1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
|
<pre>Network Working Group D.W. Dodds
RFC # 702 BBN-TENEXA
September 25, 1974
<span class="h1">SEPTEMBER, 1974, SURVEY OF NEW-PROTOCOL TELNET SERVERS</span>
LAST MONTH'S SURVEY PRODUCED A GRATIFYING AMOUNT OF FEEDBACK CLARIFYING
THE STATUS OF SEVERAL SITES; HOWEVER THERE HAVE BEEN VERY FEW CHANGES IN
THE STATUS OF HOST SERVERS. THE CHANGES IN THIS MONTH'S LIST, IN
NUMERICAL ORDER (HOST NUMBER THROUGHOUT ARE OCTAL):
UCLA-NMC IS NO LONGER A SERVER;
HOST 205 IS NOW BBN-TENEXD, A NEW SYSTEM (BBNB) IS NOW HOST 61;
RAND-RCC WAS ACCIDENTALLY OMITTED FROM THE PREVIOUS LIST;
SDC-LAB HAS BEEN TEMPORARILY ELIMINATED FROM THE LIST UNTIL IT RETURNS
TO THE NET;
I4-TENEXA (117) IS NOT A SERVER--KI4B-TENEX (217) IS, AND HAS BEEN ADDED
TO THE LIST;
AMES-67 FIXED A BUG, REVEALING TO THE WORLD THE NEW-PROTOCOL SERVER (NO
OPTIONS) THAT WAS THERE ALL ALONG;
ISI-DEVTENEX (226) AND USC-ECL (327) HAVE BEEN ADDED.
WHAT FOLLOWS IS AN UPDATE OF THE SUMMARY AND TABULATION THAT APPEARED
LAST MONTH.* THERE IS STILL A LONG WAY TO GO TO 100% NEW-PROTOCOL
IMPLEMENTATION.
TOTAL SERVER HOSTS 34 100%
NO NEW-PROT SERVER 21 62%
TOTAL NEW-PROT IMPLEM. 13 38%
NEW-PROT ON SOCKET 27,
OLD ON SOCKET 1 (2) 6 18%
NEW-PROT ON 1 AND 27 (3) 6 18%
NEW-PROT ON 1 ONLY 1 3%
NOTES:
* ALL DATA IN THIS REPORT WERE GATHERED VIA A SURVEYING PROGRAM RUN AT
VARIOUS TIMES, PLUS A FEW MANUAL CHECKS TO FILL OUT THE DATA. WHAT
IS REPORTED HERE IS THE WAY THE VARIOUS SERVERS WORK AS SEEN BY THE
NEW-PROTOCOL USER TELNET AT BBNA, AS OF 23 SEPT. 1974.
(2) THESE ARE THE SITES WHOSE OPERATION IS 100% CORRECT ACCORDING TO ALL
PROTOCOL AND CONVENTIONS, AS I UNDERSTAND THEM.
(3) WE REALIZE THAT SOME OF THE SERVERS THAT APPEAR HERE AS NEW-PROTOCOL
SERVERS ON SOCKET 1 ARE ACTUALLY SERVERS WHICH ATTEMPT TO
COMMUNICATE WITH BOTH OLD- AND NEW-PROTOCOL USER TELNETS ACCORDING
TO WHAT CONTROL SEQUENCES ARE RECEIVED.
