1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590 591 592 593 594 595 596 597 598 599 600 601 602 603 604 605 606 607 608 609 610 611 612 613 614 615 616 617 618 619 620 621 622 623 624 625 626 627 628 629 630 631 632 633 634 635 636 637 638 639 640 641 642 643 644 645 646 647 648 649 650 651 652 653 654 655 656 657 658 659 660 661 662 663 664 665 666 667 668 669 670 671 672 673 674 675 676 677 678 679 680 681 682 683 684 685 686 687 688 689 690 691 692 693 694 695 696 697 698 699 700 701 702 703 704 705 706 707 708 709 710 711 712 713 714 715 716 717 718 719 720 721 722 723 724 725 726 727 728 729 730 731 732 733 734 735 736 737 738 739 740 741 742 743 744 745 746 747 748 749 750 751 752 753 754 755 756 757 758 759 760 761 762 763 764 765 766 767 768 769 770 771 772 773 774 775 776 777 778 779 780 781 782 783 784 785 786 787 788 789 790 791 792 793 794 795 796 797 798 799 800 801 802 803 804 805 806 807 808 809 810 811 812 813 814 815 816 817 818 819 820 821 822 823 824 825 826 827 828 829 830 831 832 833 834 835 836 837 838 839 840 841 842 843 844 845 846 847 848 849 850 851 852 853 854 855 856 857 858 859 860 861 862 863 864 865 866 867 868 869 870 871 872 873 874 875 876 877 878 879 880 881 882 883 884 885 886 887 888 889 890 891 892 893 894 895 896 897 898 899 900 901 902 903 904 905 906 907 908 909 910 911 912 913 914 915 916 917 918 919 920 921 922 923 924 925 926 927 928 929 930 931 932 933 934 935 936 937 938 939 940 941 942 943 944 945 946 947 948 949 950 951 952 953 954 955 956 957 958 959 960 961 962 963 964 965 966 967 968 969 970 971 972 973 974 975 976 977 978 979 980 981 982 983 984 985 986 987 988 989 990 991 992 993 994 995 996 997 998 999 1000 1001 1002 1003 1004 1005 1006 1007 1008 1009 1010 1011 1012 1013 1014 1015 1016 1017 1018 1019 1020 1021 1022 1023 1024 1025 1026 1027 1028 1029 1030 1031 1032 1033 1034 1035 1036 1037 1038 1039 1040 1041 1042 1043 1044 1045 1046 1047 1048 1049 1050 1051 1052 1053 1054 1055 1056 1057 1058 1059 1060 1061 1062 1063 1064 1065 1066 1067 1068 1069 1070 1071 1072 1073 1074 1075 1076 1077 1078 1079 1080 1081 1082 1083 1084 1085 1086 1087 1088 1089 1090 1091 1092 1093 1094 1095 1096 1097 1098 1099 1100 1101 1102 1103 1104 1105 1106 1107 1108 1109 1110 1111 1112 1113 1114 1115 1116 1117 1118 1119 1120 1121 1122 1123 1124 1125 1126 1127 1128 1129 1130 1131 1132 1133 1134 1135 1136 1137 1138 1139 1140 1141 1142 1143 1144 1145 1146 1147 1148 1149 1150 1151 1152 1153 1154 1155 1156 1157 1158 1159 1160 1161 1162 1163 1164 1165 1166 1167 1168 1169 1170 1171 1172 1173 1174 1175 1176 1177 1178 1179 1180 1181 1182 1183 1184 1185 1186 1187 1188 1189 1190 1191 1192 1193 1194 1195 1196 1197 1198 1199 1200 1201 1202 1203 1204 1205 1206 1207 1208 1209 1210 1211 1212 1213 1214 1215 1216 1217 1218 1219 1220 1221 1222 1223 1224 1225 1226 1227 1228 1229 1230 1231 1232 1233 1234 1235 1236 1237 1238 1239 1240 1241 1242 1243 1244 1245 1246 1247 1248 1249 1250 1251 1252 1253 1254 1255 1256 1257 1258 1259 1260 1261 1262 1263 1264 1265 1266 1267 1268 1269 1270 1271 1272 1273 1274 1275 1276 1277 1278 1279 1280 1281 1282 1283 1284 1285
|
<pre>Network Working Group H. Schulzrinne
Request for Comments: 5244 Columbia U.
Updates: <a href="./rfc4733">4733</a> T. Taylor
Category: Standards Track Nortel
June 2008
<span class="h1">Definition of Events for Channel-Oriented Telephony Signalling</span>
Status of This Memo
This document specifies an Internet standards track protocol for the
Internet community, and requests discussion and suggestions for
improvements. Please refer to the current edition of the "Internet
Official Protocol Standards" (STD 1) for the standardization state
and status of this protocol. Distribution of this memo is unlimited.
Abstract
This memo updates <a href="./rfc4733">RFC 4733</a> to add event codes for telephony signals
used for channel-associated signalling when carried in the telephony
event RTP payload. It supersedes and adds to the original assignment
of event codes for this purpose in <a href="./rfc2833#section-3.14">Section 3.14 of RFC 2833</a>. As
documented in <a href="./rfc4733#appendix-A">Appendix A of RFC 4733</a>, some of the <a href="./rfc2833">RFC 2833</a> events
have been deprecated because their specification was ambiguous,
erroneous, or redundant. In fact, the degree of change from <a href="./rfc2833#section-3.14">Section</a>
<a href="./rfc2833#section-3.14">3.14 of RFC 2833</a> is such that implementations of the present document
will be fully backward compatible with <a href="./rfc2833">RFC 2833</a> implementations only
in the case of full ABCD-bit signalling. This document expands and
improves the coverage of signalling systems compared to <a href="./rfc2833">RFC 2833</a>.
<span class="grey">Schulzrinne & Taylor Standards Track [Page 1]</span></pre>
<hr class='noprint'/><!--NewPage--><pre class='newpage'><span id="page-2" ></span>
<span class="grey"><a href="./rfc5244">RFC 5244</a> Channel-Oriented Signalling Events June 2008</span>
Table of Contents
<a href="#section-1">1</a>. Introduction ....................................................<a href="#page-2">2</a>
<a href="#section-1.1">1.1</a>. Overview ...................................................<a href="#page-2">2</a>
<a href="#section-1.2">1.2</a>. Terminology ................................................<a href="#page-3">3</a>
<a href="#section-2">2</a>. Event Definitions ...............................................<a href="#page-4">4</a>
<a href="#section-2.1">2.1</a>. Signalling System No. 5 ....................................<a href="#page-6">6</a>
<a href="#section-2.1.1">2.1.1</a>. Signalling System No. 5 Line Signals ................<a href="#page-6">6</a>
<a href="#section-2.1.2">2.1.2</a>. Signalling System No. 5 Register Signals ............<a href="#page-7">7</a>
<a href="#section-2.2">2.2</a>. Signalling System R1 and North American MF .................<a href="#page-8">8</a>
<a href="#section-2.2.1">2.2.1</a>. Signalling System R1 Line Signals ...................<a href="#page-8">8</a>
<a href="#section-2.2.2">2.2.2</a>. Signalling System R1 Register Signals ...............<a href="#page-8">8</a>
<a href="#section-2.3">2.3</a>. Signalling System R2 ......................................<a href="#page-10">10</a>
<a href="#section-2.3.1">2.3.1</a>. Signalling System R2 Line Signals ..................<a href="#page-10">10</a>
<a href="#section-2.3.2">2.3.2</a>. Signalling System R2 Register Signals ..............<a href="#page-10">10</a>
<a href="#section-2.4">2.4</a>. ABCD Transitional Signalling for Digital Trunks ...........<a href="#page-12">12</a>
<a href="#section-2.5">2.5</a>. Continuity Tones ..........................................<a href="#page-14">14</a>
<a href="#section-2.6">2.6</a>. Trunk Unavailable Event ...................................<a href="#page-14">14</a>
<a href="#section-2.7">2.7</a>. Metering Pulse Event ......................................<a href="#page-15">15</a>
<a href="#section-3">3</a>. Congestion Considerations ......................................<a href="#page-15">15</a>
<a href="#section-4">4</a>. Security Considerations ........................................<a href="#page-16">16</a>
<a href="#section-5">5</a>. IANA Considerations ............................................<a href="#page-17">17</a>
<a href="#section-6">6</a>. Acknowledgements ...............................................<a href="#page-20">20</a>
<a href="#section-7">7</a>. References .....................................................<a href="#page-20">20</a>
<a href="#section-7.1">7.1</a>. Normative References ......................................<a href="#page-20">20</a>
<a href="#section-7.2">7.2</a>. Informative References ....................................<a href="#page-21">21</a>
<span class="h2"><a class="selflink" id="section-1" href="#section-1">1</a>. Introduction</span>
<span class="h3"><a class="selflink" id="section-1.1" href="#section-1.1">1.1</a>. Overview</span>
This document extends the set of telephony events defined within the
framework of <a href="./rfc4733">RFC 4733</a> [<a href="#ref-4" title=""RTP Payload for DTMF Digits, Telephony Tones, and Telephony Signals"">4</a>] to include signalling events that can
appear on a circuit in the telephone network. Most of these events
correspond to signals within one of several channel-associated
signalling systems still in use in the PSTN.
