File: comment_2_e0ec78f09e5aba83ad3a7252695e4d96._comment

package info (click to toggle)
git-annex 10.20250416-2
  • links: PTS, VCS
  • area: main
  • in suites: trixie
  • size: 73,572 kB
  • sloc: haskell: 90,656; javascript: 9,103; sh: 1,469; makefile: 211; perl: 137; ansic: 44
file content (16 lines) | stat: -rw-r--r-- 647 bytes parent folder | download | duplicates (7)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
[[!comment format=mdwn
 username="Horus"
 subject="comment 2"
 date="2016-04-17T14:10:15Z"
 content="""
A very belayed reply...

I would really love to see a feature to make this easier! Like

* Interactive merge: During merge the user is asked for each file that conflicts, if it wants to keep the local or the remote
* A set merge tool: A tool that allows to either select the local or remote file, renames it accordingly and commits it.

Currently, I really fear a merge conflict, because I work with sets of binary files that needs to be in a coherent state and a merge conflict gives me very much trouble restoring that state.

Thanks!
"""]]