File: rfc1134.txt

package info (click to toggle)
doc-rfc 20181229-2
  • links: PTS, VCS
  • area: non-free
  • in suites: buster
  • size: 570,944 kB
  • sloc: xml: 285,646; sh: 107; python: 90; perl: 42; makefile: 14
file content (2131 lines) | stat: -rw-r--r-- 85,222 bytes parent folder | download | duplicates (8)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
543
544
545
546
547
548
549
550
551
552
553
554
555
556
557
558
559
560
561
562
563
564
565
566
567
568
569
570
571
572
573
574
575
576
577
578
579
580
581
582
583
584
585
586
587
588
589
590
591
592
593
594
595
596
597
598
599
600
601
602
603
604
605
606
607
608
609
610
611
612
613
614
615
616
617
618
619
620
621
622
623
624
625
626
627
628
629
630
631
632
633
634
635
636
637
638
639
640
641
642
643
644
645
646
647
648
649
650
651
652
653
654
655
656
657
658
659
660
661
662
663
664
665
666
667
668
669
670
671
672
673
674
675
676
677
678
679
680
681
682
683
684
685
686
687
688
689
690
691
692
693
694
695
696
697
698
699
700
701
702
703
704
705
706
707
708
709
710
711
712
713
714
715
716
717
718
719
720
721
722
723
724
725
726
727
728
729
730
731
732
733
734
735
736
737
738
739
740
741
742
743
744
745
746
747
748
749
750
751
752
753
754
755
756
757
758
759
760
761
762
763
764
765
766
767
768
769
770
771
772
773
774
775
776
777
778
779
780
781
782
783
784
785
786
787
788
789
790
791
792
793
794
795
796
797
798
799
800
801
802
803
804
805
806
807
808
809
810
811
812
813
814
815
816
817
818
819
820
821
822
823
824
825
826
827
828
829
830
831
832
833
834
835
836
837
838
839
840
841
842
843
844
845
846
847
848
849
850
851
852
853
854
855
856
857
858
859
860
861
862
863
864
865
866
867
868
869
870
871
872
873
874
875
876
877
878
879
880
881
882
883
884
885
886
887
888
889
890
891
892
893
894
895
896
897
898
899
900
901
902
903
904
905
906
907
908
909
910
911
912
913
914
915
916
917
918
919
920
921
922
923
924
925
926
927
928
929
930
931
932
933
934
935
936
937
938
939
940
941
942
943
944
945
946
947
948
949
950
951
952
953
954
955
956
957
958
959
960
961
962
963
964
965
966
967
968
969
970
971
972
973
974
975
976
977
978
979
980
981
982
983
984
985
986
987
988
989
990
991
992
993
994
995
996
997
998
999
1000
1001
1002
1003
1004
1005
1006
1007
1008
1009
1010
1011
1012
1013
1014
1015
1016
1017
1018
1019
1020
1021
1022
1023
1024
1025
1026
1027
1028
1029
1030
1031
1032
1033
1034
1035
1036
1037
1038
1039
1040
1041
1042
1043
1044
1045
1046
1047
1048
1049
1050
1051
1052
1053
1054
1055
1056
1057
1058
1059
1060
1061
1062
1063
1064
1065
1066
1067
1068
1069
1070
1071
1072
1073
1074
1075
1076
1077
1078
1079
1080
1081
1082
1083
1084
1085
1086
1087
1088
1089
1090
1091
1092
1093
1094
1095
1096
1097
1098
1099
1100
1101
1102
1103
1104
1105
1106
1107
1108
1109
1110
1111
1112
1113
1114
1115
1116
1117
1118
1119
1120
1121
1122
1123
1124
1125
1126
1127
1128
1129
1130
1131
1132
1133
1134
1135
1136
1137
1138
1139
1140
1141
1142
1143
1144
1145
1146
1147
1148
1149
1150
1151
1152
1153
1154
1155
1156
1157
1158
1159
1160
1161
1162
1163
1164
1165
1166
1167
1168
1169
1170
1171
1172
1173
1174
1175
1176
1177
1178
1179
1180
1181
1182
1183
1184
1185
1186
1187
1188
1189
1190
1191
1192
1193
1194
1195
1196
1197
1198
1199
1200
1201
1202
1203
1204
1205
1206
1207
1208
1209
1210
1211
1212
1213
1214
1215
1216
1217
1218
1219
1220
1221
1222
1223
1224
1225
1226
1227
1228
1229
1230
1231
1232
1233
1234
1235
1236
1237
1238
1239
1240
1241
1242
1243
1244
1245
1246
1247
1248
1249
1250
1251
1252
1253
1254
1255
1256
1257
1258
1259
1260
1261
1262
1263
1264
1265
1266
1267
1268
1269
1270
1271
1272
1273
1274
1275
1276
1277
1278
1279
1280
1281
1282
1283
1284
1285
1286
1287
1288
1289
1290
1291
1292
1293
1294
1295
1296
1297
1298
1299
1300
1301
1302
1303
1304
1305
1306
1307
1308
1309
1310
1311
1312
1313
1314
1315
1316
1317
1318
1319
1320
1321
1322
1323
1324
1325
1326
1327
1328
1329
1330
1331
1332
1333
1334
1335
1336
1337
1338
1339
1340
1341
1342
1343
1344
1345
1346
1347
1348
1349
1350
1351
1352
1353
1354
1355
1356
1357
1358
1359
1360
1361
1362
1363
1364
1365
1366
1367
1368
1369
1370
1371
1372
1373
1374
1375
1376
1377
1378
1379
1380
1381
1382
1383
1384
1385
1386
1387
1388
1389
1390
1391
1392
1393
1394
1395
1396
1397
1398
1399
1400
1401
1402
1403
1404
1405
1406
1407
1408
1409
1410
1411
1412
1413
1414
1415
1416
1417
1418
1419
1420
1421
1422
1423
1424
1425
1426
1427
1428
1429
1430
1431
1432
1433
1434
1435
1436
1437
1438
1439
1440
1441
1442
1443
1444
1445
1446
1447
1448
1449
1450
1451
1452
1453
1454
1455
1456
1457
1458
1459
1460
1461
1462
1463
1464
1465
1466
1467
1468
1469
1470
1471
1472
1473
1474
1475
1476
1477
1478
1479
1480
1481
1482
1483
1484
1485
1486
1487
1488
1489
1490
1491
1492
1493
1494
1495
1496
1497
1498
1499
1500
1501
1502
1503
1504
1505
1506
1507
1508
1509
1510
1511
1512
1513
1514
1515
1516
1517
1518
1519
1520
1521
1522
1523
1524
1525
1526
1527
1528
1529
1530
1531
1532
1533
1534
1535
1536
1537
1538
1539
1540
1541
1542
1543
1544
1545
1546
1547
1548
1549
1550
1551
1552
1553
1554
1555
1556
1557
1558
1559
1560
1561
1562
1563
1564
1565
1566
1567
1568
1569
1570
1571
1572
1573
1574
1575
1576
1577
1578
1579
1580
1581
1582
1583
1584
1585
1586
1587
1588
1589
1590
1591
1592
1593
1594
1595
1596
1597
1598
1599
1600
1601
1602
1603
1604
1605
1606
1607
1608
1609
1610
1611
1612
1613
1614
1615
1616
1617
1618
1619
1620
1621
1622
1623
1624
1625
1626
1627
1628
1629
1630
1631
1632
1633
1634
1635
1636
1637
1638
1639
1640
1641
1642
1643
1644
1645
1646
1647
1648
1649
1650
1651
1652
1653
1654
1655
1656
1657
1658
1659
1660
1661
1662
1663
1664
1665
1666
1667
1668
1669
1670
1671
1672
1673
1674
1675
1676
1677
1678
1679
1680
1681
1682
1683
1684
1685
1686
1687
1688
1689
1690
1691
1692
1693
1694
1695
1696
1697
1698
1699
1700
1701
1702
1703
1704
1705
1706
1707
1708
1709
1710
1711
1712
1713
1714
1715
1716
1717
1718
1719
1720
1721
1722
1723
1724
1725
1726
1727
1728
1729
1730
1731
1732
1733
1734
1735
1736
1737
1738
1739
1740
1741
1742
1743
1744
1745
1746
1747
1748
1749
1750
1751
1752
1753
1754
1755
1756
1757
1758
1759
1760
1761
1762
1763
1764
1765
1766
1767
1768
1769
1770
1771
1772
1773
1774
1775
1776
1777
1778
1779
1780
1781
1782
1783
1784
1785
1786
1787
1788
1789
1790
1791
1792
1793
1794
1795
1796
1797
1798
1799
1800
1801
1802
1803
1804
1805
1806
1807
1808
1809
1810
1811
1812
1813
1814
1815
1816
1817
1818
1819
1820
1821
1822
1823
1824
1825
1826
1827
1828
1829
1830
1831
1832
1833
1834
1835
1836
1837
1838
1839
1840
1841
1842
1843
1844
1845
1846
1847
1848
1849
1850
1851
1852
1853
1854
1855
1856
1857
1858
1859
1860
1861
1862
1863
1864
1865
1866
1867
1868
1869
1870
1871
1872
1873
1874
1875
1876
1877
1878
1879
1880
1881
1882
1883
1884
1885
1886
1887
1888
1889
1890
1891
1892
1893
1894
1895
1896
1897
1898
1899
1900
1901
1902
1903
1904
1905
1906
1907
1908
1909
1910
1911
1912
1913
1914
1915
1916
1917
1918
1919
1920
1921
1922
1923
1924
1925
1926
1927
1928
1929
1930
1931
1932
1933
1934
1935
1936
1937
1938
1939
1940
1941
1942
1943
1944
1945
1946
1947
1948
1949
1950
1951
1952
1953
1954
1955
1956
1957
1958
1959
1960
1961
1962
1963
1964
1965
1966
1967
1968
1969
1970
1971
1972
1973
1974
1975
1976
1977
1978
1979
1980
1981
1982
1983
1984
1985
1986
1987
1988
1989
1990
1991
1992
1993
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
2026
2027
2028
2029
2030
2031
2032
2033
2034
2035
2036
2037
2038
2039
2040
2041
2042
2043
2044
2045
2046
2047
2048
2049
2050
2051
2052
2053
2054
2055
2056
2057
2058
2059
2060
2061
2062
2063
2064
2065
2066
2067
2068
2069
2070
2071
2072
2073
2074
2075
2076
2077
2078
2079
2080
2081
2082
2083
2084
2085
2086
2087
2088
2089
2090
2091
2092
2093
2094
2095
2096
2097
2098
2099
2100
2101
2102
2103
2104
2105
2106
2107
2108
2109
2110
2111
2112
2113
2114
2115
2116
2117
2118
2119
2120
2121
2122
2123
2124
2125
2126
2127
2128
2129
2130
2131