Trunks (or circuits) in the PSTN are the media paths between
telephone switches. A succession of protocols have been developed
using tones and electrical conditions on individual trunks to set up
telephone calls using them. The events defined in this document
support an application where such PSTN signalling is carried between
two gateways without being signalled in the IP network: the "RTP
trunk" application.
In the "RTP trunk" application, RTP is used to replace a normal
circuit-switched trunk between two nodes. This is particularly of
interest in a telephone network that is still mostly
circuit-switched. In this case, each end of the RTP trunk encodes
<span class="grey">Schulzrinne & Taylor Standards Track [Page 2]</span></pre>
<hr class='noprint'/><!--NewPage--><pre class='newpage'><span id="page-3" ></span>
<span class="grey"><a href="./rfc5244">RFC 5244</a> Channel-Oriented Signalling Events June 2008</span>
audio channels into the appropriate encoding, such as G.723.1 [<a href="#ref-13" title=""Speech coders : Dual rate speech coder for multimedia communications transmitting at 5.3 and 6.3 kbit/s"">13</a>] or
G.729 [<a href="#ref-14" title=""Coding of speech at 8 kbit/s using conjugate-structure algebraic-code-excited linear- prediction (CS-ACELP)"">14</a>]. However, this encoding process destroys in-band
signalling information that is carried using the least-significant
bit ("robbed bit signalling") and may also interfere with in-band
signalling tones, such as the MF (multi-frequency) digit tones.
In a typical application, the gateways may exchange roles from one
call to the next: they must be capable of either sending or receiving
each implemented signal in Table 1.
This document defines events related to four different signalling
systems. Three of these are based on the exchange of multi-frequency
tones. The fourth operates on digital trunks only, and makes use of
low-order bits stolen from the encoded media. In addition, this
document defines tone events for supporting tasks such as continuity
testing of the media path.
Implementors are warned that the descriptions of signalling
systems given below are incomplete. They are provided to give
context to the related event definitions, but omit many details
important to implementation.
<span class="h3"><a class="selflink" id="section-1.2" href="#section-1.2">1.2</a>. Terminology</span>
In this document, the key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED",
"SHALL", "SHALL NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY",
and "OPTIONAL" are to be interpreted as described in <a href="./rfc2119">RFC 2119</a> [<a href="#ref-1" title=""Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels"">1</a>] and
indicate requirement levels for compliant implementations.
In addition to the abbreviations defined below for specific events,
this document uses the following abbreviations:
KP Key Pulse
MF Multi-frequency
PSTN Public Switched (circuit) Telephone Network
RTP Real-time Transport Protocol [<a href="#ref-2" title=""RTP: A Transport Protocol for Real-Time Applications"">2</a>]
ST Start
<span class="grey">Schulzrinne & Taylor Standards Track [Page 3]</span></pre>
<hr class='noprint'/><!--NewPage--><pre class='newpage'><span id="page-4" ></span>
<span class="grey"><a href="./rfc5244">RFC 5244</a> Channel-Oriented Signalling Events June 2008</span>
<span class="h2"><a class="selflink" id="section-2" href="#section-2">2</a>. Event Definitions</span>
Table 1 lists all of the events defined in this document. As
indicated in Table 8 (Appendix A) of <a href="./rfc4733">RFC 4733</a> [<a href="#ref-4" title=""RTP Payload for DTMF Digits, Telephony Tones, and Telephony Signals"">4</a>], use of some of the
<a href="./rfc2833">RFC 2833</a> [<a href="#ref-11" title=""RTP Payload for DTMF Digits, Telephony Tones and Telephony Signals"">11</a>] event codes has been deprecated because their
specification was ambiguous, erroneous, or redundant. In fact, the
degree of change from <a href="./rfc2833#section-3.14">Section 3.14 of RFC 2833</a> is such that
implementations of the present document will be fully backward
compatible with <a href="./rfc2833">RFC 2833</a> implementations only in the case of full
ABCD-bit signalling. This document expands and improves the coverage
of signalling systems compared to <a href="./rfc2833">RFC 2833</a>.
Note that the IANA registry for telephony event codes was set up by
<a href="./rfc4733">RFC 4733</a>, not by <a href="./rfc2833">RFC 2833</a>. Thus, event code assignments originally
made in <a href="./rfc2833">RFC 2833</a> appear in the registry only if reaffirmed in <a href="./rfc4733">RFC</a>
<a href="./rfc4733">4733</a> or an update to <a href="./rfc4733">RFC 4733</a>, such as the present document.
