File: intro.xml

package info (click to toggle)
cl-uffi 2.1.2-1.1
  • links: PTS
  • area: main
  • in suites: bookworm, bullseye, forky, sid, trixie
  • size: 1,028 kB
  • sloc: lisp: 3,854; xml: 2,990; makefile: 238; ansic: 169; sh: 35
file content (113 lines) | stat: -rw-r--r-- 4,124 bytes parent folder | download | duplicates (6)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE book PUBLIC "-//OASIS//DTD DocBook XML V4.2//EN"
"http://www.oasis-open.org/docbook/xml/4.2/docbookx.dtd" [
<!ENTITY % myents SYSTEM "entities.inc">
%myents;
]>

<chapter id="introduction">
  <title>Introduction</title>
  <sect1 id="purpose">
    <title>Purpose</title>
    <para>
      This reference guide describes &uffi;, a package that provides a
      cross-implementation interface from Common Lisp to C-language
      compatible libraries.
    </para>
  </sect1>
  
  <sect1 id="background">
    <title>Background
    </title>
    <para>
      Every Common Lisp implementation has a method for interfacing to
      C-language compatible libraries. These methods are often termed
      a <emphasis>Foreign Function Library Interface</emphasis>
      (&ffi;). Unfortunately, these methods vary widely amongst
      implementations, thus preventing the writing of a portable FFI
      to a particular C-library.
    </para>
    <para>
      &uffi; gathers a common subset of functionality between Common
      Lisp implementations. &uffi; wraps this common subset of
      functionality with it's own syntax and provides macro
      translation of uffi functions into the specific syntax of
      supported Common Lisp implementations.
    </para>
    <para>
      Developers who use &uffi; to interface with C libraries will
      automatically have their code function in each of uffi's supported
      implementations.
    </para>
  </sect1>

  <sect1 id="supported-impl">
    <title>Supported Implementations</title> 
    <para>The primary tested and supported platforms for &uffi; are: 
    </para>
    <itemizedlist mark="opencircle">
      <listitem><para>&acl; v6.2 on Debian GNU/Linux
      FreeBSD 4.5, Solaris v2.8, and Microsoft Windows XP.</para></listitem>
      <listitem><para>&lw; v4.2 on Debian GNU/Linux and Microsoft Windows XP.</para></listitem>
      <listitem><para>&cmucl; 18d on Debian GNU/Linux, FreeBSD 4.5, and Solaris 2.8</para></listitem>
      <listitem><para>&sbcl; 0.7.8 on Debian GNU/Linux</para></listitem>
      <listitem><para>&scl; 1.1.1 on Debian GNU/Linux</para></listitem>
      <listitem><para>&openmcl; 0.13 on Debian GNU/Linux for PowerPC</para></listitem>
    </itemizedlist>
    <para>Beta code is included with &uffi; for
    </para>
    <itemizedlist mark="opencircle">
      <listitem><para>&openmcl; and &mcl; with MacOSX</para></listitem>
    </itemizedlist>
  </sect1>

  <sect1 id="design">
    <title>Design</title>
    <sect2>
      <title>Overview</title>
      <para>
	&uffi; was designed as a cross-implementation 
	compatible <emphasis>Foreign Function Interface</emphasis>.
	Necessarily,
	only a common subset of functionality can be
	provided. Likewise, not every optimization for that a specific
	implementation provides can be supported. Wherever possible,
	though, implementation-specific optimizations are invoked.
      </para> 
    </sect2>

    <sect2>
      <title>Priorities</title>
      <para>
	The design of &uffi; is dictated by the order of these priorities:
      </para>
      <itemizedlist>
	<listitem>
	  <para>
	    Code using &uffi; must operate correctly on all
	    supported implementations.
	  </para>
	</listitem>
	<listitem>
	  <para>
	    Take advantage of implementation-specific optimizations. Ideally, 
	    there will not a situation where an implementation-specific
	    &ffi; will be chosen due to lack of optimizations in &uffi;.
	  </para>
	</listitem>
	<listitem>
	  <para>Provide a simple interface to developers using
	  &uffi;.  This priority is quite a bit lower than the above priorities.
	  This lower priority is manifest by programmers having to pass types in
	  pointer and array dereferencing, needing to use
	  <constant>cstring</constant> wrapper functions, and the use of
	  ensure-char-character and ensure-char-integer functions. My hope is
	  that the developer inconvenience will be outweighed by the generation
	  of optimized code that is cross-implementation compatible.
	  </para>
	</listitem>
      </itemizedlist>
    </sect2>
  </sect1>

</chapter>