Network Working Group                                         D. Perkins
Request for Comments: 1134                                           CMU
                                                           November 1989


       The Point-to-Point Protocol: A Proposal for Multi-Protocol
          Transmission of Datagrams Over Point-to-Point Links


                           Table of Contents

   Status of this Memo ...................................    2
   Abstract ..............................................    2
   1. Introduction .......................................    2
   1.1 Motivation ........................................    2
   1.2 Overview of PPP ...................................    3
   1.3 Organization of the document ......................    4
   2. Physical Layer Requirements ........................    4
   3. The Data Link Layer ................................    4
   3.1 Frame Format ......................................    5
   4. The PPP Link Control Protocol (LCP) ................    8
   4.1 The LCP Automaton .................................    9
   4.1.1 Overview ........................................    9
   4.1.2 State Diagram ...................................   10
   4.1.3 State Transition Table ..........................   12
   4.1.4 Events ..........................................   12
   4.1.5 Actions .........................................   14
   4.1.6 States ..........................................   16
   4.2 Loop Avoidance ....................................   19
   4.3 Packet Format .....................................   19
   4.3.1 Configure-Request ...............................   21
   4.3.2 Configure-Ack ...................................   21
   4.3.3 Configure-Nak ...................................   22
   4.3.4 Configure-Reject ................................   24
   4.3.5 Terminate-Request and Terminate-Ack .............   25
   4.3.6 Code-Reject .....................................   26
   4.3.7 Protocol-Reject .................................   27
   4.3.8 Echo-Request and Echo-Reply .....................   28
   4.3.9 Discard-Request .................................   29
   4.4 Configuration Options .............................   30
   4.4.1 Format ..........................................   31
   5. A PPP Network Control Protocol (NCP) for IP ........   32
   5.1 Sending IP Datagrams ..............................   33
   APPENDICES ............................................   33
   A. Asynchronous HDLC ..................................   33
   B. Fast Frame Check Sequence (FCS) Implementation .....   35
   B.1 FCS Computation Method ............................   35
   B.2 Fast FCS table generator ..........................   36



Perkins                                                         [Page 1]

RFC 1134                          PPP                      November 1989


   REFERENCES ............................................   37
   AUTHOR'S ADDRESS ......................................   38

Status of this Memo

   This memo defines a proposed protocol for the Internet community.

   This proposal is the product of the Point-to-Point Protocol Working
   Group of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF).  Comments on this
   memo should be submitted to the IETF Point-to-Point Protocol Working
   Group chair by January 15, 1990.  Comments will be reviewed at the
   February 1990 IETF meeting, with the goal of advancing PPP to draft
   standard status.  Distribution of this memo is unlimited.

Abstract

   The Point-to-Point Protocol (PPP) provides a method for transmitting
   datagrams over serial point-to-point links.  PPP is composed of three
   parts:

      1. A method for encapsulating datagrams over serial links.

      2. An extensible Link Control Protocol (LCP).

      3. A family of Network Control Protocols (NCP) for establishing
         and configuring different network-layer protocols.

   This document defines the encapsulation scheme, the basic LCP, and an
   NCP for establishing and configuring the Internet Protocol (IP)
   (called the IP Control Protocol, IPCP).

   The options and facilities used by the LCP and the IPCP are defined
   in separate documents.  Control protocols for configuring and
   utilizing other network-layer protocols besides IP (e.g., DECNET,
   OSI) are expected to be developed as needed.

1.  Introduction

1.1.  Motivation

   In the last few years, the Internet has seen explosive growth in the
   number of hosts supporting TCP/IP.  The vast majority of these hosts
   are connected to Local Area Networks (LANs) of various types,
   Ethernet being the most common.  Most of the other hosts are
   connected through Wide Area Networks (WANs) such as X.25 style Public
   Data Networks (PDNs).  Relatively few of these hosts are connected
   with simple point-to-point (i.e., serial) links.  Yet, point-to-point
   links are among the oldest methods of data communications and almost



Perkins                                                         [Page 2]

RFC 1134                          PPP                      November 1989


   every host supports point-to-point connections.  For example,
   asynchronous RS-232-C [1] interfaces are essentially ubiquitous.

   One reason for the small number of point-to-point IP links is the
   lack of a standard encapsulation protocol.  There are plenty of non-
   standard (and at least one defacto standard) encapsulation protocols
   available, but there is not one which has been agreed upon as an
   Internet Standard.  By contrast, standard encapsulation schemes do
   exist for the transmission of datagrams over most popular LANs.

   One purpose of this memo is to remedy this problem.  But even more
   importantly, the Point-to-Point Protocol proposes more than just an
   encapsulation scheme.  Point-to-Point links tend to exacerbate many
   problems with the current family of network protocols.  For instance,
   assignment and management of IP addresses, which is a problem even in
   LAN environments, is especially difficult over switched point-to-
   point circuits (e.g., dialups).

   Some additional issues addressed by PPP include asynchronous
   (start/stop) and bit-oriented synchronous encapsulation, network
   protocol multiplexing, link configuration, link quality testing,
   error detection, and option negotiation for such capabilities as
   network-layer address negotiation and data compression negotiation.

   PPP addresses these issues by providing an extensible Link Control
   Protocol (LCP) and a family of Network Control Protocols (NCP) to
   negotiate optional configuration parameters and facilities.

1.2.  Overview of PPP

   PPP has three main components:

      1. A method for encapsulating datagrams over serial links.  PPP
         uses HDLC as a basis for encapsulating datagrams over point-
         to-point links.

      2. An extensible Link Control Protocol (LCP) to establish,
         configure, and test the data-link connection.

      3. A family of Network Control Protocols (NCP) for establishing
         and configuring different network-layer protocols.  PPP is
         designed to allow the simultaneous use of multiple network-
         layer protocols.

   In order to establish communications over a point-to-point link, the
   originating PPP would first send LCP packets to configure and test
   the data link.  After the link has been establish and optional
   facilities have been negotiated as needed by the LCP, the originating



Perkins                                                         [Page 3]

RFC 1134                          PPP                      November 1989


   PPP would send NCP packets to choose and configure one or more
   network-layer protocols.  Once each of the chosen network-layer
   protocols has been configured, datagrams from each network-layer
   protocol can be sent over the link.

   The link will remain configured for communications until explicit LCP
   or NCP packets close the link down, or until some external event
   occurs (e.g., inactivity timer expires or user intervention).

1.3.  Organization of the document

   This memo is divided into several sections.  Section 2 discusses the
   physical-layer requirements of PPP.  Section 3 describes the Data
   Link Layer including the PPP frame format and data link encapsulation
   scheme.  Section 4 specifies the LCP including the connection
   establishment and option negotiation procedures.  Section 5 specifies
   the IP Control Protocol (IPCP), which is the NCP for the Internet
   Protocol, and describes the encapsulation of IP datagrams within PPP
   packets.  Appendix A summarizes important features of asynchronous
   HDLC, and Appendix B describes an efficient table-lookup algorithm
   for fast Frame Check Sequence (FCS) computation.

2.  Physical Layer Requirements

   The Point-to-Point Protocol is capable of operating across any
   DTE/DCE interface (e.g., EIA RS-232-C, EIA RS-422, EIA RS-423 and
   CCITT V.35).  The only absolute requirement imposed by PPP is the
   provision of a duplex circuit, either dedicated or switched, which
   can operate in either an asynchronous (start/stop) or synchronous
   bit-serial mode, transparent to PPP Data Link Layer frames.  PPP does
   not impose any restrictions regarding transmission rate, other than
   those imposed by the particular DTE/DCE interface in use.

   PPP does not require the use of modem control signals, such as
   Request To Send (RTS), Clear To Send (CTS), Data Carrier Detect
   (DCD), and Data Terminal Ready (DTR).  However, using such signals
   when available can allow greater functionality and performance.

3.  The Data Link Layer

   The Point-to-Point Protocol uses the principles, terminology, and
   frame structure of the International Organization For
   Standardization's (ISO) High-level Data Link Control (HDLC)
   procedures (ISO 3309-1979 [2]), as modified by ISO 3309:1984/PDAD1
   "Addendum 1: Start/stop transmission" [5].  ISO 3309-1979 specifies
   the HDLC frame structure for use in synchronous environments.  ISO
   3309:1984/PDAD1 specifies proposed modifications to ISO 3309-1979 to
   allow its use in asynchronous environments.



Perkins                                                         [Page 4]

RFC 1134                          PPP                      November 1989


   The PPP control procedures use the definitions and Control field
   encodings standardized in ISO 4335-1979 [3] and ISO 4335-
   1979/Addendum 1-1979 [4].  The PPP frame structure is also consistent
   with CCITT Recommendation X.25 LAPB [6], since that too is based on
   HDLC.

      Note: ISO 3309:1984/PDAD1 is a Proposed Draft standard.  At
      present, it seems that ISO 3309:1984/PDAD1 is stable and likely to
      become an International Standard.  Therefore, we feel comfortable
      about using it before it becomes an International Standard.  The
      progress of this proposal should be tracked and encouraged by the
      Internet community.

   The purpose of this memo is not to document what is already
   standardized in ISO 3309.  We assume that the reader is already
   familiar with HDLC, or has access to a copy of [2] or [6].  Instead,
   this paper attempts to give a concise summary and point out specific
   options and features used by PPP.  Since "Addendum 1: Start/stop
   transmission", is not yet standardized and widely available, it is
   summarized in Appendix A.

