File: basic-rc.html

package info (click to toggle)
arch 1.0pre15-1
  • links: PTS
  • area: main
  • in suites: woody
  • size: 20,180 kB
  • ctags: 4,560
  • sloc: ansic: 64,410; sh: 29,168; lisp: 1,896; awk: 1,044; makefile: 484; sed: 26
file content (1071 lines) | stat: -rw-r--r-- 24,454 bytes parent folder | download
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
543
544
545
546
547
548
549
550
551
552
553
554
555
556
557
558
559
560
561
562
563
564
565
566
567
568
569
570
571
572
573
574
575
576
577
578
579
580
581
582
583
584
585
586
587
588
589
590
591
592
593
594
595
596
597
598
599
600
601
602
603
604
605
606
607
608
609
610
611
612
613
614
615
616
617
618
619
620
621
622
623
624
625
626
627
628
629
630
631
632
633
634
635
636
637
638
639
640
641
642
643
644
645
646
647
648
649
650
651
652
653
654
655
656
657
658
659
660
661
662
663
664
665
666
667
668
669
670
671
672
673
674
675
676
677
678
679
680
681
682
683
684
685
686
687
688
689
690
691
692
693
694
695
696
697
698
699
700
701
702
703
704
705
706
707
708
709
710
711
712
713
714
715
716
717
718
719
720
721
722
723
724
725
726
727
728
729
730
731
732
733
734
735
736
737
738
739
740
741
742
743
744
745
746
747
748
749
750
751
752
753
754
755
756
757
758
759
760
761
762
763
764
765
766
767
768
769
770
771
772
773
774
775
776
777
778
779
780
781
782
783
784
785
786
787
788
789
790
791
792
793
794
795
796
797
798
799
800
801
802
803
804
805
806
807
808
809
810
811
812
813
814
815
816
817
818
819
820
821
822
823
824
825
826
827
828
829
830
831
832
833
834
835
836
837
838
839
840
841
842
843
844
845
846
847
848
849
850
851
852
853
854
855
856
857
858
859
860
861
862
863
864
865
866
867
868
869
870
871
872
873
874
875
876
877
878
879
880
881
882
883
884
885
886
887
888
889
890
891
892
893
894
895
896
897
898
899
900
901
902
903
904
905
906
907
908
909
910
911
912
913
914
915
916
917
918
919
920
921
922
923
924
925
926
927
928
929
930
931
932
933
934
935
936
937
938
939
940
941
942
943
944
945
946
947
948
949
950
951
952
953
954
955
956
957
958
959
960
961
962
963
964
965
966
967
968
969
970
971
972
973
974
975
976
977
978
979
980
981
982
983
984
985
986
987
988
989
990
991
992
993
994
995
996
997
998
999
1000
1001
1002
1003
1004
1005
1006
1007
1008
1009
1010
1011
1012
1013
1014
1015
1016
1017
1018
1019
1020
1021
1022
1023
1024
1025
1026
1027
1028
1029
1030
1031
1032
1033
1034
1035
1036
1037
1038
1039
1040
1041
1042
1043
1044
1045
1046
1047
1048
1049
1050
1051
1052
1053
1054
1055
1056
1057
1058
1059
1060
1061
1062
1063
1064
1065
1066
1067
1068
1069
1070
1071
<html>
<head>
<title>Basic Revision Control</title>
</head>
<body>

<a name="Basic_Revision_Control"></a>

<a href="http://www.regexps.com">The Hackerlab at <code>regexps.com</code></a>

<h2 align=center>Basic Revision Control</h2>




<small>
<b>up: </b><a href="arch.html#arch">arch</a></br>
<b>next: </b><a href="basic-branching-and-merging.html#Basic_Branching_and_Merging">Basic Branching and Merging</a></br>

<b>prev: </b><a href="development-paths.html#Development_Paths">Development Paths</a></br>