<span class="grey">Schulzrinne & Taylor Standards Track [Page 4]</span></pre>
<hr class='noprint'/><!--NewPage--><pre class='newpage'><span id="page-5" ></span>
<span class="grey"><a href="./rfc5244">RFC 5244</a> Channel-Oriented Signalling Events June 2008</span>
+---------------------+------------+-------------+--------+---------+
| Event | Frequency | Event Code | Event | Volume? |
| | (Hz) | | Type | |
+---------------------+------------+-------------+--------+---------+
| MF 0...9 | (Table 2) | 128...137 | tone | yes |
| | | | | |
| MF Code 11 (SS No. | 700+1700 | 123 | tone | yes |
| 5) or KP3P/ST3P | | | | |
| (R1) | | | | |
| | | | | |
| MF KP (SS No. 5) or | 1100+1700 | 124 | tone | yes |
| KP1 (R1) | | | | |
| | | | | |
| MF KP2 (SS No. 5) | 1300+1700 | 125 | tone | yes |
| or KP2P/ST2P (R1) | | | | |
| | | | | |
| MF ST (SS No. 5 and | 1500+1700 | 126 | tone | yes |
| R1) | | | | |
| | | | | |
| MF Code 12 (SS No. | 900+1700 | 127 | tone | yes |
| 5) or KP'/STP (R1) | | | | |
| | | | | |
| ABCD signalling | N/A | 144...159 | state | no |
| | | | | |
| AB signalling (C, D | N/A | 208...211 | state | no |
| unused) | | | | |
| | | | | |
| A bit signalling | N/A | 206...207 | state | no |
| (B, C, D unused) | | | | |
| | | | | |
| Continuity | 2000 | 121 | tone | yes |
| check-tone | | | | |
| | | | | |
| Continuity | 1780 | 122 | tone | yes |
| verify-tone | | | | |
| | | | | |
| Metering pulse | N/A | 174 | other | no |
| | | | | |
| Trunk unavailable | N/A | 175 | other | no |
| | | | | |
| MFC Forward 1...15 | (Table 4) | 176...190 | tone | yes |
| | | | | |
| MFC Backward 1...15 | (Table 5) | 191...205 | tone | yes |
+---------------------+------------+-------------+--------+---------+
Table 1: Trunk Signalling Events
<span class="grey">Schulzrinne & Taylor Standards Track [Page 5]</span></pre>
<hr class='noprint'/><!--NewPage--><pre class='newpage'><span id="page-6" ></span>
<span class="grey"><a href="./rfc5244">RFC 5244</a> Channel-Oriented Signalling Events June 2008</span>
<span class="h3"><a class="selflink" id="section-2.1" href="#section-2.1">2.1</a>. Signalling System No. 5</span>
Signalling System No. 5 (SS No. 5) is defined in ITU-T
Recommendations Q.140 through Q.180 [<a href="#ref-5" title=""Specifications for signalling system no. 5"">5</a>]. It has two systems of
signals: "line" signalling to acquire and release the trunk, and
"register" signalling to pass digits forward from one switch to the
next.
<span class="h4"><a class="selflink" id="section-2.1.1" href="#section-2.1.1">2.1.1</a>. Signalling System No. 5 Line Signals</span>
No. 5 line signalling uses tones at two frequencies: 2400 and 2600
Hz. The tones are used singly for most signals, but together for the
Clear-forward and Release-guard. (This reduces the chance of an
accidental call release due to carried media content duplicating one
of the frequencies.) The specific signal indicated by a tone depends
on the stage of call set-up at which it is applied.
No events are defined in support of No. 5 line signalling. However,
implementations MAY use the AB bit events described in <a href="#section-2.4">Section 2.4</a>
and shown in Table 1 to propagate SS No. 5 line signals. If they do
so, they MUST use the following mappings. These mappings are based
on an underlying mapping equating A=0 to presence of 2400 Hz signal
and B=0 to presence of 2600 Hz signal in the indicated direction.
o both 2400 and 2600 Hz present: event code 208;
o 2400 Hz present: event code 210;
o 2600 Hz present: event code 209;
o neither signal present: event code 211.
The initial event report for each signal SHOULD be generated as soon
as the signal is recognized, and in any case no later than the time
of recognition as indicated in ITU-T Recommendation Q.141, Table 1
(i.e., 40 ms for "seizing" and "proceed-to-send", 125 ms for all
other signals). The packetization interval following the initial
report SHOULD be chosen with considerations of reliable transmission
given first priority. Note that the receiver must supply its own
volume values for converting these events back to tones. Moreover,
the receiver MAY extend the playout of "seizing" until it has
received the first report of a KP event (see below), so that it has
better control of the interval between ending of the seizing signal
and start of KP playout.
The KP has to be sent beginning 80 +/- 20 ms after the SS No. 5
"seizing" signal has stopped.
<span class="grey">Schulzrinne & Taylor Standards Track [Page 6]</span></pre>
<hr class='noprint'/><!--NewPage--><pre class='newpage'><span id="page-7" ></span>
<span class="grey"><a href="./rfc5244">RFC 5244</a> Channel-Oriented Signalling Events June 2008</span>
<span class="h4"><a class="selflink" id="section-2.1.2" href="#section-2.1.2">2.1.2</a>. Signalling System No. 5 Register Signals</span>
No. 5 register signalling uses pairs of tones to convey digits and
signals framing them. The tone combinations and corresponding
signals are shown in the Table 2. All signals except KP1 and KP2 are
sent for a duration of 55 ms. KP1 and KP2 are sent for a duration of
100 ms. Inter-signal pauses are always 55 ms.
Upper Frequency (Hz)
+-----------------+---------+---------+---------+---------+---------+
| Lower Frequency | 900 | 1100 | 1300 | 1500 | 1700 |
| (Hz) | | | | | |
+-----------------+---------+---------+---------+---------+---------+
| 700 | Digit 1 | Digit 2 | Digit 4 | Digit 7 | Code 11 |
| | | | | | |
| 900 | | Digit 3 | Digit 5 | Digit 8 | Code 12 |
| | | | | | |
| 1100 | | | Digit 6 | Digit 9 | KP1 |
| | | | | | |
| 1300 | | | | Digit 0 | KP2 |
| | | | | | |
| 1500 | | | | | ST |
+-----------------+---------+---------+---------+---------+---------+
Table 2: SS No. 5 Register Signals
The KP signals are used to indicate the start of digit signalling.
KP1 indicates a call expected to terminate in a national network
served by the switch to which the signalling is being sent. KP2
indicates a call that is expected to transit through the switch to
which the signalling is being sent, to another international
exchange. The end of digit signalling is indicated by the ST signal.
Code 11 or Code 12 following a country code (and possibly another
digit) indicates a call to be directed to an operator position in the
destination country. A Code 12 may be followed by other digits
indicating a particular operator to whom the call is to be directed.
Implementations using the telephone-events payload to carry SS No. 5
register signalling MUST use the following events from Table 1 to
convey the register signals shown in Table 2:
o event code 128 to convey Digit 0;
o event codes 129-137 to convey Digits 1 through 9, respectively;
o event code 123 to convey Code 11;
<span class="grey">Schulzrinne & Taylor Standards Track [Page 7]</span></pre>
<hr class='noprint'/><!--NewPage--><pre class='newpage'><span id="page-8" ></span>
<span class="grey"><a href="./rfc5244">RFC 5244</a> Channel-Oriented Signalling Events June 2008</span>
o event code 124 to convey KP1;
o event code 125 to convey KP2;
o event code 126 to convey ST;
o event code 127 to convey Code 12.
The sending implementation SHOULD send an initial event report for
the KP signals as soon as they are recognized, and it MUST send an
event report for all of these signals as soon as they have completed.
<span class="h3"><a class="selflink" id="section-2.2" href="#section-2.2">2.2</a>. Signalling System R1 and North American MF</span>
Signalling System R1 is mainly used in North America, as is the more
common variant designated simply as "MF". R1 is defined in ITU-T
Recommendations Q.310-Q.332 [<a href="#ref-6" title=""Specifications of Signalling System R1"">6</a>], while MF is defined in [<a href="#ref-9" title=""LSSGR: signalling for Analog Interfaces"">9</a>].
Like SS No. 5, R1/MF has both line and register signals. The line
signals (not counting Busy and Reorder) are implemented on analog
trunks through the application of a 2600 Hz tone, and on digital
trunks by using ABCD signalling. Interpretation of the line signals
is state-dependent (as with SS No. 5).
<span class="h4"><a class="selflink" id="section-2.2.1" href="#section-2.2.1">2.2.1</a>. Signalling System R1 Line Signals</span>
In accordance with Table 1/Q.311, implementations MAY use the A bit
events described in <a href="#section-2.4">Section 2.4</a> and shown in Table 1 to propagate R1
line signals. If they do so, they MUST use the following mappings.
