1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590 591 592 593 594 595 596 597 598 599 600 601 602 603 604 605 606 607 608 609 610 611 612 613 614 615 616 617 618 619 620 621 622 623 624 625 626 627 628 629 630 631 632 633 634 635 636 637 638 639 640 641 642 643 644 645 646 647 648 649 650 651 652 653 654 655 656 657 658 659 660 661 662 663 664 665 666 667 668 669 670 671 672 673 674 675 676 677 678 679 680 681 682 683 684 685 686 687 688 689 690 691 692 693 694 695 696 697 698 699 700 701 702 703 704 705 706 707 708 709 710 711 712 713 714 715 716 717 718 719 720 721 722 723 724 725 726 727 728 729 730 731 732 733 734 735 736 737 738 739 740 741 742 743 744 745 746 747 748 749 750 751 752 753 754 755 756 757 758 759 760 761 762 763 764 765 766 767 768 769 770 771 772 773 774 775 776 777 778 779 780 781 782 783 784 785 786 787 788 789 790 791 792 793 794 795 796 797 798 799 800 801 802 803 804 805 806 807 808 809 810 811 812 813 814 815 816 817 818 819 820 821 822 823 824 825 826 827 828 829 830 831 832 833 834 835 836 837 838 839 840 841 842 843 844 845 846 847 848 849 850 851 852 853 854 855 856 857 858 859 860 861 862 863 864 865 866 867 868 869 870 871 872 873 874 875 876 877 878 879 880 881 882 883 884 885 886 887 888 889 890 891 892 893 894 895 896 897 898 899 900 901 902 903 904 905 906 907 908 909 910 911 912 913 914 915 916 917 918 919 920 921 922 923 924 925 926 927 928 929 930 931 932 933 934 935 936 937 938 939 940 941 942 943 944 945 946 947 948 949 950 951 952 953 954 955 956 957 958 959 960 961 962 963 964 965 966 967 968 969 970 971 972 973 974 975 976 977 978 979 980 981 982 983 984 985 986 987 988 989 990 991 992 993 994 995 996 997 998 999 1000 1001 1002 1003 1004 1005 1006 1007 1008 1009 1010 1011 1012 1013 1014 1015 1016 1017 1018 1019 1020 1021 1022 1023 1024 1025 1026 1027 1028 1029 1030 1031 1032 1033 1034 1035 1036 1037 1038 1039 1040 1041 1042 1043 1044 1045 1046 1047 1048 1049 1050 1051 1052 1053 1054 1055 1056 1057 1058 1059 1060 1061 1062 1063 1064 1065 1066 1067 1068 1069 1070 1071 1072 1073 1074 1075 1076 1077 1078 1079 1080 1081 1082 1083 1084 1085 1086 1087 1088 1089 1090 1091 1092 1093 1094 1095 1096 1097 1098 1099 1100 1101 1102 1103 1104 1105 1106 1107 1108 1109 1110 1111 1112 1113 1114 1115 1116 1117 1118 1119 1120 1121 1122 1123 1124 1125 1126 1127 1128 1129 1130 1131 1132 1133 1134 1135 1136 1137 1138 1139 1140 1141 1142 1143 1144 1145 1146 1147 1148 1149 1150 1151 1152 1153 1154 1155 1156 1157 1158 1159 1160 1161 1162 1163 1164 1165 1166 1167 1168 1169 1170 1171 1172 1173 1174 1175 1176 1177 1178 1179 1180 1181 1182 1183 1184 1185 1186 1187 1188 1189 1190 1191 1192 1193 1194 1195 1196 1197 1198 1199 1200 1201 1202 1203 1204 1205 1206 1207 1208 1209 1210 1211 1212 1213 1214 1215 1216 1217 1218 1219 1220 1221 1222 1223 1224 1225 1226 1227 1228 1229 1230 1231 1232 1233 1234 1235 1236 1237 1238 1239 1240 1241 1242 1243 1244 1245 1246 1247 1248 1249 1250 1251 1252 1253 1254 1255 1256 1257 1258 1259 1260 1261 1262 1263 1264 1265 1266 1267 1268 1269 1270 1271 1272 1273 1274 1275 1276 1277 1278 1279 1280 1281 1282 1283 1284 1285 1286 1287 1288 1289 1290 1291 1292 1293 1294 1295 1296 1297 1298 1299 1300 1301 1302 1303 1304 1305 1306 1307 1308 1309 1310 1311 1312 1313 1314 1315 1316 1317 1318 1319 1320 1321 1322 1323 1324 1325 1326 1327 1328 1329 1330 1331 1332 1333 1334 1335 1336 1337 1338 1339 1340 1341 1342 1343 1344 1345 1346 1347 1348 1349 1350 1351 1352 1353 1354 1355 1356 1357 1358 1359 1360 1361 1362 1363 1364 1365 1366 1367 1368 1369 1370 1371 1372 1373 1374 1375 1376 1377 1378 1379 1380 1381 1382 1383 1384 1385 1386 1387 1388 1389 1390 1391 1392 1393 1394 1395 1396 1397 1398 1399 1400 1401 1402 1403 1404 1405 1406 1407 1408 1409 1410 1411 1412 1413 1414 1415 1416 1417 1418 1419 1420 1421 1422 1423 1424 1425 1426 1427 1428 1429 1430 1431 1432 1433 1434 1435 1436 1437 1438 1439 1440 1441 1442 1443 1444 1445 1446 1447 1448 1449 1450 1451 1452 1453 1454 1455 1456 1457 1458 1459 1460 1461 1462 1463 1464 1465 1466 1467 1468 1469 1470 1471 1472 1473 1474 1475 1476 1477 1478 1479 1480 1481 1482 1483 1484 1485 1486 1487 1488 1489 1490 1491 1492 1493 1494 1495 1496 1497 1498 1499 1500 1501 1502 1503 1504 1505 1506 1507 1508 1509 1510 1511 1512 1513 1514 1515 1516 1517 1518 1519 1520 1521 1522 1523 1524 1525 1526 1527 1528 1529 1530 1531 1532 1533 1534 1535 1536 1537 1538 1539 1540 1541 1542 1543 1544 1545 1546 1547 1548 1549 1550 1551 1552 1553 1554 1555 1556 1557 1558 1559 1560 1561 1562 1563 1564 1565 1566 1567 1568 1569 1570 1571 1572 1573 1574 1575 1576 1577 1578 1579 1580 1581 1582 1583 1584 1585 1586 1587 1588 1589 1590 1591 1592 1593 1594 1595 1596 1597 1598 1599 1600 1601 1602 1603 1604 1605 1606 1607 1608 1609 1610 1611 1612 1613 1614 1615 1616 1617 1618 1619 1620 1621 1622 1623 1624 1625 1626 1627 1628 1629 1630 1631 1632 1633 1634 1635 1636 1637 1638 1639 1640 1641 1642 1643 1644 1645 1646 1647 1648 1649 1650 1651 1652 1653 1654 1655 1656 1657 1658 1659 1660 1661 1662 1663 1664 1665 1666 1667 1668 1669 1670 1671 1672 1673 1674 1675 1676 1677 1678 1679 1680 1681 1682 1683 1684 1685 1686 1687 1688 1689 1690 1691 1692 1693 1694 1695 1696 1697 1698 1699 1700 1701 1702 1703 1704 1705 1706 1707 1708 1709 1710 1711 1712 1713 1714 1715 1716 1717 1718 1719 1720 1721 1722 1723 1724 1725 1726 1727 1728 1729 1730 1731 1732 1733 1734 1735 1736 1737 1738 1739 1740 1741 1742 1743 1744 1745 1746 1747 1748 1749 1750 1751 1752 1753 1754 1755 1756 1757 1758 1759 1760 1761 1762 1763 1764 1765 1766 1767 1768 1769 1770 1771 1772 1773 1774 1775 1776 1777 1778 1779 1780 1781 1782 1783 1784 1785 1786 1787 1788 1789 1790 1791 1792 1793 1794 1795 1796 1797 1798 1799 1800 1801 1802 1803 1804 1805 1806 1807 1808 1809 1810 1811 1812 1813 1814 1815 1816 1817 1818 1819 1820 1821 1822 1823 1824 1825 1826 1827 1828 1829 1830 1831 1832 1833 1834 1835 1836 1837 1838 1839 1840 1841 1842 1843 1844 1845 1846 1847 1848 1849 1850 1851 1852 1853 1854 1855 1856 1857 1858 1859 1860 1861 1862 1863 1864 1865 1866 1867 1868 1869 1870 1871 1872 1873 1874 1875 1876 1877 1878 1879 1880 1881 1882 1883 1884 1885 1886 1887 1888 1889 1890 1891 1892 1893 1894 1895 1896 1897 1898 1899 1900 1901 1902 1903 1904 1905 1906 1907 1908 1909 1910 1911 1912 1913 1914 1915 1916 1917 1918 1919 1920 1921 1922 1923 1924 1925 1926 1927 1928 1929 1930 1931 1932 1933 1934 1935 1936 1937 1938 1939 1940 1941 1942 1943 1944 1945 1946 1947 1948 1949 1950 1951 1952 1953 1954 1955 1956 1957 1958 1959 1960 1961 1962 1963 1964 1965 1966 1967 1968 1969 1970 1971 1972 1973 1974 1975 1976 1977 1978 1979 1980 1981 1982 1983 1984 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034 2035 2036 2037 2038 2039 2040 2041 2042 2043 2044 2045 2046 2047 2048 2049 2050 2051 2052 2053 2054 2055 2056 2057 2058 2059 2060 2061 2062 2063 2064 2065 2066 2067 2068 2069 2070 2071 2072 2073 2074 2075 2076 2077 2078 2079 2080 2081 2082 2083 2084 2085 2086 2087 2088 2089 2090 2091 2092 2093 2094 2095 2096 2097 2098 2099 2100 2101 2102 2103 2104 2105 2106 2107 2108 2109 2110 2111 2112 2113 2114 2115 2116 2117 2118 2119 2120 2121 2122 2123 2124 2125 2126 2127 2128 2129 2130 2131 2132 2133 2134 2135 2136 2137 2138 2139 2140 2141 2142 2143 2144 2145 2146 2147 2148 2149 2150 2151 2152 2153 2154 2155 2156 2157 2158 2159 2160 2161 2162 2163 2164 2165 2166 2167 2168 2169 2170 2171 2172 2173 2174 2175 2176 2177 2178 2179 2180 2181 2182 2183 2184 2185 2186 2187 2188 2189 2190 2191 2192 2193 2194 2195 2196 2197 2198 2199 2200 2201 2202 2203 2204 2205 2206 2207 2208 2209 2210 2211 2212 2213 2214 2215 2216 2217 2218 2219 2220 2221 2222 2223 2224 2225 2226 2227 2228 2229 2230 2231 2232 2233 2234 2235 2236 2237 2238 2239 2240 2241 2242 2243 2244 2245 2246 2247 2248 2249 2250 2251 2252 2253 2254 2255 2256 2257 2258 2259 2260 2261 2262 2263 2264 2265 2266 2267 2268 2269 2270 2271 2272
|
<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<rfc xmlns:xi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XInclude" version="3" category="std" consensus="true" docName="draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-auto-bandwidth-12" indexInclude="true" ipr="trust200902" number="8733" prepTime="2020-02-25T16:36:04" scripts="Common,Latin" sortRefs="true" submissionType="IETF" symRefs="true" tocDepth="4" tocInclude="true" xml:lang="en">
<link href="https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-auto-bandwidth-12" rel="prev"/>
<link href="https://dx.doi.org/10.17487/rfc8733" rel="alternate"/>
<link href="urn:issn:2070-1721" rel="alternate"/>
<front>
<title abbrev="Auto-Bandwidth with Stateful PCE">Path Computation Element Communication Protocol (PCEP) Extensions for MPLS-TE Label Switched Path (LSP) Auto-Bandwidth Adjustment with Stateful PCE</title>
<seriesInfo name="RFC" value="8733" stream="IETF"/>
<author fullname="Dhruv Dhody" initials="D." role="editor" surname="Dhody">
<organization showOnFrontPage="true">Huawei Technologies</organization>
<address>
<postal>
<street>Divyashree Techno Park, Whitefield</street>
<city>Bangalore</city>
<region>Karnataka</region>
<code>560066</code>
<country>India</country>
</postal>
<email>dhruv.ietf@gmail.com</email>
</address>
</author>
<author fullname="Rakesh Gandhi" initials="R." role="editor" surname="Gandhi">
<organization showOnFrontPage="true">Cisco Systems, Inc.</organization>
<address>
<postal>
<country>Canada</country>
</postal>
<email>rgandhi@cisco.com</email>
</address>
</author>
<author fullname="Udayasree Palle" initials="U." surname="Palle">
<organization showOnFrontPage="true">Individual Contributor</organization>
<address>
<email>udayasreereddy@gmail.com</email>
</address>
</author>
<author fullname="Ravi Singh" initials="R." surname="Singh">
<organization showOnFrontPage="true">Individual Contributor</organization>
<address>
<email>ravi.singh.ietf@gmail.com</email>
</address>
</author>
<author fullname="Luyuan Fang" initials="L." surname="Fang">
<organization showOnFrontPage="true">Expedia Group, Inc.</organization>
<address>
<postal>
<country>United States of America</country>
</postal>
<email>luyuanf@gmail.com</email>
</address>
</author>
<date month="02" year="2020"/>
<workgroup>PCE Working Group</workgroup>
<keyword>Bandwidth optimization</keyword>
<keyword>PCEP Overwhelm</keyword>
<keyword>LSP re-optimization</keyword>
<abstract pn="section-abstract">
<t pn="section-abstract-1">
The Path Computation Element Communication Protocol (PCEP) provides
mechanisms for Path Computation Elements (PCEs) to perform path
computations in response to Path Computation Client (PCC) requests.
Stateful PCE extensions allow stateful control of MPLS-TE Label Switched Paths (LSPs) using PCEP.</t>
<t pn="section-abstract-2">
The auto-bandwidth feature allows automatic and dynamic
adjustment of the TE LSP bandwidth reservation based on the volume of
traffic flowing through the LSP. This document describes PCEP
extensions for auto-bandwidth adjustment when employing an
active stateful PCE for both PCE-initiated and PCC-initiated LSPs.</t>
</abstract>
<boilerplate>
<section anchor="status-of-memo" numbered="false" removeInRFC="false" toc="exclude" pn="section-boilerplate.1">
<name slugifiedName="name-status-of-this-memo">Status of This Memo</name>
<t pn="section-boilerplate.1-1">
This is an Internet Standards Track document.
</t>
<t pn="section-boilerplate.1-2">
This document is a product of the Internet Engineering Task Force
(IETF). It represents the consensus of the IETF community. It has
received public review and has been approved for publication by
the Internet Engineering Steering Group (IESG). Further
information on Internet Standards is available in Section 2 of
RFC 7841.
</t>
<t pn="section-boilerplate.1-3">
Information about the current status of this document, any
errata, and how to provide feedback on it may be obtained at
<eref target="https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8733" brackets="none"/>.
</t>
</section>
<section anchor="copyright" numbered="false" removeInRFC="false" toc="exclude" pn="section-boilerplate.2">
<name slugifiedName="name-copyright-notice">Copyright Notice</name>
<t pn="section-boilerplate.2-1">
Copyright (c) 2020 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
document authors. All rights reserved.
</t>
<t pn="section-boilerplate.2-2">
This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
Provisions Relating to IETF Documents
(<eref target="https://trustee.ietf.org/license-info" brackets="none"/>) in effect on the date of
publication of this document. Please review these documents
carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with
respect to this document. Code Components extracted from this
document must include Simplified BSD License text as described in
Section 4.e of the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without
warranty as described in the Simplified BSD License.
