1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474
|
From 6d3da1eb00a31e7b0a30415d81c1ac4508da2aad Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Aaron Haslett <aaronhaslett@catalyst.net.nz>
Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2018 17:25:51 +1300
Subject: [PATCH 1/4] CVE-2018-14629 dns: CNAME loop prevention using counter
Count number of answers generated by internal DNS query routine and stop at
20 to match Microsoft's loop prevention mechanism.
(backport to Samba 4.5)
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13600
Signed-off-by: Aaron Haslett <aaronhaslett@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Garming Sam <garming@catalyst.net.nz>
---
python/samba/tests/dns.py | 23 +++++++++++++++++++++++
selftest/knownfail.d/dns | 5 +++++
source4/dns_server/dns_query.c | 6 ++++++
3 files changed, 34 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 selftest/knownfail.d/dns
diff --git a/python/samba/tests/dns.py b/python/samba/tests/dns.py
index babf898afd7..102269c7156 100644
--- a/python/samba/tests/dns.py
+++ b/python/samba/tests/dns.py
@@ -896,6 +896,29 @@ class TestComplexQueries(DNSTest):
self.assertEquals(response.answers[1].name, name2)
self.assertEquals(response.answers[1].rdata, name3)
+ def test_cname_loop(self):
+ cname1 = "cnamelooptestrec." + self.get_dns_domain()
+ cname2 = "cnamelooptestrec2." + self.get_dns_domain()
+ cname3 = "cnamelooptestrec3." + self.get_dns_domain()
+ self.make_dns_update(cname1, cname2, dnsp.DNS_TYPE_CNAME)
+ self.make_dns_update(cname2, cname3, dnsp.DNS_TYPE_CNAME)
+ self.make_dns_update(cname3, cname1, dnsp.DNS_TYPE_CNAME)
+
+ p = self.make_name_packet(dns.DNS_OPCODE_QUERY)
+ questions = []
+
+ q = self.make_name_question(cname1,
+ dns.DNS_QTYPE_A,
+ dns.DNS_QCLASS_IN)
+ questions.append(q)
+ self.finish_name_packet(p, questions)
+
+ response = self.dns_transaction_udp(p, host=self.server_ip)
+
+ max_recursion_depth = 20
+ self.assertEquals(len(response.answers), max_recursion_depth)
+
+
class TestInvalidQueries(DNSTest):
def test_one_a_query(self):
diff --git a/selftest/knownfail.d/dns b/selftest/knownfail.d/dns
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..916afc1af85
--- /dev/null
+++ b/selftest/knownfail.d/dns
@@ -0,0 +1,5 @@
+#
+# rodc and vampire_dc require signed dns updates, so the test setup
+# fails, but the test does run on fl2003dc
+^samba.tests.dns.__main__.TestComplexQueries.test_cname_loop\(rodc:local\)
+^samba.tests.dns.__main__.TestComplexQueries.test_cname_loop\(vampire_dc:local\)
diff --git a/source4/dns_server/dns_query.c b/source4/dns_server/dns_query.c
index 3e9359ee666..0c26f9f8fb5 100644
--- a/source4/dns_server/dns_query.c
+++ b/source4/dns_server/dns_query.c
@@ -40,6 +40,7 @@
#undef DBGC_CLASS
#define DBGC_CLASS DBGC_DNS
+#define MAX_Q_RECURSION_DEPTH 20
struct forwarder_string {
const char *forwarder;
@@ -470,6 +471,11 @@ static struct tevent_req *handle_dnsrpcrec_send(
state->answers = answers;
state->nsrecs = nsrecs;
+ if (talloc_array_length(*answers) >= MAX_Q_RECURSION_DEPTH) {
+ tevent_req_done(req);
+ return tevent_req_post(req, ev);
+ }
+
resolve_cname = ((rec->wType == DNS_TYPE_CNAME) &&
((question->question_type == DNS_QTYPE_A) ||
(question->question_type == DNS_QTYPE_AAAA)));
--
2.11.0
From 5104d30c53be7161d03c853f480223b24115874a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Garming Sam <garming@catalyst.net.nz>
Date: Tue, 6 Sep 2016 10:48:57 +1200