3.1.  Frame Format

   A summary of the standard PPP frame structure is shown below.  The
   fields are transmitted from left to right.

      +----------+---------+---------+----------+------------
      |   Flag   | Address | Control | Protocol | Information
      | 01111110 | 1111111 | 0000011 | 16 bits  |      *
      +----------+---------+---------+----------+------------
              ---+---------+----------+
                 |   FCS   |   Flag   |
                 | 16 bits | 01111110 |
              ---+---------+----------+

   This figure does not include start/stop bits (for asynchronous links)
   or any bits or octets inserted for transparency.  When asynchronous
   links are used, all octets are transmitted with one start bit, eight
   bits of data, and one stop bit.  There is no provision in either PPP
   or ISO 3309:1984/PDAD1 for seven bit asynchronous links.

   To remain consistent with standard Internet practice, and avoid
   confusion for people used to reading RFCs, all binary numbers in the
   following descriptions are in Most Significant Bit to Least
   Significant Bit order, reading from left to right, unless otherwise
   indicated.  Note that this is contrary to standard ISO and CCITT
   practice which orders bits as transmitted (i.e., network bit order).
   Keep this in mind when comparing this document with the international



Perkins                                                         [Page 5]

RFC 1134                          PPP                      November 1989


   standards documents.

   Flag Sequence

      The Flag Sequence is a single octet and indicates the beginning or
      end of a frame.  The Flag Sequence consists of the binary sequence
      01111110 (hexadecimal 0x7e).

   Address Field

      The Address field is a single octet and contains the binary
      sequence 11111111 (hexadecimal 0xff), the All-Stations address.
      PPP does not assign individual station addresses.  The All-
      Stations address should always be recognized and received.  Frames
      with other Addresses should be silently discarded.

   Control Field

      The Control field is a single octet and contains the binary
      sequence 00000011 (hexadecimal 0x03), the Unnumbered Information
      (UI) command with the P/F bit is set to zero.  Frames with other
      Control field values should be silently discarded.

   Protocol Field

      The Protocol field is two octets and its value identifies the
      protocol encapsulated in the Information field of the frame.  The
      most up-to-date values of the Protocol field are specified in the
      most recent "Assigned Numbers" RFC [11].  Initial values are also
      listed below.

      Protocol field values in the "cxxx" range identify datagrams as
      belonging to the Link Control Protocol (LCP) or associated
      protocols.  Values in the "8xxx" range identify datagrams belonging
      to the family of Network Control Protocols (NCP).  Values in the
      "0xxx" range identify the network protocol of specific datagrams.

      This Protocol field is defined by PPP and is not a field defined
      by HDLC.  However, the Protocol field is consistent with the ISO
      3309 extension mechanism for Address fields.  All Protocols MUST be
      odd; the least significant bit of the least significant octet MUST
      equal "1".  Also, all Protocols MUST be assigned such that the
      least significant bit of the most significant octet equals "0".
      Frames received which don't comply with these rules should be
      considered as having an unrecognized Protocol, and should be
      handled as specified by the LCP.  The Protocol field is
      transmitted and received most significant octet first.




Perkins                                                         [Page 6]

RFC 1134                          PPP                      November 1989


      The Protocol field is initially assigned as follows:

         Value (in hex)          Protocol

         0001 to 001f            reserved (transparency inefficient)
         0021                    Internet Protocol
         0023                  * ISO CLNP
         0025                  * Xerox NS IDP
         0027                  * DECnet Phase IV
         0029                  * Appletalk
         002b                  * Novell IPX
         002d                  * Van Jacobson Compressed TCP/IP 1
         002f                  * Van Jacobson Compressed TCP/IP 2

         8021                    Internet Protocol Control Protocol
         8023                  * ISO CLNP Control Protocol
         8025                  * Xerox NS IDP Control Protocol
         8027                  * DECnet Phase IV Control Protocol
         8029                  * Appletalk Control Protocol
         802b                  * Novell IPX Control Protocol
         802d                  * Reserved
         802f                  * Reserved

         c021                    Link Control Protocol
         c023                  * User/Password Authentication Protocol

            * Reserved for future use; not described in this document.

   Information Field

      The Information field is zero or more octets.  The Information
      field contains the datagram for the protocol specified in the
      Protocol field.  The end of the Information field is found by
      locating the closing Flag Sequence and allowing two octets for the
      Frame Check Sequence field.  The default maximum length of the
      Information field is 1500 octets.  By prior agreement, consenting
      PPP implementations may use other values for the maximum
      Information field length.

      On transmission, the Information field may be padded with an
      arbitrary number of octets up to the maximum length.  It is the
      responsibility of each protocol to disambiguate padding characters
      from real information.

   Frame Check Sequence (FCS) Field

      The Frame Check Sequence field is normally 16 bits (two octets).
      By prior agreement, consenting PPP implementations may use a 32-



Perkins                                                         [Page 7]

RFC 1134                          PPP                      November 1989


      bit (four-octet) FCS for improved error detection.

      The FCS field is calculated over all bits of the Address, Control,
      Protocol and Information fields not including any start and stop
      bits (asynchronous) and any bits (synchronous) or octets
      (asynchronous) inserted for transparency.  This does not include
      the Flag Sequences or FCS field.  The FCS is transmitted with the
      coefficient of the highest term first.

      For more information on the specification of the FCS, see ISO 3309
      or CCITT X.25.

         Note: A fast, table-driven implementation of the 16-bit FCS
         algorithm is shown in Appendix B.  This implementation is based
         on [7] and [8].

   Modifications to the Basic Frame Format

      The Link Control Protocol can negotiate modifications to the
      standard PPP frame structure.  However, modified frames will
      always be clearly distinguishable from standard frames.

4.  The PPP Link Control Protocol (LCP)

   The Link Control Protocol (LCP) provides a method of establishing,
   configuring, maintaining and terminating the point-to-point
   connection.  LCP goes through four distinct phases:

   Phase 1: Link Establishment and Configuration Negotiation

      Before any network-layer datagrams (e.g., IP) may be exchanged,
      LCP must first open the connection through an exchange of
      Configure packets.  This exchange is complete, and the Open state
      entered, once a Configure-Ack packet (described below) has been
      both sent and received.  Any non-LCP packets received before this
      exchange is complete are silently discarded.

      It is important to note that LCP handles configuration only of the
      link; LCP does not handle configuration of individual network-
      layer protocols.  In particular, all Configuration Parameters
      which are independent of particular network-layer protocols are
      configured by LCP.  All Configuration Options are assumed to be at
      default values unless altered by the configuration exchange.

   Phase 2: Link Quality Determination

      LCP allows an optional Link Quality Determination phase following
      transition to the LCP Open state.  In this phase, the link is



Perkins                                                         [Page 8]

RFC 1134                          PPP                      November 1989


      tested to determine if the link quality is sufficient to bring up
      network-layer protocols.  This phase is completely optional.  LCP
      may delay transmission of network-layer protocol information until
      this phase is completed.

      The procedure for Link Quality Determination is unspecified and
      may vary from implementation to implementation, or because of
      user-configured parameters, but only so long as the procedure
      doesn't violate other aspects of LCP.  One suggested method is to
      use LCP Echo-Request and Echo-Reply packets.

      What is important is that this phase may persist for any length of
      time.  Therefore, implementations should avoid fixed timeouts when
      waiting for their peers to advance to phase 3.

   Phase 3: Network-Layer Protocol Configuration Negotiation

      Once LCP has finished the Link Quality Determination phase,
      network-layer protocols may be separately configured by the
      appropriate Network Control Protocols (NCP), and may be brought up
      and taken down at any time.  If LCP closes the link, it informs
      the network-layer protocols so that they may take appropriate
      action.

   Phase 4: Link Termination

      LCP may terminate the link at any time.  This will usually be done
      at the request of a human user, but may happen because of a
      physical event such as the loss of carrier, or the expiration of
      an idle-period timer.

4.1.  The LCP Automation

4.1.1.  Overview

   LCP is specified by a number of packet formats and a finite-state
   automation.  This section presents an overview of the LCP automation,
   followed by a representation of it as both a state diagram and a
   state transition table.

   There are three classes of LCP packets:

      1. Link Establishment packets used to establish and configure a
         link, (e.g., Configure-Request, Configure-Ack, Configure-Nak
         and Configure-Reject)

      2. Link Termination packets used to terminate a link, (e.g.,
         Terminate-Request and Terminate-Ack)



Perkins                                                         [Page 9]

RFC 1134                          PPP                      November 1989


      3. Link Maintenance packets used to manage and debug a link,
         (e.g., Code-Reject, Protocol-Reject, Echo-Request, Echo-Reply
         and Discard-Request)

   The finite-state automation is defined by events, state transitions
   and actions.  Events include receipt of external commands such as
   Open and Close, expiration of the Restart timer, and receipt of
   packets from a LCP peer.  Actions include the starting of the Restart
   timer and transmission of packets.

4.1.2.  State Diagram

   The state diagram which follows describes the sequence of events for
   reaching agreement on Configuration Options (opening the PPP
   connection) and for later closing of the connection.  The state
   machine is initially in the Closed state (1).  Once the Open state
   (6) has been reached, both ends of the link have met the requirement
   of having both sent and received a Configure-Ack packet.

   In the state diagram, events are shown above horizontal lines.
   Actions are shown below horizontal lines.  Two types of LCP packets -
   Configure-Naks and Configure-Rejects - are not differentiated in the
   state diagram.  As will be described later, these packets do indeed
   serve different, though similar, functions.  However, at the level of
   detail of this state diagram, they always cause the same transition.

   Since a more detailed specification of the LCP automation is given in
   a state transition table in the following section, implementation
   should be done by consulting it rather than this state diagram.






