These mappings are based on an underlying mapping equating A=0 to the
presence of a 2600 Hz signal in the indicated direction and A=1 to
the absence of that signal.
o 2600 Hz present: event code 206;
o no signal present: event code 207.
<span class="h4"><a class="selflink" id="section-2.2.2" href="#section-2.2.2">2.2.2</a>. Signalling System R1 Register Signals</span>
R1 has a signal capacity of 15 codes for forward inter-register
signals but no backward inter-register signals. Each code or digit
is transmitted by a tone pair from a set of 6 frequencies. The R1
register signals consist of KP, ST, and the digits "0" through "9".
The frequencies allotted to the signals are shown in Table 3. Note
<span class="grey">Schulzrinne & Taylor Standards Track [Page 8]</span></pre>
<hr class='noprint'/><!--NewPage--><pre class='newpage'><span id="page-9" ></span>
<span class="grey"><a href="./rfc5244">RFC 5244</a> Channel-Oriented Signalling Events June 2008</span>
that these frequencies are the same as those allotted to the
similarly named SS No. 5 register signals, except that KP uses the
frequency combination corresponding to KP1 in SS No. 5. Table 3 also
shows additional signals used in North American practice: KP', KP2P,
KP3P, STP or ST', ST2P, and ST3P [<a href="#ref-9" title=""LSSGR: signalling for Analog Interfaces"">9</a>].
Upper Frequency (Hz)
+------------+---------+---------+---------+---------+--------------+
| Lower | 900 | 1100 | 1300 | 1500 | 1700 |
| Frequency | | | | | |
| (Hz) | | | | | |
+------------+---------+---------+---------+---------+--------------+
| 700 | Digit 1 | Digit 2 | Digit 4 | Digit 7 | KP3P or ST3P |
| | | | | | |
| 900 | | Digit 3 | Digit 5 | Digit 8 | KP' or STP |
| | | | | | |
| 1100 | | | Digit 6 | Digit 9 | KP |
| | | | | | |
| 1300 | | | | Digit 0 | KP2P or ST2P |
| | | | | | |
| 1500 | | | | | ST |
+------------+---------+---------+---------+---------+--------------+
Table 3: R1/MF Register Signals
Implementations using the telephone-events payload to carry North
American R1 register signalling MUST use the following events from
Table 1 to convey the register signals shown in Table 3:
o event code 128 to convey Digit 0;
o event codes 129-137 to convey Digits 1 through 9, respectively;
o event code 123 to convey KP3P or ST3P;
o event code 124 to convey KP;
o event code 125 to convey KP2P or ST2P;
o event code 126 to convey ST;
o event code 127 to convey KP' or STP.
As with the original telephony signals, the receiver interprets
codes 123, 125, and 127 as KPx or STx signals based on their
position in the signalling sequence.
<span class="grey">Schulzrinne & Taylor Standards Track [Page 9]</span></pre>
<hr class='noprint'/><!--NewPage--><pre class='newpage'><span id="page-10" ></span>
<span class="grey"><a href="./rfc5244">RFC 5244</a> Channel-Oriented Signalling Events June 2008</span>
Unlike SS No. 5, R1 allows a large tolerance for the time of onset of
register signalling following the recognition of start-dialling line
signal. This means that sending implementations MAY wait to send a
KP event report until the KP has completed.
<span class="h3"><a class="selflink" id="section-2.3" href="#section-2.3">2.3</a>. Signalling System R2</span>
The International Signalling System R2 is described in ITU-T
Recommendations Q.400-Q.490 [<a href="#ref-7" title=""Specifications of Signalling System R2"">7</a>], but there are many national
variants. R2 line signals are continuous, out-of-band, link by link,
and channel associated. R2 (inter)register signals are multi-
frequency, compelled, in-band, end-to-end, and also channel
associated.
<span class="h4"><a class="selflink" id="section-2.3.1" href="#section-2.3.1">2.3.1</a>. Signalling System R2 Line Signals</span>
R2 line signals may be analog, one-bit digital using the A bit in the
16th channel, or digital using both A and B bits. Implementations
MAY use the A bit or AB bit events described in <a href="#section-2.4">Section 2.4</a> and shown
in Table 1 to propagate these signals. If they do so, they MUST use
the following mappings.
1. For the analog R2 line signals shown in Table 1 of ITU-T
Recommendation Q.411, implementations MUST map as follows. This
mapping is based on an underlying mapping of A bit = 0 when tone
is present.
* event code 206 (Table 1) is used to indicate the Q.411 "tone-
on" condition;
* event code 207 (Table 1), is used to indicate the Q.411 "tone-
off" condition.
2. The digital R2 line signals, as described by ITU-T Recommendation
Q.421, are carried in two bits, A and B. The mapping between A
and B bit values and event codes SHALL be the same in both
directions and SHALL follow the principles for A and B bit
mapping specified in <a href="#section-2.4">Section 2.4</a>.
<span class="h4"><a class="selflink" id="section-2.3.2" href="#section-2.3.2">2.3.2</a>. Signalling System R2 Register Signals</span>
In R2 signalling, the signalling sequence is initiated from the
outgoing exchange by sending a line "seizing" signal. After the line
"seizing" signal (and "seizing acknowledgment" signal in R2D), the
signalling sequence continues using MF register signals. ITU-T
Recommendation Q.441 classifies the forward MF register signals
<span class="grey">Schulzrinne & Taylor Standards Track [Page 10]</span></pre>
<hr class='noprint'/><!--NewPage--><pre class='newpage'><span id="page-11" ></span>
<span class="grey"><a href="./rfc5244">RFC 5244</a> Channel-Oriented Signalling Events June 2008</span>
(upper frequencies) into Groups I and II, the backward MF register
signals (lower frequencies) into Groups A and B. These groups are
significant with respect both to what sort of information they convey
and where they can occur in the signalling sequence.
The tones used in R2 register signalling are combinations of two out
of six frequencies. National versions may be reduced to 10 signals
(two out of five frequencies) or 6 signals (two out of four
frequencies).
R2 register signalling is a compelled tone signalling protocol,
meaning that one tone is played until an "acknowledgment or directive
for the next tone" is received that indicates that the original tone
should cease. A R2 forward register signal is acknowledged by a
backward signal. A backward signal is acknowledged by the end of the
forward signal. In exceptional circumstances specified in ITU-T Rec.
Q.442, the downstream entity may send backward signals autonomously
rather than in response to specific forward signals.
In R2 signalling, the signalling sequence is initiated from the
outgoing exchange by sending a forward Group I signal. The first
forward signal is typically the first digit of the called number.
The incoming exchange typically replies with a backward Group A-1
indicating to the outgoing exchange to send the next digit of the
called number.
The tones have meaning; however, the meaning varies depending on
where the tone occurs in the signalling. The meaning may also depend
on the country. Thus, to avoid an unmanageable number of events,
this document simply provides means to indicate the 15 forward and 15
backward MF R2 tones (i.e., using event codes 176-190 and 191-205,
respectively, as shown in Table 1). The frequency pairs for these
tones are shown in Table 4 and Table 5.
Note that a naive strategy for onward relay of R2 inter-register
signals may result in unacceptably long call setup times and timeouts
when the call passes through several exchanges as well as a gateway
before terminating. Several strategies are available for speeding up
the transfer of signalling information across a given relay point.
In the worst case, the relay point has to act as an exchange,
terminating the signalling on one side and reoriginating the call on
the other.
