1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
|
<pre>Network Working Group R. Droms
Request for Comments: 3736 Cisco Systems
Category: Standards Track April 2004
<span class="h1">Stateless Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol (DHCP) Service for IPv6</span>
Status of this Memo
This document specifies an Internet standards track protocol for the
Internet community, and requests discussion and suggestions for
improvements. Please refer to the current edition of the "Internet
Official Protocol Standards" (STD 1) for the standardization state
and status of this protocol. Distribution of this memo is unlimited.
Copyright Notice
Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2004). All Rights Reserved.
Abstract
Stateless Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol service for IPv6
(DHCPv6) is used by nodes to obtain configuration information, such
as the addresses of DNS recursive name servers, that does not require
the maintenance of any dynamic state for individual clients. A node
that uses stateless DHCP must have obtained its IPv6 addresses
through some other mechanism, typically stateless address
autoconfiguration. This document explains which parts of <a href="./rfc3315">RFC 3315</a>
must be implemented in each of the different kinds of DHCP agents so
that agent can support stateless DHCP.
<span class="h2"><a class="selflink" id="section-1" href="#section-1">1</a>. Introduction</span>
Nodes that have obtained IPv6 addresses through some other mechanism,
such as stateless address autoconfiguration [<a href="#ref-6" title=""IPv6 Stateless Address Autoconfiguration"">6</a>] or manual
configuration, can use stateless DHCP to obtain other configuration
information such as a list of DNS recursive name servers or SIP
servers. A stateless DHCP server provides only configuration
information to nodes and does not perform any address assignment.
Such a server is called "stateless" because it need not maintain any
dynamic state for individual clients.
While the DHCP specification [<a href="#ref-1" title=""Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol for IPv6 (DHCPv6)"">1</a>] defines more than 10 protocol
messages and 20 options, only a subset of those messages and options
are required for stateless DHCP service. This document explains
which messages and options defined in <a href="./rfc3315">RFC 3315</a> are required for
stateless DHCP service. The intended use of the document is to guide
<span class="grey">Droms Standards Track [Page 1]</span></pre>
<hr class='noprint'/><!--NewPage--><pre class='newpage'><span id="page-2" ></span>
<span class="grey"><a href="./rfc3736">RFC 3736</a> Stateless DHCP Service for IPv6 April 2004</span>
the interoperable implementation of clients and servers that use
stateless DHCP service.
The operation of relay agents is the same for stateless and stateful
DHCP service. The operation of relay agents is described in the DHCP
specification.
<a href="#section-4">Section 4</a> of this document lists the sections of the DHCP document
that an implementor should read for an overview of the DHCP
specification and the basic requirements of a DHCP service. <a href="#section-5">Section</a>
<a href="#section-5">5</a> lists the specific messages and options that are specifically
required for stateless DHCP service. <a href="#section-6">Section 6</a> describes how
stateless and stateful DHCP servers interact to provide service to
clients that require address assignment and clients that require only
stateless service.
<span class="h2"><a class="selflink" id="section-2" href="#section-2">2</a>. Terminology</span>
Throughout this document, "DHCP" refers to DHCP for IPv6.
This document uses the terminology defined in <a href="./rfc2460">RFC 2460</a> [<a href="#ref-2" title=""Internet Protocol, Version 6 (IPv6) Specification"">2</a>], the DHCP
specification [<a href="#ref-1" title=""Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol for IPv6 (DHCPv6)"">1</a>], and the DHCP DNS configuration options
specification [<a href="#ref-3" title=""DNS Configuration options for Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol for IPv6 (DHCPv6)"">3</a>].
"Stateless DHCP" refers to the use of DHCP to provide configuration
information to clients that does not require the server to maintain
dynamic state about the DHCP clients.
<span class="h2"><a class="selflink" id="section-3" href="#section-3">3</a>. Overview</span>
This document assumes that a node using stateless DHCP configuration
is not using DHCP for address assignment, and that a node has
determined at least a link-local address as described in <a href="./rfc2461#section-5.3">section 5.3
of RFC 2461</a> [<a href="#ref-4" title=""Neighbor Discovery for IP Version 6 (IPv6)"">4</a>].
