File: test.desc

package info (click to toggle)
cbmc 6.6.0-4
  • links: PTS
  • area: main
  • in suites: forky, sid, trixie
  • size: 153,852 kB
  • sloc: cpp: 386,459; ansic: 114,466; java: 28,405; python: 6,003; yacc: 4,552; makefile: 4,041; lex: 2,487; xml: 2,388; sh: 2,050; perl: 557; pascal: 184; javascript: 163; ada: 36
file content (19 lines) | stat: -rw-r--r-- 780 bytes parent folder | download 
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
 
CORE
main.c
--apply-loop-contracts
^EXIT=10$
^SIGNAL=0$
^\[main\.\d+\] .* Check loop invariant before entry: SUCCESS$
^\[main\.\d+\] .* Check that loop invariant is preserved: SUCCESS$
^\[main\.assertion\.\d+\] .* assertion __CPROVER_same_object\(old_data123, &\(data\[1\]\[2\]\[3\]\)\): SUCCESS$
^\[main\.assertion\.\d+\] .* assertion data\[1\]\[2\]\[3\] == 0: FAILURE$
^VERIFICATION FAILED$
--
--
Test case related to issue #6020: it checks that multi dimensional arrays
are correctly havoced when enforcing invariant contracts.

The `__CPROVER_same_object(old_data123, &(data[1][2][3]))` assertion is expected
to pass -- we should not mistakenly havoc the allocations, just their values.
However, the `data[1][2][3] == 0` assertion is expected to fail since `data`
is havoced.