</small>
<br>






<p>This chapter introduces the fundamental operations for storing
revisions in archives, retrieving them, doing clever things with
patches, and managing project trees for archived projects.
</p><ul>
<li><a href="basic-rc.html#The_First_Revision">The First Revision</a></li>
<li><a href="basic-rc.html#Successive_Revisions">Successive Revisions</a></li>
<li><a href="basic-rc.html#Patch_Levels_and_Development_Phases">Patch Levels and Development Phases</a></li>
<li><a href="basic-rc.html#Getting_a_Revision">Getting a Revision</a></li>
<li><a href="basic-rc.html#Optimizing_Archives_for_get">Optimizing Archives for get</a></li>
<li><a href="basic-rc.html#Finding_Out_What_Changed">Finding Out What Changed</a></li>
<li><a href="basic-rc.html#The_whats-missing_Command">The whats-missing Command</a></li>
<li><a href="basic-rc.html#Update">Update</a></li>
<li><a href="basic-rc.html#Replay">Replay</a></li>
<li><a href="basic-rc.html#The_Next_Version">The Next Version</a></li>
</ul>

<hr>

<a name="The_First_Revision"></a>



<h3 align=center>The First Revision</h3>




<small>
<b>up: </b><a href="basic-rc.html#Basic_Revision_Control">Basic Revision Control</a></br>
<b>next: </b><a href="basic-rc.html#Successive_Revisions">Successive Revisions</a></br>


</small>
<br>






<p><a name="index-pt:0"></a>

</p><p>When beginning a new project, the first step is to check in the very
first revision of the tree.
</p><p><strong><u>Prepare the Archive</u></strong> We've already seen how to prepare the archive by
creating the category, branch, and version for the project (see
<a href="development-paths.html#Creating_a_Development_Path">Creating a Development Path</a>).  You have to perform those
steps before checking in the first revision:
</p><pre>
        % larch make-category CATEGORY
        % larch make-branch BRANCH
        % larch make-version VERSION

</pre>
<p><strong><u>Prepare the Project Tree</u></strong> We've also seen how to turn an ordinary
directory into a project tree using the <code>init-tree</code>
 command (see
<a href="project-trees.html#Initializing_a_Project_Tree">Initializing a Project Tree</a>).  And we've seen how to set the
default version of a project tree using <code>set-tree-version</code>
 (see
<a href="project-names.html#Labelling_Project_Trees">Labelling Project Trees</a>).  Both of these steps must be
completed before checking in the first revision:
</p><pre>
        % larch init-tree
        % larch set-tree-version VERSION-NAME

</pre>
<p>In addition, you must create for the project tree a &quot;patch log&quot; --
where log entries for revisions in the development path <code>VERSION-NAME</code>

will be stored:
</p><pre>
        % larch add-log VERSION-NAME

</pre>
<p>Patch logs are explained in detail in the next chapter.  For now, just
accept the necessity of that command on faith. 
</p><p><strong><u>Prepare a Log Message</u></strong> In the root of the project tree, the command:
</p><pre>
        % larch make-log 

</pre>
<p>creates a template for a log file (look for file whose name begins
with <code>++log</code>
).  The details of what should go in a log message are
project specific.  In general, the format of a log message uses
<code>RFC822</code>
 style headers followed by a free-form body.  When <code>arch</code>

stores a log message, it will add some headers of its own.
</p><p><strong><u>Archive the Tree</u></strong> Again, in the root of the project tree, use
the <code>import</code>
 command to archive the tree:
</p><pre>
        % larch import

</pre>
<p><code>import</code>
 will print the headers of the log message (including headers
added by <code>arch</code>
), store the tree in the archive (as a compressed tar
file), and update the patch log of the working directory to reflect
the commit.
</p><p>After commiting a revision to, say, <code>hello--devo--1.0</code>
, you can use
the command <code>revisions</code>
 to see a list of archived revisions:
</p><pre>
        % larch revisions hello--devo--1.0
        base-0

</pre>
<p><code>base-0</code>
 is the &quot;patch level name&quot; for the first revision.  Patch
levels are described in greater detail below.
</p>










