1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
|
<pre>Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) B. Decraene
Request for Comments: 7537 Orange
Updates: <a href="./rfc4379">4379</a>, <a href="./rfc6424">6424</a> N. Akiya
Category: Standards Track C. Pignataro
ISSN: 2070-1721 Cisco Systems
L. Andersson
S. Aldrin
Huawei Technologies
May 2015
<span class="h1">IANA Registries for LSP Ping Code Points</span>
Abstract
RFCs 4379 and 6424 created name spaces for Multi-Protocol Label
Switching (MPLS) Label Switched Path (LSP) Ping. However, those RFCs
did not create the corresponding IANA registries for Downstream
Mapping object Flags (DS Flags), Multipath Types, Pad TLVs, and
Interface and Label Stack Address Types.
There is now a need to make further code point allocations from these
name spaces. This document updates RFCs 4379 and 6424 in that it
creates IANA registries for that purpose.
Status of This Memo
This is an Internet Standards Track document.
This document is a product of the Internet Engineering Task Force
(IETF). It represents the consensus of the IETF community. It has
received public review and has been approved for publication by the
Internet Engineering Steering Group (IESG). Further information on
Internet Standards is available in <a href="./rfc5741#section-2">Section 2 of RFC 5741</a>.
Information about the current status of this document, any errata,
and how to provide feedback on it may be obtained at
<a href="http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7537">http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7537</a>.
<span class="grey">Decraene, et al. Standards Track [Page 1]</span></pre>
<hr class='noprint'/><!--NewPage--><pre class='newpage'><span id="page-2" ></span>
<span class="grey"><a href="./rfc7537">RFC 7537</a> IANA Registries for LSP Ping May 2015</span>
Copyright Notice
Copyright (c) 2015 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
document authors. All rights reserved.
This document is subject to <a href="https://www.rfc-editor.org/bcp/bcp78">BCP 78</a> and the IETF Trust's Legal
Provisions Relating to IETF Documents
(<a href="http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info">http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info</a>) in effect on the date of
publication of this document. Please review these documents
carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect
to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must
include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of
the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as
described in the Simplified BSD License.
Table of Contents
<a href="#section-1">1</a>. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . <a href="#page-2">2</a>
<a href="#section-2">2</a>. IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . <a href="#page-3">3</a>
<a href="#section-2.1">2.1</a>. DS Flags . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . <a href="#page-3">3</a>
<a href="#section-2.2">2.2</a>. Multipath Types . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . <a href="#page-3">3</a>
<a href="#section-2.3">2.3</a>. Pad Type . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . <a href="#page-4">4</a>
<a href="#section-2.4">2.4</a>. Interface and Label Stack Address Type . . . . . . . . . <a href="#page-5">5</a>
<a href="#section-3">3</a>. Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . <a href="#page-5">5</a>
<a href="#section-4">4</a>. References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . <a href="#page-6">6</a>
<a href="#section-4.1">4.1</a>. Normative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . <a href="#page-6">6</a>
<a href="#section-4.2">4.2</a>. Informative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . <a href="#page-6">6</a>
Authors' Addresses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . <a href="#page-7">7</a>
<span class="h2"><a class="selflink" id="section-1" href="#section-1">1</a>. Introduction</span>
[<a id="ref-RFC4379">RFC4379</a>] and [<a href="./rfc6424" title=""Mechanism for Performing Label Switched Path Ping (LSP Ping) over MPLS Tunnels"">RFC6424</a>] created name spaces for MPLS LSP Ping.
However, those RFCs did not create the corresponding IANA registries
for DS Flags, Multipath Types, Pad TLVs, and Interface and Label
Stack Address Types.
There is now a need to make further code point allocations from these
name spaces. In particular, [<a href="#ref-ENTROPY-LSP-PING">ENTROPY-LSP-PING</a>] and [<a href="#ref-LSP-PING-LAG">LSP-PING-LAG</a>]
request new DS Flags and Multipath Type allocations.
This document updates [<a href="./rfc4379" title=""Detecting Multi-Protocol Label Switched (MPLS) Data Plane Failures"">RFC4379</a>] and [<a href="./rfc6424" title=""Mechanism for Performing Label Switched Path Ping (LSP Ping) over MPLS Tunnels"">RFC6424</a>] in that it creates IANA
registries for that purpose.
Note that "DS Flags" and "Multipath Type" are fields included in two
TLVs defined in the "Multi-Protocol Label Switching (MPLS) Label
Switched Paths (LSPs) Ping Parameters - TLVs" registry: Downstream
Mapping (DEPRECATED) (value 2) and Downstream Detailed Mapping (value
20). Modification to either registry will affect both TLVs.