Perkins                                                        [Page 10]

RFC 1134                          PPP                      November 1989


                                    +------------------------------+
                                    |                              |
                                    V                              |
        +---2---+           PO +---1---+        RTA +---7---+      |
        |       |<-------------|       |<-----------|       |      |
        |Listen |              |Closed |            |Closing|      |
    RCR |       | C            |       | PLD        |       |      |
   +----|       |----->+------>|       |<---Any     |       |<--+  |
   |scr +-------+      ^       +-------+    State   +-------+   |  |
   |                   |     AO  |                    ^   | TO  |  |
   |       +-----------+     --- |                    |   +---->+  |
   |       |                 SCR |     C              |     str ^  |
   |    C  |   RCN/TO            |   +----------------+         |  |
   |    -- | +-------->+<--------+   | str                      |  |
   |       | | scr     |             |                          |  |
   |    +---3---+      V   TO  +---4---+            +-------+   |  |
   |    |       |<-----+<------|       |<-----------|       |   |  |
   |    | Req-  |          scr | Ack-  |        scn | Good  |   |  |
   |    | Sent  | RCA          | Rcvd  | RCR        | Req?  |   |  |
   |    |       |------------->|       |----------->|       |   |  |
   |    +-------+              +-------+            +-------+   |  |
   |       | ^                                         |        |  |
   |   RCR | +<--------+                               |        |  |
   |   --- | |         |     TO        RCN         --- |        |  |
   |       | | ---     +---------+   +-----+       sca |        |  |
   |       V | scn           scr |   | scr |           V        |  |
   |    +-------+              +---5---+   |        +---6---+ C |  |
   +--->|       |------------->|       |<--+        |       |---+  |
        | Good  | sca          | Ack-  |            | Open  | str  |
        | Req?  |          RCR | Sent  | RCA        |       |      |
        |       |<-------------|       |----------->|       |      |
        +-------+              +-------+            +-------+      |
              ^                                       |   |        |
              |                                   RCR |   | RTR    |
              +---------------------------------------+   +--------+
                                                  scr       sta

   Events                                  Actions
   RCR - Receive-Configure-Request         scr - Send Configure-Request
   RCA - Receive-Configure-Ack             sca - Send Configure-Ack
   RCN - Receive-Configure-Nak or Reject   scn - Send Configure-Nak or
   RTR - Receive-Terminate-Req                   Reject
   RTA - Receive-Terminate-Ack             str - Send Terminate-Req
   AO  - Active-Open                       sta - Sent Terminate-Ack
   PO  - Passive-Open
   C   - Close
   TO  - Timeout
   PLD - Physical-Layer-Down



Perkins                                                        [Page 11]

RFC 1134                          PPP                      November 1989


4.1.3.  State Transition Table

   The complete state transition table follows.  States are indicated
   horizontally, and events are read vertically.  State transitions and
   actions are represented in the form action/new-state.  Two actions
   caused by the same event are represented as action1&action2.

         | State
         |   1       2        3        4        5        6        7
   Events| Closed  Listen  Req-Sent Ack-Rcvd Ack-Sent  Open    Closing
   ------+-------------------------------------------------------------
     AO  | scr/3   scr/3      3        4        5        6      scr/3
     PO  |   2       2        2*       4        5        6      sta/3*
     C   |   1       1        1*       1      str/7    str/7      7
     TO  |   1       2      scr/3    scr/3    scr/3      6      str/7*
    PLD  |   1       1        1        1        1        1        1
    RCR+ | sta/1 scr&sca/5  sca/5    sca/6    sca/5  scr&sca/5    7
    RCR- | sta/1 scr&scn/3  scn/3    scn/4    scn/3  scr&scn/3    7
    RCA  | sta/1   sta/2      4      scr/3      6      scr/3      7
    RCN  | sta/1   sta/2    scr/3    scr/3    scr/5    scr/3      7
    RTR  | sta/1   sta/2    sta/3    sta/3    sta/3    sta/1    sta/7
    RTA  |   1       2        3        3        3        1        1
    RCJ  |   1       2        1        1        1        1        1
    RUC  | scj/1   scj/1    scj/1    scj/1    scj/1    scj/1  1 scj/1
    RER  | sta/1   sta/2      3        4        5      ser/1      7

   Notes:
       RCR+ - Receive-Configure-Request (Good)
       RCR- - Receive-Configure-Request (Bad)
       RCJ  - Receive-Code-Reject
       RUC  - Receive-Unknown-Code
       RER  - Receive-Echo-Request
       scj  - Send-Code-Reject
       ser  - Send-Echo-Reply
        *   - Special attention necessary, see detailed text

4.1.4.  Events

   Transitions and actions in the LCP state machine are caused by
   events.  Some events are caused by commands executed at the local end
   (e.g., Active-Open, Passive-Open, and Close), others are caused by
   the receipt of packets from the remote end (e.g., Receive- Configure-
   Request, Receive-Configure-Ack, Receive-Configure-Nak, Receive-
   Terminate-Request and Receive-Terminate-Ack), and still others are
   caused by the expiration of the Restart timer started as the result
   of other events (e.g., Timeout).

   Following is a list of LCP events.



Perkins                                                        [Page 12]

RFC 1134                          PPP                      November 1989


   Active-Open (AO)

      The Active-Open event indicates the local execution of an Active-
      Open command by the network administrator (human or program).
      When this event occurs, LCP should immediately attempt to open the
      connection by exchanging configuration packets with the LCP peer.

   Passive-Open (PO)

      The Passive-Open event is similar to the Active-Open event.
      However, instead of immediately exchanging configuration packets,
      LCP should wait for the peer to send the first packet.  This will
      only happen after an Active-Open event in the LCP peer.

   Close (C)

      The Close event indicates the local execution of a Close command.
      When this event occurs, LCP should immediately attempt to close
      the connection.

   Timeout (TO)

      The Timeout event indicates the expiration of the LCP Restart
      timer.  The LCP Restart timer is started as the result of other
      LCP events.

      The Restart timer is used to time out transmissions of Configure-
      Request and Terminate-Request packets.  Expiration of the Restart
      timer causes a Timeout event, which triggers the corresponding
      Configure-Request or Terminate-Request packet to be retransmitted.
      The Restart timer MUST be configurable, but should default to
      three (3) seconds.

   Receive-Configure-Request (RCR)

      The Receive-Configure-Request event occurs when a Configure-
      Request packet is received from the LCP peer.  The Configure-
      Request packet indicates the desire to open a LCP connection and
      may specify Configuration Options.  The Configure-Request packet
      is more fully described in a later section.

   Receive-Configure-Ack (RCA)

      The Receive-Configure-Ack event occurs when a valid Configure-Ack
      packet is received from the LCP peer.  The Configure-Ack packet is
      a positive response to a Configure-Request packet.





Perkins                                                        [Page 13]

RFC 1134                          PPP                      November 1989


   Receive-Configure-Nak (RCN)

      The Receive-Configure-Nak event occurs when a valid Configure-Nak
      or Configure-Reject packet is received from the LCP peer.  The
      Configure-Nak and Configure-Reject packets are negative responses
      to a Configure-Request packet.

   Receive-Terminate-Request (RTR)

      The Receive-Terminate-Request event occurs when a Terminate-
      Request packet is received from the LCP peer.  The Terminate-
      Request packet indicates the desire to close the LCP connection.

   Receive-Terminate-Ack (RTA)

      The Receive-Terminate-Ack event occurs when a Terminate-Ack packet
      is received from the LCP peer.  The Terminate-Ack packet is a
      response to a Terminate-Request packet.

   Receive-Code-Reject (RCJ)

      The Receive-Code-Reject event occurs when a Code-Reject packet is
      received from the LCP peer.  The Code-Reject packet communicates
      an error that immediately closes the connection.

   Receive-Unknown-Code (RUC)

      The Receive-Unknown-Code event occurs when an un-interpretable
      packet is received from the LCP peer.  The Code-Reject packet is a
      response to an unknown packet.

   Receive-Echo-Request (RER)

      The Receive-Echo-Request event occurs when a Echo-Request, Echo-
      Reply, or Discard-Request packet is received from the LCP peer.
      The Echo-Reply packet is a response to a Echo-Request packet.
      There is no reply to a Discard-Request.

   Physical-Layer-Down (PLD)

      The Physical-Layer-Down event occurs when the Physical Layer
      indicates that it is down.

4.1.5.  Actions

   Actions in the LCP state machine are caused by events and typically
   indicate the transmission of packets and/or the starting or stopping
   of the Restart timer.  Following is a list of LCP actions.



Perkins                                                        [Page 14]

RFC 1134                          PPP                      November 1989


   Send-Configure-Request (scr)

      The Send-Configure-Request action transmits a Configure-Request
      packet.  This indicates the desire to open a LCP connection with a
      specified set of Configuration Options.  The Restart timer is
      started after the Configure-Request packet is transmitted, to
      guard against packet loss.

   Send-Configure-Ack (sca)

      The Send-Configure-Ack action transmits a Configure-Ack packet.
      This acknowledges the receipt of a Configure-Request packet with
      an acceptable set of Configuration Options.

   Send-Configure-Nak (scn)

      The Send-Configure-Nak action transmits a Configure-Nak or
      Configure-Reject packet, as appropriate.  This negative response
      reports the receipt of a Configure-Request packet with an
      unacceptable set of Configuration Options.  Configure-Nak packets
      are used to refuse a Configuration Option value, and to suggest a
      new, acceptable value.  Configure-Reject packets are used to
      refuse all negotiation about a Configuration Option, typically
      because it is not recognized or implemented.  The use of
      Configure-Nak vs. Configure-Reject is more fully described in the
      section on LCP Packet Formats.

   Send-Terminate-Req (str)

      The Send-Terminate-Request action transmits a Terminate-Request
      packet.  This indicates the desire to close a LCP connection.  The
      Restart timer is started after the Terminate-Request packet is
      transmitted, to guard against packet loss.

   Send-Terminate-Ack (sta)

      The Send-Terminate-Request action transmits a Terminate-Ack
      packet.  This acknowledges the receipt of a Terminate-Request
      packet or otherwise confirms the belief that a LCP connection is
      Closed.

   Send-Code-Reject (scj)

      The Send-Code-Reject action transmits a Code-Reject packet.  This
      indicates the receipt of an unknown type of packet.  This is an
      unrecoverable error which causes immediate transitions to the
      Closed state on both ends of the link.




Perkins                                                        [Page 15]

RFC 1134                          PPP                      November 1989


   Send-Echo-Reply (ser)

      The Send-Echo-Reply action transmits an Echo-Reply packet.  This
      acknowledges the receipt of an Echo-Request packet.

