Package: prometheus-node-exporter-collectors / 0.0~git20230203.6f710f8-1+deb12u2
Metadata
| Package | Version | Patches format |
|---|---|---|
| prometheus-node-exporter-collectors | 0.0~git20230203.6f710f8-1+deb12u2 | 3.0 (quilt) |
Patch series
view the series file| Patch | File delta | Description |
|---|---|---|
| 0001 do not run apt update or simulate apt dist upgrade.patch | (download) |
apt_info.py |
9 0 + 9 - 0 ! |
[patch] do not run apt update or simulate apt dist-upgrade MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit This is causing all sorts of problems. The first of which is that we're hitting our poor mirrors every time the script is ran, which, in the Debian package configuration, is *every 15 minutes* (!!). The second is that this locks the cache and makes this script needlessly stumble upon a possible regression in APT from Debian bookworm and Ubuntu 22.06: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt/+bug/2003851 That still has to be confirmed: it's possible that `apt update` can hang for a long time, but that shouldn't concern us if we delegate this work out of band. I also do not believe actually performing the `dist-upgrade` calculations is necessary to compute the pending upgrades at all. I've done work with python-apt for other projects and haven't found that to be required: the cache has the necessary information about pending upgrades. Closes: #179 Signed-off-by: Antoine Beaupr <anarcat@debian.org> |
| 0001 report the apt cache timestamp.patch | (download) |
apt_info.py |
12 12 + 0 - 0 ! |
[patch] report the apt cache timestamp MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit We use the `pkgcache.bin` modification time as a heuristic, but there might be a better way to do this. We also silently ignore errors when pulling that file to avoid broken systems from breaking the other metrics. I believe this will lead to a null metric which is probably what we want anyway. A possible improvement to this would be to individually inspect the `InRelease` files and report the mirror's timestamps as well, but that's more involved. It's also not a priority compared to this fix, because we want the update timestamp if we remove the `apt update` run (in #181). Closes: #180 Signed-off-by: Antoine Beaupr <anarcat@debian.org> Co-authored-by: Ben Kochie <superq@gmail.com> |
| 0001 use a better heuristic for the apt update last run t.patch | (download) |
apt_info.py |
12 11 + 1 - 0 ! |
[patch] use a better heuristic for the apt update last run time MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit As reported in #182, `pkgcache.bin` gets updated on more than just `apt update`. In particular, it gets modified when a package is installed, upgraded or removed. So let's fallback on a better heuristic, which is the `APT::Periodic` timestamp. This should give us a much more precise and deliberate status. We also fallback to the `lists` directory, which gets updated when new mirror lists gets moved into place. This does run the risk of staying silently unchanged if there's no change on mirrors but (a) that's rather infrequent and (b) we might actually want to warn on that anyway. Signed-off-by: Antoine Beaupr <anarcat@debian.org> Closes: #183 |
| 0001 apt_info.py fix apt_upgrades_pending and apt_upgrade.patch | (download) |
apt_info.py |
7 5 + 2 - 0 ! |
apt_info.py: fix apt_upgrades_pending and apt_upgrades_held Backported from https://github.com/prometheus-community/node-exporter-textfile-collector-scripts/pull/207 |
| 0002 Improve heuristic for the apt update last run time 2.patch | (download) |
apt_info.py |
11 7 + 4 - 0 ! |
improve heuristic for the apt update last run time (#208) As suggested by #194 and this fixes it Signed-off-by: kennethso168 <kennethso168@gmail.com> |
1
