File: rfc1294.txt

package info (click to toggle)
doc-rfc 20181229-2
  • links: PTS, VCS
  • area: non-free
  • in suites: buster
  • size: 570,944 kB
  • sloc: xml: 285,646; sh: 107; python: 90; perl: 42; makefile: 14
file content (1571 lines) | stat: -rw-r--r-- 54,992 bytes parent folder | download | duplicates (9)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
543
544
545
546
547
548
549
550
551
552
553
554
555
556
557
558
559
560
561
562
563
564
565
566
567
568
569
570
571
572
573
574
575
576
577
578
579
580
581
582
583
584
585
586
587
588
589
590
591
592
593
594
595
596
597
598
599
600
601
602
603
604
605
606
607
608
609
610
611
612
613
614
615
616
617
618
619
620
621
622
623
624
625
626
627
628
629
630
631
632
633
634
635
636
637
638
639
640
641
642
643
644
645
646
647
648
649
650
651
652
653
654
655
656
657
658
659
660
661
662
663
664
665
666
667
668
669
670
671
672
673
674
675
676
677
678
679
680
681
682
683
684
685
686
687
688
689
690
691
692
693
694
695
696
697
698
699
700
701
702
703
704
705
706
707
708
709
710
711
712
713
714
715
716
717
718
719
720
721
722
723
724
725
726
727
728
729
730
731
732
733
734
735
736
737
738
739
740
741
742
743
744
745
746
747
748
749
750
751
752
753
754
755
756
757
758
759
760
761
762
763
764
765
766
767
768
769
770
771
772
773
774
775
776
777
778
779
780
781
782
783
784
785
786
787
788
789
790
791
792
793
794
795
796
797
798
799
800
801
802
803
804
805
806
807
808
809
810
811
812
813
814
815
816
817
818
819
820
821
822
823
824
825
826
827
828
829
830
831
832
833
834
835
836
837
838
839
840
841
842
843
844
845
846
847
848
849
850
851
852
853
854
855
856
857
858
859
860
861
862
863
864
865
866
867
868
869
870
871
872
873
874
875
876
877
878
879
880
881
882
883
884
885
886
887
888
889
890
891
892
893
894
895
896
897
898
899
900
901
902
903
904
905
906
907
908
909
910
911
912
913
914
915
916
917
918
919
920
921
922
923
924
925
926
927
928
929
930
931
932
933
934
935
936
937
938
939
940
941
942
943
944
945
946
947
948
949
950
951
952
953
954
955
956
957
958
959
960
961
962
963
964
965
966
967
968
969
970
971
972
973
974
975
976
977
978
979
980
981
982
983
984
985
986
987
988
989
990
991
992
993
994
995
996
997
998
999
1000
1001
1002
1003
1004
1005
1006
1007
1008
1009
1010
1011
1012
1013
1014
1015
1016
1017
1018
1019
1020
1021
1022
1023
1024
1025
1026
1027
1028
1029
1030
1031
1032
1033
1034
1035
1036
1037
1038
1039
1040
1041
1042
1043
1044
1045
1046
1047
1048
1049
1050
1051
1052
1053
1054
1055
1056
1057
1058
1059
1060
1061
1062
1063
1064
1065
1066
1067
1068
1069
1070
1071
1072
1073
1074
1075
1076
1077
1078
1079
1080
1081
1082
1083
1084
1085
1086
1087
1088
1089
1090
1091
1092
1093
1094
1095
1096
1097
1098
1099
1100
1101
1102
1103
1104
1105
1106
1107
1108
1109
1110
1111
1112
1113
1114
1115
1116
1117
1118
1119
1120
1121
1122
1123
1124
1125
1126
1127
1128
1129
1130
1131
1132
1133
1134
1135
1136
1137
1138
1139
1140
1141
1142
1143
1144
1145
1146
1147
1148
1149
1150
1151
1152
1153
1154
1155
1156
1157
1158
1159
1160
1161
1162
1163
1164
1165
1166
1167
1168
1169
1170
1171
1172
1173
1174
1175
1176
1177
1178
1179
1180
1181
1182
1183
1184
1185
1186
1187
1188
1189
1190
1191
1192
1193
1194
1195
1196
1197
1198
1199
1200
1201
1202
1203
1204
1205
1206
1207
1208
1209
1210
1211
1212
1213
1214
1215
1216
1217
1218
1219
1220
1221
1222
1223
1224
1225
1226
1227
1228
1229
1230
1231
1232
1233
1234
1235
1236
1237
1238
1239
1240
1241
1242
1243
1244
1245
1246
1247
1248
1249
1250
1251
1252
1253
1254
1255
1256
1257
1258
1259
1260
1261
1262
1263
1264
1265
1266
1267
1268
1269
1270
1271
1272
1273
1274
1275
1276
1277
1278
1279
1280
1281
1282
1283
1284
1285
1286
1287
1288
1289
1290
1291
1292
1293
1294
1295
1296
1297
1298
1299
1300
1301
1302
1303
1304
1305
1306
1307
1308
1309
1310
1311
1312
1313
1314
1315
1316
1317
1318
1319
1320
1321
1322
1323
1324
1325
1326
1327
1328
1329
1330
1331
1332
1333
1334
1335
1336
1337
1338
1339
1340
1341
1342
1343
1344
1345
1346
1347
1348
1349
1350
1351
1352
1353
1354
1355
1356
1357
1358
1359
1360
1361
1362
1363
1364
1365
1366
1367
1368
1369
1370
1371
1372
1373
1374
1375
1376
1377
1378
1379
1380
1381
1382
1383
1384
1385
1386
1387
1388
1389
1390
1391
1392
1393
1394
1395
1396
1397
1398
1399
1400
1401
1402
1403
1404
1405
1406
1407
1408
1409
1410
1411
1412
1413
1414
1415
1416
1417
1418
1419
1420
1421
1422
1423
1424
1425
1426
1427
1428
1429
1430
1431
1432
1433
1434
1435
1436
1437
1438
1439
1440
1441
1442
1443
1444
1445
1446
1447
1448
1449
1450
1451
1452
1453
1454
1455
1456
1457
1458
1459
1460
1461
1462
1463
1464
1465
1466
1467
1468
1469
1470
1471
1472
1473
1474
1475
1476
1477
1478
1479
1480
1481
1482
1483
1484
1485
1486
1487
1488
1489
1490
1491
1492
1493
1494
1495
1496
1497
1498
1499
1500
1501
1502
1503
1504
1505
1506
1507
1508
1509
1510
1511
1512
1513
1514
1515
1516
1517
1518
1519
1520
1521
1522
1523
1524
1525
1526
1527
1528
1529
1530
1531
1532
1533
1534
1535
1536
1537
1538
1539
1540
1541
1542
1543
1544
1545
1546
1547
1548
1549
1550
1551
1552
1553
1554
1555
1556
1557
1558
1559
1560
1561
1562
1563
1564
1565
1566
1567
1568
1569
1570
1571