</t>
</section>
</boilerplate>
<toc>
<section anchor="toc" numbered="false" removeInRFC="false" toc="exclude" pn="section-toc.1">
<name slugifiedName="name-table-of-contents">Table of Contents</name>
<ul bare="true" empty="true" indent="2" spacing="compact" pn="section-toc.1-1">
<li pn="section-toc.1-1.1">
<t keepWithNext="true" pn="section-toc.1-1.1.1"><xref derivedContent="1" format="counter" sectionFormat="of" target="section-1"/>. <xref derivedContent="" format="title" sectionFormat="of" target="name-introduction">Introduction</xref></t>
</li>
<li pn="section-toc.1-1.2">
<t keepWithNext="true" pn="section-toc.1-1.2.1"><xref derivedContent="2" format="counter" sectionFormat="of" target="section-2"/>. <xref derivedContent="" format="title" sectionFormat="of" target="name-conventions-used-in-this-do">Conventions Used in This Document</xref></t>
<ul bare="true" empty="true" indent="2" spacing="compact" pn="section-toc.1-1.2.2">
<li pn="section-toc.1-1.2.2.1">
<t keepWithNext="true" pn="section-toc.1-1.2.2.1.1"><xref derivedContent="2.1" format="counter" sectionFormat="of" target="section-2.1"/>. <xref derivedContent="" format="title" sectionFormat="of" target="name-requirements-language">Requirements Language</xref></t>
</li>
<li pn="section-toc.1-1.2.2.2">
<t keepWithNext="true" pn="section-toc.1-1.2.2.2.1"><xref derivedContent="2.2" format="counter" sectionFormat="of" target="section-2.2"/>. <xref derivedContent="" format="title" sectionFormat="of" target="name-abbreviations">Abbreviations</xref></t>
</li>
<li pn="section-toc.1-1.2.2.3">
<t keepWithNext="true" pn="section-toc.1-1.2.2.3.1"><xref derivedContent="2.3" format="counter" sectionFormat="of" target="section-2.3"/>. <xref derivedContent="" format="title" sectionFormat="of" target="name-terminology">Terminology</xref></t>
</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li pn="section-toc.1-1.3">
<t keepWithNext="true" pn="section-toc.1-1.3.1"><xref derivedContent="3" format="counter" sectionFormat="of" target="section-3"/>. <xref derivedContent="" format="title" sectionFormat="of" target="name-requirements-for-pcep-exten">Requirements for PCEP Extensions</xref></t>
</li>
<li pn="section-toc.1-1.4">
<t keepWithNext="true" pn="section-toc.1-1.4.1"><xref derivedContent="4" format="counter" sectionFormat="of" target="section-4"/>. <xref derivedContent="" format="title" sectionFormat="of" target="name-architectural-overview">Architectural Overview</xref></t>
<ul bare="true" empty="true" indent="2" spacing="compact" pn="section-toc.1-1.4.2">
<li pn="section-toc.1-1.4.2.1">
<t keepWithNext="true" pn="section-toc.1-1.4.2.1.1"><xref derivedContent="4.1" format="counter" sectionFormat="of" target="section-4.1"/>. <xref derivedContent="" format="title" sectionFormat="of" target="name-auto-bandwidth-overview">Auto-Bandwidth Overview</xref></t>
</li>
<li pn="section-toc.1-1.4.2.2">
<t keepWithNext="true" pn="section-toc.1-1.4.2.2.1"><xref derivedContent="4.2" format="counter" sectionFormat="of" target="section-4.2"/>. <xref derivedContent="" format="title" sectionFormat="of" target="name-auto-bandwidth-theory-of-op">Auto-Bandwidth Theory of Operation</xref></t>
</li>
<li pn="section-toc.1-1.4.2.3">
<t keepWithNext="true" pn="section-toc.1-1.4.2.3.1"><xref derivedContent="4.3" format="counter" sectionFormat="of" target="section-4.3"/>. <xref derivedContent="" format="title" sectionFormat="of" target="name-scaling-considerations">Scaling Considerations</xref></t>
</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li pn="section-toc.1-1.5">
<t keepWithNext="true" pn="section-toc.1-1.5.1"><xref derivedContent="5" format="counter" sectionFormat="of" target="section-5"/>. <xref derivedContent="" format="title" sectionFormat="of" target="name-pcep-extensions">PCEP Extensions</xref></t>
<ul bare="true" empty="true" indent="2" spacing="compact" pn="section-toc.1-1.5.2">
<li pn="section-toc.1-1.5.2.1">
<t keepWithNext="true" pn="section-toc.1-1.5.2.1.1"><xref derivedContent="5.1" format="counter" sectionFormat="of" target="section-5.1"/>. <xref derivedContent="" format="title" sectionFormat="of" target="name-capability-advertisement">Capability Advertisement</xref></t>
<ul bare="true" empty="true" indent="2" spacing="compact" pn="section-toc.1-1.5.2.1.2">
<li pn="section-toc.1-1.5.2.1.2.1">
<t keepWithNext="true" pn="section-toc.1-1.5.2.1.2.1.1"><xref derivedContent="5.1.1" format="counter" sectionFormat="of" target="section-5.1.1"/>. <xref derivedContent="" format="title" sectionFormat="of" target="name-auto-bandwidth-capability-t">AUTO-BANDWIDTH-CAPABILITY TLV</xref></t>
</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li pn="section-toc.1-1.5.2.2">
<t keepWithNext="true" pn="section-toc.1-1.5.2.2.1"><xref derivedContent="5.2" format="counter" sectionFormat="of" target="section-5.2"/>. <xref derivedContent="" format="title" sectionFormat="of" target="name-auto-bandwidth-attributes-t">AUTO-BANDWIDTH-ATTRIBUTES TLV</xref></t>
<ul bare="true" empty="true" indent="2" spacing="compact" pn="section-toc.1-1.5.2.2.2">
<li pn="section-toc.1-1.5.2.2.2.1">
<t keepWithNext="true" pn="section-toc.1-1.5.2.2.2.1.1"><xref derivedContent="5.2.1" format="counter" sectionFormat="of" target="section-5.2.1"/>. <xref derivedContent="" format="title" sectionFormat="of" target="name-sample-interval-sub-tlv">Sample-Interval Sub-TLV</xref></t>
</li>
<li pn="section-toc.1-1.5.2.2.2.2">
<t keepWithNext="true" pn="section-toc.1-1.5.2.2.2.2.1"><xref derivedContent="5.2.2" format="counter" sectionFormat="of" target="section-5.2.2"/>. <xref derivedContent="" format="title" sectionFormat="of" target="name-adjustment-intervals">Adjustment-Intervals</xref></t>
<ul bare="true" empty="true" indent="2" spacing="compact" pn="section-toc.1-1.5.2.2.2.2.2">
<li pn="section-toc.1-1.5.2.2.2.2.2.1">
<t keepWithNext="true" pn="section-toc.1-1.5.2.2.2.2.2.1.1"><xref derivedContent="5.2.2.1" format="counter" sectionFormat="of" target="section-5.2.2.1"/>. <xref derivedContent="" format="title" sectionFormat="of" target="name-adjustment-interval-sub-tlv">Adjustment-Interval Sub-TLV</xref></t>
</li>
<li pn="section-toc.1-1.5.2.2.2.2.2.2">
<t keepWithNext="true" pn="section-toc.1-1.5.2.2.2.2.2.2.1"><xref derivedContent="5.2.2.2" format="counter" sectionFormat="of" target="section-5.2.2.2"/>. <xref derivedContent="" format="title" sectionFormat="of" target="name-down-adjustment-interval-su">Down-Adjustment-Interval Sub-TLV</xref></t>
</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li pn="section-toc.1-1.5.2.2.2.3">
<t keepWithNext="true" pn="section-toc.1-1.5.2.2.2.3.1"><xref derivedContent="5.2.3" format="counter" sectionFormat="of" target="section-5.2.3"/>. <xref derivedContent="" format="title" sectionFormat="of" target="name-adjustment-thresholds">Adjustment-Thresholds</xref></t>
<ul bare="true" empty="true" indent="2" spacing="compact" pn="section-toc.1-1.5.2.2.2.3.2">
<li pn="section-toc.1-1.5.2.2.2.3.2.1">
<t keepWithNext="true" pn="section-toc.1-1.5.2.2.2.3.2.1.1"><xref derivedContent="5.2.3.1" format="counter" sectionFormat="of" target="section-5.2.3.1"/>. <xref derivedContent="" format="title" sectionFormat="of" target="name-adjustment-threshold-sub-tl">Adjustment-Threshold Sub-TLV</xref></t>
</li>
<li pn="section-toc.1-1.5.2.2.2.3.2.2">
<t keepWithNext="true" pn="section-toc.1-1.5.2.2.2.3.2.2.1"><xref derivedContent="5.2.3.2" format="counter" sectionFormat="of" target="section-5.2.3.2"/>. <xref derivedContent="" format="title" sectionFormat="of" target="name-adjustment-threshold-percen">Adjustment-Threshold-Percentage Sub-TLV</xref></t>
</li>
<li pn="section-toc.1-1.5.2.2.2.3.2.3">
<t keepWithNext="true" pn="section-toc.1-1.5.2.2.2.3.2.3.1"><xref derivedContent="5.2.3.3" format="counter" sectionFormat="of" target="section-5.2.3.3"/>. <xref derivedContent="" format="title" sectionFormat="of" target="name-down-adjustment-threshold-s">Down-Adjustment-Threshold Sub-TLV</xref></t>
</li>
<li pn="section-toc.1-1.5.2.2.2.3.2.4">
<t keepWithNext="true" pn="section-toc.1-1.5.2.2.2.3.2.4.1"><xref derivedContent="5.2.3.4" format="counter" sectionFormat="of" target="section-5.2.3.4"/>. <xref derivedContent="" format="title" sectionFormat="of" target="name-down-adjustment-threshold-p">Down-Adjustment-Threshold-Percentage Sub-TLV</xref></t>
</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li pn="section-toc.1-1.5.2.2.2.4">
<t keepWithNext="true" pn="section-toc.1-1.5.2.2.2.4.1"><xref derivedContent="5.2.4" format="counter" sectionFormat="of" target="section-5.2.4"/>. <xref derivedContent="" format="title" sectionFormat="of" target="name-minimum-and-maximum-bandwid">Minimum and Maximum-Bandwidth Values</xref></t>
<ul bare="true" empty="true" indent="2" spacing="compact" pn="section-toc.1-1.5.2.2.2.4.2">
<li pn="section-toc.1-1.5.2.2.2.4.2.1">
<t keepWithNext="true" pn="section-toc.1-1.5.2.2.2.4.2.1.1"><xref derivedContent="5.2.4.1" format="counter" sectionFormat="of" target="section-5.2.4.1"/>. <xref derivedContent="" format="title" sectionFormat="of" target="name-minimum-bandwidth-sub-tlv">Minimum-Bandwidth Sub-TLV</xref></t>
</li>
<li pn="section-toc.1-1.5.2.2.2.4.2.2">
<t keepWithNext="true" pn="section-toc.1-1.5.2.2.2.4.2.2.1"><xref derivedContent="5.2.4.2" format="counter" sectionFormat="of" target="section-5.2.4.2"/>. <xref derivedContent="" format="title" sectionFormat="of" target="name-maximum-bandwidth-sub-tlv">Maximum-Bandwidth Sub-TLV</xref></t>
</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li pn="section-toc.1-1.5.2.2.2.5">
<t keepWithNext="true" pn="section-toc.1-1.5.2.2.2.5.1"><xref derivedContent="5.2.5" format="counter" sectionFormat="of" target="section-5.2.5"/>. <xref derivedContent="" format="title" sectionFormat="of" target="name-overflow-and-underflow-cond">Overflow and Underflow Conditions</xref></t>
<ul bare="true" empty="true" indent="2" spacing="compact" pn="section-toc.1-1.5.2.2.2.5.2">
<li pn="section-toc.1-1.5.2.2.2.5.2.1">
<t keepWithNext="true" pn="section-toc.1-1.5.2.2.2.5.2.1.1"><xref derivedContent="5.2.5.1" format="counter" sectionFormat="of" target="section-5.2.5.1"/>. <xref derivedContent="" format="title" sectionFormat="of" target="name-overflow-threshold-sub-tlv">Overflow-Threshold Sub-TLV</xref></t>
</li>
<li pn="section-toc.1-1.5.2.2.2.5.2.2">
<t keepWithNext="true" pn="section-toc.1-1.5.2.2.2.5.2.2.1"><xref derivedContent="5.2.5.2" format="counter" sectionFormat="of" target="section-5.2.5.2"/>. <xref derivedContent="" format="title" sectionFormat="of" target="name-overflow-threshold-percenta">Overflow-Threshold-Percentage Sub-TLV</xref></t>
</li>
<li pn="section-toc.1-1.5.2.2.2.5.2.3">
<t keepWithNext="true" pn="section-toc.1-1.5.2.2.2.5.2.3.1"><xref derivedContent="5.2.5.3" format="counter" sectionFormat="of" target="section-5.2.5.3"/>. <xref derivedContent="" format="title" sectionFormat="of" target="name-underflow-threshold-sub-tlv">Underflow-Threshold Sub-TLV</xref></t>
</li>
<li pn="section-toc.1-1.5.2.2.2.5.2.4">
<t keepWithNext="true" pn="section-toc.1-1.5.2.2.2.5.2.4.1"><xref derivedContent="5.2.5.4" format="counter" sectionFormat="of" target="section-5.2.5.4"/>. <xref derivedContent="" format="title" sectionFormat="of" target="name-underflow-threshold-percent">Underflow-Threshold-Percentage Sub-TLV</xref></t>
</li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li pn="section-toc.1-1.5.2.3">
<t keepWithNext="true" pn="section-toc.1-1.5.2.3.1"><xref derivedContent="5.3" format="counter" sectionFormat="of" target="section-5.3"/>. <xref derivedContent="" format="title" sectionFormat="of" target="name-bandwidth-object">BANDWIDTH Object</xref></t>
</li>
<li pn="section-toc.1-1.5.2.4">
<t keepWithNext="true" pn="section-toc.1-1.5.2.4.1"><xref derivedContent="5.4" format="counter" sectionFormat="of" target="section-5.4"/>. <xref derivedContent="" format="title" sectionFormat="of" target="name-the-pcinitiate-message">The PCInitiate Message</xref></t>
</li>
<li pn="section-toc.1-1.5.2.5">
<t keepWithNext="true" pn="section-toc.1-1.5.2.5.1"><xref derivedContent="5.5" format="counter" sectionFormat="of" target="section-5.5"/>. <xref derivedContent="" format="title" sectionFormat="of" target="name-the-pcupd-message">The PCUpd Message</xref></t>
</li>
<li pn="section-toc.1-1.5.2.6">
<t keepWithNext="true" pn="section-toc.1-1.5.2.6.1"><xref derivedContent="5.6" format="counter" sectionFormat="of" target="section-5.6"/>. <xref derivedContent="" format="title" sectionFormat="of" target="name-the-pcrpt-message">The PCRpt Message</xref></t>
</li>
<li pn="section-toc.1-1.5.2.7">
<t keepWithNext="true" pn="section-toc.1-1.5.2.7.1"><xref derivedContent="5.7" format="counter" sectionFormat="of" target="section-5.7"/>. <xref derivedContent="" format="title" sectionFormat="of" target="name-the-pcntf-message">The PCNtf Message</xref></t>
</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li pn="section-toc.1-1.6">
<t keepWithNext="true" pn="section-toc.1-1.6.1"><xref derivedContent="6" format="counter" sectionFormat="of" target="section-6"/>. <xref derivedContent="" format="title" sectionFormat="of" target="name-manageability-consideration">Manageability Considerations</xref></t>
<ul bare="true" empty="true" indent="2" spacing="compact" pn="section-toc.1-1.6.2">
<li pn="section-toc.1-1.6.2.1">
<t keepWithNext="true" pn="section-toc.1-1.6.2.1.1"><xref derivedContent="6.1" format="counter" sectionFormat="of" target="section-6.1"/>. <xref derivedContent="" format="title" sectionFormat="of" target="name-control-of-function-and-pol">Control of Function and Policy</xref></t>
</li>
<li pn="section-toc.1-1.6.2.2">
<t keepWithNext="true" pn="section-toc.1-1.6.2.2.1"><xref derivedContent="6.2" format="counter" sectionFormat="of" target="section-6.2"/>. <xref derivedContent="" format="title" sectionFormat="of" target="name-information-and-data-models">Information and Data Models</xref></t>
</li>
<li pn="section-toc.1-1.6.2.3">
<t keepWithNext="true" pn="section-toc.1-1.6.2.3.1"><xref derivedContent="6.3" format="counter" sectionFormat="of" target="section-6.3"/>. <xref derivedContent="" format="title" sectionFormat="of" target="name-liveness-detection-and-moni">Liveness Detection and Monitoring</xref></t>
</li>
<li pn="section-toc.1-1.6.2.4">
<t keepWithNext="true" pn="section-toc.1-1.6.2.4.1"><xref derivedContent="6.4" format="counter" sectionFormat="of" target="section-6.4"/>. <xref derivedContent="" format="title" sectionFormat="of" target="name-verifying-correct-operation">Verifying Correct Operations</xref></t>
</li>
<li pn="section-toc.1-1.6.2.5">
<t keepWithNext="true" pn="section-toc.1-1.6.2.5.1"><xref derivedContent="6.5" format="counter" sectionFormat="of" target="section-6.5"/>. <xref derivedContent="" format="title" sectionFormat="of" target="name-requirements-for-other-prot">Requirements for Other Protocols</xref></t>
</li>
<li pn="section-toc.1-1.6.2.6">
<t keepWithNext="true" pn="section-toc.1-1.6.2.6.1"><xref derivedContent="6.6" format="counter" sectionFormat="of" target="section-6.6"/>. <xref derivedContent="" format="title" sectionFormat="of" target="name-impact-on-network-operation">Impact on Network Operations</xref></t>
</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li pn="section-toc.1-1.7">
<t keepWithNext="true" pn="section-toc.1-1.7.1"><xref derivedContent="7" format="counter" sectionFormat="of" target="section-7"/>. <xref derivedContent="" format="title" sectionFormat="of" target="name-security-considerations">Security Considerations</xref></t>
</li>
<li pn="section-toc.1-1.8">
<t keepWithNext="true" pn="section-toc.1-1.8.1"><xref derivedContent="8" format="counter" sectionFormat="of" target="section-8"/>. <xref derivedContent="" format="title" sectionFormat="of" target="name-iana-considerations">IANA Considerations</xref></t>
<ul bare="true" empty="true" indent="2" spacing="compact" pn="section-toc.1-1.8.2">
<li pn="section-toc.1-1.8.2.1">
<t keepWithNext="true" pn="section-toc.1-1.8.2.1.1"><xref derivedContent="8.1" format="counter" sectionFormat="of" target="section-8.1"/>. <xref derivedContent="" format="title" sectionFormat="of" target="name-pcep-tlv-type-indicators">PCEP TLV Type Indicators</xref></t>
</li>
<li pn="section-toc.1-1.8.2.2">
<t keepWithNext="true" pn="section-toc.1-1.8.2.2.1"><xref derivedContent="8.2" format="counter" sectionFormat="of" target="section-8.2"/>. <xref derivedContent="" format="title" sectionFormat="of" target="name-auto-bandwidth-capability-tlv">AUTO-BANDWIDTH-CAPABILITY TLV Flag Field</xref></t>
</li>
<li pn="section-toc.1-1.8.2.3">
<t keepWithNext="true" pn="section-toc.1-1.8.2.3.1"><xref derivedContent="8.3" format="counter" sectionFormat="of" target="section-8.3"/>. <xref derivedContent="" format="title" sectionFormat="of" target="name-auto-bandwidth-attributes-s">AUTO-BANDWIDTH-ATTRIBUTES Sub-TLV</xref></t>
</li>
<li pn="section-toc.1-1.8.2.4">
<t keepWithNext="true" pn="section-toc.1-1.8.2.4.1"><xref derivedContent="8.4" format="counter" sectionFormat="of" target="section-8.4"/>. <xref derivedContent="" format="title" sectionFormat="of" target="name-error-object">Error Object</xref></t>
</li>
<li pn="section-toc.1-1.8.2.5">
<t keepWithNext="true" pn="section-toc.1-1.8.2.5.1"><xref derivedContent="8.5" format="counter" sectionFormat="of" target="section-8.5"/>. <xref derivedContent="" format="title" sectionFormat="of" target="name-notification-object">Notification Object</xref></t>
</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li pn="section-toc.1-1.9">
<t keepWithNext="true" pn="section-toc.1-1.9.1"><xref derivedContent="9" format="counter" sectionFormat="of" target="section-9"/>. <xref derivedContent="" format="title" sectionFormat="of" target="name-references">References</xref></t>
<ul bare="true" empty="true" indent="2" spacing="compact" pn="section-toc.1-1.9.2">
<li pn="section-toc.1-1.9.2.1">
<t keepWithNext="true" pn="section-toc.1-1.9.2.1.1"><xref derivedContent="9.1" format="counter" sectionFormat="of" target="section-9.1"/>. <xref derivedContent="" format="title" sectionFormat="of" target="name-normative-references">Normative References</xref></t>
</li>
<li pn="section-toc.1-1.9.2.2">
<t keepWithNext="true" pn="section-toc.1-1.9.2.2.1"><xref derivedContent="9.2" format="counter" sectionFormat="of" target="section-9.2"/>. <xref derivedContent="" format="title" sectionFormat="of" target="name-informative-references">Informative References</xref></t>
</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li pn="section-toc.1-1.10">
<t keepWithNext="true" pn="section-toc.1-1.10.1"><xref derivedContent="" format="none" sectionFormat="of" target="section-appendix.a"/><xref derivedContent="" format="title" sectionFormat="of" target="name-acknowledgments">Acknowledgments</xref></t>
</li>
<li pn="section-toc.1-1.11">
<t keepWithNext="true" pn="section-toc.1-1.11.1"><xref derivedContent="" format="none" sectionFormat="of" target="section-appendix.b"/><xref derivedContent="" format="title" sectionFormat="of" target="name-contributors">Contributors</xref></t>
</li>
<li pn="section-toc.1-1.12">
<t keepWithNext="true" pn="section-toc.1-1.12.1"><xref derivedContent="" format="none" sectionFormat="of" target="section-appendix.c"/><xref derivedContent="" format="title" sectionFormat="of" target="name-authors-addresses">Authors' Addresses</xref></t>
</li>
</ul>
</section>
</toc>
</front>
<middle>
<section anchor="sect-1" numbered="true" toc="include" removeInRFC="false" pn="section-1">
<name slugifiedName="name-introduction">Introduction</name>
<t pn="section-1-1">
<xref target="RFC5440" format="default" sectionFormat="of" derivedContent="RFC5440"/> describes the Path Computation Element Protocol (PCEP) as a
communication mechanism between a Path Computation Client (PCC) and a
Path Computation Element (PCE), or between a PCE and a PCE, that enables
computation of MPLS-TE Label Switched Paths (LSPs).</t>
<t pn="section-1-2">
<xref target="RFC8231" format="default" sectionFormat="of" derivedContent="RFC8231"/> specifies extensions to PCEP to enable stateful control of
MPLS-TE LSPs. It describes two modes of operation: passive stateful
PCE and active stateful PCE. Further, <xref target="RFC8281" format="default" sectionFormat="of" derivedContent="RFC8281"/> describes the setup,
maintenance, and teardown of PCE-initiated LSPs for the stateful PCE
model. In this document, the focus is on the active stateful PCE, where
the LSPs are controlled by the PCE.</t>
<t pn="section-1-3">
Over time, based on the varying traffic pattern, an LSP established with a
certain bandwidth may require adjustment of the bandwidth reserved in the
network dynamically. The head-end Label Switching Router (LSR) monitors the
actual bandwidth demand of the established LSP and periodically computes
new bandwidth. The head-end LSR automatically adjusts the bandwidth reservation of the
LSP based on the computed bandwidth. This feature, when
available in the head-end LSR implementation, is
commonly referred to as auto-bandwidth. The auto-bandwidth feature is
described in detail in <xref target="sect-4" format="default" sectionFormat="of" derivedContent="Section 4"/> of this
document.</t>
<t pn="section-1-4">
In the model considered in this document, the PCC (head-end of the LSP)
collects the traffic rate samples flowing through the LSP and calculates
the new Adjusted Bandwidth. The PCC reports the calculated bandwidth to be
adjusted to the PCE. This is similar to the passive stateful PCE model:
while the passive stateful PCE uses a path request/reply mechanism, the
active stateful PCE uses a report/update mechanism. With a PCE-initiated LSP, the PCC is requested during the LSP initiation to
monitor and calculate the new Adjusted Bandwidth. <xref target="RFC8051" format="default" sectionFormat="of" derivedContent="RFC8051"/>
describes the use case for auto-bandwidth adjustment for passive and active
stateful PCEs.</t>
<t pn="section-1-5">
Another approach would be to send the measured values themselves to the
PCE, which is considered out of scope for this document.</t>
<t pn="section-1-6">
This document defines the PCEP extensions needed to support an
auto-bandwidth feature in an active stateful PCE model where the LSP
bandwidth to be adjusted is calculated on the PCC (head-end of the
LSP). The use of PCE to calculate the bandwidth to be adjusted is out of
scope of this document.</t>
</section>
<section anchor="sect-2" numbered="true" toc="include" removeInRFC="false" pn="section-2">
<name slugifiedName="name-conventions-used-in-this-do">Conventions Used in This Document</name>
<section anchor="sect-2.1" numbered="true" toc="include" removeInRFC="false" pn="section-2.1">
<name slugifiedName="name-requirements-language">Requirements Language</name>
<t pn="section-2.1-1">
The key words "<bcp14>MUST</bcp14>", "<bcp14>MUST NOT</bcp14>", "<bcp14>REQUIRED</bcp14>", "<bcp14>SHALL</bcp14>", "<bcp14>SHALL NOT</bcp14>", "<bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14>", "<bcp14>SHOULD NOT</bcp14>", "<bcp14>RECOMMENDED</bcp14>", "<bcp14>NOT RECOMMENDED</bcp14>",
"<bcp14>MAY</bcp14>", and "<bcp14>OPTIONAL</bcp14>" in this document are to be interpreted as
described in BCP 14 <xref target="RFC2119" format="default" sectionFormat="of" derivedContent="RFC2119"/> <xref target="RFC8174" format="default" sectionFormat="of" derivedContent="RFC8174"/>
when, and only when, they appear in all capitals, as shown here.