<span class="grey">Schulzrinne & Taylor Standards Track [Page 11]</span></pre>
<hr class='noprint'/><!--NewPage--><pre class='newpage'><span id="page-12" ></span>
<span class="grey"><a href="./rfc5244">RFC 5244</a> Channel-Oriented Signalling Events June 2008</span>
Upper Frequency (Hz)
+----------------------+-------+-------+-------+--------+--------+
| Lower Frequency (Hz) | 1500 | 1620 | 1740 | 1860 | 1980 |
+----------------------+-------+-------+-------+--------+--------+
| 1380 | Fwd 1 | Fwd 2 | Fwd 4 | Fwd 7 | Fwd 11 |
| | | | | | |
| 1500 | | Fwd 3 | Fwd 5 | Fwd 8 | Fwd 12 |
| | | | | | |
| 1620 | | | Fwd 6 | Fwd 9 | Fwd 13 |
| | | | | | |
| 1740 | | | | Fwd 10 | Fwd 14 |
| | | | | | |
| 1860 | | | | | Fwd 15 |
+----------------------+-------+-------+-------+--------+--------+
Table 4: R2 Forward Register Signals
Upper Frequency (Hz)
+-----------------+---------+---------+---------+---------+---------+
| Lower Frequency | 1140 | 1020 | 900 | 780 | 660 |
| (Hz) | | | | | |
+-----------------+---------+---------+---------+---------+---------+
| 1020 | Bkwd 1 | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| 900 | Bkwd 2 | Bkwd 3 | | | |
| | | | | | |
| 780 | Bkwd 4 | Bkwd 5 | Bkwd 6 | | |
| | | | | | |
| 660 | Bkwd 7 | Bkwd 8 | Bkwd 9 | Bkwd 10 | |
| | | | | | |
| 540 | Bkwd 11 | Bkwd 12 | Bkwd 13 | Bkwd 14 | Bkwd 15 |
+-----------------+---------+---------+---------+---------+---------+
Table 5: R2 Backward Register Signals
<span class="h3"><a class="selflink" id="section-2.4" href="#section-2.4">2.4</a>. ABCD Transitional Signalling for Digital Trunks</span>
ABCD is a 4-bit signalling system used by digital trunks, where A, B,
C, and D are the designations of the individual bits. Signalling may
be 16-state (all four bits used), 4-state (A and B bits used), or
2-state (A-bit only used). ABCD signalling events are all mutually
exclusive states. The most recent state transition determines the
current state.
<span class="grey">Schulzrinne & Taylor Standards Track [Page 12]</span></pre>
<hr class='noprint'/><!--NewPage--><pre class='newpage'><span id="page-13" ></span>
<span class="grey"><a href="./rfc5244">RFC 5244</a> Channel-Oriented Signalling Events June 2008</span>
When using Extended Super Frame (ESF) T1 framing, signalling
information is sent as robbed bits in frames 6, 12, 18, and 24. A D4
superframe only transmits 4-state signalling with A and B bits. On
the Conference of European Postal and Telecommunications (CEPT) E1
frame, all signalling is carried in timeslot 16, and two channels of
16-state (ABCD) signalling are sent per frame. ITU-T Recommendation
G.704 [<a href="#ref-10" title=""Synchronous frame structures used at 1544, 6312, 2048, 8448 and 44 736 kbit/s hierarchical levels"">10</a>] gives the details of ABCD bit placement within the various
framing arrangements.
The meaning of ABCD signals varies with the application. One example
of a specification of ABCD signalling codes is T1.403.02 [<a href="#ref-16" title=""Network and Customer Installation Interfaces -- DS1 Robbed-Bit signalling State Definitions"">16</a>], which
reflects North American practice for "loop" signalling as opposed to
the trunk signalling discussed in previous sections.
Since ABCD information is a state rather than a changing signal,
implementations SHOULD use the following triple-redundancy mechanism,
similar to the one specified in ITU-T Rec. I.366.2 [<a href="#ref-15" title=""AAL type 2 service specific convergence sublayer for trunking"">15</a>], Annex L. At
the time of a transition, the same ABCD information is sent 3 times
at an interval of 5 ms. If another transition occurs during this
time, then this continues. After a period of no change, the ABCD
information is sent every 5 seconds.
As shown in Table 1, the 16 possible states are represented by event
codes 144 to 159, respectively. Implementations using these event
codes MUST map them to and from the ABCD information based on the
following principles:
1. State numbers are derived from the used subset of ABCD bits by
treating them as a single binary number, where the A bit is the
high-order bit.
2. State numbers map to event codes by order of increasing value
(i.e., state number 0 maps to event code 144, ..., state number
15 maps to event code 159).
If only the A and B bits are being used, then the mapping to event
codes shall be as follows:
o A=0, B=0 maps to event code 208;
o A=0, B=1 maps to event code 209;
o A=1, B=0 maps to event code 210;
o A=1, B=1 maps to event code 211;
<span class="grey">Schulzrinne & Taylor Standards Track [Page 13]</span></pre>
<hr class='noprint'/><!--NewPage--><pre class='newpage'><span id="page-14" ></span>
<span class="grey"><a href="./rfc5244">RFC 5244</a> Channel-Oriented Signalling Events June 2008</span>
Finally, if only the A bit is used,
o A = 0 maps to event code 206;
o A = 1 maps to event code 207;
Separate event codes are assigned to A-bit and AB-bit signalling
because, as indicated in Rec. G.704 [<a href="#ref-10" title=""Synchronous frame structures used at 1544, 6312, 2048, 8448 and 44 736 kbit/s hierarchical levels"">10</a>], when the B, C, and D
bits are unused, their default values differ between transmission
systems. By specifying codes for only the used bits, this memo
allows the receiving gateway to fill in the remaining bits
according to local configuration.
<span class="h3"><a class="selflink" id="section-2.5" href="#section-2.5">2.5</a>. Continuity Tones</span>
Continuity tones are used for testing circuit continuity during call
setup. Two basic procedures are used. In international practice,
clause 7 of ITU-T Recommendation Q.724 [<a href="#ref-8" title=""Telephone user part signalling procedures"">8</a>] describes a procedure
applicable to four-wire trunk circuits, where a single 2000 +/- 20 Hz
check-tone is transmitted from the initiating telephone switch. The
remote switch sets up a loopback, and the continuity check passes if
the sending switch can detect the tone on the return path. Clause 8
of Q.724 describes the procedure for two-wire trunk circuits. The
two-wire procedure involves two tones: a 2000 Hz tone sent in the
forward direction and a 1780 +/- 20 Hz tone sent in response.
Note that implementations often send a slightly different check-tone,
e.g., 2010 Hz, because of undesirable aliasing properties of 2000 Hz.
If implementations use the telephone-events payload type to propagate
continuity check-tones, they MUST map these tones to event codes as
follows:
o For four-wire continuity testing, the 2000 Hz check-tone is mapped
to event code 121.
o For two-wire continuity testing, the initial 2000 Hz check-tone Hz
tone is mapped to event code 121. The 1780 Hz continuity
verify-tone is mapped to event code 122.
<span class="h3"><a class="selflink" id="section-2.6" href="#section-2.6">2.6</a>. Trunk Unavailable Event</span>
This event indicates that the trunk is unavailable for service. The
length of the downtime is indicated in the duration field. The
duration field is set to a value that allows adequate granularity in
describing downtime. A value of 1 second is RECOMMENDED. When the
<span class="grey">Schulzrinne & Taylor Standards Track [Page 14]</span></pre>
<hr class='noprint'/><!--NewPage--><pre class='newpage'><span id="page-15" ></span>
<span class="grey"><a href="./rfc5244">RFC 5244</a> Channel-Oriented Signalling Events June 2008</span>
trunk becomes unavailable, this event is sent with the same timestamp
three times at an interval of 20 ms. If the trunk persists in the
unavailable state at the end of the indicated duration, then the
event is retransmitted, preferably with the same redundancy scheme.
