1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99
|
This directory contains exercises for building ASIS applications
based on general traversal of ASIS compilation units. These
applications are supposed to be built from the set of the ASIS
Application Templates provided by ASIS-for-GNAT.
We suggest you to build two ASIS tools - a simple style checker and a
simple metrics collection tool. Both of them are very typical examples
of ASIS applications. The corresponding tutorial materials are placed
into subdirectories 'style_checker' and 'metrics' accordingly.
Each of this subdirectories has the following structure:
- readme file - contains the formulation of the problem to solve. The
problems is subdivided into two tasks: first -
developing a very simple version of the tool; second
- enhancing the tool by adding addition
functionality.
- task_1 - our solution for the first task and some hints for
the second task;
- task_2 - our solution for the second task;
The subdirectory 'test_units' contains a set of Ada components you may
use to test the ASIS tools.
It may be the case for an ASIS newcomer, that the first task (that
is, the development of a simple ASIS tool from the set of the ASIS
application templates) is more complicated, then the second one
(adding some new functionality to the existing ASIS tool). If so, you
may study the solution we provide for the first task as an ASIS
example and work on the second task only.
To start working on the tutorial applications, copy ASIS application
templates from the ASIS distribution (catalog
asis-[version3]-src/templates) into your working directory.
The main thing you will have to do to build both style checking and
metrics tools is replacing the empty bodies of actual Pre- and
Post-operations in the corresponding subunits with the real code
(actually, you only need to replace the template for Pre-operation,
and Post-operation may be empty for both these tools). For the style
checking tool you can reuse the rest of the code of the ASIS
application templates. For the metrics tool you will have to modify
the general unit processing routine (Unit_Processing.Process_Unit) -
you can output the results only when the whole Element structure of
the unit has been already processed.
You may also need to provide additional Ada components (for example -
in case of the metrics tool, you may want to provide the package
defining the data structures for collecting the metrics information
and for printing out the metrics values).
Let's assume, that the ASIS tools to be built should process all the
user-defined units in the Context, and that they do not have any
parameter.
Our solutions of the tutorial tasks are based on the simplest (and
the only for the moment) driver provided by the set of the ASIS
Application Templates - ASIS_Application_Driver_1. To test the
solution, you have to create the tree files for the Ada units to
process by the ASIS tool in your current directory.
And here is the general guideline for developing the actual
Pre-operation for instantiation Asis.Iterator.Traverse_Element.
Actual Pre-operation processes a single Element, and they do not know
in advance what is the kind of their argument Element. So, the first
thing to do is to define the position of the Element being processed
in the Element classification hierarchy, and then, depending on the
Element kind, to do this, that or nothing. As a result, the general
"template" for actual Pre-operation looks like this:
procedure Pre_Operation
(Element : Asis.Element;
Control : in out Asis.Traverse_Control;
State : in out Traversal_State)
is
Arg_Kind : Asis.Element_Kinds;
...
begin
Arg_Kind := Asis.Elements.Element_Kind (Element);
case Arg_Kind is
when A_Pragma =>
Process_Pragma;
when A_Declaration =>
Process_Declaration;
...
when others =>
null;
end case;
...
end Pre_Operation;
Very often you have to use nested case statements to define the exact
position of the argument Element in the Element classification
hierarchy and to provide the specific processing for specific
subordinate kinds.
|