File: rfc5793.html

package info (click to toggle)
doc-rfc 20230121-1
links: PTS, VCS
area: non-free
in suites: bookworm, forky, sid, trixie
size: 1,609,944 kB
file content (4253 lines) | stat: -rw-r--r-- 197,674 bytes
parent folder | download | duplicates (2)
<pre>Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF)                         R. Sahita
Request for Comments: 5793                                         Intel
Category: Standards Track                                       S. Hanna
ISSN: 2070-1721                                                  Juniper
                                                                R. Hurst
                                                               Microsoft
                                                              K. Narayan
                                                           Cisco Systems
                                                              March 2010


           <span class="h1">PB-TNC: A Posture Broker (PB) Protocol Compatible</span>
                   <span class="h1">with Trusted Network Connect (TNC)</span>

Abstract

   This document specifies PB-TNC, a Posture Broker protocol identical
   to the Trusted Computing Group's IF-TNCCS 2.0 protocol.  The document
   then evaluates PB-TNC against the requirements defined in the NEA
   Requirements specification.

Status of This Memo

   This is an Internet Standards Track document.

   This document is a product of the Internet Engineering Task Force
   (IETF).  It represents the consensus of the IETF community.  It has
   received public review and has been approved for publication by the
   Internet Engineering Steering Group (IESG).  Further information on
   Internet Standards is available in <a href="./rfc5741#section-2">Section&nbsp;2 of RFC 5741</a>.

   Information about the current status of this document, any errata,
   and how to provide feedback on it may be obtained at
   <a href="http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5793">http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5793</a>.

















<span class="grey">Sahita, et al.               Standards Track                    [Page 1]</span></pre>
<hr class='noprint'/><!--NewPage--><pre class='newpage'><span id="page-2" ></span>
<span class="grey"><a href="./rfc5793">RFC 5793</a>                         PB-TNC                       March 2010</span>


Copyright Notice

   Copyright (c) 2010 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
   document authors.  All rights reserved.

   This document is subject to <a href="https://www.rfc-editor.org/bcp/bcp78">BCP 78</a> and the IETF Trust's Legal
   Provisions Relating to IETF Documents
   (<a href="http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info">http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info</a>) in effect on the date of
   publication of this document.  Please review these documents
   carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect
   to this document.  Code Components extracted from this document must
   include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of
   the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as
   described in the Simplified BSD License.

   This document may contain material from IETF Documents or IETF
   Contributions published or made publicly available before November
   10, 2008.  The person(s) controlling the copyright in some of this
   material may not have granted the IETF Trust the right to allow
   modifications of such material outside the IETF Standards Process.
   Without obtaining an adequate license from the person(s) controlling
   the copyright in such materials, this document may not be modified
   outside the IETF Standards Process, and derivative works of it may
   not be created outside the IETF Standards Process, except to format
   it for publication as an RFC or to translate it into languages other
   than English.

Table of Contents

   <a href="#section-1">1</a>. Introduction ....................................................<a href="#page-4">4</a>
      <a href="#section-1.1">1.1</a>. Prerequisites ..............................................<a href="#page-4">4</a>
      <a href="#section-1.2">1.2</a>. Message Diagram Conventions ................................<a href="#page-4">4</a>
      <a href="#section-1.3">1.3</a>. Terminology ................................................<a href="#page-4">4</a>
      <a href="#section-1.4">1.4</a>. Conventions Used in This Document ..........................<a href="#page-4">4</a>
   <a href="#section-2">2</a>. PB-TNC Design Considerations ....................................<a href="#page-5">5</a>
      <a href="#section-2.1">2.1</a>. Message Addressing .........................................<a href="#page-5">5</a>
      <a href="#section-2.2">2.2</a>. Vendor IDs .................................................<a href="#page-7">7</a>
      <a href="#section-2.3">2.3</a>. Efficiency .................................................<a href="#page-7">7</a>
   <a href="#section-3">3</a>. PB-TNC Protocol Description .....................................<a href="#page-7">7</a>
      <a href="#section-3.1">3.1</a>. Protocol Overview ..........................................<a href="#page-7">7</a>
      <a href="#section-3.2">3.2</a>. PB-TNC State Machine .......................................<a href="#page-8">8</a>
      <a href="#section-3.3">3.3</a>. Layering on PT ............................................<a href="#page-11">11</a>
      <a href="#section-3.4">3.4</a>. Example of PB-TNC Encapsulation ...........................<a href="#page-12">12</a>
   <a href="#section-4">4</a>. PB-TNC Protocol Specification ..................................<a href="#page-13">13</a>
      <a href="#section-4.1">4.1</a>. PB-TNC Header .............................................<a href="#page-13">13</a>
      <a href="#section-4.2">4.2</a>. PB-TNC Message ............................................<a href="#page-16">16</a>
      <a href="#section-4.3">4.3</a>. IETF Standard PB-TNC Message Types ........................<a href="#page-19">19</a>
      <a href="#section-4.4">4.4</a>. PB-Experimental ...........................................<a href="#page-19">19</a>



<span class="grey">Sahita, et al.               Standards Track                    [Page 2]</span></pre>
<hr class='noprint'/><!--NewPage--><pre class='newpage'><span id="page-3" ></span>
<span class="grey"><a href="./rfc5793">RFC 5793</a>                         PB-TNC                       March 2010</span>


      <a href="#section-4.5">4.5</a>. PB-PA .....................................................<a href="#page-20">20</a>
      <a href="#section-4.6">4.6</a>. PB-Assessment-Result ......................................<a href="#page-25">25</a>
      <a href="#section-4.7">4.7</a>. PB-Access-Recommendation ..................................<a href="#page-26">26</a>
      <a href="#section-4.8">4.8</a>. PB-Remediation-Parameters .................................<a href="#page-28">28</a>
      <a href="#section-4.9">4.9</a>. PB-Error ..................................................<a href="#page-32">32</a>
      <a href="#section-4.10">4.10</a>. PB-Language-Preference ...................................<a href="#page-37">37</a>
      <a href="#section-4.11">4.11</a>. PB-Reason-String .........................................<a href="#page-38">38</a>
   <a href="#section-5">5</a>. Security Considerations ........................................<a href="#page-41">41</a>
      <a href="#section-5.1">5.1</a>. Threat Model ..............................................<a href="#page-41">41</a>
      <a href="#section-5.2">5.2</a>. Countermeasures ...........................................<a href="#page-42">42</a>
   <a href="#section-6">6</a>. IANA Considerations ............................................<a href="#page-43">43</a>
      <a href="#section-6.1">6.1</a>. Designated Expert Guidelines ..............................<a href="#page-44">44</a>
      <a href="#section-6.2">6.2</a>. Registry for PB-TNC Message Types .........................<a href="#page-45">45</a>
      <a href="#section-6.3">6.3</a>. Registry for PA Subtypes ..................................<a href="#page-45">45</a>
      <a href="#section-6.4">6.4</a>. Registry for PB-TNC Remediation Parameters Types ..........<a href="#page-46">46</a>
      <a href="#section-6.5">6.5</a>. Registry for PB-TNC Error Codes ...........................<a href="#page-46">46</a>
   <a href="#section-7">7</a>. Acknowledgments ................................................<a href="#page-47">47</a>
   <a href="#section-8">8</a>. References .....................................................<a href="#page-47">47</a>
      <a href="#section-8.1">8.1</a>. Normative References ......................................<a href="#page-47">47</a>
      <a href="#section-8.2">8.2</a>. Informative References ....................................<a href="#page-48">48</a>
   <a href="#appendix-A">Appendix A</a>. Use Cases .............................................<a href="#page-49">49</a>
      <a href="#appendix-A.1">A.1</a>. Initial Client-Triggered Assessment .......................<a href="#page-49">49</a>
      <a href="#appendix-A.2">A.2</a>. Server-Initiated Assessment with Remediation ..............<a href="#page-54">54</a>
      <a href="#appendix-A.3">A.3</a>. Client-Triggered Reassessment .............................<a href="#page-63">63</a>
   <a href="#appendix-B">Appendix B</a>. Evaluation against NEA Requirements ...................<a href="#page-70">70</a>
      <a href="#appendix-B.1">B.1</a>. Evaluation against Requirement C-1 ........................<a href="#page-70">70</a>
      <a href="#appendix-B.2">B.2</a>. Evaluation against Requirement C-2 ........................<a href="#page-70">70</a>
      <a href="#appendix-B.3">B.3</a>. Evaluation against Requirement C-3 ........................<a href="#page-70">70</a>
      <a href="#appendix-B.4">B.4</a>. Evaluation against Requirement C-4 ........................<a href="#page-71">71</a>
      <a href="#appendix-B.5">B.5</a>. Evaluation against Requirement C-5 ........................<a href="#page-71">71</a>
      <a href="#appendix-B.6">B.6</a>. Evaluation against Requirement C-6 ........................<a href="#page-71">71</a>
      <a href="#appendix-B.7">B.7</a>. Evaluation against Requirement C-7 ........................<a href="#page-72">72</a>
      <a href="#appendix-B.8">B.8</a>. Evaluation against Requirement C-8 ........................<a href="#page-72">72</a>
      <a href="#appendix-B.9">B.9</a>. Evaluation against Requirement C-9 ........................<a href="#page-72">72</a>
      <a href="#appendix-B.10">B.10</a>. Evaluation against Requirement C-10 ......................<a href="#page-73">73</a>
      <a href="#appendix-B.11">B.11</a>. Evaluation against Requirement C-11 ......................<a href="#page-73">73</a>
      <a href="#appendix-B.12">B.12</a>. Evaluation against Requirement PB-1 ......................<a href="#page-74">74</a>
      <a href="#appendix-B.13">B.13</a>. Evaluation against Requirement PB-2 ......................<a href="#page-74">74</a>
      <a href="#appendix-B.14">B.14</a>. Evaluation against Requirement PB-3 ......................<a href="#page-74">74</a>
      <a href="#appendix-B.15">B.15</a>. Evaluation against Requirement PB-4 ......................<a href="#page-75">75</a>
      <a href="#appendix-B.16">B.16</a>. Evaluation against Requirement PB-5 ......................<a href="#page-75">75</a>
      <a href="#appendix-B.17">B.17</a>. Evaluation against Requirement PB-6 ......................<a href="#page-76">76</a>









<span class="grey">Sahita, et al.               Standards Track                    [Page 3]</span></pre>
<hr class='noprint'/><!--NewPage--><pre class='newpage'><span id="page-4" ></span>
<span class="grey"><a href="./rfc5793">RFC 5793</a>                         PB-TNC                       March 2010</span>


<span class="h2"><a class="selflink" id="section-1" href="#section-1">1</a>.  Introduction</span>

   This document specifies PB-TNC, a Posture Broker (PB) protocol
   identical to the Trusted Computing Group's IF-TNCCS 2.0 protocol [<a href="#ref-7" title="&quot;TNC IF-TNCCS: TLV Binding&quot;">7</a>].
   The document then evaluates PB-TNC against the requirements defined
   in the Network Endpoint Assessment (NEA) Requirements specification
   [<a href="#ref-8" title="&quot;Network Endpoint Assessment (NEA): Overview and Requirements&quot;">8</a>].

<span class="h3"><a class="selflink" id="section-1.1" href="#section-1.1">1.1</a>.  Prerequisites</span>

   This document does not define an architecture or reference model.
   Instead, it defines a protocol that works within the reference model
   described in the NEA Requirements specification [<a href="#ref-8" title="&quot;Network Endpoint Assessment (NEA): Overview and Requirements&quot;">8</a>].  The reader is
   assumed to be thoroughly familiar with that document.  No familiarity
   with TCG specifications is assumed.

<span class="h3"><a class="selflink" id="section-1.2" href="#section-1.2">1.2</a>.  Message Diagram Conventions</span>

   This specification defines the syntax of PB-TNC messages using
   diagrams.  Each diagram depicts the format and size of each field in
   bits.  Implementations MUST send the bits in each diagram as they are
   shown, traversing the diagram from top to bottom and then from left
   to right within each line (which represents a 32-bit quantity).
   Multi-byte fields representing numeric values must be sent in network
   (big endian) byte order.

   Descriptions of bit field (e.g., flag) values are described referring
   to the position of the bit within the field.  These bit positions are
   numbered from the most significant bit through the least significant
   bit, so a 1-octet field with only bit 0 set has the value 0x80.

<span class="h3"><a class="selflink" id="section-1.3" href="#section-1.3">1.3</a>.  Terminology</span>

   This document reuses the terminology defined in the NEA Requirements
   document.  One new term is defined in this section.

   Batch - A group of PB-TNC messages sent over a Posture Transport (PT)
   protocol at one time.  Since the PB-TNC protocol needs to be able to
   work over a half-duplex PT protocol, PB-TNC messages are grouped into
   batches.  The Posture Broker Client sends one batch to the Posture
   Broker Server, which responds with a batch.

<span class="h3"><a class="selflink" id="section-1.4" href="#section-1.4">1.4</a>.  Conventions Used in This Document</span>

   The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
   "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this
   document are to be interpreted as described in <a href="./rfc2119">RFC 2119</a> [<a href="#ref-1" title="&quot;Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels&quot;">1</a>].




<span class="grey">Sahita, et al.               Standards Track                    [Page 4]</span></pre>
<hr class='noprint'/><!--NewPage--><pre class='newpage'><span id="page-5" ></span>
<span class="grey"><a href="./rfc5793">RFC 5793</a>                         PB-TNC                       March 2010</span>


<span class="h2"><a class="selflink" id="section-2" href="#section-2">2</a>.  PB-TNC Design Considerations</span>

   The primary purpose of the PB-TNC protocol is to carry Posture
   Attribute (PA) messages between Posture Collectors and Posture
   Validators.  Also, PB-TNC must carry messages between the Posture
   Broker Client and the Posture Broker Server (known as PB-TNC
   messages) and manage the state of the assessment.

<span class="h3"><a class="selflink" id="section-2.1" href="#section-2.1">2.1</a>.  Message Addressing</span>

   The NEA Overview and Requirements document [<a href="#ref-8" title="&quot;Network Endpoint Assessment (NEA): Overview and Requirements&quot;">8</a>] describes in <a href="#section-5.1.1.1">section</a>
   <a href="#section-5.1.1.1">5.1.1.1</a> several ways that messages can be addressed and delivered to
   the proper Posture Collector(s) and Posture Validator(s).  Of the
   techniques described in that section, PB-TNC supports dynamic
   identifiers and message types.

<span class="h4"><a class="selflink" id="section-2.1.1" href="#section-2.1.1">2.1.1</a>.  Message Types</span>

   Message types are the simplest and most common way to handle message
   delivery.  Each PA message sent via PB-TNC has an associated PA
   message type, composed of a PA Message Vendor ID and a PA subtype.

   The PA-TNC specification [<a href="#ref-10" title="&quot;PA-TNC: A Posture Attribute (PA) Protocol Compatible with Trusted Network Connect (TNC)&quot;">10</a>] provides a list of IETF Standard PA
   Subtypes, which are used with a PA Message Vendor ID of 0.  These
   include values such as Operating System and Anti-Virus, which are
   used for messages relating to operating system and anti-virus
   posture.

   Vendor-specific PA message types may be indicated by placing the
   defining vendor's Structure of Management Information (SMI) Private
   Enterprise Number into the PA Message Vendor ID field and a PA
   Subtype value assigned by that vendor in the PA Subtype field.  This
   allows each vendor to define its own set of PA Subtype values without
   worrying about collisions with other vendors or with standard values.

   The PA message type is somewhat analogous to a MIME type in that it
   indicates the type of the PA message.  Posture Collectors and Posture
   Validators can use local APIs to indicate to the Posture Broker
   Client and Posture Broker Server which PA message types they are
   interested in receiving.  For instance, a Posture Validator that
   evaluates anti-virus posture might indicate that it would like to
   receive PA messages with a PA Message Vendor ID of 0 and a PA Subtype
   that matches the IETF Standard PA Subtype for Anti-Virus.  It might
   also indicate interest in some vendor-specific PA message types to
   get additional vendor-specific information on anti-virus posture.






<span class="grey">Sahita, et al.               Standards Track                    [Page 5]</span></pre>
<hr class='noprint'/><!--NewPage--><pre class='newpage'><span id="page-6" ></span>
<span class="grey"><a href="./rfc5793">RFC 5793</a>                         PB-TNC                       March 2010</span>


   This type-based subscription model allows great flexibility in design
   and implementation.  One Posture Validator may be responsible for
   evaluating several functions: anti-virus and host-based firewall, for
   instance.  Posture Collectors do not need to know which Posture
   Validators are installed on the Posture Broker Server or what they
   handle.  The Posture Collector simply sends PA messages with message
   types and the Posture Broker Server delivers them to the right
   Posture Validators.

   Because the Posture Broker Client and Posture Broker Server must have
   access to the PA Message Vendor ID and PA Subtype fields and because
   these are routing identifiers independent of the contents of the PA
   messages, these fields are located in PB-TNC not inside the PA
   messages themselves.

   A similar type-based system is used to tag PB-TNC messages.  In this
   case, the extensibility benefits are not as essential as with PA-TNC
   messages, but the ability to define IETF Standard PB-TNC Message
   Types and vendor-specific PB-TNC message types is still valuable.

<span class="h4"><a class="selflink" id="section-2.1.2" href="#section-2.1.2">2.1.2</a>.  Dynamic Identifiers</span>

   The type-based message delivery model described above is not ideal
   for all circumstances.  Sometimes it is important for a Posture
   Collector to deliver a message to a particular Posture Validator.
   For example, a particular Posture Validator might send a remediation
   message and the Posture Collector might need to send a response only
   to that one Posture Validator.  To handle this circumstance, PB-TNC
   provides delivery based on dynamic identifiers.

   When a Posture Broker Server loads a Posture Validator, it assigns it
   a Posture Validator ID.  Any PA messages sent by a Posture Validator
   include that Posture Validator's Posture Validator ID in the Posture
   Validator ID field of the PB-PA message.  A Posture Collector that
   receives such a message can send a message in response and request
   exclusive delivery to the Posture Validator identified by that
   Posture Validator ID.

   Dynamic identifiers avoid problems caused by the multicast nature of
   message types.  Multiple Posture Collectors or Posture Validators may
   be registered for the same message type, and this can cause confusion
   if they all respond and the software designer did not consider that
   possibility.  The dynamic identifier system allows more directed
   responses, but it does not work until at least one message has been
   received (so that the dynamic identifiers can be received).  Static
   identifiers were considered as another alternative but rejected
   because they result in a brittle system that only works with a




<span class="grey">Sahita, et al.               Standards Track                    [Page 6]</span></pre>
<hr class='noprint'/><!--NewPage--><pre class='newpage'><span id="page-7" ></span>
<span class="grey"><a href="./rfc5793">RFC 5793</a>                         PB-TNC                       March 2010</span>


   particular set of Posture Collectors and Posture Validators and
   causes problems if two Posture Collectors or Posture Validators with
   the same static identifier are installed.

<span class="h3"><a class="selflink" id="section-2.2" href="#section-2.2">2.2</a>.  Vendor IDs</span>

   In several places, PB-TNC needs to define a set of standard values
   but also allow vendor-specific extensions.  In each of these places
   (PB-TNC Message Types, PA Subtypes, Remediation Parameters Types, and
   Error Codes), the solution chosen was to preface the values with a
   vendor ID.  If a vendor ID is 0, the values in the next field are
   registered in an IANA registry and their meanings defined in an RFC.
   If a vendor ID is non-zero, the values in the next field are vendor
   specific and defined by the vendor whose SMI Private Enterprise
   Number matches the vendor ID.  Vendor-specific messages that are not
   understood by the recipient are ignored and skipped unless they have
   the NOSKIP flag set, in which case an error code is returned.

<span class="h3"><a class="selflink" id="section-2.3" href="#section-2.3">2.3</a>.  Efficiency</span>

   PB-TNC needs to work with low bandwidth transports and low power
   devices.  Therefore, a simple, compact format was chosen for the PB-
   TNC protocol: binary messages with a Type-Length-Value structure.

<span class="h2"><a class="selflink" id="section-3" href="#section-3">3</a>.  PB-TNC Protocol Description</span>

<span class="h3"><a class="selflink" id="section-3.1" href="#section-3.1">3.1</a>.  Protocol Overview</span>

   The PB-TNC protocol carries batches of PB messages between a Posture
   Broker Client and a Posture Broker Server.  It encapsulates PA
   messages and manages the NEA session.  It runs over a PT protocol.

   In order to work well over half-duplex PT protocols (such as those
   based on EAP [<a href="#ref-9" title="&quot;Extensible Authentication Protocol (EAP)&quot;">9</a>]), PB-TNC supports half-duplex protocol operation.
   In this mode, the Posture Broker Client and Posture Broker Server
   take turns sending a single batch of messages to each other.  While
   the half-duplex nature of PB-TNC could slow exchanges that require
   many round trips or bidirectional multimedia exchanges, this is not a
   problem in practice because endpoint assessments do not typically
   involve multimedia or a large number of round trips.  The benefit of
   working over half-duplex transports outweighs any limitations
   imposed.

