1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272
|
<Chapter><Heading>Group theoretic computations</Heading>
<Section><Heading>Third homotopy group of a supsension of an Eilenberg-MacLane space </Heading>
<P/>The following example uses the nonabelian tensor square of groups to compute
the third homotopy group
<P/><M>\pi_3(S(K(G,1))) = \mathbb Z^{30}</M>
<P/>of the suspension of the Eigenberg-MacLane space <M>K(G,1)</M>
for <M>G</M> the free nilpotent group of class <M>2</M> on four generators.
<Example>
<#Include SYSTEM "tutex/5.1.txt">
</Example>
</Section>
<Section><Heading>Representations of knot quandles</Heading>
<P/> The following example constructs the finitely presented
quandles associated to the granny knot and square knot, and then computes
the number of quandle homomorphisms from these two finitely prresented quandles to the <M>17</M>-th quandle in <B>HAP</B>'s library of connected quandles of order <M>24</M>. The number of homomorphisms differs between the two cases. The computation therefore establishes that the complement in <M>\mathbb R^3</M>
of the granny knot is not homeomorphic to the complement of the square knot.
<Example>
<#Include SYSTEM "tutex/5.2.txt">
</Example>
<P/> The following commands compute a knot quandle directly from a pdf file containing the following hand-drawn image of the knot.
<P/>
<Alt Only="HTML"><img src="images/myknot.png" align="center" height="160" alt="hand-drawn image of the trefoil knot"/>
</Alt>
<Example>
<#Include SYSTEM "tutex/5.2A.txt">
</Example>
</Section>
<Section><Heading>Identifying knots</Heading>
Low index subgrops of the knot group can be used to identify knots with few crossings. For instance, the following commands read in the following image of a knot and identify it as a sum of two trefoils. The commands determine the prime components only up to reflection, and so they don't distinguish between the granny and square knots.
<P/>
<Alt Only="HTML"><img src="images/myknot2.png" align="center" height="160" alt="hand-drawn image of a knot"/>
</Alt>
<Example>
<#Include SYSTEM "tutex/5.2B.txt">
</Example>
</Section>
<Section><Heading>Aspherical <M>2</M>-complexes</Heading>
<P/>The following example uses Polymake's linear programming routines to
establish that the <M>2</M>-complex associated to the group presentation <M><x,y,z : xyx=yxy,\, yzy=zyz,\, xzx=zxz></M> is aspherical (that is, has contractible universal cover). The presentation is Tietze equivalent to the presentation used in the computer code, and the associated <M>2</M>-complexes are thus homotopy equivalent.
<Example>
<#Include SYSTEM "tutex/5.3.txt">
</Example>
</Section>
<Section><Heading>Group presentations and homotopical syzygies</Heading>
Free resolutons for a group <M>G</M> are constructed in <B>HAP</B>
as the cellular chain complex <M>R_\ast=C_\ast(\tilde X)</M> of the universal cover of some
CW-complex <M>X=K(G,1)</M>. The <M>2</M>-skeleton of
<M>X</M> gives rise to a free presentation for the group <M>G</M>.
This presentation depends on a choice of maximal tree in the <M>1</M>-skeleton of <M>X</M> in cases where <M>X</M> has more than one <M>0</M>-cell. The attaching maps of
<M>3</M>-cells in <M>X</M> can be regarded as
<E>homotopical syzygies</E> or van Kampen diagrams over the group presentation whose boundaries spell the trivial word.
<P/>The following example constructs four terms of
a resolution for the free abelian group <M>G</M> on <M>n=3</M> generators, and then extracts the group presentation
from the resolution as well as the unique homotopical syzygy. The syzygy is visualized in terms of its graph of edges,
directed edges being coloured according to the corresponding
group generator. (In this example the CW-complex <M>\tilde X</M> is regular, but in cases where it is not the visualization may be a quotient of the <M>1</M>-skeleton of the syzygy.)