To obtain configuration parameters through stateless DHCP, a node
uses the DHCP Information-request message. DHCP servers respond to
the node's message with a Reply message that carries configuration
parameters for the node. The Reply message from the server can carry
configuration information, such as a list of DNS recursive name
servers [<a href="#ref-3" title=""DNS Configuration options for Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol for IPv6 (DHCPv6)"">3</a>] and SIP servers [<a href="#ref-5" title=""Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol (DHCPv6) Options for Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) Servers"">5</a>].
This document does not apply to the function of DHCP relay agents as
described in <a href="./rfc3315">RFC 3315</a>. A network element can provide both DHCP
server and DHCP relay service. For example, a network element can
provide stateless DHCP service to hosts requesting stateless DHCP
service, while relaying messages from hosts requesting address
assignment through DHCP to another DHCP server.
<span class="grey">Droms Standards Track [Page 2]</span></pre>
<hr class='noprint'/><!--NewPage--><pre class='newpage'><span id="page-3" ></span>
<span class="grey"><a href="./rfc3736">RFC 3736</a> Stateless DHCP Service for IPv6 April 2004</span>
<span class="h2"><a class="selflink" id="section-4" href="#section-4">4</a>. Basic Requirements for Implementation of DHCP</span>
Several sections of the DHCP specification provide background
information or define parts of the specification that are common to
all implementations:
1-4: give an introduction to DHCP and an overview of DHCP message
flows
5: defines constants used throughout the protocol specification
6, 7: illustrate the format of DHCP messages
8: describes the representation of Domain Names
9: defines the "DHCP unique identifier" (DUID)
13-16: describe DHCP message transmission, retransmission, and
validation
21: describes authentication for DHCP
<span class="h2"><a class="selflink" id="section-5" href="#section-5">5</a>. Implementation of Stateless DHCP</span>
The client indicates that it is requesting configuration information
by sending an Information-request message that includes an Option
Request option specifying the options that it wishes to receive from
the DHCP server. For example, if the client is attempting to obtain
a list of DNS recursive name servers, it identifies the DNS Recursive
Name Server option in the Information-request message. The server
determines the appropriate configuration parameters for the client
based on its configuration policies and responds with a Reply message
containing the requested parameters. In this example, the server
would respond with DNS configuration parameters.
As described in <a href="./rfc3315#section-18.1.5">section 18.1.5 of RFC 3315</a>, a node may include a
Client Identifier option in the Information-request message to
identify itself to a server, because the server administrator may
want to customize the server's response to each node, based on the
node's identity.
<a href="./rfc3315">RFC 3315</a> does not define any mechanisms through which the time at
which a host uses an Information-request message to obtain updated
configuration parameters can be controlled. The DHC WG has
undertaken the development of such a mechanism or mechanisms which
will be published as Standards-track RFC(s).
<span class="grey">Droms Standards Track [Page 3]</span></pre>
<hr class='noprint'/><!--NewPage--><pre class='newpage'><span id="page-4" ></span>
<span class="grey"><a href="./rfc3736">RFC 3736</a> Stateless DHCP Service for IPv6 April 2004</span>
<a href="./rfc3315">RFC 3315</a> also does not provide any guidance about when a host might
use an Information-request message to obtain updated configuration
parameters when the host has moved to a new link. The DHC WG is
reviewing a related document, "Detection of Network Attachment (DNA)
in IPv4" [<a href="#ref-8" title=""Detection of Network Attachment (DNA) in IPv4"">8</a>], which describes how a host using IPv4 can determine
when to use DHCPv4. Either the DHC WG or a WG formed from the DNA
BOF will undertake development of a similar document for IPv6.
