1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
|
<pre>Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) F. Gont
Request for Comments: 6918 UTN-FRH / SI6 Networks
Obsoletes: <a href="./rfc1788">1788</a> C. Pignataro
Updates: <a href="./rfc792">792</a>, <a href="./rfc950">950</a> Cisco Systems
Category: Standards Track April 2013
ISSN: 2070-1721
<span class="h1">Formally Deprecating Some ICMPv4 Message Types</span>
Abstract
A number of ICMPv4 message types have become obsolete in practice,
but have never been formally deprecated. This document deprecates
such ICMPv4 message types, thus cleaning up the corresponding IANA
registry. Additionally, it updates <a href="./rfc792">RFC 792</a> and <a href="./rfc950">RFC 950</a>, obsoletes
<a href="./rfc1788">RFC 1788</a>, and requests the RFC Editor to change the status of <a href="./rfc1788">RFC</a>
<a href="./rfc1788">1788</a> to Historic.
Status of This Memo
This is an Internet Standards Track document.
This document is a product of the Internet Engineering Task Force
(IETF). It represents the consensus of the IETF community. It has
received public review and has been approved for publication by the
Internet Engineering Steering Group (IESG). Further information on
Internet Standards is available in <a href="./rfc5741#section-2">Section 2 of RFC 5741</a>.
Information about the current status of this document, any errata,
and how to provide feedback on it may be obtained at
<a href="http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6918">http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6918</a>.
Copyright Notice
Copyright (c) 2013 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
document authors. All rights reserved.
This document is subject to <a href="https://www.rfc-editor.org/bcp/bcp78">BCP 78</a> and the IETF Trust's Legal
Provisions Relating to IETF Documents
(<a href="http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info">http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info</a>) in effect on the date of
publication of this document. Please review these documents
carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect
to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must
include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of
the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as
described in the Simplified BSD License.
<span class="grey">Gont & Pignataro Standards Track [Page 1]</span></pre>
<hr class='noprint'/><!--NewPage--><pre class='newpage'><span id="page-2" ></span>
<span class="grey"><a href="./rfc6918">RFC 6918</a> Deprecating Some ICMPv4 Messages April 2013</span>
Table of Contents
<a href="#section-1">1</a>. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . <a href="#page-2">2</a>
<a href="#section-2">2</a>. Discussion of Deprecated ICMPv4 Message Types . . . . . . . . . <a href="#page-3">3</a>
<a href="#section-2.1">2.1</a>. Alternate Host Address (Type 6) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . <a href="#page-3">3</a>
<a href="#section-2.2">2.2</a>. Information Request (Type 15) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . <a href="#page-3">3</a>
<a href="#section-2.3">2.3</a>. Information Reply (Type 16) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . <a href="#page-3">3</a>
<a href="#section-2.4">2.4</a>. Address Mask Request (Type 17) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . <a href="#page-3">3</a>
<a href="#section-2.5">2.5</a>. Address Mask Reply (Type 18) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . <a href="#page-3">3</a>
<a href="#section-2.6">2.6</a>. Traceroute (Type 30) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . <a href="#page-3">3</a>
<a href="#section-2.7">2.7</a>. Datagram Conversion Error (Type 31) . . . . . . . . . . . . <a href="#page-4">4</a>
<a href="#section-2.8">2.8</a>. Mobile Host Redirect (Type 32) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . <a href="#page-4">4</a>
<a href="#section-2.9">2.9</a>. IPv6 Where-Are-You (Type 33) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . <a href="#page-4">4</a>
<a href="#section-2.10">2.10</a>. IPv6 I-Am-Here (Type 34) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . <a href="#page-4">4</a>
<a href="#section-2.11">2.11</a>. Mobile Registration Request (Type 35) . . . . . . . . . . . <a href="#page-4">4</a>
<a href="#section-2.12">2.12</a>. Mobile Registration Reply (Type 36) . . . . . . . . . . . . <a href="#page-4">4</a>
<a href="#section-2.13">2.13</a>. Domain Name Request (Type 37) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . <a href="#page-4">4</a>
