1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501
|
<pre>Network Working Group W. Segmuller
Request for Comments: 5231 B. Leiba
Obsoletes: <a href="./rfc3431">3431</a> IBM T.J. Watson Research Center
Category: Standards Track January 2008
<span class="h1">Sieve Email Filtering: Relational Extension</span>
Status of This Memo
This document specifies an Internet standards track protocol for the
Internet community, and requests discussion and suggestions for
improvements. Please refer to the current edition of the "Internet
Official Protocol Standards" (STD 1) for the standardization state
and status of this protocol. Distribution of this memo is unlimited.
Abstract
This document describes the RELATIONAL extension to the Sieve mail
filtering language defined in <a href="./rfc3028">RFC 3028</a>. This extension extends
existing conditional tests in Sieve to allow relational operators.
In addition to testing their content, it also allows for testing of
the number of entities in header and envelope fields.
This document obsoletes <a href="./rfc3431">RFC 3431</a>.
Table of Contents
<a href="#section-1">1</a>. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . <a href="#page-2">2</a>
<a href="#section-2">2</a>. Conventions Used in This Document . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . <a href="#page-2">2</a>
<a href="#section-3">3</a>. Comparators . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . <a href="#page-2">2</a>
<a href="#section-4">4</a>. Match Types . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . <a href="#page-3">3</a>
<a href="#section-4.1">4.1</a>. Match Type VALUE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . <a href="#page-3">3</a>
<a href="#section-4.2">4.2</a>. Match Type COUNT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . <a href="#page-3">3</a>
<a href="#section-5">5</a>. Interaction with Other Sieve Actions . . . . . . . . . . . . . <a href="#page-4">4</a>
<a href="#section-6">6</a>. Example . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . <a href="#page-4">4</a>
<a href="#section-7">7</a>. Extended Example . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . <a href="#page-6">6</a>
<a href="#section-8">8</a>. Changes since <a href="./rfc3431">RFC 3431</a> . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . <a href="#page-6">6</a>
<a href="#section-9">9</a>. IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . <a href="#page-7">7</a>
<a href="#section-10">10</a>. Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . <a href="#page-7">7</a>
<a href="#section-11">11</a>. Normative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . <a href="#page-7">7</a>
<span class="grey">Segmuller & Leiba Standards Track [Page 1]</span></pre>
<hr class='noprint'/><!--NewPage--><pre class='newpage'><span id="page-2" ></span>
<span class="grey"><a href="./rfc5231">RFC 5231</a> Sieve: Relational Extension January 2008</span>
<span class="h2"><a class="selflink" id="section-1" href="#section-1">1</a>. Introduction</span>
The RELATIONAL extension to the Sieve mail filtering language [<a href="#ref-Sieve" title=""Sieve: An Email Filtering Language"">Sieve</a>]
provides relational operators on the address, envelope, and header
tests. This extension also provides a way of counting the entities
in a message header or address field.
With this extension, the Sieve script may now determine if a field is
greater than or less than a value instead of just equivalent. One
use is for the x-priority field: move messages with a priority
greater than 3 to the "work on later" folder. Mail could also be
sorted by the from address. Those userids that start with 'a'-'m' go
to one folder, and the rest go to another folder.
The Sieve script can also determine the number of fields in the
header, or the number of addresses in a recipient field, for example,
whether there are more than 5 addresses in the to and cc fields.
The capability string associated with the extension defined in this
document is "relational".
<span class="h2"><a class="selflink" id="section-2" href="#section-2">2</a>. Conventions Used in This Document</span>
The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
"SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this
document are to be interpreted as described in <a href="https://www.rfc-editor.org/bcp/bcp14">BCP 14</a>, <a href="./rfc2119">RFC 2119</a>.
Conventions for notations are as in [<a href="#ref-Sieve" title=""Sieve: An Email Filtering Language"">Sieve</a>] <a href="#section-1.1">section 1.1</a>, including
the use of [<a href="#ref-Kwds" title=""Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels"">Kwds</a>] and the use of [<a href="#ref-ABNF" title=""Augmented BNF for Syntax Specifications: ABNF"">ABNF</a>].
<span class="h2"><a class="selflink" id="section-3" href="#section-3">3</a>. Comparators</span>
This document does not define any comparators or exempt any
comparators from the require clause. Any comparator used must be
treated as defined in [<a href="#ref-Sieve" title=""Sieve: An Email Filtering Language"">Sieve</a>].