</t>
</section>
<section anchor="sect-2.2" numbered="true" toc="include" removeInRFC="false" pn="section-2.2">
<name slugifiedName="name-abbreviations">Abbreviations</name>
<dl newline="false" spacing="normal" indent="9" pn="section-2.2-1">
<dt pn="section-2.2-1.1">PCC:</dt>
<dd pn="section-2.2-1.2"> Path Computation Client</dd>
<dt pn="section-2.2-1.3">PCE:</dt>
<dd pn="section-2.2-1.4"> Path Computation Element</dd>
<dt pn="section-2.2-1.5">PCEP:</dt>
<dd pn="section-2.2-1.6"> Path Computation Element Communication Protocol</dd>
<dt pn="section-2.2-1.7">TE:</dt>
<dd pn="section-2.2-1.8"> Traffic Engineering</dd>
<dt pn="section-2.2-1.9">LSP:</dt>
<dd pn="section-2.2-1.10">Label Switched Path</dd>
</dl>
</section>
<section anchor="sect-2.3" numbered="true" toc="include" removeInRFC="false" pn="section-2.3">
<name slugifiedName="name-terminology">Terminology</name>
<t pn="section-2.3-1">
The reader is assumed to be familiar with the terminology defined in
<xref target="RFC5440" format="default" sectionFormat="of" derivedContent="RFC5440"/>, <xref target="RFC8231" format="default" sectionFormat="of" derivedContent="RFC8231"/>, and <xref target="RFC8281" format="default" sectionFormat="of" derivedContent="RFC8281"/>.</t>
<t pn="section-2.3-2">
In this document, the PCC is considered to be the head-end LSR of the
LSP. Other types of PCCs are not in scope.</t>
<t pn="section-2.3-3">
The following auto-bandwidth terminology is defined in this document.</t>
<dl newline="false" spacing="normal" indent="3" pn="section-2.3-4">
<dt pn="section-2.3-4.1">Maximum Average Bandwidth (MaxAvgBw):</dt>
<dd pn="section-2.3-4.2">The maximum
average bandwidth represents the current 'measured' traffic bandwidth
demand of the LSP during a time interval. This is the maximum value
of the traffic bandwidth rate samples (Bandwidth-Samples) in a given
time interval.
</dd>
<dt pn="section-2.3-4.3">Adjusted Bandwidth:</dt>
<dd pn="section-2.3-4.4">This is the auto-bandwidth
'computed' bandwidth that is used to adjust the bandwidth reservation
of the LSP.
</dd>
<dt pn="section-2.3-4.5">Sample-Interval:</dt>
<dd pn="section-2.3-4.6">The periodic time interval at which the
measured traffic rate of the LSP is collected as a Bandwidth-Sample.
</dd>
<dt pn="section-2.3-4.7">Bandwidth-Sample:</dt>
<dd pn="section-2.3-4.8">The Bandwidth-Sample of the measured
traffic rate of the LSP collected at every Sample-Interval.
</dd>
<dt pn="section-2.3-4.9">Maximum-Bandwidth:</dt>
<dd pn="section-2.3-4.10">The Maximum-Bandwidth that can be
reserved for the LSP.
</dd>
<dt pn="section-2.3-4.11">Minimum-Bandwidth:</dt>
<dd pn="section-2.3-4.12">The Minimum-Bandwidth that can be
reserved for the LSP.
</dd>
<dt pn="section-2.3-4.13">Up-Adjustment-Interval:</dt>
<dd pn="section-2.3-4.14">The periodic time interval at
which the bandwidth adjustment should be made using the MaxAvgBw when
MaxAvgBw is greater than the current bandwidth reservation of the LSP.
</dd>
<dt pn="section-2.3-4.15">Down-Adjustment-Interval:</dt>
<dd pn="section-2.3-4.16">The periodic time interval at
which the bandwidth adjustment should be made using the MaxAvgBw when
MaxAvgBw is less than the current bandwidth reservation of the LSP.
</dd>
<dt pn="section-2.3-4.17">Up-Adjustment-Threshold:</dt>
<dd pn="section-2.3-4.18">This parameter is used to
decide when the LSP bandwidth should be adjusted. If the percentage
or absolute difference between the current MaxAvgBw and the current
bandwidth reservation is greater than or equal to the threshold value,
the LSP bandwidth is adjusted (upsized) to the current bandwidth
demand (Adjusted Bandwidth) at the Up-Adjustment-Interval expiry.
</dd>
<dt pn="section-2.3-4.19">Down-Adjustment-Threshold:</dt>
<dd pn="section-2.3-4.20">This parameter is used to
decide when the LSP bandwidth should be adjusted. If the percentage
or absolute difference between the current bandwidth reservation and
the current MaxAvgBw is greater than or equal to the threshold value,
the LSP bandwidth is adjusted (downsized) to the current bandwidth
demand (Adjusted Bandwidth) at the Down-Adjustment-Interval expiry.
</dd>
<dt pn="section-2.3-4.21">Overflow-Count:</dt>
<dd pn="section-2.3-4.22">This parameter is used to decide when
the LSP bandwidth should be adjusted when there is a sudden increase
in traffic demand. This value indicates how many times,
consecutively, that the percentage or absolute difference between the
current MaxAvgBw and the current bandwidth reservation of the LSP
needs to be greater than or equal to the Overflow-Threshold value in
order to meet the overflow condition.
</dd>
<dt pn="section-2.3-4.23">Overflow-Threshold:</dt>
<dd pn="section-2.3-4.24">This parameter is used to decide
when the LSP bandwidth should be adjusted when there is a sudden
increase in traffic demand. If the percentage or absolute difference
between the current MaxAvgBw and the current bandwidth reservation of
the LSP is greater than or equal to the threshold value, the overflow
condition is said to be met. The LSP bandwidth is adjusted to the
current bandwidth demand, bypassing the Up-Adjustment-Interval if the
overflow condition is met consecutively for the Overflow-Count. The
Overflow-Threshold needs to be greater than or equal to the
Up-Adjustment-Threshold.
</dd>
<dt pn="section-2.3-4.25">Underflow-Count:</dt>
<dd pn="section-2.3-4.26">This parameter is used to decide when
the LSP bandwidth should be adjusted when there is a sudden decrease
in traffic demand. This value indicates how many times, consecutively,
that the percentage or absolute difference between the current MaxAvgBw and
the current bandwidth reservation of the LSP needs to be greater than
or equal to the Underflow-Threshold value in order to meet the
underflow condition.
</dd>
<dt pn="section-2.3-4.27">Underflow-Threshold:</dt>
<dd pn="section-2.3-4.28">This parameter is used to decide
when the LSP bandwidth should be adjusted when there is a sudden
decrease in traffic demand. If the percentage or absolute difference
between the current MaxAvgBw and the current bandwidth reservation of
the LSP is greater than or equal to the threshold value, the underflow
condition is said to be met. The LSP bandwidth is adjusted to the
current bandwidth demand, bypassing the Down-Adjustment-Interval if the
underflow condition is met consecutively for the Underflow-Count. The
Underflow-Threshold needs to be greater than or equal to the
Down-Adjustment-Threshold.
</dd>
<dt pn="section-2.3-4.29">Minimum-Threshold:</dt>
<dd pn="section-2.3-4.30">When percentage-based thresholds are
in use, they are accompanied by this Minimum-Threshold, which is used
to ensure that the magnitude of deviation of the calculated LSP bandwidth
to be adjusted from the current bandwidth reservations exceeds a
specific non-percentage-based criterion (represented as an absolute
bandwidth value) before any adjustments are made. This serves to
suppress unnecessary auto-bandwidth adjustments and resignaling of
the LSP at low bandwidth values.
</dd>
</dl>
</section>
</section>
<section anchor="sect-3" numbered="true" toc="include" removeInRFC="false" pn="section-3">
<name slugifiedName="name-requirements-for-pcep-exten">Requirements for PCEP Extensions</name>
<t pn="section-3-1">
The PCEP extensions required for auto-bandwidth are summarized in the
following table as well as in <xref target="ure-overview-of-auto-bandwidth-pcep-extensions" format="default" sectionFormat="of" derivedContent="Figure 1"/>.</t>
<table anchor="tab-requirements-for-auto-bandwidth-pcep-extensions" align="center" pn="table-1">
<name slugifiedName="name-requirements-for-auto-bandw">Requirements for Auto-Bandwidth PCEP Extensions</name>
<thead>
<tr>
<th align="left" colspan="1" rowspan="1">PCC Initiated</th>
<th align="left" colspan="1" rowspan="1">PCE Initiated</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td align="left" colspan="1" rowspan="1">PCC monitors the traffic and reports the
calculated bandwidth to be adjusted to the PCE.</td>
<td align="left" colspan="1" rowspan="1">At the time of initiation, the PCE requests that the PCC monitor the traffic and report the calculated bandwidth to be
adjusted to the PCE.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" colspan="1" rowspan="1">
Extension is needed for the PCC to pass on the adjustment
parameters at the time of LSP delegation.</td>
<td align="left" colspan="1" rowspan="1">
Extension is needed for the PCE to pass on the adjustment
parameters at the time of LSP initiation.</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<figure anchor="ure-overview-of-auto-bandwidth-pcep-extensions" align="left" suppress-title="false" pn="figure-1">
<name slugifiedName="name-overview-of-auto-bandwidth-">Overview of Auto-Bandwidth PCEP Extensions</name>
<artwork name="" type="" align="left" alt="" pn="section-3-3.1">
----------
| |
| PCE |
| |
----------
| ^
AUTO-BANDWIDTH CAPABILITY | | AUTO-BANDWIDTH CAPABILITY
| |
AUTO-BANDWIDTH ATTRIBUTES | | AUTO-BANDWIDTH ATTRIBUTES
| | (For Delegated LSPs)
| |
| | REQUESTED BANDWIDTH
v |
----------
| |
| PCC |
| |
----------</artwork>
</figure>
<t pn="section-3-4">
A PCEP speaker supporting this document must have a mechanism to advertise
the auto-bandwidth adjustment capability for both PCC-initiated and
PCE-initiated LSPs.</t>
<t pn="section-3-5">
Auto-bandwidth deployment considerations for PCEP extensions are
summarized below:</t>
<ul spacing="normal" bare="false" empty="false" pn="section-3-6">
<li pn="section-3-6.1">It is necessary to identify and inform the
PCC which LSPs have enabled the auto-bandwidth feature. Not all LSPs
in some deployments would like their bandwidth to be dependent on real-time bandwidth usage; for some LSPs, leaving the bandwidth
constant as set by the operator is preferred.</li>
<li pn="section-3-6.2">In addition, an operator should be able to specify the
auto-bandwidth adjustment parameters (i.e., configuration knobs) to
control this feature (e.g., Minimum/Maximum-Bandwidth range). The PCC
should be informed about these adjustment parameters.</li>
</ul>
</section>
<section anchor="sect-4" numbered="true" toc="include" removeInRFC="false" pn="section-4">
<name slugifiedName="name-architectural-overview">Architectural Overview</name>
<section anchor="sect-4.1" numbered="true" toc="include" removeInRFC="false" pn="section-4.1">
<name slugifiedName="name-auto-bandwidth-overview">Auto-Bandwidth Overview</name>
<t pn="section-4.1-1">
The auto-bandwidth feature allows automatic and dynamic adjustment of
the reserved bandwidth of an LSP over time (i.e., without network
operator intervention) to accommodate the varying traffic demand of
the LSP. If the traffic flowing through the LSP is lower than the
configured or current reserved bandwidth of the LSP, the extra
bandwidth is being reserved needlessly and is being wasted. Conversely,
if the actual traffic flowing through the LSP is higher than the
configured or current reserved bandwidth of the LSP, it can
potentially cause congestion or packet loss in the network. The
initial LSP bandwidth can be set to an arbitrary value (including
zero). In practice, it can be set to an expected value based on
design and planning. The head-end LSR monitors
the actual traffic flowing through the LSP and uses that information
to adjust the bandwidth reservation of the LSP in the network.</t>
<t pn="section-4.1-2">
Bandwidth adjustment must not cause disruption to the traffic flow
carried by the LSP. One way to achieve this is to use the
make-before-break signaling method <xref target="RFC3209" format="default" sectionFormat="of" derivedContent="RFC3209"/>.</t>
</section>
<section anchor="sect-4.2" numbered="true" toc="include" removeInRFC="false" pn="section-4.2">
<name slugifiedName="name-auto-bandwidth-theory-of-op">Auto-Bandwidth Theory of Operation</name>
<t pn="section-4.2-1">
This section describes the auto-bandwidth feature in a general way.