<a href="#section-2.14">2.14</a>. Domain Name Reply (Type 38) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . <a href="#page-5">5</a>
<a href="#section-2.15">2.15</a>. SKIP (Type 39) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . <a href="#page-5">5</a>
<a href="#section-3">3</a>. IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . <a href="#page-5">5</a>
<a href="#section-4">4</a>. Changing the Status of <a href="./rfc1788">RFC 1788</a> to Historic . . . . . . . . . . <a href="#page-6">6</a>
<a href="#section-5">5</a>. Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . <a href="#page-6">6</a>
<a href="#section-6">6</a>. Acknowledgments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . <a href="#page-6">6</a>
<a href="#section-7">7</a>. References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . <a href="#page-6">6</a>
<a href="#section-7.1">7.1</a>. Normative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . <a href="#page-6">6</a>
<a href="#section-7.2">7.2</a>. Informative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . <a href="#page-6">6</a>
<span class="h2"><a class="selflink" id="section-1" href="#section-1">1</a>. Introduction</span>
A number of ICMPv4 [<a href="./rfc0792" title=""Internet Control Message Protocol"">RFC0792</a>] message types have been specified over
the years. A number of these message types have become obsolete in
practice, but have never been formally deprecated. This document
deprecates such ICMPv4 message types, "cleaning up" the corresponding
IANA registry. Additionally, it updates <a href="./rfc792">RFC 792</a> and <a href="./rfc950">RFC 950</a>,
obsoletes <a href="./rfc1788">RFC 1788</a>, and requests the RFC Editor to change the status
of <a href="./rfc1788">RFC 1788</a> to Historic.
<a href="#section-2">Section 2</a> discusses each of the obsoleted ICMPv4 messages. <a href="#section-4">Section 4</a>
requests the RFC Editor to change the status of <a href="./rfc1788">RFC 1788</a> to Historic.
<span class="grey">Gont & Pignataro Standards Track [Page 2]</span></pre>
<hr class='noprint'/><!--NewPage--><pre class='newpage'><span id="page-3" ></span>
<span class="grey"><a href="./rfc6918">RFC 6918</a> Deprecating Some ICMPv4 Messages April 2013</span>
<span class="h2"><a class="selflink" id="section-2" href="#section-2">2</a>. Discussion of Deprecated ICMPv4 Message Types</span>
The following subsections discuss the details of those ICMPv4 message
types being deprecated, based on publicly available information
and/or information provided by the requester of the corresponding
assignment.
<span class="h3"><a class="selflink" id="section-2.1" href="#section-2.1">2.1</a>. Alternate Host Address (Type 6)</span>
There is no publicly available information about this message type.
<span class="h3"><a class="selflink" id="section-2.2" href="#section-2.2">2.2</a>. Information Request (Type 15)</span>
This message type is specified in [<a href="./rfc0792" title=""Internet Control Message Protocol"">RFC0792</a>]. However, other
mechanisms (such as DHCP [<a href="./rfc2131" title=""Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol"">RFC2131</a>]) have superseded this message type
for the purpose of host configuration.
<span class="h3"><a class="selflink" id="section-2.3" href="#section-2.3">2.3</a>. Information Reply (Type 16)</span>
This message type is specified in [<a href="./rfc0792" title=""Internet Control Message Protocol"">RFC0792</a>]. However, other
mechanisms (such as DHCP [<a href="./rfc2131" title=""Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol"">RFC2131</a>]) have superseded this message type
for the purpose of host configuration.
<span class="h3"><a class="selflink" id="section-2.4" href="#section-2.4">2.4</a>. Address Mask Request (Type 17)</span>
This message type is specified in [<a href="./rfc0950" title=""Internet Standard Subnetting Procedure"">RFC0950</a>] and was meant to provide
a means to obtain the subnet mask. However, other mechanisms (such
as DHCP [<a href="./rfc2131" title=""Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol"">RFC2131</a>]) have superseded this message type for the purpose
of host configuration.
<span class="h3"><a class="selflink" id="section-2.5" href="#section-2.5">2.5</a>. Address Mask Reply (Type 18)</span>
This message type is specified in [<a href="./rfc0950" title=""Internet Standard Subnetting Procedure"">RFC0950</a>] and was meant to provide
a means to obtain the subnet mask. However, other mechanisms (such
as DHCP [<a href="./rfc2131" title=""Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol"">RFC2131</a>]) have superseded this message type for the purpose
of host configuration.
