File: codenarc-rules-concurrency.html

package info (click to toggle)
codenarc 0.23-6
  • links: PTS, VCS
  • area: main
  • in suites: forky, sid, trixie
  • size: 11,316 kB
  • sloc: java: 2,530; xml: 1,088; makefile: 13
file content (1046 lines) | stat: -rw-r--r-- 48,234 bytes parent folder | download | duplicates (3)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
543
544
545
546
547
548
549
550
551
552
553
554
555
556
557
558
559
560
561
562
563
564
565
566
567
568
569
570
571
572
573
574
575
576
577
578
579
580
581
582
583
584
585
586
587
588
589
590
591
592
593
594
595
596
597
598
599
600
601
602
603
604
605
606
607
608
609
610
611
612
613
614
615
616
617
618
619
620
621
622
623
624
625
626
627
628
629
630
631
632
633
634
635
636
637
638
639
640
641
642
643
644
645
646
647
648
649
650
651
652
653
654
655
656
657
658
659
660
661
662
663
664
665
666
667
668
669
670
671
672
673
674
675
676
677
678
679
680
681
682
683
684
685
686
687
688
689
690
691
692
693
694
695
696
697
698
699
700
701
702
703
704
705
706
707
708
709
710
711
712
713
714
715
716
717
718
719
720
721
722
723
724
725
726
727
728
729
730
731
732
733
734
735
736
737
738
739
740
741
742
743
744
745
746
747
748
749
750
751
752
753
754
755
756
757
758
759
760
761
762
763
764
765
766
767
768
769
770
771
772
773
774
775
776
777
778
779
780
781
782
783
784
785
786
787
788
789
790
791
792
793
794
795
796
797
798
799
800
801
802
803
804
805
806
807
808
809
810
811
812
813
814
815
816
817
818
819
820
821
822
823
824
825
826
827
828
829
830
831
832
833
834
835
836
837
838
839
840
841
842
843
844
845
846
847
848
849
850
851
852
853
854
855
856
857
858
859
860
861
862
863
864
865
866
867
868
869
870
871
872
873
874
875
876
877
878
879
880
881
882
883
884
885
886
887
888
889
890
891
892
893
894
895
896
897
898
899
900
901
902
903
904
905
906
907
908
909
910
911
912
913
914
915
916
917
918
919
920
921
922
923
924
925
926
927
928
929
930
931
932
933
934
935
936
937
938
939
940
941
942
943
944
945
946
947
948
949
950
951
952
953
954
955
956
957
958
959
960
961
962
963
964
965
966
967
968
969
970
971
972
973
974
975
976
977
978
979
980
981
982
983
984
985
986
987
988
989
990
991
992
993
994
995
996
997
998
999
1000
1001
1002
1003
1004
1005
1006
1007
1008
1009
1010
1011
1012
1013
1014
1015
1016
1017
1018
1019
1020
1021
1022
1023
1024
1025
1026
1027
1028
1029
1030
1031
1032
1033
1034
1035
1036
1037
1038
1039
1040
1041
1042
1043
1044
1045
1046
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<!-- Generated by Apache Maven Doxia Site Renderer 1.4 at 18 Feb 2015 -->
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xml:lang="en" lang="en">
  <head>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8" />
    <title>CodeNarc - CodeNarc - Concurrency Rules</title>
    <style type="text/css" media="all">
      @import url("./css/maven-base.css");
      @import url("./css/maven-theme.css");
      @import url("./css/site.css");
    </style>
    <link rel="stylesheet" href="./css/print.css" type="text/css" media="print" />
    <meta name="Date-Revision-yyyymmdd" content="20150218" />
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Language" content="en" />
                  
        </head>
  <body class="composite">
    <div id="banner">
                                              <a href="./" id="bannerLeft">
                                                <img src="images/codenarc-logo.png" alt="CodeNarc" />
                </a>
                              <a href="http://github.com/CodeNarc" id="bannerRight">
                                                <img src="images/forkme_right_red_aa0000.png" alt="Fork me on GitHub" />
                </a>
            <div class="clear">
        <hr/>
      </div>
    </div>
    <div id="breadcrumbs">
            
                    
                <div class="xleft">
        <span id="publishDate">Last Published: 18 Feb 2015</span>
                  &nbsp;| <span id="projectVersion">Version: 0.23</span>
                      </div>
            <div class="xright">        
                    
      </div>
      <div class="clear">
        <hr/>
      </div>
    </div>
    <div id="leftColumn">
      <div id="navcolumn">
             