When the auto-bandwidth feature is enabled, the measured traffic rate
is periodically sampled at each Sample-Interval by the PCC when the
PCC is the head-end node of the LSP. The Sample-Interval can be
configured by an operator, with a default value of 5 minutes. A very
low Sample-Interval could have some undesirable interactions with
transport protocols (see <xref target="sect-6.6" format="default" sectionFormat="of" derivedContent="Section 6.6"/>).</t>
<t pn="section-4.2-2">
The traffic rate samples are accumulated over the Adjustment-Interval
period (in the Up or Down direction). The period can be configured
by an operator, with a default value of 24 hours. The PCC in charge
of calculating the bandwidth to be adjusted can decide to adjust the
bandwidth of the LSP to the highest traffic rate sample (MaxAvgBw)
amongst the set of Bandwidth-Samples collected over the
Adjustment-Interval period (in the Up or Down direction) depending on
the operator policy.</t>
<t pn="section-4.2-3">
Note that the highest traffic rate sample could be higher or lower
than the current LSP bandwidth. The LSP is adjusted (upsized) to the
current bandwidth demand (MaxAvgBW) only if the difference between the
current bandwidth demand (MaxAvgBw) and the current bandwidth
reservation is greater than or equal to the Adjustment-Threshold. The Adjustment-Threshold could be an absolute value or a
percentage. The threshold can be configured by an operator, with a
default value of 5 percent. Similarly, if the difference between
the current bandwidth reservation and the current bandwidth demand
(MaxAvgBw) is greater than or equal to the Down-Adjustment-Threshold
(percentage or absolute value), the LSP bandwidth is adjusted
(downsized) to the current bandwidth demand (MaxAvgBw). Some LSPs
are less eventful, while other LSPs may encounter a lot of changes in
the traffic pattern. The thresholds and intervals for bandwidth
adjustment are configured based on the traffic pattern of the LSP.</t>
<t pn="section-4.2-4">
In order to avoid frequent resignaling, an operator may set a longer
Adjustment-Interval value (Up and/or Down). However, a longer
Adjustment-Interval can result in the undesirable effect of masking
sudden changes in the traffic demands of an LSP. To avoid this, the
auto-bandwidth feature may force the Adjustment-Interval to prematurely
expire and adjust the LSP bandwidth to accommodate the sudden bursts of
increase in traffic demand as an overflow condition or decrease in
traffic demand as an underflow condition. An operator needs to
configure appropriate values for the Overflow-Threshold and/or
Underflow-Threshold parameters, and they do not have default values
defined in this document.</t>
<t pn="section-4.2-5">
All thresholds in this document could be represented in both absolute
value and percentage and could be used together. This is provided
to accommodate cases where the LSP bandwidth reservation may
become very large or very small over time. For example, an operator
may use the percentage threshold to handle small to large bandwidth
values and absolute values to handle very large bandwidth values.
The auto-bandwidth adjustment is made when either one of the two
thresholds, the absolute or percentage, is crossed.</t>
<t pn="section-4.2-6">
When using the (adjustment/overflow/underflow) percentage thresholds,
if the LSP bandwidth changes rapidly at very low values, it may
trigger frequent auto-bandwidth adjustments due to the crossing of
the percentage thresholds. This can lead to unnecessary resignaling
of the LSPs in the network. This is suppressed by setting the
Minimum-Threshold parameters along with the percentage thresholds.
The auto-bandwidth adjustment is only made if the LSP bandwidth
crosses both the percentage threshold and the Minimum-Threshold
parameters.</t>
</section>
<section anchor="sect-4.3" numbered="true" toc="include" removeInRFC="false" pn="section-4.3">
<name slugifiedName="name-scaling-considerations">Scaling Considerations</name>
<t pn="section-4.3-1">
It should be noted that any bandwidth change requires resignaling of
an LSP, which can further trigger preemption of lower-priority LSPs
in the network. When deployed under scale, this can lead to a
signaling churn in the network. The auto-bandwidth application
algorithm is thus advised to take this into consideration before
adjusting the LSP bandwidth. Operators are advised to set the values
of various auto-bandwidth adjustment parameters appropriate for the
deployed LSP scale.</t>
<t pn="section-4.3-2">
If a PCE gets overwhelmed, it can notify the PCC to temporarily
suspend the reporting of the new LSP bandwidth to be adjusted. Similarly,
if a PCC gets overwhelmed due to signaling churn, it can notify the PCE to temporarily suspend
new LSP setup requests. See <xref target="sect-5.7" format="default" sectionFormat="of" derivedContent="Section 5.7"/> of this document.</t>
</section>
</section>
<section anchor="sect-5" numbered="true" toc="include" removeInRFC="false" pn="section-5">
<name slugifiedName="name-pcep-extensions">PCEP Extensions</name>
<section anchor="sect-5.1" numbered="true" toc="include" removeInRFC="false" pn="section-5.1">
<name slugifiedName="name-capability-advertisement">Capability Advertisement</name>
<t pn="section-5.1-1">
During the PCEP initialization phase, PCEP speakers (PCE or PCC)
advertise their support of the auto-bandwidth adjustment feature. A
PCEP speaker includes the AUTO-BANDWIDTH-CAPABILITY TLV in the OPEN
object to advertise its support for PCEP auto-bandwidth extensions.
The presence of the AUTO-BANDWIDTH-CAPABILITY TLV in the OPEN object
indicates that the auto-bandwidth feature is supported as
described in this document.</t>
<ul spacing="normal" bare="false" empty="false" pn="section-5.1-2">
<li pn="section-5.1-2.1">The PCEP protocol extensions for auto-bandwidth adjustments <bcp14>MUST NOT</bcp14> be used if one or both PCEP speakers have not included the
AUTO-BANDWIDTH-CAPABILITY TLV in their respective OPEN message.</li>
<li pn="section-5.1-2.2">A PCEP speaker that does not recognize the extensions defined in
this document would simply ignore the TLVs as per <xref target="RFC5440" format="default" sectionFormat="of" derivedContent="RFC5440"/>.</li>
<li pn="section-5.1-2.3">If a PCEP speaker supports the extensions defined in this
document but did not advertise this capability, then upon receipt
of AUTO-BANDWIDTH-ATTRIBUTES TLV in the LSP Attributes (LSPA)
object, it <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> generate a PCErr with Error-Type 19 (Invalid
Operation) and Error-value 14 (Auto-Bandwidth capability was not
advertised) and ignore the AUTO-BANDWIDTH-ATTRIBUTES TLV.</li>
</ul>
<section anchor="sect-5.1.1" numbered="true" toc="include" removeInRFC="false" pn="section-5.1.1">
<name slugifiedName="name-auto-bandwidth-capability-t">AUTO-BANDWIDTH-CAPABILITY TLV</name>
<t pn="section-5.1.1-1">
The AUTO-BANDWIDTH-CAPABILITY TLV is an optional TLV for use in the
OPEN Object for auto-bandwidth adjustment via PCEP capability
advertisement. Its format is shown in the following figure:</t>
<figure anchor="auto-bandwidth-capability-tlv" align="left" suppress-title="false" pn="figure-2">
<name slugifiedName="name-auto-bandwidth-capability-tl">AUTO-BANDWIDTH-CAPABILITY TLV Format</name>
<artwork name="" type="" align="left" alt="" pn="section-5.1.1-2.1">
0 1 2 3
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Type=36 | Length=4 |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Flag |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+</artwork>
</figure>
<t pn="section-5.1.1-3">
The TLV Type is 36, and it has a fixed Length of 4 octets.</t>
<t pn="section-5.1.1-4">
The value comprises a single field: Flag (32 bits). No flags are
defined for this TLV in this document.</t>
<t pn="section-5.1.1-5">
Unassigned bits are considered reserved. They <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be set to 0 on
transmission and <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be ignored on receipt.</t>
<t pn="section-5.1.1-6">
Advertisement of the AUTO-BANDWIDTH-CAPABILITY TLV implies support of
auto-bandwidth adjustment, as well as the objects, TLVs, and
procedures defined in this document.</t>
</section>
</section>
<section anchor="sect-5.2" numbered="true" toc="include" removeInRFC="false" pn="section-5.2">
<name slugifiedName="name-auto-bandwidth-attributes-t">AUTO-BANDWIDTH-ATTRIBUTES TLV</name>
<t pn="section-5.2-1">
The AUTO-BANDWIDTH-ATTRIBUTES TLV provides the 'configurable knobs'
of the feature, and it can be included as an optional TLV in the LSPA
object (as described in <xref target="RFC5440" format="default" sectionFormat="of" derivedContent="RFC5440"/>).</t>
<t pn="section-5.2-2">
For a PCE-initiated LSP <xref target="RFC8281" format="default" sectionFormat="of" derivedContent="RFC8281"/>, this TLV is included in the LSPA
object with the PCInitiate message. For the PCC-initiated delegated
LSPs, this TLV is carried in the Path Computation State Report (PCRpt) message in the LSPA object. This
TLV is also carried in the LSPA object with the Path Computation Update
Request (PCUpd) message to
direct the PCC (LSP head-end) to make updates to auto-bandwidth
attributes such as Adjustment-Interval.</t>
<t pn="section-5.2-3">
The TLV is encoded in all PCEP messages for the LSP while the
auto-bandwidth adjustment feature is enabled. The absence of the TLV
indicates the PCEP speaker wishes to disable the feature. This TLV
includes multiple AUTO-BANDWIDTH-ATTRIBUTES sub-TLVs. The
AUTO-BANDWIDTH-ATTRIBUTES sub-TLVs are included if there is a change since
the last information sent in the PCEP message. The default values for
missing sub-TLVs apply for the first PCEP message for the LSP.</t>
<t pn="section-5.2-4">
The format of the AUTO-BANDWIDTH-ATTRIBUTES TLV is shown in the
following figure:</t>
<figure anchor="AUTO-BANDWIDTH-ATTRIBUTES-TLV" align="left" suppress-title="false" pn="figure-3">
<name slugifiedName="name-auto-bandwidth-attributes-tl">AUTO-BANDWIDTH-ATTRIBUTES TLV Format</name>
<artwork name="" type="" align="left" alt="" pn="section-5.2-5.1">
0 1 2 3
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Type=37 | Length |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| |
// sub-TLVs //
| |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+</artwork>
</figure>
<dl newline="false" spacing="normal" indent="3" pn="section-5.2-6">
<dt pn="section-5.2-6.1">Type:</dt>
<dd pn="section-5.2-6.2">37</dd>
<dt pn="section-5.2-6.3">Length:</dt>
<dd pn="section-5.2-6.4">The Length field defines the length of the value
portion in bytes as per <xref target="RFC5440" format="default" sectionFormat="of" derivedContent="RFC5440"/>.</dd>
<dt pn="section-5.2-6.5">Value:</dt>
<dd pn="section-5.2-6.6">This comprises one or more sub-TLVs.</dd>
</dl>
<t pn="section-5.2-7">
The following sub-TLVs are defined in this document:</t>
<table anchor="subTLV" align="left" pn="table-2">
<name slugifiedName="name-sub-tlv-types-of-the-auto-b">Sub-TLV Types of the AUTO-BANDWIDTH-ATTRIBUTES TLV</name>
<thead>
<tr>
<th align="left" colspan="1" rowspan="1">Type</th>
<th align="left" colspan="1" rowspan="1">Len</th>
<th align="left" colspan="1" rowspan="1">Name</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td align="left" colspan="1" rowspan="1">1</td>
<td align="left" colspan="1" rowspan="1">4</td>
<td align="left" colspan="1" rowspan="1">Sample-Interval </td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" colspan="1" rowspan="1">2</td>
<td align="left" colspan="1" rowspan="1">4</td>
<td align="left" colspan="1" rowspan="1">Adjustment-Interval </td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" colspan="1" rowspan="1">3</td>
<td align="left" colspan="1" rowspan="1">4</td>
<td align="left" colspan="1" rowspan="1">Down-Adjustment-Interval </td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" colspan="1" rowspan="1">4</td>
<td align="left" colspan="1" rowspan="1">4</td>
<td align="left" colspan="1" rowspan="1">Adjustment-Threshold </td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" colspan="1" rowspan="1">5</td>
<td align="left" colspan="1" rowspan="1">8</td>
<td align="left" colspan="1" rowspan="1">Adjustment-Threshold-Percentage </td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" colspan="1" rowspan="1">6</td>
<td align="left" colspan="1" rowspan="1">4</td>
<td align="left" colspan="1" rowspan="1">Down-Adjustment-Threshold </td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" colspan="1" rowspan="1">7</td>
<td align="left" colspan="1" rowspan="1">8</td>
<td align="left" colspan="1" rowspan="1">Down-Adjustment-Threshold-Percentage </td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" colspan="1" rowspan="1">8</td>
<td align="left" colspan="1" rowspan="1">4</td>
<td align="left" colspan="1" rowspan="1">Minimum-Bandwidth </td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" colspan="1" rowspan="1">9</td>
<td align="left" colspan="1" rowspan="1">4</td>
<td align="left" colspan="1" rowspan="1">Maximum-Bandwidth </td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" colspan="1" rowspan="1">10</td>
<td align="left" colspan="1" rowspan="1">8</td>
<td align="left" colspan="1" rowspan="1">Overflow-Threshold </td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" colspan="1" rowspan="1">11</td>
<td align="left" colspan="1" rowspan="1">8</td>
<td align="left" colspan="1" rowspan="1">Overflow-Threshold-Percentage </td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" colspan="1" rowspan="1">12</td>
<td align="left" colspan="1" rowspan="1">8</td>
<td align="left" colspan="1" rowspan="1">Underflow-Threshold </td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" colspan="1" rowspan="1">13</td>
<td align="left" colspan="1" rowspan="1">8</td>
<td align="left" colspan="1" rowspan="1">Underflow-Threshold-Percentage </td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<t pn="section-5.2-9">
Future specifications can define additional sub-TLVs.</t>
<t pn="section-5.2-10">
The sub-TLVs are encoded to inform the PCEP peer of the various
sampling and adjustment parameters. In the case of a missing sub-TLV, as
per the local policy, either the default value (as specified in this
document) or some other operator-configured value is used.</t>
<t pn="section-5.2-11">
All sub-TLVs are optional, and any unrecognized sub-TLV <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be
ignored. If a sub-TLV of the same type appears more than once, only
the first occurrence is processed, and all others <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be ignored.</t>
<t pn="section-5.2-12">
The following subsections describe the sub-TLVs that are currently
defined as being carried within the AUTO-BANDWIDTH-ATTRIBUTES TLV.</t>
<section anchor="sect-5.2.1" numbered="true" toc="include" removeInRFC="false" pn="section-5.2.1">
<name slugifiedName="name-sample-interval-sub-tlv">Sample-Interval Sub-TLV</name>
<t pn="section-5.2.1-1">
The Sample-Interval sub-TLV specifies a time interval in seconds in
which traffic samples are collected at the PCC.</t>
<figure anchor="Sample-Interval-sub-TLV" align="left" suppress-title="false" pn="figure-4">
<name slugifiedName="name-sample-interval-sub-tlv-for">Sample-Interval Sub-TLV Format</name>
<artwork name="" type="" align="left" alt="" pn="section-5.2.1-2.1">
0 1 2 3
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Type=1 | Length=4 |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Sample-Interval |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+</artwork>
</figure>
<t pn="section-5.2.1-3">
The Type is 1, the Length is 4 octets, and the value comprises the following:</t>
<dl newline="false" spacing="normal" indent="3" pn="section-5.2.1-4">
<dt pn="section-5.2.1-4.1">Sample-Interval:</dt>
<dd pn="section-5.2.1-4.2">The 4-octet time interval for the Bandwidth-Sample collection. The valid range is from 1 to 604800 (7
days), in seconds. The default value is 300 seconds. Due care needs
to be taken in a case with a very low Sample-Interval, as it can have some
undesirable interactions with transport protocols (see <xref target="sect-6.6" format="default" sectionFormat="of" derivedContent="Section 6.6"/>). The Sample-Interval parameter <bcp14>MUST NOT</bcp14> be
greater than the (down) Adjustment-Interval. In the case in which an invalid
value is present, the sub-TLV <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be ignored and the
previous value will be maintained.</dd>
</dl>
</section>
<section anchor="sect-5.2.2" numbered="true" toc="include" removeInRFC="false" pn="section-5.2.2">
<name slugifiedName="name-adjustment-intervals">Adjustment-Intervals</name>
<t pn="section-5.2.2-1"> The
sub-TLVs in this section are encoded to inform the PCEP peer of the
Adjustment-Interval parameters. The Adjustment-Interval sub-TLV
specifies the time interval for both upward (Up-Adjustment-Interval)
and downward (Down-Adjustment-Interval) trends. An implementation <bcp14>MAY</bcp14>
require that a different Adjustment-Interval value be set when the
bandwidth usage trend is moving downwards from the one used when it is moving upwards. In
that case, the operator could use the Down-Adjustment-Interval sub-TLV,
which overrides the Adjustment-Interval value for
Down-Adjustment-Interval.</t>
<section anchor="sect-5.2.2.1" numbered="true" toc="include" removeInRFC="false" pn="section-5.2.2.1">
<name slugifiedName="name-adjustment-interval-sub-tlv">Adjustment-Interval Sub-TLV</name>
<t pn="section-5.2.2.1-1">
The Adjustment-Interval sub-TLV specifies a time interval in seconds
in which a bandwidth adjustment should be made in an upward or downward
direction. This sub-TLV specifies the value for Up-Adjustment-Interval
and Down-Adjustment-Interval when they are the same and when the
Down-Adjustment-Interval sub-TLV is not included.</t>
<figure anchor="Adjustment-Interval-sub-TLV" align="left" suppress-title="false" pn="figure-5">
<name slugifiedName="name-adjustment-interval-sub-tlv-">Adjustment-Interval Sub-TLV Format</name>
<artwork name="" type="" align="left" alt="" pn="section-5.2.2.1-2.1">
0 1 2 3
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Type=2 | Length=4 |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Adjustment-Interval |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+</artwork>
</figure>
<t pn="section-5.2.2.1-3">The Type is 2, the Length is 4 octets, and the value comprises the following:</t>
<dl newline="false" spacing="normal" indent="3" pn="section-5.2.2.1-4">
<dt pn="section-5.2.2.1-4.1">Adjustment-Interval:</dt>
<dd pn="section-5.2.2.1-4.2">The 4-octet time interval for
bandwidth adjustments. The valid range is from 1 to 604800 (7 days), in
seconds. The default value is 86400 seconds (1 day). The
Adjustment-Interval parameter <bcp14>MUST NOT</bcp14> be less than the Sample-Interval;
otherwise, the sub-TLV <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be ignored, and the previous
value will be
maintained.</dd>
</dl>
</section>
<section anchor="sect-5.2.2.2" numbered="true" toc="include" removeInRFC="false" pn="section-5.2.2.2">
<name slugifiedName="name-down-adjustment-interval-su">Down-Adjustment-Interval Sub-TLV</name>
<t pn="section-5.2.2.2-1">
The Down-Adjustment-Interval sub-TLV specifies a time interval in
seconds in which a bandwidth adjustment should be made when MaxAvgBw is
less than the current bandwidth reservation of the LSP. This
parameter overrides the Adjustment-Interval for the downward trend.
