File: rfc1059.txt

package info (click to toggle)
doc-rfc 20181229-2
  • links: PTS, VCS
  • area: non-free
  • in suites: buster
  • size: 570,944 kB
  • sloc: xml: 285,646; sh: 107; python: 90; perl: 42; makefile: 14
file content (3245 lines) | stat: -rw-r--r-- 137,645 bytes parent folder | download | duplicates (5)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
543
544
545
546
547
548
549
550
551
552
553
554
555
556
557
558
559
560
561
562
563
564
565
566
567
568
569
570
571
572
573
574
575
576
577
578
579
580
581
582
583
584
585
586
587
588
589
590
591
592
593
594
595
596
597
598
599
600
601
602
603
604
605
606
607
608
609
610
611
612
613
614
615
616
617
618
619
620
621
622
623
624
625
626
627
628
629
630
631
632
633
634
635
636
637
638
639
640
641
642
643
644
645
646
647
648
649
650
651
652
653
654
655
656
657
658
659
660
661
662
663
664
665
666
667
668
669
670
671
672
673
674
675
676
677
678
679
680
681
682
683
684
685
686
687
688
689
690
691
692
693
694
695
696
697
698
699
700
701
702
703
704
705
706
707
708
709
710
711
712
713
714
715
716
717
718
719
720
721
722
723
724
725
726
727
728
729
730
731
732
733
734
735
736
737
738
739
740
741
742
743
744
745
746
747
748
749
750
751
752
753
754
755
756
757
758
759
760
761
762
763
764
765
766
767
768
769
770
771
772
773
774
775
776
777
778
779
780
781
782
783
784
785
786
787
788
789
790
791
792
793
794
795
796
797
798
799
800
801
802
803
804
805
806
807
808
809
810
811
812
813
814
815
816
817
818
819
820
821
822
823
824
825
826
827
828
829
830
831
832
833
834
835
836
837
838
839
840
841
842
843
844
845
846
847
848
849
850
851
852
853
854
855
856
857
858
859
860
861
862
863
864
865
866
867
868
869
870
871
872
873
874
875
876
877
878
879
880
881
882
883
884
885
886
887
888
889
890
891
892
893
894
895
896
897
898
899
900
901
902
903
904
905
906
907
908
909
910
911
912
913
914
915
916
917
918
919
920
921
922
923
924
925
926
927
928
929
930
931
932
933
934
935
936
937
938
939
940
941
942
943
944
945
946
947
948
949
950
951
952
953
954
955
956
957
958
959
960
961
962
963
964
965
966
967
968
969
970
971
972
973
974
975
976
977
978
979
980
981
982
983
984
985
986
987
988
989
990
991
992
993
994
995
996
997
998
999
1000
1001
1002
1003
1004
1005
1006
1007
1008
1009
1010
1011
1012
1013
1014
1015
1016
1017
1018
1019
1020
1021
1022
1023
1024
1025
1026
1027
1028
1029
1030
1031
1032
1033
1034
1035
1036
1037
1038
1039
1040
1041
1042
1043
1044
1045
1046
1047
1048
1049
1050
1051
1052
1053
1054
1055
1056
1057
1058
1059
1060
1061
1062
1063
1064
1065
1066
1067
1068
1069
1070
1071
1072
1073
1074
1075
1076
1077
1078
1079
1080
1081
1082
1083
1084
1085
1086
1087
1088
1089
1090
1091
1092
1093
1094
1095
1096
1097
1098
1099
1100
1101
1102
1103
1104
1105
1106
1107
1108
1109
1110
1111
1112
1113
1114
1115
1116
1117
1118
1119
1120
1121
1122
1123
1124
1125
1126
1127
1128
1129
1130
1131
1132
1133
1134
1135
1136
1137
1138
1139
1140
1141
1142
1143
1144
1145
1146
1147
1148
1149
1150
1151
1152
1153
1154
1155
1156
1157
1158
1159
1160
1161
1162
1163
1164
1165
1166
1167
1168
1169
1170
1171
1172
1173
1174
1175
1176
1177
1178
1179
1180
1181
1182
1183
1184
1185
1186
1187
1188
1189
1190
1191
1192
1193
1194
1195
1196
1197
1198
1199
1200
1201
1202
1203
1204
1205
1206
1207
1208
1209
1210
1211
1212
1213
1214
1215
1216
1217
1218
1219
1220
1221
1222
1223
1224
1225
1226
1227
1228
1229
1230
1231
1232
1233
1234
1235
1236
1237
1238
1239
1240
1241
1242
1243
1244
1245
1246
1247
1248
1249
1250
1251
1252
1253
1254
1255
1256
1257
1258
1259
1260
1261
1262
1263
1264
1265
1266
1267
1268
1269
1270
1271
1272
1273
1274
1275
1276
1277
1278
1279
1280
1281
1282
1283
1284
1285
1286
1287
1288
1289
1290
1291
1292
1293
1294
1295
1296
1297
1298
1299
1300
1301
1302
1303
1304
1305
1306
1307
1308
1309
1310
1311
1312
1313
1314
1315
1316
1317
1318
1319
1320
1321
1322
1323
1324
1325
1326
1327
1328
1329
1330
1331
1332
1333
1334
1335
1336
1337
1338
1339
1340
1341
1342
1343
1344
1345
1346
1347
1348
1349
1350
1351
1352
1353
1354
1355
1356
1357
1358
1359
1360
1361
1362
1363
1364
1365
1366
1367
1368
1369
1370
1371
1372
1373
1374
1375
1376
1377
1378
1379
1380
1381
1382
1383
1384
1385
1386
1387
1388
1389
1390
1391
1392
1393
1394
1395
1396
1397
1398
1399
1400
1401
1402
1403
1404
1405
1406
1407
1408
1409
1410
1411
1412
1413
1414
1415
1416
1417
1418
1419
1420
1421
1422
1423
1424
1425
1426
1427
1428
1429
1430
1431
1432
1433
1434
1435
1436
1437
1438
1439
1440
1441
1442
1443
1444
1445
1446
1447
1448
1449
1450
1451
1452
1453
1454
1455
1456
1457
1458
1459
1460
1461
1462
1463
1464
1465
1466
1467
1468
1469
1470
1471
1472
1473
1474
1475
1476
1477
1478
1479
1480
1481
1482
1483
1484
1485
1486
1487
1488
1489
1490
1491
1492
1493
1494
1495
1496
1497
1498
1499
1500
1501
1502
1503
1504
1505
1506
1507
1508
1509
1510
1511
1512
1513
1514
1515
1516
1517
1518
1519
1520
1521
1522
1523
1524
1525
1526
1527
1528
1529
1530
1531
1532
1533
1534
1535
1536
1537
1538
1539
1540
1541
1542
1543
1544
1545
1546
1547
1548
1549
1550
1551
1552
1553
1554
1555
1556
1557
1558
1559
1560
1561
1562
1563
1564
1565
1566
1567
1568
1569
1570
1571
1572
1573
1574
1575
1576
1577
1578
1579
1580
1581
1582
1583
1584
1585
1586
1587
1588
1589
1590
1591
1592
1593
1594
1595
1596
1597
1598
1599
1600
1601
1602
1603
1604
1605
1606
1607
1608
1609
1610
1611
1612
1613
1614
1615
1616
1617
1618
1619
1620
1621
1622
1623
1624
1625
1626
1627
1628
1629
1630
1631
1632
1633
1634
1635
1636
1637
1638
1639
1640
1641
1642
1643
1644
1645
1646
1647
1648
1649
1650
1651
1652
1653
1654
1655
1656
1657
1658
1659
1660
1661
1662
1663
1664
1665
1666
1667
1668
1669
1670
1671
1672
1673
1674
1675
1676
1677
1678
1679
1680
1681
1682
1683
1684
1685
1686
1687
1688
1689
1690
1691
1692
1693
1694
1695
1696
1697
1698
1699
1700
1701
1702
1703
1704
1705
1706
1707
1708
1709
1710
1711
1712
1713
1714
1715
1716
1717
1718
1719
1720
1721
1722
1723
1724
1725
1726
1727
1728
1729
1730
1731
1732
1733
1734
1735
1736
1737
1738
1739
1740
1741
1742
1743
1744
1745
1746
1747
1748
1749
1750
1751
1752
1753
1754
1755
1756
1757
1758
1759
1760
1761
1762
1763
1764
1765
1766
1767
1768
1769
1770
1771
1772
1773
1774
1775
1776
1777
1778
1779
1780
1781
1782
1783
1784
1785
1786
1787
1788
1789
1790
1791
1792
1793
1794
1795
1796
1797
1798
1799
1800
1801
1802
1803
1804
1805
1806
1807
1808
1809
1810
1811
1812
1813
1814
1815
1816
1817
1818
1819
1820
1821
1822
1823
1824
1825
1826
1827
1828
1829
1830
1831
1832
1833
1834
1835
1836
1837
1838
1839
1840
1841
1842
1843
1844
1845
1846
1847
1848
1849
1850
1851
1852
1853
1854
1855
1856
1857
1858
1859
1860
1861
1862
1863
1864
1865
1866
1867
1868
1869
1870
1871
1872
1873
1874
1875
1876
1877
1878
1879
1880
1881
1882
1883
1884
1885
1886
1887
1888
1889
1890
1891
1892
1893
1894
1895
1896
1897
1898
1899
1900
1901
1902
1903
1904
1905
1906
1907
1908
1909
1910
1911
1912
1913
1914
1915
1916
1917
1918
1919
1920
1921
1922
1923
1924
1925
1926
1927
1928
1929
1930
1931
1932
1933
1934
1935
1936
1937
1938
1939
1940
1941
1942
1943
1944
1945
1946
1947
1948
1949
1950
1951
1952
1953
1954
1955
1956
1957
1958
1959
1960
1961
1962
1963
1964
1965
1966
1967
1968
1969
1970
1971
1972
1973
1974
1975
1976
1977
1978
1979
1980
1981
1982
1983
1984
1985
1986
1987
1988
1989
1990
1991
1992
1993
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
2026
2027
2028
2029
2030
2031
2032
2033
2034
2035
2036
2037
2038
2039
2040
2041
2042
2043
2044
2045
2046
2047
2048
2049
2050
2051
2052
2053
2054
2055
2056
2057
2058
2059
2060
2061
2062
2063
2064
2065
2066
2067
2068
2069
2070
2071
2072
2073
2074
2075
2076
2077
2078
2079
2080
2081
2082
2083
2084
2085
2086
2087
2088
2089
2090
2091
2092
2093
2094
2095
2096
2097
2098
2099
2100
2101
2102
2103
2104
2105
2106
2107
2108
2109
2110
2111
2112
2113
2114
2115
2116
2117
2118
2119
2120
2121
2122
2123
2124
2125
2126
2127
2128
2129
2130
2131
2132
2133
2134
2135
2136
2137
2138
2139
2140
2141
2142
2143
2144
2145
2146
2147
2148
2149
2150
2151
2152
2153
2154
2155
2156
2157
2158
2159
2160
2161
2162
2163
2164
2165
2166
2167
2168
2169
2170
2171
2172
2173
2174
2175
2176
2177
2178
2179
2180
2181
2182
2183
2184
2185
2186
2187
2188
2189
2190
2191
2192
2193
2194
2195
2196
2197
2198
2199
2200
2201
2202
2203
2204
2205
2206
2207
2208
2209
2210
2211
2212
2213
2214
2215
2216
2217
2218
2219
2220
2221
2222
2223
2224
2225
2226
2227
2228
2229
2230
2231
2232
2233
2234
2235
2236
2237
2238
2239
2240
2241
2242
2243
2244
2245
2246
2247
2248
2249
2250
2251
2252
2253
2254
2255
2256
2257
2258
2259
2260
2261
2262
2263
2264
2265
2266
2267
2268
2269
2270
2271
2272
2273
2274
2275
2276
2277
2278
2279
2280
2281
2282
2283
2284
2285
2286
2287
2288
2289
2290
2291
2292
2293
2294
2295
2296
2297
2298
2299
2300
2301
2302
2303
2304
2305
2306
2307
2308
2309
2310
2311
2312
2313
2314
2315
2316
2317
2318
2319
2320
2321
2322
2323
2324
2325
2326
2327
2328
2329
2330
2331
2332
2333
2334
2335
2336
2337
2338
2339
2340
2341
2342
2343
2344
2345
2346
2347
2348
2349
2350
2351
2352
2353
2354
2355
2356
2357
2358
2359
2360
2361
2362
2363
2364
2365
2366
2367
2368
2369
2370
2371
2372
2373
2374
2375
2376
2377
2378
2379
2380
2381
2382
2383
2384
2385
2386
2387
2388
2389
2390
2391
2392
2393
2394
2395
2396
2397
2398
2399
2400
2401
2402
2403
2404
2405
2406
2407
2408
2409
2410
2411
2412
2413
2414
2415
2416
2417
2418
2419
2420
2421
2422
2423
2424
2425
2426
2427
2428
2429
2430
2431
2432
2433
2434
2435
2436
2437
2438
2439
2440
2441
2442
2443
2444
2445
2446
2447
2448
2449
2450
2451
2452
2453
2454
2455
2456
2457
2458
2459
2460
2461
2462
2463
2464
2465
2466
2467
2468
2469
2470
2471
2472
2473
2474
2475
2476
2477
2478
2479
2480
2481
2482
2483
2484
2485
2486
2487
2488
2489
2490
2491
2492
2493
2494
2495
2496
2497
2498
2499
2500
2501
2502
2503
2504
2505
2506
2507
2508
2509
2510
2511
2512
2513
2514
2515
2516
2517
2518
2519
2520
2521
2522
2523
2524
2525
2526
2527
2528
2529
2530
2531
2532
2533
2534
2535
2536
2537
2538
2539
2540
2541
2542
2543
2544
2545
2546
2547
2548
2549
2550
2551
2552
2553
2554
2555
2556
2557
2558
2559
2560
2561
2562
2563
2564
2565
2566
2567
2568
2569
2570
2571
2572
2573
2574
2575
2576
2577
2578
2579
2580
2581
2582
2583
2584
2585
2586
2587
2588
2589
2590
2591
2592
2593
2594
2595
2596
2597
2598
2599
2600
2601
2602
2603
2604
2605
2606
2607
2608
2609
2610
2611
2612
2613
2614
2615
2616
2617
2618
2619
2620
2621
2622
2623
2624
2625
2626
2627
2628
2629
2630
2631
2632
2633
2634
2635
2636
2637
2638
2639
2640
2641
2642
2643
2644
2645
2646
2647
2648
2649
2650
2651
2652
2653
2654
2655
2656
2657
2658
2659
2660
2661
2662
2663
2664
2665
2666
2667
2668
2669
2670
2671
2672
2673
2674
2675
2676
2677
2678
2679
2680
2681
2682
2683
2684
2685
2686
2687
2688
2689
2690
2691
2692
2693
2694
2695
2696
2697
2698
2699
2700
2701
2702
2703
2704
2705
2706
2707
2708
2709
2710
2711
2712
2713
2714
2715
2716
2717
2718
2719
2720
2721
2722
2723
2724
2725
2726
2727
2728
2729
2730
2731
2732
2733
2734
2735
2736
2737
2738
2739
2740
2741
2742
2743
2744
2745
2746
2747
2748
2749
2750
2751
2752
2753
2754
2755
2756
2757
2758
2759
2760
2761
2762
2763
2764
2765
2766
2767
2768
2769
2770
2771
2772
2773
2774
2775
2776
2777
2778
2779
2780
2781
2782
2783
2784
2785
2786
2787
2788
2789
2790
2791
2792
2793
2794
2795
2796
2797
2798
2799
2800
2801
2802
2803
2804
2805
2806
2807
2808
2809
2810
2811
2812
2813
2814
2815
2816
2817
2818
2819
2820
2821
2822
2823
2824
2825
2826
2827
2828
2829
2830
2831
2832
2833
2834
2835
2836
2837
2838
2839
2840
2841
2842
2843
2844
2845
2846
2847
2848
2849
2850
2851
2852
2853
2854
2855
2856
2857
2858
2859
2860
2861
2862
2863
2864
2865
2866
2867
2868
2869
2870
2871
2872
2873
2874
2875
2876
2877
2878
2879
2880
2881
2882
2883
2884
2885
2886
2887
2888
2889
2890
2891
2892
2893
2894
2895
2896
2897
2898
2899
2900
2901
2902
2903
2904
2905
2906
2907
2908
2909
2910
2911
2912
2913
2914
2915
2916
2917
2918
2919
2920
2921
2922
2923
2924
2925
2926
2927
2928
2929
2930
2931
2932
2933
2934
2935
2936
2937
2938
2939
2940
2941
2942
2943
2944
2945
2946
2947
2948
2949
2950
2951
2952
2953
2954
2955
2956
2957
2958
2959
2960
2961
2962
2963
2964
2965
2966
2967
2968
2969
2970
2971
2972
2973
2974
2975
2976
2977
2978
2979
2980
2981
2982
2983
2984
2985
2986
2987
2988
2989
2990
2991
2992
2993
2994
2995
2996
2997
2998
2999
3000
3001
3002
3003
3004
3005
3006
3007
3008
3009
3010
3011
3012
3013
3014
3015
3016
3017
3018
3019
3020
3021
3022
3023
3024
3025
3026
3027
3028
3029
3030
3031
3032
3033
3034
3035
3036
3037
3038
3039
3040
3041
3042
3043
3044
3045
3046
3047
3048
3049
3050
3051
3052
3053
3054
3055
3056
3057
3058
3059
3060
3061
3062
3063
3064
3065
3066
3067
3068
3069
3070
3071
3072
3073
3074
3075
3076
3077
3078
3079
3080
3081
3082
3083
3084
3085
3086
3087
3088
3089
3090
3091
3092
3093
3094
3095
3096
3097
3098
3099
3100
3101
3102
3103
3104
3105
3106
3107
3108
3109
3110
3111
3112
3113
3114
3115
3116
3117
3118
3119
3120
3121
3122
3123
3124
3125
3126
3127
3128
3129
3130
3131
3132
3133
3134
3135
3136
3137
3138
3139
3140
3141
3142
3143
3144
3145
3146
3147
3148
3149
3150
3151
3152
3153
3154
3155
3156
3157
3158
3159
3160
3161
3162
3163
3164
3165
3166
3167
3168
3169
3170
3171
3172
3173
3174
3175
3176
3177
3178
3179
3180
3181
3182
3183
3184
3185
3186
3187
3188
3189
3190
3191
3192
3193
3194
3195
3196
3197
3198
3199
3200
3201
3202
3203
3204
3205
3206
3207
3208
3209
3210
3211
3212
3213
3214
3215
3216
3217
3218
3219
3220
3221
3222
3223
3224
3225
3226
3227
3228
3229
3230
3231
3232
3233
3234
3235
3236
3237
3238
3239
3240
3241
3242
3243
3244
3245
Network Working Group                                        D. Mills
Request for Comments:  1059                    University of Delaware
                                                            July 1988

