1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
|
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN"
"http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40/loose.dtd">
<HTML>
<HEAD><TITLE>enable_if</TITLE>
<META http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1">
<META name="GENERATOR" content="Microsoft FrontPage 5.0">
</HEAD>
<BODY >
<!--HEVEA command line is: hevea -nosymb -noiso -pedantic -v enable_if_docs_for_boost.tex -->
<!--HTMLHEAD-->
<!--ENDHTML-->
<!--PREFIX <ARG ></ARG>-->
<!--CUT DEF section 1 -->
<BR>
<BR>
<h1>
<img border="0" src="../../boost.png" align="center" width="277" height="86">enable_if</h1>
<BR>
<BR>
Copyright 2003 Jaakko Järvi, Jeremiah Willcock, Andrew Lumsdaine.<BR>
<BR>
<!--TOC section Introduction-->
<H2><A NAME="htoc1">1</A> Introduction</H2><!--SEC END -->
<A NAME="introduction"></A>
The <TT>enable_if</TT> family of templates is a set of tools to allow a function template or a class template specialization
to include or exclude itself from a set of matching functions or specializations
based on properties of its template arguments.
For example, one can define function templates that
are only enabled for, and thus only match, an arbitrary set of types
defined by a traits class. The <TT>enable_if</TT> templates can also be
applied to enable class template specializations. Applications of
<TT>enable_if</TT> are discussed in length
in [<A HREF="#jarvi:03:cuj_arbitrary_overloading"><CITE>1</CITE></A>] and [<A HREF="#jarvi:03:c++typeclasses"><CITE>2</CITE></A>].<BR>
<BR>
<!--TOC subsection Synopsis-->
<H3><A NAME="htoc2">1.1</A> Synopsis</H3><!--SEC END -->
<A NAME="sec:synopsis"></A>
<PRE>namespace boost {
template <class Cond, class T = void> struct enable_if;
template <class Cond, class T = void> struct disable_if;
template <class Cond, class T> struct lazy_enable_if;
template <class Cond, class T> struct lazy_disable_if;
template <bool B, class T = void> struct enable_if_c;
template <bool B, class T = void> struct disable_if_c;
template <bool B, class T> struct lazy_enable_if_c;
template <bool B, class T> struct lazy_disable_if_c;
}
</PRE>
<!--TOC subsection Background-->
<H3><A NAME="htoc3">1.2</A> Background</H3><!--SEC END -->
<A NAME="sec:background"></A>
Sensible operation of template function overloading in C++ relies
on the <EM>SFINAE</EM> (substitution-failure-is-not-an-error)
principle [<A HREF="#vandevoorde2002:templates"><CITE>3</CITE></A>]: if an invalid argument
or return type is formed during the instantiation of a function
template, the instantiation is removed from the overload resolution
set instead of causing a compilation error. The following example,
taken from [<A HREF="#jarvi:03:cuj_arbitrary_overloading"><CITE>1</CITE></A>],
demonstrates why this is important:
<PRE>int negate(int i) { return -i; }
template <class F>
typename F::result_type negate(const F& f) { return -f(); }
</PRE>
Suppose the compiler encounters the call <TT>negate(1)</TT>. The first
definition is obviously a better match, but the compiler must
nevertheless consider (and instantiate the prototypes) of both
definitions to find this out. Instantiating the latter definition with
<TT>F</TT> as <TT>int</TT> would result in:
<PRE>int::result_type negate(const int&);
</PRE>
where the return type is invalid. If this was an error, adding an unrelated function template
(that was never called) could break otherwise valid code.
Due to the SFINAE principle the above example is not, however, erroneous.
The latter definition of <TT>negate</TT> is simply removed from the overload resolution set.<BR>
<BR>
The <TT>enable_if</TT> templates are tools for controlled creation of the SFINAE
conditions.<BR>
<BR>
<!--TOC section The <TT>enable_if</TT> templates-->
<H2><A NAME="htoc4">2</A> The <TT>enable_if</TT> templates</H2><!--SEC END -->
<A NAME="enable_if"></A>
The names of the <TT>enable_if</TT> templates have three parts: an optional <TT>lazy_</TT> tag,
either <TT>enable_if</TT> or <TT>disable_if</TT>, and an optional <TT>_c</TT> tag.
All eight combinations of these parts are supported.
The meaning of the <TT>lazy_</TT> tag is described in Section <A HREF="#sec:enable_if_lazy">3.3</A>.
