1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
|
; Milawa - A Reflective Theorem Prover
; Copyright (C) 2005-2009 Kookamara LLC
;
; Contact:
;
; Kookamara LLC
; 11410 Windermere Meadows
; Austin, TX 78759, USA
; http://www.kookamara.com/
;
; License: (An MIT/X11-style license)
;
; Permission is hereby granted, free of charge, to any person obtaining a
; copy of this software and associated documentation files (the "Software"),
; to deal in the Software without restriction, including without limitation
; the rights to use, copy, modify, merge, publish, distribute, sublicense,
; and/or sell copies of the Software, and to permit persons to whom the
; Software is furnished to do so, subject to the following conditions:
;
; The above copyright notice and this permission notice shall be included in
; all copies or substantial portions of the Software.
;
; THE SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED "AS IS", WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR
; IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY,
; FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE AND NONINFRINGEMENT. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE
; AUTHORS OR COPYRIGHT HOLDERS BE LIABLE FOR ANY CLAIM, DAMAGES OR OTHER
; LIABILITY, WHETHER IN AN ACTION OF CONTRACT, TORT OR OTHERWISE, ARISING
; FROM, OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH THE SOFTWARE OR THE USE OR OTHER
; DEALINGS IN THE SOFTWARE.
;
; Original author: Jared Davis <jared@kookamara.com>
(in-package "MILAWA")
(include-book "fuse")
(%interactive)
(defthm equal-of-first-index-and-n-when-len-alt
;; BOZO put this somewhere better.
(implies (equal (len x) n)
(equal (equal n (first-index a x))
(not (memberp a x)))))
(%autoprove equal-of-first-index-and-n-when-len-alt
(%use (%instance (%thm equal-of-first-index-and-n-when-len))))
(%defderiv build.dual-substitution-lemma-1)
(%autoadmit build.flag-dual-substitution)
(%autoadmit build.dual-substitution)
(%autoadmit build.dual-substitution-list)
(%autoprove definition-of-build.dual-substitution
(%restrict default build.flag-dual-substitution (equal x 'x))
(%enable default
build.dual-substitution
build.dual-substitution-list))
(%autoprove definition-of-build.dual-substitution-list
(%restrict default build.flag-dual-substitution (equal x 'x))
(%enable default
build.dual-substitution
build.dual-substitution-list))
(%autoprove build.flag-dual-substitution-of-term-removal
(%enable default build.dual-substitution))
(%autoprove build.flag-dual-substitution-of-list-removal
(%enable default build.dual-substitution-list))
(%autoprove build.dual-substitution-under-iff
(%restrict default definition-of-build.dual-substitution (equal x 'x)))
(%autoprove build.dual-substitution-list-when-not-consp
(%restrict default definition-of-build.dual-substitution-list (equal x 'x)))
(%autoprove build.dual-substitution-list-of-cons
(%restrict default definition-of-build.dual-substitution-list (equal x '(cons a x))))
(%autoprove len-of-build.dual-substitution-list
(%cdr-induction x))
(defmacro %build.flag-dual-substitution-induction (flag x vars proofs)
`(%induct (rank ,x)
((and (equal ,flag 'term)
(logic.constantp ,x))
nil)
((and (equal ,flag 'term)
(logic.variablep ,x))
nil)
((and (equal ,flag 'term)
(logic.functionp ,x))
(((,flag 'list)
(,x (logic.function-args ,x))
(,vars ,vars)
(,proofs ,proofs))))
((and (equal ,flag 'term)
(logic.lambdap ,x))
(((,flag 'list)
(,x (logic.lambda-actuals ,x))
(,vars ,vars)
(,proofs ,proofs))
((,flag 'term)
(,x (logic.lambda-body ,x))
(,vars (logic.lambda-formals ,x))
(,proofs (build.dual-substitution-list (logic.lambda-actuals ,x) ,vars ,proofs)))))
((and (equal ,flag 'term)
(not (logic.constantp ,x))
(not (logic.variablep ,x))