This sub-TLV is used only when there is a need for different
Adjustment-Intervals in the upward and downward directions.</t>
<figure anchor="Down-Adjustment-Interval-sub-TLV" align="left" suppress-title="false" pn="figure-6">
<name slugifiedName="name-down-adjustment-interval-sub">Down-Adjustment-Interval Sub-TLV Format</name>
<artwork name="" type="" align="left" alt="" pn="section-5.2.2.2-2.1">
0 1 2 3
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Type=3 | Length=4 |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Down-Adjustment-Interval |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+</artwork>
</figure>
<t pn="section-5.2.2.2-3">The Type is 3, the Length is 4 octets, and the value comprises the following: </t>
<dl newline="false" spacing="normal" indent="3" pn="section-5.2.2.2-4">
<dt pn="section-5.2.2.2-4.1">Down-Adjustment-Interval:</dt>
<dd pn="section-5.2.2.2-4.2">The 4-octet time
interval for downward bandwidth adjustments. The valid range is from
1 to 604800 (7 days), in seconds. The default value equals the
Adjustment-Interval. The Down-Adjustment-Interval parameter <bcp14>MUST NOT</bcp14>
be less than the Sample-Interval; otherwise, the sub-TLV <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be
ignored and the previous value will be maintained.</dd>
</dl>
</section>
</section>
<section anchor="sect-5.2.3" numbered="true" toc="include" removeInRFC="false" pn="section-5.2.3">
<name slugifiedName="name-adjustment-thresholds">Adjustment-Thresholds</name>
<t pn="section-5.2.3-1"> The
sub-TLVs in this section are encoded to inform the PCEP peer of the
Adjustment-Threshold parameters. An implementation <bcp14>MAY</bcp14> include both
sub-TLVs for the absolute value and the percentage, in which case the
bandwidth is adjusted when either of the Adjustment-Threshold
conditions are met. The Adjustment-Threshold sub-TLV specifies the
threshold for both upward (Up-Adjustment-Threshold) and downward
(Down-Adjustment-Threshold) trends. If the operator would like to use
a different Adjustment-Threshold during the downward trend, the
Down-Adjustment-Threshold sub-TLV is included. Similarly, the
Adjustment-Threshold-Percentage sub-TLV specifies the threshold
percentage for both upward and downward trends. If the operator would
like to use a different Adjustment-Threshold percentage during the
downward trend, the Down-Adjustment-Threshold-Percentage sub-TLV is
included. It is worth noting that regardless of how the thresholds are
set, the adjustment will not be made until at least one
Sample-Interval has passed simply because no sample will be made on which to base
a comparison with a threshold.</t>
<section anchor="sect-5.2.3.1" numbered="true" toc="include" removeInRFC="false" pn="section-5.2.3.1">
<name slugifiedName="name-adjustment-threshold-sub-tl">Adjustment-Threshold Sub-TLV</name>
<t pn="section-5.2.3.1-1">The Adjustment-Threshold sub-TLV is used to
decide when the LSP bandwidth should be adjusted in an upward or downward
direction. This sub-TLV specifies the absolute value for
Up-Adjustment-Threshold and Down-Adjustment-Threshold when they are
the same and when the Down-Adjustment-Threshold sub-TLV is not
included.</t>
<figure anchor="Adjustment-Threshold-sub-TLV" align="left" suppress-title="false" pn="figure-7">
<name slugifiedName="name-adjustment-threshold-sub-tlv">Adjustment-Threshold Sub-TLV Format</name>
<artwork name="" type="" align="left" alt="" pn="section-5.2.3.1-2.1">
0 1 2 3
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Type=4 | Length=4 |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Adjustment-Threshold |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+</artwork>
</figure>
<t pn="section-5.2.3.1-3"> The Type is 4, the Length is 4 octets, and the value comprises the following: </t>
<dl newline="false" spacing="normal" indent="3" pn="section-5.2.3.1-4">
<dt pn="section-5.2.3.1-4.1">Adjustment-Threshold:</dt>
<dd pn="section-5.2.3.1-4.2">The absolute Adjustment-Threshold
bandwidth difference value, encoded in IEEE floating point format (see
<xref target="IEEE.754.1985" format="default" sectionFormat="of" derivedContent="IEEE.754.1985"/>) and expressed in bytes per second. The
default Adjustment-Threshold value is not set. Refer to <xref target="RFC3471" sectionFormat="of" section="3.1.2" format="default" derivedLink="https://rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc3471#section-3.1.2" derivedContent="RFC3471"/> for a table of commonly used values.</dd>
</dl>
<t pn="section-5.2.3.1-5">
If the modulus of difference between the current MaxAvgBw and the
current bandwidth reservation is greater than or equal to the
threshold value, the LSP bandwidth is adjusted to the current
bandwidth demand (MaxAvgBw).</t>
<t pn="section-5.2.3.1-6">
In the case in which an invalid value is present, the sub-TLV
<bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be ignored and the
previous value will be maintained.</t>
</section>
<section anchor="sect-5.2.3.2" numbered="true" toc="include" removeInRFC="false" pn="section-5.2.3.2">
<name slugifiedName="name-adjustment-threshold-percen">Adjustment-Threshold-Percentage Sub-TLV</name>
<t pn="section-5.2.3.2-1">The Adjustment-Threshold-Percentage sub-TLV
is used to decide when the LSP bandwidth should be adjusted in an upward
or downward direction. This sub-TLV specifies the percentage value for
Up-Adjustment-Threshold and Down-Adjustment-Threshold when they are
the same and when the Down-Adjustment-Threshold-Percentage sub-TLV is not
included.</t>
<figure anchor="Adjustment-Threshold-Percentage-sub-TLV" align="left" suppress-title="false" pn="figure-8">
<name slugifiedName="name-adjustment-threshold-percent">Adjustment-Threshold-Percentage Sub-TLV Format</name>
<artwork name="" type="" align="left" alt="" pn="section-5.2.3.2-2.1">
0 1 2 3
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Type=5 | Length=8 |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Reserved | Percentage |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Minimum-Threshold |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+</artwork>
</figure>
<t pn="section-5.2.3.2-3">The Type is 5, the Length is 8 octets, and the value comprises the following: </t>
<dl newline="false" spacing="normal" indent="3" pn="section-5.2.3.2-4">
<dt pn="section-5.2.3.2-4.1">Reserved:</dt>
<dd pn="section-5.2.3.2-4.2">
<bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be set to zero on transmission and <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be
ignored on receipt.</dd>
<dt pn="section-5.2.3.2-4.3">Percentage:</dt>
<dd pn="section-5.2.3.2-4.4">The Adjustment-Threshold value (7 bits),
encoded in a percentage (an integer from 1 to 100). The value 0 is
considered to be invalid. The default value is 5 percent.</dd>
<dt pn="section-5.2.3.2-4.5">Minimum-Threshold:</dt>
<dd pn="section-5.2.3.2-4.6">The absolute Minimum-Threshold
bandwidth value, encoded in IEEE floating point format (see <xref target="IEEE.754.1985" format="default" sectionFormat="of" derivedContent="IEEE.754.1985"/>) and expressed in bytes per second. The increase
or decrease of the LSP bandwidth <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be at or above the
Minimum-Threshold before the bandwidth adjustment is made. The default
value is 0.</dd>
</dl>
<t pn="section-5.2.3.2-5">
If the percentage absolute difference between the current MaxAvgBw
and the current bandwidth reservation is greater than or equal to the
threshold percentage and the difference in the bandwidth is at or above the Minimum-Threshold, the LSP bandwidth is adjusted to the
current bandwidth demand (MaxAvgBw).</t>
<t pn="section-5.2.3.2-6">
In the case in which an invalid value is present, the sub-TLV <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be ignored and the
previous value will be maintained.</t>
</section>
<section anchor="sect-5.2.3.3" numbered="true" toc="include" removeInRFC="false" pn="section-5.2.3.3">
<name slugifiedName="name-down-adjustment-threshold-s">Down-Adjustment-Threshold Sub-TLV</name>
<t pn="section-5.2.3.3-1">The Down-Adjustment-Threshold sub-TLV is
used to decide when the LSP bandwidth should be adjusted when MaxAvgBw
is less than the current bandwidth reservation. This parameter
overrides the Adjustment-Threshold for the downward trend. This
sub-TLV is used only when there is a need for a different threshold in
the upward and downward directions.</t>
<figure anchor="Down-Adjustment-Threshold-sub-TLV" align="left" suppress-title="false" pn="figure-9">
<name slugifiedName="name-down-adjustment-threshold-su">Down-Adjustment-Threshold Sub-TLV Format</name>
<artwork name="" type="" align="left" alt="" pn="section-5.2.3.3-2.1">
0 1 2 3
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Type=6 | Length=4 |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Down-Adjustment-Threshold |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+</artwork>
</figure>
<t pn="section-5.2.3.3-3">The Type is 6, the Length is 4 octets, and the value comprises the following: </t>
<dl newline="false" spacing="normal" indent="3" pn="section-5.2.3.3-4">
<dt pn="section-5.2.3.3-4.1">Down-Adjustment-Threshold:</dt>
<dd pn="section-5.2.3.3-4.2">The absolute
Down-Adjustment-Threshold bandwidth value, encoded in IEEE floating
point format (see <xref target="IEEE.754.1985" format="default" sectionFormat="of" derivedContent="IEEE.754.1985"/>) and expressed in bytes
per second. The default value equals the Adjustment-Threshold. Refer
to <xref target="RFC3471" sectionFormat="of" section="3.1.2" format="default" derivedLink="https://rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc3471#section-3.1.2" derivedContent="RFC3471"/> for a table of commonly
used values.
</dd>
</dl>
<t pn="section-5.2.3.3-5">
If the difference between the current bandwidth reservation and the
current MaxAvgBw is greater than or equal to the threshold value, the
LSP bandwidth is adjusted to the current bandwidth demand (MaxAvgBw).</t>
<t pn="section-5.2.3.3-6">
In the case in which an invalid value is present, the sub-TLV <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be ignored and the
previous value will be maintained.</t>
</section>
<section anchor="sect-5.2.3.4" numbered="true" toc="include" removeInRFC="false" pn="section-5.2.3.4">
<name slugifiedName="name-down-adjustment-threshold-p">Down-Adjustment-Threshold-Percentage Sub-TLV</name>
<t pn="section-5.2.3.4-1">
The Down-Adjustment-Threshold-Percentage sub-TLV is used to decide
when the LSP bandwidth should be adjusted when MaxAvgBw is less than the current bandwidth reservation. This parameter overrides the
Adjustment-Threshold-Percentage for the downward trend. This sub-TLV
is used only when there is a need for a different threshold percentage
in the upward and downward directions.</t>
<figure anchor="Down-Adjustment-Threshold-Percentage-sub-TLV" align="left" suppress-title="false" pn="figure-10">
<name slugifiedName="name-down-adjustment-threshold-pe">Down-Adjustment-Threshold-Percentage Sub-TLV Format</name>
<artwork name="" type="" align="left" alt="" pn="section-5.2.3.4-2.1">
0 1 2 3
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Type=7 | Length=8 |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Reserved | Percentage |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Minimum-Threshold |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+</artwork>
</figure>
<t pn="section-5.2.3.4-3">The Type is 7, the Length is 8 octets, and the value comprises the following:</t>
<dl newline="false" spacing="normal" indent="3" pn="section-5.2.3.4-4">
<dt pn="section-5.2.3.4-4.1">Reserved:</dt>
<dd pn="section-5.2.3.4-4.2">
<bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be set to zero on transmission and <bcp14>MUST</bcp14>
be ignored on receipt.</dd>
<dt pn="section-5.2.3.4-4.3">Percentage:</dt>
<dd pn="section-5.2.3.4-4.4">The Down-Adjustment-Threshold value (7 bits),
encoded in a percentage (an integer from 1 to 100). The value 0 is
considered to be invalid. The default value equals the
Adjustment-Threshold-Percentage.</dd>
<dt pn="section-5.2.3.4-4.5">Minimum-Threshold:</dt>
<dd pn="section-5.2.3.4-4.6">The absolute Minimum-Threshold
bandwidth value, encoded in IEEE floating point format (see <xref target="IEEE.754.1985" format="default" sectionFormat="of" derivedContent="IEEE.754.1985"/>) and expressed in bytes per second. The decrease
of the LSP bandwidth <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be at or above the Minimum-Threshold
before the bandwidth adjustment is made. The default value equals the
Minimum-Threshold for the Adjustment-Threshold-Percentage.</dd>
</dl>
<t pn="section-5.2.3.4-5">
If the percentage difference between the current bandwidth
reservation and the current MaxAvgBw is greater than or equal to the
threshold percentage and the difference in the bandwidth is at or above the Minimum-Threshold, the LSP bandwidth is adjusted to the
current bandwidth demand (MaxAvgBw).</t>
<t pn="section-5.2.3.4-6">
In the case in which an invalid value is present, the sub-TLV <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be ignored and the
previous value will be maintained.</t>
</section>
</section>
<section anchor="sect-5.2.4" numbered="true" toc="include" removeInRFC="false" pn="section-5.2.4">
<name slugifiedName="name-minimum-and-maximum-bandwid">Minimum and Maximum-Bandwidth Values</name>
<section anchor="sect-5.2.4.1" numbered="true" toc="include" removeInRFC="false" pn="section-5.2.4.1">
<name slugifiedName="name-minimum-bandwidth-sub-tlv">Minimum-Bandwidth Sub-TLV</name>
<t pn="section-5.2.4.1-1">
The Minimum-Bandwidth sub-TLV specifies the Minimum-Bandwidth allowed
for the LSP and is expressed in bytes per second. The LSP bandwidth
cannot be adjusted below the Minimum-Bandwidth value.</t>
<figure anchor="Minimum-Bandwidth-sub-TLV" align="left" suppress-title="false" pn="figure-11">
<name slugifiedName="name-minimum-bandwidth-sub-tlv-f">Minimum-Bandwidth Sub-TLV Format</name>
<artwork name="" type="" align="left" alt="" pn="section-5.2.4.1-2.1">
0 1 2 3
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Type=8 | Length=4 |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Minimum-Bandwidth |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+</artwork>
</figure>
<t pn="section-5.2.4.1-3">The Type is 8, the Length is 4 octets, and the value comprises the following: </t>
<dl newline="false" spacing="normal" indent="3" pn="section-5.2.4.1-4">
<dt pn="section-5.2.4.1-4.1">Minimum-Bandwidth:</dt>
<dd pn="section-5.2.4.1-4.2">The 4-octet bandwidth value encoded in
IEEE floating point format (see <xref target="IEEE.754.1985" format="default" sectionFormat="of" derivedContent="IEEE.754.1985"/>) and
expressed in bytes per second. The default Minimum-Bandwidth value is set
to 0. Refer to <xref target="RFC3471" sectionFormat="of" section="3.1.2" format="default" derivedLink="https://rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc3471#section-3.1.2" derivedContent="RFC3471"/> for a table of
commonly used values.</dd>
</dl>
<t pn="section-5.2.4.1-5">
In the case in which an invalid value is present, the sub-TLV <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be ignored and the
previous value will be maintained.</t>
</section>
<section anchor="sect-5.2.4.2" numbered="true" toc="include" removeInRFC="false" pn="section-5.2.4.2">
<name slugifiedName="name-maximum-bandwidth-sub-tlv">Maximum-Bandwidth Sub-TLV</name>
<t pn="section-5.2.4.2-1">
The Maximum-Bandwidth sub-TLV specifies the Maximum-Bandwidth allowed
for the LSP and is expressed in bytes per second. The LSP bandwidth
cannot be adjusted above the Maximum-Bandwidth value.</t>
<figure anchor="Maximum-Bandwidth-sub-TLV" align="left" suppress-title="false" pn="figure-12">
<name slugifiedName="name-maximum-bandwidth-sub-tlv-f">Maximum-Bandwidth Sub-TLV Format</name>
<artwork name="" type="" align="left" alt="" pn="section-5.2.4.2-2.1">
0 1 2 3
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Type=9 | Length=4 |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Maximum-Bandwidth |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+</artwork>
</figure>
<t pn="section-5.2.4.2-3">The Type is 9, the Length is 4 octets, and the value comprises the following: </t>
<dl newline="false" spacing="normal" indent="3" pn="section-5.2.4.2-4">
<dt pn="section-5.2.4.2-4.1">Maximum-Bandwidth:</dt>
<dd pn="section-5.2.4.2-4.2">The 4-octet bandwidth value encoded in
IEEE floating point format (see <xref target="IEEE.754.1985" format="default" sectionFormat="of" derivedContent="IEEE.754.1985"/>) and expressed in bytes per second. The default Maximum-Bandwidth value is
not set. Refer to <xref target="RFC3471" sectionFormat="of" section="3.1.2" format="default" derivedLink="https://rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc3471#section-3.1.2" derivedContent="RFC3471"/> for a table
of commonly used values.</dd>
</dl>
<t pn="section-5.2.4.2-5">
In the case in which an invalid value is present, the sub-TLV <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be ignored and the
previous value will be maintained.</t>
</section>
</section>
<section anchor="sect-5.2.5" numbered="true" toc="include" removeInRFC="false" pn="section-5.2.5">
<name slugifiedName="name-overflow-and-underflow-cond">Overflow and Underflow Conditions</name>
<t pn="section-5.2.5-1">
The sub-TLVs in this section are encoded to inform the PCEP peer of the
overflow and underflow threshold parameters. An implementation <bcp14>MAY</bcp14>
include sub-TLVs for an absolute value and/or a percentage for the
threshold, in which case the bandwidth is immediately adjusted when
either of the threshold conditions is met consecutively for the given
count (as long as the difference in the bandwidth is at or
above the Minimum-Threshold). By default, the threshold values for
overflow and underflow conditions are not set.</t>
<section anchor="sect-5.2.5.1" numbered="true" toc="include" removeInRFC="false" pn="section-5.2.5.1">
<name slugifiedName="name-overflow-threshold-sub-tlv">Overflow-Threshold Sub-TLV</name>
<t pn="section-5.2.5.1-1">
The Overflow-Threshold sub-TLV is used to decide if the LSP bandwidth
should be adjusted immediately.</t>
<figure anchor="Overflow-Threshold-sub-TLV" align="left" suppress-title="false" pn="figure-13">
<name slugifiedName="name-overflow-threshold-sub-tlv-">Overflow-Threshold Sub-TLV Format</name>
<artwork name="" type="" align="left" alt="" pn="section-5.2.5.1-2.1">
0 1 2 3
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Type=10 | Length=8 |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Reserved | Count |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Overflow-Threshold |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+</artwork>
</figure>
<t pn="section-5.2.5.1-3">The Type is 10, the Length is 8 octets, and the value comprises the following: </t>
<dl newline="false" spacing="normal" indent="3" pn="section-5.2.5.1-4">
<dt pn="section-5.2.5.1-4.1">Reserved:</dt>
<dd pn="section-5.2.5.1-4.2">
<bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be set to zero on transmission and <bcp14>MUST</bcp14>
be ignored on receipt.</dd>
<dt pn="section-5.2.5.1-4.3">Count:</dt>
<dd pn="section-5.2.5.1-4.4">The Overflow-Count value (5 bits), encoded in
an integer. The value 0 is considered to be invalid. The number of
