File: stack-check-6a.c

package info (click to toggle)
gcc-riscv64-unknown-elf 8.3.0.2019.08%2Bdfsg-1
  • links: PTS, VCS
  • area: main
  • in suites: bullseye
  • size: 680,956 kB
  • sloc: ansic: 3,237,715; cpp: 896,882; ada: 772,854; f90: 144,254; asm: 68,788; makefile: 67,456; sh: 29,743; exp: 28,045; objc: 15,273; fortran: 11,885; python: 7,369; pascal: 5,375; awk: 3,725; perl: 2,872; yacc: 316; xml: 311; ml: 285; lex: 198; haskell: 122
file content (19 lines) | stat: -rw-r--r-- 1,346 bytes parent folder | download | duplicates (2)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
/* The goal here is to verify that increasing the size of the guard allows
   elimination of all probing on the relevant targets.  */
   
/* { dg-do compile  } */
/* { dg-options "-O2 -fstack-clash-protection -fdump-rtl-pro_and_epilogue -fno-optimize-sibling-calls --param stack-clash-protection-probe-interval=12 --param stack-clash-protection-guard-size=16" } */
/* { dg-require-effective-target supports_stack_clash_protection  } */
/* { dg-skip-if "" { *-*-* } { "-fstack-protector*" } { "" } } */


#include "stack-check-6.c"

/* { dg-final { scan-rtl-dump-times "Stack clash inline probes" 0 "pro_and_epilogue" } } */
/* { dg-final { scan-rtl-dump-times "Stack clash probe loop" 0 "pro_and_epilogue" } } */
/* { dg-final { scan-rtl-dump-times "Stack clash residual allocation in prologue" 4 "pro_and_epilogue" } } */
/* { dg-final { scan-rtl-dump-times "Stack clash not noreturn" 4 "pro_and_epilogue" } } */

/* { dg-final { scan-rtl-dump-times "Stack clash no frame pointer needed" 4 "pro_and_epilogue" { target { ! frame_pointer_for_non_leaf } } } } */
/* { dg-final { scan-rtl-dump-times "Stack clash no frame pointer needed" 2 "pro_and_epilogue" { target { frame_pointer_for_non_leaf } } } } */
/* { dg-final { scan-rtl-dump-times "Stack clash frame pointer needed" 2 "pro_and_epilogue" { target { frame_pointer_for_non_leaf } } } } */