File: dependency_19.f90

package info (click to toggle)
gcc-arm-none-eabi 15%3A14.2.rel1-1
  • links: PTS, VCS
  • area: main
  • in suites: forky, sid, trixie
  • size: 1,099,328 kB
  • sloc: cpp: 3,627,108; ansic: 2,571,498; ada: 834,230; f90: 235,082; makefile: 79,231; asm: 74,984; xml: 51,692; exp: 39,736; sh: 33,298; objc: 15,629; python: 15,069; fortran: 14,429; pascal: 7,003; awk: 5,070; perl: 3,106; ml: 285; lisp: 253; lex: 204; haskell: 135
file content (33 lines) | stat: -rw-r--r-- 760 bytes parent folder | download | duplicates (6) 
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
 
! { dg-do compile }
! Tests the fix for PR30273, in which the pointer assignment was
! wrongly determined to have dependence because NULL() was not
! recognised by the analysis.
!
! Contributed by Harald Anlauf <anlauf@gmx.de>
!
module gfcbug49
  implicit none

  type spot_t
     integer, pointer     :: vm(:,:,:)
  end type spot_t

  type rc_t
    integer               :: n
    type(spot_t), pointer :: spots(:) => NULL()
  end type rc_t  

contains

  subroutine construct (rc, n)
    type(rc_t), intent(out) :: rc
    integer   , intent(in)  :: n
    integer :: k
    rc% n = n
    allocate (rc% spots (n))
    forall (k=1:n)
       rc% spots (k)% vm => NULL() ! gfortran didn't swallow this
    end forall
  end subroutine construct

end module gfcbug49