Network Working Group                                         T. Bradley
Request for Comments: 1294                                      C. Brown
                                          Wellfleet Communications, Inc.
                                                                A. Malis
                                                      BBN Communications
                                                            January 1992

              Multiprotocol Interconnect over Frame Relay

1.  Status of this Memo

   This RFC specifies an IAB standards track protocol for the Internet
   community, and requests discussion and suggestions for improvements.
   Please refer to the current edition of the "IAB Official Protocol
   Standards" for the standardization state and status of this protocol.
   Distribution of this memo is unlimited.

2.  Abstract

   This memo describes an encapsulation method for carrying network
   interconnect traffic over a Frame Relay backbone.  It covers aspects
   of both Bridging and Routing.  Systems with the ability to transfer
   both this encapsulation method, and others must have a priori
   knowledge of which virtual circuits will carry which encapsulation
   method and this encapsulation must only be used over virtual circuits
   that have been explicitly configured for its use.

3.  Acknowledgements

   Comments and contributions from many sources, especially those from
   Ray Samora of Proteon, Ken Rehbehn of Netrix Corporation, Fred Baker
   and Charles Carvalho of Advanced Computer Communications and Mostafa
   Sherif of AT&T have been incorporated into this document. Special
   thanks to Dory Leifer of University of Michigan for his contributions
   to the resolution of fragmentation issues. This document could not
   have been completed without the expertise of the IP over Large Public
   Data Networks working group of the IETF.

4.  Conventions

   The following language conventions are used in the items of
   specification in this document:

     o Must, Shall or Mandatory -- the item is an absolute
       requirement of the specification.

     o Should or Recommended -- the item should generally be
       followed for all but exceptional circumstances.



Bradley, Brown, Malis                                           [Page 1]

RFC 1294             Multiprotocol over Frame Relay         January 1992


     o May or Optional -- the item is truly optional and may be
       followed or ignored according to the needs of the
       implementor.

5.  Introduction

   The following discussion applies to those devices which serve as end
   stations (DTEs) on a public or private Frame Relay network (for
   example, provided by a common carrier or PTT).  It will not discuss
   the behavior of those stations that are considered a part of the
   Frame Relay network (DCEs) other than to explain situations in which
   the DTE must react.

   The Frame Relay network provides a number of virtual circuits that
   form the basis for connections between stations attached to the same
   Frame Relay network.  The resulting set of interconnected devices
   forms a private Frame Relay group which may be either fully
   interconnected with a complete "mesh" of virtual circuits, or only
   partially interconnected.  In either case, each virtual circuit is
   uniquely identified at each Frame Relay interface by a Data Link
   Connection Identifier (DLCI).  In most circumstances DLCIs have
   strictly local significance at each Frame Relay interface.

   The specifications in this document are intended to apply to both
   switched and permanent virtual circuits.

6.  Frame Format

   All protocols must encapsulate their packets within a Q.922 Annex A
   frame [1,2].  Additionally, frames shall contain information
   necessary to identify the protocol carried within the Protocol Data
   Unit (PDU), thus allowing the receiver to properly process the
   incoming packet.  The format shall be as follows:


















Bradley, Brown, Malis                                           [Page 2]

RFC 1294             Multiprotocol over Frame Relay         January 1992


         +-----------------------------+
         |    flag (7E hexadecimal)    |
         +-----------------------------+
         |       Q.922 Address*        |
         +--                         --+
         |                             |
         +-----------------------------+
         | Control (UI = 0x03)         |
         +-----------------------------+
         | Optional Pad(s)   (0x00)    |
         +-----------------------------+
         | NLPID                       |
         +-----------------------------+
         |             .               |
         |             .               |
         |             .               |
         |           Data              |
         |             .               |
         |             .               |
         +-----------------------------+
         |   Frame Check Sequence      |
         +--           .             --+
         |       (two octets)          |
         +-----------------------------+
         |   flag (7E hexadecimal)     |
         +-----------------------------+

      * Q.922 addresses, as presently defined, are two octets and
        contain a 10-bit DLCI.  In some networks Q.922 addresses may
        optionally be increased to three or four octets.

   The control field is the Q.922 control field.  The UI (0x03) value is
   used unless it is negotiated otherwise.  The use of XID (0xAF or
   0xBF) is permitted and is discussed later.

   The pad field is an optional field used to align the remainder of the
   frame to a convenient boundary for the sender.  There may be zero or
   more pad octets within the pad field and all must have a value of
   zero.

   The Network Level Protocol ID (NLPID) field is administered by ISO
   and CCITT.  It contains values for many different protocols including
   IP, CLNP and IEEE Subnetwork Access Protocol (SNAP)[10]. This field
   tells the receiver what encapsulation or what protocol follows.
   Values for this field are defined in ISO/IEC TR 9577 [3]. A NLPID
   value of 0x00 is defined within ISO/IEC TR 9577 as the Null Network
   Layer or Inactive Set.  Since it cannot be distinguished from a pad
   field, and because it has no significance within the context of this



Bradley, Brown, Malis                                           [Page 3]

RFC 1294             Multiprotocol over Frame Relay         January 1992


   encapsulation scheme, a NLPID value of 0x00 is invalid under the
   Frame Relay encapsulation. The known NLPID values are listed in the
   Appendix.

   For full interoperability with older Frame Relay encapsulation
   formats, a station may implement section 15, Backward Compatibility.

   There is no commonly implemented maximum frame size for Frame Relay.
   A network must, however, support at least a 262 octet maximum.
   Generally, the maximum will be greater than or equal to 1600 octets,
   but each Frame Relay provider will specify an appropriate value for
   its network.  A Frame Relay DTE, therefore, must allow the maximum
   acceptable frame size to be configurable.