consecutive samples for which the overflow condition <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be met for
the LSP bandwidth is to be immediately adjusted to the current bandwidth
demand, bypassing the (up) Adjustment-Interval.</dd>
<dt pn="section-5.2.5.1-4.5">Overflow-Threshold:</dt>
<dd pn="section-5.2.5.1-4.6"> The absolute Overflow-Threshold
bandwidth value, encoded in IEEE floating point format (see <xref target="IEEE.754.1985" format="default" sectionFormat="of" derivedContent="IEEE.754.1985"/>) and expressed in bytes per
second. Refer to <xref target="RFC3471" sectionFormat="of" section="3.1.2" format="default" derivedLink="https://rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc3471#section-3.1.2" derivedContent="RFC3471"/> for a table of commonly used
values. If the difference between the current MaxAvgBw and the current
bandwidth reservation is greater than or equal to the threshold value,
the overflow condition is met.</dd>
</dl>
<t pn="section-5.2.5.1-5">
In the case in which an invalid value is present, the sub-TLV <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be ignored and the
previous value will be maintained.</t>
</section>
<section anchor="sect-5.2.5.2" numbered="true" toc="include" removeInRFC="false" pn="section-5.2.5.2">
<name slugifiedName="name-overflow-threshold-percenta">Overflow-Threshold-Percentage Sub-TLV</name>
<t pn="section-5.2.5.2-1">
The Overflow-Threshold-Percentage sub-TLV is used to decide if the
LSP bandwidth should be adjusted immediately.</t>
<figure anchor="Overflow-Threshold-Percentage-sub-TLV" align="left" suppress-title="false" pn="figure-14">
<name slugifiedName="name-overflow-threshold-percentag">Overflow-Threshold-Percentage Sub-TLV Format</name>
<artwork name="" type="" align="left" alt="" pn="section-5.2.5.2-2.1">
0 1 2 3
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Type=11 | Length=8 |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Percentage | Reserved | Count |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Minimum-Threshold |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+</artwork>
</figure>
<t pn="section-5.2.5.2-3">The Type is 11, the Length is 8 octets, and the value comprises the following:</t>
<dl newline="false" spacing="normal" indent="3" pn="section-5.2.5.2-4">
<dt pn="section-5.2.5.2-4.1">Percentage:</dt>
<dd pn="section-5.2.5.2-4.2">The Overflow-Threshold value (7 bits), encoded
in a percentage (an integer from 1 to 100). The value 0 is considered to
be invalid. If the percentage increase of the current MaxAvgBw from the
current bandwidth reservation is greater than or equal to the threshold
percentage, the overflow condition is met.</dd>
<dt pn="section-5.2.5.2-4.3">Reserved:</dt>
<dd pn="section-5.2.5.2-4.4">
<bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be set to zero on transmission and <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be
ignored on receipt.</dd>
<dt pn="section-5.2.5.2-4.5">Count:</dt>
<dd pn="section-5.2.5.2-4.6">The Overflow-Count value (5 bits), encoded in
an integer. The value 0 is considered to be invalid. The number of
consecutive samples for which the overflow condition <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be met for the
LSP bandwidth is to be immediately adjusted to the current bandwidth demand,
bypassing the (up) Adjustment-Interval.</dd>
<dt pn="section-5.2.5.2-4.7">Minimum-Threshold:</dt>
<dd pn="section-5.2.5.2-4.8">The absolute Minimum-Threshold
bandwidth value, encoded in IEEE floating point format (see <xref target="IEEE.754.1985" format="default" sectionFormat="of" derivedContent="IEEE.754.1985"/>) and expressed in bytes per second. The increase
of the LSP bandwidth <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be at or above the Minimum-Threshold
before the bandwidth adjustment is made.</dd>
</dl>
<t pn="section-5.2.5.2-5">
In the case in which an invalid value is present, the sub-TLV <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be ignored and the
previous value will be maintained.</t>
</section>
<section anchor="sect-5.2.5.3" numbered="true" toc="include" removeInRFC="false" pn="section-5.2.5.3">
<name slugifiedName="name-underflow-threshold-sub-tlv">Underflow-Threshold Sub-TLV</name>
<t pn="section-5.2.5.3-1">
The Underflow-Threshold sub-TLV is used to decide if the LSP
bandwidth should be adjusted immediately.</t>
<figure anchor="Underflow-Threshold-sub-TLV" align="left" suppress-title="false" pn="figure-15">
<name slugifiedName="name-underflow-threshold-sub-tlv-">Underflow-Threshold Sub-TLV Format</name>
<artwork name="" type="" align="left" alt="" pn="section-5.2.5.3-2.1">
0 1 2 3
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Type=12 | Length=8 |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Reserved | Count |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Underflow-Threshold |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+</artwork>
</figure>
<t pn="section-5.2.5.3-3">The Type is 12, the Length is 8 octets, and the value comprises the following: </t>
<dl newline="false" spacing="normal" indent="3" pn="section-5.2.5.3-4">
<dt pn="section-5.2.5.3-4.1">Reserved:</dt>
<dd pn="section-5.2.5.3-4.2">
<bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be set to zero on transmission and <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be
ignored on receipt.</dd>
<dt pn="section-5.2.5.3-4.3">Count:</dt>
<dd pn="section-5.2.5.3-4.4"> The Underflow-Count value (5 bits), encoded in an integer.
The value 0 is considered to be invalid. The number of
consecutive samples for which the underflow condition <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be met
for the LSP bandwidth is to be immediately adjusted to the current
bandwidth demand, bypassing the Down-Adjustment-Interval.</dd>
<dt pn="section-5.2.5.3-4.5">Underflow-Threshold:</dt>
<dd pn="section-5.2.5.3-4.6"> The absolute Underflow-Threshold
bandwidth value, encoded in IEEE floating point format (see <xref target="IEEE.754.1985" format="default" sectionFormat="of" derivedContent="IEEE.754.1985"/>) and expressed in bytes per second. Refer to
<xref target="RFC3471" sectionFormat="of" section="3.1.2" format="default" derivedLink="https://rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc3471#section-3.1.2" derivedContent="RFC3471"/> for a table of commonly used
values. If the difference between the current MaxAvgBw and the current
bandwidth reservation is greater than or equal to the threshold value,
the underflow condition is met.</dd>
</dl>
<t pn="section-5.2.5.3-5">
In the case in which an invalid value is present, the sub-TLV <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be ignored and the
previous value will be maintained.</t>
</section>
<section anchor="sect-5.2.5.4" numbered="true" toc="include" removeInRFC="false" pn="section-5.2.5.4">
<name slugifiedName="name-underflow-threshold-percent">Underflow-Threshold-Percentage Sub-TLV</name>
<t pn="section-5.2.5.4-1">
The Underflow-Threshold-Percentage sub-TLV is used to decide if the
LSP bandwidth should be adjusted immediately.</t>
<figure anchor="Underflow-Threshold-Percentage-sub-TLV" align="left" suppress-title="false" pn="figure-16">
<name slugifiedName="name-underflow-threshold-percenta">Underflow-Threshold-Percentage Sub-TLV Format</name>
<artwork name="" type="" align="left" alt="" pn="section-5.2.5.4-2.1">
0 1 2 3
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Type=13 | Length=8 |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Percentage | Reserved | Count |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Minimum-Threshold |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+</artwork>
</figure>
<t pn="section-5.2.5.4-3">The Type is 13, the Length is 8 octets, and the value comprises the following:</t>
<dl newline="false" spacing="normal" indent="3" pn="section-5.2.5.4-4">
<dt pn="section-5.2.5.4-4.1">Percentage:</dt>
<dd pn="section-5.2.5.4-4.2"> The Underflow-Threshold value (7 bits),
encoded in percentage (an integer from 1 to 100). The value 0 is
considered to be invalid. If the percentage decrease of the current
MaxAvgBw from the current bandwidth reservation is greater than or equal
to the threshold percentage, the underflow condition is met.</dd>
<dt pn="section-5.2.5.4-4.3">Reserved:</dt>
<dd pn="section-5.2.5.4-4.4">
<bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be set to zero on transmission and <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be
ignored on receipt.</dd>
<dt pn="section-5.2.5.4-4.5">Count:</dt>
<dd pn="section-5.2.5.4-4.6"> The Underflow-Count value (5 bits), encoded in an integer. The value 0 is considered to be invalid. The number of
consecutive samples for which the underflow condition <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be met for
the LSP bandwidth is to be immediately adjusted to the current bandwidth
demand, bypassing the Down-Adjustment-Interval.</dd>
<dt pn="section-5.2.5.4-4.7">Minimum-Threshold:</dt>
<dd pn="section-5.2.5.4-4.8"> The absolute Minimum-Threshold
bandwidth value, encoded in IEEE floating point format (see <xref target="IEEE.754.1985" format="default" sectionFormat="of" derivedContent="IEEE.754.1985"/>) and expressed in bytes per second. The decrease
of the LSP bandwidth <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be at or above the Minimum-Threshold
before the bandwidth adjustment is made.</dd>
</dl>
<t pn="section-5.2.5.4-5">
In the case in which an invalid value is present, the sub-TLV <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be ignored and the
previous value will be maintained.</t>
</section>
</section>
</section>
<section anchor="sect-5.3" numbered="true" toc="include" removeInRFC="false" pn="section-5.3">
<name slugifiedName="name-bandwidth-object">BANDWIDTH Object</name>
<t pn="section-5.3-1">
As per <xref target="RFC5440" format="default" sectionFormat="of" derivedContent="RFC5440"/>, the BANDWIDTH object (Object-Class value 5) is
defined with two Object-Type values as follows:</t>
<dl newline="false" spacing="normal" indent="3" pn="section-5.3-2">
<dt pn="section-5.3-2.1">Requested Bandwidth:</dt>
<dd pn="section-5.3-2.2">The BANDWIDTH Object-Type value is
1.</dd>
<dt pn="section-5.3-2.3">Reoptimization Bandwidth:</dt>
<dd pn="section-5.3-2.4">The bandwidth of an existing TE
LSP for which a reoptimization is requested. The BANDWIDTH Object-Type
value is 2.</dd>
</dl>
<t pn="section-5.3-3">
The PCC reports the calculated bandwidth to be adjusted (MaxAvgBw) to
the stateful PCE using the existing 'Requested Bandwidth' with the BANDWIDTH Object-Type as 1. The reporting of the 'reoptimization
bandwidth' with BANDWIDTH Object-Type as 2 is not required as the
stateful PCE is aware of the existing LSP bandwidth.</t>
</section>
<section anchor="sect-5.4" numbered="true" toc="include" removeInRFC="false" pn="section-5.4">
<name slugifiedName="name-the-pcinitiate-message">The PCInitiate Message</name>
<t pn="section-5.4-1">
A PCInitiate message is a PCEP message sent by a PCE to a PCC to
trigger LSP instantiation or deletion <xref target="RFC8281" format="default" sectionFormat="of" derivedContent="RFC8281"/>.</t>
<t pn="section-5.4-2">
For the PCE-initiated LSP with the auto-bandwidth feature enabled,
AUTO-BANDWIDTH-ATTRIBUTES TLV <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be included in the LSPA object with the
PCInitiate message.</t>
<t pn="section-5.4-3">
The Routing Backus-Naur Form (RBNF) definition of the PCInitiate
message <xref target="RFC8281" format="default" sectionFormat="of" derivedContent="RFC8281"/> is unchanged by this document.</t>
</section>
<section anchor="sect-5.5" numbered="true" toc="include" removeInRFC="false" pn="section-5.5">
<name slugifiedName="name-the-pcupd-message">The PCUpd Message</name>
<t pn="section-5.5-1">
A PCUpd message is a PCEP message sent by a PCE to a PCC to update
the LSP parameters <xref target="RFC8231" format="default" sectionFormat="of" derivedContent="RFC8231"/>.</t>
<t pn="section-5.5-2">
For PCE-initiated LSPs with the auto-bandwidth feature enabled,
the AUTO-BANDWIDTH-ATTRIBUTES TLV <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be included in the LSPA object with the
PCUpd message. The PCE can send this TLV to direct the PCC to change the
auto-bandwidth parameters.</t>
<t pn="section-5.5-3">
The RBNF definition of the PCUpd message <xref target="RFC8231" format="default" sectionFormat="of" derivedContent="RFC8231"/> is unchanged by
this document.</t>
</section>
<section anchor="sect-5.6" numbered="true" toc="include" removeInRFC="false" pn="section-5.6">
<name slugifiedName="name-the-pcrpt-message">The PCRpt Message</name>
<t pn="section-5.6-1">
The PCRpt message <xref target="RFC8231" format="default" sectionFormat="of" derivedContent="RFC8231"/> is a PCEP message sent by a PCC to a PCE
to report the status of one or more LSPs.</t>
<t pn="section-5.6-2">
For PCE-initiated LSPs <xref target="RFC8281" format="default" sectionFormat="of" derivedContent="RFC8281"/>, the PCC creates the LSP using the
attributes communicated by the PCE and the local values for
the unspecified parameters. After the successful instantiation of
the LSP, the PCC automatically delegates the LSP to the PCE and generates
a PCRpt message to provide the status report for the LSP.</t>
<t pn="section-5.6-3">
For both PCE-initiated and PCC-initiated LSPs, when the LSP is
delegated to a PCE for the very first time as well as after the
successful delegation, the BANDWIDTH object of type 1 is used to
specify the requested bandwidth in the PCRpt message.</t>
<t pn="section-5.6-4">
The RBNF definition of the PCRpt message <xref target="RFC8231" format="default" sectionFormat="of" derivedContent="RFC8231"/> is unchanged by
this document.</t>
</section>
<section anchor="sect-5.7" numbered="true" toc="include" removeInRFC="false" pn="section-5.7">
<name slugifiedName="name-the-pcntf-message">The PCNtf Message</name>
<t pn="section-5.7-1">
As per <xref target="RFC5440" format="default" sectionFormat="of" derivedContent="RFC5440"/>, the PCEP Notification message (PCNtf) can be sent
by a PCEP speaker to notify its peer of a specific event.</t>
<t pn="section-5.7-2">
A PCEP speaker (PCE or PCC) <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> notify its PCEP peer (PCC or PCE)
when it is in an overwhelmed state due to the auto-bandwidth feature.
An implementation needs to make an attempt to send this notification
(when overwhelmed by auto-bandwidth adjustments) unless sending this
notification would only serve to increase the load further. Note that
when the notification is not received, the PCEP speaker would continue
to request bandwidth adjustments even when they cannot be handled
in a timely fashion.</t>
<t pn="section-5.7-3">
Upon receipt of an auto-bandwidth overwhelm notification, the peer
<bcp14>SHOULD NOT</bcp14> send any PCEP messages related to auto-bandwidth
adjustment. If a PCEP message related to auto-bandwidth adjustment
is received while in an overwhelmed state, it <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be ignored.</t>
<ul spacing="normal" bare="false" empty="false" pn="section-5.7-4">
<li pn="section-5.7-4.1">When a PCEP speaker is overwhelmed, it
<bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> notify its peer by sending a PCNtf message with
Notification-type = 5 (Auto-Bandwidth Overwhelm State) and
Notification-value = 1 (Entering Auto-Bandwidth Overwhelm State).
Optionally, an OVERLOADED-DURATION TLV <xref target="RFC5440" format="default" sectionFormat="of" derivedContent="RFC5440"/> <bcp14>MAY</bcp14> be
included to specify the time period during which no further PCEP
messages related to auto-bandwidth adjustment should be sent.</li>
<li pn="section-5.7-4.2">When the PCEP speaker is no longer in the overwhelm state and is
available to process the auto-bandwidth adjustments, it <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14>
notify its peers by sending a PCNtf message with Notification-type
= 5 (Auto-Bandwidth Overwhelm State) and Notification-value = 2
(Clearing Auto-Bandwidth Overwhelm State). A PCEP speaker <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14>
send such notification to all peers if a Notification message
(Notification-type = 5, Notification-value = 1) was sent earlier.
This message is not sent if an OVERLOADED-DURATION TLV was included and the PCEP
speakers wishes for the peer to wait for the expiration of that
period of time before receiving further PCEP messages related to
auto-bandwidth adjustment.</li>
</ul>
<t pn="section-5.7-5">
When the auto-bandwidth feature is deployed, a PCE can send this
notification to a PCC when it reports frequent auto-bandwidth
adjustments. If a PCC is overwhelmed with resignaling, it can also
notify the PCE to not adjust the LSP bandwidth while in the overwhelm
state.</t>
<t pn="section-5.7-6">
Some dampening notification procedure (as per <xref target="RFC5440" format="default" sectionFormat="of" derivedContent="RFC5440"/>) to avoid
oscillations of the overwhelm state is <bcp14>RECOMMENDED</bcp14>. On receipt of an
auto-bandwidth overwhelm notification from the PCE, a PCC should
consider the impact on the entire network. Moving the delegations of
auto-bandwidth-enabled LSPs to another PCE could cause further
overloading.</t>
</section>
</section>
<section anchor="sect-6" numbered="true" toc="include" removeInRFC="false" pn="section-6">
<name slugifiedName="name-manageability-consideration">Manageability Considerations</name>
<section anchor="sect-6.1" numbered="true" toc="include" removeInRFC="false" pn="section-6.1">
<name slugifiedName="name-control-of-function-and-pol">Control of Function and Policy</name>
<t pn="section-6.1-1">
The auto-bandwidth feature <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> be controlled on a per-LSP
basis (at
the PCC
(head-end of the LSP) or PCE), and the values for auto-bandwidth
parameters, e.g., Sample-Interval, Adjustment-Interval (up/down),
Minimum-Bandwidth, Maximum-Bandwidth, and Adjustment-Threshold (up/down),
<bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> be configurable by an operator.</t>
<t pn="section-6.1-2">
The Maximum-Bandwidth (and Minimum-Bandwidth) should be set to an
acceptable limit to avoid having an impact on the rest of the MPLS-TE domain.</t>
<t pn="section-6.1-3">
The operator should make sure that the Overflow-Threshold is greater
than or at least equal to the Up-Adjustment-Threshold. And similarly,
it is important to ensure that the Underflow-Threshold is greater than or at least
equal to the Down-Adjustment-Threshold.</t>
</section>
<section anchor="sect-6.2" numbered="true" toc="include" removeInRFC="false" pn="section-6.2">
<name slugifiedName="name-information-and-data-models">Information and Data Models</name>
<t pn="section-6.2-1">
A MIB module for gathering operational information about the PCEP is
defined in <xref target="RFC7420" format="default" sectionFormat="of" derivedContent="RFC7420"/>. Additionally, the YANG module defined in
<xref target="I-D.ietf-pce-pcep-yang" format="default" sectionFormat="of" derivedContent="PCE-PCEP-YANG"/> provides both configuration of PCEP as
well as operational management. These could be enhanced to provide
controls and indicators for support of the auto-bandwidth feature.