The second part of the name indicates whether a true condition argument should
enable or disable the current overload.
The third part of the name indicates whether the condition argument is a <TT>bool</TT> value
(<TT>_c</TT> suffix), or a type containing a static <TT>bool</TT> constant named <TT>value</TT> (no suffix).
The latter version interoperates with Boost.MPL. <BR>
<BR>
The definitions of <TT>enable_if_c</TT> and <TT>enable_if</TT> are as follows (we use <TT>enable_if</TT> templates
unqualified but they are in the <TT>boost</TT> namespace).
<PRE>template <bool B, class T = void>
struct enable_if_c {
typedef T type;
};
template <class T>
struct enable_if_c<false, T> {};
template <class Cond, class T = void>
struct enable_if : public enable_if_c<Cond::value, T> {};
</PRE>
An instantiation of the <TT>enable_if_c</TT> template with the parameter
<TT>B</TT> as <TT>true</TT> contains a member type <TT>type</TT>, defined
to be <TT>T</TT>. If <TT>B</TT> is
<TT>false</TT>, no such member is defined. Thus
<TT>enable_if_c<B, T>::type</TT> is either a valid or an invalid type
expression, depending on the value of <TT>B</TT>.
When valid, <TT>enable_if_c<B, T>::type</TT> equals <TT>T</TT>.
The <TT>enable_if_c</TT> template can thus be used for controlling when functions are considered for
overload resolution and when they are not.
For example, the following function is defined for all arithmetic types (according to the
classification of the <A HREF="../type_traits/index.html">Boost type_traits library</A>):
<PRE>template <class T>
typename enable_if_c<boost::is_arithmetic<T>::value, T>::type
foo(T t) { return t; }
</PRE>
The <TT>disable_if_c</TT> template is provided as well, and has the
same functionality as <TT>enable_if_c</TT> except for the negated condition. The following
function is enabled for all non-arithmetic types.
<PRE>template <class T>
typename disable_if_c<boost::is_arithmetic<T>::value, T>::type
bar(T t) { return t; }
</PRE>
For easier syntax in some cases and interoperation with Boost.MPL we provide versions of
the <TT>enable_if</TT> templates taking any type with a <TT>bool</TT> member constant named
<TT>value</TT> as the condition argument.
The MPL <TT>bool_</TT>, <TT>and_</TT>, <TT>or_</TT>, and <TT>not_</TT> templates are likely to be
useful for creating such types. Also, the traits classes in the Boost.Type_traits library
follow this convention.
For example, the above example function <TT>foo</TT> can be alternatively written as:
<PRE>template <class T>
typename enable_if<boost::is_arithmetic<T>, T>::type
foo(T t) { return t; }
</PRE>
<!--TOC section Using <TT>enable_if</TT>-->
<H2><A NAME="htoc5">3</A> Using <TT>enable_if</TT></H2><!--SEC END -->
<A NAME="sec:using_enable_if"></A>
The <TT>enable_if</TT> templates are defined in
<TT>boost/utility/enable_if.hpp</TT>, which is included by <TT>boost/utility.hpp</TT>.<BR>
<BR>
The <TT>enable_if</TT> template can be used either as the return type, or as an
extra argument. For example, the <TT>foo</TT> function in the previous section could also be written
as:
<PRE>template <class T>
T foo(T t, typename enable_if<boost::is_arithmetic<T> >::type* dummy = 0);
</PRE>Hence, an extra parameter of type <TT>void*</TT> is added, but it is given
a default value to keep the parameter hidden from client code.
Note that the second template argument was not given to <TT>enable_if</TT>, as the default
<TT>void</TT> gives the desired behavior.<BR>
<BR>
Whether to write the enabler as an argument or within the return type is
largely a matter of taste, but for certain functions, only one
alternative is possible:
<UL><LI>
Operators have a fixed number of arguments, thus <TT>enable_if</TT> must be used in the return type.
<LI>Constructors and destructors do not have a return type; an extra argument is the only option.
<LI>There does not seem to be a way to specify an enabler for a conversion operator. Converting constructors,
however, can have enablers as extra default arguments.
</UL>
<!--TOC subsection Enabling template class specializations-->
<H3><A NAME="htoc6">3.1</A> Enabling template class specializations</H3><!--SEC END -->
<A NAME="sec:enable_if_classes"></A>
Class template specializations can be enabled or disabled with <TT>enable_if</TT>.
