1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
543
544
545
546
547
548
549
550
551
552
553
554
555
556
557
558
559
560
561
562
563
564
565
566
567
568
569
570
571
572
573
574
575
576
577
578
579
580
581
582
583
584
585
586
|
(UNSET-WATERFALL-PARALLELISM)
(ASSIGN SCRIPT-MODE T)
T
(SET-LD-PROMPT T STATE)
T
ACL2 !>>(SET-INHIBITED-SUMMARY-TYPES '(TIME STEPS))
(TIME STEPS)
ACL2 !>>(SET-INHIBIT-OUTPUT-LST '(PROOF-TREE))
(PROOF-TREE)
ACL2 !>>(IN-PACKAGE "ACL2")
"ACL2"
ACL2 !>>(DEFSTOBJ ST$C FLD$C)
Summary
Form: ( DEFSTOBJ ST$C ...)
Rules: NIL
ST$C
ACL2 !>>(DEFSTUB STOP NIL NIL)
Summary
Form: (DEFSTUB STOP ...)
Rules: NIL
STOP
ACL2 !>>(DEFUN UPDATE-FLD-NIL-GOOD$C (ST$C)
(DECLARE (XARGS :STOBJS ST$C))
(UPDATE-FLD$C NIL ST$C))
Since UPDATE-FLD-NIL-GOOD$C is non-recursive, its admission is trivial.
We observe that the type of UPDATE-FLD-NIL-GOOD$C is described by the
theorem (CONSP (UPDATE-FLD-NIL-GOOD$C ST$C)). We used the :type-prescription
rule UPDATE-FLD$C.
(UPDATE-FLD-NIL-GOOD$C ST$C) => ST$C.
Computing the guard conjecture for UPDATE-FLD-NIL-GOOD$C....
The guard conjecture for UPDATE-FLD-NIL-GOOD$C is trivial to prove.
UPDATE-FLD-NIL-GOOD$C is compliant with Common Lisp.
Summary
Form: ( DEFUN UPDATE-FLD-NIL-GOOD$C ...)
Rules: ((:TYPE-PRESCRIPTION UPDATE-FLD$C))
UPDATE-FLD-NIL-GOOD$C
ACL2 !>>(DEFUN UPDATE-FLD-NIL-BAD$C (ST$C)
(DECLARE (XARGS :STOBJS ST$C))
(LET ((ST$C (UPDATE-FLD$C T ST$C)))
(PROG2$ (STOP)
(UPDATE-FLD$C NIL ST$C))))
Since UPDATE-FLD-NIL-BAD$C is non-recursive, its admission is trivial.
We observe that the type of UPDATE-FLD-NIL-BAD$C is described by the
theorem (CONSP (UPDATE-FLD-NIL-BAD$C ST$C)). We used the :type-prescription
rule UPDATE-FLD$C.
(UPDATE-FLD-NIL-BAD$C ST$C) => ST$C.
Computing the guard conjecture for UPDATE-FLD-NIL-BAD$C....
The guard conjecture for UPDATE-FLD-NIL-BAD$C is trivial to prove.
UPDATE-FLD-NIL-BAD$C is compliant with Common Lisp.
Summary
Form: ( DEFUN UPDATE-FLD-NIL-BAD$C ...)
Rules: ((:TYPE-PRESCRIPTION UPDATE-FLD$C))
UPDATE-FLD-NIL-BAD$C
ACL2 !>>(DEFUN ST$AP (X)
(DECLARE (XARGS :GUARD T))
(EQUAL X NIL))
Since ST$AP is non-recursive, its admission is trivial. We observe
that the type of ST$AP is described by the theorem
(OR (EQUAL (ST$AP X) T) (EQUAL (ST$AP X) NIL)). We used primitive
type reasoning.
Computing the guard conjecture for ST$AP....
The guard conjecture for ST$AP is trivial to prove. ST$AP is compliant
with Common Lisp.
Summary
Form: ( DEFUN ST$AP ...)
Rules: ((:FAKE-RUNE-FOR-TYPE-SET NIL))
ST$AP
ACL2 !>>(DEFUN CREATE-ST$A
NIL (DECLARE (XARGS :GUARD T))
NIL)
Since CREATE-ST$A is non-recursive, its admission is trivial. We observe
that the type of CREATE-ST$A is described by the theorem
(EQUAL (CREATE-ST$A) NIL).