   PB-TNC also supports full-duplex protocol operation so that PB-TNC
   exchanges can be re-initialized immediately when needed (e.g., if the
   Posture Broker Server policy changes or if the Posture Broker Client
   detects a suspicious event).




<span class="grey">Sahita, et al.               Standards Track                    [Page 7]</span></pre>
<hr class='noprint'/><!--NewPage--><pre class='newpage'><span id="page-8" ></span>
<span class="grey"><a href="./rfc5793">RFC 5793</a>                         PB-TNC                       March 2010</span>


   Each PB-TNC batch consists of a header followed by a sequence of PB-
   TNC messages.  Each PB-TNC message has a Type-Length-Value (TLV)
   format with a few flags.  The TLV format allows a recipient to skip
   messages that it does not understand.  The TLV format also provides a
   standard way to mark messages as mandatory to ensure interoperability
   between a Posture Broker Client and a Posture Broker Server.

   This specification defines certain standard PB-TNC message types.  It
   also permits vendors to define their own vendor-specific message
   types.  One of the most important standard PB-TNC message types is
   PB-PA.  A message with this type contains a PA message and various
   message routing information.  A Posture Broker Client or Posture
   Broker Server that receives such a message does not interpret the PA
   message within.  Instead, it delivers the PA message to the
   appropriate set of Posture Collectors or Posture Validators, as
   determined using the message routing information contained in the PB-
   PA message.

   A Posture Broker Server will often need to communicate with several
   Posture Broker Clients at once.  The reverse may also be true, as
   when an endpoint has multiple network interfaces connected to
   different networks.  Each connection between a Posture Broker Server
   and a Posture Broker Client is instantiated as a separate PB-TNC
   session.  There may be several simultaneous sessions between a single
   Posture Broker Server and Posture Broker Client, but this is unusual.

<span class="h3"><a class="selflink" id="section-3.2" href="#section-3.2">3.2</a>.  PB-TNC State Machine</span>

   Figure 1 illustrates the PB-TNC state machine, showing the set of
   states that a PB-TNC session can have and the possible transitions
   among these states.  The following paragraphs describe this state
   machine in more detail.



















<span class="grey">Sahita, et al.               Standards Track                    [Page 8]</span></pre>
<hr class='noprint'/><!--NewPage--><pre class='newpage'><span id="page-9" ></span>
<span class="grey"><a href="./rfc5793">RFC 5793</a>                         PB-TNC                       March 2010</span>


               Receive CRETRY        SRETRY
                    or SRETRY   +----------------+
                         +--+   |                |
                         v  |   v                |
                        +---------+  CRETRY  +---------+
              CDATA     | Server  |&lt;---------| Decided | CLOSE
           +-----------&gt;| Working |---------&gt;|         |-------+
           |            +---------+  RESULT  +---------+       |
           |                ^ |  |                             v
           |                | |  +----------------------&gt;=======
         ========           | |              CLOSE       " End "
         " Init "      CDATA| |SDATA                     =======
         ========           | |                          ^    ^
           |  |             | v                          |    |
           |  | SDATA   +---------+          CLOSE       |    |
           |  +--------&gt;| Client  |----------------------+    |
           |            | Working |                           |
           |            +---------+                           |
           |                |  ^                              |
           |                +--+                              |
           |            Receive CRETRY                        |
           |   CLOSE                                          |
           +--------------------------------------------------+

                         Figure 1: PB-TNC state machine

   In this diagram, states are indicated by rectangular boxes.  The
   initial and terminal states have double outlines (with = and ").
   State transitions are indicated by unidirectional arrows marked with
   the cause of the transition.

   Many transitions (CDATA, SDATA, CRETRY, SRETRY, and RESULT) are
   triggered by the transmission or reception of a PB-TNC batch of a
   particular type.  The type of a PB-TNC batch is indicated by the
   contents of the Batch Type field in the PB-TNC header for that batch.
   For brevity, this document says "a FOO batch" instead of "a PB-TNC
   batch whose Batch Type field contains FOO".  Other transitions are
   triggered by receiving a PB-TNC batch of a particular type (e.g.,
   Receive CRETRY).  The CLOSE transition may be triggered by sending or
   receiving a CLOSE batch but may also be triggered by termination of
   the underlying PT connection.

   A PB-TNC session starts in the Init state when the underlying
   transport protocol (PT) establishes a connection between a Posture
   Broker Client and a Posture Broker Server.  If the Posture Broker
   Client initiated the underlying transport session, it starts by
   sending a CDATA batch to the Posture Broker Server, thus causing a
   transition to the Server Working state.  If the Posture Broker Server



<span class="grey">Sahita, et al.               Standards Track                    [Page 9]</span></pre>
<hr class='noprint'/><!--NewPage--><pre class='newpage'><span id="page-10" ></span>
<span class="grey"><a href="./rfc5793">RFC 5793</a>                         PB-TNC                       March 2010</span>


   initiated the transport session, it starts by sending a PB-TNC batch
   of type SDATA to the Posture Broker Client, thus causing a transition
   to the Client Working state.

   The Posture Broker Client and Posture Broker Server may now alternate
   sending CDATA and SDATA batches to each other.  Only the Posture
   Broker Client can send a data batch when the session is in the Client
   Working state, and only the Posture Broker Server can send a data
   batch when the session is in the Server Working state.

   The most common way to end an exchange is for the Posture Broker
   Server to send a RESULT batch.  This causes a transition into the
   Decided state.  This is not a terminal state.  The PT session can
   remain open and another exchange can be initiated by having the
   Posture Broker Client send a CRETRY batch.  This can be useful when
   the Posture Broker Client (or more likely a Posture Collector)
   discovers a suspicious condition on the endpoint, for example.  If
   the underlying transport protocol (PT) supports full-duplex
   operation, the Posture Broker Server can also initiate another
   exchange from this state by sending a SRETRY batch.  This can be
   useful when the policy changes on the server, for example.

   Whether an SRETRY or CRETRY message or both are sent, the next state
   is the Server Working State.  From this state, the Posture Broker
   Server sends an SDATA batch and the new exchange begins.  The state
   transitions marked Receive CRETRY and Receive CRETRY or SRETRY
   indicate that it is permissible to receive such messages in the
   indicated states, generally when the Posture Broker Client sent a
   CRETRY message at roughly the same time as the Posture Broker Server
   decided to send an SRETRY.  In that case, a CRETRY message may be
   received while in the Server Working or Client Working state.  Also,
   an SRETRY message may be received while in the Server Working state.
   These messages are redundant and therefore ignored, as indicated by
   the relevant transitions, which don't cause a state change.

   The only terminal state is the End state.  This state is reached if
   the underlying PT connection closes.  This can be caused by an action
   of the Posture Broker Client or Posture Broker Server or it can be
   caused by some external factor, such as pulling the network plug.
   When possible, a CLOSE batch SHOULD be sent before the underlying PT
   connection is terminated.  However, there may be cases where the PT
   connection is closed without notice.  For example, a plug may be
   pulled, a software program may fail, or a Posture Broker Client or
   Posture Broker Server may be unable to send a CLOSE message due to
   half-duplex limitations in the underlying PT protocol.  In these
   cases, the Posture Broker Client and Posture Broker Server will
   generally receive some form of notification from the Posture
   Transport Client and Posture Transport Server that the PT connection



<span class="grey">Sahita, et al.               Standards Track                   [Page 10]</span></pre>
<hr class='noprint'/><!--NewPage--><pre class='newpage'><span id="page-11" ></span>
<span class="grey"><a href="./rfc5793">RFC 5793</a>                         PB-TNC                       March 2010</span>


   has been closed.  This notification can trigger the CLOSE transition.
   However, the notification interaction is not standardized since the
   vertical interfaces in the NEA Reference Model are not standardized.
   In any case, the reception of the CLOSE batch or notification of
   termination of the transport causes the transition to the End state.

   Note that a Posture Broker Client and Posture Broker Server may not
   always have exactly the same state for a given PB-TNC session.  For
   example, say that a session is in the Client Working state and the
   Posture Broker Client transmits a CDATA batch.  While this batch is
   in transit (transmitted by the Posture Broker Client but not yet
   received by the Posture Broker Server), the Posture Broker Client
   will think that the session is in Server Working state but the
   Posture Broker Server will think that the session is in Client
   Working state.  However, this is a temporary condition and does not
   cause problems in practice.  The only possible issue is that a
   Posture Broker Client or Posture Broker Server does not know whether
   the other party has received its message until it receives a response
   from the other party.

   If a half-duplex transport is used, note that the Posture Broker
   Server cannot send a SRETRY batch when the session is in the Decided
   state because the Posture Broker Server sent the most recent batch
   (the RESULT batch) and this would violate the half-duplex nature of
   the transport protocol.  Instead, a server that wishes to initiate a
   new exchange in the Decided state when a half-duplex transport is in
   use should close the PT connection without sending a CLOSE batch and
   start a new PB-TNC session.  This limitation does not exist when a
   full-duplex transport is used.

   The Posture Broker Server and Posture Broker Client MUST follow the
   state machine described in this section.

<span class="h3"><a class="selflink" id="section-3.3" href="#section-3.3">3.3</a>.  Layering on PT</span>

   PB-TNC batches are carried over protocol bindings of the PT protocol,
   which provides the interaction between a Posture Transport Client and
   a Posture Transport Server.  PB-TNC counts on PT to provide a secure
   transport.  In particular, PT MUST support mutual authentication of
   the Posture Transport Client and the Posture Transport Server,
   confidentiality and integrity protection for PB-TNC batches, and
   protection against replay attacks.  PB-TNC is unaware of the
   underlying transport protocols being used.  PB-TNC operates directly
   on PT; no further layer of PB-TNC is expected.







<span class="grey">Sahita, et al.               Standards Track                   [Page 11]</span></pre>
<hr class='noprint'/><!--NewPage--><pre class='newpage'><span id="page-12" ></span>
<span class="grey"><a href="./rfc5793">RFC 5793</a>                         PB-TNC                       March 2010</span>


<span class="h4"><a class="selflink" id="section-3.3.1" href="#section-3.3.1">3.3.1</a>.  Posture Transport (PT) Protocol Requirements Addendum</span>

   <a href="./rfc5209">RFC 5209</a> [<a href="#ref-8" title="&quot;Network Endpoint Assessment (NEA): Overview and Requirements&quot;">8</a>] describes normative requirements for the Posture
   Transport protocol.  This section specifies additional requirements
   for the Posture Transport protocol.  Candidate Posture Transport
   protocols must indicate conformance to requirements specified in this
   section as well as <a href="./rfc5209#section-7.4">section&nbsp;7.4 of RFC 5209</a>.

   The additional requirements for candidate PT protocols are:

   PT-6 The PT protocol MUST be connection oriented; it MUST support
        confirmed initiation and close down.

   PT-7 The PT protocol MUST be able to carry binary data.

   PT-8 The PT protocol MUST provide mechanisms for flow control and
        congestion control.

   PT-9 PT protocol specifications MUST describe the capabilities that
        they provide for and limitations that they impose on the PB
        protocol (e.g., half/full duplex, maximum message size).

<span class="h3"><a class="selflink" id="section-3.4" href="#section-3.4">3.4</a>.  Example of PB-TNC Encapsulation</span>

   This section shows how PA messages can be carried inside a PB-TNC
   batch that is inside a PT protocol.

   Within the PT protocol, the PB-TNC header is packaged next, followed
   by two PB-PA messages that contain PA messages meant for the Posture
   Collectors and Posture Validators on the platform.

      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
      |                           PT Protocol                         |
      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
      |                          PB-TNC Header                        |
      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
      |                           PB-PA Message                       |
      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
      |                           PB-PA Message                       |
      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

              Figure 2: Example of PB-TNC message encapsulation

   This figure is conceptual, of course, and not an exact byte-for-byte
   replica.






<span class="grey">Sahita, et al.               Standards Track                   [Page 12]</span></pre>
<hr class='noprint'/><!--NewPage--><pre class='newpage'><span id="page-13" ></span>
<span class="grey"><a href="./rfc5793">RFC 5793</a>                         PB-TNC                       March 2010</span>


<span class="h2"><a class="selflink" id="section-4" href="#section-4">4</a>.  PB-TNC Protocol Specification</span>

   This section defines the syntax and semantics of the PB-TNC protocol
   fields.  If a Posture Broker Client or Posture Broker Server receives
   a batch that violates the requirements of this specification, it MUST
   respond by sending a fatal Invalid Parameter error in a CLOSE batch
   unless this document specifies otherwise.

<span class="h3"><a class="selflink" id="section-4.1" href="#section-4.1">4.1</a>.  PB-TNC Header</span>

   Every PB-TNC batch MUST start with the following header.  A PB-TNC
   batch MUST contain only one instance of this header followed by zero
   or more PB-TNC messages.  The PB-TNC messages are defined in
   subsequent sections of this specification.

       0                   1                   2                   3
       0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
      |    Version    |D|     Reserved                        | B-Type|
      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
      |                       Batch Length                            |
      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

   Version (8 bits)

      This field indicates the version of the format for the PB-TNC
      message.  This version is intended to allow for evolution of the
      PB-TNC protocol in a manner that can easily be detected by message
      recipients.

      This field MUST be set to 2 when the batch conforms to this
      specification.  Later versions of PB-TNC may define other values
      for this field.  The values 0x00, 0x09, 0x0a, 0x0d, 0x20, and 0x3c
      are reserved and cannot be used for any version of PB-TNC to
      ensure that PB-TNC can be easily distinguished from earlier
      posture broker protocols already in use.

      If a Posture Broker Client or Posture Broker Server receives a
      Version value that it does not support, it MUST respond with a PB-
      TNC batch with batch type CLOSE that contains only a fatal Version
      Not Supported error code and whose Version header field has the
      value 2.  Implementations responding to a PB-TNC message
      containing a supported version MUST use the same Version number to
      minimize the risk of version incompatibility.  PB-TNC message
      initiators that support multiple PB-TNC protocol versions SHOULD
      be able to alter which version of PB-TNC message they send based
      on prior message exchanges with a particular peer Posture Broker
      Client or Posture Broker Server.



<span class="grey">Sahita, et al.               Standards Track                   [Page 13]</span></pre>
<hr class='noprint'/><!--NewPage--><pre class='newpage'><span id="page-14" ></span>
<span class="grey"><a href="./rfc5793">RFC 5793</a>                         PB-TNC                       March 2010</span>


   Directionality (D) (1 bit)

      When a Posture Broker Client is sending this message, the
      Directionality bit MUST be set to 0.  When a Posture Broker Server
      is sending this message, the Directionality bit MUST be set to 1.
      This helps avoid any situation where two Posture Broker Clients or
      two Posture Broker Servers engage in a dialog.  It also helps with
      debugging.

   Reserved (19 bits)

      This field is reserved.  For this version of this specification,
      it MUST be set to 0 on transmission and ignored on reception.
      Future versions of this specification may allow senders to set
      some of these bits and recipients to interpret them.

   B-Type (Batch Type) (4 bits)

      This field is used to drive the state machine described in <a href="#section-3.2">section</a>
      <a href="#section-3.2">3.2</a>.  This field MUST have one of the values from the following
      table.  If any other value is received, the recipient MUST ignore
      the contents of the batch and send a fatal Invalid Parameter error
      code in a CLOSE batch.  If the value received is not permitted for
      the current state, according to the state machine in <a href="#section-3.2">section 3.2</a>.,
      the recipient MUST ignore the contents of the batch and send a
      fatal Unexpected Batch Type error code in a CLOSE batch.

























<span class="grey">Sahita, et al.               Standards Track                   [Page 14]</span></pre>
<hr class='noprint'/><!--NewPage--><pre class='newpage'><span id="page-15" ></span>
<span class="grey"><a href="./rfc5793">RFC 5793</a>                         PB-TNC                       March 2010</span>


      Number   Name     Definition
      ------   ----     ----------

      1        CDATA    The Posture Broker Client may send a batch with
                        this Batch Type to convey messages to the
                        Posture Broker Server.  A Posture Broker Server
                        MUST NOT send this Batch Type.  A CDATA batch
                        may be empty (contain no messages) if the
                        Posture Broker Client has nothing to send.

      2        SDATA    The Posture Broker Server may send a batch with
                        this Batch Type to convey messages to the
                        Posture Broker Client.  A Posture Broker Client
                        MUST NOT send this Batch Type.  An SDATA batch
                        may be empty (contain no messages) if the
                        Posture Broker Server has nothing to send.

      3        RESULT   The Posture Broker Server may send a batch with
                        this Batch Type to indicate that it has
                        completed its evaluation.  The batch MUST
                        include a PB-Assessment-Result message and MAY
                        include a PB-Access-Recommendation message.

      4        CRETRY   The Posture Broker Client may send a batch with
                        this Batch Type to indicate that it wishes to
                        restart an exchange.  A Posture Broker Server
                        MUST NOT send this Batch Type.  A CRETRY batch
                        may be empty (contain no messages) if the
                        Posture Broker Client has nothing else to send.

      5        SRETRY  The Posture Broker Server may send a batch with
                       this Batch Type to indicate that it wishes to
                       restart the exchange.  A Posture Broker Client
                       MUST NOT send this Batch Type.  A SRETRY batch
                       may be empty (contain no messages) if the
                       Posture Broker Server has nothing else to send.

      6        CLOSE   The Posture Broker Server or Posture Broker
                       Client may send a batch with this Batch Type to
                       indicate that it is about to terminate the
                       underlying PT connection.  A CLOSE batch may be
                       empty (contain no messages) if there is nothing
                       to send.  However, if the termination is due to a
                       fatal error, then the CLOSE batch MUST contain a
                       PB-Error message.






<span class="grey">Sahita, et al.               Standards Track                   [Page 15]</span></pre>
<hr class='noprint'/><!--NewPage--><pre class='newpage'><span id="page-16" ></span>
<span class="grey"><a href="./rfc5793">RFC 5793</a>                         PB-TNC                       March 2010</span>


   Batch Length (32 bits)

      This length field contains the size of the full PB-TNC batch in
      octets.  This length includes the PB-TNC header and all the PB-TNC
      messages in the batch.  In other words, it includes the entire
      contents of the batch.  This field MUST contain at least the value
      8 for the fixed-length fields in this header.  Any Posture Broker
      Client or Posture Broker Server that receives a PB-TNC message
      with a PB-TNC Message Length field whose value is less than 8 MUST
      respond with a fatal Invalid Parameter error code in a CLOSE
      batch.

<span class="h3"><a class="selflink" id="section-4.2" href="#section-4.2">4.2</a>.  PB-TNC Message</span>

   All PB-TNC messages have the same overall structure, which is
   described in this section.  Of course, the format and semantics of
   the PB-TNC Message Value field will vary, depending on the values of
   the PB-TNC Vendor ID and PB-TNC Message Type fields.

       0                   1                   2                   3
       0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
      |     Flags     |               PB-TNC Vendor ID                |
      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
      |                       PB-TNC Message Type                     |
      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
      |                      PB-TNC Message Length                    |
      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
      |               PB-TNC Message Value (Variable Length)          |
      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

   Flags (8 bits)

      This field defines flags impacting the processing of this message.

      Bit 0 of this Flags field (the most significant bit) is known as
      the NOSKIP flag.  If this flag is cleared (value 0), then the
      recipient (a Posture Broker Client or Posture Broker Server) may
      skip (ignore) this message if the message type is not understood
      or the recipient cannot or will not process the message as
      required in the definition of that message.  If this flag is set
      (value 1), then recipients MUST NOT skip this attribute.

      This flag does not mean that all recipients must support this
      message.  Instead, any recipient that receives a message with this
      flag set to 1 but cannot or will not process it as required MUST
      NOT act on any part of the PB-TNC batch.  Instead, the recipient
      MUST respond with a fatal Unsupported Mandatory Message error code



<span class="grey">Sahita, et al.               Standards Track                   [Page 16]</span></pre>
<hr class='noprint'/><!--NewPage--><pre class='newpage'><span id="page-17" ></span>
<span class="grey"><a href="./rfc5793">RFC 5793</a>                         PB-TNC                       March 2010</span>


      in a CLOSE batch.  In order to avoid taking action on some
      messages in a batch only to later find an unsupported NOSKIP
      flagged message, recipients of a PB-TNC batch might choose to scan
      all of the messages in the batch prior to acting upon any of the
      messages, checking to determine whether one of them is an
      unsupported message with the NOSKIP flag set.

      The other bits in this Flags field are reserved.  For this version
      of PB-TNC, they MUST be set to 0 on transmission and ignored on
      reception.

   PB-TNC Vendor ID (24 bits)

      The PB-TNC Vendor ID field identifies a vendor by using the SMI
      Private Enterprise Number (PEN).  Any organization can receive its
      own unique PEN from IANA, the Internet Assigned Numbers Authority.
      This Vendor ID qualifies the PB-TNC Message Type field so that
      each vendor has 2^32-1 separate message types available for their
      use.

      Message types standardized by the IETF use zero (0) in this field.
      The Vendor ID 0xffffff is reserved.  Posture Broker Clients and
      Posture Broker Servers MUST NOT send messages in which the Vendor
      ID has this reserved value (0xffffff).  If a Posture Broker Client
      or Posture Broker Server receives a message in which the PB-TNC
      Vendor ID has this reserved value (0xffffff), it MUST respond with
      a fatal Invalid Parameter error code in a CLOSE batch.