   The minimum frame size allowed for Frame Relay is five octets between
   the opening and closing flags.

7.  Interconnect Issues

   There are two basic types of data packets that travel within the
   Frame Relay network, routed packets and bridged packets.  These
   packets have distinct formats and therefore, must contain an
   indication that the destination may use to correctly interpret the
   contents of the frame.  This indication is embedded within the NLPID
   and SNAP header information.

   For those protocols that do not have a NLPID already assigned, it is
   necessary to provide a mechanism to allow easy protocol
   identification.  There is a NLPID value defined indicating the
   presence of a SNAP header.

   A SNAP header is of the form

         +-------------------------------+
         | Organizationally Unique       |
         +--             +---------------+
         | Identifier    | Protocol      |
         +---------------+---------------+
         | Identifier    |
         +---------------+

   All stations must be able to accept and properly interpret both the
   NLPID encapsulation and the SNAP header encapsulation for a routed
   packet.

   The three-octet Organizationally Unique Identifier (OUI) identifies
   an organization which administers the meaning of the Protocol
   Identifier (PID) which follows.  Together they identify a distinct



Bradley, Brown, Malis                                           [Page 4]

RFC 1294             Multiprotocol over Frame Relay         January 1992


   protocol.  Note that OUI 0x00-00-00 specifies that the following PID
   is an EtherType.

7.1.  Routed Frames

   Some protocols will have an assigned NLPID, but because the NLPID
   numbering space is so limited many protocols do not have a specific
   NLPID assigned to them. When packets of such protocols are routed
   over Frame Relay networks they are sent using the NLPID 0x80 (which
   indicates a SNAP follows), OUI 0x00-00-00 (which indicates an
   EtherType follows), and the EtherType of the protocol in use.

             Format of Routed Frames
         +-------------------------------+
         |        Q.922 Address          |
         +-------------------------------+
         |Control  0x03  | pad(s)  0x00  |
         +-------------------------------+
         | NLPID   0x80  | OUI     0x00  |
         +---------------+             --+
         | OUI  0x00-00                  |
         +-------------------------------+
         |           EtherType           |
         +-------------------------------+
         |         Protocol Data         |
         +-------------------------------+
         | FCS                           |
         +-------------------------------+

   In the few cases when a protocol has an assigned NLPID (see
   appendix), 48 bits can be saved using the format below:

          Format of Routed NLPID Protocol
         +-------------------------------+
         |        Q.922 Address          |
         +-------------------------------+
         |Control  0x03  |     NLPID     |
         +-------------------------------+
         |         Protocol Data         |
         +-------------------------------+
         | FCS                           |
         +-------------------------------+









Bradley, Brown, Malis                                           [Page 5]

RFC 1294             Multiprotocol over Frame Relay         January 1992


   In the particular case of an Internet IP datagram, the NLPID is 0xCC.

           Format of Routed IP Datagram
         +-------------------------------+
         |        Q.922 Address          |
         +-------------------------------+
         |Control  0x03  |  NLPID  0xCC  |
         +-------------------------------+
         |          IP Datagram          |
         +-------------------------------+
         | FCS                           |
         +-------------------------------+

7.2.  Bridged Frames

   The second type of Frame Relay traffic is bridged packets. These
   packets are encapsulated using the NLPID value of 0x80 indicating
   SNAP and the following SNAP header identifies the format of the
   bridged packet.  The OUI value used for this encapsulation is the
   802.1 organization code 0x00-80-C2.  The following two octets (PID)
   specify the form of the MAC header, which immediately follows the
   SNAP header.  Additionally, the PID indicates whether the original
   FCS is preserved within the bridged frame.

   The 802.1 organization has reserved the following values to be used
   with Frame Relay:

            PID Values for OUI 0x00-80-C2

         with preserved FCS   w/o preserved FCS    Media
         ------------------   -----------------    ----------------
         0x00-01              0x00-07              802.3/Ethernet
         0x00-02              0x00-08              802.4
         0x00-03              0x00-09              802.5
         0x00-04              0x00-0A              FDDI
         0x00-05              0x00-0B              802.6

      In addition, the PID value 0x00-0E, when used with OUI 0x00-80-C2,
      identifies Bridged Protocol Data Units (BPDUs).

   A packet bridged over Frame Relay will, therefore, have one of the
   following formats:









Bradley, Brown, Malis                                           [Page 6]

RFC 1294             Multiprotocol over Frame Relay         January 1992


          Format of Bridged Ethernet/802.3 Frame
         +-------------------------------+
         |        Q.922 Address          |
         +-------------------------------+
         |Control  0x03  | pad(s)  0x00  |
         +-------------------------------+
         | NLPID   0x80  | OUI     0x00  |
         +---------------+             --+
         | OUI  0x80-C2                  |
         +-------------------------------+
         | PID 0x00-01 or 0x00-07        |
         +-------------------------------+
         | MAC destination address       |
         +-------------------------------+
         | (remainder of MAC frame)       |
         +-------------------------------+
         | LAN FCS (if PID is 0x00-01)   |
         +-------------------------------+
         | FCS                           |
         +-------------------------------+

          Format of Bridged 802.4 Frame
         +-------------------------------+
         |        Q.922 Address          |
         +-------------------------------+
         |Control  0x03  | pad(s)  0x00  |
         +-------------------------------+
         | NLPID   0x80  | OUI     0x00  |
         +---------------+             --+
         | OUI  0x80-C2                  |
         +-------------------------------+
         | PID 0x00-02 or 0x00-08        |
         +-------------------------------+
         |  pad  0x00    | Frame Control |
         +-------------------------------+
         | MAC destination address       |
         +-------------------------------+
         | (remainder of MAC frame)      |
         +-------------------------------+
         | LAN FCS (if PID is 0x00-02)   |
         +-------------------------------+
         | FCS                           |
         +-------------------------------+








Bradley, Brown, Malis                                           [Page 7]

