1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347
|
/*****************************************************************
* @LICENSE@
*****************************************************************/
/* compstruct_main.c
* SRE, Tue Aug 30 10:35:31 1994
*
* Compare RNA secondary structures.
*
*****************************************************************
* Note on obtaining sd/variance on individual measurements:
* The output is structured so it can be easily postprocessed to obtain
* more detailed summary statistics. Output for an individual structure
* looks like:
*
* DA0261: == 100.00 100.00
* 21/21 trusted pairs correctly predicted (100.00% sensitivity)
* 21/21 predicted pairs are true (100.00% PPV/specificity)
*
* If any error occurs parsing a structure, it won't be included
* in the totals, and its output would look like:
*
* seq2: [REJECTED: no test or trusted structure]
*
* The string "==", therefore, is a unique tag for individual
* sequence results. The first number is the sensitivity; the second
* is the PPV (specificity) for this structure.
*
* So, to get variance/sd info, pipe through grep and the avg script:
*
* Sensitivity statistics:
* compstruct trna1415.sto trna1415.sto | grep "==" | avg -f2
* PPV statistics
* compstruct trna1415.sto trna1415.sto | grep "==" | avg -f3
*
* SRE, Wed Feb 4 08:42:58 2004
*
*****************************************************************
* CVS $Id: compstruct_main.c,v 1.11 2004/03/30 21:40:01 eddy Exp $
*/
#include "squidconf.h"
#include <stdio.h>
#include <string.h>
#include <ctype.h>
#include "squid.h"
#include "msa.h"
#include "sre_stack.h"
static char banner[] = "compstruct - calculate accuracy of RNA secondary structure predictions";
char usage[] = "\
Usage: compstruct [-options] <trusted file> <test file>\n\
Both files must contain secondary structure markup (e.g. Stockholm, SQUID,\n\
SELEX formats), and sequences must occur in the same order in the two files.\n\
The markup must be in WUSS notation.\n\
\n\
Available options are:\n\
-h : print short help and usage info\n\
-m : use Mathews' more relaxed criterion for correctness; allow +/-1 slip\n\
-p : count pseudoknotted base pairs (default: ignore them)\n\
";
static char experts[] = "\
--informat <s> : specify that both alignments are in format <s> (SELEX, for instance)\n\
--quiet : suppress verbose header (used in regression testing)\n\
";
struct opt_s OPTIONS[] = {
{ "-h", TRUE, sqdARG_NONE },
{ "-m", TRUE, sqdARG_NONE },
{ "-p", TRUE, sqdARG_NONE },
{ "--informat", FALSE, sqdARG_STRING },
{ "--quiet", FALSE, sqdARG_NONE },
};
#define NOPTIONS (sizeof(OPTIONS) / sizeof(struct opt_s))
int
main(int argc, char **argv)
{
char *kfile, *tfile; /* known, test structure file */
int format; /* expected format of kfile, tfile */
SQFILE *kfp, *tfp; /* open kfile, tfile */
char *kseq, *tseq; /* known, test sequence */
SQINFO kinfo, tinfo; /* known, test info */
int *kct, *tct; /* known, test CT rep of structure */
int pos;
int nseq; /* total number of sequences in the files */
int nseq_rejected; /* total number of sequences rejected */
int kpairs; /* count of base pairs in a known (trusted) structure */
int tpairs; /* count of base pairs in a test (predicted) structure */
int kcorrect; /* # bp in a known structure that are correctly predicted */
int tcorrect; /* # bp in a test structure that are true */
int tot_kpairs; /* total base pairs in all known structures */
int tot_tpairs; /* total base pairs in all predicted structures */
int tot_kcorrect; /* total correctly predicted pairs in all known structures*/
int tot_tcorrect; /* total true pairs in all test structures */
int tot_positions; /* total # of bases */
int be_quiet; /* TRUE to silence verbose banner */
int do_mathews; /* TRUE to use Mathews' relaxed +/-1 criterion for "correct" */
int count_pseudoknots; /* TRUE to count pseudoknotted base pairs */
char *optname;
char *optarg;
int optind;
/***********************************************
* Parse command line
***********************************************/
format = MSAFILE_UNKNOWN;
be_quiet = FALSE;
do_mathews = FALSE;
count_pseudoknots = FALSE;
while (Getopt(argc, argv, OPTIONS, NOPTIONS, usage,
&optind, &optname, &optarg))
{
if (strcmp(optname, "-m") == 0) do_mathews = TRUE;