Subject: [PATCH 2/4] tests/dns_forwarder: Wait for port for 15 seconds
Signed-off-by: Garming Sam <garming@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
(cherry picked from commit 668e4e4a436756d73d64790fd0a7e79fa4769ffe)
---
python/samba/tests/dns_forwarder.py | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/python/samba/tests/dns_forwarder.py b/python/samba/tests/dns_forwarder.py
index de36de9c979..1d598662a83 100644
--- a/python/samba/tests/dns_forwarder.py
+++ b/python/samba/tests/dns_forwarder.py
@@ -185,8 +185,8 @@ class TestDnsForwarding(DNSTest):
host, str(port), id])
self.subprocesses.append(p)
s = socket.socket(socket.AF_INET, socket.SOCK_DGRAM, 0)
- for i in xrange(30):
- time.sleep(0.01)
+ for i in xrange(300):
+ time.sleep(0.05)
s.connect((host, port))
try:
s.send('timeout 0', 0)
--
2.11.0
From c66c90469efe920d8273df041c1c46698ffb1a21 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Garming Sam <garming@catalyst.net.nz>
Date: Thu, 7 Jul 2016 16:58:27 +1200
Subject: [PATCH 3/4] tests/dns_forwarder: Check that the subprocess is still
living
Signed-off-by: Garming Sam <garming@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
(cherry picked from commit ad3b3e978ebf0692580166f9deba0368a922362d)
---
python/samba/tests/dns_forwarder.py | 4 ++++
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
diff --git a/python/samba/tests/dns_forwarder.py b/python/samba/tests/dns_forwarder.py
index 1d598662a83..bef21f6bdaf 100644
--- a/python/samba/tests/dns_forwarder.py
+++ b/python/samba/tests/dns_forwarder.py
@@ -193,6 +193,10 @@ class TestDnsForwarding(DNSTest):
except socket.error, e:
if e.errno in (errno.ECONNREFUSED, errno.EHOSTUNREACH):
continue
+
+ if p.returncode is not None:
+ self.fail("Toy server has managed to die already!")
+
return s
def tearDown(self):
--
2.11.0
From dec2a328b3262b131f147c339fa17112f998ca39 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Garming Sam <garming@samba.org>
Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2016 03:52:38 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 4/4] tests/dns_forwarder: Fail out with an assertion instead
OOB error
Signed-off-by: Garming Sam <garming@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Garming Sam <garming@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Tue Sep 6 15:41:54 CEST 2016 on sn-devel-144
(cherry picked from commit 451907739cc14717c12875b88fbbe63a53e9cbec)
---
python/samba/tests/dns_forwarder.py | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/python/samba/tests/dns_forwarder.py b/python/samba/tests/dns_forwarder.py
index bef21f6bdaf..51a86198b54 100644
--- a/python/samba/tests/dns_forwarder.py
+++ b/python/samba/tests/dns_forwarder.py
@@ -466,8 +466,9 @@ class TestDnsForwarding(DNSTest):
try:
data = ad.recv(0xffff + 2, 0)
data = ndr.ndr_unpack(dns.name_packet, data)
- self.assertEqual('forwarder1', data.answers[0].rdata)
self.assert_dns_rcode_equals(data, dns.DNS_RCODE_OK)
+ self.assertEqual(len(data.answers), 1)
+ self.assertEqual('forwarder1', data.answers[0].rdata)
except socket.timeout:
self.fail("DNS server is too slow (timeout %s)" % timeout)
--
2.11.0
From 6c73a2b3d77115d69f99baa2452d6539c697fc3b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2018 15:21:56 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] CVE-2018-14629 dns: fix CNAME loop prevention using
counter regression
The loop prevention should only be done for CNAME records!