The "i;ascii-numeric" comparator, as defined in [<a href="./rfc4790" title=""Internet Application Protocol Collation Registry"">RFC4790</a>], MUST be
supported for any implementation of this extension. The comparator
"i;ascii-numeric" MUST support at least 32-bit unsigned integers.
Larger integers MAY be supported. Note: the "i;ascii-numeric"
comparator does not support negative numbers.
<span class="grey">Segmuller & Leiba Standards Track [Page 2]</span></pre>
<hr class='noprint'/><!--NewPage--><pre class='newpage'><span id="page-3" ></span>
<span class="grey"><a href="./rfc5231">RFC 5231</a> Sieve: Relational Extension January 2008</span>
<span class="h2"><a class="selflink" id="section-4" href="#section-4">4</a>. Match Types</span>
This document defines two new match types. They are the VALUE match
type and the COUNT match type.
The syntax is:
MATCH-TYPE =/ COUNT / VALUE
COUNT = ":count" relational-match
VALUE = ":value" relational-match
relational-match = DQUOTE
("gt" / "ge" / "lt" / "le" / "eq" / "ne") DQUOTE
; "gt" means "greater than", the C operator ">".
; "ge" means "greater than or equal", the C operator ">=".
; "lt" means "less than", the C operator "<".
; "le" means "less than or equal", the C operator "<=".
; "eq" means "equal to", the C operator "==".
; "ne" means "not equal to", the C operator "!=".
<span class="h3"><a class="selflink" id="section-4.1" href="#section-4.1">4.1</a>. Match Type VALUE</span>
The VALUE match type does a relational comparison between strings.
The VALUE match type may be used with any comparator that returns
sort information.
A value from the message is considered the left side of the relation.
A value from the test expression, the key-list for address, envelope,
and header tests, is the right side of the relation.
If there are multiple values on either side or both sides, the test
is considered true if any pair is true.
<span class="h3"><a class="selflink" id="section-4.2" href="#section-4.2">4.2</a>. Match Type COUNT</span>
The COUNT match type first determines the number of the specified
entities in the message and does a relational comparison of the
number of entities, as defined below, to the values specified in the
test expression.
The COUNT match type SHOULD only be used with numeric comparators.
The Address Test counts the number of addresses (the number of
"mailbox" elements, as defined in [<a href="./rfc2822" title=""Internet Message Format"">RFC2822</a>]) in the specified fields.
Group names are ignored, but the contained mailboxes are counted.
<span class="grey">Segmuller & Leiba Standards Track [Page 3]</span></pre>
<hr class='noprint'/><!--NewPage--><pre class='newpage'><span id="page-4" ></span>
<span class="grey"><a href="./rfc5231">RFC 5231</a> Sieve: Relational Extension January 2008</span>
The Envelope Test counts the number of addresses in the specified
envelope parts. The envelope "to" will always have only one entry,
which is the address of the user for whom the Sieve script is
running. Using this test, there is no way a Sieve script can
determine if the message was actually sent to someone else. The
envelope "from" will be 0 if the MAIL FROM is empty, or 1 if MAIL
FROM is not empty.
The Header Test counts the total number of instances of the specified
fields. This does not count individual addresses in the "to", "cc",
and other recipient fields.
In all cases, if more than one field name is specified, the counts
for all specified fields are added together to obtain the number for
comparison. Thus, specifying ["to", "cc"] in an address COUNT test
compares the total number of "to" and "cc" addresses; if separate
counts are desired, they must be done in two comparisons, perhaps
joined by "allof" or "anyof".
<span class="h2"><a class="selflink" id="section-5" href="#section-5">5</a>. Interaction with Other Sieve Actions</span>
This specification adds two match types. The VALUE match type only
works with comparators that return sort information. The COUNT match
type only makes sense with numeric comparators.
There is no interaction with any other Sieve operations, nor with any
known extensions. In particular, this specification has no effect on
implicit KEEP, nor on any explicit message actions.