<span class="h3"><a class="selflink" id="section-5.1" href="#section-5.1">5.1</a>. Messages Required for Stateless DHCP Service</span>
Clients and servers implement the following messages for stateless
DHCP service; the section numbers in this list refer to the DHCP
specification:
Information-request: sent by a DHCP client to a server to request
configuration parameters (sections <a href="#section-18.1.5">18.1.5</a> and
18.2.5)
Reply: sent by a DHCP server to a client containing
configuration parameters (sections <a href="#section-18.2.6">18.2.6</a> and
18.2.8)
In addition, servers and relay agents implement the following
messages for stateless DHCP service; the section numbers in this list
refer to the DHCP specification:
Relay-forward: sent by a DHCP relay agent to carry the client message
to a server (<a href="#section-15.13">section 15.13</a>)
Relay-reply: sent by a DHCP server to carry a response message to
the relay agent (<a href="#section-15.14">section 15.14</a>)
<span class="h3"><a class="selflink" id="section-5.2" href="#section-5.2">5.2</a>. Options Required for Stateless DHCP Service</span>
Clients and servers implement the following options for stateless
DHCP service; the section numbers in this list refer to the DHCP
specification:
Option Request: specifies the configuration information that the
client is requesting from the server (<a href="#section-22.7">section</a>
<a href="#section-22.7">22.7</a>)
Status Code: used to indicate completion status or other status
information (<a href="#section-22.13">section 22.13</a>)
Server Identifier: used to identify the server responding to a client
request (<a href="#section-22.3">section 22.3</a>)
<span class="grey">Droms Standards Track [Page 4]</span></pre>
<hr class='noprint'/><!--NewPage--><pre class='newpage'><span id="page-5" ></span>
<span class="grey"><a href="./rfc3736">RFC 3736</a> Stateless DHCP Service for IPv6 April 2004</span>
Servers and relay agents implement the following options for
stateless DHCP service; the section numbers in this list refer to the
DHCP specification:
Client message: sent by a DHCP relay agent in a Relay-forward message
to carry the client message to a server (<a href="#section-20">section 20</a>)
Server message: sent by a DHCP server in a Relay-reply message to
carry a response message to the relay agent (<a href="#section-20">section</a>
<a href="#section-20">20</a>)
Interface-ID: sent by the DHCP relay agent and returned by the
server to identify the interface to be used when
forwarding a message to the client (<a href="#section-22.18">section 22.18</a>)
<span class="h3"><a class="selflink" id="section-5.3" href="#section-5.3">5.3</a>. Options Used for Configuration Information</span>
Clients and servers use the following options to pass configuration
information to clients; note that other options for configuration
information may be specified in future Internet Standards:
DNS Recursive Name Servers: specifies the DNS recursive name servers
[<a href="#ref-7" title=""Domain names - concepts and facilities"">7</a>] the client uses for name resolution;
see "DNS Configuration options for
DHCPv6" [<a href="#ref-3" title=""DNS Configuration options for Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol for IPv6 (DHCPv6)"">3</a>]
DNS search list: specifies the domain names to be searched
during name resolution; see "DNS
Configuration options for DHCPv6" [<a href="#ref-3" title=""DNS Configuration options for Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol for IPv6 (DHCPv6)"">3</a>]
SIP Servers: specifies the SIP servers the client uses
to obtain a list of domain names of IPv6
addresses that can be mapped to one or
more SIP outbound proxy servers [<a href="#ref-5" title=""Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol (DHCPv6) Options for Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) Servers"">5</a>]
<span class="h3"><a class="selflink" id="section-5.4" href="#section-5.4">5.4</a>. Other Options Used in Stateless DHCP</span>
Clients and servers may implement the following options for stateless
DHCP service; the section numbers in this list refer to the DHCP
specification:
Preference: sent by a DHCP server to indicate the preference
level for the server (<a href="#section-22.8">section 22.8</a>)
Elapsed time: sent by a DHCP client to indicate the time since the
client began the DHCP configuration process (<a href="#section-22.9">section</a>
<a href="#section-22.9">22.9</a>)
<span class="grey">Droms Standards Track [Page 5]</span></pre>
<hr class='noprint'/><!--NewPage--><pre class='newpage'><span id="page-6" ></span>
<span class="grey"><a href="./rfc3736">RFC 3736</a> Stateless DHCP Service for IPv6 April 2004</span>
User Class: sent by a DHCP client to give additional information
to the server for selecting configuration parameters
for the client (<a href="#section-22.15">section 22.15</a>)
Vendor Class: sent by a DHCP client to give additional information
about the client vendor and hardware to the server
for selecting configuration parameters for the client
(<a href="#section-22.16">section 22.16</a>)
Vendor-specific Information: used to pass information to clients in
options defined by vendors (<a href="#section-22.17">section</a>
<a href="#section-22.17">22.17</a>)
Client Identifier: sent by a DHCP client to identify itself (<a href="#section-22.2">section</a>
<a href="#section-22.2">22.2</a>). Clients are not required to send this
option; servers send the option back if included
in a message from a client
Authentication: used to provide authentication of DHCP messages
(<a href="#section-21">section 21</a>)
<span class="h2"><a class="selflink" id="section-6" href="#section-6">6</a>. Interaction with DHCP for Address Assignment</span>
In some networks, there may be both clients that are using stateless
address autoconfiguration and DHCP for DNS configuration and clients
that are using DHCP for stateful address configuration. Depending on
the deployment and configuration of relay agents, DHCP servers that
are intended only for stateless configuration may receive messages
from clients that are performing stateful address configuration.