Support for various configuration knobs as well as counters of
messages sent/received containing the TLVs defined in this document
could be added.</t>
</section>
<section anchor="sect-6.3" numbered="true" toc="include" removeInRFC="false" pn="section-6.3">
<name slugifiedName="name-liveness-detection-and-moni">Liveness Detection and Monitoring</name>
<t pn="section-6.3-1">
The mechanisms defined in this document do not imply any new liveness
detection and monitoring requirements in addition to those already
listed in <xref target="RFC5440" format="default" sectionFormat="of" derivedContent="RFC5440"/>.</t>
</section>
<section anchor="sect-6.4" numbered="true" toc="include" removeInRFC="false" pn="section-6.4">
<name slugifiedName="name-verifying-correct-operation">Verifying Correct Operations</name>
<t pn="section-6.4-1">
The mechanisms defined in this document do not imply any new
operation verification requirements in addition to those already
listed in <xref target="RFC5440" format="default" sectionFormat="of" derivedContent="RFC5440"/>.</t>
<t pn="section-6.4-2">
In the case in which an invalid value is present, the sub-TLV would get ignored and the
previous value will be maintained. In such a case, the implementation
<bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> log the event.</t>
</section>
<section anchor="sect-6.5" numbered="true" toc="include" removeInRFC="false" pn="section-6.5">
<name slugifiedName="name-requirements-for-other-prot">Requirements for Other Protocols</name>
<t pn="section-6.5-1">
The mechanisms defined in this document do not add any new
requirements for other protocols.</t>
</section>
<section anchor="sect-6.6" numbered="true" toc="include" removeInRFC="false" pn="section-6.6">
<name slugifiedName="name-impact-on-network-operation">Impact on Network Operations</name>
<t pn="section-6.6-1">
In order to avoid any unacceptable impact on network operations, an
implementation <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> allow a limit to be placed on the number of
LSPs that can be enabled with the auto-bandwidth feature. For each LSP
enabled with the auto-bandwidth feature, there is an extra load on the PCC, as
it needs to monitor the traffic and report the calculated bandwidth
to be adjusted to the PCE. The PCE further recomputes paths based on
the requested bandwidth and updates the path to the PCC, which, in
turn, triggers the resignaling of the path. All these steps add
extra load and churn in the network; thus, the operator needs to take
due care while enabling these features on a number of LSPs.</t>
<t pn="section-6.6-2">
An implementation <bcp14>MAY</bcp14> allow a limit to be placed on the rate of
auto-bandwidth-related messages sent by a PCEP speaker and received by a
peer. An implementation <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> also allow notifications to
be sent when a PCEP speaker is overwhelmed or when the rate of messages
reaches a threshold.</t>
<t pn="section-6.6-3">
Due care is required by the operator if a Sample-Interval value
significantly smaller than the default (5 minutes) is used, as small
Sample-Interval values, e.g., 1 minute or less, could cause
undesirable interactions with transport protocols. These undesirable
interactions result from providing insufficient time for transport
protocol reactions to a prior bandwidth adjustment to settle down
before Bandwidth-Samples are taken for the next bandwidth adjustment.</t>
</section>
</section>
<section anchor="sect-7" numbered="true" toc="include" removeInRFC="false" pn="section-7">
<name slugifiedName="name-security-considerations">Security Considerations</name>
<t pn="section-7-1"> This
document defines AUTO-BANDWIDTH-CAPABILITY TLV and
AUTO-BANDWIDTH-ATTRIBUTES sub-TLVs, which do not add any substantial
new security concerns beyond those already discussed in <xref target="RFC8231" format="default" sectionFormat="of" derivedContent="RFC8231"/> and <xref target="RFC8281" format="default" sectionFormat="of" derivedContent="RFC8281"/> for stateful PCE
operations. As per <xref target="RFC8231" format="default" sectionFormat="of" derivedContent="RFC8231"/>, it is <bcp14>RECOMMENDED</bcp14> that
these PCEP extensions only be activated on authenticated and encrypted
sessions across PCEs and PCCs belonging to the same administrative
authority, using Transport Layer Security (TLS) <xref target="RFC8253" format="default" sectionFormat="of" derivedContent="RFC8253"/>, as per the recommendations and best current
practices in BCP 195 <xref target="RFC7525" format="default" sectionFormat="of" derivedContent="RFC7525"/> (unless explicitly set
aside in <xref target="RFC8253" format="default" sectionFormat="of" derivedContent="RFC8253"/>).</t>
<t pn="section-7-2">
Incorrect auto-bandwidth parameters in the AUTO-BANDWIDTH-ATTRIBUTES
sub-TLVs could have an adverse effect on the LSP as well as on the
network.</t>
</section>
<section anchor="sect-8" numbered="true" toc="include" removeInRFC="false" pn="section-8">
<name slugifiedName="name-iana-considerations">IANA Considerations</name>
<section anchor="sect-8.1" numbered="true" toc="include" removeInRFC="false" pn="section-8.1">
<name slugifiedName="name-pcep-tlv-type-indicators">PCEP TLV Type Indicators</name>
<t pn="section-8.1-1">
This document defines the following new PCEP TLVs; IANA has made
the following allocations from the "PCEP TLV Type Indicators"
subregistry of the "Path Computation Element Protocol (PCEP) Numbers" registry as follows:</t>
<table anchor="pcep-tlv" align="left" pn="table-3">
<name slugifiedName="name-pcep-tlv-type-indicators-2">PCEP TLV Type Indicators</name>
<thead>
<tr>
<th align="left" colspan="1" rowspan="1">Value</th>
<th align="left" colspan="1" rowspan="1">Description</th>
<th align="left" colspan="1" rowspan="1">Reference</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td align="left" colspan="1" rowspan="1">36</td>
<td align="left" colspan="1" rowspan="1">AUTO-BANDWIDTH-CAPABILITY</td>
<td align="left" colspan="1" rowspan="1">[RFC8733]</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" colspan="1" rowspan="1">37</td>
<td align="left" colspan="1" rowspan="1">AUTO-BANDWIDTH-ATTRIBUTES</td>
<td align="left" colspan="1" rowspan="1">[RFC8733]</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</section>
<section anchor="sect-8.2" numbered="true" toc="include" removeInRFC="false" pn="section-8.2">
<name slugifiedName="name-auto-bandwidth-capability-tlv">AUTO-BANDWIDTH-CAPABILITY TLV Flag Field</name>
<t pn="section-8.2-1">
IANA has created a subregistry to manage the Flag field
of the AUTO-BANDWIDTH-CAPABILITY TLV within the "Path Computation Element Protocol (PCEP) Numbers" registry.</t>
<t pn="section-8.2-2">
New bit numbers are to be assigned by Standards Action <xref target="RFC8126" format="default" sectionFormat="of" derivedContent="RFC8126"/>.
Each bit should be tracked with the following qualities:</t>
<ul spacing="normal" bare="false" empty="false" pn="section-8.2-3">
<li pn="section-8.2-3.1">Bit number (counting from bit 0 as the most significant bit)</li>
<li pn="section-8.2-3.2">Capability description</li>
<li pn="section-8.2-3.3">Defining RFC</li>
</ul>
<t pn="section-8.2-4">
The initial contents of the subregistry are empty, with all bits
marked unassigned.</t>
</section>
<section anchor="sect-8.3" numbered="true" toc="include" removeInRFC="false" pn="section-8.3">
<name slugifiedName="name-auto-bandwidth-attributes-s">AUTO-BANDWIDTH-ATTRIBUTES Sub-TLV</name>
<t pn="section-8.3-1">
This document specifies the AUTO-BANDWIDTH-ATTRIBUTES sub-TLVs. IANA
has created an "AUTO-BANDWIDTH-ATTRIBUTES Sub-TLV Types"
subregistry within the "Path Computation Element Protocol (PCEP) Numbers" registry to manage the type indicator space for sub-TLVs of
the AUTO-BANDWIDTH-ATTRIBUTES TLV. The valid range of values in the
registry is 0-65535. IANA has initialized the registry
with the following values. All other values in the registry should
be marked as "Unassigned".</t>
<t pn="section-8.3-2">
IANA has set the Registration Procedure for this registry
to read as follows:</t>
<table anchor="registration" align="left" pn="table-4">
<name slugifiedName="name-registration-procedure-for-">Registration Procedure for the "AUTO-BANDWIDTH-ATTRIBUTES Sub-TLV" Registry</name>
<thead>
<tr>
<th align="left" colspan="1" rowspan="1">Range</th>
<th align="left" colspan="1" rowspan="1">Registration Procedure</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td align="left" colspan="1" rowspan="1">0-65503</td>
<td align="left" colspan="1" rowspan="1">IETF Review</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" colspan="1" rowspan="1">65504-65535</td>
<td align="left" colspan="1" rowspan="1">Experimental Use</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<t pn="section-8.3-4">
This document defines the following types:
</t>
<table anchor="registry" align="left" pn="table-5">
<name slugifiedName="name-initial-contents-of-the-aut">Initial Contents of the "AUTO-BANDWIDTH-ATTRIBUTES Sub-TLV" Registry</name>
<thead>
<tr>
<th align="left" colspan="1" rowspan="1">Type</th>
<th align="left" colspan="1" rowspan="1">Name</th>
<th align="left" colspan="1" rowspan="1">Reference</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td align="left" colspan="1" rowspan="1">0</td>
<td align="left" colspan="1" rowspan="1">Reserved</td>
<td align="left" colspan="1" rowspan="1">[RFC8733]</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" colspan="1" rowspan="1">1</td>
<td align="left" colspan="1" rowspan="1">Sample-Interval </td>
<td align="left" colspan="1" rowspan="1">[RFC8733]</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" colspan="1" rowspan="1">2</td>
<td align="left" colspan="1" rowspan="1">Adjustment-Interval </td>
<td align="left" colspan="1" rowspan="1">[RFC8733]</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" colspan="1" rowspan="1">3</td>
<td align="left" colspan="1" rowspan="1">Down-Adjustment-Interval</td>
<td align="left" colspan="1" rowspan="1">[RFC8733]</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" colspan="1" rowspan="1">4</td>
<td align="left" colspan="1" rowspan="1">Adjustment-Threshold </td>
<td align="left" colspan="1" rowspan="1">[RFC8733]</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" colspan="1" rowspan="1">5</td>
<td align="left" colspan="1" rowspan="1">Adjustment-Threshold-Percentage </td>
<td align="left" colspan="1" rowspan="1">[RFC8733]</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" colspan="1" rowspan="1">6</td>
<td align="left" colspan="1" rowspan="1">Down-Adjustment-Threshold </td>
<td align="left" colspan="1" rowspan="1">[RFC8733]</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" colspan="1" rowspan="1">7</td>
<td align="left" colspan="1" rowspan="1">Down-Adjustment-Threshold-Percentage </td>
<td align="left" colspan="1" rowspan="1">[RFC8733]</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" colspan="1" rowspan="1">8</td>
<td align="left" colspan="1" rowspan="1">Minimum-Bandwidth </td>
<td align="left" colspan="1" rowspan="1">[RFC8733]</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" colspan="1" rowspan="1">9</td>
<td align="left" colspan="1" rowspan="1">Maximum-Bandwidth </td>
<td align="left" colspan="1" rowspan="1">[RFC8733]</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" colspan="1" rowspan="1">10</td>
<td align="left" colspan="1" rowspan="1">Overflow-Threshold </td>
<td align="left" colspan="1" rowspan="1">[RFC8733]</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" colspan="1" rowspan="1">11</td>
<td align="left" colspan="1" rowspan="1">Overflow-Threshold-Percentage </td>
<td align="left" colspan="1" rowspan="1">[RFC8733]</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" colspan="1" rowspan="1">12</td>
<td align="left" colspan="1" rowspan="1">Underflow-Threshold </td>
<td align="left" colspan="1" rowspan="1">[RFC8733]</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" colspan="1" rowspan="1">13</td>
<td align="left" colspan="1" rowspan="1">Underflow-Threshold-Percentage</td>
<td align="left" colspan="1" rowspan="1">[RFC8733]</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" colspan="1" rowspan="1">14-65503</td>
<td align="left" colspan="1" rowspan="1">Unassigned</td>
<td align="left" colspan="1" rowspan="1">[RFC8733]</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</section>
<section anchor="sect-8.4" numbered="true" toc="include" removeInRFC="false" pn="section-8.4">
<name slugifiedName="name-error-object">Error Object</name>
<t pn="section-8.4-1"> This document
defines a new Error-value for PCErr message of Error-Type 19 (Invalid
Operation) <xref target="RFC8231" format="default" sectionFormat="of" derivedContent="RFC8231"/>. IANA has allocated
a new Error-value within the "PCEP-ERROR Object Error Types and Values"
subregistry of the "Path Computation Element Protocol (PCEP) Numbers" registry as follows:</t>
<table anchor="PCEP-registry" align="left" pn="table-6">
<name slugifiedName="name-addition-to-the-pcep-error-">Addition to the "PCEP-ERROR Object Error Types and
Values" Registry</name>
<thead>
<tr>
<th align="left" colspan="1" rowspan="1">Error-Type</th>
<th align="left" colspan="1" rowspan="1">Meaning</th>
<th align="left" colspan="1" rowspan="1">Error-value</th>
<th align="left" colspan="1" rowspan="1">Reference</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td align="left" colspan="1" rowspan="1">19</td>
<td align="left" colspan="1" rowspan="1">Invalid Operation</td>
<td align="left" colspan="1" rowspan="1">14: Auto-Bandwidth capability was not
advertised</td>
<td align="left" colspan="1" rowspan="1">[RFC8733]</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</section>
<section anchor="sect-8.5" numbered="true" toc="include" removeInRFC="false" pn="section-8.5">
<name slugifiedName="name-notification-object">Notification Object</name>
<t pn="section-8.5-1">
IANA has allocated a new Notification-type and Notification-values within the "Notification Object" subregistry of the "Path
Computation Element Protocol (PCEP)
Numbers" registry as follows:</t>
<table anchor="notification-object" align="left" pn="table-7">
<name slugifiedName="name-additions-to-the-notificati">Additions to the "Notification Object" Registry</name>
<thead>
<tr>
<th align="left" colspan="1" rowspan="1">Notification-type</th>
<th align="left" colspan="1" rowspan="1">Name</th>
<th align="left" colspan="1" rowspan="1">Notification-value</th>
<th align="left" colspan="1" rowspan="1">Reference</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td align="left" colspan="1" rowspan="1">5</td>
<td align="left" colspan="1" rowspan="1">Auto-Bandwidth Overwhelm State</td>
<td align="left" colspan="1" rowspan="1">0: Unassigned</td>
<td align="left" colspan="1" rowspan="1">[RFC8733]</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" colspan="1" rowspan="1"/>
<td align="left" colspan="1" rowspan="1"/>
<td align="left" colspan="1" rowspan="1">1: Entering Auto-Bandwidth Overwhelm State</td>
<td align="left" colspan="1" rowspan="1">[RFC8733]</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" colspan="1" rowspan="1"/>
<td align="left" colspan="1" rowspan="1"/>
<td align="left" colspan="1" rowspan="1">2: Clearing Auto-Bandwidth Overwhelm State</td>
<td align="left" colspan="1" rowspan="1">[RFC8733]</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</section>
</section>
</middle>
<back>
<displayreference target="I-D.ietf-pce-pcep-yang" to="PCE-PCEP-YANG"/>
<references pn="section-9">
<name slugifiedName="name-references">References</name>
<references pn="section-9.1">
<name slugifiedName="name-normative-references">Normative References</name>
<reference anchor="IEEE.754.1985" quoteTitle="true" target="https://doi.org/10.1109/IEEESTD.1985.82928" derivedAnchor="IEEE.754.1985">
<front>
<title>Standard for Binary Floating-Point Arithmetic</title>
<seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.1109/IEEESTD.1985.82928"/>
<seriesInfo name="IEEE" value="Standard 754"/>
<author>
<organization showOnFrontPage="true">IEEE</organization>
</author>
<date month="October" year="1985"/>
</front>
</reference>
<reference anchor="RFC2119" target="https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2119" quoteTitle="true" derivedAnchor="RFC2119">
<front>
<title>Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels</title>
<author initials="S." surname="Bradner" fullname="S. Bradner">
<organization showOnFrontPage="true"/>
</author>
<date year="1997" month="March"/>
<abstract>
<t>In many standards track documents several words are used to signify the requirements in the specification. These words are often capitalized. This document defines these words as they should be interpreted in IETF documents. This document specifies an Internet Best Current Practices for the Internet Community, and requests discussion and suggestions for improvements.</t>
</abstract>
</front>
<seriesInfo name="BCP" value="14"/>
<seriesInfo name="RFC" value="2119"/>
<seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.17487/RFC2119"/>
</reference>
<reference anchor="RFC5440" target="https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5440" quoteTitle="true" derivedAnchor="RFC5440">
<front>
<title>Path Computation Element (PCE) Communication Protocol (PCEP)</title>
<author initials="JP." surname="Vasseur" fullname="JP. Vasseur" role="editor">
<organization showOnFrontPage="true"/>
</author>
<author initials="JL." surname="Le Roux" fullname="JL. Le Roux" role="editor">
<organization showOnFrontPage="true"/>
</author>
<date year="2009" month="March"/>
<abstract>
<t>This document specifies the Path Computation Element (PCE) Communication Protocol (PCEP) for communications between a Path Computation Client (PCC) and a PCE, or between two PCEs. Such interactions include path computation requests and path computation replies as well as notifications of specific states related to the use of a PCE in the context of Multiprotocol Label Switching (MPLS) and Generalized MPLS (GMPLS) Traffic Engineering. PCEP is designed to be flexible and extensible so as to easily allow for the addition of further messages and objects, should further requirements be expressed in the future. [STANDARDS-TRACK]</t>
</abstract>
</front>
<seriesInfo name="RFC" value="5440"/>
<seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.17487/RFC5440"/>
</reference>
<reference anchor="RFC7525" target="https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7525" quoteTitle="true" derivedAnchor="RFC7525">