   PB-TNC Message Type (32 bits)

      The PB-TNC Message Type field identifies the type of the PB-TNC
      message contained in the PB-TNC Message Value field.  The PB-TNC
      message type 0xffffffff is reserved.  Posture Broker Clients and
      Posture Broker Servers MUST NOT send messages in which the PB-TNC
      Message Type field has this reserved value (0xffffffff).  If a
      Posture Broker Client or Posture Broker Server receives a message
      in which the PB-TNC Message Type field has this reserved value
      (0xffffffff), it MUST respond with a fatal Invalid Parameter error
      code in a CLOSE batch.  Unless otherwise prohibited in the
      definition of a particular PB-TNC message type (e.g., PB-Language-
      Preference), a single PB-TNC batch may contain multiple messages
      with the same message type and/or vendor ID.

      The IETF and any other organization with a PEN can define 2^32-1
      unique PB-TNC message types, as long as the organization's PEN is
      placed in the PB-TNC Vendor ID field of the message.  Since the
      PB-TNC message type is qualified by the vendor ID, there is no




<span class="grey">Sahita, et al.               Standards Track                   [Page 17]</span></pre>
<hr class='noprint'/><!--NewPage--><pre class='newpage'><span id="page-18" ></span>
<span class="grey"><a href="./rfc5793">RFC 5793</a>                         PB-TNC                       March 2010</span>


      risk of conflicts as long as each organization uses its own PEN
      for the vendor ID and manages its own set of 2^32-1 message type
      values.

      This document defines certain PB-TNC message types that, when used
      with the IETF SMI PEN (0), have standard meanings.  These are
      known as IETF Standard PB-TNC Message Types.  Some of these PB-TNC
      message types are mandatory and therefore MUST be implemented by
      all Posture Broker Client and Posture Broker Server
      implementations that claim compliance with this specification.
      For details on which PB-TNC message types are mandatory, see the
      description of these message types later in <a href="#section-4">section 4</a>.

      IANA maintains a registry of PB-TNC message types.  Entries in
      this registry are added by Expert Review with Specification
      Required, following the guidelines in <a href="#section-6.1">section 6.1</a>.

      New vendor-specific PB-TNC message types (those used with a non-
      zero PB-TNC vendor ID) may be defined and employed by vendors
      without IETF or IANA involvement.  However, Posture Broker Clients
      and Posture Broker Servers MUST NOT require support for particular
      vendor-specific PB-TNC message types and MUST interoperate with
      other parties despite any differences in the set of vendor-
      specific PB-TNC message types supported (although they MAY permit
      administrators to configure them to require support for specific
      PB-TNC message types).

      Note that the PB-TNC Message Type field is completely separate
      from the PA Subtype field.  The same value (e.g., 0) may have
      different meanings as a PB-TNC message type and as a PA subtype.

   PB-TNC Message Length (32 bits)

      This field specifies the length of this PB-TNC message in octets.
      It includes this header (the fields Flags, PB-TNC Vendor ID, PB-
      TNC Message Type, and PB-TNC Message Length).  Therefore, this
      value MUST always be at least 12.  Any Posture Broker Client or
      Posture Broker Server that receives a message with a PB-TNC
      Message Length field whose value is less than 12 MUST respond with
      a fatal Invalid Parameter error code in a CLOSE batch.

   PB-TNC Message Value (variable length)

      The syntax and semantics of this field vary, depending on the
      values in the PB-TNC Vendor ID and PB-TNC Message Type fields.
      The syntax and semantics of several standard messages are defined
      in subsequent sections of this specification.




<span class="grey">Sahita, et al.               Standards Track                   [Page 18]</span></pre>
<hr class='noprint'/><!--NewPage--><pre class='newpage'><span id="page-19" ></span>
<span class="grey"><a href="./rfc5793">RFC 5793</a>                         PB-TNC                       March 2010</span>


<span class="h3"><a class="selflink" id="section-4.3" href="#section-4.3">4.3</a>.  IETF Standard PB-TNC Message Types</span>

   The following table provides a reference list with brief descriptions
   of the IETF Standard PB-TNC Message Types defined in this
   specification.  These PB-TNC message types must be used with a PB-TNC
   vendor ID of zero (0).  If these PB-TNC message type values are used
   with a different PB-TNC vendor ID, they have a completely different
   meaning that is not defined in this specification.

   For more details on these message types, see the remainder of <a href="#section-4">section</a>
   <a href="#section-4">4</a>.  For IETF Standard PA Subtypes (which are completely different
   from PB-TNC message types), please refer to the PA-TNC specification
   [<a href="#ref-10" title="&quot;PA-TNC: A Posture Attribute (PA) Protocol Compatible with Trusted Network Connect (TNC)&quot;">10</a>].

   Message Type   Definition
   ------------   ----------
   0              PB-Experimental - reserved for experimental use
   1              PB-PA - contains a PA message
   2              PB-Assessment-Result - the overall assessment result
                  computed by the Posture Broker Server
   3              PB-Access-Recommendation - includes Posture Broker
                  Server access recommendation
   4              PB-Remediation-Parameters - includes Posture Broker
                  Server remediation parameters
   5              PB-Error - error indicator
   6              PB-Language-Preference - sender's preferred
                  language(s) for human-readable strings
   7              PB-Reason-String - string explaining reason for
                  Posture Broker Server access recommendation

<span class="h3"><a class="selflink" id="section-4.4" href="#section-4.4">4.4</a>.  PB-Experimental</span>

   The PB-Experimental PB-TNC message type is a PB-TNC message type
   (value 0) that has been set aside for experimental purposes.  It may
   be used to test code or for other experimental purposes.  It MUST NOT
   be used in a production environment or in a product.  This meaning
   for this PB-TNC message type only applies if the PB-TNC Vendor ID
   field in the PB-TNC Message Header contains the value zero (0).  If a
   different Vendor ID is contained in that field, the PB-TNC message
   type 0 has a completely different meaning not defined in this
   specification.

   The contents of the PB-TNC Message Length and PB-TNC Message Value
   fields for this PB-TNC message type are not specified.  They may have
   almost any value, depending on what experiments are being conducted.
   Similarly, the Flags field for this message may have the NOSKIP bit
   set or cleared, depending on what experiments are being conducted.
   However, note that the PB-TNC Message Length field must have a value



<span class="grey">Sahita, et al.               Standards Track                   [Page 19]</span></pre>
<hr class='noprint'/><!--NewPage--><pre class='newpage'><span id="page-20" ></span>
<span class="grey"><a href="./rfc5793">RFC 5793</a>                         PB-TNC                       March 2010</span>


   of at least 12 since that is the total of the length of the fixed-
   length fields at the start of the PB-TNC message (the fields Flags,
   PB-TNC Vendor ID, PB-TNC Message Type, and PB-TNC Message Length).
   Any Posture Broker Client or Posture Broker Server that receives a
   message with a PB-TNC Message Length field whose value is invalid
   MUST respond with a fatal Invalid Parameter error code in a CLOSE
   batch.

   A Posture Broker Client or Posture Broker Server implementation
   intended for production use MUST NOT send a message with this Message
   Type with the value zero (0) as the vendor ID.  If it receives a
   message with this message type and with the value zero (0) as the
   vendor ID, it MUST ignore the message unless the NOSKIP bit is set,
   in which case it MUST respond with a fatal Unsupported Mandatory
   Message error code in a CLOSE batch.

<span class="h3"><a class="selflink" id="section-4.5" href="#section-4.5">4.5</a>.  PB-PA</span>

   The PB-TNC message type named PB-PA (value 1) contains one PA
   message.  Many batches will contain several PB-PA messages, but some
   batches may not contain any messages of this type.

   All Posture Broker Client and Posture Broker Server implementations
   MUST implement support for this PB-TNC message type.  Generally, this
   support will consist of forwarding the enclosed PA message to the
   appropriate Posture Collectors and Posture Validators.  Specific
   requirements are contained later in the description of this message
   type.

   The type of the PA message contained in a PB-PA message is indicated
   by the PA Message Vendor ID and PA Subtype fields, as described later
   in this section.  The PA-TNC specification [<a href="#ref-10" title="&quot;PA-TNC: A Posture Attribute (PA) Protocol Compatible with Trusted Network Connect (TNC)&quot;">10</a>] describes several
   standard PA message types that can be identified by the PA Message
   Vendor ID and PA Subtype values listed in the PA-TNC specification.
   Other PA message types may also be defined, as described in the
   description of the PA Subtype field later in this section.

   The NOSKIP flag in the PB-TNC Message Header MUST be set for this
   message type.  Any Posture Broker Client or Posture Broker Server
   that receives a PB-PA message with the NOSKIP flag not set MUST
   ignore the message and MUST respond with a fatal Invalid Parameter
   error code in a CLOSE batch.

   For the PB-PA message type, the PB-TNC Vendor ID field MUST contain
   the value zero (0) and the PB-TNC Message Type field MUST contain 1.
   If a non-zero value is contained in the PB-TNC Vendor ID field,
   message type 1 has a completely different meaning not defined in this
   specification.



<span class="grey">Sahita, et al.               Standards Track                   [Page 20]</span></pre>
<hr class='noprint'/><!--NewPage--><pre class='newpage'><span id="page-21" ></span>
<span class="grey"><a href="./rfc5793">RFC 5793</a>                         PB-TNC                       March 2010</span>


   The PB-TNC Message Length field MUST contain the length of the entire
   PB-TNC message, including the fixed-length fields at the start of the
   PB-TNC message (the fields Flags, PB-TNC Vendor ID, PB-TNC Message
   Type, and PB-TNC Message Length), the fixed-length fields listed
   below (Flags, PA Message Vendor ID, PA Subtype, Posture Collector
   Identifier, and Posture Validator Identifier), and the PA Message
   Body.  Since the PA Message Body is variable length, the value in the
   PB-TNC Message Length field will vary also.  However, it MUST always
   be at least 24 to cover the fixed-length fields listed in the
   preceding sentences.  Any Posture Broker Client or Posture Broker
   Server that receives a PB-PA message with a PB-TNC Message Length
   field that has an invalid value MUST respond with a fatal Invalid
   Parameter error code in a CLOSE batch.

   The following diagram illustrates the format and contents of the PB-
   TNC Message Value field for this message type.  The text after this
   diagram describes the fields shown here.

       0                   1                   2                   3
       0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
      |    Flags      |               PA Message Vendor ID            |
      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
      |                           PA Subtype                          |
      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
      |  Posture Collector Identifier | Posture Validator Identifier  |
      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
      |                 PA Message Body (Variable Length)             |
      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

   Flags (8 bits)

      This field contains flags relating to the PA message.

      Bit 0 of this flags field (the most significant bit) is known as
      the EXCL flag (for exclusive).  If the EXCL bit is cleared (value
      0), the Posture Broker Client or Posture Broker Server that
      receives this PB-TNC message SHOULD deliver the PA message
      contained in this PB-TNC message to all Posture Collectors or
      Posture Validators that have expressed an interest in PA messages
      with this PA Message Vendor ID and PA subtype.  If a Posture
      Broker Client receives a message with the EXCL flag set (value 1),
      the Posture Broker Client SHOULD deliver the PA message contained
      in this PB-TNC message only to the Posture Collector identified by
      the Posture Collector Identifier field.  However, if the
      identified Posture Collector has not expressed an interest in PA
      messages with this PA Message Vendor ID and PA subtype, the PA




<span class="grey">Sahita, et al.               Standards Track                   [Page 21]</span></pre>
<hr class='noprint'/><!--NewPage--><pre class='newpage'><span id="page-22" ></span>
<span class="grey"><a href="./rfc5793">RFC 5793</a>                         PB-TNC                       March 2010</span>


      message should be silently discarded.  Analogous requirements
      apply to a Posture Broker Server that receives a message with the
      EXCL flag set.

      The EXCL bit allows, for example, a Posture Validator to handle
      the circumstance where there are two Posture Collectors on the
      endpoint that are interested in a particular kind of PA messages
      and the Posture Validator has remediation instructions that only
      apply to one of those Posture Collectors.

      The other bits in this Flags field are reserved.  For this version
      of PB-TNC, they MUST be set to 0 on transmission and ignored on
      reception.

   PA Message Vendor ID (24 bits)

      The PA Message Vendor ID field identifies a vendor by using the
      SMI Private Enterprise Number (PEN).  Any organization can receive
      its own unique PEN from IANA, the Internet Assigned Numbers
      Authority.  The PA Message Vendor ID qualifies the PA Subtype
      field so that each vendor has 2^32-1 separate PA subtypes
      available for its use.  PA subtypes standardized by the IETF are
      always used with a PA Message Vendor ID of the value zero (0) in
      this field.  The PA Message Vendor ID 0xffffff is reserved.  A
      Posture Broker Client or Posture Broker Server MUST NOT send
      messages in which the PA Message Vendor ID field has this reserved
      value (0xffffff).  If a Posture Broker Client or Posture Broker
      Server receives a message in which the PA Message Vendor ID has
      this reserved value (0xffffff), it MUST respond with a fatal
      Invalid Parameter error code in a CLOSE batch.

   PA Subtype (32 bits)

      The PA Subtype field identifies the type of the PA message
      contained in the PA Message Body field.  The PA subtype 0xffffffff
      is reserved.  A Posture Broker Client or Posture Broker Server
      MUST NOT send messages in which the PA Subtype field has this
      reserved value (0xffffffff).  If a Posture Broker Client or
      Posture Broker Server receives a message in which the PA Subtype
      has this reserved value (0xffffffff), it MUST respond with a fatal
      Invalid Parameter error code in a CLOSE batch.  A Posture Broker
      Client or Posture Broker Server MUST support having multiple PA
      messages in a single PB-TNC batch that have the same PA subtype
      and/or PA Message Vendor ID.

      IANA maintains a registry of PA subtypes.  Entries in this
      registry are added by Expert Review with Specification Required,
      following the guidelines in <a href="#section-6.1">section 6.1</a>.  No PA subtypes are



<span class="grey">Sahita, et al.               Standards Track                   [Page 22]</span></pre>
<hr class='noprint'/><!--NewPage--><pre class='newpage'><span id="page-23" ></span>
<span class="grey"><a href="./rfc5793">RFC 5793</a>                         PB-TNC                       March 2010</span>


      defined in this specification.  Definitions of IETF Standard PA
      Subtypes are contained in the PA-TNC specification [<a href="#ref-10" title="&quot;PA-TNC: A Posture Attribute (PA) Protocol Compatible with Trusted Network Connect (TNC)&quot;">10</a>] and other
      specifications.  IETF Standard PA Subtypes are always used with a
      PA Message Vendor ID of zero (0).

      New vendor-specific PA subtypes (those used with a non-zero PA
      Message Vendor ID) may be defined and employed by vendors without
      IETF or IANA involvement.  However, Posture Broker Clients and
      Posture Broker Servers MUST NOT require support for particular
      vendor-specific PA subtypes and MUST interoperate with other
      parties despite any differences in the set of vendor-specific PA
      subtypes supported (although they MAY permit administrators to
      configure them to require support for specific PA subtypes).

      Note that the PB-TNC Message Type field is completely separate
      from the PA Subtype field.  The same value (e.g., 0) may have
      different meanings as a PB-TNC message type and as a PA subtype.

   Posture Collector Identifier (16 bits)

      The Posture Collector Identifier field contains the identifier of
      the Posture Collector associated with this PA message.

      The Posture Broker Client is responsible for assigning one or more
      Posture Collector Identifier values (but not 0xffff) to each
      Posture Collector involved in a message exchange.  Multiple
      Posture Collector identifiers are required for appropriate
      correlation in cases where there are multiple components of the
      same type handled by a single Posture Collector, e.g., an endpoint
      with two VPN client implementations handled by a single VPN
      Posture Collector.  Please refer to <a href="#section-3.3">section 3.3</a> of the PA-TNC
      specification for an example that illustrates the use of multiple
      Posture Collector Identifiers.  The Posture Collector Identifier
      value(s) assigned to a Posture Collector by a Posture Broker
      Client MUST NOT change during the course of a PT session.  This
      identifier is used to identify a unique Posture Collector
      communicating with the Posture Broker Client on the endpoint
      during a NEA exchange, and is used by the Posture Validator to
      send response attributes to a specific Posture Collector component
      if required.

      When a Posture Broker Server sets the EXCL flag for a PA message,
      the Posture Broker Server MUST set the Posture Collector
      Identifier field to the identifier of the Posture Collector that
      should receive the PA message.  If the EXCL flag is not set, a
      Posture Broker Server MAY still set the Posture Collector
      Identifier value for PA messages that it sends to indicate that
      the PA message is intended as a response to a message sent by the



<span class="grey">Sahita, et al.               Standards Track                   [Page 23]</span></pre>
<hr class='noprint'/><!--NewPage--><pre class='newpage'><span id="page-24" ></span>
<span class="grey"><a href="./rfc5793">RFC 5793</a>                         PB-TNC                       March 2010</span>


      Posture Collector associated with the specified Posture Collector
      Identifier.  If the Posture Broker Server does not wish to
      indicate any Posture Collector in this manner, it SHOULD set this
      field to the reserved value 0xffff.

   Posture Validator Identifier (16 bits)

      The Posture Validator Identifier field contains the identifier of
      the Posture Validator associated with this PA message.

      The Posture Broker Server MUST assign a unique Posture Validator
      Identifier value (but not 0xffff) to each Posture Validator
      involved in a message exchange and include this Posture Validator
      identifier in this field for any PA messages sent by that Posture
      Validator.  The Posture Validator Identifier value assigned to a
      Posture Validator by a Posture Broker Server MUST NOT change
      during the course of a PT session.  This identifier is used to
      identify a unique Posture Validator communicating with the Posture
      Broker Server endpoint during a NEA exchange, and is used by the
      Posture Collector to send attributes to a specific Posture
      Validator if required.

      When a Posture Broker Client sets the EXCL flag for a PA message,
      the Posture Broker Client MUST set the Posture Validator
      Identifier field to the identifier of the Posture Validator that
      should receive the PA message.  If the EXCL flag is not set, a
      Posture Broker Client MAY still set the Posture Validator
      Identifier value for PA messages that it sends to indicate that
      the PA message is intended as a response to a message sent by the
      Posture Validator associated with the specified Posture Validator
      Identifier.  If the Posture Broker Client does not wish to
      indicate any Posture Validator in this manner, it SHOULD set this
      field to the reserved value 0xffff.

   PA Message Body (variable length)

      The PA Message Body field contains the body of the PA message that
      is being carried in this PB-TNC message.  The length of this field
      can be determined by subtracting the length of the fixed-length
      fields at the start of the PB-TNC message (the fields Flags, PB-
      TNC Vendor ID, PB-TNC Message Type, and PB-TNC Message Length) and
      the fixed-length fields at the start of the PB-PA message (Flags,
      PA Message Vendor ID, PA Subtype, Posture Collector Identifier,
      and Posture Validator Identifier) from the message length
      contained in the PB-TNC Message Length field.  The length of these
      fixed-length fields is 24 octets.  Therefore, any Posture Broker
      Client or Posture Broker Server that receives a PB-PA message with




<span class="grey">Sahita, et al.               Standards Track                   [Page 24]</span></pre>
<hr class='noprint'/><!--NewPage--><pre class='newpage'><span id="page-25" ></span>
<span class="grey"><a href="./rfc5793">RFC 5793</a>                         PB-TNC                       March 2010</span>


      a PB-TNC Message Length field whose value is less than 24 MUST
      respond with a fatal Invalid Parameter error code in a CLOSE
      batch.

<span class="h3"><a class="selflink" id="section-4.6" href="#section-4.6">4.6</a>.  PB-Assessment-Result</span>

   The PB-TNC message type named PB-Assessment-Result (value 2) is used
   by the Posture Broker Server to provide the assessment result after
   the Posture Broker Server has completed the assessment of the
   endpoint.  The Posture Broker Server will typically compute the
   assessment result as a cumulative of the individual assessment
   results received from the various Posture Validators; the algorithm
   for computation of assessment result at the Posture Broker layer is
   implementation specific and can also change based on policies in a
   specific deployment.  The Posture Broker Server MUST include one
   message of this type in any batch of type RESULT and MUST NOT include
   a message of this type in any other type of batch.  The Posture
   Broker Client MUST NOT send a PB-TNC message with this message type.
   If a Posture Broker Server receives a PB-TNC message with this
   message type, it MUST respond with a fatal Invalid Parameter error in
   a CLOSE batch.  The Posture Broker Client MUST implement and process
   this message and MUST ignore any message with this message type that
   is not part of a batch of type RESULT.

   The NOSKIP flag in the PB-TNC Message Header MUST be set for this
   message type.  The PB-TNC Vendor ID field MUST contain the value zero
   (0) and the PB-TNC Message Type field MUST contain 2.  If a non-zero
   value is contained in the PB-TNC Vendor ID field, message type 2 has
   a completely different meaning not defined in this specification.
   The PB-TNC Message Length field MUST contain the value 16 since that
   is the total of the length of the fixed-length fields at the start of
   the PB-TNC message (the fields Flags, PB-TNC Vendor ID, PB-TNC
   Message Type, and PB-TNC Message Length) along with the Assessment
   Result field described below.  Any Posture Broker Client or Posture
   Broker Server that receives a PB-Assessment-Result message with a PB-
   TNC Message Length field that does not have a value of 16 MUST
   respond with a fatal Invalid Parameter error code in a CLOSE batch.