4.1.6.  States

   Following is a more detailed description of each LCP state.

   Closed (1)

      The initial and final state is the Closed state.  In the Closed
      state the connection is down and there is no attempt to open it;
      all connection requests from peers are rejected.  Physical-Layer-
      Down events always cause an immediate transition to the Closed
      state.

      There are two events which cause a transition out of the Closed
      state, Active-Open and Passive-Open.  Upon an Active-Open event, a
      Configure-Request is transmitted, the Restart timer is started,
      and the Request-Sent state is entered.  Upon a Passive-Open event,
      the Listen state is entered immediately.  Upon receipt of any
      packet, with the exception of a Terminate-Ack, a Terminate-Ack is
      sent.  Terminate-Acks are silently discarded to avoid creating a
      loop.

      The Restart timer is not running in the Closed state.

      The Physical Layer connection may be disconnected at any time when
      in the LCP Closed state.

   Listen (2)

      The Listen state is similar to the Closed state in that the
      connection is down and there is no attempt to open it.  However,
      peer connection requests are no longer rejected.

      Upon receipt of a Configure-Request, a Configure-Request is
      immediately transmitted and the Restart timer is started.  The
      received Configuration Options are examined and the proper
      response is sent.  If a Configure-Ack is sent, the Ack-Sent state
      is entered.  Otherwise, if a Configure-Nak or Configure-Reject is
      sent, the Request-Sent state is entered.  In either case, LCP
      exits its passive state, and begins to actively open the
      connection.  Terminate-Ack packets are sent in response to either
      Configure-Ack or Configure-Nak packets,

      The Restart timer is not running in the Listen state.



Perkins                                                        [Page 16]

RFC 1134                          PPP                      November 1989


   Request-Sent (3)

      In the Request-Sent state an active attempt is made to open the
      connection.  A Configure-Request has been sent and the Restart
      timer is running, but a Configure-Ack has not yet been received
      nor has one been sent.

      Upon receipt of a Configure-Ack, the Ack-Received state is
      immediately entered.  Upon receipt of a Configure-Nak or
      Configure-Reject, the Configure-Request Configuration Options are
      adjusted appropriately, a new Configure-Request is transmitted,
      and the Restart timer is restarted.  Similarly, upon the
      expiration of the Restart timer, a new Configure-Request is
      transmitted and the Restart timer is restarted.  Upon receipt of a
      Configure-Request, the Configuration Options are examined and if
      acceptable, a Configure-Ack is sent and the Ack-Sent state is
      entered.  If the Configuration Options are unacceptable, a
      Configure-Nak or Configure-Reject is sent as appropriate.

      Since there is an outstanding Configure-Request in the Request-
      Sent state, special care must be taken to implement the Passive-
      Open and Close events; otherwise, it is possible for the LCP peer
      to think the connection is open.  Processing of either event
      should be postponed until there is reasonable assurance that the
      peer is not open.  In particular, the Restart timer should be
      allowed to expire.

   Ack-Received (4)

      In the Ack-Received state, a Configure-Request has been sent and a
      Configure-Ack has been received.  The Restart timer is still
      running since a Configure-Ack has not yet been transmitted.

      Upon receipt of a Configure-Request with acceptable Configuration
      Options, a Configure-Ack is transmitted, the Restart timer is
      stopped and the Open state is entered.  If the Configuration
      Options are unacceptable, a Configure-Nak or Configure-Reject is
      sent as appropriate.  Upon the expiration of the Restart timer, a
      new Configure-Request is transmitted, the Restart timer is
      restarted, and the state machine returns to the Request-Sent
      state.

   Ack-Sent (5)

      In the Ack-Sent state, a Configure-Ack and a Configure-Request
      have been sent but a Configure-Ack has not yet been received.  The
      Restart timer is always running in the Ack-Sent state.




Perkins                                                        [Page 17]

RFC 1134                          PPP                      November 1989


      Upon receipt of a Configure-Ack, the Restart timer is stopped and
      the Open state is entered.  Upon receipt of a Configure-Nak or
      Configure-Reject, the Configure-Request Configuration Options are
      adjusted appropriately, a new Configure-Request is transmitted,
      and the Restart timer is restarted.  Upon the expiration of the
      Restart timer, a new Configure-Request is transmitted, the Restart
      timer is restarted, and the state machine returns to the Request-
      Sent state.

   Open (6)

      In the Open state, a connection exists and data may be
      communicated over the link.  The Restart timer is not running in
      the Open state.

      In normal operation, only two events cause transitions out of the
      Open state.  Upon receipt of a Close command, a Terminate-Request
      is transmitted, the Restart timer is started, and the Closing
      state is entered.  Upon receipt of a Terminate-Request, a
      Terminate-Ack is transmitted and the Closed state is entered.
      Upon receipt of an Echo-Request, an Echo-Reply is transmitted.
      Similarly, Echo-Reply and Discard-Request packets are silently
      discarded or processed as expected.  All other events cause
      immediate transitions out of the Open state and should be handled
      as if the state machine were in the Listen state.

   Closing (7)

      In the Closing state, an active attempt is made to close the
      connection.  A Terminate-Request has been sent and the Restart
      timer is running, but a Terminate-Ack has not yet been received.

      Upon receipt of a Terminate-Ack, the Closed state is immediately
      entered.  Upon the expiration of the Restart timer, a new
      Terminate-Request is transmitted and the Restart timer is
      restarted.  After the Restart timer has expired Max-Restart times,
      this action may be skipped, and the Closed state may be entered.
      Max-Restart MUST be a configurable parameter.

      Since there is an outstanding Terminate-Request in the Closing
      state, special care must be taken to implement the Passive-Open
      event; otherwise, it is possible for the LCP peer to think the
      connection is open.  Processing of the Passive-Open event should
      be postponed until there is reasonable assurance that the peer is
      not open.  In particular, the implementation should wait until the
      state machine would normally transition to the Closed state
      because of a Receive-Terminate-Ack event or Max-Restart Timeout
      events.



Perkins                                                        [Page 18]

RFC 1134                          PPP                      November 1989


4.2.  Loop Avoidance

   Note that the protocol makes a reasonable attempt at avoiding
   Configuration Option negotiation loops.  However, the protocol does
   NOT guarantee that loops will not happen.  As with any negotiation,
   it is possible to configure two PPP implementations with conflicting
   policies that will never converge.  It is also possible to configure
   policies which do converge, but which take significant time to do so.
   Implementors should keep this in mind and should implement loop
   detection mechanisms or higher level timeouts.  If a timeout is
   implemented, it MUST be configurable.

   For example, implementations could take care to avoid Configure-
   Request or Terminate-Request livelocks by using a Max-Retries
   counter.  A Configure-Request livelock could occur when an
   originating PPP sends and re-sends a C-R without receiving a reply
   (e.g., the receiving PPP entity may have died).  A Terminate-Request
   livelock could occur when the originating PPP sends and re-sends a
   T-R without receiving a Terminate-Ack (e.g., the T-A may have been
   lost, but the remote PPP may have already terminated).  Max-Retries
   indicates the number of packet retransmissions that are allowed
   before there is reasonable assurance that a livelock situation
   exists.  Max-Retries MUST also be configurable, but should default to
   ten (10) retransmissions.

4.3  Packet Format

   Exactly one Link Control Protocol packet is encapsulated in the
   Information field of PPP Data Link Layer frames where the Protocol
   field indicates type hex c021 (Link Control Protocol).

   A summary of the Link Control Protocol packet format is shown below.
   The fields are transmitted from left to right.

       0                   1                   2                   3
       0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
      |     Code      |  Identifier   |            Length             |
      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
      |    Data ...
      +-+-+-+-+

   Code

      The Code field is one octet and identifies the kind of LCP packet.
      LCP Codes are assigned as follows:





Perkins                                                        [Page 19]

RFC 1134                          PPP                      November 1989


         1       Configure-Request
         2       Configure-Ack
         3       Configure-Nak
         4       Configure-Reject
         5       Terminate-Request
         6       Terminate-Ack
         7       Code-Reject
         8       Protocol-Reject
         9       Echo-Request
         10      Echo-Reply
         11      Discard-Request

   Identifier

      The Identifier field is one octet and aids in matching requests
      and replies.

   Length

      The Length field is two octets and indicates the length of the LCP
      packet including the Code, Identifier, Length and Data fields.
      Octets outside the range of the Length field should be treated as
      Data Link Layer padding and should be ignored on reception.

   Data

      The Data field is zero or more octets as indicated by the Length
      field.  The format of the Data field is determined by the Code
      field.

   Regardless of which Configuration Options are enabled, all LCP
   packets are always sent in the full, standard form, as if no
   Configuration Options were enabled.  This ensures that LCP
   Configure-Request packets are always recognizable even when one end
   of the link mistakenly believes the link to be Open.

   This document describes Version 1 of the Link Control Protocol.  In
   the interest of simplicity, there is no version field in the LCP
   packet.  If a new version of LCP is necessary in the future, the
   intention is that a new Data Link Layer Protocol field value should
   be used to differentiate Version 1 LCP from all other versions.  A
   correctly functioning Version 1 LCP implementation will always
   respond to unknown Protocols (including other versions) with an
   easily recognizable Version 1 packet, thus providing a deterministic
   fallback mechanism for implementations of other versions.






Perkins                                                        [Page 20]

RFC 1134                          PPP                      November 1989


4.3.1.  Configure-Request

   Description

      A LCP implementation wishing to open a connection MUST transmit a
      LCP packet with the Code field set to 1 (Configure-Request) and
      the Options field filled with any desired changes to the default
      link Configuration Options.

      Upon reception of a Configure-Request, an appropriate reply MUST
      be transmitted.

   A summary of the Configure-Request packet format is shown below.  The
   fields are transmitted from left to right.

    0                   1                   2                   3
    0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
   |     Code      |  Identifier   |            Length             |
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
   | Options ...
   +-+-+-+-+

   Code

      1 for Configure-Request.

   Identifier

      The Identifier field should be changed on each transmission.  On
      reception, the Identifier field should be copied into the
      Identifier field of the appropriate reply packet.