One extra template parameter needs to be added for the enabler expressions.
This parameter has the default value <TT>void</TT>.
For example:
<PRE>template <class T, class Enable = void>
class A { ... };
template <class T>
class A<T, typename enable_if<is_integral<T> >::type> { ... };
template <class T>
class A<T, typename enable_if<is_float<T> >::type> { ... };
</PRE>Instantiating <TT>A</TT> with any integral type matches the first specialization,
whereas any floating point type matches the second one. All other types
match the primary template.
The condition can be any compile-time boolean expression that depends on the
template arguments of the class.
Note that again, the second argument to <TT>enable_if</TT> is not needed; the default (<TT>void</TT>)
is the correct value.<BR>
<BR>
<!--TOC subsection Overlapping enabler conditions-->
<H3><A NAME="htoc7">3.2</A> Overlapping enabler conditions</H3><!--SEC END -->
<A NAME="sec:overlapping_conditions"></A>
Once the compiler has examined the enabling conditions and included the
function into the overload resolution set, normal C++ overload resolution
rules are used to select the best matching function.
In particular, there is no ordering between enabling conditions.
Function templates with enabling conditions that are not mutually exclusive can
lead to ambiguities. For example:
<PRE>template <class T>
typename enable_if<boost::is_integral<T>, void>::type
foo(T t) {}
template <class T>
typename enable_if<boost::is_arithmetic<T>, void>::type
foo(T t) {}
</PRE>
All integral types are also arithmetic. Therefore, say, for the call <TT>foo(1)</TT>,
both conditions are true and both functions are thus in the overload resolution set.
They are both equally good matches and thus ambiguous.
Of course, more than one enabling condition can be simultaneously true as long as
other arguments disambiguate the functions.<BR>
<BR>
The above discussion applies to using <TT>enable_if</TT> in class template
partial specializations as well.<BR>
<BR>
<!--TOC subsection Lazy <TT>enable_if</TT>-->
<H3><A NAME="htoc8">3.3</A> Lazy <TT>enable_if</TT></H3><!--SEC END -->
<A NAME="sec:enable_if_lazy"></A>
In some cases it is necessary to avoid instantiating part of a
function signature unless an enabling condition is true. For example:
<PRE>template <class T, class U> class mult_traits;
template <class T, class U>
typename enable_if<is_multipliable<T, U>, typename mult_traits<T, U>::type>::type
operator*(const T& t, const U& u) { ... }
</PRE>Assume the class template <TT>mult_traits</TT> is a traits class defining
the resulting type of a multiplication operator. The <TT>is_multipliable</TT> traits
class specifies for which types to enable the operator. Whenever
<TT>is_multipliable<A, B>::value</TT> is <TT>true</TT> for some types <TT>A</TT> and <TT>B</TT>,
then <TT>mult_traits<A, B>::type</TT> is defined.<BR>
<BR>
Now, trying to invoke (some other overload) of <TT>operator*</TT> with, say, operand types <TT>C</TT> and <TT>D</TT>
for which <TT>is_multipliable<C, D>::value</TT> is <TT>false</TT>
and <TT>mult_traits<C, D>::type</TT> is not defined is an error on some compilers.