Computing the guard conjecture for CREATE-ST$A....
The guard conjecture for CREATE-ST$A is trivial to prove. CREATE-ST$A
is compliant with Common Lisp.
Summary
Form: ( DEFUN CREATE-ST$A ...)
Rules: NIL
CREATE-ST$A
ACL2 !>>(DEFUN FLD$A (ST$A)
(DECLARE (XARGS :GUARD T))
ST$A)
Since FLD$A is non-recursive, its admission is trivial. We observe
that the type of FLD$A is described by the theorem (EQUAL (FLD$A ST$A) ST$A).
Computing the guard conjecture for FLD$A....
The guard conjecture for FLD$A is trivial to prove. FLD$A is compliant
with Common Lisp.
Summary
Form: ( DEFUN FLD$A ...)
Rules: NIL
FLD$A
ACL2 !>>(DEFUN UPDATE-FLD-NIL-BAD$A (ST$A)
(DECLARE (XARGS :GUARD T) (IGNORE ST$A))
NIL)
Since UPDATE-FLD-NIL-BAD$A is non-recursive, its admission is trivial.
We observe that the type of UPDATE-FLD-NIL-BAD$A is described by the
theorem (EQUAL (UPDATE-FLD-NIL-BAD$A ST$A) NIL).
Computing the guard conjecture for UPDATE-FLD-NIL-BAD$A....
The guard conjecture for UPDATE-FLD-NIL-BAD$A is trivial to prove.
UPDATE-FLD-NIL-BAD$A is compliant with Common Lisp.
Summary
Form: ( DEFUN UPDATE-FLD-NIL-BAD$A ...)
Rules: NIL
UPDATE-FLD-NIL-BAD$A
ACL2 !>>(DEFUN UPDATE-FLD-NIL-GOOD$A (ST$A)
(DECLARE (XARGS :GUARD T) (IGNORE ST$A))
NIL)
Since UPDATE-FLD-NIL-GOOD$A is non-recursive, its admission is trivial.
We observe that the type of UPDATE-FLD-NIL-GOOD$A is described by the
theorem (EQUAL (UPDATE-FLD-NIL-GOOD$A ST$A) NIL).
Computing the guard conjecture for UPDATE-FLD-NIL-GOOD$A....
The guard conjecture for UPDATE-FLD-NIL-GOOD$A is trivial to prove.
UPDATE-FLD-NIL-GOOD$A is compliant with Common Lisp.
Summary
Form: ( DEFUN UPDATE-FLD-NIL-GOOD$A ...)
Rules: NIL
UPDATE-FLD-NIL-GOOD$A
ACL2 !>>(DEFUN-NX ST$CORR (ST$C X)
(AND (ST$AP X)
(ST$CP ST$C)
(EQUAL (FLD$C ST$C) NIL)))
Since ST$CORR is non-recursive, its admission is trivial. We observe
that the type of ST$CORR is described by the theorem
(OR (EQUAL (ST$CORR ST$C X) T) (EQUAL (ST$CORR ST$C X) NIL)). We used
primitive type reasoning.
Summary
Form: ( DEFUN ST$CORR ...)
Rules: ((:FAKE-RUNE-FOR-TYPE-SET NIL))
(:DEFUN-NX ST$CORR)
ACL2 !>>(IN-THEORY (DISABLE (ST$CORR)))
Summary
Form: ( IN-THEORY (DISABLE ...))
Rules: NIL
:CURRENT-THEORY-UPDATED
ACL2 !>>(DEFTHM CREATE-ST{CORRESPONDENCE}
(ST$CORR (CREATE-ST$C) (CREATE-ST$A))
:RULE-CLASSES NIL)
Q.E.D.
Summary
Form: ( DEFTHM CREATE-ST{CORRESPONDENCE} ...)
Rules: ((:DEFINITION CREATE-ST$C)
(:DEFINITION ST$CORR)
(:EXECUTABLE-COUNTERPART CREATE-ST$A)
(:EXECUTABLE-COUNTERPART EQUAL)
(:EXECUTABLE-COUNTERPART FLD$C)
(:EXECUTABLE-COUNTERPART IF)
(:EXECUTABLE-COUNTERPART ST$AP)
(:EXECUTABLE-COUNTERPART ST$CP))
CREATE-ST{CORRESPONDENCE}
ACL2 !>>(DEFTHM CREATE-ST{PRESERVED}
(ST$AP (CREATE-ST$A))
:RULE-CLASSES NIL)
Q.E.D.
