File: test.c

package info (click to toggle)
cbmc 6.6.0-4
  • links: PTS
  • area: main
  • in suites: forky, sid, trixie
  • size: 153,852 kB
  • sloc: cpp: 386,459; ansic: 114,466; java: 28,405; python: 6,003; yacc: 4,552; makefile: 4,041; lex: 2,487; xml: 2,388; sh: 2,050; perl: 557; pascal: 184; javascript: 163; ada: 36
file content (24 lines) | stat: -rw-r--r-- 798 bytes parent folder | download
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
#include <assert.h>
#include <stdlib.h>

// Similar to the previous tests in forall_6231_1 but this one aims to check
// the antecedent of the forall expression to make sure that checks are being
// generated correctly for it.

// clang-format off
int main() {
  char *a = malloc(10);
  int n;

  // BUG: In https://github.com/diffblue/cbmc/issues/6231, it was reported that
  // no checks would be performed on the derefence inside the quantified statement,
  // even when explicitly requested via for instance `--pointer-check`, because
  // we would simply skip over these quantified statements in goto-check.
  assert(
    __CPROVER_forall {
      int i ; (0 <= i && i < (n / 0))  /* (n / 0) should be caught by --div-by-zero-check */
      ==> *(a+i) == *(a+i)
    }
  );
}
// clang-format on