   The following diagram illustrates the format and contents of the PB-
   TNC Message Value field for this message type.  The text after this
   diagram describes the fields shown here.

                           1                   2                   3
       0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
      |                       Assessment Result                       |
      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+




<span class="grey">Sahita, et al.               Standards Track                   [Page 25]</span></pre>
<hr class='noprint'/><!--NewPage--><pre class='newpage'><span id="page-26" ></span>
<span class="grey"><a href="./rfc5793">RFC 5793</a>                         PB-TNC                       March 2010</span>


   Assessment Result

      This 32-bit field MUST contain one of the following values

      Value   Description
      -----   -----------
      0       Posture Broker Server assessed the endpoint to be
              compliant with policy.

      1       Posture Broker Server assessed the endpoint to be non-
              compliant with policy but the difference from compliance
              was minor.

      2       Posture Broker Server assessed the endpoint to be non-
              compliant with policy and the assessed difference from
              compliance was very significant.

      3       Posture Broker Server was unable to determine policy
              compliance due to an error.

      4       Posture Broker Server was unable to determine whether the
              assessed endpoint is compliant with policy based on the
              attributes provided by endpoint.

      If a Posture Broker Client receives an Assessment Result value
      other than the five values described above, it MUST respond with a
      fatal Invalid Parameter error in a CLOSE batch.  Other values may
      be defined in future versions of PB-TNC but only if the PB-TNC
      version number is changed.  Therefore, there is no need for an
      IANA registry for Assessment Result values.

<span class="h3"><a class="selflink" id="section-4.7" href="#section-4.7">4.7</a>.  PB-Access-Recommendation</span>

   The PB-TNC message type named PB-Access-Recommendation (value 3) is
   used by the Posture Broker Server to provide an access recommendation
   after the Posture Broker Server has completed some assessment of the
   endpoint.  The PB-Assessment-Result and the PB-Access-Recommendation
   attribute together constitute the global assessment decision for an
   endpoint.  The PB-Access-Recommendation is not authoritative, and the
   network and host-based access control systems would typically use
   additional information to determine the network access that is
   granted to the endpoint.  The Posture Broker Server MAY include one
   message of this type in any batch of type RESULT and MUST NOT include
   a message of this type in any other type of batch.  Posture Broker
   Clients MUST NOT send a PB-TNC message with this message type.  If a
   Posture Broker Server receives a PB-TNC message with this message
   type, it MUST respond with a fatal Invalid Parameter error in a CLOSE




<span class="grey">Sahita, et al.               Standards Track                   [Page 26]</span></pre>
<hr class='noprint'/><!--NewPage--><pre class='newpage'><span id="page-27" ></span>
<span class="grey"><a href="./rfc5793">RFC 5793</a>                         PB-TNC                       March 2010</span>


   batch.  The Posture Broker Client MUST implement and process this
   message and MUST ignore any message with this message type that is
   not part of a batch of type RESULT.

   The NOSKIP flag in the PB-TNC Message Header MUST NOT be set for this
   message type.  Any Posture Broker Client or Posture Broker Server
   that receives a PB-Access-Recommendation message with the NOSKIP flag
   set MUST ignore the message and MUST respond with a fatal Invalid
   Parameter error code in a CLOSE batch.  The PB-TNC Vendor ID field
   MUST contain the value zero (0) and the PB-TNC Message Type field
   MUST contain 3.  If a non-zero value is contained in the PB-TNC
   Vendor ID field, message type 3 has a completely different meaning
   not defined in this specification.  The PB-TNC Message Length field
   MUST contain the value 16 since that is the total of the length of
   the fixed-length fields at the start of the PB-TNC message (the
   fields Flags, PB-TNC Vendor ID, PB-TNC Message Type, and PB-TNC
   Message Length) along with the Access Recommendation field described
   below.  Any Posture Broker Client or Posture Broker Server that
   receives a PB-Access-Recommendation message with a PB-TNC Message
   Length field that does not have a value of 16 MUST respond with a
   fatal Invalid Parameter error code in a CLOSE batch.

   The following diagram illustrates the format and contents of the PB-
   TNC Message Value field for this message type.  The text after this
   diagram describes the fields shown here.

       0                   1                   2                   3
       0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
      |          Reserved             |   Access Recommendation Code  |
      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

   Reserved (16 bits)

      These Reserved bits MUST be set to 0 on transmission and ignored
      on reception.

   Access Recommendation Code (16 bits)

      The Access Recommendation Code field identifies the Access
      Recommendation that the Posture Broker Server has made for this
      Posture Broker Client at this time.  This field MUST have one of
      these three values: 1 for Access Allowed (full access), 2 for
      Access Denied (no access), or 3 for Quarantined (partial access).
      If a Posture Broker Client receives an Access Recommendation Code
      value other than these three values, it MUST respond with a fatal
      Invalid Parameter error code in a CLOSE batch.  Other values may




<span class="grey">Sahita, et al.               Standards Track                   [Page 27]</span></pre>
<hr class='noprint'/><!--NewPage--><pre class='newpage'><span id="page-28" ></span>
<span class="grey"><a href="./rfc5793">RFC 5793</a>                         PB-TNC                       March 2010</span>


      be defined in future versions of PB-TNC but only if the PB-TNC
      version number is changed.  Therefore, there is no need for an
      IANA registry for Access Recommendation Codes.

<span class="h3"><a class="selflink" id="section-4.8" href="#section-4.8">4.8</a>.  PB-Remediation-Parameters</span>

   The PB-TNC message type named PB-Remediation-Parameters (value 4) is
   used by the Posture Broker Server to provide global (not Posture
   Validator-specific) remediation parameters after the Posture Broker
   Server has completed some assessment of the endpoint.  The Posture
   Broker Server MAY include one or more messages of this type in any
   batch of any type, but this message type is most useful in batches of
   type RESULT.

   The Posture Broker Client MUST NOT send a PB-TNC message with this
   message type.  If a Posture Broker Server receives a PB-TNC message
   with this message type, it MUST respond with a fatal Invalid
   Parameter error in a CLOSE batch.  The Posture Broker Client may
   implement and process this message but is not required to do so.  It
   may skip this message.  Even if the Posture Broker Client implements
   this message type, it is not obligated to act on it.

   The NOSKIP flag in the PB-TNC Message Header MUST NOT be set for this
   message type.  The PB-TNC Vendor ID field MUST contain the value zero
   (0) and the PB-TNC Message Type field MUST contain 4.  If a non-zero
   value is contained in the PB-TNC Vendor ID field, message type 4 has
   a completely different meaning not defined in this specification.

   The PB-TNC Message Length field MUST contain the length of the entire
   PB-TNC message, including the fixed-length fields at the start of the
   PB-TNC message (the fields Flags, PB-TNC Vendor ID, PB-TNC Message
   Type, and PB-TNC Message Length), the fixed-length fields listed
   below (Reserved, Remediation Parameters Vendor ID, and Remediation
   Parameters Type), and the Remediation Parameters.  Since the
   Remediation Parameters field is variable length, the value in the PB-
   TNC Message Length field will vary also.  However, it MUST always be
   at least 20 to cover the fixed-length fields listed in the preceding
   sentences.  Any Posture Broker Client that receives a PB-Remediation-
   Parameters message with a PB-TNC Message Length field that contains
   an invalid value (e.g., less than 20) MUST respond with a fatal
   Invalid Parameter error code in a CLOSE batch.

   The following diagram illustrates the format and contents of the PB-
   TNC Message Value field for this message type.  The text after this
   diagram describes the fields shown here.






<span class="grey">Sahita, et al.               Standards Track                   [Page 28]</span></pre>
<hr class='noprint'/><!--NewPage--><pre class='newpage'><span id="page-29" ></span>
<span class="grey"><a href="./rfc5793">RFC 5793</a>                         PB-TNC                       March 2010</span>


       0                   1                   2                   3
       0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
      |    Reserved   |       Remediation Parameters Vendor ID        |
      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
      |                  Remediation Parameters Type                  |
      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
      |            Remediation Parameters (Variable Length)           |
      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

   Reserved (8 bits)

      These Reserved bits MUST be set to 0 on transmission and ignored
      on reception.

   Remediation Parameters Vendor ID (24 bits)

      The Remediation Parameters Vendor ID field identifies a vendor by
      using the SMI Private Enterprise Number (PEN).  Any organization
      can receive its own unique PEN from IANA, the Internet Assigned
      Numbers Authority.  The Remediation Parameters Vendor ID qualifies
      the Remediation Parameters Type field so that each vendor has 2^32
      separate Remediation Parameters Types available for its use.
      Remediation Parameters Types standardized by the IETF are always
      used with the value zero (0) in this field.

   Remediation Parameters Type (32 bits)

      The Remediation Parameters Type field identifies the type of
      remediation parameters contained in the Remediation Parameters
      field.  A Posture Broker Client or Posture Broker Server MUST
      support having multiple Remediation Parameters messages contained
      in a single PB-TNC batch that have the same Remediation Parameters
      Type and/or Remediation Parameters Vendor ID.

      IANA maintains a registry of PB-TNC Remediation Parameters Types.
      Entries in this registry are added by Expert Review with
      Specification Required, following the guidelines in <a href="#section-6.1">section 6.1</a>.
      A list of IETF Standard PB-TNC Remediation Parameters Types
      defined in this specification appears later in this section.

      New vendor-specific Remediation Parameters Types (those used with
      a non-zero Remediation Parameters vendor ID) may be defined and
      employed by vendors without IETF or IANA involvement.  However,
      Posture Broker Clients and Posture Broker Servers MUST NOT require
      support for particular vendor-specific Remediation Parameters
      Types and MUST interoperate with other parties despite any
      differences in the set of vendor-specific Remediation Parameters



<span class="grey">Sahita, et al.               Standards Track                   [Page 29]</span></pre>
<hr class='noprint'/><!--NewPage--><pre class='newpage'><span id="page-30" ></span>
<span class="grey"><a href="./rfc5793">RFC 5793</a>                         PB-TNC                       March 2010</span>


      Types supported (although they MAY permit administrators to
      configure them to require support for specific Remediation
      Parameters Types).

      Note that the Remediation Parameters Type is completely separate
      from the PB-TNC Message Type and the PA Subtype fields.  The same
      value (e.g., 0) may have different meanings in each of these
      fields.

   Remediation Parameters (variable length)

      The Remediation Parameters field contains the actual remediation
      parameters carried in this PB-TNC message.  The length of this
      field can be determined by subtracting the length of the fixed-
      length fields at the start of the PB-TNC message (the fields
      Flags, PB-TNC Vendor ID, PB-TNC Message Type, and PB-TNC Message
      Length) and the fixed-length fields at the start of the PB-
      Remediation-Parameters message (Reserved, Remediation Parameters
      Vendor ID, and Remediation Parameters Type) from the message
      length contained in the PB-TNC Message Length field.  The length
      of these fixed-length fields is 20 octets.  Therefore, any Posture
      Broker Client that receives a PB-Remediation-Parameters message
      with a PB-TNC Message Length field whose value is less than 20
      MUST consider this a malformed message.  The Posture Broker Client
      MUST respond with a fatal Invalid Parameter error code in a CLOSE
      batch.

<span class="h4"><a class="selflink" id="section-4.8.1" href="#section-4.8.1">4.8.1</a>.  IETF Standard PB-TNC Remediation Parameters Types</span>

      This subsection defines several Remediation Parameters Types that
      have been standardized by the IETF.

   Remediation-URI

      This Remediation Parameters Type is employed by creating a PB-
      Remediation-Parameters message with a Remediation Parameters
      Vendor ID equal to the value zero (0) and a Remediation Parameters
      Type of 1.  The Remediation Parameters field in the PB-
      Remediation-Parameters message MUST contain a URI, as described in
      <a href="./rfc3986">RFC 3986</a> [<a href="#ref-2" title="&quot;Uniform Resource Identifier (URI): Generic Syntax&quot;">2</a>].  This URI contains instructions and resources for
      remediation.  The Posture Broker Client MAY load the URI and
      display the resulting web page to the user.  The Posture Broker
      Client MAY also ignore the URI or take another action with it.
      The Posture Broker Server and any other parties involved in
      configuring this remediation URI should consider the likely
      capabilities of the Posture Broker Client when creating the URI





<span class="grey">Sahita, et al.               Standards Track                   [Page 30]</span></pre>
<hr class='noprint'/><!--NewPage--><pre class='newpage'><span id="page-31" ></span>
<span class="grey"><a href="./rfc5793">RFC 5793</a>                         PB-TNC                       March 2010</span>


      and the content referenced by the URI.  For example, they should
      consider the Posture Broker Client's language preferences as
      expressed in the PB-Language-Preference message.

   Remediation-String

      This Remediation Parameters Type is employed by creating a PB-
      Remediation-Parameters message with a Remediation Parameters
      Vendor ID equal to the value zero (0) and a Remediation Parameters
      Type of 2.  The Remediation Parameters field in the PB-
      Remediation-Parameters message MUST contain the structure defined
      below, which contains human-readable instructions for remediation.

      The Posture Broker Client MAY display the instructions to the
      user.  The Posture Broker Client MAY also ignore the instructions
      or take another action with them.  The Posture Broker Server and
      any other parties involved in configuring these instructions
      should consider the likely capabilities of the Posture Broker
      Client when creating the instructions.  For example, they should
      consider the Posture Broker Client's language preferences as
      expressed in the PB-Language-Preference message.

      The following diagram illustrates the format and contents of the
      Remediation Parameters field when carrying a Remediation-String
      parameter.  The text after this diagram describes the fields shown
      here.

                          1                   2                   3
      0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
      |                   Remediation String Length                   |
      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
      |                Remediation String (Variable Length)           |
      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
      | Lang Code Len |  Remediation String Lang Code (Variable Len)  |
      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

   Remediation String Length (32 bits)

      The Remediation String Length contains the length of the
      Remediation String field in octets.

   Remediation String (variable length)

      The Remediation String field MUST contain a UTF-8 [<a href="#ref-6" title="&quot;UTF-8, a transformation format of ISO 10646&quot;">6</a>] encoded
      string.  This string contains human-readable instructions for
      remediation that MAY be displayed to the user by the Posture
      Broker Client.  NUL termination MUST NOT be included.  If a



<span class="grey">Sahita, et al.               Standards Track                   [Page 31]</span></pre>
<hr class='noprint'/><!--NewPage--><pre class='newpage'><span id="page-32" ></span>
<span class="grey"><a href="./rfc5793">RFC 5793</a>                         PB-TNC                       March 2010</span>


      Posture Broker Client receives a Reason String that does contain a
      NUL termination, it MUST respond with a fatal Invalid Parameter
      error in a CLOSE batch.

   Lang Code Len (8 bits)

      The Lang Code Len field contains the length of the Remediation
      String Lang Code field in octets.  This value may be set to zero
      to indicate that the language code for the Remediation String
      field is not known.

   Remediation String Lang Code (variable length)

      The Remediation String Lang Code field contains a US-ASCII string
      composed of a well-formed <a href="./rfc4646">RFC 4646</a> [<a href="#ref-3" title="&quot;Tags for Identifying Languages&quot;">3</a>] language tag that indicates
      the language(s) used in the Remediation String in the Remediation
      Parameters field.  A zero-length string may be sent for this field
      (essentially omitting this field) to indicate that the language
      code for the Remediation String field is not known.

<span class="h3"><a class="selflink" id="section-4.9" href="#section-4.9">4.9</a>.  PB-Error</span>

   The PB-TNC message type named PB-Error (value 5) is used by the
   Posture Broker Client or Posture Broker Server to indicate that an
   error has occurred.  The Posture Broker Client or Posture Broker
   Server MAY include one or more messages of this type in any batch of
   any type.  Other messages may also be included in the same batch.
   The party that receives a PB-Error message MAY log it or take other
   action as deemed appropriate.  If the FATAL flag is set (value 1),
   the recipient MUST terminate the PB-TNC session after processing the
   batch without sending any messages in response.  Every Posture Broker
   Client and Posture Broker Server MUST implement this message type.

   The NOSKIP flag in the PB-TNC Message Header MUST be set for this
   message type.  The PB-TNC Vendor ID field MUST contain the value zero
   (0) and the PB-TNC Message Type field MUST contain 5.  If a non-zero
   value is contained in the PB-TNC Vendor ID field, message type 5 has
   a completely different meaning not defined in this specification.

   The PB-TNC Message Length field MUST contain the length of the entire
   PB-TNC message, including the fixed-length fields at the start of the
   PB-TNC message (the fields Flags, PB-TNC Vendor ID, PB-TNC Message
   Type, and PB-TNC Message Length), the fixed-length fields listed
   below (Flags, Error Code Vendor ID, Error Code, and Reserved), and
   the Error Parameters.  Since the Error Parameters field is variable
   length, the value in the PB-TNC Message Length field will vary also.





<span class="grey">Sahita, et al.               Standards Track                   [Page 32]</span></pre>
<hr class='noprint'/><!--NewPage--><pre class='newpage'><span id="page-33" ></span>
<span class="grey"><a href="./rfc5793">RFC 5793</a>                         PB-TNC                       March 2010</span>


   However, it MUST always be at least 20 to cover the fixed-length
   fields listed in the preceding sentences.  Any Posture Broker Client
   or Posture Broker Server that receives a PB-Error message with a PB-
   TNC Message Length field that contains an invalid value (e.g., less
   than 20) MUST respond with a fatal Invalid Parameter error code in a
   CLOSE batch.  Any PB-Error message generated while processing a PB-
   Error message MUST be a fatal error to avoid the chance of generating
   an infinite loop of errors.

   The following diagram illustrates the format and contents of the PB-
   TNC Message Value field for this message type.  The text after this
   diagram describes the fields shown here.

       0                   1                   2                   3
       0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
      |    Flags      |              Error Code Vendor ID             |
      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
      |           Error Code          |           Reserved            |
      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
      |                Error Parameters (Variable Length)             |
      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

   Flags (8 bits)

      This field defines flags relating to the error.

      Bit 0 of this flags field (the most significant bit) is known as
      the FATAL flag.  If the FATAL bit is cleared (value 0), the
      Posture Broker Client or Posture Broker Server that receives this
      PB-TNC message SHOULD process this error and then continue with
      the exchange.  If the FATAL flag is set (value 1), the Posture
      Broker Client or Posture Broker Server that receives this PB-TNC
      message MUST terminate the exchange after processing the error.
      In addition, any Posture Broker Client or Posture Broker Server
      that sends a fatal error MUST NOT process the batch that caused
      the error and MUST terminate the exchange after sending the batch
      containing the error report.  A PB-Error message with the FATAL
      flag set MUST always be sent in a CLOSE batch since the sender
      will be terminating the exchange immediately after sending the
      batch.

      The FATAL bit allows a Posture Broker Client or Posture Broker
      Server to signal a fatal error (like an invalid batch type) and/or
      a non-fatal error (like an invalid language tag for a preferred
      language).





<span class="grey">Sahita, et al.               Standards Track                   [Page 33]</span></pre>
<hr class='noprint'/><!--NewPage--><pre class='newpage'><span id="page-34" ></span>
<span class="grey"><a href="./rfc5793">RFC 5793</a>                         PB-TNC                       March 2010</span>


      The other bits in this Flags field are reserved.  For this version
      of PB-TNC, they MUST be set to 0 on transmission and ignored on
      reception.

   Error Code Vendor ID (24 bits)

      The Error Code Vendor ID field identifies a vendor by using the
      SMI Private Enterprise Number (PEN).  Any organization can receive
      its own unique PEN from IANA, the Internet Assigned Numbers
      Authority.  The Error Code Vendor ID qualifies the Error Code
      field so that each vendor has 2^16 separate Error Codes available
      for its use.  Error codes standardized by the IETF are always used
      with the value zero (0) in this field.  For detailed descriptions
      of those messages, see the next few subsections.

   Error Code (16 bits)

      The Error Code field identifies the type of error being signaled
      with this message.  The format of the Error Parameters field
      depends on the value of the Error Code Vendor ID and the Error
      Code.  However, any recipient that does not understand a
      particular error code can process the error fairly well by using
      the FATAL flag to determine whether the error is fatal and the PB-
      TNC Message Length to skip over the Error Parameters field (or log
      it).

      IANA maintains a registry of PB-TNC Error Codes.  Entries in this
      registry are added by Expert Review with Specification Required,
      following the guidelines in <a href="#section-6.1">section 6.1</a>.  A list of IETF Standard
      PB-TNC Error Codes defined in this specification appears later in
      <a href="#section-4.9.1">section 4.9.1</a>.

      New vendor-specific error codes (those used with a non-zero error
      code vendor ID) may be defined and employed by vendors without
      IETF or IANA involvement.  Posture Broker Clients and Posture
      Broker Servers that receive an unknown error code MUST process
      this error code gracefully by ignoring or logging it if it is not
      marked as fatal and terminating the exchange if it is marked as
      fatal.