RFC 1294             Multiprotocol over Frame Relay         January 1992


          Format of Bridged 802.5 Frame
         +-------------------------------+
         |        Q.922 Address          |
         +-------------------------------+
         |Control  0x03  | pad(s)  0x00  |
         +-------------------------------+
         | NLPID   0x80  | OUI     0x00  |
         +---------------+             --+
         | OUI  0x80-C2                  |
         +-------------------------------+
         | PID 0x00-03 or 0x00-09        |
         +-------------------------------+
         | Access Control| Frame Control |
         +-------------------------------+
         | MAC destination address       |
         |             .                 |
         |             .                 |
         +-------------------------------+
         | (remainder of MAC frame)      |
         +-------------------------------+
         | LAN FCS (if PID is 0x00-03)   |
         |                               |
         +-------------------------------+
         | FCS                           |
         +-------------------------------+


























Bradley, Brown, Malis                                           [Page 8]

RFC 1294             Multiprotocol over Frame Relay         January 1992


           Format of Bridged FDDI Frame
         +-------------------------------+
         |        Q.922 Address          |
         +-------------------------------+
         |Control  0x03  | pad(s)  0x00  |
         +-------------------------------+
         | NLPID   0x80  | OUI     0x00  |
         +---------------+             --+
         | OUI  0x80-C2                  |
         +-------------------------------+
         | PID 0x00-04 or 0x00-0A        |
         +-------------------------------+
         | Access Control| Frame Control |
         +-------------------------------+
         | MAC destination address       |
         |             .                 |
         |             .                 |
         +-------------------------------+
         | (remainder of MAC frame)      |
         +-------------------------------+
         | LAN FCS (if PID is 0x00-04)   |
         |                               |
         +-------------------------------+
         | FCS                           |
         +-------------------------------+


























Bradley, Brown, Malis                                           [Page 9]

RFC 1294             Multiprotocol over Frame Relay         January 1992


           Format of Bridged 802.6 Frame
         +-------------------------------+
         |        Q.922 Address          |
         | Control 0x03  | pad(s)  0x00  |
         +-------------------------------+
         | NLPID   0x80  | OUI     0x00  |
         +---------------+             --+
         | OUI  0x80-C2                  |
         +-------------------------------+
         | PID 0x00-05 or 0x00-0B        |
         +-------------------------------+
         |   Reserved    |     BEtag     |  Common
         +---------------+---------------+  PDU
         |            BAsize             |  Header
         +-------------------------------+
         | MAC destination address       |
         +-------------------------------+
         | (remainder of MAC frame)      |
         +-------------------------------+
         |                               |
         +-    Common PDU Trailer       -+
         |                               |
         +-------------------------------+
         | FCS                           |
         +-------------------------------+

      The Common Protocol Data Unit (PDU) Header and Trailer are
      conveyed to allow pipelining at the egress bridge to an 802.6
      subnetwork.  Specifically, the Common PDU Header contains the
      BAsize field, which contains the length of the PDU.  If this field
      is not available to the egress 802.6 bridge, then that bridge
      cannot begin to transmit the segmented PDU until it has received
      the entire PDU, calculated the length, and inserted the length
      into the BAsize field.  If the field is available, the egress
      802.6 bridge can extract the length from the BAsize field of the
      Common PDU Header, insert it into the corresponding field of the
      first segment, and immediately transmit the segment onto the 802.6
      subnetwork.  Thus, the bridge can begin transmitting the 802.6 PDU
      before it has received the complete PDU.

      One should note that the Common PDU Header and Trailer of the
      encapsulated frame should not be simply copied to the outgoing
      802.6 subnetwork because the encapsulated BEtag value may conflict
      with the previous BEtag value transmitted by that bridge.







Bradley, Brown, Malis                                          [Page 10]

RFC 1294             Multiprotocol over Frame Relay         January 1992


          Format of BPDU Frame
      +-------------------------------+
      |        Q.922 Address          |
      +-------------------------------+
      |Control  0x03  | pad(s)  0x00  |
      +-------------------------------+
      | NLPID   0x80  | OUI     0x00  |
      +---------------+             --+
      | OUI  0x80-C2                  |
      +-------------------------------+
      | PID 0x00-0E                   |
      +-------------------------------+  ----
      | 802.1(d) Protocol Identifier  |  BPDU, as defined
      +-------------------------------+  by 802.1(d),
      | Version = 00  |  BPDU Type    |  section 5.3
      +-------------------------------+
      | (remainder of BPDU)           |
      +-------------------------------+  ----
      | FCS                           |
      +-------------------------------+

8.  Data Link Layer Parameter Negotiation

   Frame Relay stations may choose to support the Exchange
   Identification (XID) specified in Appendix III of Q.922 [1].  This
   XID exchange allows the following parameters to be negotiated at the
   initialization of a Frame Relay circuit: maximum frame size N201,
   retransmission timer T200, and the maximum number of outstanding I
   frames K.

   A station may indicate its unwillingness to support acknowledged mode
   multiple frame operation by specifying a value of zero for the
   maximum window size, K.

   If this exchange is not used, these values must be statically
   configured by mutual agreement of Data Link Connection (DLC)
   endpoints, or must be defaulted to the values specified in Section
   5.9 of Q.922:

                  N201: 260 octets

                     K:  3 for a 16 Kbps link,
                         7 for a 64 Kbps link,
                        32 for a 384 Kbps link,
                        40 for a 1.536 Mbps or above link

                  T200: 1.5 seconds [see Q.922 for further details]




Bradley, Brown, Malis                                          [Page 11]

RFC 1294             Multiprotocol over Frame Relay         January 1992


   If a station supporting XID receives an XID frame, it shall respond
   with an XID response.  In processing an XID, if the remote maximum
   frame size is smaller than the local maximum, the local system shall
   reduce the maximum size it uses over this DLC to the remotely
   specified value.  Note that this shall be done before generating a
   response XID.

