1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
|
<pre>Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) K. Raza
Request for Comments: 7506 Cisco Systems, Inc.
Updates: <a href="./rfc4379">4379</a> N. Akiya
Category: Standards Track Big Switch Networks
ISSN: 2070-1721 C. Pignataro
Cisco Systems, Inc.
April 2015
<span class="h1">IPv6 Router Alert Option</span>
<span class="h1">for MPLS Operations, Administration, and Maintenance (OAM)</span>
Abstract
<a href="./rfc4379">RFC 4379</a> defines the MPLS Label Switched Path (LSP) Ping/Traceroute
mechanism in which the Router Alert Option (RAO) MUST be set in the
IP header of the MPLS Echo Request messages and may conditionally be
set in the IP header of the MPLS Echo Reply messages depending on the
Reply Mode used. While a generic "Router shall examine packet"
Option Value is used for the IPv4 RAO, there is no generic RAO value
defined for IPv6 that can be used. This document allocates a new,
generic IPv6 RAO value that can be used by MPLS Operations,
Administration, and Maintenance (OAM) tools, including the MPLS Echo
Request and MPLS Echo Reply messages for MPLS in IPv6 environments.
Consequently, it updates <a href="./rfc4379">RFC 4379</a>.
The initial motivation to request an IPv6 RAO value for MPLS OAM
comes from the MPLS LSP Ping/Traceroute. However, this value is
applicable to all MPLS OAM and not limited to MPLS LSP Ping/
Traceroute.
Status of This Memo
This is an Internet Standards Track document.
This document is a product of the Internet Engineering Task Force
(IETF). It represents the consensus of the IETF community. It has
received public review and has been approved for publication by the
Internet Engineering Steering Group (IESG). Further information on
Internet Standards is available in <a href="./rfc5741#section-2">Section 2 of RFC 5741</a>.
Information about the current status of this document, any errata,
and how to provide feedback on it may be obtained at
<a href="http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7506">http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7506</a>.
<span class="grey">Raza, et al. Standards Track [Page 1]</span></pre>
<hr class='noprint'/><!--NewPage--><pre class='newpage'><span id="page-2" ></span>
<span class="grey"><a href="./rfc7506">RFC 7506</a> MPLS OAM IPv6 Router Alert April 2015</span>
Copyright Notice
Copyright (c) 2015 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
document authors. All rights reserved.
This document is subject to <a href="https://www.rfc-editor.org/bcp/bcp78">BCP 78</a> and the IETF Trust's Legal
Provisions Relating to IETF Documents
(<a href="http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info">http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info</a>) in effect on the date of
publication of this document. Please review these documents
carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect
to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must
include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of
the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as
described in the Simplified BSD License.
Table of Contents
<a href="#section-1">1</a>. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . <a href="#page-2">2</a>
<a href="#section-2">2</a>. Specification of Requirements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . <a href="#page-3">3</a>
<a href="#section-3">3</a>. IPv6 RAO Value for MPLS OAM . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . <a href="#page-3">3</a>
<a href="#section-4">4</a>. Updates to <a href="./rfc4379">RFC 4379</a> . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . <a href="#page-3">3</a>
<a href="#section-5">5</a>. IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . <a href="#page-4">4</a>
<a href="#section-6">6</a>. Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . <a href="#page-4">4</a>
<a href="#section-7">7</a>. References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . <a href="#page-4">4</a>
<a href="#section-7.1">7.1</a>. Normative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . <a href="#page-4">4</a>
<a href="#section-7.2">7.2</a>. Informative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . <a href="#page-5">5</a>
Acknowledgements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . <a href="#page-5">5</a>
Authors' Addresses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . <a href="#page-6">6</a>
<span class="h2"><a class="selflink" id="section-1" href="#section-1">1</a>. Introduction</span>
A commonly deployed MPLS OAM tool is specified in [<a href="./rfc4379" title=""Detecting Multi-Protocol Label Switched (MPLS) Data Plane Failures"">RFC4379</a>],
"Detecting Multi-Protocol Label Switched (MPLS) Data Plane Failures",
which is used to diagnose MPLS network data planes. This
specification, often referred to as "MPLS LSP Ping/Traceroute"
[<a href="./rfc4379" title=""Detecting Multi-Protocol Label Switched (MPLS) Data Plane Failures"">RFC4379</a>], requires the use of the Router Alert Option (RAO) in the
IP header. For example, <a href="./rfc4379#section-4.3">Section 4.3 of [RFC4379]</a> states that the IP
RAO MUST be set in the IP header of an MPLS Echo Request message.
Similarly, <a href="./rfc4379#section-4.5">Section 4.5 of [RFC4379]</a> states that the IP RAO MUST be
set in the IP header of an MPLS Echo Reply message if the Reply Mode
in the Echo Request is set to "Reply via an IPv4/IPv6 UDP packet with
Router Alert".
[<a id="ref-RFC2113">RFC2113</a>] defines a generic Option Value 0x0 for IPv4 RAO that is
used in LSP Ping and LSP Traceroute for MPLS in IPv4 environments.