                   Network Time Protocol (Version 1)
                    Specification and Implementation

Status of this Memo

   This memo describes the Network Time Protocol (NTP), specifies its
   formal structure and summarizes information useful for its
   implementation.  NTP provides the mechanisms to synchronize time and
   coordinate time distribution in a large, diverse internet operating
   at rates from mundane to lightwave.  It uses a returnable-time design
   in which a distributed subnet of time servers operating in a self-
   organizing, hierarchical master-slave configuration synchronizes
   logical clocks within the subnet and to national time standards via
   wire or radio.  The servers can also redistribute reference time via
   local routing algorithms and time daemons.

   The NTP architectures, algorithms and protocols which have evolved
   over several years of implementation and refinement are described in
   this document.  The prototype system, which has been in regular
   operation in the Internet for the last two years, is described in an
   Appendix along with performance data which shows that timekeeping
   accuracy throughout most portions of the Internet can be ordinarily
   maintained to within a few tens of milliseconds, even in cases of
   failure or disruption of clocks, time servers or nets.  This is a
   Draft Standard for an Elective protocol.  Distribution of this memo
   is unlimited.

                             Table of Contents

   1.      Introduction                                               3
   1.1.    Related Technology                                         4
   2.      System Architecture                                        6
   2.1.    Implementation Model                                       7
   2.2.    Network Configurations                                     9
   2.3.    Time Scales                                               10
   3.      Network Time Protocol                                     12
   3.1.    Data Formats                                              12
   3.2.    State Variables and Parameters                            13
   3.2.1.  Common Variables                                          15
   3.2.2.  System Variables                                          17
   3.2.3.  Peer Variables                                            18
   3.2.4.  Packet Variables                                          19
   3.2.5.  Clock Filter Variables                                    19
   3.2.6.  Parameters                                                20



Mills                                                           [Page 1]

RFC 1059                 Network Time Protocol                 July 1988


   3.3.    Modes of Operation                                        21
   3.4.    Event Processing                                          22
   3.4.1.  Timeout Procedure                                         23
   3.4.2.  Receive Procedure                                         24
   3.4.3.  Update Procedure                                          27
   3.4.4.  Initialization Procedures                                 29
   4.      Filtering and Selection Algorithms                        29
   4.1.    Clock Filter Algorithm                                    29
   4.2     Clock Selection Algorithm                                 30
   4.3.    Variable-Rate Polling                                     32
   5.      Logical Clocks                                            33
   5.1.    Uniform Phase Adjustments                                 35
   5.2.    Nonuniform Phase Adjustments                              36
   5.3.    Maintaining Date and Time                                 37
   5.4.    Calculating Estimates                                     37
   6.      References                                                40

   Appendices
   Appendix A. UDP Header Format                                     43
   Appendix B. NTP Data Format                                       44
   Appendix C. Timeteller Experiments                                47
   Appendix D. Evaluation of Filtering Algorithms                    49
   Appendix E. NTP Synchronization Networks                          56

   List of Figures
   Figure 2.1. Implementation Model                                   8
   Figure 3.1. Calculating Delay and Offset                          26
   Figure 5.1. Clock Registers                                       34
   Figure D.1. Calculating Delay and Offset                          50
   Figure E.1. Primary Service Network                               57

   List of Tables
   Table 2.1. Dates of Leap-Second Insertion                         11
   Table 3.1. System Variables                                       14
   Table 3.2. Peer Variables                                         14
   Table 3.3. Packet Variables                                       15
   Table 3.4. Parameters                                             15
   Table 4.1. Outlyer Selection Procedure                            32
   Table 5.1. Clock Parameters                                       35
   Table C.1. Distribution Functions                                 47
   Table D.1. Delay and Offset Measurements (UMD)                    52
   Table D.2.a Delay and Offset Measurements (UDEL)                  52
   Table D.2.b Offset Measurements (UDEL)                            53
   Table D.3. Minimum Filter (UMD - NCAR)                            54
   Table D.4. Median Filter (UMD - NCAR)                             54
   Table D.5. Minimum Filter (UDEL - NCAR)                           55
   Table E.1. Primary Servers                                        56




Mills                                                           [Page 2]

RFC 1059                 Network Time Protocol                 July 1988


1.  Introduction

   This document describes the Network Time Protocol (NTP), including
   the architectures, algorithms and protocols to synchronize local
   clocks in a set of distributed clients and servers.  The protocol was
   first described in RFC-958 [24], but has evolved in significant ways
   since publication of that document.  NTP is built on the Internet
   Protocol (IP) [10] and User Datagram Protocol (UDP) [6], which
   provide a connectionless transport mechanism;  however, it is readily
   adaptable to other protocol suites.  It is evolved from the Time
   Protocol [13] and the ICMP Timestamp message [11], but is
   specifically designed to maintain accuracy and robustness, even when
   used over typical Internet paths involving multiple gateways and
   unreliable nets.

   The service environment consists of the implementation model, service
   model and time scale described in Section 2.  The implementation
   model is based on a multiple-process operating system architecture,
   although other architectures could be used as well.  The service
   model is based on a returnable-time design which depends only on
   measured offsets, or skews, but does not require reliable message
   delivery.  The subnet is a self-organizing, hierarchical master-slave
   configuration, with synchronization paths determined by a minimum-
   weight spanning tree.  While multiple masters (primary servers) may
   exist, there is no requirement for an election protocol.

   NTP itself is described in Section 3.  It provides the protocol
   mechanisms to synchronize time in principle to precisions in the
   order of nanoseconds while preserving a non-ambiguous date well into
   the next century.  The protocol includes provisions to specify the
   characteristics and estimate the error of the local clock and the
   time server to which it may be synchronized.  It also includes
   provisions for operation with a number of mutually suspicious,
   hierarchically distributed primary reference sources such as radio
   clocks.

   Section 4 describes algorithms useful for deglitching and smoothing
   clock-offset samples collected on a continuous basis.  These
   algorithms began with those suggested in [22], were refined as the
   results of experiments described in [23] and further evolved under
   typical operating conditions over the last two years.  In addition,
   as the result of experience in operating multiple-server nets
   including radio-synchronized clocks at several sites in the US and
   with clients in the US and Europe, reliable algorithms for selecting
   good clocks from a population possibly including broken ones have
   been developed and are described in Section 4.

   The accuracies achievable by NTP depend strongly on the precision of



Mills                                                           [Page 3]

RFC 1059                 Network Time Protocol                 July 1988


   the local clock hardware and stringent control of device and process
   latencies.  Provisions must be included to adjust the software
   logical clock time and frequency in response to corrections produced
   by NTP.  Section 5 describes a logical clock design evolved from the
   Fuzzball implementation described in [15].  This design includes
   offset-slewing, drift-compensation and deglitching mechanisms capable
   of accuracies in order of a millisecond, even after extended periods
   when synchronization to primary reference sources has been lost.

   The UDP and NTP packet formats are shown in Appendices A and B.
   Appendix C presents the results of a survey of about 5500 Internet
   hosts showing how their clocks compare with primary reference sources
   using three different time protocols, including NTP.  Appendix D
   presents experimental results using several different deglitching and
   smoothing algorithms.  Appendix E describes the prototype NTP primary
   service net, as well as proposed rules of engagement for its use.

1.1.  Related Technology

   Other mechanisms have been specified in the Internet protocol suite
   to record and transmit the time at which an event takes place,
   including the Daytime protocol [12], Time Protocol [13], ICMP
   Timestamp message [11] and IP Timestamp option [9].  Experimental
   results on measured times and roundtrip delays in the Internet are
   discussed in [14], [23] and [31].  Other synchronization protocols
   are discussed in [7], [17], [20] and [28].  NTP uses techniques
   evolved from both linear and nonlinear synchronization methodology.
   Linear methods used for digital telephone network synchronization are
   summarized in [3], while nonlinear methods used for process
   synchronization are summarized in [27].

   The Fuzzball routing protocol [15], sometimes called Hellospeak,
   incorporates time synchronization directly into the routing protocol
   design.  One or more processes synchronize to an external reference
   source, such as a radio clock or NTP daemon, and the routing
   algorithm constructs a minimum-weight spanning tree rooted on these
   processes.  The clock offsets are then distributed along the arcs of
   the spanning tree to all processes in the system and the various
   process clocks corrected using the procedure described in Section 5
   of this document.  While it can be seen that the design of Hellospeak
   strongly influenced the design of NTP, Hellospeak itself is not an
   Internet protocol and is unsuited for use outside its local-net
   environment.

   The Unix 4.3bsd model [20] uses a single master time daemon to
   measure offsets of a number of slave hosts and send periodic
   corrections to them.  In this model the master is determined using an
   election algorithm [25] designed to avoid situations where either no



Mills                                                           [Page 4]

RFC 1059                 Network Time Protocol                 July 1988


   master is elected or more than one master is elected.  The election
   process requires a broadcast capability, which is not a ubiquitous
   feature of the Internet.  While this model has been extended to
   support hierarchical configurations in which a slave on one network
   serves as a master on the other [28], the model requires handcrafted
   configuration tables in order to establish the hierarchy and avoid
   loops.  In addition to the burdensome, but presumably infrequent,
   overheads of the election process, the offset measurement/correction
   process requires twice as many messages as NTP per update.

   A good deal of research has gone into the issue of maintaining
   accurate time in a community where some clocks cannot be trusted.  A
   truechimer is a clock that maintains timekeeping accuracy to a
   previously published (and trusted) standard, while a falseticker is a
   clock that does not.  Determining whether a particular clock is a
   truechimer or falseticker is an interesting abstract problem which
   can be attacked using methods summarized in [19] and [27].

   A convergence function operates upon the offsets between the clocks
   in a system to increase the accuracy by reducing or eliminating
   errors caused by falsetickers.  There are two classes of convergence
   functions, those involving interactive convergence algorithms and
   those involving interactive consistency algorithms.  Interactive
   convergence algorithms use statistical clustering techniques such as
   the fault-tolerant average algorithm of [17], the CNV algorithm of
   [19], the majority-subset algorithm of [22], the egocentric algorithm
   of [27] and the algorithms in Section 4 of this document.

   Interactive consistency algorithms are designed to detect faulty
   clock processes which might indicate grossly inconsistent offsets in
   successive readings or to different readers.  These algorithms use an
   agreement protocol involving successive rounds of readings, possibly
   relayed and possibly augmented by digital signatures.  Examples
   include the fireworks algorithm of [17] and the optimum algorithm of
   [30].  However, these algorithms require large numbers of messages,
   especially when large numbers of clocks are involved, and are
   designed to detect faults that have rarely been found in the Internet
   experience.  For these reasons they are not considered further in
   this document.

   In practice it is not possible to determine the truechimers from the
   falsetickers on other than a statistical basis, especially with
   hierarchical configurations and a statistically noisy Internet.
   Thus, the approach taken in this document and its predecessors
   involves mutually coupled oscillators and maximum-likelihood
   estimation and selection procedures.  From the analytical point of
   view, the system of distributed NTP peers operates as a set of
   coupled phase-locked oscillators, with the update algorithm



Mills                                                           [Page 5]

RFC 1059                 Network Time Protocol                 July 1988


   functioning as a phase detector and the logical clock as a voltage-
   controlled oscillator.  This similarity is not accidental, since
   systems like this have been studied extensively [3], [4] and [5].

   The particular choice of offset measurement and computation procedure
   described in Section 3 is a variant of the returnable-time system
   used in some digital telephone networks [3].  The clock filter and
   selection algorithms are designed so that the clock synchronization
   subnet self-organizes into a hierarchical master-slave configuration
   [5].  What makes the NTP model unique is the adaptive configuration,
   polling, filtering and selection functions which tailor the dynamics
   of the system to fit the ubiquitous Internet environment.

2.  System Architecture

   The purpose of NTP is to connect a number of primary reference
   sources, synchronized to national standards by wire or radio, to
   widely accessible resources such as backbone gateways.  These
   gateways, acting as primary time servers, use NTP between them to
   cross-check the clocks and mitigate errors due to equipment or
   propagation failures.  Some number of local-net hosts or gateways,
   acting as secondary time servers, run NTP with one or more of the
   primary servers.  In order to reduce the protocol overhead the
   secondary servers distribute time via NTP to the remaining local-net
   hosts.  In the interest of reliability, selected hosts can be
   equipped with less accurate but less expensive radio clocks and used
   for backup in case of failure of the primary and/or secondary servers
   or communication paths between them.

