1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415
|
; Fully Ordered Finite Sets
; Copyright (C) 2003-2012 Kookamara LLC
;
; Contact:
;
; Kookamara LLC
; 11410 Windermere Meadows
; Austin, TX 78759, USA
; http://www.kookamara.com/
;
; License: (An MIT/X11-style license)
;
; Permission is hereby granted, free of charge, to any person obtaining a
; copy of this software and associated documentation files (the "Software"),
; to deal in the Software without restriction, including without limitation
; the rights to use, copy, modify, merge, publish, distribute, sublicense,
; and/or sell copies of the Software, and to permit persons to whom the
; Software is furnished to do so, subject to the following conditions:
;
; The above copyright notice and this permission notice shall be included in
; all copies or substantial portions of the Software.
;
; THE SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED "AS IS", WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR
; IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY,
; FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE AND NONINFRINGEMENT. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE
; AUTHORS OR COPYRIGHT HOLDERS BE LIABLE FOR ANY CLAIM, DAMAGES OR OTHER
; LIABILITY, WHETHER IN AN ACTION OF CONTRACT, TORT OR OTHERWISE, ARISING
; FROM, OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH THE SOFTWARE OR THE USE OR OTHER
; DEALINGS IN THE SOFTWARE.
;
; Original author: Jared Davis <jared@kookamara.com>
; computed-hints.lisp
;
; We provide support for the development of "pick a point" style proofs through
; computed hints.
(in-package "COMPUTED-HINTS")
; Introduction
;
; Suppose we have some predicate, P, of any number of arguments. A natural
; operation is to extend this predicate to every element of a list, set, or
; other collection. In other words, we would like to know if every element in
; the set, list, tree, or whatever has the property when applied to arguments.
;
; For example, we might have the predicate:
;
; (defun integer-lessp (a b)
; (and (integerp a)
; (< a b)))
;
; We could now extend this concept to an entire list, to ask if every element
; in the list was an integer that is less than b. The function might be
; written as:
;
; (defun list-integer-lessp (a-list b)
; (declare (xargs :guard (true-listp a-list)))
; (or (endp a-list)
; (and (integer-lessp (car a-list) b)
; (list-integer-lessp (cdr a-list) b))))
;
; Similarly, we might want to map the function across sets or other types of
; collections.
;
; Take an abstract mathematical view for a moment. Given some predicate P,
; what we would really like to do is be able to express the idea that given
; some collection x, every element of x satisfies P. In other words, we want
; to define:
;
; (collection-P x [args]) = forall a in x, (P x [args])
;
; And indeed, it would be nice to be working with this very abstract
; mathematical definition, for which we will not need to make inductive
; arguments. Unfortunately, because all variables in ACL2's rewrite rules are
; implicitly universally quantified, we cannot express the above as a rewrite
; rule.
;
; However, through the use of constrained function symbols and functional
; instantiation, we can effectively accomplish the above reduction when it
; suits our purposes. And, the process can be automated through the use of
; computed hints. Overall, this is not as nice as working with a pure rewrite
; rule, and in fact has some unfortunate limitations. However, it does turn
; out to be very broadly applicable and invaluable for reasoning about set
; theoretic concepts, where concepts such as "subset" are really nothing more
; than the extension of the predicate "in" across a set.
;
; Moreover, the reduction that we set out to achieve will reduce (collection-P
; x [args]) to the following implication:
;
; (implies (in a x)
; (P a [args]))
;
; I call this a "pick a point" reduction, because it is similar to and takes
; its inspiration from the well known set theoretic technique of picking an
; arbitrary element (or point) in one set, then showing it is also a member of
; another set.
; Preliminaries
;
; We will make minor use of the rewriting system developed in instance.lisp.
; We also enter program mode, because we are not interested in reasoning about
; these functions.
(include-book "instance")
(program)
; Tagging
;
; Suppose that we have (collection-P x a0 a1 ... an) to a simpler argument. We
; begin by defining a synonym for collection-P, e.g.,
;
; (defun collection-P-tag (x a0 a1 ... an)
; (collection-P x a0 a1 ... an))
;
; Now we instruct the theorem prover to rewrite instances of conclusion into
; conclusion-tag, as long as we are not backchaining and as long as conclusion
; occurs as the goal. For example,
;
; (defthm tagging-theorem
; (implies
; (and (syntaxp (rewriting-goal-lit mfc state))
; (syntaxp (rewriting-conc-lit `(collection-P ,x ,a0 ... ,an)
; mfc state)))
; (equal (collection-P x a0 ... an)
; (collection-P-tag x a0 ... an))))
;
; This theorem is trivial to prove, since collection-P-tag is merely a synonym
; for collection-P. After the theorem is proven, collection-P-tag should be
; disabled.
