1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
|
From pcanal@fndaub Tue Jul 8 13:42:37 1997
Received: from fndaub.fnal.gov by fncrd8.fnal.gov via ESMTP (950413.SGI.8.6.12/911001.SGI)
for <mf@fncrd8.fnal.gov> id NAA01517; Tue, 8 Jul 1997 13:41:35 -0500
Received: from localhost by fndaub.fnal.gov via SMTP (951211.SGI.8.6.12.PATCH1042/911001.SGI)
id NAA13661; Tue, 8 Jul 1997 13:41:34 -0500
Message-Id: <199707081841.NAA13661@fndaub.fnal.gov>
X-Mailer: exmh version 1.6.6 3/24/96
To: mf (Mark Fischler)
cc: pcanal@fndaub
Subject: Re: ZOOM exceptions
In-reply-to: Your message of "Tue, 08 Jul 1997 10:33:49 CDT."
<199707081533.KAA18029@fncrdn.fnal.gov>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: Tue, 08 Jul 1997 13:41:34 CDT
From: Philippe Canal <pcanal@fndaub>
Status: RO
> 4 - ZMexcept has signature
>
> void ZMexcept ( ZMexception x, int line,
> char file[], char data[], char time[]);
>
This signature worries me in the following sense:
by receiving explicitly a ZMexception, ZMExcept do not get any
type information (except for the id).
if ZMExcept throw the exception it will throw an exception of
type ZMexception not the intended type!
|