A DHCP server that is only able to provide stateless configuration
information through an Information-request/Reply message exchange
discards any other DHCP messages it receives. Specifically, the
server discards any messages other than Information-Request or
Relay-forward it receives, and the server does not participate in any
stateful address configuration message exchanges. If there are other
DHCP servers that are configured to provide stateful address
assignment, one of those servers will provide the address assignment.
<span class="h2"><a class="selflink" id="section-7" href="#section-7">7</a>. Security Considerations</span>
Stateless DHCP service is a proper subset of the DHCP service
described in the DHCP specification, <a href="./rfc3315">RFC 3315</a> [<a href="#ref-1" title=""Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol for IPv6 (DHCPv6)"">1</a>]. Therefore,
stateless DHCP service introduces no additional security
considerations beyond those discussed in sections <a href="#section-21">21</a>, <a href="#section-22.11">22.11</a>, and <a href="#section-23">23</a>
of the DHCP specification [<a href="#ref-1" title=""Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol for IPv6 (DHCPv6)"">1</a>].
<span class="grey">Droms Standards Track [Page 6]</span></pre>
<hr class='noprint'/><!--NewPage--><pre class='newpage'><span id="page-7" ></span>
<span class="grey"><a href="./rfc3736">RFC 3736</a> Stateless DHCP Service for IPv6 April 2004</span>
Configuration information provided to a node through stateless DHCP
service may be used to mount spoofing, man-in-the-middle, denial-of-
service, and other attacks. These attacks are described in more
detail in the specifications for each of the options that carry
configuration information. Authenticated DHCP, as described in
sections <a href="#section-21">21</a> and <a href="#section-22.11">22.11</a> of the DHCP specification [<a href="#ref-1" title=""Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol for IPv6 (DHCPv6)"">1</a>], can be used to
avoid attacks mounted through the stateless DHCP service.
<span class="h2"><a class="selflink" id="section-8" href="#section-8">8</a>. Acknowledgments</span>
Jim Bound, Ted Lemon, and Bernie Volz reviewed this document and
contributed editorial suggestions. Thanks to Peter Barany, Tim
Chown, Christian Huitema, Tatuya Jinmei, Pekka Savola, and Juha
Wiljakka for their review and comments.
<span class="h2"><a class="selflink" id="section-9" href="#section-9">9</a>. References</span>
<span class="h3"><a class="selflink" id="section-9.1" href="#section-9.1">9.1</a>. Normative References</span>
[<a id="ref-1">1</a>] Droms, R., Ed., Bound, J., Volz, B., Lemon, T., Perkins, C. and
M. Carney, "Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol for IPv6
(DHCPv6)", <a href="./rfc3315">RFC 3315</a>, July 2003.
[<a id="ref-2">2</a>] Deering, S. and R. Hinden, "Internet Protocol, Version 6 (IPv6)
Specification", <a href="./rfc2460">RFC 2460</a>, December 1998.
<span class="h3"><a class="selflink" id="section-9.2" href="#section-9.2">9.2</a>. Informative References</span>
[<a id="ref-3">3</a>] Droms, R., Ed., "DNS Configuration options for Dynamic Host
Configuration Protocol for IPv6 (DHCPv6)", <a href="./rfc3646">RFC 3646</a>, December
2003.