                    
                                <h5>General</h5>
                  <ul>
                  <li class="none">
                          <a href="index.html" title="Home">Home</a>
            </li>
                  <li class="none">
                          <a href="https://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=250145" class="externalLink" title="Downloads">Downloads</a>
            </li>
                  <li class="none">
                          <a href="apidocs/index.html" title="Javadocs">Javadocs</a>
            </li>
                  <li class="none">
                          <a href="http://sourceforge.net/mail/?group_id=250145" class="externalLink" title="Mailing Lists">Mailing Lists</a>
            </li>
                  <li class="none">
                          <a href="http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?group_id=250145" class="externalLink" title="Bug Tracker">Bug Tracker</a>
            </li>
                  <li class="none">
                          <a href="http://sourceforge.net/projects/codenarc" class="externalLink" title="SourceForge Project">SourceForge Project</a>
            </li>
                  <li class="none">
                          <a href="http://github.com/CodeNarc" class="externalLink" title="GitHub Project">GitHub Project</a>
            </li>
          </ul>
                       <h5>Running</h5>
                  <ul>
                  <li class="none">
                          <a href="codenarc-ant-task.html" title="Ant Task Usage">Ant Task Usage</a>
            </li>
                  <li class="none">
                          <a href="codenarc-command-line.html" title="Command-Line">Command-Line</a>
            </li>
                  <li class="none">
                          <a href="codenarc-run-as-a-test.html" title="Run as a Test">Run as a Test</a>
            </li>
                  <li class="none">
                          <a href="codenarc-other-tools-frameworks.html" title="Other Tools/Frameworks">Other Tools/Frameworks</a>
            </li>
          </ul>
                       <h5>Using</h5>
                  <ul>
                  <li class="none">
                          <a href="codenarc-creating-ruleset.html" title="Creating a RuleSet">Creating a RuleSet</a>
            </li>
                  <li class="none">
                          <a href="codenarc-creating-rule.html" title="Creating a Rule">Creating a Rule</a>
            </li>
                  <li class="none">
                          <a href="codenarc-configuring-rules.html" title="Configuring Rules">Configuring Rules</a>
            </li>
                  <li class="none">
                          <a href="StarterRuleSet-AllRulesByCategory.groovy.txt" title="Starter RuleSet (All)">Starter RuleSet (All)</a>
            </li>
          </ul>
                       <h5>Report Types</h5>
                  <ul>
                  <li class="none">
                          <a href="codenarc-HtmlReportWriter.html" title="HTML Report">HTML Report</a>
            </li>
                  <li class="none">
                          <a href="codenarc-XmlReportWriter.html" title="XML Report">XML Report</a>
            </li>
                  <li class="none">
                          <a href="codenarc-TextReportWriter.html" title="Text and IDE Reports">Text and IDE Reports</a>
            </li>
          </ul>
                       <h5>Sample Reports</h5>
                  <ul>
                  <li class="none">
                          <a href="SampleCodeNarcHtmlReport.html" title="Sample HTML Report">Sample HTML Report</a>
            </li>
                  <li class="none">
                          <a href="SampleCodeNarcXmlReport.xml" title="Sample XML Report">Sample XML Report</a>
            </li>
          </ul>
                       <h5>Rules</h5>
                  <ul>
                  <li class="none">
                          <a href="codenarc-rule-index.html" title="Rule Index">Rule Index</a>
            </li>
                  <li class="none">
                          <a href="codenarc-rules-basic.html" title="Basic Rules">Basic Rules</a>
            </li>
                  <li class="none">
                          <a href="codenarc-rules-braces.html" title="Braces Rules">Braces Rules</a>
            </li>
                  <li class="none">
            <strong>Concurrency Rules</strong>
          </li>
                  <li class="none">
                          <a href="codenarc-rules-convention.html" title="Convention Rules">Convention Rules</a>
            </li>
                  <li class="none">
                          <a href="codenarc-rules-design.html" title="Design Rules">Design Rules</a>
            </li>
                  <li class="none">
                          <a href="codenarc-rules-dry.html" title="DRY Rules">DRY Rules</a>
            </li>
                  <li class="none">
                          <a href="codenarc-rules-enhanced.html" title="Enhanced Rules">Enhanced Rules</a>
            </li>
                  <li class="none">
                          <a href="codenarc-rules-exceptions.html" title="Exceptions Rules">Exceptions Rules</a>
            </li>
                  <li class="none">
                          <a href="codenarc-rules-formatting.html" title="Formatting Rules">Formatting Rules</a>
            </li>
                  <li class="none">
                          <a href="codenarc-rules-generic.html" title="Generic Rules">Generic Rules</a>
            </li>
                  <li class="none">
                          <a href="codenarc-rules-grails.html" title="Grails Rules">Grails Rules</a>
            </li>
                  <li class="none">
                          <a href="codenarc-rules-groovyism.html" title="Groovyism Rules">Groovyism Rules</a>
            </li>
                  <li class="none">
                          <a href="codenarc-rules-imports.html" title="Imports Rules">Imports Rules</a>
            </li>
                  <li class="none">
                          <a href="codenarc-rules-jdbc.html" title="JDBC Rules">JDBC Rules</a>
            </li>
                  <li class="none">
                          <a href="codenarc-rules-junit.html" title="JUnit Rules">JUnit Rules</a>
            </li>
                  <li class="none">
                          <a href="codenarc-rules-logging.html" title="Logging Rules">Logging Rules</a>
            </li>
                  <li class="none">
                          <a href="codenarc-rules-naming.html" title="Naming Rules">Naming Rules</a>
            </li>
                  <li class="none">
                          <a href="codenarc-rules-size.html" title="Size/Complexity Rules">Size/Complexity Rules</a>
            </li>
                  <li class="none">
                          <a href="codenarc-rules-security.html" title="Security Rules">Security Rules</a>
            </li>
                  <li class="none">
                          <a href="codenarc-rules-serialization.html" title="Serialization Rules">Serialization Rules</a>
            </li>
                  <li class="none">
                          <a href="codenarc-rules-unnecessary.html" title="Unnecessary Rules">Unnecessary Rules</a>
            </li>
                  <li class="none">
                          <a href="codenarc-rules-unused.html" title="Unused Rules">Unused Rules</a>
            </li>
          </ul>
                       <h5>Developing</h5>
                  <ul>
                  <li class="none">
                          <a href="codenarc-developer-guide.html" title="Developer Guide">Developer Guide</a>
            </li>
          </ul>
                       <h5>Project Documentation</h5>
                  <ul>
                                                                    <li class="collapsed">
                          <a href="project-info.html" title="Project Information">Project Information</a>
                  </li>
                                                                                                                          <li class="collapsed">
                          <a href="project-reports.html" title="Project Reports">Project Reports</a>
                  </li>
          </ul>
                                                                                                                               <a href="http://sourceforge.net" title="Hosted on SourceForge.net" class="poweredBy">
        <img class="poweredBy"  alt="Hosted on SourceForge.net" src="http://sflogo.sourceforge.net/sflogo.php?group_id=208647&type=2"     />
      </a>
                                                                                                                      <a href="http://maven.apache.org" title="Build with Maven 2" class="poweredBy">
        <img class="poweredBy"  alt="Build with Maven 2" src="images/logos/maven-feather.png"     />
      </a>
                       