<span class="grey">Decraene, et al. Standards Track [Page 2]</span></pre>
<hr class='noprint'/><!--NewPage--><pre class='newpage'><span id="page-3" ></span>
<span class="grey"><a href="./rfc7537">RFC 7537</a> IANA Registries for LSP Ping May 2015</span>
<span class="h2"><a class="selflink" id="section-2" href="#section-2">2</a>. IANA Considerations</span>
Per this document, IANA has created new registries within the "Multi-
Protocol Label Switching (MPLS) Label Switched Paths (LSPs) Ping
Parameters" [<a href="#ref-IANA-MPLS-LSP-PING">IANA-MPLS-LSP-PING</a>] registry to maintain DS Flags,
Multipath Types, Pad TLVs, and Interface and Label Stack Address
Types fields. The registry names and initial values are described in
the immediate subsections that follow.
<span class="h3"><a class="selflink" id="section-2.1" href="#section-2.1">2.1</a>. DS Flags</span>
[<a id="ref-RFC4379">RFC4379</a>] defines the Downstream Mapping (DSMAP) TLV, which has Type
2 assigned from the "Multi-Protocol Label Switching (MPLS) Label
Switched Paths (LSPs) Ping Parameters - TLVs" registry.
[<a id="ref-RFC6424">RFC6424</a>] defines the Downstream Detailed Mapping (DDMAP) TLV, which
has Type 20 assigned from the "Multi-Protocol Label Switching (MPLS)
Label Switched Paths (LSPs) Ping Parameters - TLVs" registry.
DSMAP has been deprecated by DDMAP, but both TLVs share a field: DS
Flags.
IANA has created and now maintains a registry entitled "DS Flags".
The registration policy for this registry is Standards Action
[<a href="./rfc5226" title="">RFC5226</a>].
IANA has made the following initial assignments:
Registry Name: DS Flags
Bit number Name Reference
---------- ---------------------------------------- ---------
7 N: Treat as a Non-IP Packet <a href="./rfc4379">RFC 4379</a>
6 I: Interface and Label Stack Object Request <a href="./rfc4379">RFC 4379</a>
5-0 Unassigned
<span class="h3"><a class="selflink" id="section-2.2" href="#section-2.2">2.2</a>. Multipath Types</span>
IANA has created and now maintains a registry entitled "Multipath
Types".
The registration policies [<a href="./rfc5226" title="">RFC5226</a>] for this registry are as follows:
0-250 Standards Action
251-254 Experimental Use
255 Standards Action
<span class="grey">Decraene, et al. Standards Track [Page 3]</span></pre>
<hr class='noprint'/><!--NewPage--><pre class='newpage'><span id="page-4" ></span>
<span class="grey"><a href="./rfc7537">RFC 7537</a> IANA Registries for LSP Ping May 2015</span>
IANA has made the following initial assignments:
Registry Name: Multipath Types
Value Meaning Reference
---------- ---------------------------------------- ---------
0 no multipath <a href="./rfc4379">RFC 4379</a>
1 Unassigned
2 IP address <a href="./rfc4379">RFC 4379</a>
3 Unassigned
4 IP address range <a href="./rfc4379">RFC 4379</a>
5-7 Unassigned
8 Bit-masked IP address set <a href="./rfc4379">RFC 4379</a>
9 Bit-masked label set <a href="./rfc4379">RFC 4379</a>
10-250 Unassigned
251-254 Experimental Use This document
255 Reserved This document
<span class="h3"><a class="selflink" id="section-2.3" href="#section-2.3">2.3</a>. Pad Type</span>
IANA has created and now maintains a registry entitled "Pad Types".
The registration policies [<a href="./rfc5226" title="">RFC5226</a>] for this registry are:
0-250 Standards Action
251-254 Experimental Use
255 Standards Action
IANA has made the following initial assignments:
Registry Name: Pad Types
Value Meaning Reference
---------- ---------------------------------------- ---------
0 Reserved This document
1 Drop Pad TLV from reply <a href="./rfc4379">RFC 4379</a>
2 Copy Pad TLV to reply <a href="./rfc4379">RFC 4379</a>
3-250 Unassigned
251-254 Experimental Use This document
255 Reserved This document
<span class="grey">Decraene, et al. Standards Track [Page 4]</span></pre>
<hr class='noprint'/><!--NewPage--><pre class='newpage'><span id="page-5" ></span>
<span class="grey"><a href="./rfc7537">RFC 7537</a> IANA Registries for LSP Ping May 2015</span>
<span class="h3"><a class="selflink" id="section-2.4" href="#section-2.4">2.4</a>. Interface and Label Stack Address Type</span>
IANA has created and now maintains a registry entitled "Interface and
Label Stack Address Types".