<span class="h3"><a class="selflink" id="section-2.6" href="#section-2.6">2.6</a>. Traceroute (Type 30)</span>
This message type is specified in [<a href="./rfc1393" title=""Traceroute Using an IP Option"">RFC1393</a>] and was meant to provide
an alternative means to discover the path to a destination system.
This message type has never been widely deployed. The status of
[<a href="./rfc1393" title=""Traceroute Using an IP Option"">RFC1393</a>] has been changed to Historic by [<a href="./rfc6814" title=""Formally Deprecating Some IPv4 Options"">RFC6814</a>], and the
corresponding option this message type relies on (Traceroute, Type
82) has been formally obsoleted by [<a href="./rfc6814" title=""Formally Deprecating Some IPv4 Options"">RFC6814</a>].
<span class="grey">Gont & Pignataro Standards Track [Page 3]</span></pre>
<hr class='noprint'/><!--NewPage--><pre class='newpage'><span id="page-4" ></span>
<span class="grey"><a href="./rfc6918">RFC 6918</a> Deprecating Some ICMPv4 Messages April 2013</span>
<span class="h3"><a class="selflink" id="section-2.7" href="#section-2.7">2.7</a>. Datagram Conversion Error (Type 31)</span>
This message type was originally meant to report conversion errors in
the TP/IX [<a href="./rfc1475" title=""TP/IX: The Next Internet"">RFC1475</a>] protocol. However, TP/IX was never widely
implemented or deployed, and the status of [<a href="./rfc1475" title=""TP/IX: The Next Internet"">RFC1475</a>] is Historic.
<span class="h3"><a class="selflink" id="section-2.8" href="#section-2.8">2.8</a>. Mobile Host Redirect (Type 32)</span>
This message type was originally specified as part of an experimental
protocol for IP Mobile Hosts [<a href="#ref-CMU-MOBILE" title=""Transparent Internet Routing for IP Mobile Hosts"">CMU-MOBILE</a>]. However, it was never
widely implemented or deployed.
<span class="h3"><a class="selflink" id="section-2.9" href="#section-2.9">2.9</a>. IPv6 Where-Are-You (Type 33)</span>
This message type was originally specified in [<a href="#ref-SIMPSON-DISCOV">SIMPSON-DISCOV</a>] for
the purpose of identification of adjacent IPv6 nodes. It was never
widely deployed or implemented.
<span class="h3"><a class="selflink" id="section-2.10" href="#section-2.10">2.10</a>. IPv6 I-Am-Here (Type 34)</span>
This message type was originally specified in [<a href="#ref-SIMPSON-DISCOV">SIMPSON-DISCOV</a>] for
the purpose of identification of adjacent IPv6 nodes. It was never
widely deployed or implemented.
<span class="h3"><a class="selflink" id="section-2.11" href="#section-2.11">2.11</a>. Mobile Registration Request (Type 35)</span>
This message type was originally meant for transparent routing of
IPv6 datagrams to Mobile Nodes [<a href="#ref-SIMPSON-MOBILITY">SIMPSON-MOBILITY</a>]. It was never
widely deployed or implemented.
<span class="h3"><a class="selflink" id="section-2.12" href="#section-2.12">2.12</a>. Mobile Registration Reply (Type 36)</span>
This message type was originally meant for transparent routing of
IPv6 datagrams to Mobile Nodes [<a href="#ref-SIMPSON-MOBILITY">SIMPSON-MOBILITY</a>]. It was never
widely deployed or implemented.
<span class="h3"><a class="selflink" id="section-2.13" href="#section-2.13">2.13</a>. Domain Name Request (Type 37)</span>
This message type was originally specified in [<a href="./rfc1788" title=""ICMP Domain Name Messages"">RFC1788</a>] for the
purpose of learning the Fully Qualified Domain Name associated with
an IP address. This message type was never widely deployed or
implemented.
<span class="grey">Gont & Pignataro Standards Track [Page 4]</span></pre>
<hr class='noprint'/><!--NewPage--><pre class='newpage'><span id="page-5" ></span>
<span class="grey"><a href="./rfc6918">RFC 6918</a> Deprecating Some ICMPv4 Messages April 2013</span>
<span class="h3"><a class="selflink" id="section-2.14" href="#section-2.14">2.14</a>. Domain Name Reply (Type 38)</span>
This message type was originally specified in [<a href="./rfc1788" title=""ICMP Domain Name Messages"">RFC1788</a>] for the
purpose of learning the Fully Qualified Domain Name associated with
an IP address. This message type was never widely deployed or
implemented.