<span class="h2"><a class="selflink" id="section-6" href="#section-6">6</a>. Example</span>
Using the message:
received: ...
received: ...
subject: example
to: foo@example.com, baz@example.com
cc: qux@example.com
The test:
address :count "ge" :comparator "i;ascii-numeric"
["to", "cc"] ["3"]
would evaluate to true, and the test
<span class="grey">Segmuller & Leiba Standards Track [Page 4]</span></pre>
<hr class='noprint'/><!--NewPage--><pre class='newpage'><span id="page-5" ></span>
<span class="grey"><a href="./rfc5231">RFC 5231</a> Sieve: Relational Extension January 2008</span>
anyof ( address :count "ge" :comparator "i;ascii-numeric"
["to"] ["3"],
address :count "ge" :comparator "i;ascii-numeric"
["cc"] ["3"] )
would evaluate to false.
To check the number of received fields in the header, the following
test may be used:
header :count "ge" :comparator "i;ascii-numeric"
["received"] ["3"]
This would evaluate to false. But
header :count "ge" :comparator "i;ascii-numeric"
["received", "subject"] ["3"]
would evaluate to true.
The test:
header :count "ge" :comparator "i;ascii-numeric"
["to", "cc"] ["3"]
will always evaluate to false on an <a href="./rfc2822">RFC 2822</a> compliant message
[<a href="./rfc2822" title=""Internet Message Format"">RFC2822</a>], since a message can have at most one "to" field and at
most one "cc" field. This test counts the number of fields, not the
number of addresses.
<span class="grey">Segmuller & Leiba Standards Track [Page 5]</span></pre>
<hr class='noprint'/><!--NewPage--><pre class='newpage'><span id="page-6" ></span>
<span class="grey"><a href="./rfc5231">RFC 5231</a> Sieve: Relational Extension January 2008</span>
<span class="h2"><a class="selflink" id="section-7" href="#section-7">7</a>. Extended Example</span>
require ["relational", "comparator-i;ascii-numeric", "fileinto"];
if header :value "lt" :comparator "i;ascii-numeric"
["x-priority"] ["3"]
{
fileinto "Priority";
}
elsif address :count "gt" :comparator "i;ascii-numeric"
["to"] ["5"]
{
# everything with more than 5 recipients in the "to" field
# is considered SPAM
fileinto "SPAM";
}
elsif address :value "gt" :all :comparator "i;ascii-casemap"
["from"] ["M"]
{
fileinto "From N-Z";
} else {
fileinto "From A-M";
}
if allof ( address :count "eq" :comparator "i;ascii-numeric"
["to", "cc"] ["1"] ,
address :all :comparator "i;ascii-casemap"
["to", "cc"] ["me@foo.example.com"] )
{
fileinto "Only me";
}
<span class="h2"><a class="selflink" id="section-8" href="#section-8">8</a>. Changes since <a href="./rfc3431">RFC 3431</a></span>
Apart from several minor editorial/wording changes, the following
list describes the notable changes to this specification since <a href="./rfc3431">RFC</a>
<a href="./rfc3431">3431</a>.
o Updated references, including changing the comparator reference
from the Application Configuration Access Protocol (ACAP) to the
"Internet Application Protocol Collation Registry" document
[<a href="./rfc4790" title=""Internet Application Protocol Collation Registry"">RFC4790</a>].
o Updated and corrected the examples.
<span class="grey">Segmuller & Leiba Standards Track [Page 6]</span></pre>
<hr class='noprint'/><!--NewPage--><pre class='newpage'><span id="page-7" ></span>
<span class="grey"><a href="./rfc5231">RFC 5231</a> Sieve: Relational Extension January 2008</span>
o Added definition comments to ABNF for "gt", "lt", etc.
o Clarified what <a href="./rfc2822">RFC 2822</a> elements are counted in the COUNT test.
o Removed the requirement to strip white space from header fields
before comparing; a more general version of this requirement has
been added to the Sieve base spec.
<span class="h2"><a class="selflink" id="section-9" href="#section-9">9</a>. IANA Considerations</span>
The following template specifies the IANA registration of the
relational Sieve extension specified in this document:
To: iana@iana.org
Subject: Registration of new Sieve extension
Capability name: relational
Description: Extends existing conditional tests in Sieve language
to allow relational operators
RFC number: <a href="./rfc5231">RFC 5231</a>
Contact address: The Sieve discussion list <ietf-mta-filters@imc.org>
<span class="h2"><a class="selflink" id="section-10" href="#section-10">10</a>. Security Considerations</span>
An implementation MUST ensure that the test for envelope "to" only
reflects the delivery to the current user. Using this test, it MUST
not be possible for a user to determine if this message was delivered
to someone else.