This IPv4 RAO value of 0x0 is assigned to "Router shall examine
packet". However, currently there is no generic IPV6 RAO value
defined that can be used in LSP Ping and LSP Traceroute for MPLS in
<span class="grey">Raza, et al. Standards Track [Page 2]</span></pre>
<hr class='noprint'/><!--NewPage--><pre class='newpage'><span id="page-3" ></span>
<span class="grey"><a href="./rfc7506">RFC 7506</a> MPLS OAM IPv6 Router Alert April 2015</span>
IPv6 environments. Specifically, [<a href="./rfc2711" title=""IPv6 Router Alert Option"">RFC2711</a>] defined the Router Alert
for a general IPv6 purpose but required the Value field in the RAO to
indicate a specific reason for using the RAO. Because there is no
defined value for MPLS LSP Ping/Traceroute use or for general use, it
is not possible for MPLS OAM tools to use the IPv6 Router Alert
mechanism.
As vendors are starting to implement MPLS on the IPv6 control plane
(e.g., [<a href="#ref-LDP-IPV6" title=""Updates to LDP for IPv6"">LDP-IPV6</a>]), there is a need to define and allocate such an
Option Value for IPv6 in order to comply with [<a href="./rfc4379" title=""Detecting Multi-Protocol Label Switched (MPLS) Data Plane Failures"">RFC4379</a>]. This
document defines a new IPv6 RAO value that can be used by MPLS OAM
tools, including the MPLS Echo Request and MPLS Echo Reply messages
for MPLS in IPv6 environments.
This document closes the gap discussed in the third paragraph of
<a href="./rfc7439#section-3.4.2">Section 3.4.2 in [RFC7439]</a>.
<span class="h2"><a class="selflink" id="section-2" href="#section-2">2</a>. Specification of Requirements</span>
The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
"SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this
document are to be interpreted as described in [<a href="./rfc2119" title=""Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels"">RFC2119</a>].
<span class="h2"><a class="selflink" id="section-3" href="#section-3">3</a>. IPv6 RAO Value for MPLS OAM</span>
This document defines a new Option Value (69) for the IPv6 RAO to
alert transit routers to examine the packet more closely for MPLS OAM
purposes. This Option Value is used by any MPLS OAM application that
requires their packets to be examined by a transit router.
In the scope of this document, this Option Value will be used by the
MPLS Echo Request and MPLS Echo Reply for its IPv6 messages, as is
required by [<a href="./rfc4379" title=""Detecting Multi-Protocol Label Switched (MPLS) Data Plane Failures"">RFC4379</a>].
<span class="h2"><a class="selflink" id="section-4" href="#section-4">4</a>. Updates to <a href="./rfc4379">RFC 4379</a></span>
[<a id="ref-RFC4379">RFC4379</a>] specifies the use of the RAO in the IP header. Sections
4.3 and 4.5 of [<a href="./rfc4379" title=""Detecting Multi-Protocol Label Switched (MPLS) Data Plane Failures"">RFC4379</a>] are updated as follows:
For every time in which the "Router Alert IP Option" is used, the
following text is appended:
In case of an IPv4 header, the generic IPv4 RAO value 0x0
[<a href="./rfc2113" title=""IP Router Alert Option"">RFC2113</a>] SHOULD be used. In case of an IPv6 header, the IPv6 RAO
value (69) allocated through this document for MPLS OAM MUST be
used.
<span class="grey">Raza, et al. Standards Track [Page 3]</span></pre>
<hr class='noprint'/><!--NewPage--><pre class='newpage'><span id="page-4" ></span>
<span class="grey"><a href="./rfc7506">RFC 7506</a> MPLS OAM IPv6 Router Alert April 2015</span>
<span class="h2"><a class="selflink" id="section-5" href="#section-5">5</a>. IANA Considerations</span>
This document defines a new value (69) for the IPv6 RAO to alert
transit routers to examine the packet more closely for MPLS OAM
purposes. IANA has assigned a new code point under its "IPv6 Router
Alert Option Values" registry defined by [<a href="./rfc2711" title=""IPv6 Router Alert Option"">RFC2711</a>], updated by
[<a href="./rfc5350" title=""IANA Considerations for the IPv4 and IPv6 Router Alert Options"">RFC5350</a>], and maintained in [<a href="#ref-IANA-IPv6-RAO">IANA-IPv6-RAO</a>]. The new code point is
as follows:
Value Description Reference
----- ------------------------------- ---------------
69 MPLS OAM <a href="./rfc7506">RFC 7506</a>
<span class="h2"><a class="selflink" id="section-6" href="#section-6">6</a>. Security Considerations</span>
This document introduces no new security concerns in addition to what
have already been captured in [<a href="./rfc4379" title=""Detecting Multi-Protocol Label Switched (MPLS) Data Plane Failures"">RFC4379</a>] and [<a href="./rfc6398" title=""IP Router Alert Considerations and Usage"">RFC6398</a>], the latter of
which expands the security considerations of [<a href="./rfc2113" title=""IP Router Alert Option"">RFC2113</a>] and [<a href="./rfc2711" title=""IPv6 Router Alert Option"">RFC2711</a>].