<Example>
<#Include SYSTEM "tutex/5.13.txt">
</Example>
<P/>
<Alt Only="HTML"><img src="images/syzfab.gif" align="center" height="160" alt="Homotopical syzygy for the free abelian group on three generators"/>
</Alt>
<P/>
This homotopical syzygy represents a relationship between the three relators <M>[x,y]</M>, <M>[x,z]</M> and <M>[y,z]</M> where <M>[x,y]=xyx^{-1}y^{-1}</M>. The syzygy can be thought of as a geometric relationship between commutators corresponding to the well-known Hall-Witt identity:
<P/><M> [\ [x,y],\ {^yz}\ ]\ \ [\ [y,z],\ {^zx}\ ]\ \ [\ [z,x],\ {^xy}\ ]\ \ =\ \ 1\ \ .</M>
<P/>The homotopical syzygy is special since in this example the edge directions and labels can be understood as specifying three homeomorphisms
between pairs of faces. Viewing the syzygy as the boundary of the <M>3</M>-ball, by using the homeomorphisms to identify the faces in each face pair we obtain a quotient CW-complex <M>M</M>
involving one vertex, three edges, three <M>2</M>-cells and one <M>3</M>-cell. The cell structure on the quotient exists because,
under the restrictions of homomorphisms to the edges, any cycle of edges retricts to the identity map on any given edge. The following
result tells us that <M>M</M> is in fact a closed oriented compact <M>3</M>-manifold.
<P/><B>Theorem.</B> [Seifert u. Threlfall, Topologie, p.208] <E>Let <M>S^2</M> denote the boundary
of the <M>3</M>-ball <M>B^3</M> and suppose
that the sphere <M>S^2</M> is given a regular CW-structure in which the faces are partitioned into a collection of face pairs. Suppose that for each face pair there is an orientation reversing homeomorphism between the two faces that sends edges to edges and vertices
to vertices. Suppose that by using these homeomorphisms to identity face pairs we obtain a (not necessarily regular) CW-structure on the quotient <M>M</M>. Then <M>M</M> is a closed compact orientable manifold if and only if its Euler characteristic is <M>\chi(M)=0</M>.</E>
<P/>The next commands construct a presentation and associated unique homotopical syzygy for the free nilpotent group of class <M>c=2</M> on <M>n=2</M> generators.
<Example>
<#Include SYSTEM "tutex/5.14.txt">
</Example>
<P/>
<Alt Only="HTML"><img src="images/syznil.gif" align="center" height="160" alt="Homotopical syzygy for the free nilpotent group of class two on two generators"/>
</Alt>
<P/>The syzygy represents the following relationship between commutators (in a free group).
<P/><M> [\ [x^{-1},y][x,y]\ ,\ [y,x][y^{-1},x]y^{-1}\ ]\ [\ [y,x][y^{-1},x]\
, \ x^{-1} \ ] \ \ =\ \ 1</M>
<P/>
Again, using the theorem of Seifert and Threlfall we see that the free nilpotent group of class two on two generators arises as
the fundamental group of a closed compact orientable <M>3</M>-manifold
<M>M</M>.
</Section>
<Section><Heading>Bogomolov multiplier</Heading>
<P/>The Bogomolov multiplier of a group is an isoclinism invariant. Using this property, the following example shows that there are precisely three groups of
order <M>243</M> with non-trivial Bogomolov multiplier. The groups in question are numbered 28, 29 and 30 in <B>GAP</B>'s library of small groups of order <M>243</M>.
<Example>
<#Include SYSTEM "tutex/5.4.txt">
</Example>
</Section>
<Section Label="secExtensions"><Heading>Second group cohomology and group extensions</Heading>
Any group extension <M>N\rightarrowtail E \twoheadrightarrow G</M> gives rise to:
<List>
<Item> an outer action <M>\alpha\colon G\rightarrow Out(G)</M> of <M>G</M> on <M>N</M>.</Item>
<Item>an action <M>G\rightarrow Aut(Z(N))</M> of <M>G</M> on the centre of <M>N</M>, uniquely induced by the outer action <M>\alpha</M> and the canonical action of <M>Out(N)</M> on <M>Z(N)</M>.</Item>
<Item>a <M>2</M>-cocycle <M>f\colon G\times G\rightarrow Z(N)</M> with values in the <M>G</M>-module <M>A=Z(N)</M>.</Item>
</List>
<P/>Any outer homomorphism <M>\alpha\colon G\rightarrow Out(N)</M> gives rise to a cohomology class <M>k</M> in <M>H^3(G,Z(N))</M>. It was shown by Eilenberg and Mac<M>\,</M>Lane that the class <M>k</M> is trivial if and only if the outer action
<M>\alpha</M> arises from some group extension <M>N\rightarrowtail E\twoheadrightarrow G</M>. If <M>k</M> is trivial then there is a bijection between the second cohomology group <M>H^2(G,Z(N))</M> and Yoneda equivalence classes of extensions of <M>G</M> by <M>N</M> that are compatible with <M>\alpha</M>.
