File: comment_1_12bb8f54bb13ea20ac4187a2301d77ca._comment

package info (click to toggle)
git-annex 6.20170101-1%2Bdeb9u2
  • links: PTS
  • area: main
  • in suites: stretch
  • size: 50,088 kB
  • sloc: haskell: 53,116; sh: 1,582; ansic: 341; makefile: 292; perl: 144
file content (10 lines) | stat: -rw-r--r-- 651 bytes parent folder | download | duplicates (11) 
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
 
[[!comment format=mdwn
 username="http://meep.pl/"
 ip="193.23.174.18"
 subject="Include/exclude"
 date="2012-10-06T08:40:23Z"
 content="""
It seems that example 2 reads weird for filtering because exclude/include say *what to do* while copies/in say *what to test*. An alias (maybe \"glob\") for include  should be acceptable both ways (largerthan=10mb or glob=junk/\* or not glob=\*.mp3).

That said, I would vote for keeping PCEs. And actually the simple \"not (copies=trusted:2 or in=usbdrive)\" does not read significantly worse than with \"dontwant\". (In *my bikeshed* we would have \"all\" == \"glob=\*\" and \"except\" == \"and not\").
"""]]