else if (strcmp(optname, "-p") == 0) count_pseudoknots = TRUE;
else if (strcmp(optname, "--quiet") == 0) be_quiet = TRUE;
else if (strcmp(optname, "--informat") == 0) {
format = String2SeqfileFormat(optarg);
if (format == MSAFILE_UNKNOWN)
Die("unrecognized sequence file format \"%s\"", optarg);
if (! IsAlignmentFormat(format))
Die("%s is an unaligned format, can't read as an alignment", optarg);
}
else if (strcmp(optname, "-h") == 0) {
SqdBanner(stdout, banner);
puts(usage);
puts(experts);
exit(EXIT_SUCCESS);
}
}
if (argc - optind != 2)
Die("Incorrect number of command line arguments.\n%s\n", usage);
kfile = argv[optind++];
tfile = argv[optind];
if (! be_quiet) SqdBanner(stdout, banner);
/***********************************************
* Open the files
***********************************************/
if ((kfp = SeqfileOpen(kfile, format, NULL)) == NULL)
Die("Failed to open trusted structure file %s for reading", kfile);
if ((tfp = SeqfileOpen(tfile, format, NULL)) == NULL)
Die("Failed to open test structure file %s for reading", tfile);
/***********************************************
* Do structure comparisons, one seq at a time
***********************************************/
tot_kpairs = tot_kcorrect = 0;
tot_tpairs = tot_tcorrect = 0;
nseq = nseq_rejected = 0;
tot_positions = 0;
while (ReadSeq(kfp, kfp->format, &kseq, &kinfo) && ReadSeq(tfp, tfp->format, &tseq, &tinfo))
{
nseq++;
printf("%s: ", kinfo.name); /* no \n is deliberate. rest of line is either error msg, or %/% result */
/* We might reject a structure comparison for a variety of
* QC reasons. We print "REJECTED" as a greppable tag, with an explanation;
* we bump the rejected counter.
*
* beware: those last two tests are not just tests; they're also running
* WUSS2ct() to create the kct,tct structures that we need. So don't muck
* around with those tests without preserving the function calls.
*/
if (strcmp(tinfo.name, kinfo.name) != 0) {
printf("[REJECTED: Trusted sequence %s, test sequence %s -- names not identical]\n\n",
kinfo.name, tinfo.name);
nseq_rejected++;
} else if (strcmp(kseq, tseq) != 0) {
printf("[REJECTED: Trusted sequence %s, test sequence %s -- sequences not identical]\n\n",
kinfo.name, tinfo.name);
nseq_rejected++;
} else if (! (tinfo.flags & SQINFO_SS) && ! (kinfo.flags & SQINFO_SS)) {
printf("[REJECTED: no test or trusted structure]\n\n");
nseq_rejected++;
} else if (! (tinfo.flags & SQINFO_SS)) {
printf("[REJECTED: no test structure]\n\n");
nseq_rejected++;
} else if (! (kinfo.flags & SQINFO_SS)) {
printf("[REJECTED: no trusted structure]\n\n");
nseq_rejected++;
} else if (! WUSS2ct(kinfo.ss, kinfo.len, count_pseudoknots, &kct)) {
printf("[REJECTED: bad trusted structure]\n");
nseq_rejected++;
} else if (! WUSS2ct(tinfo.ss, kinfo.len, count_pseudoknots, &tct)) {
printf("[bad test structure]\n");
free(kct); /* because the WUSS2ct() call above us must've succeeded */
nseq_rejected++;
} else {
/* OK, we're all set up, and we're about to count up our correctly predicted
* pairs. A brief digression/commentary first. We have to
* define what you mean by a "correctly predicted" base
* pair.
*
* Our default criterion is simple and strict: the known base pair
* must be exactly present in the prediction; kct[pos] == tct[pos]
* where kct[pos] > 0.
*
* Dave Mathews [MathewsTurner99] uses a more relaxed
* criterion that allows a little helix slippage in the prediction.
* For a known pair (i,j), he considers the prediction to be correct if
* the prediction contains a base pair (i,j), (i+1,j), (i-1,j), (i,j+1),
* or (i,j-1).
*
* A problem that arises here is that the mapping of known
* to predicted base pairs is not one-to-one under Mathews'
* rule: a single predicted pair can cause two known pairs
* to be considered to be "correctly predicted". You'd sort
* of like to run some sort of maximum matching algorithm to
* assign a one-to-one correspondence between known and
* predicted pairs. It does not appear that Mathews does this,
* though.
*
* And for us, the problem becomes a little worse. Mathews only
* tabulates "correct" base pairs (our "sensitivity"), and
* does not run a calculation of how many predicted pairs
* are true (our "specificity", or positive predictive
* value).
