1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366
|
<?xml version="1.0"?>
<!DOCTYPE chapter PUBLIC "-//OASIS//DTD DocBook XML V4.4//EN"
"/usr/share/sgml/docbook/dtd/xml/4.4/docbookx.dtd" [
<!ENTITY % included SYSTEM "included.ent">
%included;
]>
<chapter id="libpack">
<title>Packaging OCaml libraries</title>
<section>
<title>Creating packages for OCaml libraries</title>
<para>
A package which provides an OCaml library called <filename>xxx</filename> should be split as follows:
<itemizedlist>
<listitem>
<para>
For libraries which are not purely programmed in OCaml (e.g. C
bindings), <filename>libxxx-ocaml</filename> should provide the
shared library stubs (<filename>dll*.so</filename>), and all other
stuff needed to run a bytecode executable that links into this
library. It should depend on &ocaml-base-vpkg; as well as any other library needed. The
<emphasis>versioned</emphasis> dependency on &ocaml-base-pkg; is
important since libraries are binary incompatible between releases
of OCaml. </para> <para> <filename>libxxx-ocaml</filename>
packages should be in <code>Section: ocaml</code>.
</para>
<para>
If the library provides native plugins (<filename>*.cmxs</filename>)
or is meant to be dynamically loaded using the <code>Dynlink</code>
library, those plugins, relevant <filename>*.cmo</filename> or
<filename>*.cma</filename> files, and the <filename>META</filename>
file referencing them should also be provided by this runtime package.
</para>
</listitem>
<listitem>
<para>
<filename>libxxx-ocaml-dev</filename> should provide the rest of
the library package, in fact anything needed to develop programs
using the library. If the library uses other libraries or C
libraries then this package should depend on them. </para>
<para>
<filename>libxxx-ocaml-dev</filename> should depend on its
companion <filename>libxxx-ocaml</filename> package (if any).
The reason is that at compile time the &ocaml-name; compiler
will try to load the shared library stubs, aborting the
compilation in case of failure. Hence the development package
is useless if the corresponding stub package is missing. To
ensure compatibility the dependency among the two packages
should be strictly versioned. In order for the resulting
packages to be <ulink
url="http://wiki.debian.org/binNMU">binNMU safe</ulink> this
requirement states that the dependency should make use of a
<code>${binary:Version}</code> substitution variable.
<example>
<title>Dependency from a -dev package to its companion shared
library stub package (if any), from the
<application>pcre-ocaml</application> package</title>
<programlisting>
Package: libpcre-ocaml
Architecture: any
Section: ocaml
Depends: &ocaml-base-vpkg;, ${shlibs:Depends}, ${misc:Depends}
...
Package: libpcre-ocaml-dev
Architecture: any
Section: ocaml
Depends: &ocaml-vpkg;, libpcre3-dev (>= 4.5), <emphasis>libpcre-ocaml (= ${binary:Version})</emphasis>, ${misc:Depends}
Suggests: ocaml-findlib (>= 1.1)
...
</programlisting>
</example>
</para>
<para>
<filename>libxxx-ocaml-dev</filename> packages should be in <code>Section: ocaml</code>
</para>
<para>
All &ocaml-name; bytecode libraries
(<filename>*.cma</filename>) and bytecode object files
(<filename>*.cmo</filename>) should be compiled for
debugging, i.e. they should be compiled passing the
<option>-g</option> option to <command>ocamlc</command> (or
<command>ocamlc.opt</command>).
</para>
</listitem>
</itemizedlist>
</para>
<para>
Optionally, two other packages may be created:
<itemizedlist>
<listitem>
<para>
<filename>libxxx-ocaml-bin</filename> may include binaries provided
by the library source package if they are numerous. This package
should conform with the same regulations as other packages
providing ocaml programs. It is only needed to split off this
package if there is a significant number of programs included in
the library, if not, the programs should go into
<filename>libxxx-ocaml-dev</filename>. </para>
</listitem>
<listitem>
<para>
<filename>libxxx-ocaml-doc</filename> may include any kind of
documentation provided by the library source package or as separate
documentation. Again, if there is only little documentation, they
should go with the <filename>-dev</filename> package. </para>
</listitem>
</itemizedlist>
</para>
<para>
It is recommended that libraries use the <option>-pack</option> option to
pack all the modules provided by the library into one module. We don't
think upstream libraries will be moving to this scheme anytime soon (unless
we actively lobby for it) so this is just a recommendation for now.