The SFINAE principle is not applied because
the invalid type occurs as an argument to another template. The <TT>lazy_enable_if</TT>
and <TT>lazy_disable_if</TT> templates (and their <TT>_c</TT> versions) can be used in such
situations:
<PRE>template<class T, class U>
typename lazy_enable_if<is_multipliable<T, U>, mult_traits<T, U> >::type
operator*(const T& t, const U& u) { ... }
</PRE>The second argument of <TT>lazy_enable_if</TT> must be a class type
that defines a nested type named <TT>type</TT> whenever the first
parameter (the condition) is true.<BR>
<BR>
<!--TOC paragraph Note-->
<H5>Note</H5><!--SEC END -->
Referring to one member type or static constant in a traits class
causes all of the members (type and static constant) of that
specialization to be instantiated. Therefore, if your traits classes
can sometimes contain invalid types, you should use two distinct
templates for describing the conditions and the type mappings. In the
above example, <TT>is_multipliable<T, U>::value</TT> defines when
<TT>mult_traits<T, U>::type</TT> is valid.<BR>
<BR>
<!--TOC subsection Compiler workarounds-->
<H3><A NAME="htoc9">3.4</A> Compiler workarounds</H3><!--SEC END -->
<A NAME="sec:workarounds"></A>
Some compilers flag functions as ambiguous if the only distinguishing factor is a different
condition in an enabler (even though the functions could never be ambiguous). For example,
some compilers (e.g. GCC 3.2) diagnose the following two functions as ambiguous:
<PRE>template <class T>
typename enable_if<boost::is_arithmetic<T>, T>::type
foo(T t);
template <class T>
typename disable_if<boost::is_arithmetic<T>, T>::type
foo(T t);
</PRE>Two workarounds can be applied:
<UL><LI>
Use an extra dummy parameter which disambiguates the functions. Use a default value for
it to hide the parameter from the caller. For example:
<PRE>template <int> struct dummy { dummy(int) {} };
template <class T>
typename enable_if<boost::is_arithmetic<T>, T>::type
foo(T t, dummy<0> = 0);
template <class T>
typename disable_if<boost::is_arithmetic<T>, T>::type
foo(T t, dummy<1> = 0);
</PRE><BR>
<BR>
<LI>Define the functions in different namespaces and bring them into a common
namespace with <TT>using</TT> declarations:
<PRE>namespace A {
template <class T>
typename enable_if<boost::is_arithmetic<T>, T>::type
foo(T t);
}
namespace B {
template <class T>
typename disable_if<boost::is_arithmetic<T>, T>::type
foo(T t);
}
using A::foo;
using B::foo;
</PRE>
Note that the second workaround above cannot be used for member
templates. On the other hand, operators do not accept extra arguments,
which makes the first workaround unusable. As the net effect,
neither of the workarounds are of assistance for templated operators that
need to be defined as member functions (assignment and
subscript operators).
</UL>
<!--TOC section Acknowledgements-->
<H2><A NAME="htoc10">4</A> Acknowledgements</H2><!--SEC END -->
We are grateful to Howard Hinnant, Jason Shirk, Paul Mensonides, and Richard
Smith whose findings have influenced the library.<BR>
<BR>
<!--TOC section References-->
<H2>References</H2><!--SEC END -->
<DL COMPACT=compact><DT><A NAME="jarvi:03:cuj_arbitrary_overloading"><FONT COLOR=purple>[1]</FONT></A><DD>
Jaakko Järvi, Jeremiah Willcock, Howard Hinnant, and Andrew Lumsdaine.
Function overloading based on arbitrary properties of types.
<EM>C/C++ Users Journal</EM>, 21(6):25--32, June 2003.<BR>
<BR>
<DT><A NAME="jarvi:03:c++typeclasses"><FONT COLOR=purple>[2]</FONT></A><DD>
Jaakko Järvi, Jeremiah Willcock, and Andrew Lumsdaine.
Concept-controlled polymorphism.
In Frank Pfennig and Yannis Smaragdakis, editors, <EM>Generative
Programming and Component Engineering</EM>, volume 2830 of <EM>LNCS</EM>, pages
228--244. Springer Verlag, September 2003.<BR>
<BR>
<DT><A NAME="vandevoorde2002:templates"><FONT COLOR=purple>[3]</FONT></A><DD>
David Vandevoorde and Nicolai M. Josuttis.
<EM>C++ Templates: The Complete Guide</EM>.
Addison-Wesley, 2002.</DL>
<hr/>
<p>Copyright Jaakko Järvi, Jeremiah Willcock and Andrew Lumsdaine<BR>
<EM>{jajarvi|jewillco|lums}@osl.iu.edu</EM><BR>
Indiana University<BR>
Open Systems Lab<br/>
Use, modification and distribution are subject to the
Boost Software License, Version 1.0.
(See accompanying file LICENSE_1_0.txt
or copy at <a href="http://www.boost.org/LICENSE_1_0.txt">
http://www.boost.org/LICENSE_1_0.txt
</a>).
</p>
<!--HTMLFOOT-->
<!--ENDHTML-->
<!--FOOTER-->
<HR SIZE=2>
<BLOCKQUOTE><EM>This document was translated from L<sup>A</sup>T<sub>E</sub>X by
</EM><A HREF="http://pauillac.inria.fr/~maranget/hevea/index.html"><EM>H<FONT SIZE=2><sup>E</sup></FONT>V<FONT SIZE=2><sup>E</sup></FONT>A</EM></A><EM>.
</EM></BLOCKQUOTE>
</BODY>
</HTML>
|