   There is no provision for peer discovery, acquisition, or
   authentication in NTP.  Data integrity is provided by the IP and UDP
   checksums.  No circuit-management, duplicate-detection or
   retransmission facilities are provided or necessary.  The service can
   operate in a symmetric mode, in which servers and clients are
   indistinguishable, yet maintain a small amount of state information,
   or in client/server mode, in which servers need maintain no state
   other than that contained in the client request.  A lightweight
   association-management capability, including dynamic reachability and
   variable polling rate mechanisms, is included only to manage the
   state information and reduce resource requirements.  Since only a
   single NTP message format is used, the protocol is easily implemented
   and can be used in a variety of solicited or unsolicited polling
   mechanisms.

   It should be recognized that clock synchronization requires by its
   nature long periods and multiple comparisons in order to maintain
   accurate timekeeping.  While only a few measurements are usually
   adequate to reliably determine local time to within a second or so,



Mills                                                           [Page 6]

RFC 1059                 Network Time Protocol                 July 1988


   periods of many hours and dozens of measurements are required to
   resolve oscillator drift and maintain local time to the order of a
   millisecond.  Thus, the accuracy achieved is directly dependent on
   the time taken to achieve it.  Fortunately, the frequency of
   measurements can be quite low and almost always non-intrusive to
   normal net operations.

2.1.  Implementation Model

   In what may be the most common client/server model a client sends an
   NTP message to one or more servers and processes the replies as
   received.  The server interchanges addresses and ports, overwrites
   certain fields in the message, recalculates the checksum and returns
   the message immediately.  Information included in the NTP message
   allows the client to determine the server time with respect to local
   time and adjust the logical clock accordingly.  In addition, the
   message includes information to calculate the expected timekeeping
   accuracy and reliability, thus select the best from possibly several
   servers.

   While the client/server model may suffice for use on local nets
   involving a public server and perhaps many workstation clients, the
   full generality of NTP requires distributed participation of a number
   of client/servers or peers arranged in a dynamically reconfigurable,
   hierarchically distributed configuration.  It also requires
   sophisticated algorithms for association management, data
   manipulation and logical clock control.  Figure 2.1 shows a possible
   implementation model including four processes sharing a partitioned
   data base, with a partition dedicated to each peer and interconnected
   by a message-passing system.





















Mills                                                           [Page 7]

RFC 1059                 Network Time Protocol                 July 1988


                                +---------+
                                | Update  |
                     +--------->|         +----------+
                     |          |Algorithm|          |
                     |          +----+----+          |
                     |               |               |
                     |               V               V
                +----+----+     +---------+     +---------+
                |         |     |  Local  |     |         |
                | Receive |     |         +---->| Timeout |
                |         |     |  Clock  |     |         |
                +---------+     +---------+     +-+-----+-+
                  A     A                         |     |
                  |     |                         V     V
                ===========================================
                   Peers          Network          Peers

                     Figure 2.1. Implementation Model

   The timeout process, driven by independent timers for each peer,
   collects information in the data base and sends NTP messages to other
   peers in the net.  Each message contains the local time the message
   is sent, together with previously received information and other
   information necessary to compute the estimated error and manage the
   association.  The message transmission rate is determined by the
   accuracy expected of the local system, as well as its peers.

   The receive process receives NTP messages and perhaps messages in
   other protocols as well, including ICMP, other UDP or TCP time
   protocols, local-net protocols and directly connected radio clocks.
   When an NTP message is received the offset between the sender clock
   and the local clock is computed and incorporated into the data base
   along with other information useful for error estimation and clock
   selection.

   The update algorithm is initiated upon receipt of a message and at
   other times.  It processes the offset data from each peer and selects
   the best peer using algorithms such as those described in Section 4.
   This may involve many observations of a few clocks or a few
   observations of many clocks, depending on the accuracies required.

   The local clock process operates upon the offset data produced by the
   update algorithm and adjusts the phase and frequency of the logical
   clock using mechanisms such as described in Section 5.  This may
   result in either a step change or a gradual slew adjustment of the
   logical clock to reduce the offset to zero.  The logical clock
   provides a stable source of time information to other users of the
   system and for subsequent reference by NTP itself.



Mills                                                           [Page 8]

RFC 1059                 Network Time Protocol                 July 1988


2.2.  Network Configurations

   A primary time server is connected to a primary reference source,
   usually a radio clock synchronized to national standard time.  A
   secondary time server derives time synchronization, possibly via
   other secondary servers, from a primary server.  Under normal
   circumstances it is intended that a subnet of primary and secondary
   servers assumes a hierarchical master-slave configuration with the
   more accurate servers near the top and the less accurate below.

   Following conventions established by the telephone industry, the
   accuracy of each server is defined by a number called its stratum,
   with the stratum of a primary server assigned as one and each level
   downwards in the hierarchy assigned as one greater than the preceding
   level.  With current technology and available receiving equipment,
   single-sample accuracies in the order of a millisecond can be
   achieved at the radio clock interface and in the order of a few
   milliseconds at the packet interface to the net.  Accuracies of this
   order require special care in the design and implementation of the
   operating system, such as described in [15], and the logical clock
   mechanism, such as described in Section 5.

   As the stratum increases from one, the single-sample accuracies
   achievable will degrade depending on the communication paths and
   local clock stabilities.  In order to avoid the tedious calculations
   [4] necessary to estimate errors in each specific configuration, it
   is useful to assume the errors accumulate approximately in proportion
   to the minimum total roundtrip path delay between each server and the
   primary reference source to which it is synchronized.  This is called
   the synchronization distance.

   Again drawing from the experience of the telephone industry, who
   learned such lessons at considerable cost, the synchronization paths
   should be organized to produce the highest accuracies, but must never
   be allowed to form a loop.  The clock filter and selection algorithms
   used in NTP accomplish this by using a variant of the Bellman-Ford
   distributed routing algorithm [29] to compute the minimum-weight
   spanning trees rooted on the primary servers.  This results in each
   server operating at the lowest stratum and, in case of multiple peers
   at the same stratum, at the lowest synchronization distance.

   As a result of the above design, the subnet reconfigures
   automatically in a hierarchical master-slave configuration to produce
   the most accurate time, even when one or more primary or secondary
   servers or the communication paths between them fail.  This includes
   the case where all normal primary servers (e.g.,  backbone WWVB
   clocks) on a possibly partitioned subnet fail, but one or more backup
   primary servers (e.g., local WWV clocks) continue operation.



Mills                                                           [Page 9]

RFC 1059                 Network Time Protocol                 July 1988


   However, should all primary servers throughout the subnet fail, the
   remaining secondary servers will synchronize among themselves for
   some time and then gradually drop off the subnet and coast using
   their last offset and frequency computations.  Since these
   computations are expected to be very precise, especially in
   frequency, even extend outage periods of a day or more should result
   in timekeeping errors of not over a few tens of milliseconds.

   In the case of multiple primary servers, the spanning-tree
   computation will usually select the server at minimum synchronization
   distance.  However, when these servers are at approximately the same
   distance, the computation may result in random selections among them
   as the result of normal dispersive delays.  Ordinarily this does not
   degrade accuracy as long as any discrepancy between the primary
   servers is small compared to the synchronization distance.  If not,
   the filter and selection algorithms will select the best of the
   available servers and cast out outlyers as intended.

2.3.  Time Scales

   Since 1972 the various national time scales have been based on
   International Atomic Time (TA), which is currently maintained using
   multiple cesium-beam clocks to an accuracy of a few parts in 10^12.
   The Bureau International de l'Heure (BIH) uses astronomical
   observations provided by the US Naval Observatory and other
   observatories to determine corrections for small changes in the mean
   rotation period of the Earth.  This results in Universal Coordinated
   Time (UTC), which is presently decreasing from TA at a fraction of a
   second per year.  When the magnitude of the correction approaches 0.7
   second, a leap second is inserted or deleted in the UTC time scale on
   the last day of June or December.  Further information on time scales
   can be found in [26].

   For the most precise coordination and timestamping of events since
   1972 it is necessary to know when leap seconds were inserted or
   deleted in UTC and how the seconds are numbered.  A leap second is
   inserted following second 23:59:59 on the last day of June or
   December and becomes second 23:59:60 of that day.  A leap second
   would be deleted by omitting second 23:59:59 on one of these days,
   although this has never happened.  Leap seconds were inserted on the
   following fourteen occasions prior to January 1988 (courtesy US Naval
   Observatory):









Mills                                                          [Page 10]

RFC 1059                 Network Time Protocol                 July 1988


           1  June 1972                    8  December 1978
           2  December 1972                9  December 1979
           3  December 1973                10 June 1981
           4  December 1974                11 June 1982
           5  December 1975                12 June 1983
           6  December 1976                13 June 1985
           7  December 1977                14 December 1987

                 Table 2.1. Dates of Leap-Second Insertion

   Like UTC, NTP operates with an abstract oscillator synchronized in
   frequency to the TA time scale.  At 0000 hours on 1 January 1972 the
   NTP time scale was set to 2,272,060,800, representing the number of
   TA seconds since 0000 hours on 1 January 1900.  The insertion of leap
   seconds in UTC does not affect the oscillator itself, only the
   translation between TA and UTC, or conventional civil time.  However,
   since the only institutional memory assumed by NTP is the UTC radio
   broadcast service, the NTP time scale is in effect reset to UTC as
   each offset estimate is computed.  When a leap second is inserted in
   UTC and subsequently in NTP, knowledge of all previous leap seconds
   is lost.  Thus, if a clock synchronized to NTP in early 1988 was used
   to establish the time of an event that occured in early 1972, it
   would be fourteen seconds early.

   When NTP is used to measure intervals between events that straddle a
   leap second, special considerations apply.  When it is necessary to
   determine the elapsed time between events, such as the half life of a
   proton, NTP timestamps of these events can be used directly.  When it
   is necessary to establish the order of events relative to UTC, such
   as the order of funds transfers, NTP timestamps can also be used
   directly; however, if it is necessary to establish the elapsed time
   between events relative to UTC, such as the intervals between
   payments on a mortgage, NTP timestamps must be converted to UTC using
   the above table and its successors.

   The current formats used by NBS radio broadcast services [2] do not
   include provisions for advance notice of leap seconds, so this
   information must be determined from other sources.  NTP includes
   provisions to distribute advance warnings of leap seconds using the
   Leap Indicator bits described in Section 3.  The protocol is designed
   so that these bits can be set manually at the primary clocks and then
   automatically distributed throughout the system for delivery to all
   logical clocks and then effected as described in Section 5.








Mills                                                          [Page 11]

RFC 1059                 Network Time Protocol                 July 1988


3.  Network Time Protocol

   This section consists of a formal definition of the Network Time
   Protocol, including its data formats, entities, state variables,
   events and event-processing procedures.  The specification model is
   based on the implementation model illustrated in Figure 2.1, but it
   is not intended that this model is the only one upon which a
   specification can be based.  In particular, the specification is
   intended to illustrate and clarify the intrinsic operations of NTP
   and serve as a foundation for a more rigorous, comprehensive and
   verifiable specification.

3.1.  Data Formats

   All mathematical operations expressed or implied herein are in
   two's-complement arithmetic.  Data are specified as integer or
   fixed-point quantities.  Since various implementations would be
   expected to scale externally derived quantities for internal use,
   neither the precision nor decimal-point placement for fixed-point
   quantities is specified.  Unless specified otherwise, all quantities
   are unsigned and may occupy the full field width, if designated, with
   an implied zero preceding the most significant (leftmost) bit.
   Hardware and software packages designed to work with signed
   quantities will thus yield surprising results when the most
   significant (sign) bit is set.  It is suggested that externally
   derived, unsigned fixed-point quantities such as timestamps be
   shifted right one bit for internal use, since the precision
   represented by the full field width is seldom justified.

   Since NTP timestamps are cherished data and, in fact, represent the
   main product of the protocol, a special timestamp format has been
   established.  NTP timestamps are represented as a 64-bit unsigned
   fixed-point number, in seconds relative to 0000 UT on 1 January 1900.
   The integer part is in the first 32 bits and the fraction part in the
   last 32 bits, as shown in the following diagram.

      0                   1                   2                   3
      0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
     +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
     |                         Integer Part                          |
     +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
     |                         Fraction Part                         |
     +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

   This format allows convenient multiple-precision arithmetic and
   conversion to Time Protocol representation (seconds), but does
   complicate the conversion to ICMP Timestamp message representation
   (milliseconds).  The precision of this representation is about 0.2



Mills                                                          [Page 12]

RFC 1059                 Network Time Protocol                 July 1988


   nanosecond, which should be adequate for even the most exotic
   requirements.

   Timestamps are determined by copying the current value of the logical
   clock to a timestamp variable when some significant event, such as
   the arrival of a message, occurs.  In order to maintain the highest
   accuracy, it is important that this be done as close to the hardware
   or software driver associated with the event as possible.  In
   particular, departure timestamps should be redetermined for each
   link-level retransmission.  In some cases a particular timestamp may
   not be available, such as when the host is rebooted or the protocol
   first starts up.  In these cases the 64-bit field is set to zero,
   indicating the value is invalid or undefined.

   Note that since some time in 1968 the most significant bit (bit 0 of
   the Integer Part) has been set and that the 64-bit field will
   overflow some time in 2036.  Should NTP be in use in 2036, some
   external means will be necessary to qualify time relative to 1900 and
   time relative to 2036 (and other multiples of 136 years).
   Timestamped data requiring such qualification will be so precious
   that appropriate means should be readily available.  There will exist
   an 0.2-nanosecond interval, henceforth ignored, every 136 years when
   the 64-bit field will be zero and thus considered invalid.

3.2.  State Variables and Parameters

   Following is a tabular summary of the various state variables and
   parameters used by the protocol.  They are separated into classes of
   system variables, which relate to the operating system environment
   and logical clock mechanism;  peer variables, which are specific to
   each peer operating in symmetric mode or client mode;  packet
   variables, which represent the contents of the NTP message;  and
   parameters, which are fixed in all implementations of the current
   version.  For each class the description of the variable is followed
   by its name and the procedure or value which controls it.  Note that
   variables are in lower case, while parameters are in upper case.