<P/><B>First Example.</B>
<P/> Consider the group <M>H=SmallGroup(64,134)</M>.
Consider the normal subgroup <M>N=NormalSubgroups(G)[15]</M> and quotient group
<M>G=H/N</M>. We have <M>N=C_2\times D_4</M>, <M>A=Z(N)=C_2\times C_2</M> and <M>G=C_2\times C_2</M>.
<P/> Suppose we wish to classify all extensions <M>C_2\times D_4 \rightarrowtail E \twoheadrightarrow C_2\times C_2</M> that induce the given outer action of <M>G</M> on <M>N</M>. The following commands show that, up to Yoneda equivalence, there are two such extensions.
<Example>
<#Include SYSTEM "tutex/5.5.txt">
</Example>
<P/>The following additional commands return a standard <M>2</M>-cocycle <M>f:G\times G\rightarrow A =C_2\times C_2</M> corresponding to the non-trivial element in
<M>H^2(G,A)</M>. The value <M>f(g,h)</M> of the <M>2</M>-cocycle is calculated for all <M>16</M> pairs <M>g,h \in G</M>.
<Example>
<#Include SYSTEM "tutex/5.6.txt">
</Example>
<P/>The following commands will then construct and identify all extensions of <M>N</M> by <M>G</M> corresponding to the given outer action of <M>G</M> on <M>N</M>.
<Example>
<#Include SYSTEM "tutex/5.8.txt">
</Example>
<P/><B>Second Example</B>
<P/>The following example illustrates how to construct a cohomology class <M>k</M> in <M>H^2(G, A)</M> from a cocycle <M>f:G \times G \rightarrow A</M>, where <M>G=SL_2(\mathbb Z_4)</M> and <M>A=\mathbb Z_8</M> with trivial action.
<Example>
<#Include SYSTEM "tutex/5.7.txt">
</Example>
</Section>
<Section Label="secHadamard"><Heading>Second group cohomology and cocyclic Hadamard matrices</Heading>
An <E>Hadamard matrix</E> is a square <M>n\times n</M>
matrix <M>H</M> whose entries are either <M>+1</M> or <M>-1</M> and whose rows are mutually orthogonal, that is <M>H H^t = nI_n</M> where <M>H^t</M> denotes the transpose and <M>I_n</M> denotes the <M>n\times n</M> identity matrix.
<P/>Given a group <M>G=\{g_1,g_2,\ldots,g_n\}</M> of order <M>n</M> and the abelian group
<M>A=\{1,-1\}</M> of square roots of unity, any <M>2</M>-cocycle
<M>f\colon G\times G\rightarrow A</M> corresponds to an <M>n\times n</M> matrix <M>F=(f(g_i,g_j))_{1\le i,j\le n}</M> whose entries are <M>\pm 1</M>. If <M>F</M> is Hadamard it is called a <E>cocyclic Hadamard matrix</E> corresponding to <M>G</M>.
<P/>The following commands compute all <M>192</M> of the cocyclic Hadamard matrices for the abelian group <M>G=\mathbb Z_4\oplus \mathbb Z_4</M> of order <M>n=16</M>.
<Example>
<#Include SYSTEM "tutex/5.12.txt">
</Example>
</Section>
<Section Label="secCat1">
<Heading>Third group cohomology and homotopy <M>2</M>-types</Heading>
<B>Homotopy 2-types</B>
<P/>
The third cohomology <M>H^3(G,A)</M> of a group <M>G</M> with coefficients in a <M>G</M>-module <M>A</M>, together with the corresponding <M>3</M>-cocycles, can be used to classify homotopy <M>2</M>-types.
A <E>homotopy 2-type</E> is a CW-complex whose homotopy groups are trivial in dimensions <M>n=0</M> and <M>n>2</M>. There is an equivalence between the two categories
<Enum>
<Item>
(Homotopy category of connected CW-complexes <M>X</M> with trivial homotopy groups <M>\pi_n(X)</M> for <M>n>2</M>)
</Item>
<Item>
(Localization of the category of simplicial groups with Moore complex of length <M>1</M>, where localization is with respect to homomorphisms inducing isomorphisms on homotopy groups)
</Item>
</Enum>
which reduces the homotopy theory of <M>2</M>-types to a 'computable' algebraic theory. Furthermore, a simplicial group with Moore complex of length <M>1</M> can be represented by a group <M>H</M> endowed with two endomorphisms <M>s\colon H\rightarrow H</M> and <M>t\colon H\rightarrow H</M> satisfying the axioms
<List>
<Item><M>ss=s</M>, <M>ts=s</M>,</Item>
<Item><M>tt=t</M>, <M>st=t</M>,</Item>
<Item> <M>[\ker s, \ker t] = 1</M>.</Item>
</List>
Ths triple <M>(H,s,t)</M> was termed a <E>cat<M>^1</M>-group</E>
by J.-L. Loday since it can be regarded as a group <M>H</M> endowed with one compatible category structure.