   Options

      The options field is variable in length and contains the list of
      zero or more Configuration Options that the sender desires to
      negotiate.  All Configuration Options are always negotiated
      simultaneously.  The format of Configuration Options is further
      described in a later section.

4.3.2.  Configure-Ack

   Description

      If every Configuration Option received in a Configure-Request is
      both recognizable and acceptable, then a LCP implementation should
      transmit a LCP packet with the Code field set to 2 (Configure-



Perkins                                                        [Page 21]

RFC 1134                          PPP                      November 1989


      Ack), the Identifier field copied from the received Configure-
      Request, and the Options field copied from the received
      Configure-Request.  The acknowledged Configuration Options MUST
      NOT be reordered or modified in any way.

      On reception of a Configure-Ack, the Identifier field must match
      that of the last transmitted Configure-Request, or the packet is
      invalid.  Additionally, the Configuration Options in a Configure-
      Ack must match those of the last transmitted Configure-Request, or
      the packet is invalid.  Invalid packets should be silently
      discarded.

      Reception of a valid Configure-Ack indicates that all
      Configuration Options sent in the last Configure-Request are
      acceptable.

   A summary of the Configure-Ack packet format is shown below.  The
   fields are transmitted from left to right.

    0                   1                   2                   3
    0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
   |     Code      |  Identifier   |            Length             |
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
   | Options ...
   +-+-+-+-+

   Code

      2 for Configure-Ack.

   Identifier

      The Identifier field is a copy of the Identifier field of the
      Configure-Request which caused this Configure-Ack.

   Options

      The Options field is variable in length and contains the list of
      zero or more Configuration Options that the sender is
      acknowledging.  All Configuration Options are always acknowledged
      simultaneously.

4.3.3.  Configure-Nak

   Description

      If every element of the received Configuration Options is



Perkins                                                        [Page 22]

RFC 1134                          PPP                      November 1989


      recognizable but some are not acceptable, then a LCP
      implementation should transmit a LCP packet with the Code field
      set to 3 (Configure-Nak), the Identifier field copied from the
      received Configure-Request, and the Options field filled with only
      the unacceptable Configuration Options from the Configure-Request.
      All acceptable Configuration Options should be filtered out of the
      Configure-Nak, but otherwise the Configuration Options from the
      Configure-Request MUST NOT be reordered.  Each of the nak'd
      Configuration Options MUST be modified to a value acceptable to
      the Configure-Nak sender.  Finally, an implementation may be
      configured to require the negotiation of a specific option.  If
      that option is not listed, then that option may be appended to the
      list of nak'd Configuration Options in order to request the remote
      end to list that option in its next Configure-Request packet.  The
      appended option must include a value acceptable to the Configure-
      Nak sender.

      On reception of a Configure-Nak, the Identifier field must match
      that of the last transmitted Configure-Request, or the packet is
      invalid and should be silently discarded.

      Reception of a valid Configure-Nak indicates that a new
      Configure-Request should be sent with the Configuration Options
      modified as specified in the Configure-Nak.

   A summary of the Configure-Nak packet format is shown below.  The
   fields are transmitted from left to right.

    0                   1                   2                   3
    0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
   |     Code      |  Identifier   |            Length             |
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
   | Options ...
   +-+-+-+-+

   Code

      3 for Configure-Nak.

   Identifier

      The Identifier field is a copy of the Identifier field of the
      Configure-Request which caused this Configure-Nak.

   Options

      The Options field is variable in length and contains the list of



Perkins                                                        [Page 23]

RFC 1134                          PPP                      November 1989


      zero or more Configuration Options that the sender is nak'ing.
      All Configuration Options are always nak'd simultaneously.

4.3.4.  Configure-Reject

   Description

      If some Configuration Options received in a Configure-Request are
      not recognizable or are not acceptable for negotiation (as
      configured by a network manager), then a LCP implementation should
      transmit a LCP packet with the Code field set to 4 (Configure-
      Reject), the Identifier field copied from the received Configure-
      Request, and the Options field filled with only the unrecognized
      Configuration Options from the Configure-Request.  All
      recognizable and negotiable Configuration Options must be filtered
      out of the Configure-Reject, but otherwise the Configuration
      Options MUST not be reordered.

      On reception of a Configure-Reject, the Identifier field must
      match that of the last transmitted Configure-Request, or the
      packet is invalid.  Additionally, the Configuration Options in a
      Configure-Reject must be a proper subset of those in the last
      transmitted Configure-Request, or the packet is invalid.  Invalid
      packets should be silently discarded.

      Reception of a Configure-Reject indicates that a new Configure-
      Request should be sent which does not include any of the
      Configuration Options listed in the Configure-Reject.

   A summary of the Configure-Reject packet format is shown below.  The
   fields are transmitted from left to right.

    0                   1                   2                   3
    0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
   |     Code      |  Identifier   |            Length             |
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
   | Options ...
   +-+-+-+-+

   Code

      4 for Configure-Reject.

   Identifier

      The Identifier field is a copy of the Identifier field of the
      Configure-Request which caused this Configure-Reject.



Perkins                                                        [Page 24]

RFC 1134                          PPP                      November 1989


   Options

      The Options field is variable in length and contains the list of
      zero or more Configuration Options that the sender is rejecting.
      All Configuration Options are always rejected simultaneously.

4.3.5.  Terminate-Request and Terminate-Ack

   Description

      LCP includes Terminate-Request and Terminate-Ack Codes in order to
      provide a mechanism for closing a connection.

      A LCP implementation wishing to close a connection should transmit
      a LCP packet with the Code field set to 5 (Terminate-Request) and
      the Data field filled with any desired data.  Terminate-Request
      packets should continue to be sent until Terminate-Ack is
      received, the Physical Layer indicates that it has gone down, or a
      sufficiently large number have been transmitted such that the
      remote end is down with reasonable certainty.

      Upon reception of a Terminate-Request, a LCP packet MUST be
      transmitted with the Code field set to 6 (Terminate-Ack), the
      Identifier field copied from the Terminate-Request packet, and the
      Data field filled with any desired data.

      Reception of an unelicited Terminate-Ack indicates that the
      connection has been closed.

   A summary of the Terminate-Request and Terminate-Ack packet formats
   is shown below.  The fields are transmitted from left to right.

    0                   1                   2                   3
    0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
   |     Code      |  Identifier   |            Length             |
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
   |    Data ...
   +-+-+-+-+

   Code

      5 for Terminate-Request;

      6 for Terminate-Ack.






Perkins                                                        [Page 25]

RFC 1134                          PPP                      November 1989


   Identifier

      The Identifier field is one octet and aids in matching requests
      and replies.

   Data

      The Data field is zero or more octets and contains uninterpreted
      data for use by the sender.  The data may consist of any binary
      value and may be of any length from zero to the established value
      for the peer's MRU.

4.3.6.  Code-Reject

   Description

      Reception of a LCP packet with an unknown Code indicates that one
      of the communicating LCP implementations is faulty or incomplete.
      This error MUST be reported back to the sender of the unknown Code
      by transmitting a LCP packet with the Code field set to 7 (Code-
      Reject), and the inducing packet copied to the Rejected-Packet
      field.

      Upon reception of a Code-Reject, a LCP implementation should make
      an immediate transition to the Closed state, and should report the
      error, since it is unlikely that the situation can be rectified
      automatically.

   A summary of the Code-Reject packet format is shown below.  The
   fields are transmitted from left to right.

    0                   1                   2                   3
    0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
   |     Code      |  Identifier   |            Length             |
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
   | Rejected-Packet ...
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

   Code

      7 for Code-Reject.

   Identifier

      The Identifier field is one octet and is for use by the
      transmitter.




Perkins                                                        [Page 26]

RFC 1134                          PPP                      November 1989


   Rejected-Packet

      The Rejected-Packet field contains a copy of the LCP packet which
      is being rejected.  It begins with the rejected Code field; it
      does not include any PPP Data Link Layer headers.  The Rejected-
      Packet should be truncated to comply with the established value of
      the peer's MRU.

4.3.7.  Protocol-Reject

   Description

      Reception of a PPP frame with an unknown Data Link Layer Protocol
      indicates that the remote end is attempting to use a protocol
      which is unsupported at the local end.  This typically occurs when
      the remote end attempts to configure a new, but unsupported
      protocol.  If the LCP state machine is in the Open state, then
      this error MUST be reported back to the sender of the unknown
      protocol by transmitting a LCP packet with the Code field set to 8
      (Protocol-Reject), the Rejected-Protocol field set to the received
      Protocol, and the Data field filled with any desired data.

      Upon reception of a Protocol-Reject, a LCP implementation should
      stop transmitting frames of the indicated protocol.

      Protocol-Reject packets may only be sent in the LCP Open state.
      Protocol-Reject packets received in any state other than the LCP
      Open state should be discarded and no further action should be
      taken.

   A summary of the Protocol-Reject packet format is shown below.  The
   fields are transmitted from left to right.

    0                   1                   2                   3
    0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
   |     Code      |  Identifier   |            Length             |
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
   |       Rejected-Protocol       |      Rejected-Information ...
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

   Code

      8 for Protocol-Reject.

   Identifier

      The Identifier field is one octet and is for use by the



Perkins                                                        [Page 27]

RFC 1134                          PPP                      November 1989


      transmitter.

   Rejected-Protocol

      The Rejected-Protocol field is two octets and contains the
      Protocol of the Data Link Layer frame which is being rejected.

   Rejected-Information

      The Rejected-Information field contains a copy from the frame
      which is being rejected.  It begins with the Information field,
      and does not include any PPP Data Link Layer headers or the FCS.
      The Rejected-Information field should be truncated to comply with
      the established value of the peer's MRU.

4.3.8.  Echo-Request and Echo-Reply

   Description

      LCP includes Echo-Request and Echo-Reply Codes in order to provide
      a Data Link Layer loopback mechanism for use in exercising both
      directions of the link.  This is useful as an aid in debugging,
      link quality determination, performance testing, and for numerous
      other functions.

      An Echo-Request sender transmits a LCP packet with the Code field
      set to 9 (Echo-Request) and the Data field filled with any desired
      data, up to but not exceeding the receivers established MRU.

