File: stack-check-6a.c

package info (click to toggle)
gcc-arm-none-eabi 15%3A14.2.rel1-1
  • links: PTS, VCS
  • area: main
  • in suites: forky, sid, trixie
  • size: 1,099,328 kB
  • sloc: cpp: 3,627,108; ansic: 2,571,498; ada: 834,230; f90: 235,082; makefile: 79,231; asm: 74,984; xml: 51,692; exp: 39,736; sh: 33,298; objc: 15,629; python: 15,069; fortran: 14,429; pascal: 7,003; awk: 5,070; perl: 3,106; ml: 285; lisp: 253; lex: 204; haskell: 135
file content (20 lines) | stat: -rw-r--r-- 1,387 bytes parent folder | download | duplicates (2)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
/* The goal here is to verify that increasing the size of the guard allows
   elimination of all probing on the relevant targets.  */
   
/* { dg-do compile  } */
/* { dg-options "-O2 -fstack-clash-protection -fdump-rtl-pro_and_epilogue -fno-optimize-sibling-calls --param stack-clash-protection-probe-interval=12 --param stack-clash-protection-guard-size=16" } */
/* { dg-require-effective-target supports_stack_clash_protection  } */
/* { dg-skip-if "" { *-*-* } { "-fstack-protector*" } { "" } } */
/* { dg-skip-if "" { aarch64*-*-* } } */


#include "stack-check-6.c"

/* { dg-final { scan-rtl-dump-times "Stack clash inline probes" 0 "pro_and_epilogue" } } */
/* { dg-final { scan-rtl-dump-times "Stack clash probe loop" 0 "pro_and_epilogue" } } */
/* { dg-final { scan-rtl-dump-times "Stack clash residual allocation in prologue" 4 "pro_and_epilogue" } } */
/* { dg-final { scan-rtl-dump-times "Stack clash not noreturn" 4 "pro_and_epilogue" } } */

/* { dg-final { scan-rtl-dump-times "Stack clash no frame pointer needed" 4 "pro_and_epilogue" { target { ! frame_pointer_for_non_leaf } } } } */
/* { dg-final { scan-rtl-dump-times "Stack clash no frame pointer needed" 2 "pro_and_epilogue" { target { frame_pointer_for_non_leaf } } } } */
/* { dg-final { scan-rtl-dump-times "Stack clash frame pointer needed" 2 "pro_and_epilogue" { target { frame_pointer_for_non_leaf } } } } */