Additional security considerations are discussed in [<a href="#ref-Sieve" title=""Sieve: An Email Filtering Language"">Sieve</a>].
<span class="h2"><a class="selflink" id="section-11" href="#section-11">11</a>. Normative References</span>
[<a id="ref-ABNF">ABNF</a>] Crocker, D., Ed. and P. Overell, "Augmented BNF for Syntax
Specifications: ABNF", <a href="./rfc4234">RFC 4234</a>, October 2005.
[<a id="ref-Kwds">Kwds</a>] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate
Requirement Levels", <a href="./rfc2119">RFC 2119</a>, March 1997.
[<a id="ref-RFC2822">RFC2822</a>] Resnick, P., "Internet Message Format", <a href="./rfc2822">RFC 2822</a>,
April 2001.
[<a id="ref-RFC4790">RFC4790</a>] Newman, C., Duerst, M., and A. Gulbrandsen, "Internet
Application Protocol Collation Registry", <a href="./rfc4790">RFC 4790</a>,
March 2007.
[<a id="ref-Sieve">Sieve</a>] Guenther, P., Ed. and T. Showalter, Ed., "Sieve: An Email
Filtering Language", <a href="./rfc5228">RFC 5228</a>, January 2008.
<span class="grey">Segmuller & Leiba Standards Track [Page 7]</span></pre>
<hr class='noprint'/><!--NewPage--><pre class='newpage'><span id="page-8" ></span>
<span class="grey"><a href="./rfc5231">RFC 5231</a> Sieve: Relational Extension January 2008</span>
Authors' Addresses
Wolfgang Segmuller
IBM T.J. Watson Research Center
19 Skyline Drive
Hawthorne, NY 10532
US
Phone: +1 914 784 7408
EMail: werewolf@us.ibm.com
Barry Leiba
IBM T.J. Watson Research Center
19 Skyline Drive
Hawthorne, NY 10532
US
Phone: +1 914 784 7941
EMail: leiba@watson.ibm.com
<span class="grey">Segmuller & Leiba Standards Track [Page 8]</span></pre>
<hr class='noprint'/><!--NewPage--><pre class='newpage'><span id="page-9" ></span>
<span class="grey"><a href="./rfc5231">RFC 5231</a> Sieve: Relational Extension January 2008</span>
Full Copyright Statement
Copyright (C) The IETF Trust (2008).
This document is subject to the rights, licenses and restrictions
contained in <a href="https://www.rfc-editor.org/bcp/bcp78">BCP 78</a>, and except as set forth therein, the authors
retain all their rights.
This document and the information contained herein are provided on an
"AS IS" basis and THE CONTRIBUTOR, THE ORGANIZATION HE/SHE REPRESENTS
OR IS SPONSORED BY (IF ANY), THE INTERNET SOCIETY, THE IETF TRUST AND
THE INTERNET ENGINEERING TASK FORCE DISCLAIM ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS
OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTY THAT THE USE OF
THE INFORMATION HEREIN WILL NOT INFRINGE ANY RIGHTS OR ANY IMPLIED
WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
Intellectual Property
The IETF takes no position regarding the validity or scope of any
Intellectual Property Rights or other rights that might be claimed to
pertain to the implementation or use of the technology described in
this document or the extent to which any license under such rights
might or might not be available; nor does it represent that it has
made any independent effort to identify any such rights. Information
on the procedures with respect to rights in RFC documents can be
found in <a href="https://www.rfc-editor.org/bcp/bcp78">BCP 78</a> and <a href="https://www.rfc-editor.org/bcp/bcp79">BCP 79</a>.
Copies of IPR disclosures made to the IETF Secretariat and any
assurances of licenses to be made available, or the result of an
attempt made to obtain a general license or permission for the use of
such proprietary rights by implementers or users of this
specification can be obtained from the IETF on-line IPR repository at
<a href="http://www.ietf.org/ipr">http://www.ietf.org/ipr</a>.
The IETF invites any interested party to bring to its attention any
copyrights, patents or patent applications, or other proprietary
rights that may cover technology that may be required to implement
this standard. Please address the information to the IETF at
ietf-ipr@ietf.org.
Segmuller & Leiba Standards Track [Page 9]
</pre>
|