<span class="h3"><a class="selflink" id="section-2.15" href="#section-2.15">2.15</a>. SKIP (Type 39)</span>
This message type was originally specified in [<a href="#ref-SKIP-ADP" title=""SKIP Algorithm Discovery Protocol"">SKIP-ADP</a>] for
informing supported capabilities in the SKIP [<a href="#ref-SKIP" title=""Simple Key-Management For Internet Protocols (SKIP)"">SKIP</a>] protocol. This
message type was never widely deployed or implemented.
<span class="h2"><a class="selflink" id="section-3" href="#section-3">3</a>. IANA Considerations</span>
The "Internet Control Message Protocol (ICMP) Parameters" registry
[<a href="#ref-IANA-ICMP" title=""Internet Control Message Protocol (ICMP) Parameters"">IANA-ICMP</a>] contains the list of the currently assigned ICMP message
Types.
This document formally deprecates the following ICMP message Types
and requests IANA to mark them as such in the corresponding registry
[<a href="#ref-IANA-ICMP" title=""Internet Control Message Protocol (ICMP) Parameters"">IANA-ICMP</a>]:
o Alternate Host Address (Type 6)
o Information Request (Type 15)
o Information Reply (Type 16)
o Address Mask Request (Type 17)
o Address Mask Reply (Type 18)
o Traceroute (Type 30)
o Datagram Conversion Error (Type 31)
o Mobile Host Redirect (Type 32)
o IPv6 Where-Are-You (Type 33)
o IPv6 I-Am-Here (Type 34)
o Mobile Registration Request (Type 35)
o Mobile Registration Reply (Type 36)
o Domain Name Request (Type 37)
<span class="grey">Gont & Pignataro Standards Track [Page 5]</span></pre>
<hr class='noprint'/><!--NewPage--><pre class='newpage'><span id="page-6" ></span>
<span class="grey"><a href="./rfc6918">RFC 6918</a> Deprecating Some ICMPv4 Messages April 2013</span>
o Domain Name Reply (Type 38)
o SKIP (Type 39)
The ICMPv4 Source Quench Message (Type 4) has already been
deprecated by [<a href="./rfc6633" title=""Deprecation of ICMP Source Quench Messages"">RFC6633</a>].
<span class="h2"><a class="selflink" id="section-4" href="#section-4">4</a>. Changing the Status of <a href="./rfc1788">RFC 1788</a> to Historic</span>
This document requests the RFC Editor to change the status of
[<a href="./rfc1788" title=""ICMP Domain Name Messages"">RFC1788</a>] to Historic.
Both [<a href="./rfc1385" title=""EIP: The Extended Internet Protocol"">RFC1385</a>] and [<a href="./rfc1393" title=""Traceroute Using an IP Option"">RFC1393</a>] already have a status of Historic.
The status of other RFCs (such as [<a href="./rfc0792" title=""Internet Control Message Protocol"">RFC0792</a>] and [<a href="./rfc0950" title=""Internet Standard Subnetting Procedure"">RFC0950</a>]) is not
changed since other parts of these documents are still current.
<span class="h2"><a class="selflink" id="section-5" href="#section-5">5</a>. Security Considerations</span>
This document does not modify the security properties of the ICMPv4
message types being deprecated. However, formally deprecating these
message types serves as a basis for, e.g., filtering these packets.
<span class="h2"><a class="selflink" id="section-6" href="#section-6">6</a>. Acknowledgments</span>
The authors would like to thank Ron Bonica and Joel Halpern for their
guidance.
<span class="h2"><a class="selflink" id="section-7" href="#section-7">7</a>. References</span>
<span class="h3"><a class="selflink" id="section-7.1" href="#section-7.1">7.1</a>. Normative References</span>
[<a id="ref-RFC0792">RFC0792</a>] Postel, J., "Internet Control Message Protocol", STD 5,
<a href="./rfc792">RFC 792</a>, September 1981.
[<a id="ref-RFC6814">RFC6814</a>] Pignataro, C. and F. Gont, "Formally Deprecating Some
IPv4 Options", <a href="./rfc6814">RFC 6814</a>, November 2012.