Unavailability of the trunk might result from a failure or an
administrative action. This event is used in a stateless manner to
synchronize trunk unavailability between equipment connected through
provisioned RTP trunks. It avoids the unnecessary consumption of
bandwidth in sending a continuous stream of RTP packets with a fixed
payload for the duration of the downtime, as would be required in
certain E1-based applications. In T1-based applications, trunk
conditioning via the ABCD transitional events can be used instead.
<span class="h3"><a class="selflink" id="section-2.7" href="#section-2.7">2.7</a>. Metering Pulse Event</span>
The metering pulse event may be used to transmit meter pulsing for
billing purposes. For background information, one possible reference
is <a href="http://www.seg.co.uk/telecomm/automat3.htm">http://www.seg.co.uk/telecomm/automat3.htm</a>. Since the metering
pulse is a discrete event, each metering pulse event report MUST have
both the 'M' and 'E' bits set. Meter pulsing is normally transmitted
by out-of-band means while conversation is in progress. Senders MUST
therefore be prepared to transmit both the telephone-event and audio
payload types simultaneously. Metering pulse events MUST be
retransmitted as recommended in <a href="./rfc4733#section-2.5.1.4">Section 2.5.1.4 of RFC 4733</a> [<a href="#ref-4" title=""RTP Payload for DTMF Digits, Telephony Tones, and Telephony Signals"">4</a>]. It
is RECOMMENDED that the retransmission interval be the lesser of 50
ms and the pulsing rate but no less than audio packetization rate.
<span class="h2"><a class="selflink" id="section-3" href="#section-3">3</a>. Congestion Considerations</span>
The ability to adapt to congestion varies with the signalling system
being used and also differs between line and register signals.
With the specific exception of register signalling for S.S. No. 5 and
R1/MF, the signals described in this document are fairly tolerant of
lengthened durations, should these be necessary. Thus in congested
conditions, the sender may adapt by lengthening the reporting
interval for the tones concerned. At the receiving end, if a tone is
being played out and an under-run occurs due to delayed or lost
packets, it is best to continue playing the tone until the next
packet arrives. Interrupting a tone prematurely, with or without
resumption, can cause the call setup attempt to fail, whereas
extended playout just increases the call setup time.
Register signalling for S.S. No. 5 and R1/MF is subject to time
constraints. Both the tone signals and the silent periods between
them have specified durations and tolerances of the order of 5 to 10
ms. The durations of the individual tones are of the order of two to
<span class="grey">Schulzrinne & Taylor Standards Track [Page 15]</span></pre>
<hr class='noprint'/><!--NewPage--><pre class='newpage'><span id="page-16" ></span>
<span class="grey"><a href="./rfc5244">RFC 5244</a> Channel-Oriented Signalling Events June 2008</span>
three packetization intervals (55/68 ms, with the initial KP lasting
100 ms). The critical requirement for transmission of the
telephony-event payload is that the receiver knows which signal to
play out at a given moment. It is less important that the receiver
receive timely notification of the end of each tone. Rather, it
should play out the sequence with the durations specified by the
signalling standard instead of the actual durations reported.
These considerations suggest that as soon as a register signal has
been reliably identified, the sender should emit a report of that
tone. It should then provide an update within 5 ms for reliability
and no more updates until reporting the end of the tone.
Increasing the playout buffer at the receiver during register
signalling will increase reliability. This has to be weighed against
the implied increase in call setup time.
<span class="h2"><a class="selflink" id="section-4" href="#section-4">4</a>. Security Considerations</span>
The events for which event codes are provided in this document relate
directly to the setup, billing, and takedown of telephone calls. As
such, they are subject, using the terminology of <a href="./rfc3552">RFC 3552</a> [<a href="#ref-12" title=""Guidelines for Writing RFC Text on Security Considerations"">12</a>], to
threats to both communications and system security. The attacks of
concern are:
o confidentiality violations (monitoring of calling and called
numbers);
o establishment of unauthorized telephone connections through
message insertion;
o hijacking of telephone connections through message insertion or
man-in-the-middle modification of messages;
o denial of service to individual telephone calls through message
insertion, modification, deletion, or delay.
These attacks can be prevented by the use of appropriate
confidentiality, authentication, or integrity protection. If
confidentiality, authentication, or integrity protection are needed,
then Secure Real-time Transport Protocol (SRTP) [<a href="#ref-3" title=""The Secure Real-time Transport Protocol (SRTP)"">3</a>] SHOULD be used
with automated key management.
Additional security considerations are described in <a href="./rfc4733">RFC 4733</a> [<a href="#ref-4" title=""RTP Payload for DTMF Digits, Telephony Tones, and Telephony Signals"">4</a>].
<span class="grey">Schulzrinne & Taylor Standards Track [Page 16]</span></pre>
<hr class='noprint'/><!--NewPage--><pre class='newpage'><span id="page-17" ></span>
<span class="grey"><a href="./rfc5244">RFC 5244</a> Channel-Oriented Signalling Events June 2008</span>
<span class="h2"><a class="selflink" id="section-5" href="#section-5">5</a>. IANA Considerations</span>
This document defines the event codes shown in Table 6. These events
are additions to the telephone-event registry established by <a href="./rfc4733">RFC 4733</a>
[<a href="#ref-4" title=""RTP Payload for DTMF Digits, Telephony Tones, and Telephony Signals"">4</a>]. The reference for all of them is the present document.