The registration policies [<a href="./rfc5226" title="">RFC5226</a>] for this registry are:
0-250 Standards Action
251-254 Experimental Use
255 Standards Action
IANA has made the following initial assignments:
Registry Name: Interface and Label Stack Address Types
Value Meaning Reference
---------- ---------------------------------------- ---------
0 Reserved This document
1 IPv4 Numbered <a href="./rfc4379">RFC 4379</a>
2 IPv4 Unnumbered <a href="./rfc4379">RFC 4379</a>
3 IPv6 Numbered <a href="./rfc4379">RFC 4379</a>
4 IPv6 Unnumbered <a href="./rfc4379">RFC 4379</a>
5-250 Unassigned
251-254 Experimental Use This document
255 Reserved This document
<span class="h2"><a class="selflink" id="section-3" href="#section-3">3</a>. Security Considerations</span>
This document simply creates IANA registries for code points defined
in [<a href="./rfc4379" title=""Detecting Multi-Protocol Label Switched (MPLS) Data Plane Failures"">RFC4379</a>] and [<a href="./rfc6424" title=""Mechanism for Performing Label Switched Path Ping (LSP Ping) over MPLS Tunnels"">RFC6424</a>]. Thus, there are no new security
concerns.
<span class="grey">Decraene, et al. Standards Track [Page 5]</span></pre>
<hr class='noprint'/><!--NewPage--><pre class='newpage'><span id="page-6" ></span>
<span class="grey"><a href="./rfc7537">RFC 7537</a> IANA Registries for LSP Ping May 2015</span>
<span class="h2"><a class="selflink" id="section-4" href="#section-4">4</a>. References</span>
<span class="h3"><a class="selflink" id="section-4.1" href="#section-4.1">4.1</a>. Normative References</span>
[<a id="ref-RFC4379">RFC4379</a>] Kompella, K. and G. Swallow, "Detecting Multi-Protocol
Label Switched (MPLS) Data Plane Failures", <a href="./rfc4379">RFC 4379</a>,
February 2006, <<a href="http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc4379">http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc4379</a>>.
[<a id="ref-RFC6424">RFC6424</a>] Bahadur, N., Kompella, K., and G. Swallow, "Mechanism for
Performing Label Switched Path Ping (LSP Ping) over MPLS
Tunnels", <a href="./rfc6424">RFC 6424</a>, November 2011,
<<a href="http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6424">http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6424</a>>.
<span class="h3"><a class="selflink" id="section-4.2" href="#section-4.2">4.2</a>. Informative References</span>
[<a id="ref-ENTROPY-LSP-PING">ENTROPY-LSP-PING</a>]
Akiya, N., Swallow, G., Pignataro, C., Malis, A., and S.
Aldrin, "Label Switched Path (LSP) and Pseudowire (PW)
Ping/Trace over MPLS Network using Entropy Labels (EL)",
Work in Progress, <a href="./draft-ietf-mpls-entropy-lsp-ping-00">draft-ietf-mpls-entropy-lsp-ping-00</a>,
December 2014.
[<a id="ref-IANA-MPLS-LSP-PING">IANA-MPLS-LSP-PING</a>]
IANA, "Multi-Protocol Label Switching (MPLS) Label
Switched Paths (LSPs) Ping Parameters",
<<a href="http://www.iana.org/assignments/mpls-lsp-ping-parameters">http://www.iana.org/assignments/</a>
<a href="http://www.iana.org/assignments/mpls-lsp-ping-parameters">mpls-lsp-ping-parameters</a>>.
[<a id="ref-LSP-PING-LAG">LSP-PING-LAG</a>]
Akiya, N., Swallow, G., Litkowski, S., Decraene, B., and
J. Drake, "Label Switched Path (LSP) Ping/Trace Multipath
Support for Link Aggregation Group (LAG) Interfaces", Work
in Progress, <a href="./draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-lag-multipath-00">draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-lag-multipath-00</a>,
January 2015.
[<a id="ref-RFC5226">RFC5226</a>] Narten, T. and H. Alvestrand, "Guidelines for Writing an
IANA Considerations Section in RFCs", <a href="https://www.rfc-editor.org/bcp/bcp26">BCP 26</a>, <a href="./rfc5226">RFC 5226</a>,
May 2008, <<a href="http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5226">http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5226</a>>.
<span class="grey">Decraene, et al. Standards Track [Page 6]</span></pre>
<hr class='noprint'/><!--NewPage--><pre class='newpage'><span id="page-7" ></span>
<span class="grey"><a href="./rfc7537">RFC 7537</a> IANA Registries for LSP Ping May 2015</span>
Authors' Addresses
Bruno Decraene
Orange
EMail: bruno.decraene@orange.com
Nobo Akiya
Cisco Systems
EMail: nobo.akiya.dev@gmail.com
Carlos Pignataro
Cisco Systems
EMail: cpignata@cisco.com
Loa Andersson
Huawei Technologies
EMail: loa@mail01.huawei.com
Sam Aldrin
Huawei Technologies
EMail: aldrin.ietf@gmail.com
Decraene, et al. Standards Track [Page 7]
</pre>
|
