1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
543
544
545
546
547
548
549
550
551
552
553
554
555
556
557
558
559
560
561
562
563
564
565
566
567
568
569
570
571
572
573
574
575
576
577
578
579
580
581
582
583
584
585
586
587
588
589
590
591
592
593
594
595
596
597
598
599
600
601
602
603
604
605
606
607
608
609
610
611
612
613
614
615
616
617
618
619
620
621
622
623
624
625
626
627
628
629
630
631
632
633
634
635
636
637
638
639
640
641
642
643
644
645
646
647
648
649
650
651
652
653
654
655
656
657
658
659
660
661
662
663
664
665
666
667
668
669
|
<pre>Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) D. Miles
Request for Comments: 6704 Google
Updates: <a href="./rfc3203">3203</a> W. Dec
Category: Standards Track Cisco Systems
ISSN: 2070-1721 J. Bristow
Swisscom Schweiz AG
R. Maglione
Telecom Italia
August 2012
<span class="h1">Forcerenew Nonce Authentication</span>
Abstract
Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol (DHCP) FORCERENEW allows for the
reconfiguration of a single host by forcing the DHCP client into a
Renew state on a trigger from the DHCP server. In the Forcerenew
Nonce Authentication protocol, the server sends a nonce to the client
in the initial DHCP ACK that is used for subsequent validation of a
FORCERENEW message. This document updates <a href="./rfc3203">RFC 3203</a>.
Status of This Memo
This is an Internet Standards Track document.
This document is a product of the Internet Engineering Task Force
(IETF). It represents the consensus of the IETF community. It has
received public review and has been approved for publication by the
Internet Engineering Steering Group (IESG). Further information on
Internet Standards is available in <a href="./rfc5741#section-2">Section 2 of RFC 5741</a>.
Information about the current status of this document, any errata,
and how to provide feedback on it may be obtained at
<a href="http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6704">http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6704</a>.
<span class="grey">Miles, et al. Standards Track [Page 1]</span></pre>
<hr class='noprint'/><!--NewPage--><pre class='newpage'><span id="page-2" ></span>
<span class="grey"><a href="./rfc6704">RFC 6704</a> Forcerenew Nonce August 2012</span>
Copyright Notice
Copyright (c) 2012 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
document authors. All rights reserved.
This document is subject to <a href="https://www.rfc-editor.org/bcp/bcp78">BCP 78</a> and the IETF Trust's Legal
Provisions Relating to IETF Documents
(<a href="http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info">http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info</a>) in effect on the date of
publication of this document. Please review these documents
carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect
to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must
include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of
the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as
described in the Simplified BSD License.
Table of Contents
<a href="#section-1">1</a>. Introduction ....................................................<a href="#page-2">2</a>
<a href="#section-2">2</a>. Requirements Language ...........................................<a href="#page-3">3</a>
<a href="#section-3">3</a>. Message Authentication ..........................................<a href="#page-3">3</a>
<a href="#section-3.1">3.1</a>. Forcerenew Nonce Authentication ............................<a href="#page-3">3</a>
<a href="#section-3.1.1">3.1.1</a>. Forcerenew Nonce Protocol Capability Option .........<a href="#page-4">4</a>
<a href="#section-3.1.2">3.1.2</a>. Forcerenew Nonce Authentication Protocol ............<a href="#page-6">6</a>
3.1.3. Server Considerations for Forcerenew Nonce
Authentication ......................................<a href="#page-8">8</a>
3.1.4. Client Considerations for Forcerenew Nonce
Authentication ......................................<a href="#page-9">9</a>
<a href="#section-4">4</a>. IANA Considerations ............................................<a href="#page-10">10</a>
<a href="#section-5">5</a>. Security Considerations ........................................<a href="#page-10">10</a>
<a href="#section-5.1">5.1</a>. Protocol Vulnerabilities ..................................<a href="#page-11">11</a>
<a href="#section-6">6</a>. Acknowledgements ...............................................<a href="#page-11">11</a>
<a href="#section-7">7</a>. Normative References ...........................................<a href="#page-11">11</a>
<span class="h2"><a class="selflink" id="section-1" href="#section-1">1</a>. Introduction</span>
The DHCP reconfigure extension defined in [<a href="./rfc3203" title=""DHCP reconfigure extension"">RFC3203</a>] is a useful
mechanism allowing dynamic reconfiguration of a single host triggered
by the DHCP server. Its application is currently limited by a
requirement that a Forcerenew message is always authenticated using
procedures as described in [<a href="./rfc3118" title=""Authentication for DHCP Messages"">RFC3118</a>]. Authentication for DHCP
[<a href="./rfc3118" title=""Authentication for DHCP Messages"">RFC3118</a>] is mandatory for FORCERENEW; however, as it is currently
defined, [<a href="./rfc3118" title=""Authentication for DHCP Messages"">RFC3118</a>] requires distribution of constant token or shared-
secret out-of-band to DHCP clients.