Mills                                                          [Page 13]

RFC 1059                 Network Time Protocol                 July 1988


        System Variables                Name            Control
        -------------------------------------------------------
        Logical Clock                   sys.clock       update
        Clock Source                    sys.peer        selection
                                                        algorithm
        Leap Indicator                  sys.leap        update
        Stratum                         sys.stratum     update
        Precision                       sys.precision   system
        Synchronizing Distance          sys.distance    update
        Estimated Drift Rate            sys.drift       system
        Reference Clock Identifier      sys.refid       update
        Reference Timestamp             sys.reftime     update

                        Table 3.1. System Variables

        Peer Variables                  Name            Control
        -------------------------------------------------------
        Peer Address                    peer.srcadr     system
        Peer Port                       peer.srcport    system
        Local Address                   peer.dstadr     system
        Local Port                      peer.dstport    system
        Peer State                      peer.state      receive,
                                                        transmit
        Reachability Register           peer.reach      receive,
                                                        transmit
        Peer Timer                      peer.timer      system
        Timer Threshold                 peer.threshold  system
        Leap Indicator                  peer.leap       receive
        Stratum                         peer.stratum    receive
        Peer Poll Interval              peer.ppoll      receive
        Host Poll Interval              peer.hpoll      receive,
                                                        transmit
        Precision                       peer.precision  receive
        Synchronizing Distance          peer.distance   receive
        Estimated Drift Rate            peer.drift      receive
        Reference Clock Identifier      peer.refid      receive
        Reference Timestamp             peer.reftime    receive
        Originate Timestamp             peer.org        receive
        Receive Timestamp               peer.rec        receive
        Filter Register                 peer.filter     filter
                                                        algorithm
        Delay Estimate                  peer.delay      filter
                                                        algorithm
        Offset Estimate                 peer.offset     filter
                                                        algorithm
        Dispersion Estimate             peer.dispersion filter

                         Table 3.2. Peer Variables



Mills                                                          [Page 14]

RFC 1059                 Network Time Protocol                 July 1988


        Packet Variables                Name            Control
        -------------------------------------------------------
        Peer Address                    pkt.srcadr      transmit
        Peer Port                       pkt.srcport     transmit
        Local Address                   pkt.dstadr      transmit
        Local Port                      pkt.dstport     transmit
        Leap Indicator                  pkt.leap        transmit
        Version Number                  pkt.version     transmit
        Stratum                         pkt.stratum     transmit
        Poll                            pkt.poll        transmit
        Precision                       pkt.precision   transmit
        Synchronizing Distance          pkt.distance    transmit
        Estimated Drift Rate            pkt.drift       transmit
        Reference Clock Identifier      pkt.refid       transmit
        Reference Timestamp             pkt.reftime     transmit
        Originate Timestamp             pkt.org         transmit
        Receive Timestamp               pkt.rec         transmit
        Transmit Timestamp              pkt.xmt         transmit

                        Table 3.3. Packet Variables

        Parameters                      Name            Value
        -------------------------------------------------------
        NTP Version                     NTP.VERSION     1
        NTP Port                        NTP.PORT        123
        Minimum Polling Interval        NTP.MINPOLL     6 (64 sec)
        Maximum Polling Interval        NTP.MAXPOLL     10 (1024
                                                        sec)
        Maximum Dispersion              NTP.MAXDISP     65535 ms
        Reachability Register Size      PEER.WINDOW     8
        Shift Register Size             PEER.SHIFT      4/8
        Dispersion Threshold            PEER.THRESHOLD  500 ms
        Filter Weight                   PEER.FILTER     .5
        Select Weight                   PEER.SELECT     .75

                           Table 3.4. Parameters

   Following is a description of the various variables used in the
   protocol.  Additional details on formats and use are presented in
   later sections and appendices.

3.2.1.  Common Variables

   The following variables are common to the system, peer and packet
   classes.

   Peer Address (peer.srcadr, pkt.srcadr) Peer Port (peer.srcport,
   pkt.srcport)



Mills                                                          [Page 15]

RFC 1059                 Network Time Protocol                 July 1988


      These are the 32-bit Internet address and 16-bit port number of
      the remote host.

   Local Address (peer.dstadr, pkt.dstadr) Local Port (peer.dstport,
   pkt.dstport)

      These are the 32-bit Internet address and 16-bit port number of
      the local host.  They are included among the state variables to
      support multi-homing.

   Leap Indicator (sys.leap, peer.leap, pkt.leap)

      This is a two-bit code warning of an impending leap second to be
      inserted in the NTP time scale.  The bits are set before 23:59 on
      the day of insertion and reset after 00:01 on the following day.
      This causes the number of seconds (rollover interval) in the day
      of insertion to be increased or decreased by one.  In the case of
      primary servers the bits are set by operator intervention, while
      in the case of secondary servers the bits are set by the protocol.
      The two bits are coded as follows:

                   00      no warning (day has 86400 seconds)
                   01      +1 second (day has 86401 seconds)
                           seconds)
                   10      -1 second (day has 86399 seconds)
                           seconds)
                   11      alarm condition (clock not synchronized)

      In all except the alarm condition (11) NTP itself does nothing
      with these bits, except pass them on to the time-conversion
      routines that are not part of NTP.  The alarm condition occurs
      when, for whatever reason, the logical clock is not synchronized,
      such as when first coming up or after an extended period when no
      outside reference source is available.

   Stratum (sys.stratum, peer.stratum, pkt.stratum)

      This is an integer indicating the stratum of the logical clock.  A
      value of zero is interpreted as unspecified, one as a primary
      clock (synchronized by outside means) and remaining values as the
      stratum level (synchronized by NTP).  For comparison purposes a
      value of zero is considered greater than any other value.

   Peer Poll Interval (peer.ppoll, pkt.poll)

      This is a signed integer used only in symmetric mode and
      indicating the minimum interval between messages sent to the peer,
      in seconds as a power of two.  For instance, a value of six



Mills                                                          [Page 16]

RFC 1059                 Network Time Protocol                 July 1988


      indicates a minimum interval of 64 seconds.  The value of this
      variable must not be less than NTP.MINPOLL and must not be greater
      than NTP.MAXPOLL.

   Precision (sys.precision, peer.precision, pkt.precision)

      This is a signed integer indicating the precision of the logical
      clock, in seconds to the nearest power of two.  For instance, a
      60-Hz line-frequency clock would be assigned the value -6, while a
      1000-Hz crystal-derived clock would be assigned the value -10.

   Synchronizing Distance (sys.distance, peer.distance, pkt.distance)

      This is a fixed-point number indicating the estimated roundtrip
      delay to the primary clock, in seconds.


   Estimated Drift Rate (sys.drift, peer.drift, pkt.drift)

      This is a fixed-point number indicating the estimated drift rate
      of the local clock, in dimensionless units.

   Reference Clock Identifier (sys.refid, peer.refid, pkt.refid)

      This is a code identifying the particular reference clock or
      server.  The interpretation of the value depends on the stratum.
      For stratum values of zero (unspecified) or one (primary clock),
      the value is an ASCII string identifying the reason or clock,
      respectively.  For stratum values greater than one (synchronized
      by NTP), the value is the 32-bit Internet address of the reference
      server.

   Reference Timestamp (sys.reftime, peer.reftime, pkt.reftime)

      This is the local time, in timestamp format, when the logical
      clock was last updated.  If the logical clock has never been
      synchronized, the value is zero.

3.2.2.  System Variables

   The following variables are used by the operating system in order to
   synchronize the logical clock.

   Logical Clock (sys.clock)

      This is the current local time, in timestamp format.  Local time
      is derived from the hardware clock of the particular machine and
      increments at intervals depending on the design used.  An



Mills                                                          [Page 17]

RFC 1059                 Network Time Protocol                 July 1988


      appropriate design, including slewing and drift-compensation
      mechanisms, is described in Section 5.

   Clock Source (sys.peer)

      This is a selector identifying the current clock source.  Usually
      this will be a pointer to a structure containing the peer
      variables.

3.2.3.  Peer Variables

   Following is a list of state variables used by the peer management
   and measurement functions.  There is one set of these variables for
   every peer operating in client mode or symmetric mode.

   Peer State (peer.state)

      This is a bit-encoded quantity used for various control functions.

   Host Poll Interval (peer.hpoll)

      This is a signed integer used only in symmetric mode and
      indicating the minimum interval between messages expected from the
      peer, in seconds as a power of two.  For instance, a value of six
      indicates a minimum interval of 64 seconds.  The value of this
      variable must not be less than NTP.MINPOLL and must not be greater
      than NTP.MAXPOLL.

   Reachability Register (peer.reach)

      This is a code used to determine the reachability status of the
      peer.  It is used as a shift register, with bits entering from the
      least significant (rightmost) end.  The size of this register is
      specified as PEER.SHIFT bits.

   Peer Timer (peer.timer)

      This is an integer counter used to control the interval between
      transmitted NTP messages.

   Timer Threshold (peer.threshold)

      This is the timer value which, when reached, causes the timeout
      procedure to be executed.

   Originate Timestamp (peer.org, pkt.org)

      This is the local time, in timestamp format, at the peer when its



Mills                                                          [Page 18]

RFC 1059                 Network Time Protocol                 July 1988


      latest NTP message was sent.  If the peer becomes unreachable the
      value is set to zero.

   Receive Timestamp (peer.rec, pkt.rec)

      This is the local time, in timestamp format, when the latest NTP
      message from the peer arrived.  If the peer becomes unreachable
      the value is set to zero.

3.2.4.  Packet Variables

   Following is a list of variables used in NTP messages in addition to
   the common variables above.

   Version Number (pkt.version)

      This is an integer indicating the version number of the sender.
      NTP messages will always be sent with the current version number
      NTP.VERSION and will always be accepted if the version number
      matches NTP.VERSION.  Exceptions may be advised on a case-by-case
      basis at times when the version number is changed.

   Transmit Timestamp (pkt.xmt)

      This is the local time, in timestamp format, at which the NTP
      message departed the sender.

3.2.5.  Clock Filter Variables

   When the filter and selection algorithms suggested in Section 4 are
   used, the following state variables are defined.  There is one set of
   these variables for every peer operating in client mode or symmetric
   mode.

   Filter Register (peer.filter)

      This is a shift register of PEER.WINDOW bits, where each stage is
      a tuple consisting of the measured delay concatenated with the
      measured offset associated with a single observation.
      Delay/offset observations enter from the least significant
      (rightmost) right and are shifted towards the most significant
      (leftmost) end and eventually discarded as new observations
      arrive.  The register is cleared to zeros when (a) the peer
      becomes unreachable or (b) the logical clock has just been reset
      so as to cause a significant discontinuity in local time.






Mills                                                          [Page 19]

RFC 1059                 Network Time Protocol                 July 1988


   Delay Estimate (peer.delay)

      This is a signed, fixed-point number indicating the latest delay
      estimate output from the filter, in seconds.  While the number is
      signed, only those values greater than zero represent valid delay
      estimates.

   Offset Estimate (peer.offset)

      This is a signed, fixed-point number indicating the latest offset
      estimate output from the filter, in seconds.

   Dispersion Estimate (peer.dispersion)

      This is a fixed-point number indicating the latest dispersion
      estimate output from the filter, in scrambled units.

3.2.6.  Parameters

   Following is a list of parameters assumed for all implementations
   operating in the Internet system.  It is necessary to agree on the
   values for these parameters in order to avoid unnecessary network
   overheads and stable peer associations.

   Version Number (NTP.VERSION)

      This is the NTP version number, currently one (1).

   NTP Port (NTP.PORT)

      This is the port number (123) assigned by the Internet Number Czar
      to NTP.

   Minimum Polling Interval (NTP.MINPOLL)

      This is the minimum polling interval allowed by any peer of the
      Internet system, currently set to 6 (64 seconds).

   Maximum Polling Interval (NTP.MAXPOLL)

      This is the maximum polling interval allowed by any peer of the
      Internet system, currently set to 10 (1024 seconds).

   Maximum Dispersion (NTP.MAXDISP)

      This is the maximum dispersion assumed by the filter algorithms,
      currently set to 65535 milliseconds.




Mills                                                          [Page 20]

RFC 1059                 Network Time Protocol                 July 1988


   Reachability Register Size (PEER.WINDOW)

      This is the size of the Reachability Register (peer.reach),
      currently set to eight (8) bits.

   Shift Register Size (PEER.SHIFT)

      When the filter and selection algorithms suggested in Section 4
      are used, this is the size of the Clock Filter (peer.filter) shift
      register, in bits.  For crystal-stabilized oscillators a value of
      eight (8) is suggested, while for mains-frequency oscillators a
      value of four (4) is suggested.  Additional considerations are
      given in Section 5.

   Dispersion Threshold (PEER.THRESHOLD)

      When the filter and selection algorithms suggested in Section 4
      are used, this is the threshold used to discard noisy data.  While
      a value of 500 milliseconds is suggested, the value may be changed
      to suit local conditions on particular peer paths.

   Filter Weight (PEER.FILTER)

      When the filter algorithm suggested in Section 4 is used, this is
      the filter weight used to discard noisy data.  While a value of
      0.5 is suggested, the value may be changed to suit local
      conditions on particular peer paths.

   Select Weight (PEER.SELECT)

      When the selection algorithm suggested in Section 4 is used, this
      is the select weight used to discard outlyers.  data.  While a
      value of 0.75 is suggested, the value may be changed to suit local
      conditions on particular peer paths.

3.3.  Modes of Operation

   An NTP host can operate in three modes:  client, server and
   symmetric.  The mode of operation is determined by whether the source
   port (peer.srcport) or destination port (peer.dstport) peer variables
   contain the assigned NTP service port number NTP.PORT (123) as shown
   in the following table.









Mills                                                          [Page 21]

RFC 1059                 Network Time Protocol                 July 1988


           peer.srcport    peer.dstport    Mode
           -------------------------------------------
           not NTP.PORT    not NTP.PORT    not possible
           not NTP.PORT    NTP.PORT        server
           NTP.PORT        not NTP.PORT    client
           NTP.PORT        NTP.PORT        symmetric

   A host operating in client mode occasionally sends an NTP message to
   a host operating in server mode.  The server responds by simply
   interchanging addresses and ports, filling in the required
   information and returning the message to the client.  Servers then
   need retain no state information between client requests.  Clients
   are free to manage the intervals between sending NTP messages to suit
   local conditions.

   In symmetric mode the client/server distinction disappears.  Each
   host maintains a table with as many entries as active peers.  Each
   entry includes a code uniquely identifying the peer (e.g.,  Internet
   address and port), together with status information and a copy of the
   timestamps last received.  A host operating in symmetric mode
   periodically sends NTP messages to each peer including the latest
   copy of the timestamps.  The intervals between sending NTP messages
   are managed jointly by the host and each peer using the polling
   variables peer.ppoll and peer.hpoll.

   When a pair of peers operating in symmetric mode exchange NTP
   messages and each determines that the other is reachable, an
   association is formed.  One or both peers must be in active state;
   that is, sending messages to the other regardless of reachability
   status.  A peer not in active state is in passive state.  If a peer
   operating in passive state discovers that the other peer is no longer
   reachable, it ceases sending messages and reclaims the storage and
   timer resources used by the association.  A peer operating in client
   mode is always in active state, while a peer operating in server mode
   is always in passive state.

3.4.  Event Processing

   The significant events of interest in NTP occur upon expiration of
   the peer timer, one of which is dedicated to each peer operating in
   symmetric or client modes, and upon arrival of an NTP message from
   the various peers.  An event can also occur as the result of an
   operator command or detected system fault, such as a primary clock
   failure.  This section describes the procedures invoked when these
   events occur.






Mills                                                          [Page 22]

RFC 1059                 Network Time Protocol                 July 1988


3.4.1.  Timeout Procedure

   The timeout procedure is called in client and symmetric modes when
   the peer timer (peer.timer) reaches the value of the timer threshold
   (peer.threshold) variable.  First, the reachability register
   (peer.reach) is shifted one position to the left and a zero replaces
   the vacated bit.  Then an NTP message is constructed and sent to the
   peer.  If operating in active state or in passive state and
   peer.reach is nonzero (reachable), the peer.timer is reinitialized
   (resumes counting from zero) and the value of peer.threshold is set
   to:

           peer.threshold <- max( min( peer.ppoll, peer.hpoll,
                           NTP.MAXPOLL), NTP.MINPOLL) .

