1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
|
/* PR tree-optimization/91567 - Spurious -Wformat-overflow warnings building
glibc (32-bit only)
{ dg-do compile }
{ dg-options "-O2 -Wall -ftrack-macro-expansion=0" }
{ dg-require-effective-target alloca } */
typedef __SIZE_TYPE__ size_t;
extern int sprintf (char*, const char*, ...);
extern size_t strlen (const char*);
void f (char *);
void g (char *s1, char *s2)
{
char b[1025];
size_t n = __builtin_strlen (s1), d = __builtin_strlen (s2);
if (n + d + 1 >= 1025)
return;
/* Ranger can find ranges here:
[1] n_6: size_t [0, 1023]
[2] d_8: size_t [0, 1023]
Whereas evrp can't really:
[1] n_6: size_t [0, 9223372036854775805]
[2] d_8: size_t [0, 9223372036854775805]
This is causing the sprintf warning pass to issue a false
positive here. */
sprintf (b, "%s.%s", s1, s2); // { dg-bogus "\\\[-Wformat-overflow" "" { xfail *-*-* } }
f (b);
}
/* Extracted from gcc/c-cppbuiltin.c. */
void cpp_define (char*);
static void
builtin_define_type_minmax (const char *min_macro, const char *max_macro,
void *type)
{
extern const char *suffix;
char *buf;
if (type)
{
buf = (char *) __builtin_alloca (__builtin_strlen (min_macro) + 2
+ __builtin_strlen (suffix) + 1);
sprintf (buf, "%s=0%s", min_macro, suffix); // { dg-bogus "\\\[-Wformat-overflow" }
}
else
{
buf = (char *) __builtin_alloca (__builtin_strlen (min_macro) + 3
+ __builtin_strlen (max_macro) + 6);
sprintf (buf, "%s=(-%s - 1)", min_macro, max_macro); // { dg-bogus "\\\[-Wformat-overflow" }
}
cpp_define (buf);
}
void
c_cpp_builtins (void *type)
{
builtin_define_type_minmax ("__WCHAR_MIN__", "__WCHAR_MAX__", type);
builtin_define_type_minmax ("__WINT_MIN__", "__WINT_MAX__", type);
}
|
