1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
|
Feature: Nested Steps with either table or doc string
Background:
Given a scenario with a step that looks like this:
"""gherkin
Given two turtles
"""
Scenario: Use #step with table
Given a step definition that looks like this:
"""ruby
Given /turtles:/ do |table|
table.hashes.each do |row|
puts row[:name]
end
end
"""
And a step definition that looks like this:
"""ruby
Given /two turtles/ do
step %{turtles:}, table(%{
| name |
| Sturm |
| Liouville |
})
end
"""
When I run the feature with the progress formatter
Then the output should contain:
"""
Sturm
Liouville
"""
Scenario: Use #step with docstring
Given a step definition that looks like this:
"""ruby
Given /two turtles/ do
step %{turtles:}, "Sturm and Lioville"
end
"""
And a step definition that looks like this:
"""ruby
Given /turtles:/ do |text|
puts text
end
"""
When I run the feature with the progress formatter
Then the output should contain:
"""
Sturm and Lioville
"""
Scenario: Use #step with docstring and content-type
Given a step definition that looks like this:
"""ruby
Given /two turtles/ do
step %{turtles:}, doc_string('Sturm and Lioville','math')
end
"""
And a step definition that looks like this:
"""ruby
Given /turtles:/ do |text|
puts text.content_type
end
"""
When I run the feature with the progress formatter
Then the output should contain:
"""
math
"""
|