                    
            </div>
    </div>
    <div id="bodyColumn">
      <div id="contentBox">
        <div class="section">
<h2>Concurrency Rules (&quot;<i>rulesets/concurrency.xml</i>&quot;)<a name="Concurrency_Rules_rulesetsconcurrency.xml"></a></h2><!-- ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ -->
<div class="section">
<h3><a name="BusyWait">BusyWait</a> Rule<a name="BusyWait_Rule"></a></h3><!-- ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ -->
<p><i>New in CodeNarc 0.13</i></p>
<p>Busy waiting (forcing a <tt>Thread.sleep()</tt> while waiting on a condition) should be avoided. Prefer using the gate and barrier objects in the <tt>java.util.concurrent</tt> package.</p>
<p>Example of violations:</p>
<div>
<pre>    while (x) { Thread.sleep(1000) }
    while (x) { Thread.sleep(1000) { /* interruption handler */} }
    for (int x = 10; x; x--) {
        sleep(1000)     // sleep is added to Object in Groovy
    }

    // here is the proper way to wait:
    countDownLatch.await()

    // this is weird code to write, but does not cause a violation
    for (def x : collections) {
        sleep(1000)
    }

    while (x) {
        // you should use a lock here, but technically you are
        // not just busy waiting because you are doing other work
        doSomething()
        sleep(1000)
    }
</pre></div></div>
<div class="section">
<h3><a name="DoubleCheckedLocking">DoubleCheckedLocking</a> Rule<a name="DoubleCheckedLocking_Rule"></a></h3><!-- ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ -->
<p><i>New in CodeNarc 0.13</i></p>
<p>This rule detects double checked locking, where a 'lock hint' is tested for null before initializing an object within a synchronized block. Double checked locking does not guarantee correctness and is an anti-pattern.</p>
<p>A full explanation of why double checked locking is broken in Java is available on Wikipedia: <a class="externalLink" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Double-checked_locking"></a></p>
<p>Example of violations:</p>
<div>
<pre>    if (object == null) {
        synchronized(this) {
            if (object == null) {
                // createObject() could be called twice depending
                // on the Thread Scheduler.
                object = createObject()
            }
        }
    }

    // there are several idioms to fix this problem.
    def result = object;
    if (result == null) {
        synchronized(this) {
            result = object;
            if (result == null)
                object = result = createObject()
        }
    }

    // and a better solution for a singleton:
    class myClass  {
        private static class ObjectHolder {
           public static Object object = createObject()
        }
        public static Object getObject() {
            return ObjectHolder.object;
        }
    }
</pre></div></div>
<div class="section">
<h3><a name="InconsistentPropertyLocking">InconsistentPropertyLocking</a> Rule<a name="InconsistentPropertyLocking_Rule"></a></h3><!-- ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ -->
<p><i>New in CodeNarc 0.13</i></p>
<p>Class contains similarly-named get and set methods where one method of the pair is marked either @WithReadLock or @WithWriteLock and the other is not locked at all. This may result in incorrect behavior at runtime, as callers of the get and set methods will not necessarily lock correctly and my see an inconsistent state for the object. The get and set method should both be guarded by @WithReadLock/@WithWriteLock or neither should be guarded.</p>
<p>Example of violations:</p>
<div>
<pre>    class Person {
        String name
        Date birthday
        boolean deceased
        boolean parent

        @WithWriteLock setName(String name) {
            this.name = name
        }
        // violation, get method should be locked
        String getName() {
            name
        }

        // violation, set method should be locked
        void setBirthday(Date birthday) {
            this.birthday = birthday
        }

        @WithReadLock String getBirthday() {
            birthday
        }

        // violation, set method should be locked
        void setDeceased(boolean deceased) {
            this.deceased = deceased
        }

        @WithReadLock boolean isDeceased() {
            deceased
        }

        @WithWriteLock void setParent(boolean parent) {
            this.parent = parent
        }

        // violation, get method should be locked
        boolean isParent() {
            parent
        }
    }
</pre></div></div>
<div class="section">
<h3><a name="InconsistentPropertySynchronization">InconsistentPropertySynchronization</a> Rule<a name="InconsistentPropertySynchronization_Rule"></a></h3><!-- ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ -->
<p><i>New in CodeNarc 0.13</i></p>
<p>Class contains similarly-named get and set methods where the set method is synchronized and the get method is not, or the get method is synchronized and the set method is not. This may result in incorrect behavior at runtime, as callers of the get and set methods will not necessarily see a consistent state for the object. The get and set method should both be synchronized or neither should be synchronized.</p>
<p>Example of violations:</p>
<div>
<pre>    class Person {
        String name
        Date birthday
        boolean deceased
        boolean parent
        int weight

        synchronized setName(String name) {
            this.name = name
        }
        // violation, get method should be synchronized
        String getName() {
            name
        }

        // violation, set method should be synchronized
        void setBirthday(Date birthday) {
            this.birthday = birthday
        }

        synchronized String getBirthday() {
            birthday
        }

        // violation, set method should be synchronized
        void setDeceased(boolean deceased) {
            this.deceased = deceased
        }

        synchronized boolean isDeceased() {
            deceased
        }

        synchronized void setParent(boolean parent) {
            this.parent = parent
        }

        // violation, get method should be synchronized
        boolean isParent() {
            parent
        }