(not (logic.functionp ,x))
(not (logic.lambdap ,x)))
nil)
((and (not (equal ,flag 'term))
(consp ,x))
(((,flag 'term) (,x (car ,x)) (,vars ,vars) (,proofs ,proofs))
((,flag 'list) (,x (cdr ,x)) (,vars ,vars) (,proofs ,proofs))))
((and (not (equal ,flag 'term))
(not (consp ,x)))
nil)))
(%autoprove lemma-for-forcing-logic.appealp-of-build.dual-substitution
;; with manual induction -- 100m; with autoinduction -- 176m
(%build.flag-dual-substitution-induction flag x vars proofs)
(%auto :strategy (cleanup urewrite split))
(%restrict default definition-of-build.dual-substitution (equal x 'x))
(%auto :strategy (cleanup urewrite split)))
(%autoprove forcing-logic.appealp-of-build.dual-substitution
(%use (%instance (%thm lemma-for-forcing-logic.appealp-of-build.dual-substitution)
(flag 'term))))
(%autoprove forcing-logic.appealp-listp-of-build.dual-substitution-list
(%use (%instance (%thm lemma-for-forcing-logic.appealp-of-build.dual-substitution)
(flag 'list))))
(%autoprove forcing-logic.conclusion-of-build.dual-substitution
(%use (%instance (%thm lemma-for-forcing-logic.appealp-of-build.dual-substitution)
(flag 'term))))
(%autoprove forcing-logic.strip-conclusions-of-build.dual-substitution-list
(%use (%instance (%thm lemma-for-forcing-logic.appealp-of-build.dual-substitution)
(flag 'list))))
(%autoprove lemma-for-forcing-logic.proofp-of-build.dual-substitution
;; (%build.flag-dual-substitution-induction flag x vars proofs)
(%autoinduct build.flag-dual-substitution)
(%auto :strategy (cleanup urewrite split))
(%restrict default definition-of-build.dual-substitution (equal x 'x))
(%auto :strategy (cleanup urewrite split)))
(%autoprove forcing-logic.proofp-of-build.dual-substitution
(%use (%instance (%thm lemma-for-forcing-logic.proofp-of-build.dual-substitution)
(flag 'term)))
(%auto :strategy (cleanup urewrite split)))
(%autoprove forcing-logic.proof-listp-of-build.dual-substitution-list
(%use (%instance (%thm lemma-for-forcing-logic.proofp-of-build.dual-substitution)
(flag 'list)))
(%auto :strategy (cleanup urewrite split)))
(defsection build.lambda-pequal-by-args
(%autoadmit build.lambda-pequal-by-args)
(local (%enable default build.lambda-pequal-by-args))
(%autoprove build.lambda-pequal-by-args-under-iff)
(%autoprove forcing-logic.appealp-of-build.lambda-pequal-by-args)
(%autoprove forcing-logic.conclusion-of-build.lambda-pequal-by-args)
(%autoprove forcing-logic.proofp-of-build.lambda-pequal-by-args))
(defsection build.lambda-pequal-by-args-okp
(%autoadmit build.lambda-pequal-by-args-okp)
(%autoprove booleanp-of-build.lambda-pequal-by-args-okp
(%enable default build.lambda-pequal-by-args-okp))
(%autoprove build.lambda-pequal-by-args-okp-of-logic.appeal-identity
(%enable default build.lambda-pequal-by-args-okp))
(local (%enable default backtracking-logic.formula-atblp-rules))
(local (%disable default
forcing-logic.formula-atblp-rules
forcing-lookup-of-logic.function-name-free))
(%autoprove lemma-1-for-soundness-of-build.lambda-pequal-by-args-okp
(%enable default build.lambda-pequal-by-args-okp))
(%autoprove lemma-2-for-soundness-of-build.lambda-pequal-by-args-okp
(%enable default build.lambda-pequal-by-args-okp))
(%autoprove forcing-soundness-of-build.lambda-pequal-by-args-okp
(%enable default
lemma-1-for-soundness-of-build.lambda-pequal-by-args-okp
lemma-2-for-soundness-of-build.lambda-pequal-by-args-okp)
(%use (%instance (%thm forcing-logic.provablep-when-logic.proofp)
(x (build.lambda-pequal-by-args
(first (logic.extras x))
(second (logic.extras x))
(logic.provable-list-witness (logic.strip-conclusions (logic.subproofs x))
axioms thms atbl)))))
(%auto :strategy (cleanup split crewrite))
(%enable default build.lambda-pequal-by-args-okp)
(%auto :strategy (cleanup split crewrite))))
|