Summary
Form: ( DEFTHM CREATE-ST{PRESERVED} ...)
Rules: ((:EXECUTABLE-COUNTERPART CREATE-ST$A)
(:EXECUTABLE-COUNTERPART ST$AP))
CREATE-ST{PRESERVED}
ACL2 !>>(DEFTHM FLD{CORRESPONDENCE}
(IMPLIES (ST$CORR ST$C ST)
(EQUAL (FLD$C ST$C) (FLD$A ST)))
:RULE-CLASSES NIL)
Q.E.D.
Summary
Form: ( DEFTHM FLD{CORRESPONDENCE} ...)
Rules: ((:DEFINITION FLD$A)
(:DEFINITION FLD$C)
(:DEFINITION ST$AP)
(:DEFINITION ST$CORR)
(:DEFINITION ST$CP)
(:EXECUTABLE-COUNTERPART TAU-SYSTEM))
FLD{CORRESPONDENCE}
ACL2 !>>(DEFTHM UPDATE-FLD-NIL-GOOD{CORRESPONDENCE}
(IMPLIES (ST$CORR ST$C ST)
(ST$CORR (UPDATE-FLD-NIL-GOOD$C ST$C)
(UPDATE-FLD-NIL-GOOD$A ST)))
:RULE-CLASSES NIL)
Goal'
Goal''
Q.E.D.
Summary
Form: ( DEFTHM UPDATE-FLD-NIL-GOOD{CORRESPONDENCE} ...)
Rules: ((:DEFINITION FLD$C)
(:DEFINITION LEN)
(:DEFINITION LENGTH)
(:DEFINITION NTH)
(:DEFINITION ST$AP)
(:DEFINITION ST$CORR)
(:DEFINITION ST$CP)
(:DEFINITION TRUE-LISTP)
(:DEFINITION UPDATE-FLD$C)
(:DEFINITION UPDATE-FLD-NIL-GOOD$A)
(:DEFINITION UPDATE-FLD-NIL-GOOD$C)
(:DEFINITION UPDATE-NTH)
(:EXECUTABLE-COUNTERPART BINARY-+)
(:EXECUTABLE-COUNTERPART CAR)
(:EXECUTABLE-COUNTERPART CDR)
(:EXECUTABLE-COUNTERPART CONSP)
(:EXECUTABLE-COUNTERPART EQUAL)
(:EXECUTABLE-COUNTERPART FLD$C)
(:EXECUTABLE-COUNTERPART LEN)
(:EXECUTABLE-COUNTERPART NOT)
(:EXECUTABLE-COUNTERPART ST$AP)
(:EXECUTABLE-COUNTERPART ST$CP)
(:EXECUTABLE-COUNTERPART UPDATE-NTH)
(:EXECUTABLE-COUNTERPART ZP)
(:FAKE-RUNE-FOR-TYPE-SET NIL)
(:REWRITE CDR-CONS)
(:REWRITE NTH-0-CONS))
UPDATE-FLD-NIL-GOOD{CORRESPONDENCE}
ACL2 !>>(DEFTHM UPDATE-FLD-NIL-GOOD{PRESERVED}
(IMPLIES (ST$AP ST)
(ST$AP (UPDATE-FLD-NIL-GOOD$A ST)))
:RULE-CLASSES NIL)
Q.E.D.
Summary
Form: ( DEFTHM UPDATE-FLD-NIL-GOOD{PRESERVED} ...)
Rules: ((:DEFINITION ST$AP)
(:DEFINITION UPDATE-FLD-NIL-GOOD$A)
(:EXECUTABLE-COUNTERPART IF)
(:EXECUTABLE-COUNTERPART ST$AP))
UPDATE-FLD-NIL-GOOD{PRESERVED}
ACL2 !>>(DEFTHM UPDATE-FLD-NIL-BAD{CORRESPONDENCE}
(IMPLIES (ST$CORR ST$C ST)
(ST$CORR (UPDATE-FLD-NIL-BAD$C ST$C)
(UPDATE-FLD-NIL-BAD$A ST)))
:RULE-CLASSES NIL)
Goal'
Goal''
Q.E.D.
