1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
|
<pre>Network Working Group T. Wu
Request for Comments: 2944 Standford University
Category: Standards Track September 2000
<span class="h1">Telnet Authentication: SRP</span>
Status of this Memo
This document specifies an Internet standards track protocol for the
Internet community, and requests discussion and suggestions for
improvements. Please refer to the current edition of the "Internet
Official Protocol Standards" (STD 1) for the standardization state
and status of this protocol. Distribution of this memo is unlimited.
Copyright Notice
Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2000). All Rights Reserved.
Abstract
This document specifies an authentication scheme for the Telnet
protocol under the framework described in [<a href="./rfc2941" title=""Telnet Authentication Option"">RFC2941</a>], using the Secure
Remote Password Protocol (SRP) authentication mechanism. The
specific mechanism, SRP-SHA1, is described in [<a href="./rfc2945" title=""The SRP Authentication and Key Exchange System"">RFC2945</a>].
<span class="h2"><a class="selflink" id="section-1" href="#section-1">1</a>. Command Names and Codes</span>
Authentication Types
SRP 5
Suboption Commands
AUTH 0
REJECT 1
ACCEPT 2
CHALLENGE 3
RESPONSE 4
EXP 8
PARAMS 9
<span class="grey">Wu Standards Track [Page 1]</span></pre>
<hr class='noprint'/><!--NewPage--><pre class='newpage'><span id="page-2" ></span>
<span class="grey"><a href="./rfc2944">RFC 2944</a> Telnet Authentication: SRP September 2000</span>
<span class="h2"><a class="selflink" id="section-2" href="#section-2">2</a>. Command Meanings</span>
IAC SB AUTHENTICATION IS <authentication-type-pair> AUTH IAC SE
This command indicates that the client has supplied the
username and is ready to receive that user's field parameters.
There is no authentication information to be sent to the remote
side of the connection yet. This should only be sent after the
IAC SB AUTHENTICATION NAME command has been issued. If the
modifier byte (second byte of the authentication-type-pair)
has any bits other than AUTH_WHO_MASK or AUTH_HOW_MASK set,
both bytes are included in the session key hash described later.
This ensures that the authentication type pair was correctly
negotiated, while maintaining backward-compatibility with existing
software.
IAC SB AUTHENTICATION REPLY <authentication-type-pair> PARAMS <values
of modulus, generator, and salt> IAC SE
This command is used to pass the three parameter values used
in the exponentiation to the client. These values are often
called n, g, and s.
IAC SB AUTHENTICATION IS <authentication-type-pair> EXP <client's
exponential residue> IAC SE
This command is used to pass the client's exponential residue,
otherwise known as A, computed against the parameters exchanged
earlier.
IAC SB AUTHENTICATION REPLY <authentication-type-pair> CHALLENGE
<server's exponential residue> IAC SE
This command is used to pass the server's exponential residue,
computed against the same parameters. This quantity is actually
the sum of two residues, i.e. g^x + g^b. For details see [<a href="#ref-SRP" title=""The Secure Remote Password Protocol"">SRP</a>]
and [<a href="./rfc2945" title=""The SRP Authentication and Key Exchange System"">RFC2945</a>].
IAC SB AUTHENTICATION IS <authentication-type-pair> RESPONSE
<response from client> IAC SE
This command gives the server proof of the client's authenticity
with a 160-bit (20 byte) response.
<span class="grey">Wu Standards Track [Page 2]</span></pre>
<hr class='noprint'/><!--NewPage--><pre class='newpage'><span id="page-3" ></span>
<span class="grey"><a href="./rfc2944">RFC 2944</a> Telnet Authentication: SRP September 2000</span>
IAC SB AUTHENTICATION REPLY <authentication-type-pair> ACCEPT
<server's response> IAC SE
This command indicates that the authentication was successful.
The server will construct its own proof of authenticity and
include it as sub-option data.
IAC SB AUTHENTICATION REPLY <authentication-type-pair> REJECT
<optional reason for rejection> IAC SE
This command indicates that the authentication was not successful,
and if there is any more data in the sub-option, it is an ASCII
text message of the reason for the rejection.
For the PARAMS command, since three pieces of data are being
transmitted, each parameter is preceded by a 16-bit (two byte) length
specifier in network byte order. The EXP commands do not have a
count in front of the data because there is only one piece of data in
that suboption. The CHALLENGE, RESPONSE, and ACCEPT data also do not
have a count because they are all fixed in size.