<hr>

<a name="Successive_Revisions"></a>



<h3 align=center>Successive Revisions</h3>




<small>
<b>up: </b><a href="basic-rc.html#Basic_Revision_Control">Basic Revision Control</a></br>
<b>next: </b><a href="basic-rc.html#Patch_Levels_and_Development_Phases">Patch Levels and Development Phases</a></br>

<b>prev: </b><a href="basic-rc.html#The_First_Revision">The First Revision</a></br>

</small>
<br>






<p><a name="index-pt:1"></a>

</p><p>Suppose that you have continued to edit your working directory after
checking in the initial revision.  Successive revisions can be checked
in with the command <code>commit</code>
, issued at the root of the working
directory.  As with <code>import</code>
, you must first use <code>make-log</code>
 to
prepare a log message for each commit:
</p><pre>
        % larch make-log

</pre>
<pre>
        [...edit log message...]

</pre>
<pre>
        % larch commit
        [output omitted]

</pre>
<p>After several commits, you'll have a number of patch levels:
</p><pre>
        % larch revisions hello--devo--1.0
        base-0
        patch-1
        patch-2
        patch-3
        ...

</pre>
<p>As a point of interest, the base revision is stored as a compressed
tar file of the entire tree.  Each <code>patch-N</code>
 is stored as a compressed
tar file of just a patch set that describes how to derive that
revision from the previous revision.
</p>










<hr>

<a name="Patch_Levels_and_Development_Phases"></a>



<h3 align=center>Patch Levels and Development Phases</h3>




<small>
<b>up: </b><a href="basic-rc.html#Basic_Revision_Control">Basic Revision Control</a></br>
<b>next: </b><a href="basic-rc.html#Getting_a_Revision">Getting a Revision</a></br>

<b>prev: </b><a href="basic-rc.html#Successive_Revisions">Successive Revisions</a></br>

</small>
<br>






<p>Within a version, there is a sequence of revisions, each of which is a
different <em>
<a name="index-pt:2"></a>

patch level
</em>
.  Every patch level has a <em>
<a name="index-pt:3"></a>

patch level name
</em>
,
derived from the version name by adding a suffix:
</p><pre>
        hello--devo--1.0--base-0
        hello--devo--1.0--patch-1
        hello--devo--1.0--patch-2
        hello--devo--1.0--patch-3
        ...

</pre>
<p>Just as with version names, there is also such a thing as a <em>
<a name="index-pt:4"></a>

fully
qualified patch level name
</em>
:
</p><pre>
        joe.hacker@gnu.org--test-archive/hello--devo--1.0--patch-3

</pre>
<p>Development within a version may be optionally divided into four
phases: <em>
<a name="index-pt:5"></a>

base revision
</em>
, <em>
<a name="index-pt:6"></a>

pre-patches
</em>
, <em>
<a name="index-pt:7"></a>

version revision
</em>
, and
<em>
<a name="index-pt:8"></a>

post-patches
</em>
.  Conceptually, &quot;pre-patches&quot; are revisions made
before the version is &quot;done&quot;.  &quot;Post-patches&quot; are revisions made
after the version is done (e.g. &quot;bug fix patches&quot;).
</p><p>At the beginning of a development path is the <em>
<a name="index-pt:9"></a>

base revision
</em>

(called <code>base-0</code>
).  Between the pre-patch and post-patch phases is the
<em>
<a name="index-pt:10"></a>

version revision
</em>
 (called <code>version-0</code>
).  Post-patches have names like
<code>versionfix-1</code>
, <code>versionfix-2</code>
, etc.
</p><p>So the total sequence of revisions within a development path has the
form:
</p><pre>
        The Initial Revision:

</pre>
<pre>
                base-0

</pre>
<pre>
        Pre-Patches:

</pre>
<pre>
                patch-1
                patch-2
                patch-3
                ...
                patch-N

</pre>
<pre>
        The Version Revision:

</pre>
<pre>
                version-0

</pre>
<pre>
        Post-Patches:

</pre>
<pre>
                versionfix-1
                versionfix-2
                versionfix-3
                ...