The motivation for making authentication mandatory in DHCP FORCERENEW
was to prevent an off-network attacker from taking advantage of DHCP
FORCERENEW to accurately predict the timing of a DHCP renewal.
Without DHCP FORCERENEW, DHCP renewal timing is under the control of
<span class="grey">Miles, et al. Standards Track [Page 2]</span></pre>
<hr class='noprint'/><!--NewPage--><pre class='newpage'><span id="page-3" ></span>
<span class="grey"><a href="./rfc6704">RFC 6704</a> Forcerenew Nonce August 2012</span>
the client, and an off-network attacker has no way of predicting when
it will happen, since it doesn't have access to the exchange between
the DHCP client and DHCP server.
However, the requirement to use the DHCP authentication described in
[<a href="./rfc3118" title=""Authentication for DHCP Messages"">RFC3118</a>] is more stringent than is required for this use case and
has limited adoption of DHCP FORCERENEW. [<a href="./rfc3315" title=""Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol for IPv6 (DHCPv6)"">RFC3315</a>] defines an
authentication protocol using a nonce to prevent off-network
attackers from successfully causing clients to renew. Since the off-
network attacker doesn't have access to the nonce, it can't trick the
client into renewing at a time of its choosing.
This document defines extensions to Authentication for DHCPv4
Messages [<a href="./rfc3118" title=""Authentication for DHCP Messages"">RFC3118</a>] to create a new authentication protocol for DHCPv4
FORCERENEW [<a href="./rfc3203" title=""DHCP reconfigure extension"">RFC3203</a>] messages; this method does not require out-of-
band key distribution to DHCP clients. The Forcerenew Nonce is
exchanged between server and client on initial DHCP ACK and is used
for verification of any subsequent FORCERENEW message. This document
updates [<a href="./rfc3203" title=""DHCP reconfigure extension"">RFC3203</a>].
<span class="h2"><a class="selflink" id="section-2" href="#section-2">2</a>. Requirements Language</span>
The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
"SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this
document are to be interpreted as described in [<a href="./rfc2119" title=""Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels"">RFC2119</a>].
<span class="h2"><a class="selflink" id="section-3" href="#section-3">3</a>. Message Authentication</span>
The Forcerenew message MUST be authenticated using either [<a href="./rfc3118" title=""Authentication for DHCP Messages"">RFC3118</a>]
or the proposed Forcerenew Nonce Authentication protocol.
<span class="h3"><a class="selflink" id="section-3.1" href="#section-3.1">3.1</a>. Forcerenew Nonce Authentication</span>
The Forcerenew Nonce Authentication protocol provides protection
against misconfiguration of a client caused by a Forcerenew message
sent by a malicious DHCP server. In this protocol, a DHCP server
sends a Forcerenew Nonce to the client in the initial exchange of
DHCP messages. The client records the Forcerenew Nonce for use in
authenticating subsequent Forcerenew messages from that server. The
server then includes a Hashed Message Authentication Code (HMAC)
computed from the Forcerenew nonce in subsequent Forcerenew messages.
Both the Forcerenew Nonce sent from the server to the client and the
HMAC in subsequent Forcerenew messages are carried as the
Authentication information in a DHCP Authentication option. The
format of the Authentication information is defined in the following
section.
<span class="grey">Miles, et al. Standards Track [Page 3]</span></pre>
<hr class='noprint'/><!--NewPage--><pre class='newpage'><span id="page-4" ></span>
<span class="grey"><a href="./rfc6704">RFC 6704</a> Forcerenew Nonce August 2012</span>
The Forcerenew Nonce Authentication protocol is used (initiated by
the server) only if the client and server are not using the
authentication mechanism specified in [<a href="./rfc3118" title=""Authentication for DHCP Messages"">RFC3118</a>] and the client and
server have negotiated to use the Forcerenew Nonce Authentication
protocol.
