File: Infotec-4651_MF.xml

package info (click to toggle)
foomatic-db 20061031-1
  • links: PTS
  • area: main
  • in suites: etch, etch-m68k
  • size: 113,544 kB
  • ctags: 3
  • sloc: xml: 183,110; sh: 153; makefile: 123
file content (60 lines) | stat: -rw-r--r-- 1,737 bytes parent folder | download | duplicates (2) 
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
 
<printer id="printer/Infotec-4651_MF">
  <make>Infotec</make>
  <model>4651 MF</model>
  <mechanism>
    <laser/><!--not "color"-->
    <resolution>
      <dpi>
        <x>600</x>
        <y>600</y>
      </dpi>
    </resolution>
    <consumables>
      <comments>
        <en>toner</en>
      </comments>
    <!--one or more "partno" elements.--></consumables>
  </mechanism>
  <url>http://www.danka.de</url>
  <lang>
    <postscript level="3">
    <!--unknown ppd filename "ppd"--></postscript><!--no pjl-->
    <text>
      <charset>us-ascii</charset>
    </text>
  </lang>
  <autodetect>
    <parallel>
    </parallel>
  </autodetect>
  <functionality>A</functionality>
  <driver>pxlmono</driver>
  <!--no "contrib_url"-->
  <comments>
    <en>

    I used the original PPD with CUPS (supposedly just written to
    support MacOS and MS Win printing). All options can be used:
    select 1 of 5 trays; choose A4, Letter, A3 etc.; duplex printing;
    safe toner (draft printing); switch back to 400 dpi;inline
    finishing with stapling and punching (if you&apos;ve got the
    Finisher 3000 installed).&lt;p&gt;

    The standard equipment is with PDL support of PCL 5e and PCL 6;
    you can have PostScript 3 as an option - this
 is what I had at
    my disposal and what I only used.&lt;p&gt;

    It is doing 65 A4 ppm and is good for 20.000 to 120.000 prints per
    month. This machine is often to be found in semi-professional
    environments, large offices etc. with the named printing
    volume.&lt;p&gt;

    It is an OEM product based on a nearly identical Ricoh device (the
    Ricoh name of which I&apos;ll have to find out first).&lt;p&gt;

    (tested by Kurt Pfeifle)&lt;p&gt;

    </en>
  </comments>
</printer>