<span class="h2"><a class="selflink" id="section-3" href="#section-3">3</a>. Implementation Rules</span>
Currently, only AUTH_CLIENT_TO_SERVER mode is supported. Although
the SRP protocol effectively performs implicit mutual authentication
as a result of the two-way proofs, only the AUTH_HOW_ONE_WAY
authentication mode is currently defined. The AUTH_HOW_MUTUAL
setting is being reserved for an explicit mutual-authentication
variant of the SRP protocol to be defined in future specifications.
All large number data sent in the arguments of the PARAMS and EXP
commands must be in network byte order, i.e. most significant byte
first. No padding is used.
The SRP-SHA1 mechanism, as described in [<a href="./rfc2945" title=""The SRP Authentication and Key Exchange System"">RFC2945</a>] generates a 40-byte
session key, which allows implementations to use different keys for
incoming and outgoing traffic, increasing the security of the
encrypted session. It is recommended that the Telnet ENCRYPT method,
if it is used, be able to take advantage of the longer session keys.
<span class="h2"><a class="selflink" id="section-4" href="#section-4">4</a>. Examples</span>
User "tjw" may wish to log in on machine "foo". The client would
send IAC SB AUTHENTICATION NAME "tjw" IAC SE IAC SB AUTHENTICATION IS
SRP AUTH IAC SE. The server would look up the field and salt
parameters for "tjw" from its password file and send them back to the
client. Client and server would then exchange exponential residues
and calculate their session keys (after the client prompted "tjw" for
<span class="grey">Wu Standards Track [Page 3]</span></pre>
<hr class='noprint'/><!--NewPage--><pre class='newpage'><span id="page-4" ></span>
<span class="grey"><a href="./rfc2944">RFC 2944</a> Telnet Authentication: SRP September 2000</span>
his password). Then, the client would send the server its proof that
it knows the session key. The server would either send back an
ACCEPT or a REJECT. If the server accepts authentication, it also
sends its own proof that it knows the session key to the client.
Client Server
IAC DO AUTHENTICATION
IAC WILL AUTHENTICATION
[ The server is now free to request authentication information.
]
IAC SB AUTHENTICATION SEND
SRP CLIENT|ONE_WAY|
ENCRYPT_USING_TELOPT
SRP CLIENT|ONE_WAY
IAC SE
[ The server has requested SRP authentication. It has indicated
a preference for ENCRYPT_USING_TELOPT, which requires the
Telnet ENCRYPT option to be negotiated once authentication
succeeds. If the client does not support this, the server
is willing to fall back to an encryption-optional mode.
The client will now respond with the name of the
user that it wants to log in as. ]
IAC SB AUTHENTICATION NAME
"tjw" IAC SE
IAC SB AUTHENTICATION IS
SRP CLIENT|ONE_WAY|ENCRYPT_USING_TELOPT AUTH
IAC SE
[ The server looks up the appropriate information for "tjw" and
sends back the parameters in a PARAMS command. The parameters
consist of the values N, g, and s, each preceded with a two-
byte size parameter. ]
IAC SB AUTHENTICATION REPLY
SRP CLIENT|ONE_WAY|
ENCRYPT_USING_TELOPT PARAMS
ss ss nn nn nn nn ...
ss ss gg gg gg gg ...
ss ss tt tt tt tt ...
IAC SE
<span class="grey">Wu Standards Track [Page 4]</span></pre>
<hr class='noprint'/><!--NewPage--><pre class='newpage'><span id="page-5" ></span>
<span class="grey"><a href="./rfc2944">RFC 2944</a> Telnet Authentication: SRP September 2000</span>
[ Both sides send their exponential residues. The client
sends its value A and the server sends its value B. In SRP,
the CHALLENGE message may be computed but not sent before
the EXP command. ]
IAC SB AUTHENTICATION IS
SRP CLIENT|ONE_WAY|ENCRYPT_USING_TELOPT EXP
aa aa aa aa aa aa aa aa ...
IAC SE
IAC SB AUTHENTICATION REPLY
SRP CLIENT|ONE_WAY|
ENCRYPT_USING_TELOPT CHALLENGE
bb bb bb bb bb bb bb bb ...
IAC SE
[ The client sends its response to the server. This is the
message M in the SRP protocol, which proves possession of
the session key by the client.
Since ENCRYPT_USING_TELOPT is specified, the two octets
of the authentication-type-pair are appended to the
session key K before the hash for M is computed. If
the client and server had agreed upon a mode without
the encryption flag set, nothing would be appended to K.