<span class="h4"><a class="selflink" id="section-3.1.1" href="#section-3.1.1">3.1.1</a>. Forcerenew Nonce Protocol Capability Option</span>
A DHCP client indicates DHCP Forcerenew Nonce Protocol capability by
including a FORCERENEW_NONCE_CAPABLE (145) option in DHCP Discover
and Request messages sent to the server.
A DHCP server that does not support Forcerenew Nonce Authentication
protocol authentication SHOULD ignore the FORCERENEW_NONCE_CAPABLE
(145) option. A DHCP server indicates DHCP Forcerenew Nonce Protocol
preference by including a FORCERENEW_NONCE_CAPABLE (145) option in
any DHCP Offer messages sent to the client.
A DHCP client MUST NOT send DHCP messages with authentication options
where the protocol value is Forcerenew Nonce Authentication.
The FORCERENEW_NONCE_CAPABLE option contains code 145, length n, and
a sequence of algorithms the client supports:
Code Len Algorithms
+-----+-----+----+----+----+
| 145 | n | A1 | A2 | A3 | ....
+-----+-----+----+----+----+
Figure 1: FORCERENEW_NONCE_CAPABLE Option
In this document, <a href="#section-3.1.2">Section 3.1.2</a> defines the Forcerenew Nonce
Authentication protocol for algorithm equal to 1 and type equal to 2;
future documents will specify the other values for algorithm !=1 and
type !=2, allowing a different algorithm to be used with shorter/
longer values.
The client would indicate that it supports the functionality by
inserting the FORCERENEW_NONCE_CAPABLE option in the DHCP Discover
and Request messages. If the server supports Forcerenew nonce
authentication and requires Forcerenew nonce authentication, it will
insert the FORCERENEW_NONCE_CAPABLE option in the DHCPOFFER.
<span class="grey">Miles, et al. Standards Track [Page 4]</span></pre>
<hr class='noprint'/><!--NewPage--><pre class='newpage'><span id="page-5" ></span>
<span class="grey"><a href="./rfc6704">RFC 6704</a> Forcerenew Nonce August 2012</span>
Server Client Server
(not selected) (selected)
v v v
| | |
| Begins initialization |
| | |
| _____________/|\____________ |
|/DHCPDISCOVER | DHCPDISCOVER \|
| w/FORCERENEW- | w/FORCERENEW- |
| NONCE-CAPABLE | NONCE-CAPABLE |
| | |
Determines | Determines
configuration | configuration
| | |
|\ | /|
| \__________ | _________/ |
| DHCPOFFER \ | /DHCPOFFER |
|w/FORCERENEW \ | /w/FORCERENEW|
|NONCE-CAPABLE \| /NONCE-CAPABLE|
| | |
| Collects replies |
| | |
| Selects configuration |
| | |
| _____________/|\____________ |
|/ DHCPREQUEST | DHCPREQUEST\ |
| w/Forcerenew- | w/Forcerenew- |
| Nonce-Capable | Nonce-Capable |
| | |
| | Commits configuration
| | |
| |Creates 128-bit Forcerenew Nonce
| | |
| | _____________/|
| |/ DHCPACK |
| | w/Auth-Proto= |
| | Forcerenew- |
| | Nonce |
| | |
|Client stores Forcerenew Nonce |
| | |
| Initialization complete |
| | |
. . .
. . .
| | |
| Forcerenew |
<span class="grey">Miles, et al. Standards Track [Page 5]</span></pre>
<hr class='noprint'/><!--NewPage--><pre class='newpage'><span id="page-6" ></span>
<span class="grey"><a href="./rfc6704">RFC 6704</a> Forcerenew Nonce August 2012</span>
| | _____________/|
| |/ DHCPFORCE |
| | w/Auth-Proto= |
| | Forcerenew- |
| | Digest(HMAC)|
| | |
| Client checks HMAC digest |
| using stored Forcerenew Nonce |
| | |
| |\____________ |
| | DHCPREQUEST\ |
| | w/FORCERENEW- |
| | NONCE-CAPABLE |
| | |
| | Commits configuration
| | |
| |Creates 128-bit Forcerenew Nonce
| | |
| | _____________/|
| |/ DHCPACK |
| | w/Auth-Proto= |
| | Forcerenew- |
| | Nonce |
| | |
| | |
| | |
. . .