<front>
<title>Recommendations for Secure Use of Transport Layer Security (TLS) and Datagram Transport Layer Security (DTLS)</title>
<author initials="Y." surname="Sheffer" fullname="Y. Sheffer">
<organization showOnFrontPage="true"/>
</author>
<author initials="R." surname="Holz" fullname="R. Holz">
<organization showOnFrontPage="true"/>
</author>
<author initials="P." surname="Saint-Andre" fullname="P. Saint-Andre">
<organization showOnFrontPage="true"/>
</author>
<date year="2015" month="May"/>
<abstract>
<t>Transport Layer Security (TLS) and Datagram Transport Layer Security (DTLS) are widely used to protect data exchanged over application protocols such as HTTP, SMTP, IMAP, POP, SIP, and XMPP. Over the last few years, several serious attacks on TLS have emerged, including attacks on its most commonly used cipher suites and their modes of operation. This document provides recommendations for improving the security of deployed services that use TLS and DTLS. The recommendations are applicable to the majority of use cases.</t>
</abstract>
</front>
<seriesInfo name="BCP" value="195"/>
<seriesInfo name="RFC" value="7525"/>
<seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.17487/RFC7525"/>
</reference>
<reference anchor="RFC8126" target="https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8126" quoteTitle="true" derivedAnchor="RFC8126">
<front>
<title>Guidelines for Writing an IANA Considerations Section in RFCs</title>
<author initials="M." surname="Cotton" fullname="M. Cotton">
<organization showOnFrontPage="true"/>
</author>
<author initials="B." surname="Leiba" fullname="B. Leiba">
<organization showOnFrontPage="true"/>
</author>
<author initials="T." surname="Narten" fullname="T. Narten">
<organization showOnFrontPage="true"/>
</author>
<date year="2017" month="June"/>
<abstract>
<t>Many protocols make use of points of extensibility that use constants to identify various protocol parameters. To ensure that the values in these fields do not have conflicting uses and to promote interoperability, their allocations are often coordinated by a central record keeper. For IETF protocols, that role is filled by the Internet Assigned Numbers Authority (IANA).</t>
<t>To make assignments in a given registry prudently, guidance describing the conditions under which new values should be assigned, as well as when and how modifications to existing values can be made, is needed. This document defines a framework for the documentation of these guidelines by specification authors, in order to assure that the provided guidance for the IANA Considerations is clear and addresses the various issues that are likely in the operation of a registry.</t>
<t>This is the third edition of this document; it obsoletes RFC 5226.</t>
</abstract>
</front>
<seriesInfo name="BCP" value="26"/>
<seriesInfo name="RFC" value="8126"/>
<seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.17487/RFC8126"/>
</reference>
<reference anchor="RFC8174" target="https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8174" quoteTitle="true" derivedAnchor="RFC8174">
<front>
<title>Ambiguity of Uppercase vs Lowercase in RFC 2119 Key Words</title>
<author initials="B." surname="Leiba" fullname="B. Leiba">
<organization showOnFrontPage="true"/>
</author>
<date year="2017" month="May"/>
<abstract>
<t>RFC 2119 specifies common key words that may be used in protocol specifications. This document aims to reduce the ambiguity by clarifying that only UPPERCASE usage of the key words have the defined special meanings.</t>
</abstract>
</front>
<seriesInfo name="BCP" value="14"/>
<seriesInfo name="RFC" value="8174"/>
<seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.17487/RFC8174"/>
</reference>
<reference anchor="RFC8231" target="https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8231" quoteTitle="true" derivedAnchor="RFC8231">
<front>
<title>Path Computation Element Communication Protocol (PCEP) Extensions for Stateful PCE</title>
<author initials="E." surname="Crabbe" fullname="E. Crabbe">
<organization showOnFrontPage="true"/>
</author>
<author initials="I." surname="Minei" fullname="I. Minei">
<organization showOnFrontPage="true"/>
</author>
<author initials="J." surname="Medved" fullname="J. Medved">
<organization showOnFrontPage="true"/>
</author>
<author initials="R." surname="Varga" fullname="R. Varga">
<organization showOnFrontPage="true"/>
</author>
<date year="2017" month="September"/>
<abstract>
<t>The Path Computation Element Communication Protocol (PCEP) provides mechanisms for Path Computation Elements (PCEs) to perform path computations in response to Path Computation Client (PCC) requests.</t>
<t>Although PCEP explicitly makes no assumptions regarding the information available to the PCE, it also makes no provisions for PCE control of timing and sequence of path computations within and across PCEP sessions. This document describes a set of extensions to PCEP to enable stateful control of MPLS-TE and GMPLS Label Switched Paths (LSPs) via PCEP.</t>
</abstract>
</front>
<seriesInfo name="RFC" value="8231"/>
<seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.17487/RFC8231"/>
</reference>
<reference anchor="RFC8253" target="https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8253" quoteTitle="true" derivedAnchor="RFC8253">
<front>
<title>PCEPS: Usage of TLS to Provide a Secure Transport for the Path Computation Element Communication Protocol (PCEP)</title>
<author initials="D." surname="Lopez" fullname="D. Lopez">
<organization showOnFrontPage="true"/>
</author>
<author initials="O." surname="Gonzalez de Dios" fullname="O. Gonzalez de Dios">
<organization showOnFrontPage="true"/>
</author>
<author initials="Q." surname="Wu" fullname="Q. Wu">
<organization showOnFrontPage="true"/>
</author>
<author initials="D." surname="Dhody" fullname="D. Dhody">
<organization showOnFrontPage="true"/>
</author>
<date year="2017" month="October"/>
<abstract>
<t>The Path Computation Element Communication Protocol (PCEP) defines the mechanisms for the communication between a Path Computation Client (PCC) and a Path Computation Element (PCE), or among PCEs. This document describes PCEPS -- the usage of Transport Layer Security (TLS) to provide a secure transport for PCEP. The additional security mechanisms are provided by the transport protocol supporting PCEP; therefore, they do not affect the flexibility and extensibility of PCEP.</t>
<t>This document updates RFC 5440 in regards to the PCEP initialization phase procedures.</t>
</abstract>
</front>
<seriesInfo name="RFC" value="8253"/>
<seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.17487/RFC8253"/>
</reference>
<reference anchor="RFC8281" target="https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8281" quoteTitle="true" derivedAnchor="RFC8281">
<front>
<title>Path Computation Element Communication Protocol (PCEP) Extensions for PCE-Initiated LSP Setup in a Stateful PCE Model</title>
<author initials="E." surname="Crabbe" fullname="E. Crabbe">
<organization showOnFrontPage="true"/>
</author>
<author initials="I." surname="Minei" fullname="I. Minei">
<organization showOnFrontPage="true"/>
</author>
<author initials="S." surname="Sivabalan" fullname="S. Sivabalan">
<organization showOnFrontPage="true"/>
</author>
<author initials="R." surname="Varga" fullname="R. Varga">
<organization showOnFrontPage="true"/>
</author>
<date year="2017" month="December"/>
<abstract>
<t>The Path Computation Element Communication Protocol (PCEP) provides mechanisms for Path Computation Elements (PCEs) to perform path computations in response to Path Computation Client (PCC) requests.</t>
<t>The extensions for stateful PCE provide active control of Multiprotocol Label Switching (MPLS) Traffic Engineering Label Switched Paths (TE LSPs) via PCEP, for a model where the PCC delegates control over one or more locally configured LSPs to the PCE. This document describes the creation and deletion of PCE-initiated LSPs under the stateful PCE model.</t>
</abstract>
</front>
<seriesInfo name="RFC" value="8281"/>
<seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.17487/RFC8281"/>
</reference>
</references>
<references pn="section-9.2">
<name slugifiedName="name-informative-references">Informative References</name>
<reference anchor="I-D.ietf-pce-pcep-yang" quoteTitle="true" target="https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-pce-pcep-yang-13" derivedAnchor="PCE-PCEP-YANG">
<front>
<title>A YANG Data Model for Path Computation Element Communications Protocol (PCEP)</title>
<author initials="D" surname="Dhody" fullname="Dhruv Dhody">
<organization showOnFrontPage="true"/>
</author>
<author initials="J" surname="Hardwick" fullname="Jonathan Hardwick">
<organization showOnFrontPage="true"/>
</author>
<author initials="V" surname="Beeram" fullname="Vishnu Beeram">
<organization showOnFrontPage="true"/>
</author>
<author initials="J" surname="Tantsura" fullname="Jeff Tantsura">
<organization showOnFrontPage="true"/>
</author>
<date month="October" day="31" year="2019"/>
<abstract>
<t>This document defines a YANG data model for the management of Path Computation Element communications Protocol (PCEP) for communications between a Path Computation Client (PCC) and a Path Computation Element (PCE), or between two PCEs. The data model includes configuration and state data.</t>
</abstract>
</front>
<seriesInfo name="Internet-Draft" value="draft-ietf-pce-pcep-yang-13"/>
<format type="TXT" target="http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-pce-pcep-yang-13.txt"/>
<refcontent>Work in Progress</refcontent>
</reference>
<reference anchor="RFC3209" target="https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc3209" quoteTitle="true" derivedAnchor="RFC3209">
<front>
<title>RSVP-TE: Extensions to RSVP for LSP Tunnels</title>
<author initials="D." surname="Awduche" fullname="D. Awduche">
<organization showOnFrontPage="true"/>
</author>
<author initials="L." surname="Berger" fullname="L. Berger">
<organization showOnFrontPage="true"/>
</author>
<author initials="D." surname="Gan" fullname="D. Gan">
<organization showOnFrontPage="true"/>
</author>
<author initials="T." surname="Li" fullname="T. Li">
<organization showOnFrontPage="true"/>
</author>
<author initials="V." surname="Srinivasan" fullname="V. Srinivasan">
<organization showOnFrontPage="true"/>
</author>
<author initials="G." surname="Swallow" fullname="G. Swallow">
<organization showOnFrontPage="true"/>
</author>
<date year="2001" month="December"/>
<abstract>
<t>This document describes the use of RSVP (Resource Reservation Protocol), including all the necessary extensions, to establish label-switched paths (LSPs) in MPLS (Multi-Protocol Label Switching). Since the flow along an LSP is completely identified by the label applied at the ingress node of the path, these paths may be treated as tunnels. A key application of LSP tunnels is traffic engineering with MPLS as specified in RFC 2702. [STANDARDS-TRACK]</t>
</abstract>
</front>
<seriesInfo name="RFC" value="3209"/>
<seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.17487/RFC3209"/>
</reference>
<reference anchor="RFC3471" target="https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc3471" quoteTitle="true" derivedAnchor="RFC3471">
<front>
<title>Generalized Multi-Protocol Label Switching (GMPLS) Signaling Functional Description</title>
<author initials="L." surname="Berger" fullname="L. Berger" role="editor">
<organization showOnFrontPage="true"/>
</author>
<date year="2003" month="January"/>
<abstract>
<t>This document describes extensions to Multi-Protocol Label Switching (MPLS) signaling required to support Generalized MPLS. Generalized MPLS extends the MPLS control plane to encompass time-division (e.g., Synchronous Optical Network and Synchronous Digital Hierarchy, SONET/SDH), wavelength (optical lambdas) and spatial switching (e.g., incoming port or fiber to outgoing port or fiber). This document presents a functional description of the extensions. Protocol specific formats and mechanisms, and technology specific details are specified in separate documents. [STANDARDS-TRACK]</t>
</abstract>
</front>
<seriesInfo name="RFC" value="3471"/>
<seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.17487/RFC3471"/>
</reference>
<reference anchor="RFC7420" target="https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7420" quoteTitle="true" derivedAnchor="RFC7420">
<front>
<title>Path Computation Element Communication Protocol (PCEP) Management Information Base (MIB) Module</title>
<author initials="A." surname="Koushik" fullname="A. Koushik">
<organization showOnFrontPage="true"/>
</author>
<author initials="E." surname="Stephan" fullname="E. Stephan">
<organization showOnFrontPage="true"/>
</author>
<author initials="Q." surname="Zhao" fullname="Q. Zhao">
<organization showOnFrontPage="true"/>
</author>
<author initials="D." surname="King" fullname="D. King">
<organization showOnFrontPage="true"/>
</author>
<author initials="J." surname="Hardwick" fullname="J. Hardwick">
<organization showOnFrontPage="true"/>
</author>
<date year="2014" month="December"/>
<abstract>
<t>This memo defines a portion of the Management Information Base (MIB) for use with network management protocols in the Internet community. In particular, it describes managed objects for modeling of the Path Computation Element Communication Protocol (PCEP) for communications between a Path Computation Client (PCC) and a Path Computation Element (PCE), or between two PCEs.</t>
</abstract>
</front>
<seriesInfo name="RFC" value="7420"/>
<seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.17487/RFC7420"/>
</reference>
<reference anchor="RFC8051" target="https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8051" quoteTitle="true" derivedAnchor="RFC8051">
<front>
<title>Applicability of a Stateful Path Computation Element (PCE)</title>
<author initials="X." surname="Zhang" fullname="X. Zhang" role="editor">
<organization showOnFrontPage="true"/>
</author>
<author initials="I." surname="Minei" fullname="I. Minei" role="editor">
<organization showOnFrontPage="true"/>
</author>
<date year="2017" month="January"/>
<abstract>
<t>A stateful Path Computation Element (PCE) maintains information about Label Switched Path (LSP) characteristics and resource usage within a network in order to provide traffic-engineering calculations for its associated Path Computation Clients (PCCs). This document describes general considerations for a stateful PCE deployment and examines its applicability and benefits, as well as its challenges and limitations, through a number of use cases. PCE Communication Protocol (PCEP) extensions required for stateful PCE usage are covered in separate documents.</t>
</abstract>
</front>
<seriesInfo name="RFC" value="8051"/>
<seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.17487/RFC8051"/>
</reference>
</references>
</references>
<section numbered="false" anchor="acknowledgments" toc="include" removeInRFC="false" pn="section-appendix.a">
<name slugifiedName="name-acknowledgments">Acknowledgments</name>
<t pn="section-appendix.a-1">
The authors would like to thank <contact fullname="Robert Varga"/>, <contact fullname="Venugopal Reddy"/>, <contact fullname="Reeja Paul"/>, <contact fullname="Sandeep Boina"/>, <contact fullname="Avantika"/>, <contact fullname="JP Vasseur"/>, <contact fullname="Himanshu Shah"/>, <contact fullname="Jonathan Hardwick"/>, and <contact fullname="Adrian Farrel"/> for their useful comments and suggestions.</t>
<t pn="section-appendix.a-2">
Thanks to <contact fullname="Daniel Franke"/>, <contact fullname="Joe Clarke"/>, <contact fullname="David Black"/>, and <contact fullname="Erik Kline"/> for
the directorate reviews.</t>
<t pn="section-appendix.a-3">
Thanks to <contact fullname="Mirja Kühlewind"/>, <contact fullname="Barry Leiba"/>, <contact fullname="Benjamin Kaduk"/>, and <contact fullname="Roman Danyliw"/> for the IESG review.</t>
</section>
<section numbered="false" anchor="contributors" toc="include" removeInRFC="false" pn="section-appendix.b">
<name slugifiedName="name-contributors">Contributors</name>
<contact fullname="He Zekun">
<organization showOnFrontPage="true">Tencent Holdings Ltd.</organization>
<address>
<postal>
<city>Shenzhen</city>
<country>China</country>
</postal>
<email>kinghe@tencent.com</email>
</address>
</contact>
<contact fullname="Xian Zhang">
<organization showOnFrontPage="true">Huawei Technologies</organization>
<address>
<postal>
<street>Research Area F3-1B</street>
<street>Huawei Industrial Base,</street>
<city>Shenzhen</city>
<code>518129</code>
<country>China</country>
</postal>
<phone>+86-755-28972645</phone>
<email>zhang.xian@huawei.com</email>
</address>
</contact>
<contact fullname="Young Lee">
<organization showOnFrontPage="true">Samsung</organization>
<address>
<postal>
</postal>
<email>younglee.tx@gmail.com</email>
</address>
</contact>
</section>
<section anchor="authors-addresses" numbered="false" removeInRFC="false" toc="include" pn="section-appendix.c">
<name slugifiedName="name-authors-addresses">Authors' Addresses</name>
<author fullname="Dhruv Dhody" initials="D." role="editor" surname="Dhody">
<organization showOnFrontPage="true">Huawei Technologies</organization>
<address>
<postal>
<street>Divyashree Techno Park, Whitefield</street>
<city>Bangalore</city>
<region>Karnataka</region>
<code>560066</code>
<country>India</country>
</postal>
<email>dhruv.ietf@gmail.com</email>
</address>
</author>
<author fullname="Rakesh Gandhi" initials="R." role="editor" surname="Gandhi">
<organization showOnFrontPage="true">Cisco Systems, Inc.</organization>
<address>
<postal>
<country>Canada</country>
</postal>
<email>rgandhi@cisco.com</email>
</address>
</author>
<author fullname="Udayasree Palle" initials="U." surname="Palle">
<organization showOnFrontPage="true">Individual Contributor</organization>
<address>
<email>udayasreereddy@gmail.com</email>
</address>
</author>
<author fullname="Ravi Singh" initials="R." surname="Singh">
<organization showOnFrontPage="true">Individual Contributor</organization>
<address>
<email>ravi.singh.ietf@gmail.com</email>
</address>
</author>
<author fullname="Luyuan Fang" initials="L." surname="Fang">
<organization showOnFrontPage="true">Expedia Group, Inc.</organization>
<address>
<postal>
<country>United States of America</country>
</postal>
<email>luyuanf@gmail.com</email>
</address>
</author>
</section>
</back>
</rfc>
|