IPv6 packets containing the MPLS OAM RAO are encapsulated with an
MPLS header and are not expected to be inspected by every label
switched hop within an MPLS LSP. Consequently, this value of the RAO
will be processed by the appropriate router and is not subject to the
problem of being ignored, as described in <a href="./rfc7045#section-2.2">Section 2.2 of [RFC7045]</a>.
<span class="h2"><a class="selflink" id="section-7" href="#section-7">7</a>. References</span>
<span class="h3"><a class="selflink" id="section-7.1" href="#section-7.1">7.1</a>. Normative References</span>
[<a id="ref-RFC2119">RFC2119</a>] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate
Requirement Levels", <a href="https://www.rfc-editor.org/bcp/bcp14">BCP 14</a>, <a href="./rfc2119">RFC 2119</a>, March 1997,
<<a href="http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2119">http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2119</a>>.
[<a id="ref-RFC2711">RFC2711</a>] Partridge, C. and A. Jackson, "IPv6 Router Alert Option",
<a href="./rfc2711">RFC 2711</a>, October 1999,
<<a href="http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2711">http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2711</a>>.
[<a id="ref-RFC4379">RFC4379</a>] Kompella, K. and G. Swallow, "Detecting Multi-Protocol
Label Switched (MPLS) Data Plane Failures", <a href="./rfc4379">RFC 4379</a>,
February 2006, <<a href="http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc4379">http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc4379</a>>.
[<a id="ref-RFC5350">RFC5350</a>] Manner, J. and A. McDonald, "IANA Considerations for the
IPv4 and IPv6 Router Alert Options", <a href="./rfc5350">RFC 5350</a>, September
2008, <<a href="http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5350">http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5350</a>>.
[<a id="ref-RFC6398">RFC6398</a>] Le Faucheur, F., Ed., "IP Router Alert Considerations and
Usage", <a href="https://www.rfc-editor.org/bcp/bcp168">BCP 168</a>, <a href="./rfc6398">RFC 6398</a>, October 2011,
<<a href="http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6398">http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6398</a>>.
<span class="grey">Raza, et al. Standards Track [Page 4]</span></pre>
<hr class='noprint'/><!--NewPage--><pre class='newpage'><span id="page-5" ></span>
<span class="grey"><a href="./rfc7506">RFC 7506</a> MPLS OAM IPv6 Router Alert April 2015</span>
<span class="h3"><a class="selflink" id="section-7.2" href="#section-7.2">7.2</a>. Informative References</span>
[<a id="ref-IANA-IPv6-RAO">IANA-IPv6-RAO</a>]
IANA, "IPv6 Router Alert Option Values",
<<a href="http://www.iana.org/assignments/ipv6-routeralert-values">http://www.iana.org/assignments/ipv6-routeralert-values</a>>.
[<a id="ref-LDP-IPV6">LDP-IPV6</a>] Asati, R., Pignataro, C., Raza, K., Manral, V., and R.
Papneja, "Updates to LDP for IPv6", Work in Progress,
<a href="./draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-ipv6-17">draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-ipv6-17</a>, February 2015.
[<a id="ref-RFC2113">RFC2113</a>] Katz, D., "IP Router Alert Option", <a href="./rfc2113">RFC 2113</a>, February
1997, <<a href="http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2113">http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2113</a>>.
[<a id="ref-RFC7045">RFC7045</a>] Carpenter, B. and S. Jiang, "Transmission and Processing
of IPv6 Extension Headers", <a href="./rfc7045">RFC 7045</a>, December 2013,
<<a href="http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7045">http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7045</a>>.
[<a id="ref-RFC7439">RFC7439</a>] George, W., Ed. and C. Pignataro, Ed., "Gap Analysis for
Operating IPv6-Only MPLS Networks", <a href="./rfc7439">RFC 7439</a>, January
2015, <<a href="http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7439">http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7439</a>>.
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank George Swallow, Ole Troan, Bob
Hinden, Faisal Iqbal, Mathew Janelle, and Gregory Mirsky for their
useful input.
<span class="grey">Raza, et al. Standards Track [Page 5]</span></pre>
<hr class='noprint'/><!--NewPage--><pre class='newpage'><span id="page-6" ></span>
<span class="grey"><a href="./rfc7506">RFC 7506</a> MPLS OAM IPv6 Router Alert April 2015</span>
Authors' Addresses
Kamran Raza
Cisco Systems, Inc.
2000 Innovation Drive
Kanata, ON K2K-3E8
Canada
EMail: skraza@cisco.com
Nobo Akiya
Big Switch Networks
EMail: nobo.akiya.dev@gmail.com
Carlos Pignataro
Cisco Systems, Inc.
7200-12 Kit Creek Road
Research Triangle Park, NC 27709
United States
EMail: cpignata@cisco.com
Raza, et al. Standards Track [Page 6]
</pre>
|