   If operating in active state and peer.reach is zero (unreachable),
   the peer variables are updated as follows:

                   peer.hpoll <- NTP.MINPOLL
                   peer.disp <- NTP.MAXDISP
                   peer.filter <- 0 (cleared)
                   peer.org <- 0
                   peer.rec <- 0

   Then the clock selection algorithm is called, which may result in a
   new clock source (sys.peer).  In other cases the protocol ceases
   operation and the storage and timer resources are reclaimed for
   subsequent use.

   An NTP message is constructed as follows (see Appendices A and B for
   formats).  First, the IP and UDP packet variables are copied from the
   peer variables (note the interchange of source and destination
   addresses and ports):

           pkt.srcadr <- peer.dstadr       pkt.srcport <- peer.dstport
           pkt.dstadr <- peer.srcadr       pkt.dstport <- peer.srcport

   Next, the NTP packet variables are copied (rescaled as necessary)
   from the system and peer variables:

           pkt.leap <- sys.leap            pkt.distance <- sys.distance
           pkt.version <- NTP.VERSION      pkt.drift <- sys.drift
           pkt.stratum <- sys.stratum      pkt.refid <- sys.refid
           pkt.poll <- peer.hpoll          pkt.reftime <- sys.reftime
           pkt.precision <- sys.precision

   Finally, the NTP packet timestamp variables are copied, depending on
   whether the peer is operating in symmetric mode and reachable, in



Mills                                                          [Page 23]

RFC 1059                 Network Time Protocol                 July 1988


   symmetric mode and not reachable (but active) or in client mode:

   Symmetric Reachable     Symmetric Active        Client
   - -------------------     -------------------     -------------------
   pkt.org <- peer.org     pkt.org <- 0            pkt.org <- sys.clock
   pkt.rec <- peer.rec     pkt.rec <- 0            pkt.rec <- sys.clock
   pkt.xmt <- sys.clock    pkt.xmt <- sys.clock    pkt.xmt <- sys.clock

   Note that the order of copying should be designed so that the time to
   perform the copy operations themselves does not degrade the
   measurement accuracy, which implies that the sys.clock values should
   be copied last.  The reason for the choice of zeros to fill the
   pkt.org and pkt.rec packet variables in the symmetric unreachable
   case is to avoid the use of old data after a possibly extensive
   period of unreachability.  The reason for the choice of sys.clock to
   fill these variables in the client case is that, if for some reason
   the NTP message is returned by the recipient unaltered, as when
   testing with an Internet-echo server, this convention still allows at
   least the roundtrip time to be accurately determined without special
   handling.

3.4.2.  Receive Procedure

   The receive procedure is executed upon arrival of an NTP message.  If
   the version number of the message (pkt.version) does not match the
   current version number (NTP.VERSION), the message is discarded;
   however, exceptions may be advised on a case-by-case basis at times
   when the version number is changed.

   If the clock of the sender is unsynchronized (pkt.leap = 11), or the
   receiver is in server mode or the receiver is in symmetric mode and
   the stratum of the sender is greater than the stratum of the receiver
   (pkt.stratum > sys.stratum), the message is simply returned to the
   sender along with the timestamps.  In this case the addresses and
   ports are interchanged in the IP and UDP headers:

        pkt.srcadr <-> pkt.dstadr       pkt.srcport <-> pkt.dstport

   The following packet variables are updated from the system variables:

        pkt.leap <- sys.leap            pkt.distance <- sys.distance
        pkt.version <- NTP.VERSION      pkt.drift <- sys.drift
        pkt.stratum <- sys.stratum      pkt.refid <- sys.refid
        pkt.precision <- sys.precision  pkt.reftime <- sys.reftime

   Note that the pkt.poll packet variable is unchanged.  The timestamps
   are updated in the order shown:




Mills                                                          [Page 24]

RFC 1059                 Network Time Protocol                 July 1988


                        pkt.org <- pkt.xmt
                        pkt.rec <- sys.clock
                        pkt.xmt <- sys.clock

   Finally, the message is forwarded to the sender and the server
   receive procedure terminated at this point.

   If the above is not the case, the source and destination Internet
   addresses and ports in the IP and UDP headers are matched to the
   correct peer.  If there is a match, processing continues at the next
   step below.  If there is no match and symmetric mode is not indicated
   (either pkt.srcport or pkt.dstport not equal to NTP.PORT), the
   message must be a reply to a previously sent message from a client
   which is no longer in operation.  In this case the message is dropped
   and the receive procedure terminated at this point.

   If there is no match and symmetric mode is indicated, (both
   pkt.srcport and pkt.dstport equal to NTP.PORT), an implementation-
   specific instantiation procedure is called to create and initialize a
   new set of peer variables and start the peer timer.  The following
   peer variables are set from the IP and UDP headers:

           peer.srcadr <- pkt.srcadr       peer.srcport <- pkt.srcport
           peer.dstadr <- pkt.dstadr       peer.dstport <- pkt.dstport


   The following peer variables are initialized:

                   peer.state <- symmetric (passive)
                   peer.timer <- 0 (enabled)
                   peer.hpoll <- NTP.MINPOLL
                   peer.disp <- NTP.MAXDISP

   The remaining peer variables are undefined and set to zero.

   Assuming that instantiation is complete and that match occurs, the
   least significant bit of the reachability register (peer.reach) is
   set, indicating the peer is now reachable.  The following peer
   variables are copied (rescaled as necessary) from the NTP packet
   variables and system variables:











Mills                                                          [Page 25]

RFC 1059                 Network Time Protocol                 July 1988


           peer.leap <- pkt.leap           peer.distance <- pkt.distance
           peer.stratum <- pkt.stratum     peer.drift <- pkt.drift
           peer.ppoll <- pkt.poll          peer.refid <- pkt.refid
           peer.precision <- pkt.precision peer.reftime <- pkt.reftime
           peer.org <- pkt.xmt             peer.rec <- sys.clock
           peer.threshold <- max( min( peer.ppoll, peer.hpoll,
                           NTP.MAXPOLL), NTP.MINPOLL)

   If either or both the pkt.org or pkt.rec packet variables are zero,
   the sender did not have reliable values for them, so the receive
   procedure is terminated at this point.  If both of these variables
   are nonzero, the roundtrip delay and clock offset relative to the
   peer are calculated as follows.  Number the times of sending and
   receiving NTP messages as shown in Figure 3.1 and let i be an even
   integer.  Then t(i-3), t(i-2) and t(i-1) and t(i) are the contents of
   the pkt.org, pkt.rec, pkt.xmt and peer.rec variables respectively.

                        |                    |
                   t(1) |------------------->| t(2)
                        |                    |
                   t(4) |<-------------------| t(3)
                        |                    |
                   t(5) |------------------->| t(6)
                        |                    |
                   t(8) |<-------------------| t(7)
                        |                    |
                                 ...
                Figure 3.1. Calculating Delay and Offset

   The roundtrip delay d and clock offset c of the receiving peer
   relative to the sending peer is:

                   d = (t(i) - t(i-3)) - (t(i-1) - t(i-2))
                c = [(t(i-2) - t(i-3)) + (t(i-1) - t(i))]/2 .

   This method amounts to a continuously sampled, returnable-time
   system, which is used in some digital telephone networks.  Among the
   advantages are that the order and timing of the messages is
   unimportant and that reliable delivery is not required.  Obviously,
   the accuracies achievable depend upon the statistical properties of
   the outbound and inbound net paths.  Further analysis and
   experimental results bearing on this issue can be found in
   Appendix D.

   The c and d values are then input to the clock filter algorithm to
   produce the delay estimate (peer.delay) and offset estimate
   (peer.offset) for the peer involved.  If d becomes nonpositive due to
   low delays, long polling intervals and high drift rates, it should be



Mills                                                          [Page 26]

RFC 1059                 Network Time Protocol                 July 1988


   considered invalid;  however, even under these conditions it may
   still be useful to update the local clock and reduce the drift rate
   to the point that d becomes positive again.  Specification of the
   clock filter algorithm is not an integral part of the NTP
   specification;  however, one found to work well in the Internet
   environment is described in Section 4.

   When a primary clock is connected to the host, it is convenient to
   incorporate its information into the data base as if the clock were
   represented by an ordinary peer.  The clocks are usually polled once
   or twice a minute and the returned timecheck used to produce a new
   update for the logical clock.  The update procedure is then called
   with the following assumed peer variables:

                   peer.offset <- timecheck - sys.clock
                   peer.delay <- as determined
                   peer.dispersion <- 0
                   peer.leap <- selected by operator, ordinarily 00
                   peer.stratum <- 0
                   peer.distance <- 0
                   peer.refid <- ASCII identifier
                   peer.reftime <- timecheck

   In this case the peer.delay and peer.refid can be constants
   reflecting the type and accuracy of the clock.  By convention, the
   value for peer.delay is ten times the expected mean error of the
   clock, for instance, 10 milliseconds for a WWVB clock and 1000
   milliseconds for a less accurate WWV clock, but with a floor of 100
   milliseconds.  Other peer variables such as the peer timer and
   reachability register can be used to control the polling interval and
   to confirm the clock is operating correctly.  In this way the clock
   filter and selection algorithms operate in the usual way and can be
   used to mitigate the clock itself, should it appear to be operating
   correctly, yet deliver bogus time.

3.4.3.  Update Procedure

   The update procedure is called when a new delay/offset estimate is
   available.  First, the clock selection algorithm determines the best
   peer on the basis of estimated accuracy and reliability, which may
   result in a new clock source (sys.peer).  If sys.peer points to the
   peer data structure with the just-updated estimates, the state
   variables of that peer are used to update the system state variables








Mills                                                          [Page 27]

RFC 1059                 Network Time Protocol                 July 1988


   as follows:

                   sys.leap <- peer.leap
                   sys.stratum <- peer.stratum + 1
                   sys.distance <- peer.distance + peer.delay
                   sys.refid <- peer.srcadr
                   sys.reftime <- peer.rec

   Finally, the logical clock procedure is called with peer.offset as
   argument to update the logical clock (sys.clock) and recompute the
   estimated drift rate (sys.drift).  It may happen that the logical
   clock may be reset, rather than slewed to its final value.  In this
   case the peer variables of all reachable peers are are updated as
   follows:

                   peer.hpoll <- NTP.MINPOLL
                   peer.disp <- NTP.MAXDISP
                   peer.filter <- 0 (cleared)
                   peer.org <- 0
                   peer.rec <- 0

   and the clock selection algorithm is called again, which results in a
   null clock source (sys.peer = 0).  A new selection will occur when
   the filters fill up again and the dispersion settles down.

   Specification of the clock selection algorithm and logical clock
   procedure is not an integral part of the NTP specification.  A clock
   selection algorithm found to work well in the Internet environment is
   described in Section 4, while a logical clock procedure is described
   in Section 5.  The clock selection algorithm described in Section 4
   usually picks the server at the highest stratum and minimum delay
   among all those available, unless that server appears to be a
   falseticker.  The result is that the algorithms all work to build a
   minimum-weight spanning tree relative to the primary servers and thus
   a hierarchical master-slave system similar to those used by some
   digital telephone networks.















Mills                                                          [Page 28]

RFC 1059                 Network Time Protocol                 July 1988


3.4.4.  Initialization Procedures

   Upon reboot the NTP host initializes all system variables as follows:

                   sys.clock <- best available estimate
                   sys.leap <- 11 (unsynchronized)
                   sys.stratum <- 0 (undefined)
                   sys.precision <- as required
                   sys.distance <- 0 (undefined)
                   sys.drift <- as determined
                   sys.refid <- 0 (undefined)
                   sys.reftime <- 0 (undefined)

   The logical clock sys.clock is presumably undefined at reboot;
   however, in some designs such as the Fuzzball an estimate is
   available from the reboot environment.  The sys.precision variable is
   determined by the intrinsic architecture of the local hardware clock.
   The sys.drift variable is determined as a side effect of subsequent
   logical clock updates, from whatever source.

   Next, an implementation-specific instantiation procedure is called
   repeatedly to establish the set of client peers or symmetric (active)
   peers which will actively probe other servers during regular
   operation.  The mode and addresses of these peers is determined using
   information read during the reboot procedure or as the result of
   operator commands.

4.  Filtering Algorithms

   A very important factor affecting the accuracy and reliability of
   time distribution is the complex of algorithms used to deglitch and
   smooth the offset estimates and to cast out outlyers due to failure
   of the primary reference sources or propagation media.  The
   algorithms suggested in this section were developed and refined over
   several years of operation in the Internet under widely varying net
   configurations and utilizations.  While these algorithms are believed
   the best available at the present time, they are not an integral part
   of the NTP specification.

   There are two algorithms described in the following, the clock filter
   algorithm, which is used to select the best offset samples from a
   given clock, and the clock selection algorithm, which is used to
   select the best clock among a hierarchical set of clocks.

4.1.  Clock Filter Algorithm

   The clock filter algorithm is executed upon arrival of each NTP
   message that results in new delay/offset sample pairs.  New sample



Mills                                                          [Page 29]

RFC 1059                 Network Time Protocol                 July 1988


   pairs are shifted into the filter register (peer.filter) from the
   left end, causing first zeros then old sample pairs to shift off the
   right end.  Then those sample pairs in peer.filter with nonzero delay
   are inserted on a temporary list and sorted in order of increasing
   delay.  The delay estimate (peer.delay) and offset estimate
   (peer.offset) are chosen as the delay/offset values corresponding to
   the minimum-delay sample.  In case of ties an arbitrary choice is
   made.

   The dispersion estimate (peer.dispersion) is then computed as the
   weighted sum of the offsets in the list.  Assume the list has
   PEER.SHIFT entries, the first m of which contain valid samples in
   order of increasing delay.  If X(i) (0 =< i < PEER.SHIFT) is the
   offset of the ith sample, then,

           d(i) = |X(i) - X(0)|    if i < m and |X(i) - X(0)| < 2^15
           d(i) = 2^15 - 1         otherwise

                   peer.dispersion = Sum(d(i)*w^i) ,
                           (0 =< i < PEER.SHIFT)

   where w < 1 is a weighting factor experimentally adjusted to match
   typical offset distributions.  The peer.dispersion variable is
   intended for use as a quality indicator, with increasing values
   associated with decreasing quality.  The intent is that samples with
   a peer.dispersion exceeding a configuration threshold will not be
   used in subsequent processing.  The prototype implementation uses a
   weighting factor w = 0.5, also called PEER.FILTER, and a threshold
   PEER.THRESHOLD of 500 ms, which insures that all stages of
   peer.filter are filled and contain offsets within a few seconds of
   each other.

4.2.  Clock Selection Algorithm

   The clock selection algorithm uses the values of peer.delay,
   peer.offset and peer.dispersion calculated by the clock filter
   algorithm and is called when these values change or when the
   reachability status changes.  It constructs a list of candidate
   estimates according to a set of criteria designed to maximize
   accuracy and reliability, then sorts the list in order of estimated
   precision.  Finally, it repeatedly casts out outlyers on the basis of
   dispersion until only a single candidate is left.

   The selection process operates on each peer in turn and inspects the
   various data captured from the last received NTP message header, as
   well as the latest clock filter estimates.  It selects only those
   peers for which the following criteria are satisfied:




Mills                                                          [Page 30]

RFC 1059                 Network Time Protocol                 July 1988


   1.  The peer must be reachable and operating in client or symmetric
       modes.

   2.  The peer logical clock must be synchronized, as indicated by the
       Leap Indicator bits being other than 11.

   3.  If the peer is operating at stratum two or greater, it must not
       be synchronized to this host, which means its reference clock
       identifier (peer.refid) must not match the Internet address of
       this host.  This is analogous to the split-horizon rule used in
       some variants of the Bellman-Ford routing algorithm.

