult/period < _rates[i].mult%period)
 			break;
 
-	printf(" %lu/%s", _rates[i-1].mult / period, _rates[i-1].name);
+	printf(" %" PRIu64 "/%s", _rates[i-1].mult / period, _rates[i-1].name);
 	/* return in msec */
 	return _rates[i-1].mult / scale * 1000;
 }
-- 
2.11.0