        // violation get method should be synchronized
        @groovy.transform.Synchronized
        void setWeight(int value) {
            weight = value
        }
    }
</pre></div></div>
<div class="section">
<h3><a name="NestedSynchronization">NestedSynchronization</a> Rule<a name="NestedSynchronization_Rule"></a></h3><!-- ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ -->
<p>This rule reports occurrences of nested <tt>synchronized</tt> statements.</p>
<p>Nested <tt>synchronized</tt> statements should be avoided. Nested <tt>synchronized</tt> statements are either useless (if the lock objects are identical) or prone to deadlock.</p>
<p>Note that a <i>closure</i> or an <i>anonymous inner class</i> carries its own context (scope). A <tt>synchronized</tt> statement within a <i>closure</i> or an <i>anonymous inner class</i> defined within an outer <tt>synchronized</tt> statement does not cause a violation (though nested <tt>synchronized</tt> statements within either of those will).</p>
<p>Here is an example of code that produces a violation:</p>
<div>
<pre>    def myMethod() {
        synchronized(this) {
            // do something ...
            synchronized(this) {
                // do something else ...
            }
        }
    }
</pre></div></div>
<div class="section">
<h3><a name="StaticCalendarField">StaticCalendarField</a> Rule<a name="StaticCalendarField_Rule"></a></h3><!-- ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ -->
<p><i>New in CodeNarc 0.13</i></p>
<p><tt>Calendar</tt> objects should not be used as <tt>static</tt> fields. Calendars are inherently unsafe for multithreaded use. Sharing a single instance across thread boundaries without proper synchronization will result in erratic behavior of the application. Under 1.4 problems seem to surface less often than under Java 5 where you will probably see random <tt>ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException</tt> or <tt>IndexOutOfBoundsException</tt> in <tt>sun.util.calendar.BaseCalendar.getCalendarDateFromFixedDate()</tt>. You may also experience serialization problems. Using an instance field or a <tt>ThreadLocal</tt> is recommended.</p>
<p>For more information on this see Sun Bug #6231579 and Sun Bug #6178997.</p>
<p>Examples:</p>
<div>
<pre>    // Violations
    class MyClass {
        static Calendar calendar1
        static java.util.Calendar calendar2

        static final CAL1 = Calendar.getInstance()
        static final CAL2 = Calendar.getInstance(Locale.FRANCE)
        static def cal3 = Calendar.getInstance(timezone)
        static Object cal4 = Calendar.getInstance(timezone, locale)
    }

    // These usages are OK
    class MyCorrectClass {
        private final Calendar calendar1
        static ThreadLocal&lt;Calendar&gt; calendar2
    }
</pre></div></div>
<div class="section">
<h3><a name="StaticConnection">StaticConnection</a> Rule<a name="StaticConnection_Rule"></a></h3><!-- ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ -->
<p><i>New in CodeNarc 0.14</i></p>
<p>Creates violations when a <tt>java.sql.Connection</tt> object is used as a <tt>static</tt> field. Database connections stored in <tt>static</tt> fields will be shared between threads, which is unsafe and can lead to race conditions.</p>
<p>A transactional resource object such as database connection can only be associated with one transaction at a time. For this reason, a connection should not be shared between threads and should not be stored in a static field. See Section 4.2.3 of the <i>J2EE Specification</i> for more details.</p>
<p>References:</p>
<ul>
<li>Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3 - (STIG 3) APP3630.1 CAT II</li>
<li>Standards Mapping - Common Weakness Enumeration - (CWE) CWE ID 362, CWE ID 567</li>
<li>Standards Mapping - SANS Top 25 2009 - (SANS 2009) Insecure Interaction - CWE ID 362</li>
<li>Standards Mapping - SANS Top 25 2010 - (SANS 2010) Insecure Interaction - CWE ID 362</li>
<li>Java 2 Platform Enterprise Edition Specification, v1.4 Sun Microsystems</li></ul></div>
<div class="section">
<h3><a name="StaticDateFormatField">StaticDateFormatField</a> Rule<a name="StaticDateFormatField_Rule"></a></h3><!-- ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ -->
<p><i>New in CodeNarc 0.13</i></p>
<p><tt>DateFormat</tt> objects should not be used as <tt>static</tt> fields. DateFormats are inherently unsafe for multithreaded use. Sharing a single instance across thread boundaries without proper synchronization will result in erratic behavior of the application. Under 1.4 problems seem to surface less often than under Java 5 where you will probably see random <tt>ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException</tt> or <tt>IndexOutOfBoundsException</tt> in <tt>sun.util.calendar.BaseCalendar.getCalendarDateFromFixedDate()</tt>. You may also experience serialization problems. Using an instance field or a <tt>ThreadLocal</tt> is recommended.</p>
<p>For more information on this see Sun Bug #6231579 and Sun Bug #6178997.</p>
<p>Examples:</p>
<div>
<pre>    // Violations
    class MyClass {
        static DateFormat dateFormat1
        static java.text.DateFormat dateFormat2

        static final DATE1 = DateFormat.getDateInstance(DateFormat.LONG, Locale.FRANCE)
        static final def DATE2 = DateFormat.getDateInstance(DateFormat.LONG)
        static Object date3 = DateFormat.getDateInstance()

        static final DATETIME1 = DateFormat.getDateTimeInstance(DateFormat.LONG, DateFormat.SHORT, Locale.FRANCE)
        static final def DATETIME2 = DateFormat.getDateTimeInstance(DateFormat.LONG, DateFormat.SHORT)
        static final Object DATETIME3 = DateFormat.getDateTimeInstance()

        static final TIME1 = DateFormat.getTimeInstance(DateFormat.LONG, Locale.FRANCE)
        static final def TIME2 = DateFormat.getTimeInstance(DateFormat.LONG)
        static final Object TIME3 = DateFormat.getTimeInstance()
    }