<span class="grey">Dodds [Page 1]</span></pre>
<hr class='noprint'/><!--NewPage--><pre class='newpage'><span id="page-2" ></span>
<span class="grey"><a href="./rfc702">RFC 702</a> SURVEY OF NEW-PROTOCOL TELNET SERVERS September 1974</span>
TABULATION OF SERVER STATUS FOR ALL SERVER SITES:
HOST HOST SOCKET SOCKET NEW-PROT, OPTIONS
NO. NAME 1 27 IMPLETMENTED(IF ANY)
<span class="h2"><a class="selflink" id="section-101" href="#section-101">101</a> UCLA-CCN </span> OLD X
<span class="h2"><a class="selflink" id="section-201" href="#section-201">201</a> UCLA-CCBS </span> OLD X
2 SRI-ARC OLD X
<span class="h2"><a class="selflink" id="section-102" href="#section-102">102</a> SRI-AI </span> OLD X
3 UCSB-MOD75 OLD X
4 UTAH-10 OLD X
<span class="h2"><a class="selflink" id="section-105" href="#section-105">105</a> BBN-TENEX </span> OLD NEW I1, 3, 6; O3
<span class="h2"><a class="selflink" id="section-205" href="#section-205">205</a> BBN TENEXD </span> OLD NEW I1, 3, 6; O3
<span class="h2"><a class="selflink" id="section-305" href="#section-305">305</a> BBN-TENEXA </span> OLD NEW I1, 3, 6; O3
<span class="h2"><a class="selflink" id="section-106" href="#section-106">106</a> MIT-DMS </span> NEW NEW I1, 3; O3
<span class="h2"><a class="selflink" id="section-206" href="#section-206">206</a> MIT-AI </span> OLD X
<span class="h2"><a class="selflink" id="section-306" href="#section-306">306</a> MIT-ML </span> OLD X
7 RAND-RCC OLD X
11 HARV-10 NEW X I1, 3; O3
12 LL-67 OLD X
<span class="h2"><a class="selflink" id="section-112" href="#section-112">112</a> LL-TX-2 </span> OLD X
13 SU-AI NEW* NEW* I1, 3
15 CASE-10 OLD X
16 CMU-10B NEW NEW I1, 3; O3
<span class="h2"><a class="selflink" id="section-116" href="#section-116">116</a> CMU-10A </span> NEW NEW I1, 3; O3
17 I4-TENEX OLD X
<span class="h2"><a class="selflink" id="section-217" href="#section-217">217</a> KI4B-TENEX </span> OLD X
20 AMES-67 NEW NEW NONE
<span class="h2"><a class="selflink" id="section-126" href="#section-126">126</a> USC-ISI </span> OLD X
<span class="h2"><a class="selflink" id="section-226" href="#section-226">226</a> ISI-DEVTENEX </span> OLD X
27 USC-44 OLD X
<span class="h2"><a class="selflink" id="section-327" href="#section-327">327</a> USC-ECL </span> OLD X
32 SDAC-44 OLD X
37 CCA-TENEX OLD X
40 PARC-MAXC OLD NEW I1,3,6; O3
43 UCSD-CC OLD NEW I0(!), 3; O0, 3
53 OFFICE-1 OLD X
54 MIT-MULTICS NEW NEW NONE
61 BBN-TENEXB OLD NEW I1, 3, 6; O3
<span class="grey">Dodds [Page 2]</span></pre>
<hr class='noprint'/><!--NewPage--><pre class='newpage'><span id="page-3" ></span>
<span class="grey"><a href="./rfc702">RFC 702</a> SURVEY OF NEW-PROTOCOL TELNET SERVERS September 1974</span>
KEY TO SERVER STATUS TABLE:
X NO SERVER AT THIS SOCKET
I# OPTION # IMPLEMENTED INCOMING TO USER
(SERVER SAYS "WILL #")
O# OPTION # IMPLEMENTED OUTGOING FROM USER
(SERVER SAYS "DO #")
(# IS OPTION NUMBER IN NEW PROTOCOL. ALL OPTIONS
IMPLEMENTED BY ANYONE ARE:
0 TRANSMIT-BINARY
1 ECHO
3 SUPPRESS-GO-AHEAD
6 TIMING-MARK)
NOTE: * THERE APPEARS TO BE A MINOR BUG IN SU-AI'S SERVER: IT SEEMS TO
SEND AN IMPROPER RESPONSE TO A REQUEST FOR OPTION 0.
[ This RFC was put into machine readable form for entry ]
[ into the online RFC archives by Alex McKenzie with ]
[ support from GTE, formerly BBN Corp. 11/99 ]
Dodds [Page 3]
</pre>
|