   Reserved (16 bits)

      The Reserved bits MUST be set to 0 on transmission and ignored on
      reception.







<span class="grey">Sahita, et al.               Standards Track                   [Page 34]</span></pre>
<hr class='noprint'/><!--NewPage--><pre class='newpage'><span id="page-35" ></span>
<span class="grey"><a href="./rfc5793">RFC 5793</a>                         PB-TNC                       March 2010</span>


<span class="h4"><a class="selflink" id="section-4.9.1" href="#section-4.9.1">4.9.1</a>.  IETF Standard PB-TNC Error Codes</span>

   The following error codes are IETF Standard PB-TNC Error Codes, hence
   the Error Code Vendor ID MUST be the value zero (0).  The following
   table defines the 16-bit error code.  Vendor-specific error codes may
   be defined by setting the Error Code Vendor ID to the defining
   vendor's SMI PEN and setting the Error Code field to whatever error
   code(s) that vendor has defined.  The format, length, and meaning of
   the Error Parameters field varies, based on the Error Code Vendor ID
   and Error Code.  Subsequent sections of this document define the
   format, length, and meaning of the Error Parameters for the IETF
   Standard PB-TNC Error Codes defined in this section.

   Error Code  Definition
   ----------  ----------
   0           Unexpected Batch Type.  Error Parameters are empty.

   1           Invalid Parameter.  Error Parameters has offset where
               invalid value was found.

   2           Local Error.  Error Parameters are empty.

   3           Unsupported Mandatory Message.  Error Parameters has
               offset of offending PB-TNC Message

   4           Version Not Supported.  Error Parameters has information
               about which versions are supported.

<span class="h4"><a class="selflink" id="section-4.9.2" href="#section-4.9.2">4.9.2</a>.  Error Parameters Structures for IETF Standard PB-TNC Error Codes</span>

   This section defines the format, length, and meaning of the Error
   Parameters field for the IETF Standard PB-TNC Error Codes defined in
   this specification.

   The Error Parameters field is zero length for the IETF Standard PB-
   TNC Error Code 0.  The FATAL flag MUST be set for this error code.

   The Error Parameters field has the following structure for the IETF
   Standard PB-TNC Error Code 1.  The Offset field is the offset in
   octets from the start of the PB-TNC batch to the invalid value.  The
   FATAL flag may be either set or cleared for this error code.

       0                   1                   2                   3
       0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
      |                              Offset                           |
      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+




<span class="grey">Sahita, et al.               Standards Track                   [Page 35]</span></pre>
<hr class='noprint'/><!--NewPage--><pre class='newpage'><span id="page-36" ></span>
<span class="grey"><a href="./rfc5793">RFC 5793</a>                         PB-TNC                       March 2010</span>


   The Error Parameters field is zero length for the IETF Standard PB-
   TNC Error Code 2.  The FATAL flag MUST be set for this error code.

   The Error Parameters field has the following structure for the IETF
   Standard PB-TNC Error Code 3.  The Offset field is the offset in
   octets from the start of the PB-TNC batch to the PB-TNC message whose
   message type was not recognized (and where the NOSKIP flag was set).
   The FATAL flag MUST be set for this error code.

       0                   1                   2                   3
       0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
      |                              Offset                           |
      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

   The Error Parameters field has the following structure for the IETF
   Standard PB-TNC Error Code 4.  The FATAL flag MUST be set for this
   error code.

       0                   1                   2                   3
       0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
      |  Bad Version  |  Max Version  |  Min Version  |   Reserved    |
      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

   The Bad Version field is the version number that was received and is
   not supported.  The Max Version and Min Version fields indicate which
   PB-TNC version numbers are supported by the sender of the error code.
   The sender MUST support all PB-TNC versions between the Min Version
   and the Max Version, inclusive (i.e., including the Min Version and
   the Max Version) but excluding the reserved versions listed in
   <a href="#section-4.1">section 4.1</a>.  The Reserved field MUST be set to 0 on transmission and
   ignored upon reception.  When possible, recipients of this error code
   SHOULD send future messages to the Posture Broker Server or Posture
   Broker Client that originated this error message with a PB-TNC
   version number within the stated range.

   Any party that is sending the Version Not Supported error code MUST
   include that error code as the only PB-TNC message in a PB-TNC CLOSE
   batch with version number 2.  All parties that send PB-TNC batches
   SHOULD be able to properly process a batch that meets this
   description, even if they cannot process any other aspect of PB-TNC
   version 2.  This ensures that a PB-TNC version exchange can proceed
   properly, no matter what versions of PB-TNC the parties implement.







<span class="grey">Sahita, et al.               Standards Track                   [Page 36]</span></pre>
<hr class='noprint'/><!--NewPage--><pre class='newpage'><span id="page-37" ></span>
<span class="grey"><a href="./rfc5793">RFC 5793</a>                         PB-TNC                       March 2010</span>


<span class="h3"><a class="selflink" id="section-4.10" href="#section-4.10">4.10</a>.  PB-Language-Preference</span>

   The PB-TNC message type named PB-Language-Parameters (value 6) is
   used by the Posture Broker Client to indicate which language or
   languages it would prefer for any human-readable strings that might
   be sent to it.  This allows the Posture Broker Server and Posture
   Validators to adapt any messages they may send to the Posture Broker
   Client's preferences (probably determined by the language preferences
   of the endpoint's users).

   The Posture Broker Server may also send this message type to the
   Posture Broker Client to indicate the Posture Broker Server's
   language preferences, but this is not very useful since the Posture
   Broker Client rarely sends human-readable strings to the Posture
   Broker Server and, if it does, rarely can adapt those strings to the
   preferences of the Posture Broker Server.

   No Posture Broker Client or Posture Broker Server is required to send
   or implement this message type.  However, a Posture Broker Server
   SHOULD attempt to adapt to user language preferences by implementing
   this message type, passing the language preference information to
   Posture Validators, and allowing administrators to configure human-
   readable languages in whatever languages are preferred by their
   users.

   A Posture Broker Client or Posture Broker Server may include a
   message of this type in any batch of any type.  However, it is
   suggested that this message be included in the first batch sent by
   the Posture Broker Client or Posture Broker Server in a PB-TNC
   session so that the recipient can start adapting its human-readable
   messages as soon as possible.  If one PB-Language-Parameters message
   is received and then another one is received in a later batch for the
   same PB-TNC session, the value included in the later message should
   be considered to replace the value in the earlier message.

   A Posture Broker Client or Posture Broker Server MUST NOT include
   more than one message of this type in a single batch.  If a Posture
   Broker Client or Posture Broker Server receives more than one message
   of this type in a single batch, it should ignore all but the last
   one.

   The NOSKIP flag in the PB-TNC Message Header MUST NOT be set for this
   message type.  The PB-TNC Vendor ID field MUST contain the value zero
   (0) and the PB-TNC Message Type field MUST contain 6.  If a non-zero
   value is contained in the PB-TNC Vendor ID field, message type 6 has
   a completely different meaning not defined in this specification.





<span class="grey">Sahita, et al.               Standards Track                   [Page 37]</span></pre>
<hr class='noprint'/><!--NewPage--><pre class='newpage'><span id="page-38" ></span>
<span class="grey"><a href="./rfc5793">RFC 5793</a>                         PB-TNC                       March 2010</span>


   The PB-TNC Message Length field MUST contain the length of the entire
   PB-TNC message, including the fixed-length fields at the start of the
   PB-TNC message (the fields Flags, PB-TNC Vendor ID, PB-TNC Message
   Type, and PB-TNC Message Length) and the Language Preference field.
   Since the Language Preference field is variable length, the value in
   the PB-TNC Message Length field will vary also.  However, it MUST
   always be at least 12 to cover the fixed-length fields listed in the
   preceding sentences.

   The following diagram illustrates the format and contents of the PB-
   TNC Message Value field for this message type.  The text after this
   diagram describes the fields shown here.

       0                   1                   2                   3
       0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
      |              Language Preference (Variable Length)            |
      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

   Language Preference (variable length)

      The Language Preference field contains an Accept-Language header,
      as described in <a href="./rfc3282">RFC 3282</a> [<a href="#ref-4" title="&quot;Content Language Headers&quot;">4</a>] (using the <a href="./rfc2234">RFC 2234</a> ABNF definition
      of Accept-Language included in that RFC, US-ASCII only, no control
      characters allowed, no comments, no NUL termination).  Any Posture
      Broker Client or Posture Broker Server that sends a PB-Language-
      Preference message MUST ensure that the Language Preference field
      conforms to this format.  For example, one acceptable value would
      be "Accept-Language: fr, en" (without the quote marks).

      A zero-length Language Preference field indicates that no language
      preference information is available.  Generally, there's no need
      to send a PB-Language-Preference message with a zero-length
      Language Preference field since this is equivalent to sending no
      PB-Language-Preference message at all, but it may be useful to
      send a zero-length Language Preference field if a PB-Language-
      Preference message with a non-zero-length Language Preference
      field was sent in an earlier batch but these preferences no longer
      apply.

<span class="h3"><a class="selflink" id="section-4.11" href="#section-4.11">4.11</a>.  PB-Reason-String</span>

   The PB-TNC message type named PB-Reason-String (value 7) is used by
   the Posture Broker Server to provide a human-readable explanation for
   the global assessment decision conveyed in the PB-Assessment-Result &amp;
   PB-Access-Recommendation messages.  Therefore, a PB-Reason-String





<span class="grey">Sahita, et al.               Standards Track                   [Page 38]</span></pre>
<hr class='noprint'/><!--NewPage--><pre class='newpage'><span id="page-39" ></span>
<span class="grey"><a href="./rfc5793">RFC 5793</a>                         PB-TNC                       March 2010</span>


   message SHOULD only be included in the same batch as the PB-
   Assessment-Result and PB-Access-Recommendation message.  The Posture
   Broker Client MUST NOT ever send a PB-Reason-String message.

   The Posture Broker Client is not required to implement this message
   type and the Posture Broker Server is not required to send it.
   However, there is some benefit to doing so since users are often
   curious about why the endpoint was considered non-compliant.  The
   manner in which a Posture Broker Client uses this field is up to the
   implementer and not specified here.  The Posture Broker Client MAY
   display the message to the user, log it, ignore it, or take any other
   action that is not inconsistent with the requirements of this
   specification.  Since the strings contained in this message are
   human-readable, the Posture Broker Server SHOULD adapt them to the
   Posture Broker Client's language preferences as expressed in any PB-
   Language-Preference message sent by the Posture Broker Client in this
   PB-TNC session.

   A Posture Broker Server MAY include more than one message of this
   type in any batch of any type.  However, it is suggested that this
   message be included in the same batch as the PB-Assessment-Result and
   PB-Access-Recommendation message.  If more than one PB-Reason-String
   message is included in a single batch, the Posture Broker Client
   SHOULD consider the strings included in these messages to be
   equivalent in meaning.  This allows the Posture Broker Server to
   return multiple equivalent reason strings in different languages,
   which may help if the Posture Broker Server is not able to
   accommodate the Posture Broker Client's language preferences.

   The NOSKIP flag in the PB-TNC Message Header MUST NOT be set for this
   message type.  The PB-TNC Vendor ID field MUST contain the value zero
   (0) and the PB-TNC Message Type field MUST contain 7.  If a non-zero
   value is contained in the PB-TNC Vendor ID field, message type 7 has
   a completely different meaning not defined in this specification.

   The PB-TNC Message Length field MUST contain the length of the entire
   PB-TNC message, including the fixed-length fields at the start of the
   PB-TNC message (the fields Flags, PB-TNC Vendor ID, PB-TNC Message
   Type, and PB-TNC Message Length), the fixed-length fields listed
   below (Reason String Length and Lang Code Len), and the Reason String
   and Reason String Language Code fields.  Since the Reason String and
   Reason String Language Code fields are variable length, the value in
   the PB-TNC Message Length field will vary also.  However, it MUST
   always be at least 17 to cover the fixed-length fields listed in the
   preceding sentences.  In fact, the PB-TNC Message Length field MUST
   be exactly the sum of 17 (for the fixed-length fields) and the values





<span class="grey">Sahita, et al.               Standards Track                   [Page 39]</span></pre>
<hr class='noprint'/><!--NewPage--><pre class='newpage'><span id="page-40" ></span>
<span class="grey"><a href="./rfc5793">RFC 5793</a>                         PB-TNC                       March 2010</span>


   of the Reason String Length and Lang Code Len fields.  If this is not
   the case, the recipient MUST respond with a fatal Invalid Parameter
   error code in a CLOSE batch.

   The following diagram illustrates the format and contents of the PB-
   TNC Message Value field for this message type.  The text after this
   diagram describes the fields shown here.

       0                   1                   2                   3
       0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
      |                      Reason String Length                     |
      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
      |                Reason String (Variable Length)                |
      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
      | Lang Code Len | Reason String Language Code (Variable Length) |
      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

   Reason String Length (32 bits)

      The Reason String Length field contains the length of the Reason
      String field in octets.

   Reason String (variable length)

      The Reason String field contains a UTF-8 encoded string that
      provides a human-readable reason for the Posture Broker Server's
      assessment decision.  NUL termination MUST NOT be included.  If a
      Posture Broker Client receives a Reason String that does contain a
      NUL termination, it MUST respond with a fatal Invalid Parameter
      error code in a CLOSE batch.  A zero-length string MUST NOT be
      sent since this is the same as sending no reason string at all,
      leaving the reason unspecified.

   Lang Code Len (8 bits)

      The Lang Code Len field contains the length of the Reason String
      Language Code field in octets.

   Reason String Language Code (variable length)

      The Reason String Language Code field contains a US-ASCII string
      containing a well-formed <a href="./rfc4646">RFC 4646</a> [<a href="#ref-3" title="&quot;Tags for Identifying Languages&quot;">3</a>] language tag that indicates
      the language(s) used in the Reason String in this message.  NUL
      termination MUST NOT be included in this field.  A zero-length
      string MAY be sent for this field (essentially omitting this
      field) to indicate that the language code for the reason string is
      not known.



<span class="grey">Sahita, et al.               Standards Track                   [Page 40]</span></pre>
<hr class='noprint'/><!--NewPage--><pre class='newpage'><span id="page-41" ></span>
<span class="grey"><a href="./rfc5793">RFC 5793</a>                         PB-TNC                       March 2010</span>


<span class="h2"><a class="selflink" id="section-5" href="#section-5">5</a>.  Security Considerations</span>

   PT is required and assumed to provide reliable and secure transport
   for the PB-TNC protocol (including authentication, confidentiality,
   integrity protection, and replay protection).  Still, it is useful to
   describe the possible threats to PB-TNC and the countermeasures that
   are or can be employed.  This section does that.

<span class="h3"><a class="selflink" id="section-5.1" href="#section-5.1">5.1</a>.  Threat Model</span>

   There are several possible threats to the PB-TNC protocol.

   Untrusted intermediaries on the network between the NEA Client and
   the NEA Server may attempt to observe data sent between the Posture
   Broker Client and the Posture Broker Server via PB-TNC, modify this
   data in transit, reorder it, or replay it.  They may also attempt to
   mount a denial-of-service attack against either party or truncate the
   exchange prematurely.  If successful, these attacks may result in
   improper assessment decisions relating to the NEA Client, failure to
   reassess these decisions in light of changed circumstances, improper
   remediation instructions sent to the NEA Client (which could lead to
   the compromise of the NEA Client), unauthorized access to
   confidential information about the NEA Client's health and/or
   identity, improper reason strings or other messages that might be
   displayed to the user, access to reusable credentials such as posture
   assertions, denial of service on the NEA Client, and even complete
   denial of access to the network (if a denial-of-service attack
   against the NEA Server was successful and the network required
   permission from the NEA Server to grant network access).

   Trusted intermediaries between the Posture Broker Client and the
   Posture Broker Server include the Posture Transport Client and the
   Posture Transport Server.  These parties are considered trusted
   because they are responsible for properly implementing the security
   protections provided by PT.  If they fail to do so properly, these
   security protections may be diminished or eliminated altogether.  The
   possible attacks are the same as those listed in the previous
   paragraph.  To give one fairly likely example, if a Posture Transport
   Client fails to properly authenticate and authorize the Posture
   Transport Server (whether through implementation error or through
   user configuration to "trust anyone"), the improperly authorized
   Posture Transport Server may mount any of the previously described
   attacks against the NEA Client.

   Compromise of any of the trusted parties (the Posture Broker Client,
   the Posture Transport Client, the Posture Broker Server, or the
   Posture Transport Server) may result in failures that are equivalent
   to those listed in the first paragraph.  These failures may be even



<span class="grey">Sahita, et al.               Standards Track                   [Page 41]</span></pre>
<hr class='noprint'/><!--NewPage--><pre class='newpage'><span id="page-42" ></span>
<span class="grey"><a href="./rfc5793">RFC 5793</a>                         PB-TNC                       March 2010</span>


   more dangerous since they will not be detectable by observing network
   traffic or by examining and comparing audit logs.  Failure to
   properly secure communications between the Posture Broker Client and
   the Posture Transport Client or between the Posture Broker Server and
   the Posture Transport Server is usually indistinguishable from
   compromise of those parties.  Compromise of the operating system or
   other critical software, firmware, or hardware components on the NEA
   Client or NEA Server will typically result in an equivalent result.
   And an attacker's ability to gain privileged access to the NEA Client
   or NEA Server (even for a brief time, long enough to disable or
   misconfigure security settings) is generally equivalent as well.  If
   the NEA Client or NEA Server are dependent on other services for
   their proper operation (including Posture Collectors, Posture
   Validators, directories, and patch management services), compromise
   of those services may result in compromise or failure of the
   dependent parties.  Of course, compromise or failure of NEA Server
   components is most serious since this would probably affect a large
   number of NEA Clients while the effects of NEA Client compromise
   might well be limited to a single machine.

<span class="h3"><a class="selflink" id="section-5.2" href="#section-5.2">5.2</a>.  Countermeasures</span>

   The primary countermeasure against attacks by untrusted network
   intermediaries is the security provided by the PT protocol.  Any
   candidate PT protocols should be carefully examined to ensure that
   all the threats described above are adequately addressed.

   As noted above, compromise or erroneous operation of any of the
   trusted parties is a serious matter with substantial security
   implications.  This includes the Posture Broker Client, the Posture
   Broker Server, the Posture Transport Client, and the Posture
   Transport Server.  These are all security-sensitive components so
   they should be built and managed in accordance with best practices
   for security devices.  This is especially important for the NEA
   Server and its components since a compromise of this device would
   affect the security and availability of the entire network (similar
   to compromise of a AAA server).  Communications between the trusted
   parties must also be secured.  For example, if the Posture Broker
   Server and the Posture Transport Server are separate components,
   their communications must be secured.

   Since the NEA Client may be a mobile device with little physical
   security (such as a laptop computer or even a public telephone), it
   should generally be assumed that some proportion of Access NEA
   Clients will be compromised and therefore hostile.  The NEA Server
   should be designed to be robust against hostile NEA Clients.  Once a





<span class="grey">Sahita, et al.               Standards Track                   [Page 42]</span></pre>
<hr class='noprint'/><!--NewPage--><pre class='newpage'><span id="page-43" ></span>
<span class="grey"><a href="./rfc5793">RFC 5793</a>                         PB-TNC                       March 2010</span>


   compromised NEA Client is detected, it can be treated in a manner
   equivalent to an untrusted party and should pose no greater threat
   than any other untrusted party.

   Countermeasures against a compromised NEA Server (or a component
   thereof such as a Posture Broker Server or a Posture Transport
   Server) include prevention of compromise, detection of compromise,
   and mitigation of the effects of compromise.  For prevention, the NEA
   Server and its components and dependencies should be implemented
   using secure implementation techniques (e.g., secure coding and
   minimization) and managed using secure practices (e.g., strong
   authentication and separation of duty).  For detection, the behavior
   of the NEA Server should be monitored (e.g., via logging especially
   of remediation instructions, intrusion detection systems, and probes
   that impersonate a valid NEA Client and record NEA Server behavior)
   and any anomalies analyzed.  For mitigation, NEA Clients should not
   blindly follow remediation instructions received from a trusted NEA
   Server.  At least for patches and other dangerous actions, they
   should validate these actions (e.g., via user confirmation) before
   proceeding.  It should not be possible to configure a NEA Client to
   trust all NEA Servers without proper authentication and
   authorization.

<span class="h2"><a class="selflink" id="section-6" href="#section-6">6</a>.  IANA Considerations</span>

   Four new IANA registries are defined by this specification: PB-TNC
   Message Types, PA Subtypes, PB-TNC Remediation Parameters Types, and
   PB-TNC Error Codes.  This section explains how these registries work.

   All of these registries support IETF standard values and vendor-
   defined values.  To explain this phenomenon, we will use the PB-TNC
   Message Type as an example but the other three registries work the
   same way.  Whenever a PB-TNC Message Type appears on a network, it is
   always accompanied by an SMI Private Enterprise Number (PEN), also
   known as a vendor ID.  If this vendor ID is zero, the accompanying
   PB-TNC Message Type is an IETF standard value listed in the IANA
   registry for PB-TNC Message Types and its meaning is defined in the
   specification listed for that PB-TNC Message Type in that registry.
   If the vendor ID is not zero, the meaning of the PB-TNC Message Type
   is defined by the vendor identified by the vendor ID (as listed in
   the IANA registry for SMI PENs).  The identified vendor is encouraged
   but not required to register with IANA some or all of the PB-TNC
   Message Types used with their vendor ID and publish a specification
   for each of these values.

