1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
|
This is a simple GUI for browsing C test coverage data gathered
by programs instrumented with "gcc -fprofile-arcs -ftest-coverage".
Hence it's a graphical replacement for the "gcov" program that
comes with gcc.
I wrote this program because I was sick of crappy text mode coverage
results, having been spoilt some years earlier by the PureCoverage GUI.
To use ggcov, invoke it with one or more .c filenames. It will
find and read the .bb, .bbg, and .da files in the same directory as
the .c files, and display data for you. You can also invoke ggcov
with a directory name; ggcov will apply itself to all the .c files
in that directory. Finally, you can mix multiple directories and
.c file names.
GGcov has three windows:
Summary
presents a test coverage summary at one of four scopes: overall,
file, function, or range of lines in a file. Note that the
range of lines can span function boundaries.
Function List
presents a list of all functions in the covered files, with their
coverage statistics. The list can be sorted by line coverage,
call coverage and branch coverage.
Source
presents the source of a covered file, annotated with source line
numbers and source line execution counts. Lines can be colour
coded according to whether they have been covered.
Limitations
-----------
The gcc+ggcov system has several limitations and gotches of which you
should be aware.
* Gcc will add enough instrumentation to .bbg files for ggcov to
tell that certain arcs between basic blocks are actually calls
to other functions, but there isn't enough information to tell
*which* other functions are being called, even when this is
known at compile time. Ggcov attempts to extract this information
after the fact by scanning the code in object files and correlating
that with the .bbg files. This process can fail for several
reasons, which will result in the data in the Call Graph and Call
Butterfly windows being absent or incomplete, and the data in the
Calls window not having the function names. Reasons for the include:
x gcc 2.96 on RedHat 7.3 is buggy and doesn't write the necessary
information to the .bbg file (note that gcov on RH 7.3 cannot
correctly report call stats either).
x the object files are missing
x the object files are for an architecture which is not yet
supported by ggcov for the purposes of this feature (at time
of writing, only x86 on Linux is supported).
x calls through function pointers or C++ virtual functions
are not known at compile time and cannot be calculated
using the data available to ggcov.
* Ggcov does not handle non-local flow transfer (such as setjmp()
or C++ exceptions) well. With the compilers I've been able to
test, neither does gcov.
* Code which puts multiple basic blocks on a line may not give the
line coverage numbers you expect. In particular, when an entire
loop is squashed into a single line, ggcov will report the number
of times the loop ran plus one for each time the loop started,
instead of the number of times the line as a whole ran.
* The Call Graph window uses a very primitive graph layout algorithm
and may well loop or crash when given used on some programs.
* The .da file is written by the instrumented program at two times
only: just before fork() and just after exit(). If your instrumented
program does neither (e.g. a long running server or a program that
terminates on a signal), it's counts will be lost.
Greg Banks <gnb@users.sourceforge.net>
2 July 2003.
|