Summary
Form: ( DEFTHM UPDATE-FLD-NIL-BAD{CORRESPONDENCE} ...)
Rules: ((:DEFINITION FLD$C)
(:DEFINITION LEN)
(:DEFINITION LENGTH)
(:DEFINITION NTH)
(:DEFINITION ST$AP)
(:DEFINITION ST$CORR)
(:DEFINITION ST$CP)
(:DEFINITION TRUE-LISTP)
(:DEFINITION UPDATE-FLD$C)
(:DEFINITION UPDATE-FLD-NIL-BAD$A)
(:DEFINITION UPDATE-FLD-NIL-BAD$C)
(:DEFINITION UPDATE-NTH)
(:EXECUTABLE-COUNTERPART BINARY-+)
(:EXECUTABLE-COUNTERPART CAR)
(:EXECUTABLE-COUNTERPART CDR)
(:EXECUTABLE-COUNTERPART CONSP)
(:EXECUTABLE-COUNTERPART EQUAL)
(:EXECUTABLE-COUNTERPART FLD$C)
(:EXECUTABLE-COUNTERPART LEN)
(:EXECUTABLE-COUNTERPART NOT)
(:EXECUTABLE-COUNTERPART ST$AP)
(:EXECUTABLE-COUNTERPART ST$CP)
(:EXECUTABLE-COUNTERPART UPDATE-FLD$C)
(:EXECUTABLE-COUNTERPART UPDATE-NTH)
(:EXECUTABLE-COUNTERPART ZP)
(:FAKE-RUNE-FOR-TYPE-SET NIL)
(:REWRITE CDR-CONS)
(:REWRITE NTH-0-CONS))
UPDATE-FLD-NIL-BAD{CORRESPONDENCE}
ACL2 !>>(DEFTHM UPDATE-FLD-NIL-BAD{PRESERVED}
(IMPLIES (ST$AP ST)
(ST$AP (UPDATE-FLD-NIL-BAD$A ST)))
:RULE-CLASSES NIL)
Q.E.D.
Summary
Form: ( DEFTHM UPDATE-FLD-NIL-BAD{PRESERVED} ...)
Rules: ((:DEFINITION ST$AP)
(:DEFINITION UPDATE-FLD-NIL-BAD$A)
(:EXECUTABLE-COUNTERPART IF)
(:EXECUTABLE-COUNTERPART ST$AP))
UPDATE-FLD-NIL-BAD{PRESERVED}
ACL2 !>>(DEFABSSTOBJ ST
:EXPORTS ((FLD)
(UPDATE-FLD-NIL-GOOD)
(UPDATE-FLD-NIL-BAD :PROTECT T)))
Summary
Form: ( DEFABSSTOBJ ST ...)
Rules: NIL
ST
ACL2 !>>(MAKE-EVENT (MV-LET (ERP VAL STATE)
(TRANS-EVAL '(UPDATE-FLD-NIL-BAD ST)
'TOP
STATE T)
(DECLARE (IGNORE ERP VAL))
(VALUE '(VALUE-TRIPLE :IRRELEVANT-VALUE))))
ACL2 Warning [User-stobjs-modified] in TOP: A call of the ACL2 evaluator
on the term (UPDATE-FLD-NIL-BAD ST) has modified the user stobj ST.
See :DOC user-stobjs-modified-warnings.
ACL2 Error in TOP: ACL2 cannot ev the call of non-executable function
STOP on argument list:
NIL
To debug see :DOC print-gv, see :DOC trace, and see :DOC wet.
Summary
Form: ( MAKE-EVENT (MV-LET ...))
Rules: NIL
Warnings: User-stobjs-modified
:IRRELEVANT-VALUE
ACL2 Error in CHK-ABSSTOBJ-INVARIANTS: Possible invariance violation
for an abstract stobj!
**PROCEED AT YOUR OWN RISK.**
To proceed, evaluate the following form.
:CONTINUE-FROM-ILLEGAL-STATE
See :DOC set-absstobj-debug.
[Illegal-State] >>(+ 3 4)
ACL2 Error in LD-FILTER-COMMAND: You are still in an illegal state!
See :DOC illegal-state. You can submit the form
:CONTINUE-FROM-ILLEGAL-STATE
to continue -- AT YOUR OWN RISK.
