1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238
|
---
layout: documentation
title: BUILD style guide
---
# BUILD style guide
In `BUILD` files, we take the same approach as in Go: We let the machine take care
of most formatting issues.
[Buildifier](https://github.com/bazelbuild/buildifier) is a tool that parses and
emits the source code in a standard style. Every `BUILD` file is therefore
formatted in the same automated way, which makes formatting a non-issue during
code reviews. It also makes it easier for tools to understand, edit, and
generate `BUILD` files.
`BUILD` file formatting must match the output of `buildifier`.
## Formatting example
```python
# Test code implementing the Foo controller.
package(default_testonly = True)
py_test(
name = "foo_test",
srcs = glob(["*.py"]),
data = [
"//data/production/foo:startfoo",
"//foo",
"//third_party/java/jdk:jdk-k8",
],
flaky = True,
deps = [
":check_bar_lib",
":foo_data_check",
":pick_foo_port",
"//pyglib",
"//testing/pybase",
],
)
```
## File structure
We recommend to use the following order (every element is optional):
* Package description (a comment)
* All `load()` statements
* The `package()` function.
* Calls to rules and macros
Buildifier makes a distinction between a standalone comment and a comment
attached to an element. If a comment is not attached to a specific element, use
an empty line after it. The distinction is important when doing automated
changes (e.g. to decide if we keep or remove a comment when we delete a rule).
```python
# Standalone comment (e.g. to make a section in a file)
# Comment for the cc_library below
cc_library(name = "cc")
```
## References to targets in the current package
Files should be referred to by their paths relative to the package directory
(without ever using up-references, such as `..`). Generated files should be
prefixed with "`:`" to indicate that they are not sources. Source files
should not be prefixed with `:`. Rules should be prefixed with `:`. For
example, assuming `x.cc` is a source file:
```python
cc_library(
name = "lib",
srcs = ["x.cc"],
hdrs = [":gen_header"],
)
genrule(
name = "gen_header",
srcs = [],
outs = ["x.h"],
cmd = "echo 'int x();' > $@",
)
```
## Target naming
Target names should be descriptive. If a target contains one source file,
the target should generally have a name derived from that source (e.g., a
`cc_library` for `chat.cc` could be named "`chat`", or a `java_library` for
`DirectMessage.java` could be named "`direct_message`").
The eponymous target for a package (the target with the same name as the
containing directory) should provide the functionality described by the
directory name. If there is no such target, do not create an eponymous
target.
Prefer using the short name when referring to an eponymous target (`//x`
instead of `//x:x`). If you are in the same package, prefer the local
reference (`:x` instead of `//x`).
Avoid using "reserved" target names which have special meaning. This includes
"`all`", "`__pkg__`", and "`__subpackages__`", these names have special
semantics and can cause confusion and unexpected behaviors when they are used.
In the absence of a prevailing team convention these are some non-binding
recommendations that are broadly used at Google:
* In general, use ["snake_case"](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Snake_case)
* For a java_library with one src this would mean using a name that is not
the same as the filename without the extension
* For Java \*\_binary and \*\_test rules use
["Upper CamelCase"](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Camel_case). This
allows for the target name to match one of the srcs. For
java\_test, this makes it possible for the test\_class attribute to be
inferred from the name of the target.
* If there are multiple variants of a particular target then add a suffix to
disambiguate (i.e. :foo_dev, :foo_prod or :bar_x86, :bar_x64)
* \_test targets should be suffixed with "\_test", "\_unittest", "Test", or
"Tests"
* Avoid meaningless suffixes like "\_lib" or "\_library" (unless necessary to
avoid conflicts between a \_library target and its corresponding \_binary)
* For proto related targets:
* proto_library targets should have names ending in "\_proto"
* Languages specific \*\_proto_library rules should match the underlying
proto but replace "\_proto" with a language specific suffix such as:
* cc_proto_library: "\_cc\_proto"
* java_proto_library: "\_java\_proto"
* java_lite_proto_library: "\_java_proto_lite"
## Visibility
Visibility should be scoped as tightly as possible, while still allowing access
by tests and reverse dependencies. Use `__pkg__` and `__subpackages__` as
appropriate.
Avoid setting package `default_visibility` to `//visibility:public`.
`//visibility:public` should be individually set only for targets in the
project's public API. These could be libraries that are designed to be depended
on by external projects or binaries that could be used by an external project's
build process.
## Dependencies
Dependencies should be restricted to direct dependencies (dependencies
needed by the sources listed in the rule). Do not list transitive
dependencies.
Package-local dependencies should be listed first and referred to in a way
compatible with the
[References to targets in the current package](#references-to-targets-in-the-current-package)
section above (not by their absolute package name).
Prefer to list dependencies directly, as a single list. Putting the "common"
dependencies of several targets into a variable reduces maintainability, makes
it impossible for tools to change the dependencies of a target and can lead to
unused dependencies.
## Globs
Indicate "no targets" with `[]`. Do not use a glob that matches nothing: it
is more error-prone and less obvious than an empty list.
### Recursive
Do not use recursive globs to match source files (for example,
`glob(["**/*.java"])`).
Recursive globs make BUILD files difficult to reason about because they skip
subdirectories containing BUILD files.
Recursive globs are generally less efficient than having a BUILD file per
directory with a dependency graph defined between them as this enables better
remote caching and parallelism.
We recommend authoring a BUILD file per directory and defining a dependency
graph between them instead.
### Non-recursive
Non-recursive globs are generally acceptable.
## Other conventions
* Use uppercase and underscores to declare constants (e.g. `GLOBAL_CONSTANT`),
use lowercase and underscores to declare variables (e.g. `my_variable`).
* Labels should never be split, even if they are longer than 79 characters.
Labels should be string literals whenever possible. Rationale: It makes
find and replace easy. It also improves readability.
* The value of the name attribute should be a literal constant string (except
in macros). *Rationale*: External tools use the name attribute to refer a
rule. They need to find rules without having to interpret code.
* When setting boolean-type attributes, use boolean values, not integer values.
For legacy reasons, rules will still convert integers to booleans as needed,
but this is discouraged. *Rationale*: `flaky = 1` could be misread as saying
"deflake this target by rerunning it once". `flaky = True` unambiguously says
"this test is flaky".
## Differences with Python style guide
Although compatibility with
[Python style guide](https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0008/) is a goal, there
are a few differences:
* No strict line length limit. Long comments and long strings are often split
to 79 columns, but it is not required. It should not be enforced in code
reviews or presubmit scripts. *Rationale*: Labels can be long and exceed this
limit. It is common for `BUILD` files to be generated or edited by tools, which
does not go well with a line length limit.
* Implicit string concatenation is not supported. Use the `+` operator.
*Rationale*: `BUILD` files contain many string lists. It is easy to forget a
comma, which leads to a complete different result. This has created many bugs
in the past. [See also this discussion.](https://lwn.net/Articles/551438/)
* Use spaces around the `=` sign for keywords arguments in rules. *Rationale*:
Named arguments are much more frequent than in Python and are always on a
separate line. Spaces improve readability. This convention has been around
for a long time, and we don't think it is worth modifying all existing
`BUILD` files.
* By default, use double quotation marks for strings. *Rationale*: This is not
specified in the Python style guide, but it recommends consistency. So we
decided to use only double-quoted strings. Many languages use double-quotes
for string literals.
* Use a single blank line between two top-level definitions. *Rationale*: The
structure of a `BUILD` file is not like a typical Python file. It has only
top-level statements. Using a single-blank line makes `BUILD` files shorter.
|