   This delegation of namespace is analogous to the technique used for
   OIDs.  It can result in interoperability problems if vendors require
   support for particular vendor-specific values.  However, such



<span class="grey">Sahita, et al.               Standards Track                   [Page 43]</span></pre>
<hr class='noprint'/><!--NewPage--><pre class='newpage'><span id="page-44" ></span>
<span class="grey"><a href="./rfc5793">RFC 5793</a>                         PB-TNC                       March 2010</span>


   behavior is explicitly prohibited by this specification, which
   dictates that "Posture Broker Clients and Posture Broker Servers MUST
   NOT require support for particular vendor-specific PB-TNC message
   types and MUST interoperate with other parties despite any
   differences in the set of vendor-specific PB-TNC message types
   supported (although they MAY permit administrators to configure them
   to require support for specific PB-TNC message types)." Similar
   requirements are included for PA Subtypes, Remediation Parameters
   Types, and PB-TNC Error Codes.

<span class="h3"><a class="selflink" id="section-6.1" href="#section-6.1">6.1</a>.  Designated Expert Guidelines</span>

   For all of the four IANA registries defined by this specification,
   new values are added to the registry by Expert Review with
   Specification Required, using the Designated Expert process defined
   in <a href="./rfc5226">RFC 5226</a> [<a href="#ref-5" title="">5</a>].

   This section provides guidance to designated experts so that they may
   make decisions using a philosophy appropriate for these registries.

   The registries defined in this document have plenty of values.  In
   most cases, the IETF has approximately 2^32 values available for it
   to define and each vendor the same number of values for its use.  The
   only exception is the registry for PB-TNC Error Codes where 2^16
   values are available for the IETF and 2^16 values for each vendor.
   Because there are so many values available, designated experts should
   not be terribly concerned about exhausting the set of values.

   Instead, designated experts should focus on the following
   requirements.  All values in these IANA registries MUST be documented
   in a specification that is permanently and publicly available.  IETF
   standard values MUST also be useful, not harmful to the Internet, and
   defined in a manner that is clear and likely to ensure
   interoperability.

   Designated experts should encourage vendors to avoid defining similar
   but incompatible values and instead agree on a single IETF standard
   value.  However, it is beneficial to document existing practice.

   There are several ways to ensure that a specification is permanently
   and publicly available.  It may be published as an RFC.
   Alternatively, it may be published in another manner that makes it
   freely available to anyone.  However, in this latter case, the vendor
   MUST supply a copy to the IANA and authorize the IANA to archive this
   copy and make it freely available to all if at some point the
   document becomes no longer freely available to all through other
   channels.




<span class="grey">Sahita, et al.               Standards Track                   [Page 44]</span></pre>
<hr class='noprint'/><!--NewPage--><pre class='newpage'><span id="page-45" ></span>
<span class="grey"><a href="./rfc5793">RFC 5793</a>                         PB-TNC                       March 2010</span>


<span class="h3"><a class="selflink" id="section-6.2" href="#section-6.2">6.2</a>.  Registry for PB-TNC Message Types</span>

   The name for this registry is "PB-TNC Message Types".  Each entry in
   this registry should include a human-readable name, an SMI Private
   Enterprise Number, a decimal integer value between 0 and 2^32-2, and
   a reference to a specification where the contents of this message
   type are defined.  This specification must define the meaning of this
   PB-TNC message type and the format and semantics of the PB-TNC
   Message Value field for PB-TNC messages that include the designated
   numeric value in the PB-TNC Message Type field and the designated
   Private Enterprise Number in the PB-TNC Vendor ID field.

   Entries to this registry are added by Expert Review with
   Specification Required, following the guidelines in <a href="#section-6.1">section 6.1</a>.

   The following entries for this registry are defined in this document.
   They are the initial entries in the registry for PB-TNC Message
   Types.

   PEN Integer Name                         Defining Specification
   --- ------- ----                         ----------------------
   0   0       PB-Experimental              <a href="./rfc5793">RFC 5793</a>
   0   1       PB-PA                        <a href="./rfc5793">RFC 5793</a>
   0   2       PB-Assessment-Result         <a href="./rfc5793">RFC 5793</a>
   0   3       PB-Access-Recommendation     <a href="./rfc5793">RFC 5793</a>
   0   4       PB-Remediation-Parameters    <a href="./rfc5793">RFC 5793</a>
   0   5       PB-Error                     <a href="./rfc5793">RFC 5793</a>
   0   6       PB-Language-Preference       <a href="./rfc5793">RFC 5793</a>
   0   7       PB-Reason-String             <a href="./rfc5793">RFC 5793</a>
   0 0xffffffff Reserved                    <a href="./rfc5793">RFC 5793</a>

<span class="h3"><a class="selflink" id="section-6.3" href="#section-6.3">6.3</a>.  Registry for PA Subtypes</span>

   The name for this registry is "PA Subtypes".  Each entry in this
   registry should include a human-readable name, an SMI Private
   Enterprise Number, a decimal integer value between 0 and 2^32-2, and
   a reference to a specification where the contents of this PA subtype
   are defined.  This specification must define the meaning of this PA
   subtype and the format and semantics of the PA Message Body field for
   PB-TNC messages that have a PB-TNC Vendor ID of 0, a PB-TNC Message
   Type of PB-PA, the designated numeric value in the PA Subtype field,
   and the designated Private Enterprise Number in the PA Message Vendor
   ID field.

   Entries to this registry are added by Expert Review with
   Specification Required, following the guidelines in <a href="#section-6.1">section 6.1</a>.





<span class="grey">Sahita, et al.               Standards Track                   [Page 45]</span></pre>
<hr class='noprint'/><!--NewPage--><pre class='newpage'><span id="page-46" ></span>
<span class="grey"><a href="./rfc5793">RFC 5793</a>                         PB-TNC                       March 2010</span>


   This document does not define any initial entries for this registry.
   Therefore, this registry should initially be empty.  Subsequent RFCs
   (such as PA-TNC) will define entries in this registry.

<span class="h3"><a class="selflink" id="section-6.4" href="#section-6.4">6.4</a>.  Registry for PB-TNC Remediation Parameters Types</span>

   The name for this registry is "PB-TNC Remediation Parameters Types".
   Each entry in this registry should include a human-readable name, an
   SMI Private Enterprise Number, a decimal integer value between 0 and
   2^32-1, and a reference to a specification where the contents of this
   remediation parameters type are defined.  This specification must
   define the meaning of this remediation parameters type value and the
   format and semantics of the Remediation Parameters field for PB-TNC
   messages that have a PB-TNC Vendor ID of 0, a PB-TNC Message Type of
   PB-Remediation-Parameters, the designated numeric value in the
   Remediation Parameters Type field, and the designated Private
   Enterprise Number in the Remediation Parameters Vendor ID field.

   Entries to this registry are added by Expert Review with
   Specification Required, following the guidelines in <a href="#section-6.1">section 6.1</a>.

   The following entries for this registry are defined in this document.
   They are the initial entries in the registry for PB-TNC Remediation
   Parameters Types.

   PEN Integer Name                      Defining Specification
   --- ------- ----                      ----------------------
   0   1       Remediation-URI           <a href="./rfc5793">RFC 5793</a>
   0   2       Remediation-String        <a href="./rfc5793">RFC 5793</a>

<span class="h3"><a class="selflink" id="section-6.5" href="#section-6.5">6.5</a>.  Registry for PB-TNC Error Codes</span>

   The name for this registry is "PB-TNC Error Codes".  Each entry in
   this registry should include a human-readable name, an SMI Private
   Enterprise Number, a decimal integer value between 0 and 2^16-1, and
   a reference to a specification where this error code is defined.
   This specification must define the meaning of this error code and the
   format and semantics of the Error Parameters field for PB-TNC
   messages that have a PB-TNC Vendor ID of 0, a PB-TNC Message Type of
   PB-Error, the designated numeric value in the Error Code field, and
   the designated Private Enterprise Number in the Error Code Vendor ID
   field.

   Entries to this registry are added by Expert Review with
   Specification Required, following the guidelines in <a href="#section-6.1">section 6.1</a>.

   The following entries for this registry are defined in this document.
   They are the initial entries in the registry for PB-TNC Error Codes.



<span class="grey">Sahita, et al.               Standards Track                   [Page 46]</span></pre>
<hr class='noprint'/><!--NewPage--><pre class='newpage'><span id="page-47" ></span>
<span class="grey"><a href="./rfc5793">RFC 5793</a>                         PB-TNC                       March 2010</span>


   PEN Integer Name                          Defining Specification
   --- ------- ----                          ----------------------
   0   0       Unexpected Batch Type         <a href="./rfc5793">RFC 5793</a>
   0   1       Invalid Parameter             <a href="./rfc5793">RFC 5793</a>
   0   2       Local Error                   <a href="./rfc5793">RFC 5793</a>
   0   3       Unsupported Mandatory Message <a href="./rfc5793">RFC 5793</a>
   0   4       Version Not Supported         <a href="./rfc5793">RFC 5793</a>

<span class="h2"><a class="selflink" id="section-7" href="#section-7">7</a>.  Acknowledgments</span>

   Thanks to the Trusted Computing Group for contributing the initial
   text upon which this document was based.

   The authors of this document would like to acknowledge the following
   people who have contributed to or provided substantial input on the
   preparation of this document or predecessors to it: Bernard Aboba,
   Amit Agarwal, Morteza Ansari, Diana Arroyo, Stuart Bailey, Boris
   Balacheff, Gene Chang, Roger Chickering, Scott Cochrane, Pasi Eronen,
   Aman Garg, Sandilya Garimella, Lauren Giroux, Mudit Goel, Charles
   Goldberg, Thomas Hardjono, Chris Hessing, Hidenobu Ito, John Jerrim,
   Meenakshi Kaushik, Greg Kazmierczak, Scott Kelly, Tom Kelnar, Bryan
   Kingsford, PJ Kirner, Houcheng Lee, Sung Lee, Lisa Lorenzin,
   Mahalingam Mani, Paul Mayfield, Michael McDaniels, Bipin Mistry, Rod
   Murchison, Barbara Nelson, Kazuaki Nimura, Ron Pon, Ivan Pulleyn,
   Alex Romanyuk, Chris Salter, Mauricio Sanchez, Paul Sangster, Dean
   Sheffield, Curtis Simonson, Jeff Six, Ned Smith, Michelle Sommerstad,
   Joseph Tardo, Lee Terrell, Chris Trytten, Brad Upson, Ram Vadali,
   Guha Prasad Venataraman, John Vollbrecht, Jun Wang, and Han Yin.

<span class="h2"><a class="selflink" id="section-8" href="#section-8">8</a>.  References</span>

<span class="h3"><a class="selflink" id="section-8.1" href="#section-8.1">8.1</a>.  Normative References</span>

   [<a id="ref-1">1</a>]    Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate
          Requirement Levels", <a href="https://www.rfc-editor.org/bcp/bcp14">BCP 14</a>, <a href="./rfc2119">RFC 2119</a>, March 1997.

   [<a id="ref-2">2</a>]    Berners-Lee, T., Fielding, R., and L. Masinter, "Uniform
          Resource Identifier (URI): Generic Syntax", STD 66, <a href="./rfc3986">RFC 3986</a>,
          January 2005.

   [<a id="ref-3">3</a>]    Phillips, A., Ed., and M. Davis, Ed., "Tags for Identifying
          Languages", <a href="https://www.rfc-editor.org/bcp/bcp47">BCP 47</a>, <a href="./rfc5646">RFC 5646</a>, September 2009.

   [<a id="ref-4">4</a>]    Alvestrand, H., "Content Language Headers", <a href="./rfc3282">RFC 3282</a>, May
          2002.

   [<a id="ref-5">5</a>]    Narten, T. and H. Alvestrand, "Guidelines for Writing an IANA
          Considerations Section in RFCs", <a href="https://www.rfc-editor.org/bcp/bcp26">BCP 26</a>, <a href="./rfc5226">RFC 5226</a>, May 2008.



<span class="grey">Sahita, et al.               Standards Track                   [Page 47]</span></pre>
<hr class='noprint'/><!--NewPage--><pre class='newpage'><span id="page-48" ></span>
<span class="grey"><a href="./rfc5793">RFC 5793</a>                         PB-TNC                       March 2010</span>


   [<a id="ref-6">6</a>]    Yergeau, F., "UTF-8, a transformation format of ISO 10646",
          STD 63, <a href="./rfc3629">RFC 3629</a>, November 2003.

<span class="h3"><a class="selflink" id="section-8.2" href="#section-8.2">8.2</a>.  Informative References</span>

   [<a id="ref-7">7</a>]    Hanna, S., Hurst, R. and R. Sahita, "TNC IF-TNCCS: TLV
          Binding", Trusted Computing Group, February 2008.

   [<a id="ref-8">8</a>]    Sangster, P., Khosravi, H., Mani, M., Narayan, K., and J.
          Tardo, "Network Endpoint Assessment (NEA): Overview and
          Requirements", <a href="./rfc5209">RFC 5209</a>, June 2008.

   [<a id="ref-9">9</a>]    Aboba, B., Blunk, L., Vollbrecht, J., Carlson, J., and H.
          Levkowetz, Ed., "Extensible Authentication Protocol (EAP)",
          <a href="./rfc3748">RFC 3748</a>, June 2004.

  [<a id="ref-10">10</a>]    Sangster, P., and K. Narayan, "PA-TNC: A Posture Attribute
          (PA) Protocol Compatible with Trusted Network Connect (TNC)",
          <a href="./rfc5792">RFC 5792</a>, March 2010.
































<span class="grey">Sahita, et al.               Standards Track                   [Page 48]</span></pre>
<hr class='noprint'/><!--NewPage--><pre class='newpage'><span id="page-49" ></span>
<span class="grey"><a href="./rfc5793">RFC 5793</a>                         PB-TNC                       March 2010</span>


<span class="h2"><a class="selflink" id="appendix-A" href="#appendix-A">Appendix A</a>.  Use Cases</span>

<span class="h3"><a class="selflink" id="appendix-A.1" href="#appendix-A.1">A.1</a>.  Initial Client-Triggered Assessment</span>

   This scenario involves the assessment of an endpoint initiated during
   network join.  The assessment is triggered by the Posture Broker
   Client (PBC) and involves collection of patch information from both
   Standard Operating System (OS) Posture Collector and vendor-specific
   Patch Posture Collector (PC).  The assessment by both the vendor-
   specific Patch Posture Validator (PV) and Standard OS Posture
   Validator result in a compliant assessment decision that results in a
   compliant System Assessment Decision to be returned by the Posture
   Broker Server (PBS).

   +--------+ +-------+ +---------+ +--------+ +-------++--------+

   | Vndr. X| |  Std. | |   Std.  | |  Std.  | | Std.  || Vndr. X|

   |Patch PC| | OS PC | |   PBC   | |  PBS   | | OS PV ||Patch PV|

   +----+---+ +---+---+ +-----+---+ +---+----+ +---+----++---+---+

      |         |   N/W Join|         |          |         |

      |         |     -----&gt;|         |          |         |

      |         | Req Post. |         |          |         |

      |         +&lt;----------+         |          |         |

      |         | Req Post. |         |          |         |

      +&lt;--------------------|         |          |         |

      |Vndr X Patch Posture |         |          |         |

      |--------------------&gt;|         |          |         |

      |         |OS Posture |         |          |         |

      |         |----------&gt;|         |          |         |

      |         |           | Posture |          |         |

      |         |           | Report  |          |         |

      |         |           +--------&gt;|          |         |




<span class="grey">Sahita, et al.               Standards Track                   [Page 49]</span></pre>
<hr class='noprint'/><!--NewPage--><pre class='newpage'><span id="page-50" ></span>
<span class="grey"><a href="./rfc5793">RFC 5793</a>                         PB-TNC                       March 2010</span>


      |         |           |         |  Verify  |         |

      |         |           |         |  Posture |         |

      |         |           |         |---------&gt;          |

      |         |           |         |          | Verify  |

      |         |           |         |          | Posture |

      |         |           |         |-------------------&gt;|

      |         |           |         | OS Reslt |         |

      |         |           |         |&lt;---------|         |

      |         |           |         | VndrX Patch Result |

      |         |           | Assess  |&lt;-------------------|

      |         |           | Result  |                    |

      |         |           &lt;---------|          |         |

      |         | OS PRslt  |         |          |         |

      |         |&lt;----------|         |          |         |

      | VndrX Patch PResult |         |          |         |

      |&lt;--------------------|         |          |         |


<span class="h4"><a class="selflink" id="appendix-A.1.1" href="#appendix-A.1.1">A.1.1</a>.  Message Contents</span>

   This section shows the contents of the key fields in each of the PA
   messages exchanged in this use case.  When necessary, additional
   commentary is provided to explain why certain fields contain the
   shown values.  Note that many of the flows shown are between
   components on the same system so no message contents are shown.

<span class="h5"><a class="selflink" id="appendix-A.1.1.1" href="#appendix-A.1.1.1">A.1.1.1</a>.  N/W Join</span>

   This flow represents the event that causes the PBC to decide to start
   an assessment of the endpoint in order to gain access to the network.
   This is merely an event and doesn't include a message being sent.





<span class="grey">Sahita, et al.               Standards Track                   [Page 50]</span></pre>
<hr class='noprint'/><!--NewPage--><pre class='newpage'><span id="page-51" ></span>
<span class="grey"><a href="./rfc5793">RFC 5793</a>                         PB-TNC                       March 2010</span>


<span class="h5"><a class="selflink" id="appendix-A.1.1.2" href="#appendix-A.1.1.2">A.1.1.2</a>.  Request Posture (Req Post.)</span>

   This flow illustrates an invocation of the OS and Patch Posture
   Collectors requesting particular posture attributes to be sent.
   Because this use case is triggered locally, NEA doesn't specify the
   contents of this flow.

<span class="h5"><a class="selflink" id="appendix-A.1.1.3" href="#appendix-A.1.1.3">A.1.1.3</a>.  Vendor X Patch Posture (VndrX Patch Posture)</span>

   This flow contains the PA message from the Vendor X Patch Posture
   Collector; the message content is described in the PA-TNC
   specification.

<span class="h5"><a class="selflink" id="appendix-A.1.1.4" href="#appendix-A.1.1.4">A.1.1.4</a>.  OS Posture</span>

   This flow contains the PA message from the OS Posture Collector; the
   message content is described in the PA-TNC specification.

<span class="h5"><a class="selflink" id="appendix-A.1.1.5" href="#appendix-A.1.1.5">A.1.1.5</a>.  Posture Report</span>

   This flow contains the PB message containing the PA messages from the
   Patch and OS Posture Collectors:

   PB Envelope {

    HDR {

     D bit=0 (Posture Broker Client is originator)

     Batch Type=CDATA

     Batch Length

     }

      PB Message 1 {

       Vendor-id=0

       Type =2 (PB-PA)

       Length

       Value = {

          PA-Msg-vendor-id=0 (Standard)

          PA-subtype=1 (OS)



<span class="grey">Sahita, et al.               Standards Track                   [Page 51]</span></pre>
<hr class='noprint'/><!--NewPage--><pre class='newpage'><span id="page-52" ></span>
<span class="grey"><a href="./rfc5793">RFC 5793</a>                         PB-TNC                       March 2010</span>


          OS Posture PA Message

       }

     }

     PB Message 2 {

       Vendor-id=0

       Type =2 (PB-PA)

       Length

       Value = {

          PA-Msg-vendor-id=1 (Vendor X)

          PA-subtype=1 (Vendor X PA sub-type for patch management)

          Vendor X Patch Posture PA Message

        }

      }

   }

<span class="h5"><a class="selflink" id="appendix-A.1.1.6" href="#appendix-A.1.1.6">A.1.1.6</a>.  Verify Posture</span>

   This flow illustrates an invocation of the OS and Patch Posture
   Validators requesting verification of the posture attributes
   received.  Because this flow happens locally within the NEA server,
   NEA doesn't specify the message content.

<span class="h5"><a class="selflink" id="appendix-A.1.1.7" href="#appendix-A.1.1.7">A.1.1.7</a>.  OS Posture Result (OS Reslt)</span>

   This flow contains the PA message (Posture Assessment Result) from
   the OS Posture Validator; the message content is described in the PA-
   TNC specification.

<span class="h5"><a class="selflink" id="appendix-A.1.1.8" href="#appendix-A.1.1.8">A.1.1.8</a>.  Vendor X Patch Posture Result (VndrX Patch Result)</span>

   This flow contains the PA message (Posture Assessment Result) from
   the Vendor X Patch Posture Validator; the message content is
   described in the PA-TNC specification.