+------------+-----------------------------------------+-----------+
| Event Code | Event Name | Reference |
+------------+-----------------------------------------+-----------+
| 121 | Continuity check-tone | [<a href="./rfc5244">RFC5244</a>] |
| | | |
| 122 | Continuity verify-tone | [<a href="./rfc5244">RFC5244</a>] |
| | | |
| 123 | MF Code 11 (SS No. 5) or KP3P/ST3P (R1) | [<a href="./rfc5244">RFC5244</a>] |
| | | |
| 124 | MF KP (SS No. 5) or KP1 (R1) | [<a href="./rfc5244">RFC5244</a>] |
| | | |
| 125 | MF KP2 (SS No. 5) or KP2P/ST2P (R1) | [<a href="./rfc5244">RFC5244</a>] |
| | | |
| 126 | MF ST (SS No. 5 and R1) | [<a href="./rfc5244">RFC5244</a>] |
| | | |
| 127 | MF Code 12 (SS No. 5) or KP'/STP (R1) | [<a href="./rfc5244">RFC5244</a>] |
| | | |
| 128 | SS No. 5 or R1 digit "0" | [<a href="./rfc5244">RFC5244</a>] |
| | | |
| 129 | SS No. 5 or R1 digit "1" | [<a href="./rfc5244">RFC5244</a>] |
| | | |
| 130 | SS No. 5 or R1 digit "2" | [<a href="./rfc5244">RFC5244</a>] |
| | | |
| 131 | SS No. 5 or R1 digit "3" | [<a href="./rfc5244">RFC5244</a>] |
| | | |
| 132 | SS No. 5 or R1 digit "4" | [<a href="./rfc5244">RFC5244</a>] |
| | | |
| 133 | SS No. 5 or R1 digit "5" | [<a href="./rfc5244">RFC5244</a>] |
| | | |
| 134 | SS No. 5 or R1 digit "6" | [<a href="./rfc5244">RFC5244</a>] |
| | | |
| 135 | SS No. 5 or R1 digit "7" | [<a href="./rfc5244">RFC5244</a>] |
| | | |
| 136 | SS No. 5 or R1 digit "8" | [<a href="./rfc5244">RFC5244</a>] |
| | | |
| 137 | SS No. 5 or R1 digit "9" | [<a href="./rfc5244">RFC5244</a>] |
| | | |
| 144 | ABCD signalling state '0000' | [<a href="./rfc5244">RFC5244</a>] |
| | | |
| 145 | ABCD signalling state '0001' | [<a href="./rfc5244">RFC5244</a>] |
| | | |
| 146 | ABCD signalling state '0010' | [<a href="./rfc5244">RFC5244</a>] |
<span class="grey">Schulzrinne & Taylor Standards Track [Page 17]</span></pre>
<hr class='noprint'/><!--NewPage--><pre class='newpage'><span id="page-18" ></span>
<span class="grey"><a href="./rfc5244">RFC 5244</a> Channel-Oriented Signalling Events June 2008</span>
| | | |
| 147 | ABCD signalling state '0011' | [<a href="./rfc5244">RFC5244</a>] |
| | | |
| 148 | ABCD signalling state '0100' | [<a href="./rfc5244">RFC5244</a>] |
| | | |
| 149 | ABCD signalling state '0101' | [<a href="./rfc5244">RFC5244</a>] |
| | | |
| 150 | ABCD signalling state '0110' | [<a href="./rfc5244">RFC5244</a>] |
| | | |
| 151 | ABCD signalling state '0111' | [<a href="./rfc5244">RFC5244</a>] |
| | | |
| 152 | ABCD signalling state '1000' | [<a href="./rfc5244">RFC5244</a>] |
| | | |
| 153 | ABCD signalling state '1001' | [<a href="./rfc5244">RFC5244</a>] |
| | | |
| 154 | ABCD signalling state '1010' | [<a href="./rfc5244">RFC5244</a>] |
| | | |
| 155 | ABCD signalling state '1011' | [<a href="./rfc5244">RFC5244</a>] |
| | | |
| 156 | ABCD signalling state '1100' | [<a href="./rfc5244">RFC5244</a>] |
| | | |
| 157 | ABCD signalling state '1101' | [<a href="./rfc5244">RFC5244</a>] |
| | | |
| 158 | ABCD signalling state '1110' | [<a href="./rfc5244">RFC5244</a>] |
| | | |
| 159 | ABCD signalling state '1111' | [<a href="./rfc5244">RFC5244</a>] |
| | | |
| 174 | Metering pulse | [<a href="./rfc5244">RFC5244</a>] |
| | | |
| 175 | Trunk unavailable | [<a href="./rfc5244">RFC5244</a>] |
| | | |
| 176 | MFC forward signal 1 | [<a href="./rfc5244">RFC5244</a>] |
| | | |
| 177 | MFC forward signal 2 | [<a href="./rfc5244">RFC5244</a>] |
| | | |
| 178 | MFC forward signal 3 | [<a href="./rfc5244">RFC5244</a>] |
| | | |
| 179 | MFC forward signal 4 | [<a href="./rfc5244">RFC5244</a>] |
| | | |
| 180 | MFC forward signal 5 | [<a href="./rfc5244">RFC5244</a>] |
| | | |
| 181 | MFC forward signal 6 | [<a href="./rfc5244">RFC5244</a>] |
| | | |
| 182 | MFC forward signal 7 | [<a href="./rfc5244">RFC5244</a>] |
| | | |
| 183 | MFC forward signal 8 | [<a href="./rfc5244">RFC5244</a>] |
| | | |
| 184 | MFC forward signal 9 | [<a href="./rfc5244">RFC5244</a>] |
<span class="grey">Schulzrinne & Taylor Standards Track [Page 18]</span></pre>
<hr class='noprint'/><!--NewPage--><pre class='newpage'><span id="page-19" ></span>
<span class="grey"><a href="./rfc5244">RFC 5244</a> Channel-Oriented Signalling Events June 2008</span>
| | | |
| 185 | MFC forward signal 10 | [<a href="./rfc5244">RFC5244</a>] |
| | | |
| 186 | MFC forward signal 11 | [<a href="./rfc5244">RFC5244</a>] |
| | | |
| 187 | MFC forward signal 12 | [<a href="./rfc5244">RFC5244</a>] |
| | | |
| 188 | MFC forward signal 13 | [<a href="./rfc5244">RFC5244</a>] |
| | | |
| 189 | MFC forward signal 14 | [<a href="./rfc5244">RFC5244</a>] |
| | | |
| 190 | MFC forward signal 15 | [<a href="./rfc5244">RFC5244</a>] |
| | | |
| 191 | MFC backward signal 1 | [<a href="./rfc5244">RFC5244</a>] |
| | | |
| 192 | MFC backward signal 2 | [<a href="./rfc5244">RFC5244</a>] |
| | | |
| 193 | MFC backward signal 3 | [<a href="./rfc5244">RFC5244</a>] |
| | | |
| 194 | MFC backward signal 4 | [<a href="./rfc5244">RFC5244</a>] |
| | | |
| 195 | MFC backward signal 5 | [<a href="./rfc5244">RFC5244</a>] |
| | | |
| 196 | MFC backward signal 6 | [<a href="./rfc5244">RFC5244</a>] |
| | | |
| 197 | MFC backward signal 7 | [<a href="./rfc5244">RFC5244</a>] |
| | | |
| 198 | MFC backward signal 8 | [<a href="./rfc5244">RFC5244</a>] |
| | | |
| 199 | MFC backward signal 9 | [<a href="./rfc5244">RFC5244</a>] |
| | | |
| 200 | MFC backward signal 10 | [<a href="./rfc5244">RFC5244</a>] |
| | | |
| 201 | MFC backward signal 11 | [<a href="./rfc5244">RFC5244</a>] |
| | | |
| 202 | MFC backward signal 12 | [<a href="./rfc5244">RFC5244</a>] |
| | | |
| 203 | MFC backward signal 13 | [<a href="./rfc5244">RFC5244</a>] |
| | | |
| 204 | MFC backward signal 14 | [<a href="./rfc5244">RFC5244</a>] |
| | | |
| 205 | MFC backward signal 15 | [<a href="./rfc5244">RFC5244</a>] |
| | | |
| 206 | A bit signalling state '0' | [<a href="./rfc5244">RFC5244</a>] |
| | | |
| 207 | A bit signalling state '1' | [<a href="./rfc5244">RFC5244</a>] |
| | | |
| 208 | AB bit signalling state '00' | [<a href="./rfc5244">RFC5244</a>] |
<span class="grey">Schulzrinne & Taylor Standards Track [Page 19]</span></pre>
<hr class='noprint'/><!--NewPage--><pre class='newpage'><span id="page-20" ></span>
<span class="grey"><a href="./rfc5244">RFC 5244</a> Channel-Oriented Signalling Events June 2008</span>
| | | |
| 209 | AB bit signalling state '01' | [<a href="./rfc5244">RFC5244</a>] |
| | | |
| 210 | AB bit signalling state '10' | [<a href="./rfc5244">RFC5244</a>] |
| | | |
| 211 | AB bit signalling state '11' | [<a href="./rfc5244">RFC5244</a>] |
+------------+-----------------------------------------+-----------+
Table 6: Channel-Oriented Signalling Events in the
Audio/Telephone-Event Event Code Registry
<span class="h2"><a class="selflink" id="section-6" href="#section-6">6</a>. Acknowledgements</span>
The complete list of acknowledgements for contribution to the
development and revision of <a href="./rfc2833">RFC 2833</a> is contained in <a href="./rfc4733">RFC 4733</a> [<a href="#ref-4" title=""RTP Payload for DTMF Digits, Telephony Tones, and Telephony Signals"">4</a>].
