1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283
|
Network Working Group G. Malkin
Request for Comments: 1783 Xylogics, Inc.
Updates: 1350 A. Harkin
Category: Standards Track Hewlett Packard Co.
March 1995
TFTP Blocksize Option
Status of this Memo
This document specifies an Internet standards track protocol for the
Internet community, and requests discussion and suggestions for
improvements. Please refer to the current edition of the "Internet
Official Protocol Standards" (STD 1) for the standardization state
and status of this protocol. Distribution of this memo is unlimited.
Abstract
The Trivial File Transfer Protocol [1] is a simple, lock-step, file
transfer protocol which allows a client to get or put a file onto a
remote host. One of its primary uses is the booting of diskless
nodes on a Local Area Network. TFTP is used because it is very
simple to implement in a small node's limited ROM space. However,
the choice of a 512-byte blocksize is not the most efficient for use
on a LAN whose MTU may 1500 bytes or greater.
This document describes a TFTP option which allows the client and
server to negotiate a blocksize more applicable to the network
medium. The TFTP Option Extension mechanism is described in [2].
Blocksize Option Specification
The TFTP Read Request or Write Request packet is modified to include
the blocksize option as follows:
+-------+---~~---+---+---~~---+---+---~~---+---+---~~---+---+
| opc |filename| 0 | mode | 0 | blksize| 0 | #octets| 0 |
+-------+---~~---+---+---~~---+---+---~~---+---+---~~---+---+
opc
The opcode field contains either a 1, for Read Requests, or 2,
for Write Requests, as defined in [1].
filename
The name of the file to be read or written, as defined in [1].
This is a NULL-terminated field.
Malkin & Harkin [Page 1]
RFC 1783 TFTP Blocksize Option March 1995
mode
The mode of the file transfer: "netascii", "octet", or "mail",
as defined in [1]. This is a NULL-terminated field.
blksize
The Blocksize option, "blksize" (case insensitive). This is a
NULL-terminated field.
#octets
The number of octets in a block, specified in ASCII. Valid
values range between "8" and "65464" octets, inclusive. This
is a NULL-terminated field.
For example:
+-------+--------+---+--------+---+--------+---+--------+---+
| 1 | foobar | 0 | binary | 0 | blksize| 0 | 1432 | 0 |
+-------+--------+---+--------+---+--------+---+--------+---+
is a Read Request, for the file named "foobar", in binary transfer
mode, with a block size of 1432 bytes (Ethernet MTU, less the UDP and
IP header lengths).
If the server is willing to accept the blocksize option, it sends an
Option Acknowledgment (OACK) to the client. The specified value must
be less than or equal to the value specified by the client. The
client must then either use the size specified in the OACK, or send
an ERROR packet, with error code 8, to terminate the transfer.
The rules for determining the final packet are unchanged from [1].
The reception of a data packet with a data length less than the
negotiated blocksize is the final packet. If the blocksize is
greater than the size of the packet, the first packet is the final
packet. If amount of data to be transfered is an integral multiple
of the blocksize, an extra data packet containing no data is sent to
end the transfer.
Malkin & Harkin [Page 2]
RFC 1783 TFTP Blocksize Option March 1995
Proof of Concept
Performance tests were run on the prototype implementation using a
variety of block sizes. The tests were run on a lightly loaded
Ethernet, between two HP-UX 9000, in "octet" mode, on 2.25MB files.
The average (5x) transfer times for paths with (g-time) and without
(n-time) a intermediate gateway are graphed as follows:
|
37 + g
|
35 +
|
33 +
|
31 +
|
29 +
|
27 +
| g blocksize n-time g-time
25 + --------- ------ ------
s | n 512 23.85 37.05
e 23 + g 1024 16.15 25.65
c | 1432 13.70 23.10
o 21 + 2048 10.90 16.90
n | 4096 6.85 9.65
d 19 + 8192 4.90 6.15
s |
17 + g
| n
15 +
| n
13 +
|
11 + n
| g
9 +
|
7 + n
| g
5 + n
"
0 +------+------+--+---+------+------+---
512 1K | 2K 4K 8K
1432
blocksize (bytes)
Malkin & Harkin [Page 3]
RFC 1783 TFTP Blocksize Option March 1995
The comparisons between transfer times (without a gateway) between
the standard 512-byte blocksize and the negotiated blocksizes are:
1024 2x -32%
1432 2.8x -42%
2048 4x -54%
4096 8x -71%
8192 16x -80%
As was anticipated, the transfer time decreases with an increase in
blocksize. The reason for the reduction in time is the reduction in
the number of packets sent. For example, by increasing the blocksize
from 512 bytes to 1024 bytes, not only are the number of data packets
halved, but the number of acknowledgement packets is also halved
(along with the number of times the data transmitter must wait for an
ACK). A secondary effect is the efficiency gained by reducing the
per-packet framing and processing overhead.
Of course, if the blocksize exceeds the path MTU, IP fragmentation
and reassembly will begin to add more overhead. This will be more
noticable the greater the number of gateways in the path.
Security Considerations
Security issues are not discussed in this memo.
References
[1] Sollins, K., "The TFTP Protocol (Revision 2)", STD 33, RFC 1350,
MIT, July 1992.
[2] Malkin, G., and A. Harkin, "TFTP Option Extension", RFC 1782,
Xylogics, Inc., Hewlett Packard Co., March 1995.
Malkin & Harkin [Page 4]
RFC 1783 TFTP Blocksize Option March 1995
Authors' Addresses
Gary Scott Malkin
Xylogics, Inc.
53 Third Avenue
Burlington, MA 01803
Phone: (617) 272-8140
EMail: gmalkin@xylogics.com
Art Harkin
Internet Services Project
Information Networks Division
19420 Homestead Road MS 43LN
Cupertino, CA 95014
Phone: (408) 447-3755
EMail: ash@cup.hp.com
Malkin & Harkin [Page 5]
|