Both this message and the server's response are as long as
the output of the hash; the length is 20 bytes for SHA-1. ]
IAC SB AUTHENTICATION IS
SRP CLIENT|ONE_WAY|ENCRYPT_USING_TELOPT RESPONSE
xx xx xx xx xx xx xx xx ...
IAC SE
[ The server accepts the response and sends its own proof. ]
IAC SB AUTHENTICATION REPLY
SRP CLIENT|ONE_WAY|
ENCRYPT_USING_TELOPT ACCEPT
yy yy yy yy yy yy yy yy ...
IAC SE
<span class="grey">Wu Standards Track [Page 5]</span></pre>
<hr class='noprint'/><!--NewPage--><pre class='newpage'><span id="page-6" ></span>
<span class="grey"><a href="./rfc2944">RFC 2944</a> Telnet Authentication: SRP September 2000</span>
<span class="h2"><a class="selflink" id="section-5" href="#section-5">5</a>. Security Considerations</span>
The ability to negotiate a common authentication mechanism between
client and server is a feature of the authentication option that
should be used with caution. When the negotiation is performed, no
authentication has yet occurred. Therefore, each system has no way
of knowing whether or not it is talking to the system it intends. An
intruder could attempt to negotiate the use of an authentication
system which is either weak, or already compromised by the intruder.
Since SRP relies on the security of the underlying public-key
cryptosystem, the modulus "n" should be large enough to resist
brute-force attack. A length of at least 1024 bits is recommended,
and implementations should reject attempts to use moduli that are
shorter than 512 bits, or attempts to use invalid moduli and
generator parameters (non-safe-prime "n" or non-primitive "g").
<span class="h2"><a class="selflink" id="section-6" href="#section-6">6</a>. IANA Considerations</span>
The authentication type SRP and its associated suboption values are
registered with IANA. Any suboption values used to extend the
protocol as described in this document must be registered with IANA
before use. IANA is instructed not to issue new suboption values
without submission of documentation of their use.
<span class="h2"><a class="selflink" id="section-7" href="#section-7">7</a>. References</span>
[<a id="ref-RFC2941">RFC2941</a>] Ts'o, T. and J. Altman, "Telnet Authentication Option",
<a href="./rfc2941">RFC 2941</a>, September 2000.
[<a id="ref-SRP">SRP</a>] T. Wu, "The Secure Remote Password Protocol", In
Proceedings of the 1998 ISOC Network and Distributed
System Security Symposium, San Diego, CA, pp. 97-111.
[<a id="ref-RFC2945">RFC2945</a>] Wu, T., "The SRP Authentication and Key Exchange System",
<a href="./rfc2945">RFC 2945</a>, September 2000.
<span class="h2"><a class="selflink" id="section-8" href="#section-8">8</a>. Author's Address</span>
Thomas Wu
Stanford University
Stanford, CA 94305
EMail: tjw@cs.Stanford.EDU
<span class="grey">Wu Standards Track [Page 6]</span></pre>
<hr class='noprint'/><!--NewPage--><pre class='newpage'><span id="page-7" ></span>
<span class="grey"><a href="./rfc2944">RFC 2944</a> Telnet Authentication: SRP September 2000</span>
<span class="h2"><a class="selflink" id="section-9" href="#section-9">9</a>. Full Copyright Statement</span>
Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2000). All Rights Reserved.
This document and translations of it may be copied and furnished to
others, and derivative works that comment on or otherwise explain it
or assist in its implementation may be prepared, copied, published
and distributed, in whole or in part, without restriction of any
kind, provided that the above copyright notice and this paragraph are
included on all such copies and derivative works. However, this
document itself may not be modified in any way, such as by removing
the copyright notice or references to the Internet Society or other
Internet organizations, except as needed for the purpose of
developing Internet standards in which case the procedures for
copyrights defined in the Internet Standards process must be
followed, or as required to translate it into languages other than
English.
The limited permissions granted above are perpetual and will not be
revoked by the Internet Society or its successors or assigns.
This document and the information contained herein is provided on an
"AS IS" basis and THE INTERNET SOCIETY AND THE INTERNET ENGINEERING
TASK FORCE DISCLAIMS ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING
BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTY THAT THE USE OF THE INFORMATION
HEREIN WILL NOT INFRINGE ANY RIGHTS OR ANY IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF
MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
Acknowledgement
Funding for the RFC Editor function is currently provided by the
Internet Society.
Wu Standards Track [Page 7]
</pre>
|