   The following diagram describes the use of XID to specify non-use of
   acknowledged mode multiple frame operation.










































Bradley, Brown, Malis                                          [Page 12]

RFC 1294             Multiprotocol over Frame Relay         January 1992


      Non-use of Acknowledged Mode Multiple Frame Operation
             +---------------+
             |    Address    |     (2,3 or 4 octets)
             |               |
             +---------------+
             | Control 0xAF  |
             +---------------+
             | format  0x82  |
             +---------------+
             | Group ID 0x80 |
             +---------------+
             | Group Length  |     (2 octets)
             |    0x00-0E    |
             +---------------+
             |      0x05     |     PI = Frame Size (transmit)
             +---------------+
             |      0x02     |     PL = 2
             +---------------+
             |    Maximum    |     (2 octets)
             |   Frame Size  |
             +---------------+
             |      0x06     |     PI = Frame Size (receive)
             +---------------+
             |      0x02     |     PL = 2
             +---------------+
             |    Maximum    |     (2 octets)
             |   Frame Size  |
             +---------------+
             |      0x07     |     PI = Window Size
             +---------------+
             |      0x01     |     PL = 1
             +---------------+
             |      0x00     |
             +---------------+
             |      0x09     |     PI = Retransmission Timer
             +---------------+
             |      0x01     |     PL = 1
             +---------------+
             |      0x00     |
             +---------------+
             |      FCS      |     (2 octets)
             |               |
             +---------------+








Bradley, Brown, Malis                                          [Page 13]

RFC 1294             Multiprotocol over Frame Relay         January 1992


9.  Fragmentation Issues

   Fragmentation allows the exchange of packets that are greater than
   the maximum frame size supported by the underlying network.  In the
   case of Frame Relay, the network may support a maximum frame size as
   small as 262 octets.  Because of this small maximum size, it is
   advantageous to support fragmentation and reassembly.

   Unlike IP fragmentation procedures, the scope of Frame Relay
   fragmentation procedure is limited to the boundary (or DTEs) of the
   Frame Relay network.

   The general format of fragmented packets is the same as any other
   encapsulated protocol.  The most significant difference being that
   the fragmented packet will contain the encapsulation header.  That
   is, a packet is first encapsulated (with the exception of the address
   and control fields) as defined above. Large packets are then broken
   up into frames appropriate for the given Frame Relay network and are
   encapsulated using the Frame Relay fragmentation format.  In this
   way, a station receiving fragments may reassemble them and then put
   the reassembled packet through the same processing path as a packet
   that had not been fragmented.

   Within Frame Relay fragments are encapsulated using the SNAP format
   with an OUI of 0x00-80-C2 and a PID of 0x00-0D.  Individual fragments
   will, therefore, have the following format:

























Bradley, Brown, Malis                                          [Page 14]

RFC 1294             Multiprotocol over Frame Relay         January 1992


          +---------------+---------------+
          |         Q.922 Address         |
          +---------------+---------------+
          | Control 0x03  | pad     0x00  |
          +---------------+---------------+
          | NLPID   0x80  | OUI     0x00  |
          +---------------+---------------+
          | OUI                  0x80-C2  |
          +---------------+---------------+
          | PID                  0x00-0D  |
          +---------------+---------------+
          |        sequence number        |
          +---------------+---------------+
          |F| RSVD  |offset               |
          +---------------+---------------+
          |    fragment data              |
          |               .               |
          |               .               |
          |               .               |
          +---------------+---------------+
          |              FCS              |
          +---------------+---------------+

   The sequence field is a two octet identifier that is incremented
   every time a new complete message is fragmented.  It allows detection
   of lost frames and is set to a random value at initialization.

   The reserved field is 4 bits long and is not currently defined.  It
   must be set to 0.

   The final bit is a one bit field set to 1 on the last fragment and
   set to 0 for all other fragments.

   The offset field is an 11 bit value representing the logical offset
   of this fragment in bytes divided by 32. The first fragment must have
   an offset of zero.

   The following figure shows how a large IP datagram is fragmented over
   Frame Relay.  In this example, the complete datagram is fragmented
   into two Frame Relay frames.











Bradley, Brown, Malis                                          [Page 15]

RFC 1294             Multiprotocol over Frame Relay         January 1992


                        Frame Relay Fragmentation Example
                                           +-----------+-----------+
                                           |     Q.922 Address     |
                                           +-----------+-----------+
                                           | Ctrl 0x03 | pad  0x00 |
                                           +-----------+-----------+
                                           |NLPID 0x80 | OUI 0x00  |
                                           +-----------+-----------+
                                           | OUI          0x80-C2  |
         +-----------+-----------+         +-----------+-----------+
         | pad 0x00  |NLPID 0xCC |         | PID          0x00-0D  |
         +-----------+-----------+         +-----------+-----------+
         |                       |         | sequence number   n   |
         |                       |         +-----------+-----------+
         |                       |         |0| RSVD |offset (0)    |
         |                       |         +-----------+-----------+
         |                       |         | pad 0x00  |NLPID 0xCC |
         |                       |         +-----------+-----------+
         |                       |         |   first m bytes of    |
         |  large IP datagram    |   ...   |     IP datagram       |
         |                       |         |                       |
         |                       |         +-----------+-----------+
         |                       |         |          FCS          |
         |                       |         +-----------+-----------+
         |                       |
         |                       |         +-----------+-----------+
         |                       |         |     Q.922 Address     |
         |                       |         +-----------+-----------+
         |                       |         | Ctrl 0x03 | pad  0x00 |
         +-----------+-----------+         +-----------+-----------+
                                           |NLPID 0x80 | OUI 0x00  |
                                           +-----------+-----------+
                                           | OUI          0x80-C2  |
                                           +-----------+-----------+
                                           | PID          0x00-0D  |
                                           +-----------+-----------+
                                           | sequence number   n   |
                                           +-----------+-----------+
                                           |1| RSVD |offset (m/32) |
                                           +-----------+-----------+
                                           |    remainder of IP    |
                                           |        datagram       |
                                           +-----------+-----------+
                                           |          FCS          |
                                           +-----------+-----------+

   Fragments must be sent in order starting with a zero offset and
   ending with the final fragment.  These fragments must not be



Bradley, Brown, Malis                                          [Page 16]

RFC 1294             Multiprotocol over Frame Relay         January 1992


   interrupted with other packets or information intended for the same
   DLC. An end station must be able to re-assemble up to 2K octets and
   is suggested to support up to 8K octet re-assembly.  If at any time
   during this re-assembly process, a fragment is corrupted or a
   fragment is missing, the entire message is dropped.  The upper layer
   protocol is responsible for any retransmission in this case.

   This fragmentation algorithm is not intended to reliably handle all
   possible failure conditions.  As with IP fragmentation, there is a
   small possibility of reassembly error and delivery of an erroneous
   packet.  Inclusion of a higher layer checksum greatly reduces this
   risk.

