1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
|
<pre>Network Working Group D.W. Dodds
Request for Comments: 669 BBN-TENEXA
NIC: 31435 December 4, 1974
<span class="h1">November, 1974, Survey of New-Protocol TELNET Servers</span>
Two months have elapsed since our last survey, and the appearance of
additional New-Protocol servers has progressed at the usual snail's
pace. The changes in this list are (with host numbers in octal):
SRI-AI (102) now has a New-Protocol server;
SDC-LAB (10) is back on the net and the list;
SDC-CC (110) is coming on the net but status is as yet unknown;
USC-ISI (126) and USC-ISIB (226) (formerly ISI-DEVTENEX) now have
New-Protocol servers;
SDAC-44 (32) has been removed -- no longer classed as a server host;
HAWAII-500 (344) is coming on the net, status presently unknown;
LONDON (52) has been added;
BBN-TENEXD is now host 162 (formerly 205).
What follows is an update of the summary and tabulation that appeared
in RFC #702.* Is there light at the end of the tunnel?
total server hosts 37 100%
no New-Prot server 19 51%
unknown status (new host) 2 6%
total New-Prot implem. 16 43%
New-Prot on socket 27,
Old on socket 1 (2) 9 24%
New-Prot on 1 and 27 (3) 6 16%
New-Prot on 1 only (3) 1 3%
Notes:
* All data in this report were gathered via a surveying program run
at various times, plus a few manual checks to fill out the data.
What is reported here is the way the various servers work as seen
by the new-Protocol User Telnet at BBNA, as of 4 Dec. 1974.
(2) These are the sites whose operation is 100% correct according to
all protocols and conventions, as I understand them.
(3) We realize that some of the servers that appear here as New-
Protocol servers on socket 1 are actually servers which attempt
to communicate with both Old- and New-Protocol User TELNETs
according to what control sequences are received.
<span class="grey">Dodds [Page 1]</span></pre>
<hr class='noprint'/><!--NewPage--><pre class='newpage'><span id="page-2" ></span>
<span class="grey"><a href="./rfc669">RFC 669</a> Survey of New-Protocol TELNET Servers December 1974</span>
Tabulation of server status for all server sites:
Host Host Socket Socket New-Prot, Options
No. Name 1 27 Implementation (if any)
<span class="h2"><a class="selflink" id="section-101" href="#section-101">101</a> UCLA-CCN </span> Old X
<span class="h2"><a class="selflink" id="section-201" href="#section-201">201</a> UCLA-CCBS </span> Old X
2 SRI-ARC Old X
<span class="h2"><a class="selflink" id="section-102" href="#section-102">102</a> SRI-AI </span> Old New I1,3,6; O3
3 UCSB-MOD75 Old X
4 UTAH-10 Old X
<span class="h2"><a class="selflink" id="section-105" href="#section-105">105</a> BBN-TENEX </span> Old New I1,3,6; O3
<span class="h2"><a class="selflink" id="section-305" href="#section-305">305</a> BBN-TENEXA </span> Old New I1,3,6; O3
<span class="h2"><a class="selflink" id="section-106" href="#section-106">106</a> MIT-DMS </span> New New I1,3; O3
<span class="h2"><a class="selflink" id="section-206" href="#section-206">206</a> MIT-AI </span> Old X
<span class="h2"><a class="selflink" id="section-306" href="#section-306">306</a> MIT-ML </span> Old X
7 RAND-RCC Old X
10 SDC-LAB Old X
<span class="h2"><a class="selflink" id="section-110" href="#section-110">110</a> SDC-CC </span> ? ?
11 HARV-10 New X I1,3; O3
12 LL-67 Old* X
<span class="h2"><a class="selflink" id="section-112" href="#section-112">112</a> LL-TX-2 </span> Old X
13 SU-AI New* New* I1,3
15 CASE-10 Old X
16 CMU-10B New New I1,3; O3
<span class="h2"><a class="selflink" id="section-116" href="#section-116">116</a> CMU-10A </span> New New I1,3; O3
17 I4-TENEX Old X
<span class="h2"><a class="selflink" id="section-217" href="#section-217">217</a> KI4B-TENEX </span> Old X
20 AMES-67 New New None
<span class="h2"><a class="selflink" id="section-126" href="#section-126">126</a> USC-ISI </span> Old New I1,3,6; O3
<span class="h2"><a class="selflink" id="section-226" href="#section-226">226</a> USC-ISIB </span> Old New I1,3,6; O3
27 USC-44 Old X
<span class="h2"><a class="selflink" id="section-327" href="#section-327">327</a> USC-ECL </span> Old X
37 CCA-TENEX Old X
40 PARC-MAXC Old New I1,3,6; O3
43 UCSD-CC Old New I0(!),3; O0,3
<span class="h2"><a class="selflink" id="section-344" href="#section-344">344</a> HAWAII-500 </span> ? ?
52 LONDON Old* X
53 OFFICE-1 Old X
54 MIT-MULTICS New New None
61 BBN-TENEXB Old New I1,3,6; O3
<span class="h2"><a class="selflink" id="section-162" href="#section-162">162</a> BBN-TENEXD </span> Old New I1,3,6; O3
<span class="grey">Dodds [Page 2]</span></pre>
<hr class='noprint'/><!--NewPage--><pre class='newpage'><span id="page-3" ></span>
<span class="grey"><a href="./rfc669">RFC 669</a> Survey of New-Protocol TELNET Servers December 1974</span>
Key: X No server at this socket
? Status not ascertained -- unable to connect to host
I# Option # implemented incoming to user (Server says "Will #")
O# Option # implemented outgoing from user (Server says "Do #")
(# is option number in new Protocol. All options implemented
by anyone are:
0 Transmit-Binary
1 Echo
3 Suppress-Go-Ahead
6 Timing-Mark )
Note: * These servers return improper responses to some TELNET option
requests.
[ This RFC was put into machine readable form for entry ]
[ into the online RFC archives by Alex McKenzie with ]
[ support from GTE, formerly BBN Corp. 2/2000 ]
Dodds [Page 3]
</pre>
|