. . .
| | |
| Graceful shutdown |
| | |
| |\ ____________ |
| | DHCPRELEASE \|
| | |
| | Discards lease
| | |
v v v
Figure 2: Timeline Diagram of Messages Exchanged between DHCP Client
and Servers Using the Forcerenew Nonce Authentication Protocol
<span class="h4"><a class="selflink" id="section-3.1.2" href="#section-3.1.2">3.1.2</a>. Forcerenew Nonce Authentication Protocol</span>
The Forcerenew Nonce Authentication protocol makes use of both the
DHCP authentication option defined in [<a href="./rfc3118" title=""Authentication for DHCP Messages"">RFC3118</a>] reusing the option
format and of the Reconfigure Key Authentication Protocol defined in
[<a href="./rfc3315" title=""Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol for IPv6 (DHCPv6)"">RFC3315</a>].
<span class="grey">Miles, et al. Standards Track [Page 6]</span></pre>
<hr class='noprint'/><!--NewPage--><pre class='newpage'><span id="page-7" ></span>
<span class="grey"><a href="./rfc6704">RFC 6704</a> Forcerenew Nonce August 2012</span>
The following diagram defines the format of the DHCP authentication
option:
0 1 2 3
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Code | Length | Protocol | Algorithm |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| RDM | Replay Detection (64 bits) |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Replay cont. |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Replay cont. | |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ |
| |
| Authentication Information |
| |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
Figure 3: Format of the DHCP Authentication Option
The following fields are set in an DHCP authentication option for the
Forcerenew Nonce Authentication protocol.
Code: 90 (Authentication) per [<a href="./rfc3118" title=""Authentication for DHCP Messages"">RFC3118</a>]
Length: contains the length of the protocol
Protocol: 3 (Reconfigure Key) per [<a href="./rfc3118" title=""Authentication for DHCP Messages"">RFC3118</a>]
Algorithm: 1 (HMAC-MD5) per [<a href="./rfc3118" title=""Authentication for DHCP Messages"">RFC3118</a>] and [<a href="./rfc3315" title=""Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol for IPv6 (DHCPv6)"">RFC3315</a>]
Replay Detection: per the Replay Detection Method (RDM)
Replay Detection Method (RDM): 0
Authentication Information: specified below
<span class="grey">Miles, et al. Standards Track [Page 7]</span></pre>
<hr class='noprint'/><!--NewPage--><pre class='newpage'><span id="page-8" ></span>
<span class="grey"><a href="./rfc6704">RFC 6704</a> Forcerenew Nonce August 2012</span>
The format of the Authentication Information for the Forcerenew Nonce
Authentication Protocol is as follows:
0 1 2 3
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Type | Value (128 bits) |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ |
. .
. .
. +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
Figure 4: Format of the Authentication Information
Type: The type of data in Value field carried in this option:
1 Forcerenew nonce Value (used in ACK message)
2 HMAC-MD5 digest of the message (Forcerenew message)
Value: The message authentication code generated by applying MD5
to the DHCP message
<span class="h4"><a class="selflink" id="section-3.1.3" href="#section-3.1.3">3.1.3</a>. Server Considerations for Forcerenew Nonce Authentication</span>
The use of Forcerenew Nonce Authentication protocol is dependent on
the client indicating its capability through the
FORCERENEW_NONCE_CAPABLE (145) DHCP option in any DHCP Discover or
Request messages. The DHCP Discovery or Request message from the
client MUST contain the FORCERENEW_NONCE_CAPABLE (145) option if the
Forcerenew Nonce Protocol is to be used by the server. The absence
of the FORCERENEW_NONCE_CAPABLE (145) option indicates to the server
that the Forcerenew Nonce Authentication protocol is not supported;
thus, the server MUST NOT include a Forcerenew Nonce Protocol
Authentication option in the DHCP ACK.
The server indicates its support of the Forcerenew Nonce
Authentication protocol by including the DHCP
FORCERENEW_NONCE_CAPABLE (145) option in the DHCPOFFER. The server
SHOULD NOT include this option unless the client has indicated its
capability in a DHCP Discovery message. The presence of the
FORCERENEW_NONCE_CAPABLE (145) option in the DHCP offer may be used
by clients to prefer DHCP servers that are Forcerenew Nonce
Authentication protocol capable over those servers that do not
support such capability.