10.  Address Resolution

   There are situations in which a Frame Relay station may wish to
   dynamically resolve a protocol address.  Address resolution may be
   accomplished using the standard Address Resolution Protocol (ARP) [6]
   encapsulated within a SNAP encoded Frame Relay packet as follows:

         +-----------------------+-----------------------+
         | Q.922 Address                                 |
         +-----------------------+-----------------------+
         | Control (UI)  0x03    |     pad(s)  0x00      |
         +-----------------------+-----------------------+
         |  NLPID = 0x80         |                       |  SNAP Header
         +-----------------------+  OUI = 0x00-00-00     +  Indicating
         |                                               |  ARP
         +-----------------------+-----------------------+
         |  PID = 0x0806                                 |
         +-----------------------+-----------------------+
         |                   ARP packet                  |
         |                       .                       |
         |                       .                       |
         |                       .                       |
         +-----------------------+-----------------------+















Bradley, Brown, Malis                                          [Page 17]

RFC 1294             Multiprotocol over Frame Relay         January 1992


   Where the ARP packet has the following format and values:

      Data:
        ar$hrd   16 bits     Hardware type
        ar$pro   16 bits     Protocol type
        ar$hln    8 bits     Octet length of hardware address (n)
        ar$pln    8 bits     Octet length of protocol address (m)
        ar$op    16 bits     Operation code (request or reply)
        ar$sha   noctets     source hardware address
        ar$spa   moctets     source protocol address
        ar$tha   noctets     target hardware address
        ar$tpa   moctets     target protocol address

        ar$hrd - assigned to Frame Relay is 15 decimal
                  (0x000F) [7].

        ar$pro - see assigned numbers for protocol ID number for
                 the protocol using ARP. (IP is 0x0800).

        ar$hln - length in bytes of the address field (2, 3, or 4)

        ar$pln - protocol address length is dependent on the
                 protocol (ar$pro) (for IP ar$pln is 4).

        ar$op -  1 for request and 2 for reply.

        ar$sha - Q.922 source hardware address, with C/R, FECN,
                 BECN, and DE set to zero.

        ar$tha - Q.922 target hardware address, with C/R, FECN,
                 BECN, and DE set to zero.

   Because DLCIs within most Frame Relay networks have only local
   significance, an end station will not have a specific DLCI assigned
   to itself.  Therefore, such a station does not have an address to put
   into the ARP request or reply.  Fortunately, the Frame Relay network
   does provide a method for obtaining the correct DLCIs. The solution
   proposed for the locally addressed Frame Relay network below will
   work equally well for a network where DLCIs have global significance.

   The DLCI carried within the Frame Relay header is modified as it
   traverses the network.  When the packet arrives at its destination,
   the DLCI has been set to the value that, from the standpoint of the
   receiving station, corresponds to the sending station.  For example,
   in figure 1 below, if station A were to send a message to station B,
   it would place DLCI 50 in the Frame Relay header.  When station B
   received this message, however, the DLCI would have been modified by
   the network and would appear to B as DLCI 70.



Bradley, Brown, Malis                                          [Page 18]

RFC 1294             Multiprotocol over Frame Relay         January 1992


                         ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
                        (                )
      +-----+          (                  )             +-----+
      |     |-50------(--------------------)---------70-|     |
      |  A  |        (                      )           |  B  |
      |     |-60-----(---------+            )           |     |
      +-----+         (        |           )            +-----+
                       (       |          )
                        (      |         )  <---Frame Relay
                         ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~         network
                               80
                               |
                            +-----+
                            |     |
                            |  C  |
                            |     |
                            +-----+
                                  Figure 1

      Lines between stations represent data link connections (DLCs).
      The numbers indicate the local DLCI associated with each
      connection.

         DLCI to Q.922 Address Table for Figure 1

         DLCI (decimal)  Q.922 address (hex)
              50              0x0C21
              60              0x0CC1
              70              0x1061
              80              0x1401

      If you know about frame relay, you should understand the
      corrolation between DLCI and Q.922 address.  For the uninitiated,
      the translation between DLCI and Q.922 address is based on a two
      byte address length using the Q.922 encoding format.  The format
      is:

           8   7   6   5   4   3    2   1
         +------------------------+---+--+
         |  DLCI (high order)     |c/r|ea|
         +------------------------+---+--+
         | DLCI (lower) |FECN|BECN|DE |EA|
         +--------------+----+----+---+--+

      For ARP and its variants, the FECN, BECN, C/R and DE bits are
      assumed to be 0.

   When an ARP message reaches a destination, all hardware addresses



Bradley, Brown, Malis                                          [Page 19]

RFC 1294             Multiprotocol over Frame Relay         January 1992


   will be invalid.  The address found in the frame header will,
   however, be correct. Though it does violate the purity of layering,
   Frame Relay may use the address in the header as the sender hardware
   address.  It should also be noted that the target hardware address,
   in both ARP request and reply, will also be invalid.  This should not
   cause problems since ARP does not rely on these fields and in fact,
   an implementation may zero fill or ignore the target hardware address
   field entirely.

   As an example of how this address replacement scheme may work, refer
   to figure 1.  If station A (protocol address pA) wished to resolve
   the address of station B (protocol address pB), it would format an
   ARP request with the following values:

         ARP request from A
           ar$op     1 (request)
           ar$sha    unknown
           ar$spa    pA
           ar$tha    undefined
           ar$tpa    pB

   Because station A will not have a source address associated with it,
   the source hardware address field is not valid.  Therefore, when the
   ARP packet is received, it must extract the correct address from the
   Frame Relay header and place it in the source hardware address field.
   This way, the ARP request from A will become:

         ARP request from A as modified by B
           ar$op     1 (request)
           ar$sha    0x1061 (DLCI 70) from Frame Relay header
           ar$spa    pA
           ar$tha    undefined
           ar$tpa    pB

   Station B's ARP will then be able to store station A's protocol
   address and Q.922 address association correctly.  Next, station B
   will form a reply message.  Many implementations simply place the
   source addresses from the ARP request into the target addresses and
   then fills in the source addresses with its addresses.  In this case,
   the ARP response would be:

         ARP response from B
           ar$op     2 (response)
           ar$sha    unknown
           ar$spa    pB
           ar$tha    0x1061 (DLCI 70)
           ar$tpa    pA




Bradley, Brown, Malis                                          [Page 20]

RFC 1294             Multiprotocol over Frame Relay         January 1992


   Again, the source hardware address is unknown and when the request is
   received, station A will extract the address from the Frame Relay
   header and place it in the source hardware address field.  Therefore,
   the response will become:

         ARP response from B as modified by A
           ar$op     2 (response)
           ar$sha    0x0C21 (DLCI 50)
           ar$spa    pB
           ar$tha    0x1061 (DLCI 70)
           ar$tpa    pA

   Station A will now correctly recognize station B having protocol
   address pB associated with Q.922 address 0x0C21 (DLCI 50).