*
* So: when we implement the Mathews rule, we do it the most
* simple and obvious way. We apply his correctness rule in
* both directions. A known pair i,j is considered to be correctly predicted
* if the prediction contains any one of the pairs (i,j), (i+1,j), (i-1,j), (i,j+1),
* or (i,j-1), for the purposes of sensitivity. Conversely,
* a predicted pair i,j is considered to be correct if the
* known structure contains any one of the pairs (i,j), (i+1,j), (i-1,j), (i,j+1),
* or (i,j-1), for the purposes of PPV. That is, we do not
* worry at all about establishing an optimal one-to-one mapping between
* known and predicted pairs. We think that this is likely
* to reflect Mathews' own implementation, but have not verified this.
*/
tpairs = tcorrect = 0; /* predicted "test" structure */
kpairs = kcorrect = 0; /* trusted "known" structure */
for (pos = 1; pos <= kinfo.len; pos++)
{
/* sensitivity; looking from the known (trusted) structure's base pairs.
*/
if (kct[pos] > pos) /* there is a known base pair between (pos, kct[pos]) */
{
kpairs++; /* don't doublecount */
if (do_mathews) {
if (tct[pos] == kct[pos] || /* i,j */
(pos > 1 && tct[pos-1] == kct[pos]) || /* i-1, j */
(pos < kinfo.len && tct[pos+1] == kct[pos]) || /* i+1, j */
(tct[pos] > 0 && tct[pos] == kct[pos]-1) || /* i, j-1 */
(tct[pos] > 0 && tct[pos] == kct[pos]+1)) /* i, j+1 */
kcorrect++;
} else {
if (tct[pos] == kct[pos]) kcorrect++;
}
}
/* specificity; looking from the test (predicted) structure's base pairs.
*/
if (tct[pos] > pos) /* we have a predicted base pair (pos, tct[pos]) */
{
tpairs++;
if (do_mathews) {
if (kct[pos] == tct[pos] || /* i,j */
(pos > 1 && kct[pos-1] == tct[pos]) || /* i-1, j */
(pos < tinfo.len && kct[pos+1] == tct[pos]) || /* i+1, j */
(kct[pos] > 0 && kct[pos] == tct[pos]-1) || /* i, j-1 */
(kct[pos] > 0 && kct[pos] == tct[pos]+1)) /* i, j+1 */
tcorrect++;
} else {
if (kct[pos] == tct[pos]) tcorrect++;
}
}
}
/* side note: under the default rule, tcorrect==kcorrect, because there's
* a one-to-one mapping of known to predicted pairs; but this is not
* necessarily the case for the relaxed Mathews rule.
*/
tot_tpairs += tpairs;
tot_tcorrect += tcorrect;
tot_kpairs += kpairs;
tot_kcorrect += kcorrect;
tot_positions += kinfo.len;
/* print out per sequence info */
printf(" == %.2f %.2f\n",
100. * (float) kcorrect/ (float) kpairs,
100. * (float) tcorrect/ (float) tpairs);
printf(" %d/%d trusted pairs correctly predicted (%.2f%% sensitivity)\n",
kcorrect, kpairs,
100. * (float) kcorrect/ (float) kpairs);
printf(" %d/%d predicted pairs are true (%.2f%% PPV/specificity)\n",
tcorrect, tpairs,
100. * (float) tcorrect/ (float) tpairs);
puts("");
free(kct);
free(tct);
}
FreeSequence(kseq, &kinfo);
FreeSequence(tseq, &tinfo);
}
/* And the final summary:
*/
puts("");
if (nseq_rejected > 0) {
printf("%d total sequences; %d counted towards comparison; %d rejected\n",
nseq, nseq-nseq_rejected, nseq_rejected);
printf(" (grep for \"REJECTED\" in the above output to identify the problems)\n\n");
}
printf("Overall structure prediction accuracy (%d sequences, %d positions)\n",
nseq - nseq_rejected, tot_positions);
printf(" %d/%d trusted pairs predicted (%.2f%% sensitivity)\n",
tot_kcorrect, tot_kpairs,
100. * (float) tot_kcorrect/ (float) tot_kpairs);
printf(" %d/%d predicted pairs correct (%.2f%% PPV, specificity)\n",
tot_tcorrect, tot_tpairs,
100. * (float) tot_tcorrect/ (float) tot_tpairs);
puts("");
SeqfileClose(tfp);
SeqfileClose(kfp);
return 0;
}
|