      Upon reception of an Echo-Request, a LCP packet MUST be
      transmitted with the Code field set to 10 (Echo-Reply), the
      Identifier field copied from the received Echo-Request, and the
      Data field copied from the Echo-Request, truncating as necessary
      to avoid exceeding the peer's established MRU.

      Echo-Request and Echo-Reply packets may only be sent in the LCP
      Open state.  Echo-Request and Echo-Reply packets received in any
      state other than the LCP Open state should be discarded and no
      further action should be taken.

   A summary of the Echo-Request and Echo-Reply packet formats is shown
   below.  The fields are transmitted from left to right.









Perkins                                                        [Page 28]

RFC 1134                          PPP                      November 1989


    0                   1                   2                   3
    0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
   |     Code      |  Identifier   |            Length             |
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
   |                         Magic-Number                          |
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
   |    Data ...
   +-+-+-+-+

   Code

      9 for Echo-Request;

      10 for Echo-Reply.

   Identifier

      The Identifier field is one octet and aids in matching Echo-
      Requests and Echo-Replies.

   Magic-Number

      The Magic-Number field is four octets and aids in detecting
      loopbacked links.  Unless modified by a Configuration Option, the
      Magic-Number MUST always be transmitted as zero and MUST always be
      ignored on reception.  Further use of the Magic-Number is beyond
      the scope of this discussion.

   Data

      The Data field is zero or more octets and contains uninterpreted
      data for use by the sender.  The data may consist of any binary
      value and may be of any length from zero to the established value
      for the peer's MRU.

4.3.9.  Discard-Request

   Description

      LCP includes a Discard-Request Code in order to provide a Data
      Link Layer data sink mechanism for use in exercising the local to
      remote direction of the link.  This is useful as an aid in
      debugging, performance testing, and and for numerous other
      functions.

      A discard sender transmits a LCP packet with the Code field set to
      11 (Discard-Request) and the Data field filled with any desired



Perkins                                                        [Page 29]

RFC 1134                          PPP                      November 1989


      data, up to but not exceeding the receivers established MRU.

      A discard receiver MUST simply throw away an Discard-Request that
      it receives.

      Discard-Request packets may only be sent in the LCP Open state.

   A summary of the Discard-Request packet formats is shown below.  The
   fields are transmitted from left to right.

    0                   1                   2                   3
    0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
   |     Code      |  Identifier   |            Length             |
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
   |                         Magic-Number                          |
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
   |    Data ...
   +-+-+-+-+

   Code

      11 for Discard-Request.

   Identifier

      The Identifier field is one octet and is for use by the Discard-
      Request transmitter.

   Magic-Number

      The Magic-Number field is four octets and aids in detecting
      loopbacked links.  Unless modified by a configuration option, the
      Magic-Number MUST always be transmitted as zero and MUST always be
      ignored on reception.  Further use of the Magic-Number is beyond
      the scope of this discussion.

   Data

      The Data field is zero or more octets and contains uninterpreted
      data for use by the sender.  The data may consist of any binary
      value and may be of any length from zero to the established value
      for the peer's MRU.

4.4.  Configuration Options

   LCP Configuration Options allow modifications to the standard
   characteristics of a point-to-point link to be negotiated.



Perkins                                                        [Page 30]

RFC 1134                          PPP                      November 1989


   Negotiable modifications include such things as the maximum receive
   unit, async control character mapping, the link authentication
   method, the link encryption method, etc..  The Configuration Options
   themselves are described in separate documents.  If a Configuration
   Option is not included in a Configure-Request packet, the default
   value for that Configuration Option is assumed.

   The end of the list of Configuration Options is indicated by the end
   of the LCP packet.

   Unless otherwise specified, a specific Configuration Options should
   be listed no more than once in a Configuration Options list.
   Specific Configuration Options may override this general rule and may
   be listed more than once.  The effect of this is Configuration Option
   specific and is specified by each such Configuration Option.

   Also unless otherwise specified, all Configuration Options apply in a
   half-duplex fashion.  When negotiated, they apply to only one
   direction of the link, typically in the receive direction when
   interpreted from the point of view of the Configure-Request sender.

4.4.1.  Format

   A summary of the Configuration Option format is shown below.  The
   fields are transmitted from left to right.

    0                   1
    0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
   |     Type      |    Length     |    Data ...
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

   Type

      The Type field is one octet and indicates the type of
      Configuration Option.  The most up-to-date values of the Type
      field are specified in the most recent "Assigned Numbers" RFC
      [11].

   Length

      The Length field is one octet and indicates the length of this
      Configuration Option including the Type, Length and Data fields.
      If a negotiable Configuration Option is received in a Configure-
      Request but with an invalid Length, a Configure-Nak should be
      transmitted which includes the desired Configuration Option with
      an appropriate Length and Data.




Perkins                                                        [Page 31]

RFC 1134                          PPP                      November 1989


   Data

      The Data field is zero or more octets and indicates the value or
      other information for this Configuration Option.  The format and
      length of the Data field is determined by the Type and Length
      fields.

5.  A PPP Network Control Protocol (NCP) for IP

   The IP Control Protocol (IPCP) is responsible for configuring,
   enabling, and disabling the IP protocol modules on both ends of the
   point-to-point link.  As with the Link Control Protocol, this is
   accomplished through an exchange of packets.  IPCP packets may not be
   exchanged until LCP has reached the network-layer Protocol
   Configuration Negotiation phase.  Likewise, IP datagrams may not be
   exchanged until IPCP has first opened the connection.

   The IP Control Protocol is exactly the same as the Link Control
   Protocol with the following exceptions:

   Data Link Layer Protocol Field

      Exactly one IP Control Protocol packet is encapsulated in the
      Information field of PPP Data Link Layer frames where the Protocol
      field indicates type hex 8021 (IP Control Protocol).

   Code field

      Only Codes 1 through 7 (Configure-Request, Configure-Ack,
      Configure-Nak, Configure-Reject, Terminate-Request, Terminate-Ack
      and Code-Reject) are used.  Other Codes should be treated as
      unrecognized and should result in Code-Rejects.

   Timeouts

      IPCP packets may not be exchanged until the Link Control Protocol
      has reached the network-layer Protocol Configuration Negotiation
      phase.  An implementation should be prepared to wait for Link
      Quality testing to finish before timing out waiting for a
      Configure-Ack or other response.  It is suggested that an
      implementation give up only after user intervention or a
      configurable amount of time.

   Configuration Option Types

      The IPCP has a separate set of Configuration Options.  The most
      up-to-date values of the type field are specified in the most
      recent "Assigned Numbers" RFC [11].



Perkins                                                        [Page 32]

RFC 1134                          PPP                      November 1989


5.1.  Sending IP Datagrams

   Before any IP packets may be communicated, both the Link Control
   Protocol and the IP Control Protocol must reach the Open state.

   Exactly one IP packet is encapsulated in the Information field of PPP
   Data Link Layer frames where the Protocol field indicates type hex
   0021 (Internet Protocol).

   The maximum length of an IP packet transmitted over a PPP link is the
   same as the maximum length of the Information field of a PPP data
   link layer frame.  Larger IP datagrams must be fragmented as
   necessary.  If a system wishes to avoid fragmentation and reassembly,
   it should use the TCP Maximum Segment Size option [12], or a similar
   mechanism, to discourage others from sending large datagrams.

A.  Asynchronous HDLC

   This appendix summarizes the modifications to ISO 3309-1979 proposed
   in ISO 3309:1984/PDAD1.  These modifications allow HDLC to be used
   with 8-bit asynchronous links.

   Transmission Considerations

      Each octet is delimited by a start and a stop element.

   Flag Sequence

      The Flag Sequence is a single octet and indicates the beginning or
      end of a frame.  The Flag Sequence consists of the binary sequence
      01111110 (hexadecimal 0x7e).

   Transparency

      On asynchronous links, a character stuffing procedure is used.
      The Control Escape octet is defined as binary 01111101
      (hexadecimal 0x7d) where the bit positions are numbered 87654321
      (not 76543210, BEWARE).

      After FCS computation, the transmitter examines the entire frame
      between the two Flag Sequences.  Each Flag Sequence, Control
      Escape octet and octet with value less than hexadecimal 0x20 is
      replaced by a two character sequence consisting of the Control
      Escape octet and the original octet with bit 6 complemented (i.e.,
      exclusive-or'd with hexadecimal 0x20).

      Prior to FCS computation, the receiver examines the entire frame
      between the two Flag Sequences.  For each Control Escape octet,



Perkins                                                        [Page 33]

RFC 1134                          PPP                      November 1989


      that octet is removed and bit 6 of the following octet is
      complemented.  A Control Escape octet immediately preceding the
      closing Flag Sequence indicates an invalid frame.

         Note: The inclusion of all octets less than hexadecimal 0x20
         allows all ASCII control characters [10] excluding DEL (Delete)
         to be transparently communicated through almost all known data
         communications equipment.

      A few examples may make this more clear.  Packet data is
      transmitted on the link as follows:

         0x7e is encoded as 0x7d, 0x5e.
         0x7d is encoded as 0x7d, 0x5d.
         0x01 is encoded as 0x7d, 0x21.

   Aborting a Transmission

      On asynchronous links, frames may be aborted by transmitting a "0"
      stop bit where a "1" bit is expected (framing error) or by
      transmitting a Control Escape octet followed immediately by a
      closing Flag Sequence.

   Inter-frame Time Fill

      On asynchronous links, inter-octet and inter-frame time fill
      should be accomplished by transmitting continuous "1" bits (mark-
      hold state).

         Note: On asynchronous links, inter-frame time fill can be
         viewed as extended inter-octet time fill.  Doing so can save
         one octet for every frame, decreasing delay and increasing
         bandwidth.  This is possible since a Flag Sequence may serve as
         both a frame close and a frame begin.  After having received
         any frame, an idle receiver will always be in a frame begin
         state.