   Reverse ARP (RARP) [8] will work in exactly the same way.  Still
   using figure 1, if we assume station C is an address server, the
   following RARP exchanges will occur:

         RARP request from A             RARP request as modified by C
            ar$op  3 (RARP request)         ar$op  3  (RARP request)
            ar$sha unknown                  ar$sha 0x1401 (DLCI 80)
            ar$spa undefined                ar$spa undefined
            ar$tha 0x0CC1 (DLCI 60)         ar$tha 0x0CC1 (DLCI 60)
            ar$tpa pC                       ar$tpa pC

   Station C will then look up the protocol address corresponding to
   Q.922 address 0x1401 (DLCI 80) and send the RARP response.

         RARP response from C            RARP response as modified by A
            ar$op  4  (RARP response)       ar$op  4 (RARP response)
            ar$sha unknown                  ar$sha 0x0CC1 (DLCI 60)
            ar$spa pC                       ar$spa pC
            ar$tha 0x1401 (DLCI 80)         ar$tha 0x1401 (DLCI 80)
            ar$tpa pA                       ar$tpa pA

   This means that the Frame Relay interface must only intervene in the
   processing of incoming packets.

   In the absence of suitable multicast, ARP may still be implemented.
   To do this, the end station simply sends a copy of the ARP request
   through each relevant DLC, thereby simulating a broadcast.

   The use of multicast addresses in a Frame Relay environment is
   presently under study by Frame Relay providers.  At such time that
   the issues surrounding multicasting are resolved, multicast
   addressing may become useful in sending ARP requests and other
   "broadcast" messages.



Bradley, Brown, Malis                                          [Page 21]

RFC 1294             Multiprotocol over Frame Relay         January 1992


   Because of the inefficiencies of broadcasting in a Frame Relay
   environment, a new address resolution variation was developed.  It is
   called Inverse ARP [11] and describes a method for resolving a
   protocol address when the hardware address is already known.  In
   Frame Relay's case, the known hardware address is the DLCI.  Using
   Inverse ARP for Frame Relay follows the same pattern as ARP and RARP
   use.  That is the source hardware address is inserted at the
   receiving station.

   In our example, station A may use Inverse ARP to discover the
   protocol address of the station associated with its DLCI 50.  The
   Inverse ARP request would be as follows:

         InARP Request from A (DLCI 50)
         ar$op   8       (InARP request)
         ar$sha  unknown
         ar$spa  pA
         ar$tha  0x0C21  (DLCI 50)
         ar$tpa  unknown

   When Station B receives this packet, it will modify the source
   hardware address with the Q.922 address from the Frame Relay header.
   This way, the InARP request from A will become:

         ar$op   8       (InARP request)
         ar$sha  0x1061
         ar$spa  pA
         ar$tha  0x0C21
         ar$tpa  unknown.

   Station B will format an Inverse ARP response and send it to station
   A as it would for any ARP message.

11.  IP over Frame Relay

   Internet Protocol [9] (IP) datagrams sent over a Frame Relay network
   conform to the encapsulation described previously.  Within this
   context, IP could be encapsulated in two different ways.













Bradley, Brown, Malis                                          [Page 22]

RFC 1294             Multiprotocol over Frame Relay         January 1992


         1.  NLPID value indicating IP

         +-----------------------+-----------------------+
         | Q.922 Address                                 |
         +-----------------------+-----------------------+
         | Control (UI)  0x03    | NLPID = 0xCC          |
         +-----------------------+-----------------------+
         | IP Packet             .                       |
         |                       .                       |
         |                       .                       |
         +-----------------------+-----------------------+

         2.  NLPID value indicating SNAP

         +-----------------------+-----------------------+
         | Q.922 Address                                 |
         +-----------------------+-----------------------+
         | Control (UI)  0x03    |     pad(s)  0x00      |
         +-----------------------+-----------------------+
         |  NLPID = 0x80         |                       |  SNAP Header
         +-----------------------+  OUI = 0x00-00-00     +  Indicating
         |                                               |  IP
         +-----------------------+-----------------------+
         |  PID = 0x0800                                 |
         +-----------------------+-----------------------+
         |                   IP packet                   |
         |                       .                       |
         |                       .                       |
         |                       .                       |
         +-----------------------+-----------------------+

   Although both of these encapsulations are supported under the given
   definitions, it is advantageous to select only one method as the
   appropriate mechanism for encapsulating IP data.  Therefore, IP data
   shall be encapsulated using the NLPID value of 0xCC indicating IP as
   shown in option 1 above.  This (option 1) is more efficient in
   transmission (48 fewer bits), and is consistent with the
   encapsulation of IP in X.25.

12.  Other Protocols over Frame Relay

   As with IP encapsulation, there are alternate ways to transmit
   various protocols within the scope of this definition.  To eliminate
   the conflicts, the SNAP encapsulation is only used if no NLPID value
   is defined for the given protocol.

   As an example of how this works, ISO CLNP has a NLPID defined (0x81).
   Therefore, the NLPID field will indicate ISO CLNP and the data packet



Bradley, Brown, Malis                                          [Page 23]

RFC 1294             Multiprotocol over Frame Relay         January 1992


   will follow immediately.  The frame would be as follows:

         +----------------------+----------------------+
         |               Q.922 Address                 |
         +----------------------+----------------------+
         | Control     (0x03)   | NLPID  - 0x81 (CLNP) |
         +---------------------------------------------+
         | CLNP packet                                 |
         |                   .                         |
         |                   .                         |
         +---------------------------------------------+

13.  Bridging in a Frame Relay network

   A Frame Relay interface acting as a bridge must be able to flood,
   forward, and filter packets.

   Flooding is performed by sending the packet to all possible
   destinations.  In the Frame Relay environment this means sending the
   packet through each relevant DLC.