<span class="h3"><a class="selflink" id="section-7.2" href="#section-7.2">7.2</a>. Informative References</span>
[<a id="ref-CMU-MOBILE">CMU-MOBILE</a>] Johnson, D., "Transparent Internet Routing for IP Mobile
Hosts", Work in Progress, July 1993.
[<a id="ref-IANA-ICMP">IANA-ICMP</a>] Internet Assigned Numbers Authority, "Internet Control
Message Protocol (ICMP) Parameters", September 2012,
<<a href="http://www.iana.org/assignments/icmp-parameters">http://www.iana.org/assignments/icmp-parameters</a>>.
[<a id="ref-RFC0950">RFC0950</a>] Mogul, J. and J. Postel, "Internet Standard Subnetting
Procedure", STD 5, <a href="./rfc950">RFC 950</a>, August 1985.
<span class="grey">Gont & Pignataro Standards Track [Page 6]</span></pre>
<hr class='noprint'/><!--NewPage--><pre class='newpage'><span id="page-7" ></span>
<span class="grey"><a href="./rfc6918">RFC 6918</a> Deprecating Some ICMPv4 Messages April 2013</span>
[<a id="ref-RFC1385">RFC1385</a>] Wang, Z., "EIP: The Extended Internet Protocol",
<a href="./rfc1385">RFC 1385</a>, November 1992.
[<a id="ref-RFC1393">RFC1393</a>] Malkin, G., "Traceroute Using an IP Option", <a href="./rfc1393">RFC 1393</a>,
January 1993.
[<a id="ref-RFC1475">RFC1475</a>] Ullmann, R., "TP/IX: The Next Internet", <a href="./rfc1475">RFC 1475</a>,
June 1993.
[<a id="ref-RFC1788">RFC1788</a>] Simpson, W., "ICMP Domain Name Messages", <a href="./rfc1788">RFC 1788</a>,
April 1995.
[<a id="ref-RFC2131">RFC2131</a>] Droms, R., "Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol",
<a href="./rfc2131">RFC 2131</a>, March 1997.
[<a id="ref-RFC6633">RFC6633</a>] Gont, F., "Deprecation of ICMP Source Quench Messages",
<a href="./rfc6633">RFC 6633</a>, May 2012.
[<a id="ref-SIMPSON-DISCOV">SIMPSON-DISCOV</a>]
Simpson, W., "IPv6 Neighbor Discovery -- ICMP Message
Formats", Work in Progress, January 1995.
[<a id="ref-SIMPSON-MOBILITY">SIMPSON-MOBILITY</a>]
Simpson, W., <a style="text-decoration: none" href='https://www.google.com/search?sitesearch=datatracker.ietf.org%2Fdoc%2Fhtml%2F&q=inurl:draft-+%22IPv6+Mobility+Support%22'>"IPv6 Mobility Support"</a>, Work in Progress,
November 1994.
[<a id="ref-SKIP">SKIP</a>] Aziz, A., Markson, T., and H. Prafullchandra, "Simple
Key-Management For Internet Protocols (SKIP)", Work
in Progress, December 1995.
[<a id="ref-SKIP-ADP">SKIP-ADP</a>] Aziz, A., Markson, T., and H. Prafullchandra, "SKIP
Algorithm Discovery Protocol", Work in Progress,
December 1995.
<span class="grey">Gont & Pignataro Standards Track [Page 7]</span></pre>
<hr class='noprint'/><!--NewPage--><pre class='newpage'><span id="page-8" ></span>
<span class="grey"><a href="./rfc6918">RFC 6918</a> Deprecating Some ICMPv4 Messages April 2013</span>
Authors' Addresses
Fernando Gont
UTN-FRH / SI6 Networks
Evaristo Carriego 2644
Haedo, Provincia de Buenos Aires 1706
Argentina
Phone: +54 11 4650 8472
EMail: fgont@si6networks.com
URI: <a href="http://www.si6networks.com">http://www.si6networks.com</a>
Carlos Pignataro
Cisco Systems
7200-12 Kit Creek Road
Research Triangle Park, NC 27709
US
EMail: cpignata@cisco.com
Gont & Pignataro Standards Track [Page 8]
</pre>
|