</pre>
<p>Typically, the <code>version-0</code>
 revision is what would be released under
the version number and the post-patch revisions are fixes made after
the release.
</p><p>The ordinary <code>commit</code>
 command creates pre-patches (<code>patch-N</code>

revisions).
</p><p>To create the version revision, use <code>commit --seal</code>
:
</p><pre>
        % larch commit --seal

</pre>
<p>After the version revision exists, ordinary commit will no longer
work.  To create a post-patch revision, use <code>commit --fix</code>
:
</p><pre>
        % larch commit --fix

</pre>
<p>It is perhaps worth mentioning that patch level names can be sorted
easily using:
</p><pre>
       sort -t - -k 1,1 -k 2,2n

</pre>
<p>or in reverse:
</p><pre>
       sort -t - -k 1,1r -k 2,2rn

</pre>
<p>If you are familiar with other revision control systems, a four-phased
development process may at first seem somewhat arbitrary and
needlessly complicated.  Two points are worth mentioning:
</p><p>First, phased development is entirely optional.  Nothing requires you
to ever <code>--seal</code>
 a version, and if you never seal a version,
you never need to use <code>--fix</code>
.  Instead, every revision (after
<code>base-0</code>
) will be a <code>patch-N</code>
 revision.
</p><p>Second, phased development is a handy way to prevent accidents when
organizing more complex projects.  Sealing a version is a
way to set a flag that says, in effect, &quot;ordinary development in this
version has stopped -- you might not really want to make a new
revision here.&quot;  You can make a new revision if you insist (by
specifying <code>--fix</code>
), but the requirement that you insist helps alert
you to the fact that your new revision might need to be merged with
later versions of the same project; or that that version you are
revising has already been released.  Phased development is a
bookkeeping convenience: for the most part, <code>arch</code>
 treats all
revisions equally, regardless of their phase.
</p>










<hr>

<a name="Getting_a_Revision"></a>



<h3 align=center>Getting a Revision</h3>




<small>
<b>up: </b><a href="basic-rc.html#Basic_Revision_Control">Basic Revision Control</a></br>
<b>next: </b><a href="basic-rc.html#Optimizing_Archives_for_get">Optimizing Archives for get</a></br>

<b>prev: </b><a href="basic-rc.html#Patch_Levels_and_Development_Phases">Patch Levels and Development Phases</a></br>

</small>
<br>






<p>To retrieve a revision from an archive, use <code>larch get</code>
:
</p><pre>
        % larch get REVISION DIR

</pre>
<p>as in:
</p><pre>
        % larch get hello--devo--1.0--patch-4 hello

</pre>
<p>to retrieve the revision <code>patch-4</code>
 and store it in the new directory
<code>hello</code>
.
</p><p>An abbreviation can be used to obtain the most recent revision of a
version:
</p><pre>
        % larch get hello--devo--1.0 hello

</pre>
<p>or to obtain the most recent revsion of the highest-numbered version:
</p><pre>
        % larch get hello--devo hello

</pre>
<p>A fully-qualified name can be used to obtain a revision from someplace
other than the default archive:
</p><pre>
        % larch get joe.hacker@gnu.org--test-archive/hello--devo

</pre>











<hr>

<a name="Optimizing_Archives_for_get"></a>



<h3 align=center>Optimizing Archives for get</h3>




<small>
<b>up: </b><a href="basic-rc.html#Basic_Revision_Control">Basic Revision Control</a></br>
<b>next: </b><a href="basic-rc.html#Finding_Out_What_Changed">Finding Out What Changed</a></br>

<b>prev: </b><a href="basic-rc.html#Getting_a_Revision">Getting a Revision</a></br>

</small>
<br>






<p>The way that <code>get</code>
 ordinarilly works is that it searches backwards
from the desired revision to find the nearest full-source base
revision.  It gets the compressed tar file for that base revision and
creates a source tree.  Then, for each intermediate patch level, it
gets a compressed tar file of the patch set, uncompresses and un-tars
the patch-set, and applies the patch-set to the source tree.
</p><p>If there are many intermediate patch-sets, that process can be slow.  
In such cases, you can ask <code>arch</code>
 to cache a full-source copy of an
arbitrary revision, with the command:
</p><pre>
        % larch archive-cache-revision [ARCHIVE/]REVISION