   To forward a packet, a bridge must be able to associate a destination
   MAC address with a DLC.  It is unreasonable and perhaps impossible to
   require bridges to statically configure an association of every
   possible destination MAC address with a DLC.  Therefore, Frame Relay
   bridges must provide enough information to allow a Frame Relay
   interface to dynamically learn about foreign destinations beyond the
   set of Frame Relay stations.

   To accomplish dynamic learning, a bridged packet shall conform to the
   encapsulation described within section 7.  In this way, the receiving
   Frame Relay interface will know to look into the bridged packet and
   learn the association between foreign destination and Frame Relay
   station.

14. For Future Study

   It may be desirable for the two ends of a connection to have the
   capability to negotiate end-to-end configuration and service
   parameters.  The actual protocol and parameters to be negotiated will
   be a topic of future RFCs.

15.  Backward Compatibility

   This section is included in this RFC for completeness only.  It is
   not intended to suggest additional requirements.

   Some existing Frame Relay stations use the NLPID value of 0xCE to



Bradley, Brown, Malis                                          [Page 24]

RFC 1294             Multiprotocol over Frame Relay         January 1992


   indicate an escape to Ethernet Packet Types as defined in the latest
   version of the Assigned Numbers (RFC-1060) [7].  In this case, the
   frame will have the following format:

         +-----------------------------+
         | Q.922 Address               |
         +--                         --+
         |                             |
         +-----------------------------+
         | Control (UI = 0x03)         |
         +-----------------------------+
         | Optional Pad(s)   (0x00)    |
         +-----------------------------+
         | NLPID    (0xCE)             |
         +-----------------------------+
         | Ethertype                   |
         +-                           -+
         |                             |
         +-----------------------------+
         |             .               |
         |             .               |
         |           Data              |
         |             .               |
         |             .               |
         +-----------------------------+
         |    Frame Check Sequence     |
         +--           .             --+
         |       (two octets)          |
         +-----------------------------+

   The Ethertype field is a 16-bit value used to identify a protocol
   type for the following PDU.

   In order to be fully interoperable with stations that use this
   encoding, Frame Relay stations may recognize the NLPID value of 0xCE
   and interpret the following two byte Ethertype.  It is never
   necessary to generate this encapsulation format only to properly
   interpret it's meaning.

   For example, IP encapsulated with this NLPID value will have the
   following format:










Bradley, Brown, Malis                                          [Page 25]

RFC 1294             Multiprotocol over Frame Relay         January 1992


         +-----------------------+-----------------------+
         |Q.922 Address                                  |
         +-----------------------+-----------------------+
         |Control (UI)  0x03     | NLPID    0xCE         |
         +-----------------------+-----------------------+
         |Ethertype [7]                         0x0800   |
         +-----------------------+-----------------------+
         |  IP Packet                                    |
         |                       .                       |
         |                       .                       |
         +-----------------------+-----------------------+

16.  Appendix

   List of Known NLPIDs

      0x00    Null Network Layer or Inactive Set
              (not used with Frame Relay)
      0x80    SNAP
      0x81    ISO CLNP
      0x82    ISO ESIS
      0x83    ISO ISIS
      0xCC    Internet IP
      0xCE    EtherType - unofficial temporary use

   List of PIDs of OUI 00-80-C2

      with preserved FCS   w/o preserved FCS    Media
      ------------------   -----------------    --------------
      0x00-01              0x00-07              802.3/Ethernet
      0x00-02              0x00-08              802.4
      0x00-03              0x00-09              802.5
      0x00-04              0x00-0A              FDDI
      0x00-05              0x00-0B              802.6
      0x00-0D                                   Fragments
      0x00-0E                                   BPDUs

17.  References

   [1]  International Telegraph and Telephone Consultative Committee,
        "ISDN Data Link Layer Specification for Frame Mode Bearer
        Services", CCITT Recommendation Q.922,  19 April 1991 .

   [2]  American National Standard For Telecommunications - Integrated
        Services Digital Network - Core Aspects of Frame Protocol for
        Use with Frame Relay Bearer Service, ANSI T1.618-1991, 18 June
        1991.




Bradley, Brown, Malis                                          [Page 26]

RFC 1294             Multiprotocol over Frame Relay         January 1992


   [3]  Information technology - Telecommunications and Information
        Exchange between systems - Protocol Identification in the
        Network Layer, ISO/IEC  TR 9577: 1990 (E)  1990-10-15.

   [4]  Baker, Fred, "Point to Point Protocol Extensions for Bridging",
        Point to Point Working Group, RFC-1220, April 1991.

   [5]  International Standard, Information Processing Systems - Local
        Area Networks - Logical Link Control, ISO 8802-2: 1989 (E), IEEE
        Std 802.2-1989, 1989-12-31.

   [6]  Plummer, David C., An Ethernet Address Resolution Protocol",
        RFC-826, November 1982.

   [7]  Reynolds, J. and Postel, J., "Assigned Numbers", RFC-1060, ISI,
        March 1990.

   [8]  Finlayson, Mann, Mogul, Theimer, "A Reverse Address Resolution
        Protocol", RFC-903, Stanford University, June 1984.

   [9]  Postel, J. and Reynolds, J., "A Standard for the Transmission of
        IP Datagrams over IEEE 802 Networks", RFC-1042, ISI, February
        1988.

   [10] IEEE, "IEEE Standard for Local and Metropolitan Area Networks:
        Overview and architecture", IEEE Standards 802-1990.

   [11] Bradley, T., and C. Brown, "Inverse Address Resolution
        Protocol", RFC-1293, Wellfleet Communications, Inc., January
        1992.

18.  Security Considerations

        Security issues are not addressed in this memo.

19.  Authors' Addresses

           Terry Bradley
           Wellfleet Communications, Inc.
           15 Crosby Drive
           Bedford, MA  01730

           Phone:  (617) 275-2400

           Email:  tbradley@wellfleet.com






Bradley, Brown, Malis                                          [Page 27]

RFC 1294             Multiprotocol over Frame Relay         January 1992


           Caralyn Brown
           Wellfleet Communications, Inc.
           15 Crosby Drive
           Bedford, MA  01730

           Phone:  (617) 275-2400

           Email:  cbrown@wellfleet.com


           Andrew G. Malis
           BBN Communications
           150 CambridgePark Drive
           Cambridge, MA  02140

           Phone:  (617) 873-3419

           Email: malis@bbn.com

































Bradley, Brown, Malis                                          [Page 28]