</para>
<para>
It is recommended that each library package ships a
<filename>META</filename> file in order to make the library usable via
<filename>ocamlfind</filename> (see the Debian package
<filename>ocaml-findlib</filename>). See <xref linkend="META" /> for more
information on this.</para>
</section>
<section id="library-path">
<title>Paths for libraries</title>
<para>
Libraries should be installed in <filename>&ocaml-sys-dir;/</filename> or
in a subdirectory of this directory. This includes in particular bytecode
libraries (<filename>*.cma</filename>), native libraries
(<filename>*.cmxa, *.a</filename>), native plugins (<filename>*.cmxs</filename>), bytecode object files
(<filename>*.cmo</filename>), native object files
(<filename>*.cmx, *.o</filename>), static libraries (<filename>*.a</filename>)
and <filename>META</filename> files. The only exception to this rule is
for shared libraries (<filename>dll*.so</filename>) which should be
installed in <filename>&ocaml-sys-dir;/stublibs</filename>, as can it be
seen in the <filename>&ocaml-sys-dir;/ld.conf</filename> file. </para>
<para>
If upstream developers already use a subdirectory of the OCaml standard
library path then this path should be preserved in the Debian package but
made relative to the standard library path of OCaml. Before using the
provided subdirectory, packagers should obviously check if there is no
subdirectory name clash with another OCaml library. </para>
<para>
If upstream developers do not use this scheme then packagers are
encouraged not to install this library in the standard library
directory. They should create at least a subdirectory per source
package (in order to avoid name clashes). Packagers should also
consider to do a larger separation by creating a subdirectory
per binary package (in order to avoid META name clash). A
suggested rule to choose the name for this subdirectory is to use
either the package name provided by the META of the upstream, or
the name of the library itself. </para>
</section>
<section id="META">
<title>Providing <filename>META</filename> files</title>
<para>
The <filename>ocaml-findlib</filename> provides a tool (called
<filename>ocamlfind</filename>) to handle OCaml libraries and store
information about libraries dependencies, compiler flags, linking
options, etc. Meta informations regarding a library are contained in
files (usually one for each library), named <filename>META</filename>
files, contained in the library directory. The distribution of
<filename>META</filename> files is the best way to make more easy to use
the Debian-specific organization of libraries. Packages distributing
<filename>META</filename> files should suggest the use of &ocamlfind;,
that is have a <varname>Suggest: ocaml-findlib</varname>.
</para>
<para>
By default, &ocamlfind; will look for <filename>META</filename> in this order:
<itemizedlist>
<listitem><para><filename>&ocaml-metas-dir;/</filename></para></listitem>
<listitem><para><filename>&ocaml-sys-dir;/package/</filename></para></listitem>
</itemizedlist>
</para>
<para>
If a library package creates its own subdirectory
<filename>&ocaml-sys-dir;/package/</filename> then the META file
should be stored in that directory.
</para>
<para>
The naming scheme of <filename>META</filename> is pretty simple.
<itemizedlist>
<listitem>
<para>
If the <filename>META</filename> file is placed in the subdirectory
of the package then it should be called <filename>META</filename>.
</para>
</listitem>
<listitem>
<para>
If the <filename>META</filename> file is placed in
<filename>&ocaml-metas-dir;/</filename> then it should be called
<filename>META.packagename</filename>, where
<filename>packagename</filename> is the name of the subdirectory
where the library is stored. </para>
</listitem>
</itemizedlist>
</para>
<para>
For example, the <filename>META</filename> file for the lablgtk library
is named <filename>META</filename> and has path
<filename>&ocaml-sys-dir;/lablgtk/META</filename>, where
<filename>&ocaml-sys-dir;</filename> is the main OCaml installation
directory and <filename>lablgtk</filename> is the lablgtk library
directory. </para>
<para>
If upstream doesn't provide a <filename>META</filename> then
packagers are encouraged to create one. In this case, the META
file should contain a comment like this, so that developers will
know that they shouldn't count on the availability of a META file
on non-Debian machines:
<programlisting>
# This META file is delivered by the Debian distribution.
</programlisting>
Furthermore, the <filename>META</filename> file should be sent to the
upstream authors in order to have it included in future versions
of the upstream source. For more information about
<filename>META</filename> files see the <ulink
url="http://www.ocaml-programming.de/packages/documentation/findlib/">Findlib
manual</ulink>, at the several META files provided by other
packages (e.g. <filename>lablgtk</filename>,
<filename>pxp</filename>, <filename>pcre</filename>,
<filename>netstring</filename>, <filename>lablgl</filename>,
...) or ask on the debian-ocaml-maint mailing list for help.