<span class="grey">Miles, et al. Standards Track [Page 8]</span></pre>
<hr class='noprint'/><!--NewPage--><pre class='newpage'><span id="page-9" ></span>
<span class="grey"><a href="./rfc6704">RFC 6704</a> Forcerenew Nonce August 2012</span>
If a capable server receives a DISCOVER or REQUEST (any type) that
indicates the client is capable, and the server has no previous nonce
recorded, it MUST generate a nonce and include it in the ACK.
The server selects a Forcerenew Nonce for a client only during
Request/ACK message exchange. The server records the Forcerenew
nonce and transmits that nonce to the client in an Authentication
option in the DHCP ACK message.
The server SHOULD NOT include the nonce in an ACK when responding to
a renew unless a new nonce was generated. This minimizes the number
of times the nonce is sent over the wire.
If the server to which the DHCP Request message was sent at time T1
has not responded, the client enters the REBINDING state and attempts
to contact any server. The new Server receiving the DHCP message
MUST generate a new nonce.
The Forcerenew nonce is 128 bits long, and it MUST be a
cryptographically strong random or pseudo-random number that cannot
easily be predicted. The nonce is embedded as a 128-bit value of the
Authentication information where type is set to 1 (Forcerenew nonce
Value).
To provide authentication for a Forcerenew message, the server
selects a replay detection value according to the RDM selected by the
server and computes an HMAC-MD5 of the Forcerenew message, based on
the procedure specified in <a href="./rfc3315#section-21.5">Section 21.5 of [RFC3315]</a>, using the
Forcerenew Nonce for the client. The server computes the HMAC-MD5
over the entire DHCP Forcerenew message, including the Authentication
option; the HMAC-MD5 field in the Authentication option is set to
zero for the HMAC-MD5 computation
<span class="h4"><a class="selflink" id="section-3.1.4" href="#section-3.1.4">3.1.4</a>. Client Considerations for Forcerenew Nonce Authentication</span>
A client that supports this mechanism MUST indicate Forcerenew nonce
Capability by including the FORCERENEW_NONCE_CAPABLE (145) DHCP
option defined in <a href="#section-3.1.1">Section 3.1.1</a> in all DHCP Discover and Request
messages. DHCP servers that support Forcerenew nonce Protocol
authentication MUST include the FORCERENEW_NONCE_CAPABLE (145) DHCP
option in all DHCP Offers, allowing the client to use this capability
in selecting DHCP servers should multiple Offers arrive.
The client MUST validate the DHCP ACK message contains a Forcerenew
Nonce in a DHCP authentication option. If the server has indicated
capability for Forcerenew Nonce Authentication protocol in the DHCP
OFFER and the subsequent ACK received by the client while in the
selecting state omits a valid DHCP authentication option for the
<span class="grey">Miles, et al. Standards Track [Page 9]</span></pre>
<hr class='noprint'/><!--NewPage--><pre class='newpage'><span id="page-10" ></span>
<span class="grey"><a href="./rfc6704">RFC 6704</a> Forcerenew Nonce August 2012</span>
Forcerenew Nonce Authentication protocol, the client MUST discard the
message and return to the INIT state.
The client MUST record the Forcerenew Nonce from any valid ACK it
receives, if the ACK contains one.
To authenticate a Forcerenew message, the client computes an HMAC-
MD5, based on the procedure specified in <a href="./rfc3315#section-21.5">Section 21.5 of [RFC3315]</a>,
over the DHCP Forcerenew message (after setting the HMAC-MD5 field in
the Authentication option to zero), using the Forcerenew Nonce
received from the server. If this computed HMAC-MD5 matches the
value in the Authentication option, the client accepts the FORCERENEW
message.
<span class="h2"><a class="selflink" id="section-4" href="#section-4">4</a>. IANA Considerations</span>
IANA has assigned the following new DHCPv4 option code from the
registry "BOOTP Vendor Extensions and DHCP Options" maintained at
<a href="http://www.iana">http://www.iana</a>.org/assignments/bootp-dhcp-parameters:
Tag: 145
Name: FORCERENEW_NONCE_CAPABLE
Data length: 1
Description: Forcerenew Nonce Capable
Reference: this document
<span class="h2"><a class="selflink" id="section-5" href="#section-5">5</a>. Security Considerations</span>
As in some network environments FORCERENEW can be used to snoop and
spoof traffic, the FORCERENEW message MUST be authenticated using the
procedures as described in [<a href="./rfc3118" title=""Authentication for DHCP Messages"">RFC3118</a>] or the mechanism described in
this document.
