File: comment_5_ef6cfd49d24c180c2d0a062e5bd3a0be._comment

package info (click to toggle)
git-annex 10.20230126-3
  • links: PTS, VCS
  • area: main
  • in suites: bookworm
  • size: 69,344 kB
  • sloc: haskell: 74,654; javascript: 9,103; sh: 1,304; makefile: 203; perl: 136; ansic: 44
file content (12 lines) | stat: -rw-r--r-- 527 bytes parent folder | download | duplicates (12)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
[[!comment format=mdwn
 username="https://www.google.com/accounts/o8/id?id=AItOawl9sYlePmv1xK-VvjBdN-5doOa_Xw-jH4U"
 nickname="Richard"
 subject="comment 5"
 date="2011-03-16T15:47:17Z"
 content="""
If you can't segment the names retroactively, it's better to start with segmenting, imo.

As subdirectories are cheap, going with ab/cd/rest or even ab/cd/ef/rest by default wouldn't hurt.

Your point about git not needing to create as many tree objects is a kicker indeed. If I were you, I would default to segmentation.
"""]]