         Robust transmitters should avoid using this trick over-
         zealously since the price for decreased delay is decreased
         reliability.  Noisy links may cause the receiver to receive
         garbage characters and interpret them as part of an incoming
         frame.  If the transmitter does not transmit a new opening Flag
         Sequence before sending the next frame, then that frame will be
         appended to the noise characters causing an invalid frame (with
         high reliability).  Transmitters should avoid this by
         transmitting an open Flag Sequence whenever "appreciable time"
         has elapsed since the prior closing Flag Sequence.  It is
         suggested that implementations will achieve the best results by



Perkins                                                        [Page 34]

RFC 1134                          PPP                      November 1989


         always sending an opening Flag Sequence if the new frame is not
         back-to-back with the last.  The maximum value for "appreciable
         time" is likely to be no greater than the typing rate of a slow
         to average typist, say 1 second.

B.  Fast Frame Check Sequence (FCS) Implementation

B.1.  FCS Computation Method

   The following code provides a table lookup computation for
   calculating the Frame Check Sequence as data arrives at the
   interface.  The table is created by the code in section 2.

   /*
    * FCS lookup table as calculated by the table generator in section 2.
    */
   static unsigned short fcstab[256] = {
        0x0000, 0x1189, 0x2312, 0x329b, 0x4624, 0x57ad, 0x6536, 0x74bf,
        0x8c48, 0x9dc1, 0xaf5a, 0xbed3, 0xca6c, 0xdbe5, 0xe97e, 0xf8f7,
        0x1081, 0x0108, 0x3393, 0x221a, 0x56a5, 0x472c, 0x75b7, 0x643e,
        0x9cc9, 0x8d40, 0xbfdb, 0xae52, 0xdaed, 0xcb64, 0xf9ff, 0xe876,
        0x2102, 0x308b, 0x0210, 0x1399, 0x6726, 0x76af, 0x4434, 0x55bd,
        0xad4a, 0xbcc3, 0x8e58, 0x9fd1, 0xeb6e, 0xfae7, 0xc87c, 0xd9f5,
        0x3183, 0x200a, 0x1291, 0x0318, 0x77a7, 0x662e, 0x54b5, 0x453c,
        0xbdcb, 0xac42, 0x9ed9, 0x8f50, 0xfbef, 0xea66, 0xd8fd, 0xc974,
        0x4204, 0x538d, 0x6116, 0x709f, 0x0420, 0x15a9, 0x2732, 0x36bb,
        0xce4c, 0xdfc5, 0xed5e, 0xfcd7, 0x8868, 0x99e1, 0xab7a, 0xbaf3,
        0x5285, 0x430c, 0x7197, 0x601e, 0x14a1, 0x0528, 0x37b3, 0x263a,
        0xdecd, 0xcf44, 0xfddf, 0xec56, 0x98e9, 0x8960, 0xbbfb, 0xaa72,
        0x6306, 0x728f, 0x4014, 0x519d, 0x2522, 0x34ab, 0x0630, 0x17b9,
        0xef4e, 0xfec7, 0xcc5c, 0xddd5, 0xa96a, 0xb8e3, 0x8a78, 0x9bf1,
        0x7387, 0x620e, 0x5095, 0x411c, 0x35a3, 0x242a, 0x16b1, 0x0738,
        0xffcf, 0xee46, 0xdcdd, 0xcd54, 0xb9eb, 0xa862, 0x9af9, 0x8b70,
        0x8408, 0x9581, 0xa71a, 0xb693, 0xc22c, 0xd3a5, 0xe13e, 0xf0b7,
        0x0840, 0x19c9, 0x2b52, 0x3adb, 0x4e64, 0x5fed, 0x6d76, 0x7cff,
        0x9489, 0x8500, 0xb79b, 0xa612, 0xd2ad, 0xc324, 0xf1bf, 0xe036,
        0x18c1, 0x0948, 0x3bd3, 0x2a5a, 0x5ee5, 0x4f6c, 0x7df7, 0x6c7e,
        0xa50a, 0xb483, 0x8618, 0x9791, 0xe32e, 0xf2a7, 0xc03c, 0xd1b5,
        0x2942, 0x38cb, 0x0a50, 0x1bd9, 0x6f66, 0x7eef, 0x4c74, 0x5dfd,
        0xb58b, 0xa402, 0x9699, 0x8710, 0xf3af, 0xe226, 0xd0bd, 0xc134,
        0x39c3, 0x284a, 0x1ad1, 0x0b58, 0x7fe7, 0x6e6e, 0x5cf5, 0x4d7c,
        0xc60c, 0xd785, 0xe51e, 0xf497, 0x8028, 0x91a1, 0xa33a, 0xb2b3,
        0x4a44, 0x5bcd, 0x6956, 0x78df, 0x0c60, 0x1de9, 0x2f72, 0x3efb,
        0xd68d, 0xc704, 0xf59f, 0xe416, 0x90a9, 0x8120, 0xb3bb, 0xa232,
        0x5ac5, 0x4b4c, 0x79d7, 0x685e, 0x1ce1, 0x0d68, 0x3ff3, 0x2e7a,
        0xe70e, 0xf687, 0xc41c, 0xd595, 0xa12a, 0xb0a3, 0x8238, 0x93b1,
        0x6b46, 0x7acf, 0x4854, 0x59dd, 0x2d62, 0x3ceb, 0x0e70, 0x1ff9,
        0xf78f, 0xe606, 0xd49d, 0xc514, 0xb1ab, 0xa022, 0x92b9, 0x8330,



Perkins                                                        [Page 35]

RFC 1134                          PPP                      November 1989


        0x7bc7, 0x6a4e, 0x58d5, 0x495c, 0x3de3, 0x2c6a, 0x1ef1, 0x0f78
   };

   #define PPPINITFCS      0xffff  /* Initial FCS value */
   #define PPPGOODFCS      0xf0b8  /* Good final FCS value */


   /*
    * Calculate a new fcs given the current fcs and the new data.
    */
   unsigned short pppfcs(fcs, cp, len)
       register unsigned short fcs;
       register unsigned char *cp;
       register int len;
   {
       while (len--)
           fcs = (fcs >> 8) ^ fcstab[(fcs ^ *cp++) & 0xff];

       return (fcs);
   }

B.2.  Fast FCS table generator

   The following code creates the lookup table used to calculate the
   FCS.

   /*
    * Generate a FCS table for the HDLC FCS.
    *
    * Drew D. Perkins at Carnegie Mellon University.
    *
    * Code liberally borrowed from Mohsen Banan and D. Hugh Redelmeier.
    */

   /*
    * The HDLC polynomial: x**0 + x**5 + x**12 + x**16 (0x8408).
    */
   #define P       0x8408


   main()
   {
       register unsigned int b, v;
       register int i;

       printf("static unsigned short fcstab[256] = {");
       for (b = 0; ; ) {
           if (b % 8 == 0)



Perkins                                                        [Page 36]

RFC 1134                          PPP                      November 1989


               printf("0);

           v = b;
           for (i = 8; i--; )
               v = v & 1 ? (v >> 1) ^ P : v >> 1;

           printf("0x%04x", v & 0xFFFF);

           if (++b == 256)
               break;
           printf(",");
       }
      printf("0;0);
   }


References

  [1]  Electronic Industries Association, "Interface Between Data
       Terminal Equipment and Data Communications Equipment Employing
       Serial Binary Data Interchange", EIA Standard RS-232-C, August
       1969.

  [2]  International Organization For Standardization, "Data
       Communication - High-level Data Link Control Procedures - Frame
       Structure", ISO Standard 3309-1979, 1979.

  [3]  International Organization For Standardization, "Data
       Communication - High-level Data Link Control Procedures -
       Elements of Procedures", ISO Standard 4335-1979, 1979.

  [4]  International Organization For Standardization, "Data
       Communication - High-Level Data Link Control Procedures -
       Elements of Procedures - Addendum 1", ISO Standard 4335-
       1979/Addendum 1, 1979.

  [5]  International Organization For Standardization, "Information
       Processing Systems - Data Communication - High-level Data Link
       Control Procedures - Frame structure - Addendum 1: Start/stop
       Transmission", Proposed Draft International Standard ISO
       3309:1983/PDAD1, 1984.

  [6]  International Telecommunication Union, CCITT Recommendation X.25,
       "Interface Between Data Terminal Equipment (DTE) and Data Circuit
       Terminating Equipment (DCE) for Terminals Operating in the Packet
       Mode on Public Data Networks", CCITT Red Book, Volume VIII,
       Fascicle VIII.3, Rec. X.25., October 1984.




Perkins                                                        [Page 37]

RFC 1134                          PPP                      November 1989


  [7]  Perez, "Byte-wise CRC Calculations", IEEE Micro, June 1983.
       Morse, G., "Calculating CRC's by Bits and Bytes", Byte, September
       1986.

  [8]  LeVan, J., "A Fast CRC", Byte, November 1987.

  [9]  American National Standards Institute, "American National
       Standard Code for Information Interchange", ANSI X3.4-1977, 1977.

 [10]  Postel, J., "Internet Protocol", RFC 791, USC/Information
       Sciences Institute, September 1981.

 [11]  Reynolds, J.K., and J. Postel, "Assigned Numbers", RFC 1010,
       USC/Information Sciences Institute, May 1987.

 [12]  Postel, J., "The TCP Maximum Segment Size Option and Related
       Topics", RFC 879, USC/Information Sciences Institute, November
       1983.

Security Considerations

   Security issues are not addressed in this memo.

Author's Address

   This proposal is the product of the Point-to-Point Protocol Working
   Group of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF). The working
   group can be contacted via the chair:

   Russ Hobby
   UC Davis
   Computing Services
   Davis, CA 95616

   Phone: (916) 752-0236

   EMail: rdhobby@ucdavis.edu

Acknowledgments

   Many people spent significant time helping to develop the Point-to-
   Point Protocol.  The complete list of people is too numerous to list,
   but the following people deserve special thanks: Ken Adelman (TGV),
   Craig Fox (NSC), Phill Gross (NRI), Russ Hobby (UC Davis), David
   Kaufman (Proteon), John LoVerso (Xylogics), Bill Melohn (Sun
   Microsystems), Mike Patton (MIT), Drew Perkins (CMU), Greg Satz
   (cisco systems) and Asher Waldfogel (Wellfleet).




Perkins                                                        [Page 38]