[Illegal-State] >>:CONTINUE-FROM-ILLEGAL-STATE
:CONTINUING
ACL2 !>>(+ 3 4)
7
ACL2 !>>(ASSERT-EVENT (EQUAL (FLD ST) T))
:PASSED
ACL2 !>>(MAKE-EVENT (MV-LET (ERP VAL STATE)
(TRANS-EVAL '(UPDATE-FLD-NIL-GOOD ST)
'TOP
STATE T)
(DECLARE (IGNORE ERP VAL))
(VALUE '(VALUE-TRIPLE :IRRELEVANT-VALUE))))
ACL2 Warning [User-stobjs-modified] in TOP: A call of the ACL2 evaluator
on the term (UPDATE-FLD-NIL-GOOD ST) has modified the user stobj ST.
See :DOC user-stobjs-modified-warnings.
Summary
Form: ( MAKE-EVENT (MV-LET ...))
Rules: NIL
Warnings: User-stobjs-modified
:IRRELEVANT-VALUE
ACL2 !>>(ASSERT-EVENT (EQUAL (FLD ST) NIL))
:PASSED
ACL2 !>>(LOCAL (SET-ABSSTOBJ-DEBUG T))
T
ACL2 !>>(MAKE-EVENT (MV-LET (ERP VAL STATE)
(TRANS-EVAL '(UPDATE-FLD-NIL-BAD ST)
'TOP
STATE T)
(DECLARE (IGNORE ERP VAL))
(VALUE '(VALUE-TRIPLE :IRRELEVANT-VALUE))))
ACL2 Warning [User-stobjs-modified] in TOP: A call of the ACL2 evaluator
on the term (UPDATE-FLD-NIL-BAD ST) has modified the user stobj ST.
See :DOC user-stobjs-modified-warnings.
ACL2 Error in TOP: ACL2 cannot ev the call of non-executable function
STOP on argument list:
NIL
To debug see :DOC print-gv, see :DOC trace, and see :DOC wet.
Summary
Form: ( MAKE-EVENT (MV-LET ...))
Rules: NIL
Warnings: User-stobjs-modified
:IRRELEVANT-VALUE
ACL2 Error in CHK-ABSSTOBJ-INVARIANTS: Possible invariance violation
for an abstract stobj!
**PROCEED AT YOUR OWN RISK.**
To proceed, evaluate the following form.
:CONTINUE-FROM-ILLEGAL-STATE
See :DOC set-absstobj-debug.
Evaluation was aborted under a call of abstract stobj export
UPDATE-FLD-NIL-BAD.
[Illegal-State] >>(CONTINUE-FROM-ILLEGAL-STATE)
:CONTINUING
ACL2 !>>(WITH-OUTPUT :OFF
:ALL (DEFEVALUATOR EVL EVL-LIST ((EQUAL X Y))))
Goal'
Goal''
Subgoal 3
Subgoal 3'
Subgoal 2
Subgoal 2'
Subgoal 1
Subgoal 1'
Subgoal *1/2
Subgoal *1/1
Subgoal *1/2
Subgoal *1/1
Subgoal 2
Subgoal 1
Subgoal 2
Subgoal 1
Goal'
Subgoal 2
Subgoal 1
(EVL EVL-LIST)
ACL2 !>>(DEFUN SIMPLE-CL-PROC (CL TERM ST)
(DECLARE (XARGS :STOBJS ST)
(IGNORE TERM))
(LET ((ST (UPDATE-FLD-NIL-BAD ST)))
(MV NIL (LIST CL) ST)))
Since SIMPLE-CL-PROC is non-recursive, its admission is trivial. We
observe that the type of SIMPLE-CL-PROC is described by the theorem
(AND (CONSP (SIMPLE-CL-PROC CL TERM ST))
(TRUE-LISTP (SIMPLE-CL-PROC CL TERM ST))).
We used primitive type reasoning and the :type-prescription rule
UPDATE-FLD-NIL-BAD.
(SIMPLE-CL-PROC * * ST) => (MV * * ST).
Computing the guard conjecture for SIMPLE-CL-PROC....
The guard conjecture for SIMPLE-CL-PROC is trivial to prove. SIMPLE-CL-PROC
is compliant with Common Lisp.
Summary
Form: ( DEFUN SIMPLE-CL-PROC ...)