The Editor believes or is aware that the following people contributed
specifically to the present document: Flemming Andreasen, Rex
Coldren, Bill Foster, Alfred Hoenes, Rajesh Kumar, Aleksandar Lebl,
Zarko Markov, Oren Peleg, Moshe Samoha, Adrian Soncodi, and Yaakov
Stein. Steve Norreys and Roni Even provided useful review comments.
<span class="h2"><a class="selflink" id="section-7" href="#section-7">7</a>. References</span>
<span class="h3"><a class="selflink" id="section-7.1" href="#section-7.1">7.1</a>. Normative References</span>
[<a id="ref-1">1</a>] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement
Levels", <a href="https://www.rfc-editor.org/bcp/bcp14">BCP 14</a>, <a href="./rfc2119">RFC 2119</a>, March 1997.
[<a id="ref-2">2</a>] Schulzrinne, H., Casner, S., Frederick, R., and V. Jacobson,
"RTP: A Transport Protocol for Real-Time Applications", STD 64,
<a href="./rfc3550">RFC 3550</a>, July 2003.
[<a id="ref-3">3</a>] Baugher, M., McGrew, D., Naslund, M., Carrara, E., and K.
Norrman, "The Secure Real-time Transport Protocol (SRTP)", <a href="./rfc3711">RFC</a>
<a href="./rfc3711">3711</a>, March 2004.
[<a id="ref-4">4</a>] Schulzrinne, H. and T. Taylor, "RTP Payload for DTMF Digits,
Telephony Tones, and Telephony Signals", <a href="./rfc4733">RFC 4733</a>, December
2006.
[<a id="ref-5">5</a>] International Telecommunication Union, "Specifications for
signalling system no. 5", ITU-T Recommendation Q.140-Q.180,
November 1988.
[<a id="ref-6">6</a>] International Telecommunication Union, "Specifications of
Signalling System R1", ITU-T Recommendation Q.310-Q.332,
November 1988.
<span class="grey">Schulzrinne & Taylor Standards Track [Page 20]</span></pre>
<hr class='noprint'/><!--NewPage--><pre class='newpage'><span id="page-21" ></span>
<span class="grey"><a href="./rfc5244">RFC 5244</a> Channel-Oriented Signalling Events June 2008</span>
[<a id="ref-7">7</a>] International Telecommunication Union, "Specifications of
Signalling System R2", ITU-T Recommendation Q.400-Q.490,
November 1988.
[<a id="ref-8">8</a>] International Telecommunication Union, "Telephone user part
signalling procedures", ITU-T Recommendation Q.724, November
1988.
[<a id="ref-9">9</a>] Telcordia Technologies, "LSSGR: signalling for Analog
Interfaces", Generic Requirement GR-506, June 1996.
[<a id="ref-10">10</a>] International Telecommunication Union, "Synchronous frame
structures used at 1544, 6312, 2048, 8448 and 44 736 kbit/s
hierarchical levels", ITU-T Recommendation G.704, October 1998.
<span class="h3"><a class="selflink" id="section-7.2" href="#section-7.2">7.2</a>. Informative References</span>
[<a id="ref-11">11</a>] Schulzrinne, H. and S. Petrack, "RTP Payload for DTMF Digits,
Telephony Tones and Telephony Signals", <a href="./rfc2833">RFC 2833</a>, May 2000.
[<a id="ref-12">12</a>] Rescorla, E. and B. Korver, "Guidelines for Writing RFC Text on
Security Considerations", <a href="https://www.rfc-editor.org/bcp/bcp72">BCP 72</a>, <a href="./rfc3552">RFC 3552</a>, July 2003.
[<a id="ref-13">13</a>] International Telecommunication Union, "Speech coders : Dual
rate speech coder for multimedia communications transmitting at
5.3 and 6.3 kbit/s", ITU-T Recommendation G.723.1, March 1996.
[<a id="ref-14">14</a>] International Telecommunication Union, "Coding of speech at 8
kbit/s using conjugate-structure algebraic-code-excited linear-
prediction (CS-ACELP)", ITU-T Recommendation G.729, March 1996.
[<a id="ref-15">15</a>] International Telecommunication Union, "AAL type 2 service
specific convergence sublayer for trunking", ITU-T
Recommendation I.366.2, February 1999.
[<a id="ref-16">16</a>] ANSI/T1, "Network and Customer Installation Interfaces -- DS1
Robbed-Bit signalling State Definitions", American National
Standard for Telecommunications T1.403.02-1999, May 1999.
<span class="grey">Schulzrinne & Taylor Standards Track [Page 21]</span></pre>
<hr class='noprint'/><!--NewPage--><pre class='newpage'><span id="page-22" ></span>
<span class="grey"><a href="./rfc5244">RFC 5244</a> Channel-Oriented Signalling Events June 2008</span>
Authors' Addresses
Henning Schulzrinne
Columbia U.
Dept. of Computer Science
Columbia University
1214 Amsterdam Avenue
New York, NY 10027
US
EMail: schulzrinne@cs.columbia.edu
Tom Taylor
Nortel
1852 Lorraine Ave
Ottawa, Ontario K1H 6Z8
CA
EMail: tom.taylor@rogers.com
<span class="grey">Schulzrinne & Taylor Standards Track [Page 22]</span></pre>
<hr class='noprint'/><!--NewPage--><pre class='newpage'><span id="page-23" ></span>
<span class="grey"><a href="./rfc5244">RFC 5244</a> Channel-Oriented Signalling Events June 2008</span>
Full Copyright Statement
Copyright (C) The IETF Trust (2008).
This document is subject to the rights, licenses and restrictions
contained in <a href="https://www.rfc-editor.org/bcp/bcp78">BCP 78</a>, and except as set forth therein, the authors
retain all their rights.
This document and the information contained herein are provided on an
"AS IS" basis and THE CONTRIBUTOR, THE ORGANIZATION HE/SHE REPRESENTS
OR IS SPONSORED BY (IF ANY), THE INTERNET SOCIETY, THE IETF TRUST AND
THE INTERNET ENGINEERING TASK FORCE DISCLAIM ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS
OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTY THAT THE USE OF
THE INFORMATION HEREIN WILL NOT INFRINGE ANY RIGHTS OR ANY IMPLIED
WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
Intellectual Property
The IETF takes no position regarding the validity or scope of any
Intellectual Property Rights or other rights that might be claimed to
pertain to the implementation or use of the technology described in
this document or the extent to which any license under such rights
might or might not be available; nor does it represent that it has
made any independent effort to identify any such rights. Information
on the procedures with respect to rights in RFC documents can be
found in <a href="https://www.rfc-editor.org/bcp/bcp78">BCP 78</a> and <a href="https://www.rfc-editor.org/bcp/bcp79">BCP 79</a>.
Copies of IPR disclosures made to the IETF Secretariat and any
assurances of licenses to be made available, or the result of an
attempt made to obtain a general license or permission for the use of
such proprietary rights by implementers or users of this
specification can be obtained from the IETF on-line IPR repository at
<a href="http://www.ietf.org/ipr">http://www.ietf.org/ipr</a>.
The IETF invites any interested party to bring to its attention any
copyrights, patents or patent applications, or other proprietary
rights that may cover technology that may be required to implement
this standard. Please address the information to the IETF at
ietf-ipr@ietf.org.
Schulzrinne & Taylor Standards Track [Page 23]
</pre>
|