    // These usages are OK
    class MyCorrectClass {
        private DateFormat calendar1
        static ThreadLocal&lt;DateFormat&gt; calendar2
    }
</pre></div></div>
<div class="section">
<h3><a name="StaticMatcherField">StaticMatcherField</a> Rule<a name="StaticMatcherField_Rule"></a></h3><!-- ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ -->
<p><i>New in CodeNarc 0.13</i></p>
<p>Matcher objects should not be used as static fields. Calendars are inherently unsafe for multithreaded use. Sharing a single instance across thread boundaries without proper synchronization will result in erratic behavior of the application.</p>
<p>Example of violations:</p>
<div>
<pre>    // two violations
    class MyClass {
      static Matcher matcher1
      static java.util.regex.Matcher matcher2
    }

    // these usages are OK
    class MyCorrectClass {
      private Matcher matcher1
      static ThreadLocal&lt;Matcher&gt; matcher2
    }
</pre></div></div>
<div class="section">
<h3><a name="StaticSimpleDateFormatField">StaticSimpleDateFormatField</a> Rule<a name="StaticSimpleDateFormatField_Rule"></a></h3><!-- ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ -->
<p><i>New in CodeNarc 0.14</i></p>
<p><tt>SimpleDateFormat</tt> objects should not be used as <tt>static</tt> fields. SimpleDateFormats are inherently unsafe for multithreaded use. Sharing a single instance across thread boundaries without proper synchronization will result in erratic behavior of the application. Under 1.4 problems seem to surface less often than under Java 5 where you will probably see random <tt>ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException</tt> or <tt>IndexOutOfBoundsException</tt> in <tt>sun.util.calendar.BaseCalendar.getCalendarDateFromFixedDate()</tt>. You may also experience serialization problems. Using an instance field or a <tt>ThreadLocal</tt> is recommended.</p>
<p>For more information on this see Sun Bug #6231579 and Sun Bug #6178997.</p>
<p>Examples:</p>
<div>
<pre>    // Violations
    class MyClass {
        static SimpleDateFormat dateFormat1
        static java.text.SimpleDateFormat dateFormat2

        static final DATE1 = new SimpleDateFormat()
        static final DATE2 = new SimpleDateFormat('MM/dd')
        static final DATE3 = new SimpleDateFormat('MM/dd', DateFormatSymbols.instance)
        static date4 = new SimpleDateFormat('MM/dd', Locale.FRANCE)
        static date5 = new java.text.SimpleDateFormat('MM/dd')
    }

    // These usages are OK
    class MyCorrectClass {
        private SimpleDateFormat calendar1
        static ThreadLocal&lt;SimpleDateFormat&gt; calendar2
    }
</pre></div></div>
<div class="section">
<h3><a name="SynchronizedMethod">SynchronizedMethod</a> Rule<a name="SynchronizedMethod_Rule"></a></h3><!-- ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ -->
<p>This rule reports uses of the <tt>synchronized</tt> keyword on methods. Synchronized methods are the same as synchronizing on 'this', which effectively make your synchronization policy public and modifiable by other objects. To avoid possibilities of deadlock, it is better to synchronize on internal objects.</p>
<p>Here is an example of code that produces a violation:</p>
<div>
<pre>    synchronized def myMethod() {
        // do stuff ...
    }
</pre></div></div>
<div class="section">
<h3><a name="SynchronizedOnGetClass">SynchronizedOnGetClass</a> Rule<a name="SynchronizedOnGetClass_Rule"></a></h3><!-- ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ -->
<p><i>Since CodeNarc 0.11</i></p>
<p>Checks for synchronization on <tt>getClass()</tt> rather than class literal. This instance method synchronizes on <tt>this.getClass()</tt>. If this class is subclassed, subclasses will synchronize on the class object for the subclass, which isn't likely what was intended.</p></div>
<div class="section">
<h3><a name="SynchronizedOnBoxedPrimitive">SynchronizedOnBoxedPrimitive</a> Rule<a name="SynchronizedOnBoxedPrimitive_Rule"></a></h3><!-- ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ -->
<p><i>New in CodeNarc 0.13</i></p>
<p>The code synchronizes on a boxed primitive constant, such as an Integer. Since Integer objects can be cached and shared, this code could be synchronizing on the same object as other, unrelated code, leading to unresponsiveness and possible deadlock.</p>
<p>Example of violations:</p>
<div>
<pre>    class MyClass {
        Byte byte1 = 100
        Short short1 = 1
        Double double1 = 1
        Integer integer1 = 1
        Long long1 = 1
        Float float1 = 1
        Character char1 = 1

        byte byte2 = getValue()
        short short2 = getValue()
        double double2 = getValue()
        int integer2 = getValue()
        long long2 = getValue()
        float float2 = getValue()
        char char2 = getValue()

        def byte3 = new Byte((byte)100)
        def short3 = new Short((short)1)
        def double3 = new Double((double)1)
        def integer3 = new Integer(1)
        def long3 = new Long(1)
        def float3 = new Float(1)
        def char3 = new Character((char)'1')

        def byte4 = 1 as byte
        def short4 = 1 as short
        def double4 = 1 as double
        def integer4 = 1 as int
        def long4 = 1 as long
        def float4 = 1 as float
        def char4 = 1 as char

        def byte5 = 1 as Byte
        def short5 = 1 as Short
        def double5 = 1 as Double
        def integer5 = 1 as Integer
        def long5 = 1 as Long
        def float5 = 1 as Float
        def char5 = 1 as Character

        def byte6 = (byte)1
        def short6 = (short)1
        def double6 = (double)1
        def integer6 = (int)1
        def long6 = (long)1
        def float6 = (float)1
        def char6 = (char)1

        def method() {
            // all of these synchronization blocks produce violations
            synchronized(byte1) {}
            synchronized(short1) {}
            synchronized(double1) {}
            synchronized(integer1) {}
            synchronized(long1) {}
            synchronized(float1) {}
            synchronized(char1) {}

