1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160
|
#!/bin/bash
# parent.sh
# Running multiple processes on an SMP box.
# Author: Tedman Eng
# This is the first of two scripts,
#+ both of which must be present in the current working directory.
LIMIT=$1 # Total number of process to start
NUMPROC=4 # Number of concurrent threads (forks?)
PROCID=1 # Starting Process ID
echo "My PID is $$"
function start_thread() {
if [ $PROCID -le $LIMIT ] ; then
./child.sh $PROCID&
let "PROCID++"
else
echo "Limit reached."
wait
exit
fi
}
while [ "$NUMPROC" -gt 0 ]; do
start_thread;
let "NUMPROC--"
done
while true
do
trap "start_thread" SIGRTMIN
done
exit 0
# ======== Second script follows ========
#!/bin/bash
# child.sh
# Running multiple processes on an SMP box.
# This script is called by parent.sh.
# Author: Tedman Eng
temp=$RANDOM
index=$1
shift
let "temp %= 5"
let "temp += 4"
echo "Starting $index Time:$temp" "$@"
sleep ${temp}
echo "Ending $index"
kill -s SIGRTMIN $PPID
exit 0
# ======================= SCRIPT AUTHOR'S NOTES ======================= #
# It's not completely bug free.
# I ran it with limit = 500 and after the first few hundred iterations,
#+ one of the concurrent threads disappeared!
# Not sure if this is collisions from trap signals or something else.
# Once the trap is received, there's a brief moment while executing the
#+ trap handler but before the next trap is set. During this time, it may
#+ be possible to miss a trap signal, thus miss spawning a child process.
# No doubt someone may spot the bug and will be writing
#+ . . . in the future.
# ===================================================================== #
# ----------------------------------------------------------------------#
#################################################################
# The following is the original script written by Vernia Damiano.
# Unfortunately, it doesn't work properly.
#################################################################
#!/bin/bash
# Must call script with at least one integer parameter
#+ (number of concurrent processes).
# All other parameters are passed through to the processes started.
INDICE=8 # Total number of process to start
TEMPO=5 # Maximum sleep time per process
E_BADARGS=65 # No arg(s) passed to script.
if [ $# -eq 0 ] # Check for at least one argument passed to script.
then
echo "Usage: `basename $0` number_of_processes [passed params]"
exit $E_BADARGS
fi
NUMPROC=$1 # Number of concurrent process
shift
PARAMETRI=( "$@" ) # Parameters of each process
function avvia() {
local temp
local index
temp=$RANDOM
index=$1
shift
let "temp %= $TEMPO"
let "temp += 1"
echo "Starting $index Time:$temp" "$@"
sleep ${temp}
echo "Ending $index"
kill -s SIGRTMIN $$
}
function parti() {
if [ $INDICE -gt 0 ] ; then
avvia $INDICE "${PARAMETRI[@]}" &
let "INDICE--"
else
trap : SIGRTMIN
fi
}
trap parti SIGRTMIN
while [ "$NUMPROC" -gt 0 ]; do
parti;
let "NUMPROC--"
done
wait
trap - SIGRTMIN
exit $?
: <<SCRIPT_AUTHOR_COMMENTS
I had the need to run a program, with specified options, on a number of
different files, using a SMP machine. So I thought [I'd] keep running
a specified number of processes and start a new one each time . . . one
of these terminates.
The "wait" instruction does not help, since it waits for a given process
or *all* process started in background. So I wrote [this] bash script
that can do the job, using the "trap" instruction.
--Vernia Damiano
SCRIPT_AUTHOR_COMMENTS
|