Otherwise we truncate the answer records for A, AAAA or
SRV queries, which is a bad idea if you have more than 20 DCs.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13600
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
---
source4/dns_server/dns_query.c | 29 ++++++++++++++++++++---------
1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/source4/dns_server/dns_query.c b/source4/dns_server/dns_query.c
index 0c26f9f8fb5..19c4dc32faa 100644
--- a/source4/dns_server/dns_query.c
+++ b/source4/dns_server/dns_query.c
@@ -439,7 +439,8 @@ static struct tevent_req *handle_authoritative_send(
TALLOC_CTX *mem_ctx, struct tevent_context *ev,
struct dns_server *dns, const char *forwarder,
struct dns_name_question *question,
- struct dns_res_rec **answers, struct dns_res_rec **nsrecs);
+ struct dns_res_rec **answers, struct dns_res_rec **nsrecs,
+ size_t cname_depth);
static WERROR handle_authoritative_recv(struct tevent_req *req);
struct handle_dnsrpcrec_state {
@@ -455,7 +456,8 @@ static struct tevent_req *handle_dnsrpcrec_send(
struct dns_server *dns, const char *forwarder,
const struct dns_name_question *question,
struct dnsp_DnssrvRpcRecord *rec,
- struct dns_res_rec **answers, struct dns_res_rec **nsrecs)
+ struct dns_res_rec **answers, struct dns_res_rec **nsrecs,
+ size_t cname_depth)
{
struct tevent_req *req, *subreq;
struct handle_dnsrpcrec_state *state;
@@ -471,7 +473,7 @@ static struct tevent_req *handle_dnsrpcrec_send(
state->answers = answers;
state->nsrecs = nsrecs;
- if (talloc_array_length(*answers) >= MAX_Q_RECURSION_DEPTH) {
+ if (cname_depth >= MAX_Q_RECURSION_DEPTH) {
tevent_req_done(req);
return tevent_req_post(req, ev);
}
@@ -516,7 +518,8 @@ static struct tevent_req *handle_dnsrpcrec_send(
if (dns_authoritative_for_zone(dns, new_q->name)) {
subreq = handle_authoritative_send(
state, ev, dns, forwarder, new_q,
- state->answers, state->nsrecs);
+ state->answers, state->nsrecs,
+ cname_depth + 1);
if (tevent_req_nomem(subreq, req)) {
return tevent_req_post(req, ev);
}
@@ -600,6 +603,8 @@ struct handle_authoritative_state {
struct dns_res_rec **answers;
struct dns_res_rec **nsrecs;
+
+ size_t cname_depth;
};
static void handle_authoritative_done(struct tevent_req *subreq);
@@ -608,7 +613,8 @@ static struct tevent_req *handle_authoritative_send(
TALLOC_CTX *mem_ctx, struct tevent_context *ev,
struct dns_server *dns, const char *forwarder,
struct dns_name_question *question,
- struct dns_res_rec **answers, struct dns_res_rec **nsrecs)
+ struct dns_res_rec **answers, struct dns_res_rec **nsrecs,
+ size_t cname_depth)
{
struct tevent_req *req, *subreq;
struct handle_authoritative_state *state;
@@ -626,6 +632,7 @@ static struct tevent_req *handle_authoritative_send(
state->forwarder = forwarder;
state->answers = answers;
state->nsrecs = nsrecs;
+ state->cname_depth = cname_depth;
werr = dns_name2dn(dns, state, question->name, &dn);
if (tevent_req_werror(req, werr)) {
@@ -647,7 +654,8 @@ static struct tevent_req *handle_authoritative_send(
subreq = handle_dnsrpcrec_send(
state, state->ev, state->dns, state->forwarder,
state->question, &state->recs[state->recs_done],
- state->answers, state->nsrecs);
+ state->answers, state->nsrecs,
+ state->cname_depth);
if (tevent_req_nomem(subreq, req)) {
return tevent_req_post(req, ev);
}
@@ -679,7 +687,8 @@ static void handle_authoritative_done(struct tevent_req *subreq)
subreq = handle_dnsrpcrec_send(
state, state->ev, state->dns, state->forwarder,