   4.  The sum of the peer synchronizing distance (peer.distance) plus
       peer.delay must be less than 2^13 (8192) milliseconds.  Also, the
       peer stratum (peer.stratum) must be less than eight and
       peer.dispersion must be less than a configured threshold
       PEER.THRESHOLD (currently 500 ms).  These range checks were
       established through experience with the prototype implementation,
       but may be changed in future.

   For each peer which satisfies the above criteria, a sixteen-bit
   keyword is constructed, with the low-order thirteen bits the sum of
   peer.distance plus peer.delay and the high-order three bits the
   peer.stratum reduced by one and truncated to three bits (thus mapping
   zero to seven).  The keyword together with a pointer to the peer data
   structure are inserted according to increasing keyword values and
   truncated at a maximum of eight entries.  The resulting list
   represents the order in which peers should be chosen according to the
   estimated precision of measurement.  If no keywords are found, the
   clock source variable (sys.peer) is set to zero and the algorithm
   terminates.

   The final procedure is designed to detect falsetickers or other
   conditions which might result in gross errors.  Let m be the number
   of samples remaining in the list.  For each i (0 =< i < m) compute
   the dispersion d(i) of the list relative to i:

                   d(i) = Sum(|X(j) - X(i)|*w^j) ,
                       (0 =< j < m)

   where w < 1 is a weighting factor experimentally adjusted for the
   desired characteristic (see below).  Then cast out the entry with
   maximum d(i) or, in case of ties, the maximum i, and repeat the
   procedure.  When only a single entry remains in the list, sys.peer is
   set as its peer data structure pointer and the peer.hpoll variable in
   that structure is set to NTP.MINPOLL as required by the logical clock
   mechanism described in Section 5.




Mills                                                          [Page 31]

RFC 1059                 Network Time Protocol                 July 1988


   This procedure is designed to favor those peers near the head of the
   list, which are at the highest stratum and lowest delay and
   presumably can provide the most precise time.  With proper selection
   of weighting factor w, also called PEER.SELECT, entries will be
   trimmed from the tail of the list, unless a few outlyers disagree
   significantly with respect to the remaining entries, in which case
   the outlyers are discarded first.

   In order to see how this procedure works to select outlyers, consider
   the case of three entries and assume that one or more of the offsets
   are clustered about zero and others are clustered about one.  For w =
   0.75 as used in the prototype implementations and multiplying by 16
   for convenience, the first entry has weight w^0 = 16, the second w^1
   = 12 and the third w^2 = 9.  Table X shows for all combinations of
   peer offsets the calculated dispersion about each of the three
   entries, along with the results of the procedure.

      Peer 0    1    2         Dispersion          Cast    Result
    Weight 16   12   9     0       1       2       Out
           ------------------------------------------------------
           0    0    0     0       0       0       2       0    0
           0    0    1     9       9       28      2       0    0
           0    1    0     12      25      12      1       0    0
           0    1    1     21      16      16      0       1    1
           1    0    0     21      16      16      0       0    0
           1    0    1     12      25      12      1       1    1
           1    1    0     9       9       28      2       1    1
           1    1    1     0       0       0       2       1    1

                  Table 4.1. Outlyer Selection Procedure

   In the four cases where peer 0 and peer 1 disagree, the outcome is
   determined by peer 2.  Similar outcomes occur in the case of four
   peers.  While these outcomes depend on judicious choice of w, the
   behavior of the algorithm is substantially the same for values of w
   between 0.5 and 1.0.

4.3.  Variable-Rate Polling

   As NTP service matures in the Internet, the resulting network traffic
   can become burdensome, especially in the primary service net.  In
   this expectation, it is useful to explore variable-rate polling, in
   which the intervals between NTP messages can be adjusted to fit
   prevailing network conditions of delay dispersion and loss rate.  The
   prototype NTP implementation uses this technique to reduce the
   network overheads to one-sixteenth the maximum rate, depending on
   observed dispersion and loss.




Mills                                                          [Page 32]

RFC 1059                 Network Time Protocol                 July 1988


   The prototype implementation adjusts the polling interval peer.hpoll
   in response to the reachability register (peer.reach) variable along
   with the dispersion (peer.dispersion) variable.  So long as the clock
   source variable (sys.peer) does not point to the peer data structure,
   peer.reach is nonzero (reachable) and peer.dispersion is less than
   the PEER.THRESHOLD parameter, the value of peer.hpoll is increased by
   one for each call on the update procedure, subject to a maximum of
   NTP.MAXPOLL.  Following the timeout procedure, if peer.reach
   indicates messages have not been received for the preceding two
   polling intervals (low-order two bits are zero), the value of
   peer.hpoll is decreased by one, subject to a minimum of NTP.MINPOLL.
   If peer.reach becomes zero (unreachable), the value of peer.hpoll is
   set to NTP.MINPOLL.

   The result of the above mechanism is that the polling intervals for
   peers not selected for synchronization and in symmetric mode creep
   upwards once the filter register (peer.filter) has filled and the
   peer.dispersion has settled down, but decrease again in case
   peer.dispersion increases or the loss rate increases or the peer
   becomes unreachable.

5.  Logical Clocks

   In order to implement a logical clock, the host must be equipped with
   a hardware clock consisting of an oscillator and interface and
   capable of the required precision and stability.  The logical clock
   is adjusted by means of periodic offset corrections computed by NTP
   or some other time-synchronization protocol such as Hellospeak [15]
   or the Unix 4.3bsd TSP [20].  Following is a description of the
   Fuzzball logical clock, which includes provisions for precise time
   and frequency adjustment and can maintain time to within a
   millisecond and frequency to within a day per millisecond.

   The logical clock is implemented using a 48-bit Clock Register, which
   increments at 1000-Hz (at the decimal point), a 32-bit Clock-Adjust
   Register, which is used to slew the Clock Register in response to
   offset corrections, and a Drift-Compensation Register, which is used
   to trim the oscillator frequency.  In some interface designs such as
   the DEC KWV11, an additional hardware register, the Counter Register,
   is used as an auxiliary counter.  The configuration and decimal point
   of these registers are shown in Figure 5.1.










Mills                                                          [Page 33]

RFC 1059                 Network Time Protocol                 July 1988


           Clock Register

           0               16               32
           +---------------+---------------+---------------+
           |               |               |               |
           +---------------+---------------+---------------+
                                           A
                                     decimal point

           Clock-Adjust Register

                           0               16
                           +---------------+---------------+
                           |               |               |
                           +---------------+---------------+
                                           A
                                     decimal point

           Drift-Compensation Register

                           0               16
                           +---------------+
                           |               |
                           +---------------+
                                           A
                                     decimal point

           Counter Register

                           0               16
                           +---------------+
                           |               |
                           +---------------+
                                           A
                                     decimal point

                        Figure 5.1. Clock Registers

   The Clock Register, Clock-Adjust Register and Drift-Compensation
   Register are implemented in memory.  In typical clock interface
   designs such as the DEC KWV11, the Counter Register is implemented as
   a buffered counter driven by a crystal oscillator.  A counter
   overflow is signalled by an interrupt, which results in an increment
   of the Clock Register at bit 15 and the propagation of carries as
   required.  The time of day is determined by reading the Counter
   Register, which does not disturb the counting process, and adding its
   value to that of the Clock Register with decimal points aligned.




Mills                                                          [Page 34]

RFC 1059                 Network Time Protocol                 July 1988


   In other interface designs such as the LSI-11 event-line mechanism,
   each tick of the clock is signalled by an interrupt at intervals of
   16-2/3 or 20 ms, depending on interface and mains frequency.  When
   this occurs the appropriate increment in milliseconds, expressed to
   32 bits in precision, is added to the Clock Register with decimal
   points aligned.

5.1.  Uniform Phase Adjustments

   Left uncorrected, the logical clock runs at the rate of its intrinsic
   oscillator.  A correction is introduced as a signed 32-bit integer in
   milliseconds, which is added to the Drift-Compensation Register and
   also replaces bits 0-15 of the Clock-Adjust Register, with bits 16-31
   set to zero.  At adjustment intervals of CLOCK.ADJ a correction
   consisting of two components is computed.  The first (phase)
   component consists of the Clock-Adjust Register shifted right
   CLOCK.PHASE bits, which is then subtracted from the Clock-Adjust
   Register.  The second (frequency) component consists of the Drift-
   Compensation Register shifted right CLOCK.FREQ bits.  The sum of the
   phase and frequency components is the correction, which is then added
   to the Clock Register.  Operation continues in this way until a new
   correction is introduced.

   Care is required in the implementation to insure monotonicity of the
   Clock Register and to preserve the highest precision while minimizing
   the propagation of roundoff errors.  This can be done by buffering
   the corrections and adding them to the increment at the time the
   Clock Register is next updated.  Monotonicity is insured with the
   parameters shown in Table 5.1, as long as the increment is at least 2
   ms.  This table shows the above parameters and others discussed below
   for both a crystal-stabilized oscillator and a mains-frequency
   oscillator.

   Parameter               Name            Crystal         Mains
   -------------------------------------------------------------------
   Update Interval         CLOCK.ADJ       4 sec           1 sec
   Phase Shift             CLOCK.PHASE     -8              -9
   Frequency Shift         CLOCK.FREQ      -16             -16
   Maximum Aperture        CLOCK.MAX       +-128 ms        +-256 ms
   Shift Register Size     PEER.SHIFT      8               4
   Host Poll Interval      peer.hpoll      NTP.MINPOLL     NTP.MINPOLL
                                            (64 sec)        (64 sec)

                        Table 5.1. Clock Parameters

   The above design constitutes a second-order phase-lock loop which
   adjusts the logical clock phase and frequency to compensate for the
   intrinsic oscillator jitter, wander and drift.  Simulation of a loop



Mills                                                          [Page 35]

RFC 1059                 Network Time Protocol                 July 1988


   with parameters chosen from Table 5.1 for a crystal-stabilized
   oscillator and the clock filter described in Section 4 results in the
   following transient response:  For a phase correction of 100 ms the
   loop reaches zero error in 34 minutes, overshoots 7 ms in 76 minutes
   and settles to less than 1 ms in about four hours.  The maximum
   frequency error is about 6 ppm at 40 minutes and returns to less than
   1 ppm in about eight hours.  For a frequency correction of 10 ppm the
   loop settles to within 1 ppm in about nine hours and to within 0.1
   ppm in about a day.  These characteristics are appropriate for
   typical computing equipment using board-mounted crystals without oven
   temperature control.

   In those cases where mains-frequency oscillators must be used, the
   loop parameters must be adapted for the relatively high jitter and
   wander characteristics of the national power grid, in which diurnal
   peak-to-peak phase excursions can exceed four seconds.  Simulation of
   a loop with parameters chosen from Table 5.1 for a mains-frequency
   oscillator and the clock filter described in Section 4 results in a
   transient response similar to the crystal-stabilized case, but with
   time constants only one-fourth those in that case.  When presented
   with actual phase-offset data for typical Summer days when the jitter
   and wander are the largest, the loop errors are in the order of a few
   tens of milliseconds, but not greater than 150 ms.

   The above simulations assume the clock filter algorithm operates to
   select the oldest sample in the shift register at each step;  that
   is, the filter operates as a delay line with delay equal to the
   polling interval times the number of stages.  This is a worst-case
   scenario, since the larger the overall delay the harder it is to
   maintain low loop errors together with good transient response.  The
   parameters in Table 5.1 were experimentally determined with this
   scenario and the constraint that the polling interval could not be
   reduced below 64 seconds.  With these parameters it is not possible
   to increase the polling interval above 64 seconds without significant
   increase in loop error or degradation of transient response.  Thus,
   when a clock is selected according to the algorithms of Section 4,
   the polling interval peer.hpoll is always set at NTP.MINPOLL.

5.2.  Nonuniform Phase Adjustments

   When the magnitude of a correction exceeds a maximum aperture
   CLOCK.MAX, the possibility exists that the clock is so far out of
   synchronization with the reference source that the best action is an
   immediate and wholesale replacement of Clock Register contents,
   rather than a graduated slewing as described above.  In practice the
   necessity to do this is rare and occurs when the local host or
   reference source is rebooted, for example.  This is fortunate, since
   step changes in the clock can result in the clock apparently running



Mills                                                          [Page 36]

RFC 1059                 Network Time Protocol                 July 1988


   backward, as well as incorrect delay and offset measurements of the
   synchronization mechanism itself.

   Considerable experience with the Internet environment suggests the
   values of CLOCK.MAX tabulated in Table 5.1 as appropriate.  In
   practice, these values are exceeded with a single time-server source
   only under conditions of the most extreme congestion or when multiple
   failures of nodes or links have occured.  The most common case when
   the maximum is exceeded is when the time-server source is changed and
   the time indicated by the new and old sources exceeds the maximum due
   to systematic errors in the primary reference source or large
   differences in the synchronizing path delays.

5.3.  Maintaining Date and Time

   Conversion from NTP format to the common date and time formats used
   by application programs is simplified if the internal local-clock
   format uses separate date and time registers.  The time register is
   designed to roll over at 24 hours, give or take a leap second as
   determined by the Leap Indicator bits, with its overflows
   (underflows) incrementing (decrementing) the date register.  The date
   and time registers then indicate the number of days and seconds since
   some previous reference time, but uncorrected for leap seconds.

   On the day prior to the insertion of a leap second the Leap Indicator
   bits are set at the primary servers, presumably by manual means.
   Subsequently, these bits show up at the local host and are passed to
   the logical clock procedure.  This causes the modulus of the time
   register, which is the length of the current day, to be increased or
   decreased by one second as appropriate.  On the day following
   insertion the bits are turned off at the primary servers.  While it
   is possible to turn the bits off automatically, the procedure
   suggested here insures that all clocks have rolled over and will not
   be reset incorrectly to the previous day as the result of possible
   corrections near the instant of rollover.

5.4.  Estimating Errors

   After an NTP message is received and until the next one is received,
   the accuracy of the local clock can be expected to degrade somewhat.
   The magnitude of this degradation depends on the error at the last
   update time together with the drift of the local oscillator with
   respect to time.  It is possible to estimate both the error and drift
   rate from data collected during regular operation.  These data can be
   used to determine the rate at which NTP neighbors should exchange NTP
   messages and thus control net overheads.

   NTP messages include the local-clock precision of the sender, as well



Mills                                                          [Page 37]

RFC 1059                 Network Time Protocol                 July 1988


   as the reference time, estimated drift and a quantity called the
   synchronizing distance.  The precision of the local clock, together
   with its peer clocks, establishes the short-term jitter
   characteristics of the offset estimates.  The reference time and
   estimated drift of the sender provide an error estimate at the time
   the latest update was received.  The synchronizing distance provides
   an estimate of error relative to the primary reference source and is
   used by the filtering algorithms to improve the quality and
   reliability of the offset estimates.

   Estimates of error and drift rate are not essential for the correct
   functioning of the clock algorithms, but do improve the accuracy and
   adjustment with respect to net overheads.  The estimated error allows
   the recipient to compute the rate at which independent samples are
   required in order to maintain a specified estimated error.  The
   estimated drift rate allows the recipient to estimate the optimum
   polling interval.

   It is possible to compute the estimated drift rate of the local clock
   to a high degree of precision by simply adding the n offsets received
   during an interval T to an accumulator.  If X1 and X2 are the values
   of the accumulator at the beginning and end of T, then the estimated
   drift rate r is:

                               X2 - X1  n
                           r = ------- --- .
                                  n     T

   The intrinsic (uncorrected) drift rate of typical crystal oscillators
   under room-temperature conditions is in the order of from a few parts
   per million (ppm) to as much as 100 ppm, or up to a few seconds per
   day.  For most purposes the drift of a particular crystal oscillator
   is constant to within perhaps one ppm.  Assuming T can be estimated
   to within 100 ms, for example, it would take about a day of
   accumulation to estimate r to an uncertainty in the order of one ppm.