            synchronized(byte2) {}
            synchronized(short2) {}
            synchronized(double2) {}
            synchronized(integer2) {}
            synchronized(long2) {}
            synchronized(float2) {}
            synchronized(char2) {}

            synchronized(byte3) {}
            synchronized(short3) {}
            synchronized(double3) {}
            synchronized(integer3) {}
            synchronized(long3) {}
            synchronized(float3) {}
            synchronized(char3) {}

            synchronized(byte4) {}
            synchronized(short4) {}
            synchronized(double4) {}
            synchronized(integer4) {}
            synchronized(long4) {}
            synchronized(float4) {}
            synchronized(char4) {}

            synchronized(byte5) {}
            synchronized(short5) {}
            synchronized(double5) {}
            synchronized(integer5) {}
            synchronized(long5) {}
            synchronized(float5) {}
            synchronized(char5) {}

            synchronized(byte6) {}
            synchronized(short6) {}
            synchronized(double6) {}
            synchronized(integer6) {}
            synchronized(long6) {}
            synchronized(float6) {}
            synchronized(char6) {}
        }
    }
</pre></div>
<p>And here is an in-depth example of how it works within inner classes and such:</p>
<div>
<pre>    class MyClass {

        final String lock = false

        def method() {
            // violation
            synchronized(lock) { }
        }
    }

    class MyClass {

        final String lock = false

        class MyInnerClass {
            def method() {
                // violation
                synchronized(lock) { }
            }
        }
    }

    class MyClass {
        // implicit typing
        final def lock = true

        def method() {
            // violation
            synchronized(lock) { }
        }
    }

    class MyClass {
        // implicit typing
        final def lock = new Object[0] // correct idiom

        def method() {
            return new Runnable() {
                final def lock = false // shadows parent from inner class
                public void run() {
                    // violation
                    synchronized(stringLock) { }
                }
            }
        }
    }

    class MyClass {
        // implicit typing
        final def lock = new Object[0] // correct idiom

        class MyInnerClass {

            final def lock = true // shadows parent from inner class
            def method() {
                // violation
                synchronized(stringLock) { }
            }
        }
    }
</pre></div></div>
<div class="section">
<h3><a name="SynchronizedOnString">SynchronizedOnString</a> Rule<a name="SynchronizedOnString_Rule"></a></h3><!-- ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ -->
<p><i>New in CodeNarc 0.13</i></p>
<p>Synchronization on a String field can lead to deadlock. Constant Strings are interned and shared across all other classes loaded by the JVM. Thus, this could is locking on something that other code might also be locking. This could result in very strange and hard to diagnose blocking and deadlock behavior.</p>
<p>See <a class="externalLink" href="http://www.javalobby.org/java/forums/t96352.html and http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/JETTY-352">JETTY-352</a>.</p>
<p>Examples:</p>
<div>
<pre>    class MyClass {

        final String stringLock = &quot;stringLock&quot;

        def method() {
            // violation
            synchronized(stringLock) { }
        }
    }

    class MyClass {

        final String stringLock = &quot;stringLock&quot;

        class MyInnerClass {
            def method() {
                synchronized(stringLock) { }
            }
        }
    }

    class MyClass {
        // implicit typing
        final def stringLock = &quot;stringLock&quot;

        def method() {
            // violation
            synchronized(stringLock) { }
        }
    }

    class MyClass {
        // implicit typing
        final def lock = new Object[0] // correct idiom

        def method() {
            return new Runnable() {
                final def lock = &quot;&quot; // shadows parent from inner class
                public void run() {
                    // violation
                    synchronized(stringLock) { }
                }
            }
        }
    }

    class MyClass {
        // implicit typing
        final def lock = new Object[0] // correct idiom

        class MyInnerClass {

            final def lock = &quot;&quot; // shadows parent from inner class
            def method() {
                // violation
                synchronized(stringLock) { }
            }
        }
    }
</pre></div></div>
<div class="section">
<h3><a name="SynchronizedOnThis">SynchronizedOnThis</a> Rule<a name="SynchronizedOnThis_Rule"></a></h3><!-- ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ -->
<p>This rule reports uses of the <tt>synchronized</tt> blocks where the synchronization reference is 'this'. Doing this effectively makes your synchronization policy public and modifiable by other objects. To avoid possibilities of deadlock, it is better to synchronize on internal objects.</p>
<p>Here is an example of code that produces a violation:</p>
<div>
<pre>    def method3() {
        synchronized(this) {
            // do stuff ...
        }
    }
</pre></div></div>
<div class="section">
<h3><a name="SynchronizedReadObjectMethod">SynchronizedReadObjectMethod</a> Rule<a name="SynchronizedReadObjectMethod_Rule"></a></h3><!-- ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ -->
<p><i>New in CodeNarc 0.13</i></p>
<p>Catches Serializable classes that define a synchronized readObject method. By definition, an object created by deserialization is only reachable by one thread, and thus there is no need for readObject() to be synchronized. If the readObject() method itself is causing the object to become visible to another thread, that is an example of very dubious coding style.</p>
<p>Examples:</p>
<div>
<pre>    class MyClass implements Serializable {

        private synchronized void readObject(ObjectInputStream input) throws IOException, ClassNotFoundException {
            // violation, no need to synchronized
        }
    }

    class MyClass implements Serializable {

        private void readObject(ObjectInputStream input) throws IOException, ClassNotFoundException {
            synchronized(lock) {
                // violation, no need to synchronized
            }
        }
    }

    // OK, class not Serializable
    class MyClass {

        private synchronized void readObject(ObjectInputStream input) throws IOException, ClassNotFoundException { }
    }