</pre>
<p>That command first builds the requested revision, then it builds a
compressed tar file of the revision, then it stores the tar file back
in the archive.  Subsequent attempts to <code>get</code>
 the same revision (or
any later revision) will use the cached tree.
</p><p>To remove a previously cached tree, use:
</p><pre>
        % larch archive-uncache-revision [ARCHIVE/]REVISION

</pre>
<p>For each user, <code>arch</code>
 also maintains a &quot;client side&quot; cache of
revisions that can speed up <code>get</code>
 (and other operations).  The details
of client side caching are documented in a later chapter (xref!!!).
</p>










<hr>

<a name="Finding_Out_What_Changed"></a>



<h3 align=center>Finding Out What Changed</h3>




<small>
<b>up: </b><a href="basic-rc.html#Basic_Revision_Control">Basic Revision Control</a></br>
<b>next: </b><a href="basic-rc.html#The_whats-missing_Command">The whats-missing Command</a></br>

<b>prev: </b><a href="basic-rc.html#Optimizing_Archives_for_get">Optimizing Archives for get</a></br>

</small>
<br>






<p><a name="index-pt:11"></a>

</p><p>Before performing a <code>commit</code>
, you might want to check to see what 
has actually changed -- that is, find out exactly what patch set your
<code>commit</code>
 will create.
</p><p>You can do that with the command <code>what-changed</code>
:
</p><pre>
        % larch what-changed
        [...patch set report...]

</pre>
<p><code>what-changed</code>
 computes a patch set between your modified project tree
and the latest patch level for which your project tree is up-to-date.
In other words, it tells you what changes have been made to your tree
compared to the tree in the archive.
</p><p><code>what-changed</code>
 leaves behind a directory containing the patch set and
patch report, which you can usefully browse by hand.
</p><pre>
    % ls
    ,,what-changed.arch--devo--0.5--patch-14--lord@regexps.com--arch-1
    [...]

</pre>
<p>The default output of <code>what-changed</code>
 is formatted for use with the
<code>outline</code>
 mode of <strong>GNU Emacs</strong>.
</p><p>You can ask <code>what-changed</code>
 to also generate an HTML-formatted report
with:
</p><pre>
        % larch what-changed --url
        URL of patch report

</pre>
<p>The HTML report has links to each context diff, added, and removed
file.  The output of the command is a <code>file:</code>
 method URL.  For
example, a useful command for <code>netscape</code>
 users is:
</p><pre>
        % netscape --remote &quot;openURL(`larch what-changed --url`)&quot;

</pre>











<hr>

<a name="The_whats-missing_Command"></a>



<h3 align=center>The whats-missing Command</h3>




<small>
<b>up: </b><a href="basic-rc.html#Basic_Revision_Control">Basic Revision Control</a></br>
<b>next: </b><a href="basic-rc.html#Update">Update</a></br>

<b>prev: </b><a href="basic-rc.html#Finding_Out_What_Changed">Finding Out What Changed</a></br>

</small>
<br>






<p><a name="index-pt:12"></a>

</p><p>Suppose that more than one programmer is checking revisions into a
version, Alice and Bob for example.
</p><p>Alice and Bob both start with working directories and both make some
changes.  Alice commits several changes.  Now Bob's working directory
has fallen behind archived development path.
</p><p>The command <code>whats-missing</code>
 can be used to tell Bob which patches he
is missing:
</p><pre>
        % larch whats-missing --summary
        patch-N
                summary of patch N
        patch-N+1
                summary of patch N+1 
        ...