   Some idea of the estimated error of the local clock can be derived
   from the variance of the offsets about the mean per unit time.  This
   can be computed by adding the n offset squares received during T to
   an accumulator.  If Y1 and Y2 are the values of the accumulator at
   the beginning and end of T, then the estimated error s is:

                         Y2 - Y1   (X2 - X1)^2    n
                   s = ( ------- - ----------- ) --- .
                            n         n * n       T

   The quantities r and s have direct utility to the peer as noted
   above.  However, they also have indirect utility to the recipient of



Mills                                                          [Page 38]

RFC 1059                 Network Time Protocol                 July 1988


   an NTP message sent by that peer, since they can be used as weights
   in such algorithms as described in [22], as well as to improve the
   estimates during periods when offsets are not available.  It is most
   useful if the latest estimate of these quantities are available in
   each NTP message sent;  however, considerable latitude remains in the
   details of computation and storage.

   The above formulae for r and s imply equal weighting for offsets
   received throughout the accumulation interval T.  One way to do this
   is using a software shift register implemented as a circular buffer.
   A single pointer points to the active entry in the buffer and
   advances around one entry as each new offset is stored.  There are
   two accumulators, one for the offset and the other for its squares.
   When a new offset arrives, a quantity equal to the new offset minus
   the old (active) entry is added to the first accumulator and the
   square of this quantity is added to the second.  Finally, the offset
   is stored in the circular buffer.

   The size of the circular buffer depends on the accumulation interval
   T and the rate offsets are produced.  In many reachability and
   routing algorithms, such as GGP, EGP and local-net control
   algorithms, peers exchange messages on the order of once or twice a
   minute.  If NTP peers exchanged messages at a rate of one per minute
   and if T were one day, the circular buffer would have to be 1440
   words long;  however, a less costly design might aggregate the data
   in something like half-hour segments, which would reduce the length
   of the buffer to 48 words while not significantly affecting the
   quality of the data.























Mills                                                          [Page 39]

RFC 1059                 Network Time Protocol                 July 1988


6.  References

   1.  Lamport, L., "Time, Clocks and the Ordering of Events in a
       Distributed System", Communications of the ACM, Vol. 21, No. 7,
       pgs.  558-565, July 1978.

   2.  "Time and Frequency Dissemination Services", NBS Special
       Publication No. 432, US Department of Commerce, 1979.

   3.  Lindsay, W., and A.  Kantak, "Network Synchronization of Random
       Signals", IEEE Trans. Comm., COM-28, No. 8, pgs. 1260-1266,
       August 1980.

   4.  Braun, W., "Short Term Frequency Effects in Networks of Coupled
       Oscillators", IEEE Trans. Comm., COM-28, No. 8, pgs. 1269-1275,
       August 1980.

   5.  Mitra, D., "Network Synchronization:  Analysis of a Hybrid of
       Master-Slave and Mutual Synchronization", IEEE Trans. Comm.
       COM-28, No. 8, pgs. 1245-1259, August 1980.

   6.  Postel, J., "User Datagram Protocol", RFC-768, USC/Information
       Sciences Institute, August 1980.

   7.  Mills, D., "Time Synchronization in DCNET Hosts", IEN-173, COMSAT
       Laboratories, February 1981.

   8.  Mills, D., "DCNET Internet Clock Service", RFC-778, COMSAT
       Laboratories, April 1981.

   9.  Su, Z., "A Specification of the Internet Protocol (IP) Timestamp
       Option", RFC-781, SRI International, May 1981.

   10. Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency, "Internet Protocol",
       RFC-791, USC/Information Sciences Institute, September 1981.

   11. Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency, "Internet Control
       Message Protocol", RFC-792, USC/Information Sciences Institute,
       September 1981.

   12. Postel, J., "Daytime Protocol", RFC-867, USC/Information Sciences
       Institute, May 1983.

   13. Postel, J., "Time Protocol", RFC-868, USC/Information Sciences
       Institute, May 1983.

   14. Mills, D., "Internet Delay Experiments", RFC-889, M/A-COM
       Linkabit, December 1983.



Mills                                                          [Page 40]

RFC 1059                 Network Time Protocol                 July 1988


   15. Mills, D., "DCN Local-Network Protocols", RFC-891, M/A-COM
       Linkabit, December 1983.

   16. Gusella, R., and S. Zatti, "TEMPO - A Network Time Controller for
       a Distributed Berkeley UNIX System", IEEE Distributed Processing
       Technical Committee Newsletter 6, No. SI-2, pgs. 7-15, June 1984.
       Also in: Proc.  Summer 1984 USENIX, Salt Lake City, June 1984.

   17. Halpern, J., Simons, B., Strong, R., and D. Dolly, "Fault-
       Tolerant Clock Synchronization", Proc. Third Annual ACM Symposium
       on Principles of Distributed Computing, pgs. 89-102, August 1984.

   18. Lundelius, J., and N. Lynch, "A New Fault-Tolerant Algorithm for
       Clock Synchronization:, Proc. Third Annual ACM Symposium on
       Principles of Distributed Computing, pgs. 75-88, August 1984.

   19. Lamport, L., and P. Melliar-Smith "Synchronizing Clocks in the
       Presence of Faults", JACM 32, No. 1, pgs. 52-78, January 1985.

   20. Gusella, R., and S. Zatti, "The Berkeley UNIX 4.3BSD Time
       Synchronization Protocol: Protocol Specification", Technical
       Report UCB/CSD 85/250, University of California, Berkeley, June
       1985.

   21. Marzullo, K., and S. Owicki, "Maintaining the Time in a
       Distributed System", ACM Operating Systems Review 19, No. 3, pgs.
       44-54, July 1985.

   22. Mills, D., "Algorithms for Synchronizing Network Clocks", RFC-
       956, M/A-COM Linkabit, September 1985.

   23. Mills, D., "Experiments in Network Clock Synchronization", RFC-
       957, M/A-COM Linkabit, September 1985.

   24. Mills, D., "Network Time Protocol (NTP)", RFC-958, M/A-COM
       Linkabit, September 1985.

   25. Gusella, R., and S. Zatti, "An Election Algorithm for a
       Distributed Clock Synchronization Program", Technical Report
       UCB/CSD 86/275, University of California, Berkeley, December
       1985.

   26. Sams, H., "Reference Data for Engineers:  Radio, Electronics,
       Computer and Communications (Seventh Edition)", Indianapolis,
       1985.

   27. Schneider, F., "A Paradigm for Reliable Clock Synchronization",
       Technical Report TR 86-735, Cornell University, February 1986.



Mills                                                          [Page 41]

RFC 1059                 Network Time Protocol                 July 1988


   28. Tripathi, S., and S. Chang, "ETempo:  A Clock Synchronization
       Algorithm for Hierarchical LANs - Implementation and
       Measurements", Systems Research Center Technical Report TR-86-48,
       University of Maryland, 1986.

   29. Bertsekas, D., and R.  Gallager, "Data Networks", Prentice-Hall,
       Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1987.

   30. Srikanth, T., and S. Toueg. "Optimal Clock Synchronization", JACM
       34, No. 3, pgs. 626-645, July 1987.

   31. Rickert, N., "Non Byzantine Clock Synchronization - A Programming
       Experiment", ACM Operating Systems Review 22, No. 1, pgs. 73-78,
       January 1988.





































Mills                                                          [Page 42]

RFC 1059                 Network Time Protocol                 July 1988


Appendix A.  UDP Header Format

   An NTP packet consists of the UDP header followed by the NTP data
   portion.  The format of the UDP header and the interpretation of its
   fields are described in [6] and are not part of the NTP
   specification.  They are shown below for completeness.

    0                   1                   2                   3
    0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
   |          Source Port          |       Destination Port        |
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
   |            Length             |           Checksum            |
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

   Source Port

          UDP source port number. In the case of a client request this
          field is assigned by the client host, while for a server reply
          it is copied from the Destination Port field of the client
          request. In the case of symmetric mode, both the Source Port
          and Destination Port fields are assigned the NTP service-port
          number 123.

   Destination Port

          UDP destination port number. In the case of a client request
          this field is assigned the NTP service-port number 123, while
          for a server reply it is copied from the Source Port field of
          the client request. In the case of symmetric mode, both the
          Source Port and Destination Port fields are assigned the NTP
          service-port number 123.

   Length

          Length of the request or reply, including UDP header, in
          octets

   Checksum

          Standard UDP checksum










Mills                                                          [Page 43]

RFC 1059                 Network Time Protocol                 July 1988


Appendix B.  NTP Data Format - Version 1

   The format of the NTP data portion, which immediately follows the UDP
   header, is shown below along with a description of its fields.


    0                   1                   2                   3
    0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
   |LI | VN  |0 0 0|    Stratum    |      Poll     |   Precision   |
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
   |                     Synchronizing Distance                    |
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
   |                     Estimated Drift Rate                      |
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
   |                  Reference Clock Identifier                   |
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
   |                                                               |
   |                 Reference Timestamp (64 bits)                 |
   |                                                               |
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
   |                                                               |
   |                 Originate Timestamp (64 bits)                 |
   |                                                               |
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
   |                                                               |
   |                  Receive Timestamp (64 bits)                  |
   |                                                               |
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
   |                                                               |
   |                  Transmit Timestamp (64 bits)                 |
   |                                                               |
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

   Leap Indicator (LI)

          Two-bit code warning of impending leap-second to be inserted
          at the end of the last day of the current month. Bits are
          coded as follows:

                    00      no warning
                    01      +1 second (following minute has 61 seconds)
                    10      -1 second (following minute has 59 seconds)
                    11      alarm condition (clock not synchronized)







Mills                                                          [Page 44]

RFC 1059                 Network Time Protocol                 July 1988


   Version Number (VN)

          Three-bit code indicating the version number, currently one
          (1).

   Reserved

          Three-bit field consisting of all zeros and reserved for
          future use.

   Stratum

          Integer identifying stratum level of local clock. Values are
          defined as follows:

                    0       unspecified
                    1       primary reference (e.g., radio clock)
                    2...n   secondary reference (via NTP)

   Poll

          Signed integer indicating the maximum interval between
          successive messages, in seconds to the nearest power of two.

   Precision

          Signed integer indicating the precision of the local clock, in
          seconds to the nearest power of two.

   Synchronizing Distance

          Fixed-point number indicating the estimated roundtrip delay to
          the primary synchronizing source, in seconds with fraction
          point between bits 15 and 16.

   Estimated Drift Rate

          Fixed-point number indicating the estimated drift rate of the
          local clock, in dimensionless units with fraction point to the
          left of the most significant bit.

   Reference Clock Identifier

          Code identifying the particular reference clock. In the case
          of type 0 (unspecified) or type 1 (primary reference), this is
          a left-justified, zero-filled ASCII string, for example:





Mills                                                          [Page 45]

RFC 1059                 Network Time Protocol                 July 1988


                    Type    Code    Meaning
                    ---------------------------------------------------
                    0       DCN     Determined by DCN routing algorithm
                    1       WWVB    WWVB radio clock (60 kHz)
                    1       GOES    GOES satellite clock (468 MHz)
                    1       WWV     WWV radio clock (5/10/15 MHz)
                    (and others as necessary)

          In the case of type 2 and greater (secondary reference), this
          is the 32-bit Internet address of the reference host.

   Reference Timestamp

          Local time at which the local clock was last set or corrected.

   Originate Timestamp

          Local time at which the request departed the client host for
          the service host.

   Receive Timestamp

          Local time at which the request arrived at the service host.

   Transmit Timestamp

          Local time at which the reply departed the service host for
          the client host.























Mills                                                          [Page 46]

RFC 1059                 Network Time Protocol                 July 1988


Appendix C.  Timeteller Experiments

   In order to update data collected in June 1985 and reported in RFC-
   957, a glorious three-day experiment was carried out in January 1988
   with all the hosts and gateways listed in the NIC data base.  Four
   packets were sent at five-second intervals to each host and gateway
   using UDP/NTP, UDP/TIME and ICMP/TIMESTAMP protocols and the clock
   offsets (in milliseconds) for each protocol averaged with respect to
   local time, which is synchronized via NTP to a radio-clock host.
   While the ICMP/TIMESTAMP protocol has much finer granularity
   (milliseconds) than UDP/TIME (seconds), it has no provisions for the
   date, so is not suitable as a time-synchronization protocol;
   however, it was included in the experiments both as a sanity check
   and in order to assess the precision of measurement.

   In the latest survey of 5498 hosts and 224 gateways, 46 responded to
   UDP/NTP requests, 1158 to UDP/TIME and 1963 to ICMP/TIMESTAMP.  By
   contrast, in the 1985 survey of 1775 hosts and 110 gateways, 163
   responded to UDP/TIME requests and 504 to ICMP/TIMESTAMP.  At that
   time there were no UDP/NTP implementations.  There are many more
   hosts and gateways listed in the rapidly growing domain-name system,
   but not listed in the NIC data base, and therefore not surveyed.  The
   results of the survey are given in Table C.1, which shows for each of
   the three protocols the error X for which the distribution function
   P[x =< X] has the value shown.

           P[x=<X] UDP/NTP         UDP/TIME        ICMP/TIMESTAMP
           ------------------------------------------------------
           .1      11              4632            5698
           .2      37              18238           27965
           .3      66              38842           68596
           .4      177             68213           127367
           .5      364             126232          201908
           .6      567             195950          285092
           .7      3466            267119          525509
           .8      20149           422129          2.91426E+06
           .9      434634          807135          5.02336E+07
           1       1.17971E+09     1.59524E+09     2.11591E+09

                     Table C.1. Distribution Functions

   It can be seen that ten percent of the UDP/NTP responses show errors
   of 11 milliseconds or less and that ten percent of the UDP/TIME
   responses show errors greater than 807135 milliseconds (about 13
   minutes).  Fifty percent of the UDP/NTP timetellers are within 364
   milliseconds, while fifty percent of the UDP/TIME tellers are within
   126232 milliseconds (just over two minutes).  Surprisingly,
   ICMP/TIMESTAMP responses show errors even larger than UDP/TIME.



Mills                                                          [Page 47]

RFC 1059                 Network Time Protocol                 July 1988


   However, the maximum error shown in all three protocols exceeded the
   range that could be recorded, in this case about 12 days.  Clearly,
   there are good timetellers and bad.
















































Mills                                                          [Page 48]

RFC 1059                 Network Time Protocol                 July 1988


Appendix D.  Evaluation of Filtering Algorithms

   A number of algorithms for deglitching and filtering time-offset data
   were described in RFC-956.  These fall in two classes:  majority-
   subset algorithms, which attempt to separate good subsets from bad by
   comparing their means, and clustering algorithms, which attempt to
   improve the estimate by repeatedly casting out outlyers.  The former
   class was suggested as a technique to select the best (i.e.  the most
   reliable) clocks from a population, while the latter class was
   suggested as a technique to improve the offset estimate for a single
   clock given a series of observations.

   Following publication of RFC-956 and after further development and
   experimentation using typical Internet paths, a better algorithm was
   found for casting out outlyers from a continuous stream of offset
   observations spaced at intervals in the order of minutes.  The
   algorithm is described as a variant of a median filter, in which a
   window consisting of the last n sample offsets is continuously
   updated and the median sample selected as the estimate.  However, in
   the modified algorithm the outlyer (sample furthest from the median)
   is then discarded and the entire process repeated until only a single
   sample offset is left, which is then selected as the estimate.