    // OK, class not Serializable
    class MyClass {

        private void readObject(ObjectInputStream input) throws IOException, ClassNotFoundException {
            synchronized(lock) { }
        }
    }

    class MyClass implements Serializable {

        private void readObject(ObjectInputStream input) throws IOException, ClassNotFoundException {
            // OK, this block is more than just a simple sync statement
            synchronized(lock) { }
            doSomething()
        }
    }
</pre></div></div>
<div class="section">
<h3><a name="SynchronizedOnReentrantLock">SynchronizedOnReentrantLock</a> Rule<a name="SynchronizedOnReentrantLock_Rule"></a></h3><!-- ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ -->
<p><i>New in CodeNarc 0.13</i></p>
<p>Synchronizing on a ReentrantLock field is almost never the intended usage. A ReentrantLock should be obtained using the lock() method and released in a finally block using the unlock() method.</p>
<p>This rule take from Alex Miller's <a class="externalLink" href="http://www.slideshare.net/alexmiller/java-concurrency-gotchas-3666977">Java Concurrency in Practice</a> slides.</p>
<p>Here is the proper usage of ReentrantLock:</p>
<div>
<pre>    import java.util.concurrent.locks.ReentrantLock;
    final lock = new ReentrantLock();
    def method()  {
       //Trying to enter the critical section
       lock.lock(); // will wait until this thread gets the lock
       try {
          // critical section
       } finally {
          //releasing the lock so that other threads can get notifies
          lock.unlock();
       }
    }
</pre></div>
<p>Example of violations:</p>
<div>
<pre>    class MyClass {

        final ReentrantLock lock = new ReentrantLock()

        def method() {
            // violation
            synchronized(lock) { }
        }
    }

    class MyClass {

        final ReentrantLock lock = new ReentrantLock()

        class MyInnerClass {
            def method() {
                synchronized(lock) { }
            }
        }
    }

    class MyClass {
        // implicit typing
        final def lock = new ReentrantLock()

        def method() {
            // violation
            synchronized(lock) { }
        }
    }

    class MyClass {
        // implicit typing
        final def lock = new Object[0] // correct idiom

        def method() {
            return new Runnable() {
                final def lock = new ReentrantLock() // shadows parent from inner class
                public void run() {
                    // violation
                    synchronized(lock) { }
                }
            }
        }
    }

    class MyClass {
        // implicit typing
        final def lock = new Object[0] // correct idiom