Rules: ((:FAKE-RUNE-FOR-TYPE-SET NIL)
(:TYPE-PRESCRIPTION UPDATE-FLD-NIL-BAD))
SIMPLE-CL-PROC
ACL2 !>>(DEFTHM
CORRECTNESS-OF-SIMPLE-CL-PROC
(IMPLIES
(AND
(PSEUDO-TERM-LISTP CL)
(ALISTP A)
(EVL
(CONJOIN-CLAUSES (CLAUSES-RESULT (SIMPLE-CL-PROC CL TERM ST)))
A))
(EVL (DISJOIN CL) A))
:RULE-CLASSES :CLAUSE-PROCESSOR)
Goal'
Q.E.D.
Summary
Form: ( DEFTHM CORRECTNESS-OF-SIMPLE-CL-PROC ...)
Rules: ((:DEFINITION CLAUSES-RESULT)
(:DEFINITION CONJOIN)
(:DEFINITION CONJOIN-CLAUSES)
(:DEFINITION DISJOIN-LST)
(:DEFINITION SIMPLE-CL-PROC)
(:EXECUTABLE-COUNTERPART CONSP)
(:EXECUTABLE-COUNTERPART DISJOIN-LST)
(:FAKE-RUNE-FOR-TYPE-SET NIL)
(:REWRITE CAR-CONS)
(:REWRITE CDR-CONS))
CORRECTNESS-OF-SIMPLE-CL-PROC
ACL2 !>>(INCLUDE-BOOK "std/testing/must-fail"
:DIR :SYSTEM)
Summary
Form: ( INCLUDE-BOOK "std/testing/must-fail" ...)
Rules: NIL
"[books]/std/testing/must-fail.lisp"
ACL2 !>>(MUST-FAIL (THM (EQUAL X X)
:HINTS (("Goal" :CLAUSE-PROCESSOR SIMPLE-CL-PROC))))
Summary
Form: ( MAKE-EVENT (QUOTE ...) ...)
Rules: NIL
T
ACL2 Error in CHK-ABSSTOBJ-INVARIANTS: Possible invariance violation
for an abstract stobj!
**PROCEED AT YOUR OWN RISK.**
To proceed, evaluate the following form.
:CONTINUE-FROM-ILLEGAL-STATE
See :DOC set-absstobj-debug.
Evaluation was aborted under a call of abstract stobj export
UPDATE-FLD-NIL-BAD.
[Illegal-State] >>(CONTINUE-FROM-ILLEGAL-STATE)
:CONTINUING
ACL2 !>>(WITH-OUTPUT
:OFF (ERROR SUMMARY)
(THM
(EQUAL X X)
:HINTS (("Goal" :INSTRUCTIONS ((CL-PROC :FUNCTION SIMPLE-CL-PROC
:HINT NIL))))))
ACL2 Error [Failure] in ( THM ...): See :DOC failure.
ACL2 Error in CHK-ABSSTOBJ-INVARIANTS: Possible invariance violation
for an abstract stobj!
**PROCEED AT YOUR OWN RISK.**
To proceed, evaluate the following form.
:CONTINUE-FROM-ILLEGAL-STATE
See :DOC set-absstobj-debug.
Evaluation was aborted under a call of abstract stobj export
UPDATE-FLD-NIL-BAD.
[Illegal-State] >>(CONTINUE-FROM-ILLEGAL-STATE)
:CONTINUING
ACL2 !>>(DEFTTAG :BOGUS-CERT)
:BOGUS-CERT
ACL2 !>>(REMOVE-UNTOUCHABLE ILLEGAL-TO-CERTIFY-MESSAGE NIL)
Summary
Form: ( REMOVE-UNTOUCHABLE ILLEGAL-TO-CERTIFY-MESSAGE NIL)
Rules: NIL
ILLEGAL-TO-CERTIFY-MESSAGE
ACL2 !>>(MAKE-EVENT (PPROGN (F-PUT-GLOBAL 'ILLEGAL-TO-CERTIFY-MESSAGE
NIL STATE)
(VALUE '(VALUE-TRIPLE :CERTIFICATION-MADE-OK))))
Summary
Form: ( MAKE-EVENT (PPROGN ...))
Rules: NIL
:CERTIFICATION-MADE-OK
ACL2 !>>(DEFTTAG NIL)
NIL
ACL2 !>>(VALUE-TRIPLE "Completed")
"Completed"
ACL2 !>>Bye.
|