The mechanism in [<a href="./rfc3315" title=""Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol for IPv6 (DHCPv6)"">RFC3315</a>] for DHCPv6, which this document mirrors
for DHCPv4, uses a nonce to prevent an off-link attacker from
successfully triggering a renewal on a client by sending
DHCPFORCERENEW; since the attacker is off-link, it doesn't have the
nonce, and can't force a renewal.
An on-link attacker can always simply watch the DHCP renewal message
go out and respond to it, so this mechanism is useless for preventing
on-link attacks; hence, the security of the nonce in the case of on-
link attacks isn't relevant. Therefore, HMAC-MD5 is, by definition,
adequate for the purpose, and there is no need for an extensible HMAC
<span class="grey">Miles, et al. Standards Track [Page 10]</span></pre>
<hr class='noprint'/><!--NewPage--><pre class='newpage'><span id="page-11" ></span>
<span class="grey"><a href="./rfc6704">RFC 6704</a> Forcerenew Nonce August 2012</span>
mechanism. FORCERENEW messages failing the authentication should be
silently discarded by the client.
<span class="h3"><a class="selflink" id="section-5.1" href="#section-5.1">5.1</a>. Protocol Vulnerabilities</span>
The mechanism described in this document is vulnerable to a denial-
of-service (DoS) attack through flooding a client with bogus
FORCERENEW messages. The calculations involved in authenticating the
bogus FORECERENEW messages may overwhelm the device on which the
client is running.
The mechanism described provides protection against the use of a
FORCERENEW message by a malicious DHCP server to mount a DoS or man-
in-the-middle attack on a client. This protocol can be compromised
by an attacker that can intercept the initial message in which the
DHCP server sends the nonce to the client.
<span class="h2"><a class="selflink" id="section-6" href="#section-6">6</a>. Acknowledgements</span>
This contribution is based on work by Vitali Vinokour. Major
sections of this document use modified text from [<a href="./rfc3315" title=""Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol for IPv6 (DHCPv6)"">RFC3315</a>]. The
authors wish to thank Ted Lemon, Matthew Ryan, and Bernie Volz for
their support.
<span class="h2"><a class="selflink" id="section-7" href="#section-7">7</a>. Normative References</span>
[<a id="ref-RFC2119">RFC2119</a>] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate
Requirement Levels", <a href="https://www.rfc-editor.org/bcp/bcp14">BCP 14</a>, <a href="./rfc2119">RFC 2119</a>, March 1997.
[<a id="ref-RFC3118">RFC3118</a>] Droms, R. and W. Arbaugh, "Authentication for DHCP
Messages", <a href="./rfc3118">RFC 3118</a>, June 2001.
[<a id="ref-RFC3203">RFC3203</a>] T'Joens, Y., Hublet, C., and P. De Schrijver, "DHCP
reconfigure extension", <a href="./rfc3203">RFC 3203</a>, December 2001.
[<a id="ref-RFC3315">RFC3315</a>] Droms, R., Bound, J., Volz, B., Lemon, T., Perkins, C.,
and M. Carney, "Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol for
IPv6 (DHCPv6)", <a href="./rfc3315">RFC 3315</a>, July 2003.
<span class="grey">Miles, et al. Standards Track [Page 11]</span></pre>
<hr class='noprint'/><!--NewPage--><pre class='newpage'><span id="page-12" ></span>
<span class="grey"><a href="./rfc6704">RFC 6704</a> Forcerenew Nonce August 2012</span>
Authors' Addresses
David Miles
Google
EMail: davidmiles@google.com
Wojciech Dec
Cisco Systems
Haarlerbergpark Haarlerbergweg 13-19
Amsterdam, NOORD-HOLLAND 1101 CH
Netherlands
EMail: wdec@cisco.com
James Bristow
Swisscom Schweiz AG
Zentweg 9
Bern, 3050,
Switzerland
EMail: James.Bristow@swisscom.com
Roberta Maglione
Telecom Italia
Via Reiss Romoli 274
Torino 10148
Italy
EMail: roberta.maglione@telecomitalia.it
Miles, et al. Standards Track [Page 12]
</pre>
|