(defun rewriting-goal-lit (mfc state)
(declare (xargs :stobjs state)
(ignore state))
(null (mfc-ancestors mfc)))
(defun rewriting-conc-lit (term mfc state)
(declare (xargs :stobjs state)
(ignore state))
(let ((clause (mfc-clause mfc)))
(member-equal term (last clause))))
; Computing a Hint
;
; Now, what we are going to do next is create a computed hint that will look
; for instances of a trigger, and if it sees one, we will try to provide a
; functional instantiation hint. This takes some work. Our computed hint
; function is called as ACL2 is working to simplify terms, and it is allowed to
; examine the current clause. The current clause will be a a disjunction of
; literals. For example,
;
; (a ^ b ^ ...) => P is (~a v ~b v ... v P)
; (a v b v ...) => P is subgoal1: (~a v P), sg2: (~b v P), ...
;
; Our first step is to see if our computed hint should even be applied to this
; clause. We only allow the hint to be applied if the current clause is stable
; under simplification, i.e., if other attempts to prove it have failed. At
; that point, we check the clause to see if our trigger occurs as a term within
; it. If so, the tagging theorem has applied and thinks we should try to use
; our computed hint!
;
; We check for the existence of our trigger using the following function,
; (harvest-trigger clause trigger-fn), which extracts all the terms from clause
; whose function symbol is trigger-fn, and returns them as a list.
;
; Now, our intention is to functionally instantiate the theorem in question.
; To do this, we need to provide values for the hypotheses and arguments a0
; ... an.
;
; In order to recover the hypotheses, we first remove from the clause all of
; our trigger terms. We then negate each of the remaining literals as they
; occur in the clause. And, if there are more than one of them, we are going
; to AND their negations together. This is done by the functions
; others-to-negated-list, and others-to-hyps.
;
; For example, if we originally had the conjecture (a ^ b ^ ...) => P Then this
; became the clause: (~a v ~b v ... v P), which is represented by the list
; ((not a) (not b) ... P). Suppose that P was our trigger term. We remove P
; from the clause, yielding ((not a) (not b) ...), and then we negate all of
; these literals, creating the list (a b ...). We now and these together,
; creating the the term (and a b ...), which was our original hypotheses!
(defun harvest-trigger (clause trigger-fn)
(if (endp clause)
nil
(if (eq (caar clause) trigger-fn)
(cons (car clause) (harvest-trigger (cdr clause) trigger-fn))
(harvest-trigger (cdr clause) trigger-fn))))
(defun others-to-negated-list (others)
(if (endp others)
nil
(if (equal (caar others) 'not) ; don't create ugly double not's
(cons (second (car others))
(others-to-negated-list (cdr others)))
(cons (list 'not (car others))
(others-to-negated-list (cdr others))))))
(defun others-to-hyps (others)
(if (endp others)
t
(let ((negated (others-to-negated-list others)))
(if (endp (cdr negated)) ; don't wrap single literals in and's
(car negated)
(cons 'and (others-to-negated-list others))))))
; Absolute Restrictions:
;
; Collection predicate must have a first argument which is the collection to
; traverse!!
;
; Need to be able to create hint for predicate as well.
; Building Hints
;
; Our ultimate goal now is to be able to create functional instantiation hints
; for each trigger which was found. In other words, we now have a set of
; triggers which look like the following:
;
; ((collection-P-tag col1 [extra-args1])
; (collection-P-tag col2 [extra-args2])
; ...)
;
; We want to instantiate generic theorems of the form:
;
; (defthm generic-theorem
; (implies (hyps)
; (collection-P-tag (collection) [extra-args])))
;
; Where we have the following generic constraint:
;
; (implies (hyps)
; (implies (in a (collection))
; (predicate a)))
;
; So, the functional instantiation hints we want to create will look like the
; following:
;
; (:functional-instance generic-theorem
; (hyps (lambda () [substitution for hyps]))
; (collection (lambda () [substitution for collection]))
; (predicate (lambda (x) [substitution for predicate]))
; (collection-P (lambda (x) [substitution for collection-P])))
;
; Lets consider how we can build these substitutions for some trigger =
; (collection-P-tag col1 [extra-args1]). Some of this is easy:
;
; The substitution for hyps is actually built using the process described
; above, e.g., they are extracted from the clause and eventually restored to
; normal using others-to-hyps, so I will not spend any time on them.
