File: py_kernel.hh

package info (click to toggle)
cadabra2 2.4.3.2-2
  • links: PTS, VCS
  • area: main
  • in suites: sid
  • size: 78,732 kB
  • sloc: ansic: 133,450; cpp: 92,064; python: 1,530; javascript: 203; sh: 184; xml: 182; objc: 53; makefile: 51
file content (82 lines) | stat: -rw-r--r-- 3,451 bytes parent folder | download | duplicates (3)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
#pragma once

#include <pybind11/pybind11.h>

#include "../Kernel.hh"

namespace cadabra {

	/// \ingroup pythoncore
	///
	/// Setup of kernels in current scope, callable from Python.
	/// When the decision was made to graft Cadabra onto Python, a choice had
	/// to be made about how Python variable scope would influence the
	/// visibility of Cadabra properties. It clearly makes sense to be able to
	/// declare properties which only hold inside a particular
	/// function. However Cadabra expressions and properties do not directly
	/// correspond to Python objects. Rather, declaring a property is more
	/// like a function call into the Cadabra module, which leaves its imprint
	/// on the state of the C++ part but does not change anything on the
	/// Python side, as you typically do not assign the created property to a
	/// Python symbol. Therefore, properties do not naturally inherit Python's
	/// scoping rules (this is different from e.g.~SymPy, in which
	///   mathematical objects are always in one-to-one correspondence with a
	///   Python object). A more fundamental problem is that properties can be
	/// attached to patterns, and those patterns can involve more than just
	/// the symbols which one passes into a function.
	///
	/// In order to not burden the user, properties are therefore by default
	/// global variables, stored in a single global Cadabra object
	/// `__cdbkernel__` which is initialised at import of the Cadabra module.
	/// If you add new properties inside a function scope, these will go
	/// into this already existing *global* property list by default.
	/// If you want to create a local scope for your computations, create a
	/// new `__cdbkernel__` as in
	/// ```
	/// def fun():
	///    __cdbkernel__ = cadabra.create_scope();
	///    [your code here]
	/// ```
	/// Now computations will not see the global properties at all.
	/// If you want to import the global properties, use instead
	/// ```
	/// def fun():
	///    __cdbkernel__ = cadabra.create_scope_from_global()
	///    [your code here]
	/// ```
	/// It is crucial that the
	/// `__cdbkernel__` symbol is referenced from within Python and visible to the bytecompiler, because
	/// it is not possible to create new variables on the local stack at runtime.
	/// Internally, the second version above fetches, at runtime, the
	/// `__cdbkernel__` from the globals stack, copies all properties in there
	/// into a new kernel, and returns the latter.
	///
	/// Both versions above do populate the newly created kernel with
	/// Cadabra's default properties. If you want a completely clean slate
	/// (for e.g.~testing purposes, or because you really do not want default
	/// rules for sums and products), use
	/// ```
	/// def fun():
	///    __cdbkernel__ = cadabra.create_empty_scope()
	///    [your code here]
	/// ```
	/// Note that in all these cases, changes to properties remain local and
	/// do not leak into the global property list.
	///
	/// All Cadabra algorithms, when called from Python, will first look for a
	/// kernel on the locals stack (i.e.~what `locals()` produces). If
	/// there is no kernel available locally, they will then revert to using
	/// the global kernel.
	Kernel *create_scope();
	Kernel *create_scope_from_global();
	Kernel *create_empty_scope();

	/// \ingroup pythoncore
	///
	/// Get a pointer to the currently visible kernel.
	Kernel *get_kernel_from_scope();


	void init_kernel(pybind11::module& m);

	}