</para>
</section>
<!--
<section id="ocamldoc-base-path">
<title>&ocamldoc; specific generated documentation</title>
<para>
Even if this way of producing documentation is not mandatory, packagers are
encouraged to use it, in order to ship lighter documentation, which could
be processed by &ocaml-name; tools.
</para>
<para>
By default, &ocamldoc-base; will look for <filename>*.odoc</filename> in this order :
<variablelist>
<varlistentry>
<term><varname>local</varname></term>
<listitem><para><filename>/usr/local/share/ocamldoc/&ocaml-version;/</filename></para></listitem>
</varlistentry>
<varlistentry>
<term><varname>core</varname></term>
<listitem><para><filename>/usr/share/ocamldoc/&ocaml-version;/</filename></para></listitem>
</varlistentry>
</variablelist>
</para>
<para>
As for library, the naming scheme of the <filename>*.odoc</filename> should be
at least the name of the source package from which the documentation was
generated. If a source package is split in many binary package and the
documentation comes only in one <filename>*.odoc</filename>, packagers are
encouraged to create a separate package and to <varname>Suggest:</varname> it
in each binary package which he described. If this could not be met, it is at
least a good practice to <varname>Suggest:</varname> the package containing
the documentation.
The packager should consider to ship one <filename>*.odoc</filename> per
library package.
</para>
<para>
By doing this, &ocaml-force; is trying to build a clear way of distributing
documentation. It should help user to find and exploit the documentation
coming from the source. Generating &ocamldoc; documentation is not so hard,
and should take a one line call. Commenting the code in order to generate
fully functional documentation is however an upstream task. Packager are encouraged
to patch <filename>Makefile</filename> in order to have a target
<varname>odoc</varname>, generating this documentation and to contact upstream
author to have a well commented source.
</para>
</section>
-->
<section id="camlp4-path">
<title>&camlp4;/&camlp5;</title>
<para> Actually, &camlp4; extensions should be processed just like standard
OCaml libraries. In particular, they should provide a META file.
The syntax extension should be contained in a <varname>syntax</varname> sub
package.
</para>
<para>
The naming convention of the package is to use the same naming as with
standard package, replacing <varname>-ocaml-</varname> by the syntax
extension name, <varname>-camlp4-</varname>.
</para>
<para>
If a package contains at the same time syntax extension and libraries then it
is up to the maintainer to choose the most relevant name for the package.
Whatever the name chosen for the package, the other name should be a
<varname>Provide</varname> of the package.
</para>
<para>
For example, consider the package <application>sexplib310</application>.
It provides a syntax extension and a library, which is the runtime support
of the additional function generated by the syntax extension. Since the most
common use of <application>sexplib310</application> is through its syntax
extension, the package is name
<application>libsexplib-camlp4-dev</application> and it also provide
<application>libsexplib-ocaml-dev</application>.
</para>
<para>
&camlp5; is an alternate pretty-printer and preprocessor for OCaml
(which is compatible with pre-3.10.0 version). Syntax extension are
handled through exactly the same scheme as for &camlp4; except that
package name use <varname>-camlp5-</varname> rather than
<varname>-camlp4-</varname>.
</para>
</section>
<section id="documentation">
<title>Documentation</title>
<para>
The documentation is a joint effort of &ocaml-force; and upstream.
There are many ways to have documentation:
<itemizedlist>
<listitem><para>header files (<filename>*.mli</filename>),</para></listitem>
<listitem><para>source files (<filename>*.ml</filename>),</para></listitem>
<listitem><para>specific documentation provided by the upstream,</para></listitem>
<listitem><para>OCamldoc generated documentation.</para></listitem>
</itemizedlist>
</para>
<para>
This documentation should be browsable by different means, from the most
simple to the most complex one. At least, they should all be readable with
a simple text editor. Specific and &ocamldoc; generated documentations
should be provided in HTML format.
</para>
<para>
You can generate &ocamldoc;-specific documentation by using
the <option>-dump</option> option of this command. By using this, you dump the
intermediate representation of the document that will be generated by ocamldoc.
This can be used to generate HTML documentation and manpages, by reloading this
file (using <option>-load</option>).
</para>
</section>
</chapter>
|