[<a id="ref-4">4</a>] Narten, T., Nordmark, E. and W. Simpson, "Neighbor Discovery for
IP Version 6 (IPv6)", <a href="./rfc2461">RFC 2461</a>, December 1998.
[<a id="ref-5">5</a>] Schulzrinne, H. and B. Volz, "Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol
(DHCPv6) Options for Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) Servers",
<a href="./rfc3319">RFC 3319</a>, July 2003.
[<a id="ref-6">6</a>] Thomson, S. and T. Narten, "IPv6 Stateless Address
Autoconfiguration", <a href="./rfc2462">RFC 2462</a>, December 1998.
[<a id="ref-7">7</a>] Mockapetris, P., "Domain names - concepts and facilities", STD
13, <a href="./rfc1034">RFC 1034</a>, November 1987.
[<a id="ref-8">8</a>] Aboba, B., <a style="text-decoration: none" href='https://www.google.com/search?sitesearch=datatracker.ietf.org%2Fdoc%2Fhtml%2F&q=inurl:draft-+%22Detection+of+Network+Attachment+%28DNA%29+in+IPv4%22'>"Detection of Network Attachment (DNA) in IPv4"</a>, Work
in Progress.
<span class="grey">Droms Standards Track [Page 7]</span></pre>
<hr class='noprint'/><!--NewPage--><pre class='newpage'><span id="page-8" ></span>
<span class="grey"><a href="./rfc3736">RFC 3736</a> Stateless DHCP Service for IPv6 April 2004</span>
<span class="h2"><a class="selflink" id="section-10" href="#section-10">10</a>. Author's Address</span>
Ralph Droms
Cisco Systems
1414 Massachusetts Avenue
Boxborough, MA 01719
USA
Phone: +1 978 497 4733
EMail: rdroms@cisco.com
<span class="grey">Droms Standards Track [Page 8]</span></pre>
<hr class='noprint'/><!--NewPage--><pre class='newpage'><span id="page-9" ></span>
<span class="grey"><a href="./rfc3736">RFC 3736</a> Stateless DHCP Service for IPv6 April 2004</span>
<span class="h2"><a class="selflink" id="section-11" href="#section-11">11</a>. Full Copyright Statement</span>
Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2004). This document is subject
to the rights, licenses and restrictions contained in <a href="https://www.rfc-editor.org/bcp/bcp78">BCP 78</a> and
except as set forth therein, the authors retain all their rights.
This document and the information contained herein are provided on an
"AS IS" basis and THE CONTRIBUTOR, THE ORGANIZATION HE/SHE
REPRESENTS OR IS SPONSORED BY (IF ANY), THE INTERNET SOCIETY AND THE
INTERNET ENGINEERING TASK FORCE DISCLAIM ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR
IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTY THAT THE USE OF
THE INFORMATION HEREIN WILL NOT INFRINGE ANY RIGHTS OR ANY IMPLIED
WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
Intellectual Property
The IETF takes no position regarding the validity or scope of any
Intellectual Property Rights or other rights that might be claimed
to pertain to the implementation or use of the technology
described in this document or the extent to which any license
under such rights might or might not be available; nor does it
represent that it has made any independent effort to identify any
such rights. Information on the procedures with respect to
rights in RFC documents can be found in <a href="https://www.rfc-editor.org/bcp/bcp78">BCP 78</a> and <a href="https://www.rfc-editor.org/bcp/bcp79">BCP 79</a>.
Copies of IPR disclosures made to the IETF Secretariat and any
assurances of licenses to be made available, or the result of an
attempt made to obtain a general license or permission for the use
of such proprietary rights by implementers or users of this
specification can be obtained from the IETF on-line IPR repository
at <a href="http://www.ietf.org/ipr">http://www.ietf.org/ipr</a>.
The IETF invites any interested party to bring to its attention
any copyrights, patents or patent applications, or other
proprietary rights that may cover technology that may be required
to implement this standard. Please address the information to the
IETF at ietf-ipr@ietf.org.
Acknowledgement
Funding for the RFC Editor function is currently provided by the
Internet Society.
Droms Standards Track [Page 9]
</pre>
|
