File: dependency_19.f90

package info (click to toggle)
gcc-arm-none-eabi 15%3A12.2.rel1-1
  • links: PTS, VCS
  • area: main
  • in suites: bookworm
  • size: 959,712 kB
  • sloc: cpp: 3,275,382; ansic: 2,061,766; ada: 840,956; f90: 208,513; makefile: 76,132; asm: 73,433; xml: 50,448; exp: 34,146; sh: 32,436; objc: 15,637; fortran: 14,012; python: 11,991; pascal: 6,787; awk: 4,779; perl: 3,054; yacc: 338; ml: 285; lex: 201; haskell: 122
file content (33 lines) | stat: -rw-r--r-- 760 bytes parent folder | download | duplicates (6) 
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
 
! { dg-do compile }
! Tests the fix for PR30273, in which the pointer assignment was
! wrongly determined to have dependence because NULL() was not
! recognised by the analysis.
!
! Contributed by Harald Anlauf <anlauf@gmx.de>
!
module gfcbug49
  implicit none

  type spot_t
     integer, pointer     :: vm(:,:,:)
  end type spot_t

  type rc_t
    integer               :: n
    type(spot_t), pointer :: spots(:) => NULL()
  end type rc_t  

contains

  subroutine construct (rc, n)
    type(rc_t), intent(out) :: rc
    integer   , intent(in)  :: n
    integer :: k
    rc% n = n
    allocate (rc% spots (n))
    forall (k=1:n)
       rc% spots (k)% vm => NULL() ! gfortran didn't swallow this
    end forall
  end subroutine construct

end module gfcbug49