;
; The collection is simply (second trigger), since we require that the
; collection predicate has the collection as its first argument.
;
; The substitution for collection-P is also fairly easy. Since we require
; that the collection function's first argument is the collection under
; examination, we simply need to write (lambda (?x) (actual-collection-P ?x
; [extra-args])), where the extra arguments are taken from the trigger we are
; looking at.
;
; This leaves us with predicate. The substitution for predicate is
; difficult, because we want to support very flexible predicates involving
; many arguments and various weird terms. To do this, we will allow the user
; to provide a rewrite rule that says how to handle the predicate.
;
; In other words, given the trigger (trigger-term col a0 a1 a2 ... an) we
; will create the following "base predicate" to rewrite:
;
; (predicate ?x a0 a1 a2 ... an)
;
; Where "predicate" is literally the name of the generic predicate. The user
; can then provide a substitution such as:
;
; (predicate ?x ?y) -> (not (integer-lessp ?x ?y))
;
; And this will transform the above into the desired result.
(defun build-hint (trigger ; list, the actual trigger to use
generic-theorem ; symbol, the name of generic-theorem
generic-hyps ; symbol, the name of (hyps)
generic-collection ; symbol, the name of (collection)
generic-predicate ; symbol, the name of predicate
generic-collection-P ; symbol, the name of collection-P
collection-P-sub ; symbol, name of actual collection-P
hyps-sub ; the computed substitution for hyps
predicate-rewrite) ; rewrite rule for predicate
(let* ((base-pred (cons generic-predicate (cons '?x (cddr trigger))))
(pred-sub (instance-rewrite base-pred predicate-rewrite)))
`(:functional-instance
,generic-theorem
(,generic-hyps
(lambda () ,hyps-sub))
(,generic-collection
(lambda () ,(second trigger)))
(,generic-collection-P
(lambda (?x) ,(cons collection-P-sub (cons '?x (cddr trigger)))))
(,generic-predicate
(lambda (?x) ,pred-sub)))))
(defun build-hints (triggers
generic-theorem
generic-hyps
generic-collection
generic-predicate
generic-collection-P
collection-P-sub
hyps-sub
predicate-rewrite)
(if (endp triggers)
nil
(cons (build-hint (car triggers)
generic-theorem
generic-hyps
generic-collection
generic-predicate
generic-collection-P
collection-P-sub
hyps-sub
predicate-rewrite)
(build-hints (cdr triggers)
generic-theorem
generic-hyps
generic-collection
generic-predicate
generic-collection-P
collection-P-sub
hyps-sub
predicate-rewrite))))
; Of course, some of those hints can be computed. Here we write a function to
; actually provide these hints and install the computed hint function.
(defun automate-instantiation-fn (new-hint-name
generic-theorem
generic-hyps
generic-collection
generic-predicate
generic-collection-P
collection-P-sub
predicate-rewrite
trigger-symbol
tagging-theorem)
`(encapsulate ()
(defun ,new-hint-name (id clause world stable)
(declare (xargs :mode :program)
(ignore id world))
(if (not stable)
nil
(let ((triggers (harvest-trigger clause ,trigger-symbol)))
(if (not triggers)
nil
(let* ((others (set-difference-equal clause triggers))
(hyps (others-to-hyps others))
(fi-hints (build-hints triggers
,generic-theorem
,generic-hyps
,generic-collection
,generic-predicate
,generic-collection-P
,collection-P-sub
hyps
,predicate-rewrite))
(hints (list :use fi-hints
:expand triggers)))
(prog2$ (cw "~|~%Attempting to discharge subgoal by a ~
pick-a-point strategy; disable ~x0 to ~
prevent this.~%~%"
,tagging-theorem)
hints))))))
(add-default-hints!
'((,new-hint-name id clause world stable-under-simplificationp)))
))
(defmacro automate-instantiation (&key new-hint-name
generic-theorem
generic-hyps
generic-collection
generic-predicate
generic-collection-predicate
actual-collection-predicate
predicate-rewrite
actual-trigger
tagging-theorem)
(automate-instantiation-fn new-hint-name
(list 'quote generic-theorem)
(list 'quote generic-hyps)
(list 'quote generic-collection)
(list 'quote generic-predicate)
(list 'quote generic-collection-predicate)
(list 'quote actual-collection-predicate)
(list 'quote predicate-rewrite)
(list 'quote actual-trigger)
(list 'quote tagging-theorem)))
|