</pre>
<p>For each patch that Bob is missing, <code>whats-missing --summary</code>
 prints
the name of the patch and the contents of the <code>Summary:</code>
 header from
its log message.
</p><p>The <code>whats-missing</code>
 command is explained in greater detail in a later
chapter (see <a href="patch-logs.html#Patch_Logs_and_ChangeLogs">Patch Logs and ChangeLogs</a>).
</p>










<hr>

<a name="Update"></a>



<h3 align=center>Update</h3>




<small>
<b>up: </b><a href="basic-rc.html#Basic_Revision_Control">Basic Revision Control</a></br>
<b>next: </b><a href="basic-rc.html#Replay">Replay</a></br>

<b>prev: </b><a href="basic-rc.html#The_whats-missing_Command">The whats-missing Command</a></br>

</small>
<br>






<p>So Bob is behind by a few patches, but also has his own modifications.
</p><p>Diagramatically, we have something like:
</p><pre>
        Patch Levels    Bob's Working
        in the          Directory
        Archive:
        ------------------------------

</pre>
<pre>
        base-0

</pre>
<pre>
        patch-1
        patch-2
        patch-3
        patch-4 --------> bob-0 (Bob's initial working directory)
        patch-5             |
        patch-6             |
        patch-7             V
        patch-8           bob-1 (Bob's working dir with changes)

</pre>
<p>Bob is missing patches five through eight.
</p><p>The command <code>update</code>
 can be used to fix the situation:
</p><pre>
        % larch update OLD-DIR NEW-DIR

</pre>
<p>as in:
</p><pre>
        % larch update bob-1 bob-2

</pre>
<p><code>update</code>
 works in several steps.  First, it gets a copy of the latest
revision (<code>patch-8</code>
 in this case).  It also gets a copy of the
revision from which <code>OLD-DIR</code>
 is dervied (<code>patch-4</code>
 in this case).
Then it uses <code>mkpatch</code>
 to compute the differences between <code>OLD-DIR</code>
 
and its source revision, and applies those differences (using
<code>dopatch</code>
) to the latest revision.
</p><p>In the example, update will create the directory <code>bob-2</code>
, with
the source:
</p><pre>
        delta(patch-4, bob-1)[patch-8]

</pre>
<p>(For information about this notation, see <a href="theory-of-patches.html#The_Theory_of_Patches_and_Revisions">The Theory of Patches and Revisions</a>.)
</p><p>Applying that patch might cause conflicts.  In that case, <code>update</code>

will print a message telling Bob to look for <code>.rej</code>
 files.
</p><p>As a convenience, <code>update</code>
 also copies all &quot;precious&quot; non-source
files from <code>OLD-DIR</code>
 to <code>NEW-DIR</code>
 (see <a href="inventory.html#arch_Project_Inventories">arch Project Inventories</a>).
</p><p>Of course, if Bob only wanted to &quot;partly update&quot;, he could do that
with an extra parameter to <code>update</code>
, as in the example:
</p><pre>
        # update, but only up to patch level 6:
        # 

</pre>
<pre>
        % larch update bob-1 bob-2 hello--devo--1.1--patch-6

</pre>
<p>Finally, <code>update</code>
 can replace <code>OLD-DIR</code>
 with the updated directory if
given the <code>--in-place</code>
 flag:
</p><pre>
        % larch update --in-place OLD-DIR

</pre>











<hr>

<a name="Replay"></a>



<h3 align=center>Replay</h3>




<small>
<b>up: </b><a href="basic-rc.html#Basic_Revision_Control">Basic Revision Control</a></br>
<b>next: </b><a href="basic-rc.html#The_Next_Version">The Next Version</a></br>

<b>prev: </b><a href="basic-rc.html#Update">Update</a></br>

</small>
<br>






<p><code>update</code>
 isn't the only way to catch-up with a development path.
Another option is <code>replay</code>
:
</p><pre>
        % larch replay old-dir new-dir

</pre>
<p>Using the same example:
</p><pre>
        Patch Levels    Bob's Working
        in the          Directory
        Archive:
        ------------------------------

</pre>
<pre>
        base-0

</pre>
<pre>
        patch-1
        patch-2
        patch-3
        patch-4 --------> bob-0 (Bob's initial working directory)
        patch-5             |
        patch-6             |
        patch-7             V
        patch-8           bob-1 (Bob's working dir with changes)