<P/>The <E>homotopy groups</E> of a cat<M>^1</M>-group <M>H</M> are defined as: <M>\pi_1(H) = {\rm image}(s)/t(\ker(s))</M>; <M>\pi_2(H)=\ker(s) \cap \ker(t)</M>; <M>\pi_n(H)=0</M> for <M>n> 2</M> or <M>n=0</M>.
Note that <M>\pi_2(H)</M> is a <M>\pi_1(H)</M>-module where the action is induced by conjugation in <M>H</M>.
<P/>A homotopy <M>2</M>-type <M>X</M> can be represented by a cat<M>^1</M>-group <M>H</M> or by the homotopy groups <M>\pi_1X=\pi_1H</M>, <M>\pi_2X=\pi_2H</M> and a cohomology class <M>k\in H^3(\pi_1X,\pi_2X)</M>. This class <M>k</M> is the <E>Postnikov invariant</E>.
<P/><B>Relation to Group Theory</B>
<P/>A number of standard group-theoretic constructions can be viewed naturally as a cat<M>^1</M>-group.
<Enum>
<Item>
A <M>\mathbb ZG</M>-module <M>A</M> can be viewed as a cat<M>^1</M>-group <M>(H,s,t)</M> where <M>H</M> is the semi-direct product <M>A\rtimes G</M>
and <M>s(a,g)=(1,g)</M>, <M>t(a,g)=(1,g)</M>. Here <M>\pi_1(H)=G</M>
and <M>\pi_2(H)=A</M>.</Item>
<Item>
A group <M>G</M> with normal subgroup <M>N</M> can be viewed as a cat<M>^1</M>-group <M>(H,s,t)</M> where <M>H</M> is the semi-direct product <M>N\rtimes G</M>
and <M>s(n,g)=(1,g)</M>, <M>t(n,g)=(1,ng)</M>. Here <M>\pi_1(H)=G/N</M>
and <M>\pi_2(H)=0</M>.</Item>
<Item> The homomorphism <M>\iota \colon G\rightarrow Aut(G)</M>
which sends elements of a group <M>G</M> to the corresponding inner automorphism can be viewed as a cat<M>^1</M>-group <M>(H,s,t)</M> where <M>H</M> is the semi-direct product <M>G\rtimes Aut(G)</M> and <M>s(g,a)=(1,a)</M>, <M>t(g,a)=(1,\iota (g)a)</M>. Here <M>\pi_1(H)=Out(G)</M> is the outer automorphism group of <M>G</M>
and <M>\pi_2(H)=Z(G)</M> is the centre of <M>G</M>.</Item>
</Enum>
These three constructions are implemented in <B>HAP</B>.
<P/><B>Example</B>
<P/>The following commands begin by constructing the cat<M>^1</M>-group
<M>H</M>
of Construction 3 for the group <M>G=SmallGroup(64,134)</M>. They then
construct the fundamental group of <M>H</M> and the second homotopy group of as a
<M>\pi_1</M>-module. These homotopy groups have orders <M>8</M> and <M>2</M> respectively.
<Example>
<#Include SYSTEM "tutex/5.9.txt">
</Example>
<P/>
The following additional commands show that there are <M>1024</M> Yoneda equivalence classes of cat<M>^1</M>-groups with fundamental group <M>\pi_1</M> and
<M>\pi_1</M>- module equal to <M>\pi_2</M> in our example.
<Example>
<#Include SYSTEM "tutex/5.10.txt">
</Example>
A <M>3</M>-cocycle <M>f \colon \pi_1 \times \pi_1 \times \pi_1 \rightarrow
\pi_2</M> corresponding to a random cohomology class <M>k\in H^3(\pi_1,\pi_2)</M> can be produced using the following command.
</Section>
<Example>
<#Include SYSTEM "tutex/5.11.txt">
</Example>
The <M>3</M>-cocycle corresponding to the Postnikov invariant of
<M>H</M> itself can be easily constructed directly from its definition in terms of a set-theoretic 'section' of the crossed module corresponding to <M>H</M>.
</Chapter>
|