File: comment_2_a75e32b0825de0b405c45de14b9711c0._comment

package info (click to toggle)
git-annex 10.20230126-3
  • links: PTS, VCS
  • area: main
  • in suites: bookworm
  • size: 69,344 kB
  • sloc: haskell: 74,654; javascript: 9,103; sh: 1,304; makefile: 203; perl: 136; ansic: 44
file content (14 lines) | stat: -rw-r--r-- 917 bytes parent folder | download | duplicates (5)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
[[!comment format=mdwn
 username="jochen.keil@38b1f86ab65128dab3e62e726403ceee4f5141bf"
 nickname="jochen.keil"
 avatar="http://cdn.libravatar.org/avatar/a1329c0b3a262017553cc5497aa12c18"
 subject="comment 2"
 date="2020-02-14T12:04:53Z"
 content="""
Thanks for your hint, I appretiate that and I think it could be done that way.

However, on closer thought I was wondering if git-annex is the right tool for job. I had the impression that my idea came more from a hammer and nail situation. So, FUSE came to my mind. I popped it into google and found this: https://github.com/FS-make-simple/fusecompress
Unfortunately this does not look very active though.

Now, since I'm already at the FS layer I can look into ZFS compression. My repos are already on ZFS but I haven't looked at the built-in compression yet. I think I'll evaluate that first. If none of that is satisfactory I'll turn to git-annex again :)
"""]]