</pre>
<p>and the command:
</p><pre>
        % larch replay bob-1 bob-2

</pre>
<p><code>replay</code>
 will first copy <code>bob-1</code>
 to create <code>bob-2</code>
.  Then it will
apply each missing patch in succession until <code>bob-2</code>
 is up-to-date, or
until a merge conflict occurs.
</p><p>Thus, if no conflict occurs, <code>replay</code>
 computes:
</p><pre>
        patch-8 [ patch-7 [ patch-6 [ patch-5 [ bob-1 ]]]]

</pre>
<p>If a conflict occured in, say, <code>patch-6</code>
, then <code>replay</code>
 would compute:
</p><pre>
        patch-6 [ patch-5 [ bob-1 ]]

</pre>
<p>and after fixing the conflict, Bob could use a second <code>replay</code>
 command
to apply patches seven and eight.
</p><p>As with <code>update</code>
, <code>replay</code>
 also copies all &quot;precious&quot; non-source
files from <code>OLD-DIR</code>
 to <code>NEW-DIR</code>
 (see <a href="inventory.html#arch_Project_Inventories">arch Project Inventories</a>).
</p><p>Of course, if Bob only wanted to &quot;partly replay&quot;, he could do that
with an extra parameter to <code>replay</code>
, as in the example:
</p><pre>
        # replay, but only up to patch level 6:
        # 

</pre>
<pre>
        % larch replay bob-1 bob-2 hello--devo--1.1--patch-6

</pre>
<p>You can use <code>replay</code>
 to modify an existing directory rather than
creating a new directory:
</p><pre>
        % larch replay --in-place DIR [REVISION]

</pre>
<p>but be careful: if <code>DIR</code>
 contains precious local changes, and
conflicts occur, or if you simply decide the <code>replay</code>
 wasn't a good
idea, you'll have to do some work to revert the <code>replay</code>
.
</p>










<hr>

<a name="The_Next_Version"></a>



<h3 align=center>The Next Version</h3>




<small>
<b>up: </b><a href="basic-rc.html#Basic_Revision_Control">Basic Revision Control</a></br>

<b>prev: </b><a href="basic-rc.html#Replay">Replay</a></br>

</small>
<br>






<p>In simple situations, a version like <code>hello--devo--1.0</code>
 will be
followed by the <em>
<a name="index-pt:13"></a>

next version
</em>
: <code>hello--devo--1.1</code>
 or
<code>hello--devo--2.0</code>
, for example.
</p><p>Such a version is called a <em>
<a name="index-pt:14"></a>

continuation
</em>
 of the previous version and
it is created with this sequence of commands (in the root of a working
directory):
</p><pre>
        % larch make-version NEXT-VERSION
        % larch add-log NEXT-VERSION
        % larch set-tree-version NEXT-VERSION
        % larch make-log
        [...edit log message...]
        % larch commit --continuation PREVIOUS-VERSION

</pre>
<p>as in:
</p><pre>
        % larch make-version hello--devo--1.1
        % larch add-log hello--devo--1.1
        % larch set-tree-version hello--devo--1.1
        % larch make-log
        [...edit log message...]
        % larch commit --continuation hello--devo--1.0

</pre>
<p>Those commands create the <code>base-0</code>
 revision of the new version but
instead of storing complete source for the base revision, they store a
pointer to the older revision which the base revision is equal to.
</p><p>On the other hand, if you wanted the next version to start completely
from scratch (perhaps because a program is being replaced by an
entirely new implementation), the <code>import</code>
 command can create the next
version as documented earlier in this chapter.
</p><p>Finally, there is another command (besides <code>commit --continuation</code>
)
for creating the next version, <code>larch tag</code>
, described in the next
chapter.
</p>


















<small><i>arch: The arch Revision Control System

</i></small><br>


<a href="http://www.regexps.com">The Hackerlab at <code>regexps.com</code></a>

</body>