<span class="grey">Sahita, et al.               Standards Track                   [Page 52]</span></pre>
<hr class='noprint'/><!--NewPage--><pre class='newpage'><span id="page-53" ></span>
<span class="grey"><a href="./rfc5793">RFC 5793</a>                         PB-TNC                       March 2010</span>


<span class="h5"><a class="selflink" id="appendix-A.1.1.9" href="#appendix-A.1.1.9">A.1.1.9</a>.  Assessment Result (Assess Result)</span>

   This flow contains the PB message containing the system assessment
   result computed by the Posture Broker Server and the PA messages from
   the Patch and OS Posture Validators:

   PB Envelope {

    HDR {

     D bit=1 (Posture Broker Server is originator)

     Batch Type=RESULT

     Batch Length

     }

      PB Message 1 {

       Vendor-id=0,

       Type =3 (Access-Recommendation)

       Length

       Value = {

         System-Evaluation-Result=0 (Compliant)

       }

     }

     PB Message 2 {

       Vendor-id=0,

       Type=2 (PB-PA)

       Length

       Value = {

          PA-Msg-vendor-id=0

          PA-subtype=1 (OS)




<span class="grey">Sahita, et al.               Standards Track                   [Page 53]</span></pre>
<hr class='noprint'/><!--NewPage--><pre class='newpage'><span id="page-54" ></span>
<span class="grey"><a href="./rfc5793">RFC 5793</a>                         PB-TNC                       March 2010</span>


          OS Posture Result PA Message

        }

      }

     PB Message 3 {

       Vendor-id=0,

       Type=2 (PB-PA)

       Length

       Value = {

          PA-Msg-vendor-id=1 (Vendor X)

          PA-subtype=1 (Vendor X PA sub-type for patch management)

          Vendor X Patch Posture Result PA Message

        }

      }

   }

<span class="h5"><a class="selflink" id="appendix-A.1.1.10" href="#appendix-A.1.1.10">A.1.1.10</a>.  Posture Result (OS PRslt &amp; Vndr X Post PResult)</span>

   These flows illustrate an invocation of the OS and Vendor X Patch
   Posture Collectors to receive the posture assessment results.
   Because this flow is triggered locally, NEA doesn't specify the
   contents of this flow.

<span class="h3"><a class="selflink" id="appendix-A.2" href="#appendix-A.2">A.2</a>.  Server-Initiated Assessment with Remediation</span>

   This scenario involves the assessment of an endpoint initiated by the
   NEA server.  The assessment is triggered by the Posture Broker Server
   and involves collection of Anti-Virus attributes for two Anti-Virus
   components running on the endpoint.  The endpoint is assessed to be
   compliant by one of the vendor (Vendor X) anti-virus posture
   validators and non-compliant by the other vendor (Vendor Y) anti-
   virus posture validator.  This results in a non-compliant System
   Assessment Decision to be returned by the Posture Broker Server.  The
   Posture Broker Server also returns remediation instructions for the
   endpoint as part of the response.




<span class="grey">Sahita, et al.               Standards Track                   [Page 54]</span></pre>
<hr class='noprint'/><!--NewPage--><pre class='newpage'><span id="page-55" ></span>
<span class="grey"><a href="./rfc5793">RFC 5793</a>                         PB-TNC                       March 2010</span>


   +--------+  +-------+ +---------+ +--------+ +-------+ +--------+

   | Vndr Y |  | Vndr X| |   Std.  | |  Std.  | | Vndr X| | Vndr Y |

   |  AV PC |  | AV PC | |   PBC   | |  PBS   | | AV PV | |  AV PV |

   +----+---+  +---+---+ +-----+---+ +---+----+ +---+---+ +----+---+

        |          |           | N/W Join|          |          |

        |          |           |   -----&gt;|          |          |

        |          |           |         |  Create  |          |

        |          |           |         |Post. Req |          |

        |          |           |         |---------&gt;|          |

        |          |           |         |Create Posture Req   |

        |          |           |         |----------+---------&gt;|

        |          |           |         |Vndr Y AV Posture Req|

        |          |           |         |&lt;---------+----------|

        |          |           |         |Vndr X AV |          |

        |          |           |         |Post. Req |          |

        |          |           | Posture |&lt;---------|          |

        |          |           | Request |          |          |

        |          | Vndr X AV |&lt;--------|          |          |

        |          | Post. Req |         |          |          |

        |          |&lt;----------|         |          |          |

        |      Vndr Y AV       |         |          |          |

        |     Posture Req      |         |          |          |

        +&lt;---------+-----------|         |          |          |

        |  Vndr Y AV Posture   |         |          |          |




<span class="grey">Sahita, et al.               Standards Track                   [Page 55]</span></pre>
<hr class='noprint'/><!--NewPage--><pre class='newpage'><span id="page-56" ></span>
<span class="grey"><a href="./rfc5793">RFC 5793</a>                         PB-TNC                       March 2010</span>


        +----------+----------&gt;|         |          |          |

        |          | Vndr X AV |         |          |          |

        |          |  Posture  |         |          |          |

        |          |----------&gt;| Posture |          |          |

        |          |           |Response |          |          |

        |          |           |--------&gt;|          |          |

        |          |           |         |  Verify  |          |

        |          |           |         |  Posture |          |

        |          |           |         |---------&gt;|          |

        |          |           |         |     Verify Posture  |

        |          |           |         |----------+---------&gt;|

        |          |           |         |Vndr Y Posture Result|

        |          |           |         |&lt;---------+----------|

        |          |           |         |Vndr X AV |          |

        |          |           |         |Post Reslt|          |

        |          |           |  Assess |&lt;---------|          |

        |          |           |  Result |          |          |

        |          | Vndr X AV |&lt;--------|          |          |

        |          |Post Reslt |&lt;--------|          |          |

        |          |&lt;----------|         |          |          |

        | Vndr Y AV Post Reslt |         |          |          |

        +&lt;---------+-----------|         |          |          |

        |          |           |         |          |          |






<span class="grey">Sahita, et al.               Standards Track                   [Page 56]</span></pre>
<hr class='noprint'/><!--NewPage--><pre class='newpage'><span id="page-57" ></span>
<span class="grey"><a href="./rfc5793">RFC 5793</a>                         PB-TNC                       March 2010</span>


<span class="h4"><a class="selflink" id="appendix-A.2.1" href="#appendix-A.2.1">A.2.1</a>.  Message Contents</span>

   This section shows the contents of the key fields in each of the PA
   messages exchanged in this use case.  When necessary, additional
   commentary is provided to explain why certain fields contain the
   shown values.  Note that many of the flows shown are between
   components on the same system so no message contents are shown.

<span class="h5"><a class="selflink" id="appendix-A.2.1.1" href="#appendix-A.2.1.1">A.2.1.1</a>.  N/W Join</span>

   This flow represents the event that causes the PBS to decide to start
   an assessment of the endpoint in order to gain access to the network.
   This is merely an event and doesn't include a message being sent.

<span class="h5"><a class="selflink" id="appendix-A.2.1.2" href="#appendix-A.2.1.2">A.2.1.2</a>.  Create Posture Request (Create Posture Req)</span>

   This flow illustrates an invocation of the Vendor X and Vendor Y
   Anti-Virus posture validators requesting posture requests to be
   created.  Because this use case is triggered locally, NEA doesn't
   specify the contents of this flow.

<span class="h5"><a class="selflink" id="appendix-A.2.1.3" href="#appendix-A.2.1.3">A.2.1.3</a>.  Vendor X Anti-Virus Posture Request (Vndr X AV Post. Req)</span>

   This flow contains the PA message (Posture Request) from the Vendor X
   Anti-Virus Posture Validator; the message content is described in the
   PA-TNC specification.

<span class="h5"><a class="selflink" id="appendix-A.2.1.4" href="#appendix-A.2.1.4">A.2.1.4</a>.  Vendor Y Anti-Virus Posture Request</span>

   This flow contains the PA message (Posture Request) from the Vendor Y
   Anti-Virus Posture Validator; the message content is described in the
   PA-TNC specification.

<span class="h5"><a class="selflink" id="appendix-A.2.1.5" href="#appendix-A.2.1.5">A.2.1.5</a>.  Posture Request</span>

   This flow contains the PB message containing the PA messages from the
   Vendor X and Vendor Y Anti-Virus Posture Validators:

   PB Envelope {

    HDR {

     D bit=1 (Posture Broker Server is originator)

     Batch Type=SDATA

     Batch Length




<span class="grey">Sahita, et al.               Standards Track                   [Page 57]</span></pre>
<hr class='noprint'/><!--NewPage--><pre class='newpage'><span id="page-58" ></span>
<span class="grey"><a href="./rfc5793">RFC 5793</a>                         PB-TNC                       March 2010</span>


    }

     PB Message 1 {

       Vendor-id=0

       Type =2 (PB-PA)

       Length

       Value = {

          PA-Msg-vendor-id=1 (Vendor X)

          PA-subtype=2 (Vendor X PA sub-type for Anti-Virus)

          Vendor X AV Posture Request PA Message

       }

     }

     PB Message 2 {

       Vendor-id=0

       Type =2 (PB-PA)

       Length

       Value = {

          PA-Msg-vendor-id=2 (Vendor Y)

          PA-subtype=1 (Vendor Y PA sub-type for Anti-Virus)

          Vendor Y AV Posture Request PA Message

        }

      }

   }








<span class="grey">Sahita, et al.               Standards Track                   [Page 58]</span></pre>
<hr class='noprint'/><!--NewPage--><pre class='newpage'><span id="page-59" ></span>
<span class="grey"><a href="./rfc5793">RFC 5793</a>                         PB-TNC                       March 2010</span>


<span class="h5"><a class="selflink" id="appendix-A.2.1.6" href="#appendix-A.2.1.6">A.2.1.6</a>.  Process Posture Request (Vndr X AV Post Req &amp; Vndr Y AV</span>
          Posture Req)

   This flow illustrates an invocation of the Vendor X and Vendor Y
   Anti-Virus Posture Collectors to process the Posture Request and
   return particular posture attributes requested.  Because this use
   case is triggered locally, NEA doesn't specify the contents of this
   flow.

<span class="h5"><a class="selflink" id="appendix-A.2.1.7" href="#appendix-A.2.1.7">A.2.1.7</a>.  Vendor Y Anti-Virus Posture (Vndr Y AV Posture)</span>

   This flow contains the PA message (response to the Posture Request)
   from the Vendor Y Anti-Virus Posture Collector; the message content
   is described in the PA-TNC specification.

<span class="h5"><a class="selflink" id="appendix-A.2.1.8" href="#appendix-A.2.1.8">A.2.1.8</a>.  Vendor X Anti-Virus Posture (Vndr X AV Posture)</span>

   This flow contains the PA message (response to the Posture Request)
   from the Vendor X Anti-Virus Posture Collector; the message content
   is described in the PA-TNC specification.

<span class="h5"><a class="selflink" id="appendix-A.2.1.9" href="#appendix-A.2.1.9">A.2.1.9</a>.  Posture Response</span>

   This flow contains the PB message containing the PA messages from the
   Vendor X and Vendor Y Anti-Virus Posture Collectors:

   PB Envelope {

    HDR {

     D bit=0 (Posture Broker Client is originator)

     Batch Type=CDATA

     Batch Length

    }

     PB Message 1 {

       Vendor-id=0

       Type =2 (PB-PA)

       Length

       Value = {




<span class="grey">Sahita, et al.               Standards Track                   [Page 59]</span></pre>
<hr class='noprint'/><!--NewPage--><pre class='newpage'><span id="page-60" ></span>
<span class="grey"><a href="./rfc5793">RFC 5793</a>                         PB-TNC                       March 2010</span>


           PA-Msg-vendor-id=1 (Vendor X)

           PA-subtype=2 (Vendor X PA sub-type for Anti-Virus)

           Vendor X AV Posture PA Message

       }

     }

     PB Message 2 {

       Vendor-id=0

       Type =2 (PB-PA)

       Length

       Value = {

           PA-Msg-vendor-id=2 (Vendor Y)

           PA-subtype=1 (Vendor Y PA sub-type for Anti-Virus)

           Vendor Y AV Posture PA Message

        }

      }

   }

<span class="h5"><a class="selflink" id="appendix-A.2.1.10" href="#appendix-A.2.1.10">A.2.1.10</a>.  Verify Posture</span>

   This flow illustrates an invocation of the Vendor X and Vendor Y
   Anti-Virus Posture Validators requesting verification of the posture
   attributes received.  Because this flow happens locally within the
   NEA server, NEA doesn't specify the message contents.

<span class="h5"><a class="selflink" id="appendix-A.2.1.11" href="#appendix-A.2.1.11">A.2.1.11</a>.  Vendor Y Anti-Virus Posture Result (Vndr Y AV Post Result)</span>

   This flow contains the PA message (Posture Assessment Result) from
   the Vendor Y Anti-Virus Posture Validator; the message content is
   described in the PA-TNC specification.







<span class="grey">Sahita, et al.               Standards Track                   [Page 60]</span></pre>
<hr class='noprint'/><!--NewPage--><pre class='newpage'><span id="page-61" ></span>
<span class="grey"><a href="./rfc5793">RFC 5793</a>                         PB-TNC                       March 2010</span>


<span class="h5"><a class="selflink" id="appendix-A.2.1.12" href="#appendix-A.2.1.12">A.2.1.12</a>.  Vendor X Anti-Virus Posture Result (Vndr Y AV Post Result)</span>

   This flow contains the PA message (Posture Assessment Result) from
   the Vendor X Anti-Virus Posture Validator; the message content is
   described in the PA-TNC specification.

<span class="h5"><a class="selflink" id="appendix-A.2.1.13" href="#appendix-A.2.1.13">A.2.1.13</a>.  Assessment Result (Assess Result)</span>

   This flow contains the PB message containing the system assessment
   result computed by the Posture Broker Server and the PA messages from
   the Patch and OS Posture Validators:

   PB Envelope {

    HDR {

     D bit=1 (Posture Broker Server is originator)

     Batch Type=RESULT

     Batch Length

    }

     PB Message 1 {

       Vendor-id=0,

       Type=3 (Access-Recommendation)

       Length

       Value = {

         PB-Assessment-Result=1 (Non-Compliant)

       }

     }

     PB Message 2 {

       Vendor-id=0,

       Type=4 (Remediation-Parameters)

       Length




<span class="grey">Sahita, et al.               Standards Track                   [Page 61]</span></pre>
<hr class='noprint'/><!--NewPage--><pre class='newpage'><span id="page-62" ></span>
<span class="grey"><a href="./rfc5793">RFC 5793</a>                         PB-TNC                       March 2010</span>


       Value = {

        Remediation-Param-Vendor-ID=0

        Remediation-Param-Type=1 (Remediation-URI)

        Remediation-Param=''http://xyz''

        }

      }

    PB Message 3 {

       Vendor-id=0,

       Type=4 (Remediation-Parameters)

       Length

       Value = {

        Remediation-Param-Vendor-ID=0

        Remediation-Param-Type=2 (Remediation-String)

        Remediation-Param=''Try Step1, Step2,...''

        }

      }

     PB Message 4 {

       Vendor-id=0,

       Type=2 (PB-PA)

       Length

       Value = {

           PA-Msg-vendor-id=1 (Vendor X)

           PA-subtype=2 (Vendor X PA sub-type for Anti-Virus)

           Vendor X AV Posture Result PA Message




<span class="grey">Sahita, et al.               Standards Track                   [Page 62]</span></pre>
<hr class='noprint'/><!--NewPage--><pre class='newpage'><span id="page-63" ></span>
<span class="grey"><a href="./rfc5793">RFC 5793</a>                         PB-TNC                       March 2010</span>


        }

      }

     PB Message 5 {

       Vendor-id=0,

       Type=2 (PB-PA)

       Length

       Value = {

           PA-Msg-vendor-id=2 (Vendor Y)

           PA-subtype=1 (Vendor Y PA sub-type for Anti-Virus)

           Vendor Y AV Posture Result PA Message

        }

      }

   }

<span class="h5"><a class="selflink" id="appendix-A.2.1.14" href="#appendix-A.2.1.14">A.2.1.14</a>.  Posture Result (Vndr X AV Post Reslt &amp; Vndr Y AV Post Reslt)</span>

   These flows illustrate an invocation of the Vendor X and Vendor Y
   Anti-Virus Posture Collectors to receive the posture assessment
   results.  Because this flow is triggered locally, NEA doesn't specify
   the contents of this flow.

<span class="h3"><a class="selflink" id="appendix-A.3" href="#appendix-A.3">A.3</a>.  Client-Triggered Reassessment</span>

   This scenario involves the reassessment of an endpoint as a result of
   enabling a software component on the endpoint.  The endpoint has two
   VPN client software components, one from vendor X for the user's home
   network and other from vendor Y for the network that the endpoint is
   currently accessing.  The assessment is triggered when the user tries
   to use the Vendor X VPN client; this is a violation of the posture
   policy.  The Posture Broker Client triggers the posture assessment
   when it receives a notification from the Standard VPN Posture
   Collector about the change to the operational state of the VPN
   component on the endpoint.  Note that the VPN Posture Collector
   supports standard attributes and some vendor-defined attributes from
   vendor X's and vendor Y's namespaces.  This use case doesn't leverage
   vendor-defined attributes.  The assessment involves verification of



<span class="grey">Sahita, et al.               Standards Track                   [Page 63]</span></pre>
<hr class='noprint'/><!--NewPage--><pre class='newpage'><span id="page-64" ></span>
<span class="grey"><a href="./rfc5793">RFC 5793</a>                         PB-TNC                       March 2010</span>


   the standard VPN posture attributes by the Standard VPN Posture
   Validator that results in a non-compliant assessment result.  This
   use case relies on the use of a virtual Posture Collector concept
   described in <a href="#section-3.3">section 3.3</a> of the PA-TNC specification.  As illustrated
   in this example, the Posture Broker Client will assign two Posture
   Collector IDs to a single Posture Collector (Standard VPN PC), and
   the Posture Collector will generate two separate PA messages to
   report the posture for Vendor X and Vendor Y VPN Clients.  The
   Posture Broker Client will use the assigned IDs in the PB message
   sent to the NEA Server.  This entire behavior will be completely
   opaque to the NEA Server, which will handle the PB message as if
   there were two VPN Posture Collectors on the NEA Client.

   +--------+  +-------+ +---------+ +--------+ +--------+ +--------+

   |Vndr X  |  |Vndr Y | |Standard | |Standard| |Standard| |Standard|

   |VPNClnt |  |VPNClnt| | VPN PC  | |  PBC   | |   PBS  | | VPN PV |

   +----+---+  +---+---+ +-----+---+ +---+----+ +---+----+ +----+---+
   Enble|          |           |         |          |           |

   ----&gt;|          |           |         |          |           |

        |  VPN Status Change   |         |          |           |

        |---------------------&gt;| Posture |          |           |

        |          |           | Change  |          |           |

        |          |           |--------&gt;|          |           |

        |          |           |Req. Post|          |           |

        |          |           |&lt;--------|          |           |

        |          |Ins/Rq Info|         |          |           |

        |          |&lt;----------|         |          |           |

        | Inspect/Request Info |         |          |           |

        |&lt;---------+-----------|VPNX Post|          |           |

        |          |           |--------&gt;|          |           |

        |          |           |VPNY Post|          |           |




<span class="grey">Sahita, et al.               Standards Track                   [Page 64]</span></pre>
<hr class='noprint'/><!--NewPage--><pre class='newpage'><span id="page-65" ></span>
<span class="grey"><a href="./rfc5793">RFC 5793</a>                         PB-TNC                       March 2010</span>


        |          |           |--------&gt;|          |           |

        |          |           |         | Posture  |           |

        |          |           |         |  Report  |           |

        |          |           |         |---------&gt;|           |

        |          |           |         |          |Vrfy Post. |

        |          |           |         |          |----------&gt;|

        |          |           |         |          |VPN PRslt  |

        |          |           |         |  Assess  |&lt;----------|

        |          |           |         |  Result  |           |

        |          |           |         |&lt;---------|           |

        |          |           |VPN PRslt|          |           |

        |          |           |&lt;--------|          |           |

<span class="h4"><a class="selflink" id="appendix-A.3.1" href="#appendix-A.3.1">A.3.1</a>.  Message Contents</span>

   This section shows the contents of the key fields in each of the PA
   messages exchanged in this use case.  When necessary, additional
   commentary is provided to explain why certain fields contain the
   shown values.  Note that many of the flows shown are between
   components on the same system so no message contents are shown.

<span class="h5"><a class="selflink" id="appendix-A.3.1.1" href="#appendix-A.3.1.1">A.3.1.1</a>.  Enable VPN Client (Enble)</span>

   This flow represents the end user triggered event of starting the VPN
   Client software from Vendor X.  This is merely an event and doesn't
   include a message being sent.

<span class="h5"><a class="selflink" id="appendix-A.3.1.2" href="#appendix-A.3.1.2">A.3.1.2</a>.  Notify Status Change (VPN Status Change)</span>

   This flow represents the detection of the active state of the Vendor
   X VPN Client software by the Standard VPN Posture Collector.  This is
   merely an event and doesn't include a message being sent.