state->question, &state->recs[state->recs_done],
- state->answers, state->nsrecs);
+ state->answers, state->nsrecs,
+ state->cname_depth);
if (tevent_req_nomem(subreq, req)) {
return;
}
@@ -1010,7 +1019,8 @@ struct tevent_req *dns_server_process_query_send(
subreq = handle_authoritative_send(
state, ev, dns, (forwarders == NULL ? NULL : forwarders[0]),
- &in->questions[0], &state->answers, &state->nsrecs);
+ &in->questions[0], &state->answers, &state->nsrecs,
+ 0); /* cname_depth */
if (tevent_req_nomem(subreq, req)) {
return tevent_req_post(req, ev);
}
@@ -1112,7 +1122,8 @@ static void dns_server_process_query_got_auth(struct tevent_req *subreq)
subreq = handle_authoritative_send(state, state->ev, state->dns,
state->forwarders->forwarder,
state->question, &state->answers,
- &state->nsrecs);
+ &state->nsrecs,
+ 0); /* cname_depth */
if (tevent_req_nomem(subreq, req)) {
return;
--
2.19.2
From 77fac10d0171b731bce38e5596928b6d618ed4d8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Aaron Haslett <aaronhaslett@catalyst.net.nz>
Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2018 18:37:27 +1300
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] CVE-2018-14629: Tests to expose regression from dns cname
loop fix
These tests expose the regression described by Stefan Metzmacher in
discussion on the bugzilla paged linked below.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13600
Signed-off-by: Aaron Haslett <aaronhaslett@catalyst.net.nz>
---
python/samba/tests/dns.py | 97 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
selftest/knownfail.d/dns | 14 +++++-
2 files changed, 109 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/python/samba/tests/dns.py b/python/samba/tests/dns.py
index 102269c7156..65e4a3b0b3f 100644
--- a/python/samba/tests/dns.py
+++ b/python/samba/tests/dns.py
@@ -918,6 +918,103 @@ class TestComplexQueries(DNSTest):
max_recursion_depth = 20
self.assertEquals(len(response.answers), max_recursion_depth)
+ # Make sure cname limit doesn't count other records. This is a generic
+ # test called in tests below
+ def max_rec_test(self, rtype, rec_gen):
+ name = "limittestrec{0}.{1}".format(rtype, self.get_dns_domain())
+ limit = 20
+ num_recs_to_enter = limit + 5
+
+ for i in range(1, num_recs_to_enter+1):
+ ip = rec_gen(i)
+ self.make_dns_update(name, ip, rtype)
+
+ p = self.make_name_packet(dns.DNS_OPCODE_QUERY)
+ questions = []
+
+ q = self.make_name_question(name,
+ rtype,
+ dns.DNS_QCLASS_IN)
+ questions.append(q)
+ self.finish_name_packet(p, questions)
+
+ response = self.dns_transaction_udp(p, host=self.server_ip)
+
+ self.assertEqual(len(response.answers), num_recs_to_enter)
+
+ def test_record_limit_A(self):
+ def ip4_gen(i):
+ return "127.0.0." + str(i)
+ self.max_rec_test(rtype=dns.DNS_QTYPE_A, rec_gen=ip4_gen)
+
+ def test_record_limit_AAAA(self):
+ def ip6_gen(i):
+ return "AAAA:0:0:0:0:0:0:" + str(i)
+ self.max_rec_test(rtype=dns.DNS_QTYPE_AAAA, rec_gen=ip6_gen)
+
+ def test_record_limit_SRV(self):
+ def srv_gen(i):
+ rec = dns.srv_record()
+ rec.priority = 1
+ rec.weight = 1
+ rec.port = 92
+ rec.target = "srvtestrec" + str(i)
+ return rec
+ self.max_rec_test(rtype=dns.DNS_QTYPE_SRV, rec_gen=srv_gen)
+
+ # Same as test_record_limit_A but with a preceding CNAME follow
+ def test_cname_limit(self):
+ cname1 = "cnamelimittestrec." + self.get_dns_domain()
+ cname2 = "cnamelimittestrec2." + self.get_dns_domain()
+ cname3 = "cnamelimittestrec3." + self.get_dns_domain()
+ ip_prefix = '127.0.0.'