        class MyInnerClass {

            final def lock = new ReentrantLock() // shadows parent from inner class
            def method() {
                // violation
                synchronized(lock) { }
            }
        }
    }
</pre></div></div>
<div class="section">
<h3><a name="SystemRunFinalizersOnExit">SystemRunFinalizersOnExit</a> Rule<a name="SystemRunFinalizersOnExit_Rule"></a></h3><!-- ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ -->
<p>This rule reports uses of the <tt>System.runFinalizersOnExit()</tt> method.</p>
<p>Method calls to <tt>System.runFinalizersOnExit()</tt> should not be allowed. This method is inherently non-thread-safe, may result in data corruption, deadlock, and may affect parts of the program far removed from it's call point. It is deprecated, and it's use strongly discouraged.</p>
<p>Here is an example of code that produces a violation:</p>
<div>
<pre>    def method() {
        System.runFinalizersOnExit(true)
    }
</pre></div></div>
<div class="section">
<h3><a name="ThisReferenceEscapesConstructor">ThisReferenceEscapesConstructor</a> Rule<a name="ThisReferenceEscapesConstructor_Rule"></a></h3><!-- ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ -->
<p><i>Since CodeNarc 0.19</i></p>
<p>Reports constructors passing the 'this' reference to other methods. This equals exposing a half-baked objects and can lead to race conditions during initialization. For reference, see <a class="externalLink" href="http://www.slideshare.net/alexmiller/java-concurrency-gotchas-3666977/38">Java Concurrency in Practice</a> by Alex Miller and <a class="externalLink" href="http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/java/library/j-jtp0618/index.html">Java theory and practice: Safe construction techniques</a> by Brian Goetz.</p>
<p>Example of violations:</p>
<div>
<pre>    class EventListener {
        EventListener(EventPublisher publisher) {
            publisher.register(this)            
            new WorkThread(publisher, this).start()
            new AnotherWorkThread(listener: this)
        }    
    }
</pre></div></div>
<div class="section">
<h3><a name="ThreadGroup">ThreadGroup</a> Rule<a name="ThreadGroup_Rule"></a></h3><!-- ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ -->
<p><i>New in CodeNarc 0.13</i></p>
<p>Avoid using <tt>ThreadGroup</tt>; although it is intended to be used in a threaded environment it contains methods that are not thread safe.</p>
<p>Here is an example of code that produces a violation:</p>
<div>
<pre>    new ThreadGroup(&quot;...&quot;)
    new ThreadGroup(tg, &quot;my thread group&quot;)
    Thread.currentThread().getThreadGroup()
    System.getSecurityManager().getThreadGroup()
</pre></div></div>
<div class="section">
<h3><a name="ThreadLocalNotStaticFinal">ThreadLocalNotStaticFinal</a> Rule<a name="ThreadLocalNotStaticFinal_Rule"></a></h3><!-- ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ -->
<p>This rule reports definition of the <tt>ThreadLocal</tt> fields that are not <tt>static</tt> and <tt>final</tt>.</p>
<p><i>ThreadLocal</i> fields should be <tt>static</tt> and <tt>final</tt>. In the most common case a <tt>java.lang.ThreadLocal</tt> instance associates state with a thread. A non-<tt>static</tt> non-<tt>final</tt> <tt>java.lang.ThreadLocal</tt> field associates state with an instance-thread combination. This is seldom necessary and often a bug which can cause memory leaks and possibly incorrect behavior.</p>
<p>Here is an example of code that produces a violation:</p>
<div>
<pre>    private static ThreadLocal local1 = new ThreadLocal()
    private final ThreadLocal local2 = new ThreadLocal()
    protected ThreadLocal local3 = new ThreadLocal()
    ThreadLocal local4 = new ThreadLocal()
</pre></div></div>
<div class="section">
<h3><a name="ThreadYield">ThreadYield</a> Rule<a name="ThreadYield_Rule"></a></h3><!-- ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ -->
<p>This rule reports uses of the <tt>Thread.yield()</tt> method.</p>
<p>Method calls to <tt>Thread.yield()</tt> should not be allowed. This method has no useful guaranteed semantics, and is often used by inexperienced programmers to mask race conditions.</p>
<p>Here is an example of code that produces a violation:</p>
<div>
<pre>     def method() {
         Thread.yield()
     }
</pre></div></div>
<div class="section">
<h3><a name="UseOfNotifyMethod">UseOfNotifyMethod</a> Rule<a name="UseOfNotifyMethod_Rule"></a></h3><!-- ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ -->
<p><i>Since CodeNarc 0.11</i></p>
<p>Checks for code that calls <tt>notify()</tt> rather than <tt>notifyAll()</tt>. Java monitors are often used for multiple conditions. Calling <tt>notify()</tt> only wakes up one thread, meaning that the awakened thread might not be the one waiting for the condition that the caller just satisfied.</p>
<p>Also see <a class="externalLink" href="http://www.javaconcurrencyinpractice.com/"><b>Java_Concurrency_in_Practice</b></a>, Brian Goetz, p 303.</p></div>
<div class="section">
<h3><a name="VolatileArrayField">VolatileArrayField</a> Rule<a name="VolatileArrayField_Rule"></a></h3><!-- ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ -->
<p><i>New in CodeNarc 0.13</i></p>
<p>Volatile array fields are unsafe because the contents of the array are not treated as volatile. Changing the entire array reference is visible to other threads, but changing an array element is not.</p>
<p>This rule take from Alex Miller's <i>Java Concurrency in Practice</i> slides, available at <a class="externalLink" href="http://www.slideshare.net/alexmiller/java-concurrency-gotchas-3666977">http://www.slideshare.net/alexmiller/java-concurrency-gotchas-3666977</a>.</p>
<p>Example of violations:</p>
<div>
<pre>    class MyClass {
        private volatile Object[] field1 = value()
        volatile field2 = value as Object[]
        volatile field3 = (Object[])foo
    }
</pre></div></div>
<div class="section">
<h3><a name="VolatileLongOrDoubleField">VolatileLongOrDoubleField</a> Rule<a name="VolatileLongOrDoubleField_Rule"></a></h3><!-- ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ -->
<p>This rule reports on <tt>long</tt> or <tt>double</tt> fields that are declared <tt>volatile</tt>.</p>
<p>Long or double fields should not be declared as <tt>volatile</tt>. Java specifies that reads and writes from such fields are atomic, but many JVM's have violated this specification. Unless you are certain of your JVM, it is better to synchronize access to such fields rather than declare them <tt>volatile</tt>. This rule flags fields marked <tt>volatile</tt> when their type is <tt>double</tt> or <tt>long</tt> or the name of their type is &quot;Double&quot; or &quot;Long&quot;.</p>
<p>Here is an example of code that produces a violation:</p>
<div>
<pre>     def method() {
         private volatile double d
         private volatile long f
     }
</pre></div></div>
<div class="section">
<h3><a name="WaitOutsideOfWhileLoop">WaitOutsideOfWhileLoop</a> Rule<a name="WaitOutsideOfWhileLoop_Rule"></a></h3><!-- ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ -->
<p><i>Since CodeNarc 0.13</i></p>
<p>Calls to <tt>Object.wait()</tt> must be within a <tt>while</tt> loop. This ensures that the awaited condition has not already been satisfied by another thread before the <tt>wait()</tt> is invoked. It also ensures that the proper thread was resumed and guards against incorrect notification. See [1] and [3].</p>
<p>As a more modern and flexible alternative, consider using the Java <i>concurrency utilities</i> instead of <tt>wait()</tt> and <tt>notify()</tt>. See discussion in <i>Effective Java</i> [2].</p>
<p>Example of violation:</p>
<div>
<pre>    class MyClass {
        private data

        void processData()
            synchronized(data) {
                if (!data.isReady()) {
                    data.wait()
                }
                data.calculateStatistics()
            }
        }
    }
</pre></div>
<p>Example of correct usage:</p>
<div>
<pre>    class MyClass {
        private data

        void processData()
            synchronized(data) {
                while (!data.isReady()) {
                    data.wait()
                }
                data.calculateStatistics()
            }
        }
    }
</pre></div>
<div class="section">
<h4>References<a name="References"></a></h4>
<ul>
<li>[1] <b>Effective Java, Programming Language Guide</b>, by Joshua Bloch. Addison Wesley (2001). Chapter 50 (1st edition) is entitled &quot;Never invoke wait outside a loop.&quot;</li>
<li>[2] <b>Effective Java</b>, 2nd edition, by Joshua Bloch, Addison Wesley (2008). Item #69: <i>Prefer concurrency utilities to wait and notify</i>.</li>
<li>[3] Software Engineering Institute - Secure Coding <a class="externalLink" href="https://www.securecoding.cert.org/confluence/display/java/THI03-J.+Always+invoke+wait()+and+await()+methods+inside+a+loop">discussion of this issue</a></li></ul></div></div></div>
      </div>
    </div>
    <div class="clear">
      <hr/>
    </div>
    <div id="footer">
      <div class="xright">
              Copyright &#169;                   2015.
          All Rights Reserved.      
                    
                  </div>
      <div class="clear">
        <hr/>
      </div>
    </div>
  </body>
</html>