<span class="grey">Sahita, et al.               Standards Track                   [Page 65]</span></pre>
<hr class='noprint'/><!--NewPage--><pre class='newpage'><span id="page-66" ></span>
<span class="grey"><a href="./rfc5793">RFC 5793</a>                         PB-TNC                       March 2010</span>


<span class="h5"><a class="selflink" id="appendix-A.3.1.3" href="#appendix-A.3.1.3">A.3.1.3</a>.  Notify Posture Change (Posture Change)</span>

   This flow represents the notification of the VPN Posture change sent
   from the VPN Posture Collector to the Standard Posture Broker Client.
   This is merely an event and doesn't include a message being sent.

<span class="h5"><a class="selflink" id="appendix-A.3.1.4" href="#appendix-A.3.1.4">A.3.1.4</a>.  Request Posture (Req. Post)</span>

   This flow illustrates an invocation of the VPN Posture Collector
   requesting particular posture attributes to be sent.  Because this
   use case is triggered locally, the contents of this flow aren't
   specified by NEA.

<span class="h5"><a class="selflink" id="appendix-A.3.1.5" href="#appendix-A.3.1.5">A.3.1.5</a>.  Inspect/Request Information (Ins/Rq Info)</span>

   This flow illustrates the acquisition of the posture attributes by
   the Standard VPN Posture Collector from the Vendor X and Vendor Y VPN
   Client components.  Because this flow is triggered locally, NEA
   doesn't specify the message contents.

<span class="h5"><a class="selflink" id="appendix-A.3.1.6" href="#appendix-A.3.1.6">A.3.1.6</a>.  Vendor X VPN Posture (VPNX Post.)</span>

   This flow contains the PA message from the VPN Posture Collector for
   Vendor X VPN Client posture; the message content is described in the
   PA-TNC specification.

<span class="h5"><a class="selflink" id="appendix-A.3.1.7" href="#appendix-A.3.1.7">A.3.1.7</a>.  Vendor Y VPN Posture (VPNY Post.)</span>

   This flow contains the PA message from the VPN Posture Collector for
   Vendor Y VPN Client posture; the message content is described in the
   PA-TNC specification.

<span class="h5"><a class="selflink" id="appendix-A.3.1.8" href="#appendix-A.3.1.8">A.3.1.8</a>.  Posture Report (Post. Rpt.)</span>

   This flow contains the PB message containing the PA message from the
   VPN Posture Collector:

   PB Envelope {

    HDR {

     D bit=0 (Posture Broker Client is originator)

     Batch Type=CRETRY

     Batch Length

    }



<span class="grey">Sahita, et al.               Standards Track                   [Page 66]</span></pre>
<hr class='noprint'/><!--NewPage--><pre class='newpage'><span id="page-67" ></span>
<span class="grey"><a href="./rfc5793">RFC 5793</a>                         PB-TNC                       March 2010</span>


     PB Message 1 {

       Vendor-id=0

       Type =2 (PB-PA)

       Length

       Value = {

          PA-Msg-vendor-id=0

          PA-subtype=7 (VPN)

          Posture-Collector-ID=1 //Virtual Posture Collector ID for
   Vendor X VPN Client

          Vendor X VPN Posture PA Message

       }

     }

     PB Message 2 {

       Vendor-id=0

       Type =2 (PB-PA)

       Length

       Value = {

          PA-Msg-vendor-id=0

          PA-subtype=7 (VPN)

          Posture-Collector-ID=2 //Virtual Posture Collector ID for
   Vendor Y VPN Client

          Vendor Y VPN Posture PA Message

       }

     }






<span class="grey">Sahita, et al.               Standards Track                   [Page 67]</span></pre>
<hr class='noprint'/><!--NewPage--><pre class='newpage'><span id="page-68" ></span>
<span class="grey"><a href="./rfc5793">RFC 5793</a>                         PB-TNC                       March 2010</span>


<span class="h5"><a class="selflink" id="appendix-A.3.1.9" href="#appendix-A.3.1.9">A.3.1.9</a>.  Verify Posture (Vrfy Post.)</span>

   This flow illustrates an invocation of the VPN Posture Validator
   requesting verification of the posture attributes received.  Because
   this flow happens locally within the NEA server, NEA doesn't specify
   the message contents.

<span class="h5"><a class="selflink" id="appendix-A.3.1.10" href="#appendix-A.3.1.10">A.3.1.10</a>.  VPN Posture Result (VPN PRslt)</span>

   This flow contains the PA message (Posture Assessment Result) from
   the VPN Posture Validator; the message content is described in the
   PA-TNC specification.

<span class="h5"><a class="selflink" id="appendix-A.3.1.11" href="#appendix-A.3.1.11">A.3.1.11</a>.  Assessment Result (Assess Result)</span>

   This flow contains the PB message containing the system assessment
   result computed by the Posture Broker Server and the PA messages from
   the VPN Posture Validator:

    PB Envelope {

      HDR {

       D bit=1 (Posture Broker Server is originator)

       Batch Type=RESULT

       Batch Length

      }


     PB Message 1 {

       Vendor-id=0,

       Type =3 (Access-Recommendation)

       Length

       Value = {

         PB-Assessment-Result=1 (Non-Compliant)

       }

     }




<span class="grey">Sahita, et al.               Standards Track                   [Page 68]</span></pre>
<hr class='noprint'/><!--NewPage--><pre class='newpage'><span id="page-69" ></span>
<span class="grey"><a href="./rfc5793">RFC 5793</a>                         PB-TNC                       March 2010</span>


     PB Message 2 {

       Vendor-id=0,

       Type=2 (PB-PA)

       Length

       Value = {

          PA-Msg-vendor-id=0

          PA-subtype=7 (VPN)

          VPN Posture Result PA Message

        }

      }

<span class="h5"><a class="selflink" id="appendix-A.3.1.12" href="#appendix-A.3.1.12">A.3.1.12</a>.  Posture Result (VPN PRslt)</span>

   This flow illustrate an invocation of the VPN Posture Collectors to
   receive the posture assessment result.  Because this flow is
   triggered locally, NEA doesn't specify the contents of this flow.


























<span class="grey">Sahita, et al.               Standards Track                   [Page 69]</span></pre>
<hr class='noprint'/><!--NewPage--><pre class='newpage'><span id="page-70" ></span>
<span class="grey"><a href="./rfc5793">RFC 5793</a>                         PB-TNC                       March 2010</span>


<span class="h2"><a class="selflink" id="appendix-B" href="#appendix-B">Appendix B</a>.  Evaluation against NEA Requirements</span>

   This section evaluates the PB-TNC protocol against the requirements
   defined in the NEA Requirements document.  Each subsection considers
   a separate requirement from the NEA Requirements document.  Only
   common requirements (C-1 through C-11) and PB requirements (PB-1
   through PB-6) are considered, since these are the only ones that
   apply to PB.

<span class="h3"><a class="selflink" id="appendix-B.1" href="#appendix-B.1">B.1</a>.  Evaluation against Requirement C-1</span>

   Requirement C-1 says:

   C-1   NEA protocols MUST support multiple round trips between the NEA
         Client and NEA Server in a single assessment.

   PB-TNC meets this requirement.  It allows an unlimited number of
   round trips between the NEA Client and NEA Server.

<span class="h3"><a class="selflink" id="appendix-B.2" href="#appendix-B.2">B.2</a>.  Evaluation against Requirement C-2</span>

   Requirement C-2 says:

   C-2   NEA protocols SHOULD provide a way for both the NEA Client and
         the NEA Server to initiate a posture assessment or reassessment
         as needed.

   PB-TNC meets this requirement.  Either the NEA Client or the NEA
   Server can initiate a posture assessment or reassessment.

   There is one limitation on this support.  If a NEA Server wishes to
   initiate a reassessment after it has sent a RESULT batch, it must
   close the underlying transport session and initiate a new assessment.
   For half-duplex transports, this is unavoidable unless a constant
   exchange of messages is maintained, which would be very wasteful.
   For full-duplex transports, it would be possible to allow the Posture
   Broker Server to send an SRETRY batch even in the Decided state.  If
   the NEA working group reaches consensus that this change should be
   made, it will be.

<span class="h3"><a class="selflink" id="appendix-B.3" href="#appendix-B.3">B.3</a>.  Evaluation against Requirement C-3</span>

   Requirement C-3 says:

   C-3   NEA protocols including security capabilities MUST be capable
         of protecting against active and passive attacks by
         intermediaries and endpoints including prevention from replay-
         based attacks.



<span class="grey">Sahita, et al.               Standards Track                   [Page 70]</span></pre>
<hr class='noprint'/><!--NewPage--><pre class='newpage'><span id="page-71" ></span>
<span class="grey"><a href="./rfc5793">RFC 5793</a>                         PB-TNC                       March 2010</span>


   PB-TNC does not include any security capabilities.  It depends on PT
   to supply a secure transport.  This addresses all the necessary
   threats without adding an extra layer of security.  Since this
   requirement only applies to NEA protocols that include security
   capabilities, PB-TNC meets this requirement.

<span class="h3"><a class="selflink" id="appendix-B.4" href="#appendix-B.4">B.4</a>.  Evaluation against Requirement C-4</span>

   Requirement C-4 says:

   C-4   The PA and PB protocols MUST be capable of operating over any
         PT protocol.  For example, the PB protocol must provide a
         transport-independent interface allowing the PA protocol to
         operate without change across a variety of network protocol
         environments (e.g., EAP/802.1X, PANA, TLS, and IKE/IPsec).

   PB-TNC meets this requirement.  PB-TNC can operate over any PT
   protocol that meets the requirements for PT stated in the NEA
   Requirements document.  Also, PB-TNC insulates the PA protocol from
   any specifics of the PT protocol.  With PB-TNC, all PT protocols are
   equivalent from the perspective of the PA protocol.

<span class="h3"><a class="selflink" id="appendix-B.5" href="#appendix-B.5">B.5</a>.  Evaluation against Requirement C-5</span>

   Requirement C-5 says:

   C-5   The selection process for NEA protocols MUST evaluate and
         prefer the reuse of existing open standards that meet the
         requirements before defining new ones.  The goal of NEA is not
         to create additional alternative protocols where acceptable
         solutions already exist.

   Based on this requirement, PB-TNC should receive a strong preference.
   PB-TNC is equivalent with IF-TNCCS 2.0, an open TCG specification.
   IF-TNCCS 2.0 is an extension of the existing IF-TNCCS 1.X protocols,
   which have been implemented by dozens of vendors and open source
   projects.

<span class="h3"><a class="selflink" id="appendix-B.6" href="#appendix-B.6">B.6</a>.  Evaluation against Requirement C-6</span>

   Requirement C-6 says:

   C-6   NEA protocols MUST be highly scalable; the protocols MUST
         support many Posture Collectors on a large number of NEA
         Clients to be assessed by numerous Posture Validators residing
         on multiple NEA Servers.





<span class="grey">Sahita, et al.               Standards Track                   [Page 71]</span></pre>
<hr class='noprint'/><!--NewPage--><pre class='newpage'><span id="page-72" ></span>
<span class="grey"><a href="./rfc5793">RFC 5793</a>                         PB-TNC                       March 2010</span>


   PB-TNC meets this requirement.  PB-TNC supports up to 2^16-1 Posture
   Collectors and an equal number of Posture Validators in a given PB-
   TNC session.  It also supports an unlimited number of NEA Clients and
   NEA Servers.

   The scalability of PB-TNC extends into other areas as well.  For
   example, PB-TNC supports an unlimited number of batches and each
   batch can contain up to 2^32-1 octets and about 2^24 PA messages.
   Each PA message can contain up to 2^32-1 octets.  Of course, sending
   this much data in a NEA assessment is not generally advisable, but
   the point is that PB-TNC is highly scalable.

<span class="h3"><a class="selflink" id="appendix-B.7" href="#appendix-B.7">B.7</a>.  Evaluation against Requirement C-7</span>

   Requirement C-7 says:

   C-7   The protocols MUST support efficient transport of a large
         number of attribute messages between the NEA Client and the NEA
         Server.

   PB-TNC meets this requirement.  Each PB-TNC batch can contain about
   2^24 PA messages.  Since PB-TNC supports an unlimited number of
   batches in a session, this number is actually unlimited (except
   perhaps by PT protocols, user patience, or other external factors).
   As for efficiency, PB-TNC adds only 24 octets of overhead per PA
   message.  PA-TNC can include many attributes in a single PA message
   so this overhead is diluted further.

<span class="h3"><a class="selflink" id="appendix-B.8" href="#appendix-B.8">B.8</a>.  Evaluation against Requirement C-8</span>

   Requirement C-8 says:

   C-8   NEA protocols MUST operate efficiently over low bandwidth or
         high latency links.

   PB-TNC meets this requirement.  A minimal PB-TNC exchange can be as
   small as 72 octets and one round trip.  Even if privacy policies or
   other factors require multiple round trips, PB-TNC generally imposes
   an overhead of only 8 octets per batch and 24 octets per PA message.

<span class="h3"><a class="selflink" id="appendix-B.9" href="#appendix-B.9">B.9</a>.  Evaluation against Requirement C-9</span>

   Requirement C-9 says:

   C-9   For any strings intended for display to a user, the protocols
         MUST support adapting these strings to the user's language
         preferences.




<span class="grey">Sahita, et al.               Standards Track                   [Page 72]</span></pre>
<hr class='noprint'/><!--NewPage--><pre class='newpage'><span id="page-73" ></span>
<span class="grey"><a href="./rfc5793">RFC 5793</a>                         PB-TNC                       March 2010</span>


         PB-TNC meets this requirement.  It defines a standard way for
         the NEA Client and NEA Server to send their language
         preferences to each other, leveraging the widely implemented
         Accept-Language format defined in <a href="./rfc3282">RFC 3282</a>.

<span class="h3"><a class="selflink" id="appendix-B.10" href="#appendix-B.10">B.10</a>.  Evaluation against Requirement C-10</span>

   Requirement C-10 says:

   C-10  NEA protocols MUST support encoding of strings in UTF-8 format.

   PB-TNC meets this requirement.  All strings in the PB-TNC protocol
   are encoded in UTF-8 format.  This allows the protocol to support a
   wide range of languages efficiently.

<span class="h3"><a class="selflink" id="appendix-B.11" href="#appendix-B.11">B.11</a>.  Evaluation against Requirement C-11</span>

   Requirement C-11 says:

   C-11  Due to the potentially different transport characteristics
         provided by the underlying candidate PT protocols, the NEA
         Client and NEA Server MUST be capable of becoming aware of and
         adapting to the limitations of the available PT protocol.  For
         example, some PT protocol characteristics that might impact the
         operation of PA and PB include restrictions on which end can
         initiate a NEA connection, maximum data size in a message or
         full assessment, upper bound on number of round trips, and
         ordering (duplex) of messages exchanged.  The selection process
         for the PT protocols MUST consider the limitations the
         candidate PT protocol would impose upon the PA and PB
         protocols.

   PB-TNC meets this requirement.  The PB-TNC protocol is designed to be
   flexible enough to operate with a variety of underlying PT protocols,
   including those that may have limitations on message or assessment
   size, number of round trips, and duplex.  Local APIs can allow
   Posture Collectors and Posture Validators to discover when they are
   operating in a less constrained deployment and then make use of more
   verbose attributes.  Similarly, Posture Collectors could choose not
   to send or use smaller attributes (including assertions from previous
   assessments) when faced with a very constrained network connection.










<span class="grey">Sahita, et al.               Standards Track                   [Page 73]</span></pre>
<hr class='noprint'/><!--NewPage--><pre class='newpage'><span id="page-74" ></span>
<span class="grey"><a href="./rfc5793">RFC 5793</a>                         PB-TNC                       March 2010</span>


<span class="h3"><a class="selflink" id="appendix-B.12" href="#appendix-B.12">B.12</a>.  Evaluation against Requirement PB-1</span>

   Requirement PB-1 says:

   PB-1  The PB protocol MUST be capable of carrying attributes from the
         Posture Broker Server to the Posture Broker Client.  This
         enables the Posture Broker Client to learn the posture
         assessment decision and if appropriate to aid in remediation
         and notification of the endpoint owner.

   PB-TNC meets this requirement.  It can carry attributes from the
   Posture Broker Client to the Posture Broker Server and back in an
   unlimited number of round trips.  Furthermore, PB-TNC provides
   explicit attribute support for posture decision and remediation aid
   notification.

<span class="h3"><a class="selflink" id="appendix-B.13" href="#appendix-B.13">B.13</a>.  Evaluation against Requirement PB-2</span>

   Requirement PB-2 says:

   PB-2  The PB protocol MUST NOT interpret the contents of PA messages
         being carried; i.e., the data it is carrying must be opaque to
         it.

   PB-TNC meets this requirement.  It does not parse or interpret PA
   messages in any way.

<span class="h3"><a class="selflink" id="appendix-B.14" href="#appendix-B.14">B.14</a>.  Evaluation against Requirement PB-3</span>

   Requirement PB-3 says:

   PB-3  The PB protocol MUST carry unique identifiers that are used by
         the Posture Brokers to route (deliver) PA messages between
         Posture Collectors and Posture Validators.  Such message
         routing should facilitate dynamic registration or
         deregistration of Posture Collectors and Validators.  For
         example, a dynamically registered anti-virus Posture Validator
         should be able to subscribe to receive messages from its
         respective anti-virus Posture Collector on NEA Clients.

   PB-TNC meets this requirement.  PB-TNC tags each PA message with a PA
   subtype that the Posture Brokers can use to deliver the PA messages
   to the proper Posture Collectors and Posture Validators.  By tagging
   messages according to their content, PB-TNC allows Posture Collectors
   and Posture Validators to be dynamically registered and deregistered,
   ensuring that each one receives the proper data.  PB-TNC also
   supports exclusive delivery, which allows messages to be targeted at
   a particular Posture Collector or Posture Validator.



<span class="grey">Sahita, et al.               Standards Track                   [Page 74]</span></pre>
<hr class='noprint'/><!--NewPage--><pre class='newpage'><span id="page-75" ></span>
<span class="grey"><a href="./rfc5793">RFC 5793</a>                         PB-TNC                       March 2010</span>


<span class="h3"><a class="selflink" id="appendix-B.15" href="#appendix-B.15">B.15</a>.  Evaluation against Requirement PB-4</span>

   Requirement PB-4 says:

   PB-4  The PB protocol MUST be capable of supporting a half-duplex PT
         protocol.  However, this does not preclude PB from operating
         full-duplex when running over a full-duplex PT.

   PB-TNC meets this requirement.  In order to insulate PA from any
   differences between half-duplex and full-duplex PT protocols, PB-TNC
   always operates in a half-duplex mode, regardless of the capabilities
   of the PT protocol.  While this could in theory slow assessments that
   require many round trips or bidirectional multimedia exchanges, this
   is not a problem in practice because endpoint assessments do not
   typically involve multimedia or a large number of round trips.

<span class="h3"><a class="selflink" id="appendix-B.16" href="#appendix-B.16">B.16</a>.  Evaluation against Requirement PB-5</span>

   Requirement PB-5 says:

   PB-5  The PB protocol MAY support authentication, integrity, and
         confidentiality protection for the attribute messages it
         carries between a Posture Broker Client and Posture Broker
         Server.  This provides security protection for a message dialog
         of the groupings of attribute messages exchanged between the
         Posture Broker Client and Posture Broker Server.  Such
         protection is orthogonal to PA protections (which are end to
         end) and allows for simpler Posture Collector and Validators to
         be implemented, and for consolidation of cryptographic
         operations possibly improving scalability and manageability.

   PB-TNC does not address this optional requirement.  It leaves
   security to PT (which is required to address it) and PA (which SHOULD
   do so).  There seems to be minimal benefit in adding a third layer of
   security to the NEA protocol stack.  However, if the NEA working
   group determines that PB should include support for authentication,
   integrity protection, and confidentiality protection, then this could
   be added to PB in a similar manner to the way that the PA-TNC
   security is done.












<span class="grey">Sahita, et al.               Standards Track                   [Page 75]</span></pre>
<hr class='noprint'/><!--NewPage--><pre class='newpage'><span id="page-76" ></span>
<span class="grey"><a href="./rfc5793">RFC 5793</a>                         PB-TNC                       March 2010</span>


<span class="h3"><a class="selflink" id="appendix-B.17" href="#appendix-B.17">B.17</a>.  Evaluation against Requirement PB-6</span>

   Requirement PB-6 says:

   PB-6  The PB protocol MUST support grouping of attribute messages to
         optimize transport of messages and minimize round trips.

   PB-TNC meets this requirement.  Multiple attribute messages can be
   conveyed in a single PA message.  In fact, that's how PA-TNC works.

Authors' Addresses

   Ravi Sahita
   Intel Corporation
   2200 Mission College Blvd.
   Santa Clara, CA 95054 USA
   EMail: Ravi.Sahita@intel.com

   Steve Hanna
   Juniper Networks, Inc.
   1194 North Mathilda Avenue
   Sunnyvale, CA 94089 USA
   EMail: shanna@juniper.net

   Ryan Hurst
   Microsoft Corporation
   One Microsoft Way
   Redmond, WA 98052 USA
   EMail: Ryan.Hurst@microsoft.com

   Kaushik Narayan
   Cisco Systems Inc.
   10 West Tasman Drive
   San Jose, CA 95134 USA
   EMail: kaushik@cisco.com
















Sahita, et al.               Standards Track                   [Page 76]
</pre>