   The modified algorithm was found to be more resistant to glitches and
   to provide a more accurate estimate than the unmodified one.  It has
   been implemented in the NTP daemons developed for the Fuzzball and
   Unix operating systems and been in regular operation for about two
   years.  However, recent experiments have shown there is an even
   better one which provides comparable accuracy together with a much
   lower computational burden.  The key to the new algorithm became
   evident through an examination of scatter diagrams plotting sample
   offset versus roundtrip delay.

   To see how a scatter diagram is constructed, it will be useful to
   consider how offsets and delays are computed.  Number the times of
   sending and receiving NTP messages as shown in Figure D.1 and let i
   be an even integer.  Then the timestamps t(i-3), t(i-2) and t(i-1)
   and t(i) are sufficient to calculate the offset and delay of each
   peer relative to the other.












Mills                                                          [Page 49]

RFC 1059                 Network Time Protocol                 July 1988


                   Peer 1                    Peer 2
                        |                    |
                   t(1) |------------------->| t(2)
                        |                    |
                   t(4) |<-------------------| t(3)
                        |                    |
                   t(5) |------------------->| t(6)
                        |                    |
                   t(8) |<-------------------| t(7)
                        |                    |
                                 ...

                 Figure D.1. Calculating Delay and Offset

   The roundtrip delay d and clock offset c of the receiving peer
   relative to the sending peer are:


                   d = (t(i) - t(i-3)) - (t(i-1) - t(i-2))
                c = [(t(i-2) - t(i-3)) + (t(i-1) - t(i))]/2 .

   Two implicit assumptions in the above are that the delay distribution
   is independent of direction and that the intrinsic drift rates of the
   client and server clocks are small and close to the same value.  If
   this is the case the scatter diagram would show the samples
   concentrated about a horizontal line extending from the point (d,c)
   to the right.  However, this is not generally the case.  The typical
   diagram shows the samples dispersed in a wedge with apex (d,c) and
   opening to the right.  The limits of the wedge are determined by
   lines extending from (d,c) with slopes +0.5 and -0.5, which
   correspond to the locus of points as the delay in one direction
   increases while the delay in the other direction does not.  In some
   cases the points are concentrated along these two extrema lines, with
   relatively few points remaining within the opening of the wedge,
   which would correspond to increased delays on both directions.

   Upon reflection, the reason for the particular dispersion shown in
   the scatter diagram is obvious.  Packet-switching nets are most often
   operated with relatively small mean queue lengths in the order of
   one, which means the queues are often idle for relatively long
   periods.  In addition, the routing algorithm most often operates to
   minimize the number of packet-switch hops and thus the number of
   queues.  Thus, not only is the probability that an arriving NTP
   packet finds a busy queue in one direction reasonably low, but the
   probability of it finding a busy queue in both directions is even
   lower.

   From the above discussion one would expect that, at low utilizations



Mills                                                          [Page 50]

RFC 1059                 Network Time Protocol                 July 1988


   and hop counts the points should be concentrated about the apex of
   the wedge and begin to extend rightward along the extrema lines as
   the utilizations and hop counts increase.  As the utilizations and
   hop counts continue to increase, the points should begin to fill in
   the wedge as it expands even further rightward.  This behavior is in
   fact what is observed on typical Internet paths involving ARPANET,
   NSFNET and other nets.

   These observations cast doubt on the median-filter approach as a good
   way to cast out offset outlyers and suggests another approach which
   might be called a minimum filter.  From the scatter diagrams it is
   obvious that the best offset samples occur at the lower delays.
   Therefore, an appropriate technique would be simply to select from
   the n most recent samples the sample with lowest delay and use its
   associated offset as the estimate.  An experiment was designed to
   test this technique using measurements between selected hosts
   equipped with radio clocks, so that delays and offsets could be
   determined independent of the measurement procedure itself.

   The raw delays and offsets were measured by NTP from hosts at U
   Maryland (UMD) and U Delaware (UDEL) via net paths to each other and
   other hosts at Ford Research (FORD), Information Sciences Institute
   (ISI) and National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR).  For the
   purposes here, all hosts can be assumed synchronized to within a few
   milliseconds to NBS time, so that the delays and offsets reflect only
   the net paths themselves.

   The results of the measurements are given in Table D.1 (UMD) and
   Table D.2 (UDEL), which show for each of the paths the error X for
   which the distribution function P[x =< X] has the value shown.  Note
   that the values of the distribution function are shown by intervals
   of decreasing size as the function increases, so that its behavior in
   the interesting regime of low error probability can be more
   accurately determined.

















Mills                                                          [Page 51]

RFC 1059                 Network Time Protocol                 July 1988


    UMD    FORD    ISI     NCAR          UMD    FORD    ISI     NCAR
    Delay  1525    2174    1423          Offset 1525    2174    1423
    ---------------------------          ---------------------------
    .1     493     688     176           .1     2       17      1
    .2     494     748     179           .2     4       33      2
    .3     495     815     187           .3     9       62      3
    .4     495     931     205           .4     18      96      8
    .5     497     1013    224           .5     183     127     13
    .6     503     1098    243           .6     4.88E+8 151     20
    .7     551     1259    265           .7     4.88E+8 195     26
    .8     725     1658    293           .8     4.88E+8 347     35
    .9     968     2523    335           .9     4.88E+8 775     53
    .99    1409    6983    472           .99    4.88E+8 2785    114
    .999   14800   11464   22731         .999   4.88E+8 5188    11279
    1      18395   15892   25647         1      4.88E+8 6111    12733

              Table D.1. Delay and Offset Measurements (UMD)

           UDEL   FORD    UMD     ISI     NCAR
           Delay  2986    3442    3215    2756
           -----------------------------------
           .1     650     222     411     476
           .2     666     231     436     512
           .3     692     242     471     554
           .4     736     256     529     594
           .5     787     272     618     648
           .6     873     298     681     710
           .7     1013    355     735     815
           .8     1216    532     845     1011
           .9     1836    1455    1019    1992
           .99    4690    3920    1562    4334
           .999   15371   6132    2387    11234
           1      21984   8942    4483    21427

                   Table D.2.a Delay Measurements (UDEL)
















Mills                                                          [Page 52]

RFC 1059                 Network Time Protocol                 July 1988


           UDEL   FORD    UMD     ISI     NCAR
           Offset 2986    3442    3215    2756
           -----------------------------------
           .1     83      2       16      12
           .2     96      5       27      24
           .3     108     9       36      36
           .4     133     13      48      51
           .5     173     20      67      69
           .6     254     30      93      93
           .7     429     51      130     133
           .8     1824    133     165     215
           .9     4.88E+8 582     221     589
           .99    4.88E+8 1757    539     1640
           .999   4.88E+8 2945    929     5278
           1      5.63E+8 4374    1263    10425

                  Table D.2.b Offset Measurements (UDEL)

   The results suggest that accuracies less than a few seconds can
   usually be achieved for all but one percent of the measurements, but
   that accuracies degrade drastically when the remaining measurements
   are included.  Note that in the case of the UMD measurements to FORD
   almost half the measurements showed gross errors, which was due to
   equipment failure at that site.  These data were intentionally left
   in the sample set to see how well the algorithms dealt with the
   problem.

   The next two tables compare the results of minimum filters (Table
   D.3) and median filters (Table D.4) for various n when presented with
   the UMD - - NCAR raw sample data.  The results show consistently
   lower errors for the minimum filter when compared with the median
   filter of nearest value of n.  Perhaps the most dramatic result of
   both filters is the greatly reduced error at the upper end of the
   range.  In fact, using either filter with n at least three results in
   no errors greater than 100 milliseconds.
















Mills                                                          [Page 53]

RFC 1059                 Network Time Protocol                 July 1988


                           Filter Samples
                   1       2       4       8       16
           P[x=<X] 1423    1422    1422    1420    1416
           - --------------------------------------------
            .1     1       1       1       0       0
            .2     2       1       1       1       1
            .3     3       2       1       1       1
            .4     8       2       2       1       1
            .5     13      5       2       2       1
            .6     20      10      3       2       2
            .7     26      15      6       2       2
            .8     35      23      11      4       2
            .9     53      33      20      9       3
            .99    114     62      43      28      23
            .999   11279   82      57      37      23
            1      12733   108     59      37      23

                         Table D.3. Minimum Filter
                               (UMD - NCAR)

                           Filter Samples
                           3       7       15
                   P[x=<X] 1423    1423    1423
                     ----------------------------
                    .1     2       2       2
                    .2     2       4       5
                    .3     5       8       8
                    .4     10      11      11
                    .5     13      14      14
                    .6     18      17      16
                    .7     23      21      19
                    .8     28      25      23
                    .9     36      30      27
                    .99    64      46      35
                    .999   82      53      44
                    1      82      60      44

                         Table D.4. Median Filter
                               (UMD - NCAR)

   While the UMD - NCAR data above represented a path across the NSFNET
   Backbone, which normally involves only a few hops via Ethernets and
   56-Kbps links, the UDEL - NCAR path involves additional ARPANET hops,
   which can contribute substantial additional delay dispersion.  The
   following Table D.5.  shows the results of a minimum filter for
   various n when presented with the UDEL - NCAR raw sample data.  The
   range of error is markedly greater than the UMD - NCAR path above,
   especially near the upper end of the distribution function.



Mills                                                          [Page 54]

RFC 1059                 Network Time Protocol                 July 1988


                                Filter Samples
                        1       2       4       8       16
                P[x=<X] 2756    2755    2755    2753    2749
                --------------------------------------------
                 .1     12      9       8       7       6
                 .2     24      19      16      14      14
                 .3     36      27      22      20      19
                 .4     51      36      29      25      23
                 .5     69      47      36      30      27
                 .6     93      61      44      35      32
                 .7     133     80      56      43      35
                 .8     215     112     75      53      43
                 .9     589     199     111     76      63
                 .99    1640    1002    604     729     315
                 .999   5278    1524    884     815     815
                 1      10425   5325    991     835     815

                   Table D.5. Minimum Filter (UDEL - NCAR)

   Based on these data, the minimum filter was selected as the standard
   algorithm.  Since its performance did not seem to much improve for
   values of n above eight, this value was chosen as the standard.
   Network Time Protocol (Version 1): Specification and Implementation.




























Mills                                                          [Page 55]

RFC 1059                 Network Time Protocol                 July 1988


Appendix E.  NTP Synchronization Networks

   This section discusses net configuration issues for implementing a
   ubiquitous NTP service in the Internet system.  Section E.1 describes
   the NTP primary service net now in operation, including an analysis
   of failure scenarios.  Section E.2 suggests how secondary service
   nets, which obtain wholesale time from the primary service net, can
   be configured to deliver accurate and reliable retail time to the
   general host population.

E.1.  Primary Service Network

   The primary service net consists of five primary servers, each of
   which is synchronized via radio or satellite to a national time
   standard and thus operates at stratum one.  Each server consists of
   an LSI-11 Fuzzball, a WWVB or GOES radio clock and one or more net
   interfaces.  Some servers provide switching and gateway services as
   well.  Table E.1 shows the name, Internet address, type of clock,
   operating institution and identifying code.

Name          Address         Clock   Operating Institution and (Code)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
DCN5.ARPA     128.4.0.5       WWVB    U Delaware, Newark, DE (UDEL)
FORD1.ARPA    128.5.0.1       GOES    Ford Research, Dearborn, MI
                                        (FORD)
NCAR.NSF.NET  128.116.64.3    WWVB    National Center for Atmospheric
                                        Research, Boulder, CO (NCAR)
UMD1.UMD.EDU  128.8.10.1      WWVB    U Maryland, College Park, MD
                                        (UMD)
WWVB.ISI.EDU  128.9.2.129     WWVB    USC Information Sciences
                                        Institute, Marina del Rey, CA
                                        (ISI)

                       Table E.1. Primary Servers

   Figure E.1 shows how the five primary servers are interconnected as
   NTP peers.  Note that each server actively probes two other servers
   (along the direction of the arrows), which means these probes will
   continue even if one or both of the two probed servers are down.  On
   the other hand, each server is probed by two other servers, so that
   the result, assuming all servers are up, is that every server peers
   with every other server.









Mills                                                          [Page 56]

RFC 1059                 Network Time Protocol                 July 1988


               +------------------------------------------------+
               V                                                |
           +--------+              +--------+              +--------+
           |        |<-------------|        |<-------------|        |
           |  NCAR  |              |  ISI   |              |  FORD  |
           |        |----+      +--|        |<--+    +---->|        |
           +--------+    |      |  +--------+   |    |     +--------+
               |         |      |               |    |          A
               |     +---|------|---------------|----+          |
               |     |   |      |               |               |
               |     |   +------|---------------|---------+     |
               |     |          |               |         |     |
               |     |          |               |         V     |
               |   +--------+   |               |  +--------+   |
               |   |        |<--+               +--|        |   |
               +-->|  UMD   |                      |  UDEL  |---+
                   |        |--------------------->|        |
                   +--------+                      +--------+

                    Figure E.1. Primary Service Network

   All of the five primary servers shown are directly connected to a
   radio clock and thus normally operate at stratum one.  However, if
   the radio clock itself becomes disabled or the propagation path to
   its synchronizing source fails, then the server drops to stratum two
   and synchronizes via NTP with its neighbor at the smallest
   synchronizing distance.  If a radio clock appears to operate
   correctly but delivers incorrect time (falseticker), the server may
   remain synchronized to the clock.  However, gross discrepancies will
   become apparent via the NTP peer paths, which will ordinarily result
   in an operator alarm.

   Assume that, if a radio clock appears up, it is a truechimer;
   otherwise, the clock appears down.  Then the above configuration will
   continue to provide correct time at all primary servers as long as at
   least one radio clock is up, all servers are up and the servers
   remain connected to each other through the net.  The fact that the
   graph and all of its subgraphs are completely connected lends an
   incredible resilience to the configuration.

   If some radio clocks appear up but are in fact falsetickers, the
   primary servers connected to those clocks will not provide correct
   time.  However, as the consequents of the voting procedure and
   complete connectivity of the graph and its subgraphs, any combination
   of two falsetickers or of one falseticker and one down server will be
   detected by their truechimer neighbors.





Mills                                                          [Page 57]

RFC 1059                 Network Time Protocol                 July 1988


E.2.  Secondary Service Networks

   A secondary server operating at stratum n > 1 ordinarily obtains
   synchronization using at least three peer paths, two with servers at
   stratum n-1 and one or more with servers at stratum n.  In the most
   robust configurations a set of servers agree to provide backup
   service for each other, so distribute some of their peer paths over
   stratum-(n-1) servers and others over stratum-n servers in the same
   set.  For instance, in the case of a stratum-2 service net with two
   secondary servers and the primary service net of Figure E.1, there
   are five possible configurations where each stratum-1 path ends on a
   different primary server.  Such configurations can survive the loss
   of three out of the four stratum-1 servers or net paths and will
   reject a single falseticker on one of the two stratum-1 paths for
   each server.

   Ordinary hosts can obtain retail time from primary or secondary
   service net using NTP in client/server mode, which does not require
   dedicated server resources as does symmetric mode.  It is anticipated
   that ordinary hosts will be quite close to a secondary server,
   perhaps on the same cable or local net, so that the frequency of NTP
   request messages need only be high enough, perhaps one per hour or
   two, to trim the drift from the local clock.




























Mills                                                          [Page 58]