+ limit = 20
+ num_recs_to_enter = limit + 5
+
+ self.make_dns_update(cname1, cname2, dnsp.DNS_TYPE_CNAME)
+ self.make_dns_update(cname2, cname3, dnsp.DNS_TYPE_CNAME)
+ num_arecs_to_enter = num_recs_to_enter - 2
+ for i in range(1, num_arecs_to_enter+1):
+ ip = ip_prefix + str(i)
+ self.make_dns_update(cname3, ip, dns.DNS_QTYPE_A)
+
+ p = self.make_name_packet(dns.DNS_OPCODE_QUERY)
+ questions = []
+
+ q = self.make_name_question(cname1,
+ dns.DNS_QTYPE_A,
+ dns.DNS_QCLASS_IN)
+ questions.append(q)
+ self.finish_name_packet(p, questions)
+
+ response = self.dns_transaction_udp(p, host=self.server_ip)
+
+ self.assertEqual(len(response.answers), num_recs_to_enter)
+
+ # ANY query on cname record shouldn't follow the link
+ def test_cname_any_query(self):
+ cname1 = "cnameanytestrec." + self.get_dns_domain()
+ cname2 = "cnameanytestrec2." + self.get_dns_domain()
+ cname3 = "cnameanytestrec3." + self.get_dns_domain()
+
+ self.make_dns_update(cname1, cname2, dnsp.DNS_TYPE_CNAME)
+ self.make_dns_update(cname2, cname3, dnsp.DNS_TYPE_CNAME)
+
+ p = self.make_name_packet(dns.DNS_OPCODE_QUERY)
+ questions = []
+
+ q = self.make_name_question(cname1,
+ dns.DNS_QTYPE_ALL,
+ dns.DNS_QCLASS_IN)
+ questions.append(q)
+ self.finish_name_packet(p, questions)
+
+ response = self.dns_transaction_udp(p, host=self.server_ip)
+
+ self.assertEqual(len(response.answers), 1)
+ self.assertEqual(response.answers[0].name, cname1)
+ self.assertEqual(response.answers[0].rdata, cname2)
+
class TestInvalidQueries(DNSTest):
diff --git a/selftest/knownfail.d/dns b/selftest/knownfail.d/dns
index 916afc1af85..a9b16eaac2a 100644
--- a/selftest/knownfail.d/dns
+++ b/selftest/knownfail.d/dns
@@ -1,5 +1,15 @@
#
-# rodc and vampire_dc require signed dns updates, so the test setup
-# fails, but the test does run on fl2003dc
+# rodc and vampire_dc require signed dns updates, so these tests' setups
+# fail, but they pass on fl2003dc
^samba.tests.dns.__main__.TestComplexQueries.test_cname_loop\(rodc:local\)
^samba.tests.dns.__main__.TestComplexQueries.test_cname_loop\(vampire_dc:local\)
+^samba.tests.dns.__main__.TestComplexQueries.test_record_limit_A\(rodc:local\)
+^samba.tests.dns.__main__.TestComplexQueries.test_record_limit_A\(vampire_dc:local\)
+^samba.tests.dns.__main__.TestComplexQueries.test_record_limit_AAAA\(rodc:local\)
+^samba.tests.dns.__main__.TestComplexQueries.test_record_limit_AAAA\(vampire_dc:local\)
+^samba.tests.dns.__main__.TestComplexQueries.test_record_limit_SRV\(rodc:local\)
+^samba.tests.dns.__main__.TestComplexQueries.test_record_limit_SRV\(vampire_dc:local\)
+^samba.tests.dns.__main__.TestComplexQueries.test_cname_limit\(vampire_dc:local\)
+^samba.tests.dns.__main__.TestComplexQueries.test_cname_limit\(rodc:local\)
+^samba.tests.dns.__main__.TestComplexQueries.test_cname_any_query\(vampire_dc:local\)
+^samba.tests.dns.__main__.TestComplexQueries.test_cname_any_query\(rodc:local\)
--
2.19.2
|